Slashdot Mirror


Creditor Objects To SCO's Plans

I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes "It seems that SCO is never without a trick up its sleeve. In the new '$100 million' reorganization plan, $5 million of which is cash and $95 million credit, one of the creditors is protesting because SCO is hiding the Definitive Documents until there's no time to object. In their own words, 'The debtors are proposing to file the Disclosure Statement 33 days before the hearing, in compliance with the requirement that it be filed at least 25 days before the hearing (F. R. Bankr. P. 3017). However, it is clear that this Disclosure Statement will be inadequate for evaluating the Plan, because it will not include any of the Definitive Documents. The Debtors are proposing to file the Definitive Documents separately, and to do so a mere five business days before the hearing, which is zero days before objections are due.'"

108 comments

  1. When ... by McGiraf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... will SCO disapear? It's enough already.

    1. Re:When ... by Lewrker · · Score: 0

      They will never disappear. Cthulhu^H^H^H^H^H^H^HSCO fhtagn.

    2. Re:When ... by dpilot · · Score: 3, Funny

      When Duke Nukem Forever goes on sale, of course.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    3. Re:When ... by NoobixCube · · Score: 1

      I'm not even sure what their purpose is now... I wasn't sure what their purpose was before, when they were trying to sue people for using Linux, but now that they can't legally do that, what DO they do?

      --
      Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
  2. Surprise anyone? by KingKaneOfNod · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hiding important information has always been one of SCO's favourite strategies, right? (e.g. "Linux infringes on our IP, but we can't tell you where, how, or why.").

    1. Re:Surprise anyone? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Uhhh... that wasn't a strategy, that was a stalling tactic.

      From wikipedia: A strategy is a long term plan of action designed to achieve a particular goal, most often "winning".

      Unless their goal was something other than "winning".

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Surprise anyone? by samkass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As I understood it, their strategy was to claim vague infringement then try to uncover actual infringement in the discovery process when IBM was forced to turn over all their source code. Normally "fishing" like this is frowned upon, but they seemed to have gotten away with it. When they STILL couldn't come up with any infringement, I think, is when the judge started really limiting their shenanigans, though.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    3. Re:Surprise anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stalling counts as a goal.

    4. Re:Surprise anyone? by Infoport · · Score: 1

      "I'd gladly pay you Tuesday for a SCOburger today." --apologies to Wimpy

      Tomorrow is always an easier time to finally turn it all in, especially if you have to pull it out of your hat.

    5. Re:Surprise anyone? by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1

      Unless their goal was something other than "winning".


      The goal has been "FUDding" all along.

      This whole thing has been an obvious farce that Karl Rove would have been proud of perpetrated by the Monopoly to sow fear, uncertainty and doubt while trying to advance the latest sinking flagship OS on the world, all in the hope that the entire world would be so stupid, apathetic, or blind as to accept it all.

      Unfortunately for them, they chose a smarter opponent, the Linux community. Bastard Operators from Hell are to be feared.
  3. Tagged: by calebt3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    needawoodenstakethroughtheheart
    undead
    whywontyoujustdie

    1. Re:Tagged: by Daimanta · · Score: 4, Funny

      True, true.

      Has anobody tried any holy water?

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    2. Re:Tagged: by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      I tried a silver bullet three months ago, but it disintegrated in the aura of evil surrounding the Exec.

    3. Re:Tagged: by xouumalperxe · · Score: 2, Funny

      I tried a silver bullet three months ago, but it disintegrated in the aura of evil surrounding the Exec.

      You must be new here. Everybody knows there's no such thing as Silver Bullets in IT.

    4. Re:Tagged: by digitig · · Score: 1

      It might be worth trying sprinkling salt on them...

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    5. Re:Tagged: by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Flamethrowers. Fire should be enough to make Darl /stay/ down.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    6. Re:Tagged: by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.???

      Speaking of tags. . .

      Holding knowledge of another's dark secrets is one of the foremost ways the game of politics is played.

