well then how do you propose to subsidize verizon, att's roll out of proposed 5g that they will charge customers and prohibit local municipalities from providing for free/fee.
one issue that i have with this logic, lets say that i am a better than average driver and have successfully NOT killed anyone in my life while driving a vehicle. Now lets say an AV that i am a passenger in (probably own) kills a child. who is responsible for my psychological trauma when in my estimation i would have been able to prevent the death had I been in control.
i do the same with a thunderbolt hub for other connectivity as well, personally i prefer the blue tooth head set for me because I use it for my soft phone, but if i was listening to music... and cared about the experience...
no not the govt itself but the users of govt systems that exploit such things. Govt employees pay... anyway since a lot of these tools get sold to the third world regimes it is perhaps plausible?
"wearenotterroristsnothingtoseehere.org" until some one puts it on the list, there are third party vendors that classify websites including "violence or terrorism" and so its not far fetched by any means. as to the second part... of course not its an DNS list unless they start filtering by content by providing a content filter and not just DNS filter.
the idea maybe that the flagged terrorist site is not in the DNS at all. so the rhetoric that could be considered "poisonous" is not accessed. the issue maybe what is considered "poisonous", terrorism today and free speech tomorrow.
it would be interesting if this was a transparent effort where the logic/decision tree was available for discussion.
the ugly is if you type in www.theguardian.com are you getting the guardian or just a reasonable facsimile of it with the appropriate malware injected.
Slashdot Mirror
well then how do you propose to subsidize verizon, att's roll out of proposed 5g that they will charge customers and prohibit local municipalities from providing for free/fee.
but then whom do you sue?
mmmm 67 camaro
why do we continue to call this "PORN" and not just child exploitation/crime/abuse.
do the iot dance
because there is no way to keep tabs on battery efficiency and safety?
so microsoft's "installed" numbers should atleast be reduced by 12%?
i am just looking for 3.50
umm they created win10, once the cancer is the body ... you have eradicated the disease (healthy cells) by inverse
i think not, i am ready to replace my X2 modem and this technology should fit an end user like me.
one issue that i have with this logic,
lets say that i am a better than average driver and have successfully NOT killed anyone in my life while driving a vehicle. Now lets say an AV that i am a passenger in (probably own) kills a child. who is responsible for my psychological trauma when in my estimation i would have been able to prevent the death had I been in control.
its called trickle down censorship, Reagan would approve ;)
third world market beta testing
all of this points to a better public transport system even if it is automated cars.
they probably just bought the aperatus to break it so when an fbi employee uses it to !hack! it its not illegal :)
i do the same with a thunderbolt hub for other connectivity as well, personally i prefer the blue tooth head set for me because I use it for my soft phone, but if i was listening to music... and cared about the experience...
meh Verizon is a state protected asset, nothing to see here citizen move along
percentile dice...
no not the govt itself but the users of govt systems that exploit such things. Govt employees pay... anyway since a lot of these tools get sold to the third world regimes it is perhaps plausible?
i was just buying stuff at victoriasecret.com for the last 10 hours... occifer
"wearenotterroristsnothingtoseehere.org" until some one puts it on the list, there are third party vendors that classify websites including "violence or terrorism" and so its not far fetched by any means.
as to the second part... of course not its an DNS list unless they start filtering by content by providing a content filter and not just DNS filter.
is that enough money to temp state actors?
also where is the host files guy when you need him
just point to the remote DNS hosted by the NSA instead, there is still some freedoms allowed in the US.
the idea maybe that the flagged terrorist site is not in the DNS at all. so the rhetoric that could be considered "poisonous" is not accessed. the issue maybe what is considered "poisonous", terrorism today and free speech tomorrow.
it would be interesting if this was a transparent effort where the logic/decision tree was available for discussion.
the ugly is if you type in www.theguardian.com are you getting the guardian or just a reasonable facsimile of it with the appropriate malware injected.