Some manufacturers already do that. They make cameras for forensic use that sign every photo so it can be proven to be genuine. A few years back Elcomsoft released a tool to forge the signatures.
This. These programmes take a decade or more to come to fruition. President's last at most 8 years, although didn't Trump say he would only do 4? Anyway, too long for the current administration to take credit.
Yeah, it was ambiguous at best. A former child prostitute, Bond comes into her shower unexpectedly... In real life most people would be freaked out, even if they did like the guy. In the end their association gets her shot in the head.
Since you asked, the issue is that assuming women will "flake out" isn't fair, and that the lack of support for mothers means that if they do get pregnant it's more likely they won't be able to return to work.
Maybe you don't care about that, but you should at least worry about the potential for a falling population or well educated people with good jobs not having kids.
Early computer programming was considered to be secretarial work, and fairly menial. Like women would be expected to know how to type and do basic typewriter maintenance, or operate the phone system, or run the filing system, it was natural that they then started programming too.
Back then there wasn't that much difference between operating and programming. The most advanced UI was a teletype that took abbreviated, unintuitive commands and spat back coded messages.
It's worrying that this story has been tagged "cultural Marxism" and "fake news". Someone apparently feels so threatened by what is largely considered an uncontroversial historical fact that they think it's an attempt to destroy our culture.
Think about that. Do they think that remembering things used to be worse will harm us, that we are that fragile? Or do they want to white-wash the past so they can go back to the 1950 model society without resistance?
Rather than guessing why not look at the research done into why there are not more male nurses?
Bullying is a factor. Like women trying to get into tech and science, it's partly down to men being discouraged by teachers and parents. Partially social pressure, partly the low status of nursing making it an unattractive career (thus less motivation to overcome barriers to enter the profession).
That's why it's worth looking at these issues, they affect men as well.
Shifting the goal posts a bit there. We were talking about complementing attire, specifically with words to the effect of "it looks good on/you/" so that it also comments on their body too.
Obviously if it is a serious distraction that's quite different.
Nothing wrong with noticing, but you have to appreciate that many women like to look good for their own self confidence and to feel good. They are not necessarily trying to attract complements or a mate at work, they just like wearing fashionable clothes and fashionable hair.
That's why women don't abandon such efforts once they are married. Getting attention is very far down the list of reasons to dress nicely at work.
I really struggle to reconcile the Slashdot view that systemd is total crap and the fact that every major Linux distro has switched to it.
It seems like Lennart is an asshole with no clue about security, but despite that it does seem to offer enough for people who sell Linux, people who offer commercial support for it, seem to think it's better.
Red Hat said it hadn't affected sales when they did an interview here.
Why do you make these ridiculous assumptions about me, that inevitably turn it to be wrong? You are literally never right. You would be more accurate if you took your expectations and assumed the exact opposite.
So, anyway, instead of trying to deflect, about this manufactured sexual harassment claim conspiracy... It's made up. Exists only in your head. There is zero evidence of collision. The onus is on you to prove otherwise.
Trumpists still don't seem to have realised that they were fucked over, even as the tax plans hit and all pretence falls away.
Clinton lost because she became part of the false narrative. "You are under attack by liberals, immigrants, the political elite. I'll drain the swamp, build a big wall. Simple solutions to complex problems. I'll lead your revolution against this crook!"
And you got Trump, who doesn't give a shit about you now he has your vote. The plan is to screw you hard, blame someone else and peddle the same lies next election.
Maybe women wonder why random guys feel the need to comment publicly on their attire. I mean, saying it looks good on them is as much a comment on their body as on the dress.
A lot of the debts they buy are fraudulent. They rarely get paperwork, and if they do it's often incomplete or just wrong. In many cases the debt was not paid because it's fraudulent or the details are incorrect.
By that logic we shouldn't protest anything the government does because if it doesn't work out just wastes money. Money is clearly the most important thing here, a few million in litigation tops out of the billions being pissed away on this thing.
Or maybe we could go really nuts and claim it's a subsidy to Mexico. A 30ft high wall is a massive stimulus program for 31ft ladder manufacturers south of the border.
Also, well done calling my post retarded. Really adds credibility to your argument-by-Trump "it will definitely happen, and it will be easy" narrative.
The Apple Watch will lock you in to using an iPhone as well, because it needs to be paired with one to be useful.
And like all smart watches, the fitness tracking is bunk. The heart rate sensors are all wildly inaccurate, the only to get a good reading being a chest strap device. Step counting is a poor proxy. About the only useful function is GPS tracking your run, but a watch is a poor way to do that.
So what is the plan, cede the land to Mexico? Because if you build the wall close to the border and make it unpassable, it's gonna be pretty difficult to stop Mexicans on the other side simply using it as their own.
Slashdot Mirror
Some manufacturers already do that. They make cameras for forensic use that sign every photo so it can be proven to be genuine. A few years back Elcomsoft released a tool to forge the signatures.
To me the trend starting in the 90s is more worrisome. We reached a peak and then dropped off significantly.
This. These programmes take a decade or more to come to fruition. President's last at most 8 years, although didn't Trump say he would only do 4? Anyway, too long for the current administration to take credit.