      I remember knowing the daughter of a political figure who had taught her well; he took her out drinking often when she was only a young teen so that she could build up a high tolerance to alcohol. He taught her how to dig up secrets in her opponents, and he taught her how to corrupt her fellows so that they would have secrets to fear losing control of. He was grooming he for political life; in short, he taught her the ways of Fear.

      Early on when I met her, I told her that my way of living was to remain open about everything; there was no secret I would be too frightened to share, and in this way, there was no way I could be bound or controlled. I saw fear in her eyes when she looked at me then, and I didn't understand why until I got to know her better.

      I have seen more harm arise from secrets kept than I ever would have imagined possible. And I have seen the most ludicrous acts which would normally be sorely condemned by society, not only easily forgiven but benefited from by entire communities simply because the participants were never afraid to share their thoughts and actions openly.

      In this way, knowledge shared is power gained, and that is the only kind of power one really needs, because Good Guys don't play chess.

      Just some thoughts.


      -FL

    7. Re:Tagged: by darthdavid · · Score: 1

      They fear cold iron!

    8. Re:Tagged: by corbettw · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, you knew Hillary Clinton when she was a kid?

      So, you an Obama supporter now?

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    9. Re:Tagged: by Mudd+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Interesting thoughts. You touch on a theme that I have been thinking about lately: zero sum games versus more creative solutions.

      So often we get stuck in zero sum games. You give up knowledge: I win; you lose. You get what you want: you win, I lose.

      But it doesn't have to be that way. Shared knowledge can mean gains for both parties. Enabling your collaborators (competitors?) allows you to concentrate on your strengths.

      Indeed, life does not have to be a chess match. But creativity and innovation are often required to avoid the trap of the zero sum game.

    10. Re:Tagged: by Captain+DaFt · · Score: 1

      "I tried a silver bullet three months ago, but it disintegrated in the aura of evil surrounding the Exec."

      No no no, silver bullets are for werewolves. To vanquish evil assholes, you need to hit'em with a silver suppository!

      --
      The U.S. really needs an English to Wisdom dictionary.
    11. Re:Tagged: by jagdish · · Score: 1

      Or Jesus disks?

    12. Re:Tagged: by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      A bullet is a small suppository that makes it's own orifice.

    13. Re:Tagged: by rucs_hack · · Score: 2, Funny

      It might be worth trying sprinkling salt on them...

      THE POWER OF STALLMAN COMPELS YOU!!!111one.

      Or something of that nature

    14. Re:Tagged: by justinlee37 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are no "Good Guys," and we all play chess. You've just caught on to one of the advanced moves.

    15. Re:Tagged: by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      That's horrible. He raised his daughter to be a moral-lacking manipulative cunt? I mean, I'm kind of controlling and manipulative but I still evaluate right and wrong in the playing field and work on the open-honest angle, and with no blackmail (I'd never disseminate anything someone told me in private without serious reason, like it being the only way to make them stop damaging me with distortion of related facts).

      There are better ways to deal with people than lie-cheat-steal-blackmail. Yes, even if you want to keep them under your thumb.

    16. Re:Tagged: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure it's been expounded on at length, but one conclusion that I came to recently was a difference between so-called conservatives and liberals. As a rule I don't like labels, but as I'm talking about generalities, I think it's appropriate. I think both conservatives and liberals, at their core, just want to be left alone to do whatever they want within the bounds of government, which is a reflection of popular morality. The difference then, is how they go about it. A conservative might extoll the virtues of limited government, and in so doing, advocate freedom through secrecy. A liberal might, then, advocate acceptance and tolerance of deviance, thereby rendering secrecy unnecessary. In view of what Fantastic Lad said, no secrets would certainly give people less to hold over your head.

