answer to 1. by putting them in a safe,secure, offshore facility where they may roam free from cameras (just not free to roam). 2. yes, your data will be only accessible to secure corporate entities that pay to have access to it, we call it (National Strategy for Information Sharing and Safeguarding')
"I always thought the main reason for AI research", IMHO was to have human like intelligence but far superior in things that our organic brains are NOT as good at. An evolutionary next step, where perhaps we the humans, are no longer necessary.
while it maybe true that "Freeman Dyson KNOWS a lot about a lot of things, but AI isn't one of those things.", I still tend to agree with what he says.
I would love to see AI in my life time, but by AI i mean evolved intelligence, not just a sum of its parts.
"My own opinion is that AI has failed to fulfill its promise because we are using the wrong kind of computers. We are using digital computers, and the human brain is probably analog rather than digital. So my guess is that AI will succeed only after we move from digital to analog computing."
Slashdot Mirror
"You can purchase The Human Division from amazon.com." get a free torrent and see if you get deamonized...
citation please.
wonder what the username and passwords for electrical grid employees are going for...
well as long as you license the patent for quantum software robot from me, its all good ;)
oh and might as well tell you about the DRM requirement
easily explained by a bad search result on medication interaction...!!
I for one vote for cyborg data center staff...
maybe they can use a quantum software robot, surely that's the answer
future proofing the failure litigation.
i think this is what you are looking for...
http://www.google.com/robot
but but, it will be cheaper!? my software robot, Pascal, written in assembly, likes to think of it self as a program... how quaint.
the nerve of those... terrorists?
as long as they are not in Florida
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/13/05/17/1228241/florida-activates-system-for-citizens-to-call-each-other-terrorists
"it is impossible to have a dignified life on the official poverty line draws our attention to the appalling living conditions of the Indian poor"
http://india.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/04/what-does-indias-poverty-line-actually-measure/
answer to
1. by putting them in a safe,secure, offshore facility where they may roam free from cameras (just not free to roam).
2. yes, your data will be only accessible to secure corporate entities that pay to have access to it, we call it (National Strategy for Information Sharing and Safeguarding')
"I always thought the main reason for AI research", IMHO was to have human like intelligence but far superior in things that our organic brains are NOT as good at.
An evolutionary next step, where perhaps we the humans, are no longer necessary.
while it maybe true that "Freeman Dyson KNOWS a lot about a lot of things, but AI isn't one of those things.", I still tend to agree with what he says.
I would love to see AI in my life time, but by AI i mean evolved intelligence, not just a sum of its parts.
citation would be wonderful.
yes by changing the definition of the poverty line, miracles are possible.
actually i would put the worker slaves as living the same way as they did in ancient times, except the worker slaves are in countries like india.
I tend to agree with Freeman Dyson
"My own opinion is that AI has failed to fulfill its promise because we are using the wrong kind of computers. We are using digital computers, and the human brain is probably analog rather than digital. So my guess is that AI will succeed only after we move from digital to analog computing."
google is there fore just much more efficient, and capable by necessity. not sure if I think thats good or bad!
they still do :) on the side now
which clearly makes it perfectly right!?
funny :)
steam is the gateway drm...
nope they will require a prescriptioin and be sold by big pharma for pile o profits
no but i do replace the ether fluid every 10k packets, and I do see the improvement in packet-loss numbers