Yeah, it was ambiguous at best. A former child prostitute, Bond comes into her shower unexpectedly... In real life most people would be freaked out, even if they did like the guy. In the end their association gets her shot in the head.
Gmail still doesn't load remote content by default. On the web site or in the mobile app on android. Have not checked iOS.
Since you asked, the issue is that assuming women will "flake out" isn't fair, and that the lack of support for mothers means that if they do get pregnant it's more likely they won't be able to return to work.
Maybe you don't care about that, but you should at least worry about the potential for a falling population or well educated people with good jobs not having kids.
Early computer programming was considered to be secretarial work, and fairly menial. Like women would be expected to know how to type and do basic typewriter maintenance, or operate the phone system, or run the filing system, it was natural that they then started programming too.
Back then there wasn't that much difference between operating and programming. The most advanced UI was a teletype that took abbreviated, unintuitive commands and spat back coded messages.
It's worrying that this story has been tagged "cultural Marxism" and "fake news". Someone apparently feels so threatened by what is largely considered an uncontroversial historical fact that they think it's an attempt to destroy our culture.
Think about that. Do they think that remembering things used to be worse will harm us, that we are that fragile? Or do they want to white-wash the past so they can go back to the 1950 model society without resistance?
Rather than guessing why not look at the research done into why there are not more male nurses?
Bullying is a factor. Like women trying to get into tech and science, it's partly down to men being discouraged by teachers and parents. Partially social pressure, partly the low status of nursing making it an unattractive career (thus less motivation to overcome barriers to enter the profession).
That's why it's worth looking at these issues, they affect men as well.
I dunno, why do you feel the need to repeat it every time?
Because TFA doesn't say that. Only you are saying that, and you should explain why you are trying to derail the debate with this false narrative.
Shifting the goal posts a bit there. We were talking about complementing attire, specifically with words to the effect of "it looks good on /you/" so that it also comments on their body too.
Obviously if it is a serious distraction that's quite different.
Nothing wrong with noticing, but you have to appreciate that many women like to look good for their own self confidence and to feel good. They are not necessarily trying to attract complements or a mate at work, they just like wearing fashionable clothes and fashionable hair.
That's why women don't abandon such efforts once they are married. Getting attention is very far down the list of reasons to dress nicely at work.
They get paid a fixed amount per delivery. If they work 8 hours but the roads are busy they get less money.
Actually yeah, that thing should be in public ownership and turned into a tourist attraction. Guillotines optional.
So would you be okay with it if it still broke compatibility but that was necessary to add some really important/useful features?
I really struggle to reconcile the Slashdot view that systemd is total crap and the fact that every major Linux distro has switched to it.
It seems like Lennart is an asshole with no clue about security, but despite that it does seem to offer enough for people who sell Linux, people who offer commercial support for it, seem to think it's better.
Red Hat said it hadn't affected sales when they did an interview here.
It took me three attempts to parse that title... Commas needed!
I guess you didn't see this post: https://slashdot.org/comments....
Why do you make these ridiculous assumptions about me, that inevitably turn it to be wrong? You are literally never right. You would be more accurate if you took your expectations and assumed the exact opposite.
So, anyway, instead of trying to deflect, about this manufactured sexual harassment claim conspiracy... It's made up. Exists only in your head. There is zero evidence of collision. The onus is on you to prove otherwise.
All they need to do is not eat or pay rent for a couple of weeks and the problem is solved, right?
Actually it's like this all year round. Has been for years. They are just bringing it up again because of the Christmas rush.
Trumpists still don't seem to have realised that they were fucked over, even as the tax plans hit and all pretence falls away.
Clinton lost because she became part of the false narrative. "You are under attack by liberals, immigrants, the political elite. I'll drain the swamp, build a big wall. Simple solutions to complex problems. I'll lead your revolution against this crook!"
And you got Trump, who doesn't give a shit about you now he has your vote. The plan is to screw you hard, blame someone else and peddle the same lies next election.
Maybe women wonder why random guys feel the need to comment publicly on their attire. I mean, saying it looks good on them is as much a comment on their body as on the dress.
A lot of the debts they buy are fraudulent. They rarely get paperwork, and if they do it's often incomplete or just wrong. In many cases the debt was not paid because it's fraudulent or the details are incorrect.
By that logic we shouldn't protest anything the government does because if it doesn't work out just wastes money. Money is clearly the most important thing here, a few million in litigation tops out of the billions being pissed away on this thing.
Or maybe we could go really nuts and claim it's a subsidy to Mexico. A 30ft high wall is a massive stimulus program for 31ft ladder manufacturers south of the border.
Also, well done calling my post retarded. Really adds credibility to your argument-by-Trump "it will definitely happen, and it will be easy" narrative.
The Apple Watch will lock you in to using an iPhone as well, because it needs to be paired with one to be useful.
And like all smart watches, the fitness tracking is bunk. The heart rate sensors are all wildly inaccurate, the only to get a good reading being a chest strap device. Step counting is a poor proxy. About the only useful function is GPS tracking your run, but a watch is a poor way to do that.
So what is the plan, cede the land to Mexico? Because if you build the wall close to the border and make it unpassable, it's gonna be pretty difficult to stop Mexicans on the other side simply using it as their own.