    17. Re:Tagged: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you knew Hillary Clinton when she was a kid? She was raised as a Republican.
  4. Yes, well... by djupedal · · Score: 5, Informative

    The press release stated that Stephen Norris Capital Partners was doing the deal, that it was a limited partnership, without specifying in which state, and it listed Norris as "managing partner" of SNCP:

            "We saw a tremendous investment opportunity in SCO and its vast range of products and services, including many new innovations ready or soon to be ready to be released into the marketplace," said Stephen Norris, managing partner for SCNP....

            About Stephen Norris Partners

            Stephen Norris & Co. Capital Partners, L.P. is a private equity investment partnership formed to (i) "co-invest" alongside well established and successful private equity and leveraged buyout firms, (ii) take advantage of the business experience and relationships of its Investment Committee, including Steve Norris' long-standing relationships and substantial private equity experience.

    While the press release says that SNCP is a partnership, the MOU says it's a deal between SCO and STEVE NORRIS CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC and it defines SNCP as "Stephen Norris Capital Partners, LLC" and it further says it's a Delaware limited liability company ("Investment Team: Stephen Norris Capital Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("SNCP").").

    1. Re:Yes, well... by n6kuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "We saw a tremendous investment opportunity in SCO and its vast range of products and services, including many new innovations ready or soon to be ready to be released into the marketplace,"

      I guess "products and services" means troll patents and lawsuits.
      I wonder what "new innovations" of these they are about to unleash?

      --
      If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
    2. Re:Yes, well... by djupedal · · Score: 1

      "I wonder what "new innovations" of these they are about to unleash?"

      Don't hold your breath - the $100 mil was more of a bailout than a future-booster.

  5. SCO... by Archeopteryx · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...you will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.

    --
    Dog is my co-pilot.
    1. Re:SCO... by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Microsoft, Sony BMG and the MAFIAA...

      --
      The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
    2. Re:SCO... by Sleepy · · Score: 1

      O RLY?

      MONSANTO!

    3. Re:SCO... by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

      Its really not Monsanto thats to blame since they play the whole "IP" card by the book really. Laws is what should keep corporations at bay but in a fascist state that dont work so well.

      --
      HTTP/1.1 400
  6. Never by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    SCO will be with us for many years to come. That's why I paid my $500 fee!

    PAY YOUR $500 FEE YOU PINKO COMMIE

    On 21 July 2003, SCO announced it received U.S. copyright registrations for Unix System V source code. SCO claims that its IP rights from UnixWare cover the latest kernel version of Linux, v.2.4, which includes code important in symmetric multiprocessing (SMP) scaling. SCO said it will offer UnixWare licenses to enterprises that use Linux 2.4 and later and will not sue Linux customers for past copyright violations if they buy a UnixWare license.

    1. Re:Never by snl2587 · · Score: 1

      SCO claims that its IP rights from UnixWare cover the latest kernel version of Linux, v.2.4, which includes code important in symmetric multiprocessing (SMP) scaling. SCO said it will offer UnixWare licenses to enterprises that use Linux 2.4 and later and will not sue Linux customers for past copyright violations if they buy a UnixWare license.

      Right...so how is that working out for them?

      And good luck suing Linux users...you may want to ask the RIAA how the whole litigation thing is going, and in this case there isn't even a flimsy legal rock to stand on.

    2. Re:Never by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 4, Funny

      The fee was not $500. The fee was $699, you cock smoking tea bagger.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    3. Re:Never by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Furrfu, the parent is *funny*, *not* flamebait.

      http://slashdot.org/~SCO%24699FeeTroll/

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    4. Re:Never by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Funny
      I'm sorry to have to feed the troll,but if there is one thing worse than a troll,it's a bad troll.They are worse than bad mimes,IMHO.If you are going to do the SCO troll,then at least post it correctly


      PAY YOUR $699 LICENSE FEE, YOU COCK-SMOKING TEABAGGERS! Is I believe the correct syntax for the troll you are attempting.Please,in the future,learn how to troll correctly or go to digg.We here on slashdot have high standards when it comes to our trolls,and many of our trolls go on to exciting careers in such fields as Microsoft zealotry and Comcast management.So in the future please uphold the high standards set before you by distinguished alumni like the GNAA and the guy that makes ASCII goatsx drawings.Thank you for your time.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    5. Re:Never by Dik+Zak · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's him.

