Registrant:
Domains by Proxy, Inc.
DomainsByProxy.com
15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
United States
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: JKSHDFKLJH23SADF.COM
Created on: 26-Feb-08
Expires on: 26-Feb-09
Last Updated on: 26-Feb-08
Administrative Contact:
Private, Registration JKSHDFKLJH23SADF.COM@domainsbyproxy.com
Domains by Proxy, Inc.
DomainsByProxy.com
15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
United States
(480) 624-2599 Fax -- (480) 624-2599
Technical Contact:
Private, Registration JKSHDFKLJH23SADF.COM@domainsbyproxy.com
Domains by Proxy, Inc.
DomainsByProxy.com
15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
United States
(480) 624-2599 Fax -- (480) 624-2599
Domain servers in listed order:
NS1-DURGA.WEBSERVERSYSTEMS.COM
NS2-DURGA.WEBSERVERSYSTEMS.COM
The USA did not give any aid to the other allies, they mostly made loans to to them so the could buy stuff from American companies. After Japan attacked perl harbour then they sent the army.
Without the USA the allies would probably have lost, that is obvious. England would not have turned back the German attack without all the food, supplies and money the USA sold and loaned. Loan with interest from private banks, who also financed the nazi before , and some even after, the USA entered the war. I think the last payment from England has been made just a few years ago. But the USA surely did not win the war by itself.
"Uh, right. I'm not going to answer this kind of rhetorical point. I would love to see you prove that 50% of all American army "kills" are civilian."
If you read better you'll notice I implied they kill 50% of the civilians, not that 50% of those killed are civilians, which is obviously not true; but wars since the beginning of the 20th century have killed many times more civilians than military personnel.
"1) It's not your right to know,"
Says who ?
"nor should it be."
Why?
"First of all, you're not a citizen of the country whose army is protecting you."
Then it is invaders. But anyway friend, foes , invaders or liberators I do not want to find myself in the middle of a battlefield completely by surprise.
"Second of all, even in cases where a country's own army is protecting local cities I'd love for you to show me a case where they openly announced "soft spots". No country in the world does this!"
Of course not. It would inform people that they are in danger and that the government does protect them. That could cause them problems. That why we need other sources to inform us.
"2) You assume that just because the Army knows its own soft spots, terrorists know it too. This is clearly not the case. You're not trying to imply they have ESP do you? Sure they know of *some* soft spots, but not all of them, and you're implying we should be publishing them all."
No ESP but they probably know most of them, and the gov know in some cases which one the "terrorists" know about. The only ones kept in the dark are the one who are actually at risk.
Information is power, they must keep it out of the hands of the masses.
If the American army is about to attack "terrorists" in MY village I would like to know. So i can't get the fuck out before they come in and kill half the village.
If I live in a "soft spot" and the gov know it the most surrly the terrorist know it too. I would like to know too, for obvious reasons.
And what does this have to do with bandwidth? you pay comcast for the bandwidth not the content. It is not their business what your traffic is. They just use that as an excuse. Let the RIAA run after the 'pirates'
Slashdot Mirror
Well I guest that two pebbles or even two dust particle could orbit each other.
The moon is a satellite of the earth.
Natural satellites of planets are moons.
Sheesh
damn! I was having a nice dream.
:)
wow, that's a nice one.
Wake me up when they find a moon orbiting a ring.
1-m ake films costing a bit less and stop paying that much for "above the line talent"
2- ???
3- profits!
"Are we truly free? Or is that just an illusion?"
no and no
it's not even an illusion
Let the pan-world orgy begin!
... will SCO disapear? It's enough already.
The people of Alaska knew that if they drove a car oil had to be transported, they knew the risks too.
Some one registerd JKSHDFKLJH23SADF.COM.
lol
Registrant:
Domains by Proxy, Inc.
DomainsByProxy.com
15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
United States
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: JKSHDFKLJH23SADF.COM
Created on: 26-Feb-08
Expires on: 26-Feb-09
Last Updated on: 26-Feb-08
Administrative Contact:
Private, Registration JKSHDFKLJH23SADF.COM@domainsbyproxy.com
Domains by Proxy, Inc.
DomainsByProxy.com
15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
United States
(480) 624-2599 Fax -- (480) 624-2599
Technical Contact:
Private, Registration JKSHDFKLJH23SADF.COM@domainsbyproxy.com
Domains by Proxy, Inc.
DomainsByProxy.com
15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
United States
(480) 624-2599 Fax -- (480) 624-2599
Domain servers in listed order:
NS1-DURGA.WEBSERVERSYSTEMS.COM
NS2-DURGA.WEBSERVERSYSTEMS.COM
The USA did not give any aid to the other allies, they mostly made loans to to them so the could buy stuff from American companies. After Japan attacked perl harbour then they sent the army.
Without the USA the allies would probably have lost, that is obvious. England would not have turned back the German attack without all the food, supplies and money the USA sold and loaned. Loan with interest from private banks, who also financed the nazi before , and some even after, the USA entered the war. I think the last payment from England has been made just a few years ago. But the USA surely did not win the war by itself.
"----Joke----> 0 You--> /|\ / \"
Ouch!
The USSR was a big part of it.
It may work fine for the military, but civilians die because of it. That's the point.
"Uh, right. I'm not going to answer this kind of rhetorical point. I would love to see you prove that 50% of all American army "kills" are civilian."
If you read better you'll notice I implied they kill 50% of the civilians, not that 50% of those killed are civilians, which is obviously not true; but wars since the beginning of the 20th century have killed many times more civilians than military personnel.
"1) It's not your right to know,"
Says who ?
"nor should it be."
Why?
"First of all, you're not a citizen of the country whose army is protecting you."
Then it is invaders. But anyway friend, foes , invaders or liberators I do not want to find myself in the middle of a battlefield completely by surprise.
"Second of all, even in cases where a country's own army is protecting local cities I'd love for you to show me a case where they openly announced "soft spots". No country in the world does this!"
Of course not. It would inform people that they are in danger and that the government does protect them. That could cause them problems. That why we need other sources to inform us.
"2) You assume that just because the Army knows its own soft spots, terrorists know it too. This is clearly not the case. You're not trying to imply they have ESP do you? Sure they know of *some* soft spots, but not all of them, and you're implying we should be publishing them all."
No ESP but they probably know most of them, and the gov know in some cases which one the "terrorists" know about. The only ones kept in the dark are the one who are actually at risk.
Information is power, they must keep it out of the hands of the masses.
If the American army is about to attack "terrorists" in MY village I would like to know. So i can't get the fuck out before they come in and kill half the village.
If I live in a "soft spot" and the gov know it the most surrly the terrorist know it too. I would like to know too, for obvious reasons.
No these are not alternatives, like you say these do not work. Abolishing money is better.
:)
"Money is an accounting system for what things are worth. It facilitates fair and efficient trade"
That's just not true. Money is just a mean of control.
(The first post was tongue in cheek, i did not expect a rational answer.)
'If reproductions of our best efforts are free,' he asks, 'how can we keep going?
Easy: Abolish money.
Duh!
You just use some kind of distributed raid. I'm sure sofeare for this already exist.
[non-expletive] [non-expletive] asshole [non-expletive]. [non-expletive] , fuck [non-expletive] [non-expletive] shit.
[non-expletive] [non-expletive] .
[non-expletive]
And what does this have to do with bandwidth? you pay comcast for the bandwidth not the content. It is not their business what your traffic is. They just use that as an excuse. Let the RIAA run after the 'pirates'
Does it run on linux?
Yeh, no car.
"why can't taxes pay for medical research?"
They do, to a large extent.
Google for Public investment , private profits.