which is by design and a known fact. the issue was that Merc calculator didn't take that into account otherwise hamilton would have paced himself to counter that. the real tragedy is the HAAS debacle... they are ferrari powered;)
Salaried employees are typically over worked wage slaves that either enjoy abuse or are too ignorant of that fact. "If you want to be paid based on how much value you provide to the company" then work on on a commission basis. again the base pay for commission employees is typically the same.
there might be a generational gap between us that will only be resolved after you retire/duck
lets agree to disagree. Managing two different people differently is part of your jab as a manager. However we are talking about pay for a specific job. Maybe your hiring decision is based on where an employee will lead or fit better. If you hire two people for the same job today and pay them different, well better get ready for some issues in today's world.
if you mean fill roles that are not part of their job description or responsibility, then you are probably doing something i wouldn't feel comfortable with. in smaller workspace, people do have to be more flexible and wear different hats. as long as that is part of their responsibility and job description, and its the same job description for someone else... otherwise different job descriptions require different pay.
Then either you need to rethink the titles, or the organization of the employees or the need of 10 employees. other wise you are most likely abusing the "heavy lifters" and they would and should move on leaving with you the "light lifters"?
"same job title responsibility and workload" would alleviate your objection of versatility. Experience required for being hired is relevant, if you have more that is wonderful but the job does not require it and is not needed. if you think you are undervalued for this job (and maybe rightfully) then this is not for you. excellence... that's where performance reviews come into place, so may be year end bonus or raise is altered but again... two people getting hired for same job should be paid the same.
as in Bundy
that's Captain Al, to you
"It has to support over a billion different" security bugs
cause can't do stuxnet without windows.
i for one am waiting on the win10 bugs relase notes by stuxnet2
Vault 12 FTW
ummm, no need to "step" to the window, a picture has already been uploaded from your camera.
hence... treaties... which extend/grant rights to citizens of other constituencies based upon mutual agreement!!
"Anyway, now that we can edit-out the defects" yes like dark hair and eyes /duck
didn't Nasa just launch a WSUS server up there
https://www.nasa.gov/directora...
mmm yes without the lube for everyone
no
in this particular case you are not the ass.
assume if you have an online account it is or will be hacked. then decide what information to share and if online is worth it.
i think you are confusing them with MicroShaft
your data is still monetized, again, as the public has been made aware, its not just the ads (bad enough, but a choice) you have to watch out for.
i forgot, /. is only for your particular opinion only. thank you for your opinion on my non opinion.
i will raise you a kimmie
which is by design and a known fact. the issue was that Merc calculator didn't take that into account otherwise hamilton would have paced himself to counter that. ;)
the real tragedy is the HAAS debacle... they are ferrari powered
don't do the crime, if you can't do the time.
congress is old fashioned and leery of bitcoin, it takes time to gather bribes in cash.
i guess i should say, i can give a rats ass, i am sure some one cares...
Salaried employees are typically over worked wage slaves that either enjoy abuse or are too ignorant of that fact. "If you want to be paid based on how much value you provide to the company" then work on on a commission basis. again the base pay for commission employees is typically the same.
there might be a generational gap between us that will only be resolved after you retire /duck
lets agree to disagree. Managing two different people differently is part of your jab as a manager. However we are talking about pay for a specific job. Maybe your hiring decision is based on where an employee will lead or fit better. If you hire two people for the same job today and pay them different, well better get ready for some issues in today's world.
if you mean fill roles that are not part of their job description or responsibility, then you are probably doing something i wouldn't feel comfortable with.
in smaller workspace, people do have to be more flexible and wear different hats. as long as that is part of their responsibility and job description, and its the same job description for someone else...
otherwise different job descriptions require different pay.
Then either you need to rethink the titles, or the organization of the employees or the need of 10 employees. other wise you are most likely abusing the "heavy lifters" and they would and should move on leaving with you the "light lifters"?
"same job title responsibility and workload" would alleviate your objection of versatility. Experience required for being hired is relevant, if you have more that is wonderful but the job does not require it and is not needed. if you think you are undervalued for this job (and maybe rightfully) then this is not for you.
excellence... that's where performance reviews come into place, so may be year end bonus or raise is altered but again... two people getting hired for same job should be paid the same.
check has cleared i guess