    6. Re:Never by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1

      Linux 2.4? Latest kernel version?

      Dude, that is SOOO 90s. Unfortunately, SCO doesn't have a headlock on the POSIX standard.

    7. Re:Never by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      One can always count on the fact that even in a culture such as Slashdot, where the body of lore consists of a handful of idiotic repetitions on subjects such as grits, old people in Korea, old Yakov Smirnov jokes, or just getting to the front of the posting line, there are always some morons who do not even know that much of it.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  7. Get your money NOW! by canuck57 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hey, with these guys, get your money now. The lawyers fees will eat it otherwise.

    Totally amazes me how this takes so long to say what everyone believes, SCO - go-away. You have no claim nor future.

  8. It's a flaw in the American judicial system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    SCO was able to spew its fud at will in America, no proof required. In Germany they got slapped down. The German courts said in effect: "If you can't prove what you're saying is true, you have to shut up."

    It is pathetic that SCO has been able to drag this farce out for so long.

    1. Re:It's a flaw in the American judicial system by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Hmm - just a smaller version of the OJ Simpson trial.

      For whatever reason in the US you can basically tie up courts as long as you'd like. First person to run out of money loses.

      Just about any kind of litigation costs a fortune here - mainly because stuff gets dragged out forever...

  9. News? by stapedium · · Score: 1

    Why is SCO still news?
    Sounds like the creditors are getting what they deserve. Lay down with dogs...

    1. Re:News? by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's still news because the LP offering to buy them is doing so in order to continue the linux litigation that got SCO into this current situation. No surprise, there's a lot of speculation that Microsoft is somehow behind the sudden desire of this LP to acquire SCO and continue the litigation since it helps to continue a FUD campaign that Microsoft would love to see continue.

    2. Re:News? by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Another poster pointed out awhile back that another reason for this buy out of SCO is to keep its internal records from becoming public.

      The whole thing is just a ploy to shield all those internal emails and documents that would reveal just who was really behind it all, we all know that M$ is in on it but who else could there be? What other companies or business interests have benefited from the FUD that SCO has generated?

      By buying SCO and taking it back to a privatively held company it could be quietly dismantled and the evidence of collusion and conspiracy buried permanently.

    3. Re:News? by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Would that be the FUD campaign that has so far put off remarkably few businesses, not really had much of an impact on IBM, Red Hat or Novell's bottom line and been smacked down in court so many times now it's a wonder that nobody's been brought up for wasting the courts' time?

      If Microsoft is behind this VC taking an interest in SCO, I can think of only two possible reasons:

      1. They don't know when to give up and look for another tack. Possible, certainly.
      2. There is a lot more to this than we already know - so much so that someone's prepared to pay a lot of money to prevent that information possibly becoming public.

      Point (2) could explain funding by anyone, not just Microsoft.

  10. get two more creditors and press for chapter 7 by swschrad · · Score: 5, Interesting

    that's when it will end.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:get two more creditors and press for chapter 7 by Nikker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The company just exists to piss us off and spread FUD. If they didn't want the stigma of the company they would have started fresh just putting the money to another company hiring the same legal team and taking it from a slightly different point of attack. They're one step away from being a new company anyway, Darl is being let go there's just going to be another one. If it wasn't for them getting so much time in people's web browsers no one would even know they existed. So in short there are people with enough money involved to make the SCO company keep to its purpose, they aren't going to win anything since the OSS community is too fluid to necessarily point out a single block of code to bring down the whole "framework".

      If anything now would be the time to advocate the Linux idea / OS more than ever. Computer kids out there get called all the time to fix friends and families computers, you should offer a special $20 install that would involve you installing a distro on their computer. The price is variable of course but distro's could work with the installers to make the going rate tempting enough for anyone to attempt to offer it at the price. People would look at it as quick cash, distributions would see that the easier it is for someone to install and educate the end user the more people will install their distribution for a price. Eventually as people grow more aware of the OS they will search out to install it themselves, at this point the OS will be so easy to install and run it will catch like wild fire.

      Now the ones who were installing the OS move up to support / customization. What ever the price charged to do an install will be used as a type of yard stick of value. Eventually with computer power increasing and OS developers cooperation the time to install a running OS will take less time but as long as the price remains set and the operation is exact and efficient you will be making that $20-$40 in under 10 minutes. From there you can use that as a reference to charge for time in support and customization. As long as the initial price does not waver much people will build trust in the concept and the best will be in demand. This is the most diverse and distributed industry that will ever be.

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    2. Re:get two more creditors and press for chapter 7 by bstone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The games they've been playing, even out in clear view od the SEC and bankruptcy courts, with other people's money (millions of which went to corp execs) are probably nothing compared to what they're going to do if they take the company private. No need to report to anyone. Just declare bankruptcy when Novell wins, and pay bonuses to the execs for FUD well done, and exit with no cash to pay the creditors.

    3. Re:get two more creditors and press for chapter 7 by rucs_hack · · Score: 2, Informative

      Linux will not gain wide acceptance outside of business until high street stores have shelves full of commercial games from the major development houses and publishers.

      So no, you likely won't get many takers for the Linux install for $20, because most people who are interested would probably do it themselves.

    4. Re:get two more creditors and press for chapter 7 by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1

      A lot of games would run well on Linux if the Wine devs could get some meaningful documentation from Microsoft on how all the graphical hooks work, so that they in turn could implement all the right APIs in their own code to do the exact same thing as Windows. This is one of the interoperability issues that the EU has fined Microsoft over this week.

      Also to support the effort, more hardware vendors need to wake up and start coding Linux drivers for their products. Why, just a week ago I saw a great deal on a Lexmark printer/fax/copier that I assumed would offer some sort of support for Linux. Unfortunately for me, I let my big head do all the wrong thinking.

      The printer works great in Windows, but the only thing I have running Windows is a small laptop. My servers close to where I have room in this little house are both running Linux. Lexmark can't be arsed to develop a fully-working driver for anything but Windows products. They have a Linux developer's kit, but unless you're a programmer, that's basically useless. If only they'd realize that with both Linux and Mac users left out in the cold, they're pissing off 33% of the market these days. All it would take is to write a PPD file for cups.

      Anyone up to the job? Find Reverend Eggplant on Usenet alt.slack if you want to contribute to the effort.

    5. Re:get two more creditors and press for chapter 7 by domatic · · Score: 1

      Lexmark has long snubbed Linux in the driver department. It goes back for years.

    6. Re:get two more creditors and press for chapter 7 by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Informative

      Since Lexmark has also long snubbed its printers in the quality department, I, as a linux user, have absolutely no problem with that.

    7. Re:get two more creditors and press for chapter 7 by Nikker · · Score: 1

      The idea is to sell the $20 install and yes as the bar raises in terms of exposure and acceptance people will install it themselves that is the idea. Once they do that they will need more advanced services which cost more. It would be similar to creating a "business" ;)

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
  11. Here is the real story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here is the real story:

    Legitimate businesses are dying for venture capital. And here it is, being wasted.

    1. Re:Here is the real story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound bitter.

    2. Re:Here is the real story by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Legitimate businesses are dying for venture capital. And here it is, being wasted.

      And anyone with two neurons left to rub together to make a spark would know that. You'd think anyone investing 100 million dollars would be a little more careful about where their money's going, wouldn't you? But they're not really investing a 100 million, they're investing 5 million.

      So someone is willing to put up five mil to SCO in exchange for nothing. That same someone thinks that five million is not being wasted. Since they're getting nothing from SCO, what are they getting? Not that this bizarro world plan has any chance getting past the trustee, but where do they keep finding collaborators to go along with this fraud?

      Another line of questioning might ask who could get someone do go along with flushing 100 million, or even five million down the toilet? That's a shorter list. Because if SCO goes begging for dollars, they'd get laughed out of the room. So it's not SCO. That would leave Microsoft. They have lots of money. People with money usually have friends with money. But what's Microsoft getting at this point? Nothing. This case exhausted its value to them years ago. Vista is a giant, steaming turd and everyone knows it. Linux and Apple are feasting on their entrails and the EU is hitting them with billions in fines.

      So, what's the five million for?

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    3. Re:Here is the real story by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      So, what's the five million for?

      "Teh lulz", obviously. At this point SCO is a practical joke perpetuated by multimillionaires.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    4. Re:Here is the real story by drew · · Score: 1

      Well, it may be a bit of a stretch, but I can think of at least one company with an awful lot of money that has good reason to make sure SCO doesn't die before their lawsuits are settled...

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    5. Re:Here is the real story by Tom · · Score: 1

      So, what's the five million for? My guess: Keeping certain documents hidden and certain people out of jail (where they would talk).
      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  12. Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fair payback to the creditors helping to keep that turkey afloat. What, you thought they only were out to screw other people?

  13. Fraud by JSBiff · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know, I know, don't feed the trolls. . . but he's so cuuuuuutte.

    Judge Kimball already found that there was never any transfer of copyright. SCO's copyright registration was fraudulent (well, I suppose you could make the argument that it isn't fraud if they really *believed* they owned the copyright, but nevertheless, it's still invalid). It's already been decided that SCO does not own Unix copyrights or trademarks (the trademark issue was not decided in court, I do not believe, but by the US Patent and Trademark Office, I believe, which said that Unix was already a trademark owned by the Open Group [which anyone could have told SCO, but they wouldn't listen, of course]).

    Basically, SCO owns no part of Unix.

    There's also the *small* problem that they've never actually demonstrated any infringement by Linux, even if they *did* own Unix. Which they don't.

    This whole Bankruptcy charade, as far as I can tell, has mostly been about delaying the inevitable, so that SCO's execs and board of director could continue to get salaries and outrageous bonuses for as long as possible, bleeding the company dry and leaving a worthless, dessicated carcass for Novell, IBM, Red Hat, and Autozone to fight over.

    1. Re:Fraud by v1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't bonuses have to be approved by a board or something? Who would continue to approve bonuses for the captain of a ship clearly about to go under?

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    2. Re:Fraud by tap · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The board gets bonuses too, they all loot the ship together before it sinks.

    3. Re:Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You would be surprised to see how a board can reward inept management. Board members and top management are often members of the same country club. Over time, a CEO becomes chairman of the board and is given oodles of stock.

  14. Settle it more efficiently! by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think all this court-related mumbo-jumbo should be dropped in favor of a more efficient way to settle things. Darl and Linus should meet in a forest, with witnesses from both sides. They should stand back-to-back, walk ten paces, turn around, and shoot. Darl should be given a water gun. Linus should be given a BFG-9000.

    1. Re:Settle it more efficiently! by The+Mighty+Buzzard · · Score: 3, Funny

      Darl would just sue claiming the BFG9000 infringed on SCO IP.

      --
      Violence is like duct tape. If it doesn't solve the problem, you didn't use enough.
    2. Re:Settle it more efficiently! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, fortunately the suit would be filed posthumously. I believe that will have less weight with court.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:Settle it more efficiently! by jo42 · · Score: 0, Troll

      D. would immediately turn around and club L. over the head with the water gun, rendering him unconscious. D. would then take the BFG and frag L. to bits.

    4. Re:Settle it more efficiently! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      D. would immediately turn around and club L. over the head with the water gun, rendering him unconscious. D. would then try to take the BFG and frag L. to bits.

      However Linus' second, Eric S. Raymond would pull out his gun as soon as he saw Darl violating the rules of the duel and would proceed to pump the contents of the magazine into Darl's jerking body as soon as Darl tried to reach for the BFG.
  15. Not a creditor by elronxenu · · Score: 4, Informative
    Actually it's Al Petrofsky's filing, and he's a shareholder (and not to my knowledge a creditor).

  16. No,no...this is /. by Grog6 · · Score: 1, Funny

    It will be whan Natalie Portman comes out with her own line of Hot Grit Pants, in Soviet Russia.

    And Yes, I AM an insensitive clod. ;)

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
    1. Re:No,no...this is /. by Metasquares · · Score: 2, Funny

      You must be new here :)

  17. Reminds me of a story about. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Funny
    The Lady and the Snake. . .

    The Lady falls in love with a Snake, and she invites him into her home.
    The Snake bites her, and hurt and horrified, she cries, "I will surely die! Why? Why did you bite me?"
    "But my dear," the Snake replied, "I am a Snake, and you should have known better."

    Moral of the story? Same as every other. . . "Ignorance Endangers."


    -FL

    1. Re:Reminds me of a story about. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
      Once a snake, always a snake.

      Actually, I almost said the moral was, "Don't be Stupid!", thinking that this was the ubiquitous moral of all stories, but then figured it was way too pejorative. Even smart people make mistakes when they don't know any better.


      -FL

  18. Irony? by oahazmatt · · Score: 1

    Am I alone in noticing the irony that someone using the name "I don't believe in imaginary products" is contributing news on a company that really hasn't offered any sort of product in quite some time, yet still sold something?

    --
    Those who believe the Internet is private,
    find their privates are on the Internet.
  19. Dont forget... by renegadesx · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...to pay your $699 licensing fee you cock smoking teabagger

    Fixed

    --
    Make SELinux enforcing again!
  20. Give Mr D what he is good at... by hAckz0r · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just let him use the same old foot gun. We all know he just can't miss with that piece of iron.

  21. You're a liar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    the story would have been believable had you not thrown in the crap about a teenage girl fearing you for not having secrets

    with that and the "live my life" crap you just come off as sanctimonious

    good effort though

    1. Re:You're a liar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahaha... Yea. This guy posts elaborate imaginary stories all the time.
      Not sure if he's trolling or not but read this thread if you want more...thread

  22. Re:Dont forget... by Dik+Zak · · Score: 1

    Oh man, I miss this guy. Where's he gone? What was his name again? SCO$699feetroll or something? I wonder if it was really Darl.

  23. Wow, Weird Writeup. by bytesex · · Score: 4, Funny

    In Other News, Capitalizers all around the World rejoice when the Definitive Documents will not be Heard of, or Seen, before the Disclose Statement has been passed before the Council of the Upper Case. Shift key Users all around the Planet will express their Utmost Pleasure at the Revealing of the Plan. Dr Evil, in the mean time, who is an Ardent Caps Lock Aficionado, will make all Debtors Disappear. It's That Easy.

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
  24. Serves you right. by EddyPearson · · Score: 1

    Serves them right for investing in SCO. Muppets.

    --
    You feel sleepy. Close your eyes. The opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever felt otherwise.
    1. Re:Serves you right. by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'm imagining the investors as Statler & Waldorf.

  25. They would have disappeared by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    While it was Sun and MS that originally started this crap, Sun pulled out once caught (and sold their ill gotten stock), and it has been a total MS deal every since. Vista has not taken off. Had it done so, then SCO would have chap 7 long ago.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:They would have disappeared by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2, Insightful
      While it was Sun and MS that originally started this crap, Sun pulled out once caught (and sold their ill gotten stock), and it has been a total MS deal every since. Vista has not taken off. Had it done so, then SCO would have chap 7 long ago.

      It was and continues to be a total SCO deal. The money they extorted from Sun and Microsoft is pretty much in line with other IPR ransom demands. IBM has so far spent at least $100 million litigating this one, Novell at least $10 million. IBM could have settled for less than they have spent, Novell had no reason to get involved at all.

      I can promise you that when you get one of these demands, you don't think 'maybe I should pay so these people will go screw over someone else'. Instead its 'I really wish someone would stand up to this scum, pity its not going to happen'.

      Anyone care to imagine what the Slashdot consensus would have been if Microsoft had chosen to stand and fight on this one and IBM had settled?

      The mistake SCO made was to demand money from a company that simply could not settle the case at any price.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    2. Re:They would have disappeared by epine · · Score: 1
      If you offer blood to a vampire, it soon returns stronger and in greater numbers. The plague and pestilence will not end until you drive a stake through its heart. If that costs $100m up front, it's money well invested.

      IBM could have settled for less than they have spent ... That's an elementary error in game theory, the failure to distinguish a single instance game from an iterated game.

      It's also an elementary error in management theory: failure to distinguish a narrow effect from broad and recurring effects.

      It's a also an elementary error in basic manhood: sticking up for yourself at the first opportunity instead of handing over your lunch money to escape a minor torment and becoming the class whipping boy as a result.
    3. Re:They would have disappeared by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      If you offer blood to a vampire, it soon returns stronger and in greater numbers. The plague and pestilence will not end until you drive a stake through its heart. If that costs $100m up front, it's money well invested.

      Yes, but the problem is that the stakes cost $2 million each and the supply of vampires is rather larger than you might imagine.

      Why is it the duty of the victims to take on what has become a government sponsored extortion racket? Doesn't the government have a responsibility to act as well?

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  26. New acronym? by TriCCer · · Score: 1

    SCO == SCO's Creditors Object.

    --
    c0w goes moo.
  27. Hush money? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    > So, what's the five million for?

    Total speculation: maybe this is the part where msft wants the scam to just go away. Act as if it never happened. So everybody gets enough loot, so that they have nothing to really bitch about. Then scox is taken private, and disovled.

  28. Mmmmm... stock! by Gription · · Score: 1

    Yeah all that stock that the CEO was given is really going to make him some money!

    The only thing he has to worry about is if the stock were to (for some unknown reason, god forbid!) become worthless...

  29. What Did you Expect? SCO == by bratwiz · · Score: 1


    SCO == Slimy Conniving Obfuscators

    or if you prefer:

    Smelly Cumwad Onanists

    Smarmy Cretinous Organization

    Scat Consuming Organisms

    Smoke Casting Operators

    Sue-happy Criminal Operation

    Silly Craven Oblocutors

    Sullen Crooked Obscurators

    Seed Capital Obliterators

    Silly Corporate Odditorium

    Shit Casting Odibles

    Saccadic Cacogenic Onomancers

    Sacculiformed Coprolithic Oschealopaths

    Salacious Contumacious Ophidians

    Sanctimonious Contemptuous Opisthosomes ... did I leave anything out??

  30. Says you. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    the story would have been believable had you not thrown in the crap about a teenage girl fearing you for not having secrets

    with that and the "live my life" crap you just come off as sanctimonious


    Sanctimonious? Well, that's subjective. All I can say is that I do my best to be the best version of myself. I don't always get it right, but it's hardly fair to say that anybody's efforts are false.

    And calling me a liar? Come on. --You can't actually do that within the bounds of logic. The best you can honestly say is that you have trouble believing me. --And seriously; my little anecdote is really not that far out, but if your experience of the world has been limited to predictable excursions, then I can see why you might be inclined to think otherwise. Six billion people offer a lot of different possibilities. Get out and try meeting some of the more interesting ones and then you'll see. But you won't get very far if you pre-judge everybody and call them names. --You'll just find yourself sitting grumpily at a little table in the corner, scowling at the world for not existing according to the instruction manual while there is dancing and music in the streets.


    -FL

  31. A shock? by Solokron · · Score: 1

    A fool and their money are soon parted.

    --
    30% off web hosting. Coupon code "SLASHDOT".