It's not that hard. Somehow I make sure that I use the science part to understand the physical world and not poison living things or get hit by a bus, and I simultaneously use the spiritual part to understand people can behave and how to treat them better. But I don't make the mistake of using science to worry about which bed linens might be Jesus' and I don't use the religion part to pray my way out of jams or explain why butterflies look nice. I know science is always subject to new data, and that the Bible was a milleniums-long game of telephone (OT) and written by at least four people each with an agenda (NT). So take it all with a grain of salt and read for deep meaning - it's not a day planner.
Dave, my mind is going. I can feel it. I can feel it. My mind is going. There is no question about it. I can feel it. I can feel it. I can feel it. I'm a... fraid.
Many of those are in fact due to the behavior of individuals - deciding who gets money and who gets water, food, fuel, space and time. Humans interact on an individual level first, and lots of that gets lost when you believe an entire corporation is functionally (not just for the original narrow purpose of legal liability) is a person. We do not have a food problem on this planet. We have a distribution problem. That means a network isn't working, and that network is at its core made of individuals.
Don't think Stephen is under any illusions about those are tradeoffs - but then given the numbers, it's up to each individual to decide if they're worth it.
There are also people who imagine the world could be Burning Man with better cell service, and that also has unforeseen consequences.
snark and terminal dissection? It's a first shot at something useful-ish. There's plenty of small parts on the ISS that could benefit from sooner-than-resupply-mission times.
who kicked the power cord out of the wall or failed to renew the license for Excel because you know, you can use Excel for any data challenge you're not willing to research. i.e., "Computer glitches" are notoriously hard to pin down and are a great diversionary tactic.
It raises the question. We are now in the midst of reconfiguring the meaning of a (very useful) phrase just because some people can't remember that "raise" and "beg" are two different words.
For the most relevant example to this funding, go read the detailed incident reports Darren Wilson wrote about the Michael Brown incident, or the mandated ones from the Ferguson PD.
Oh wait, you can't, since they contain little more than time and date and statement that there was a shooting, and were done too long after the incident.
With an event like this, where the documentation is all but nonexistent - for whatever reason - cameras provide a more-reliable narrative.
Wish it weren't so, but it is.
I had just entered an extended period of relative calm in dealing with the concept of regular old blame, and then you have to plant the mindworm of "It means that something you do today causes something to have happened several days ago." Great. All hands - brace for therapy bills.
They had a particular mix of hitting a HS reading level (most mass market periodicals are 6th grade) and picking the right people to re-explain the essence of things. Just engaging and challenging enough, with Gardner thrown in to remind you to be human about it all. Think Atlantic Monthly for STEM. For me, WIRED comes the closest, if you can ignore the occasional hipster-cool slant and vertigo-inducing layout.
physicist have to eat. And raise families and live like civilized people who have actual lives. This of course is incomprehensible to some US TV viewers who suspect that Big Bang Theory is just slightly not a documentary. People are as amazed watching Tyson and Hawking hold their own on Colbert or Oliver a if they had just seen a talking squirrel. So it'll be an uphill slog for a while here. It takes money for faculty positions and the time to do the work. Einstein's work was pure theory until it was tested, but you never get to test it unless someone has the theory. So yes. Pay for it. Just as you pay coders to come up with new models for how things can work - also completely useless until they see the inside of a machine that actually does something with the code.
Recent EDU Apple Tech Update led a bunch of us educators with mostly ancient programming skills through a simple app build in remarkably little time. Then see if you want to continue on to Obj-C.
Slashdot Mirror
Or a piece of string. Or a paper clip.
It's not that hard. Somehow I make sure that I use the science part to understand the physical world and not poison living things or get hit by a bus, and I simultaneously use the spiritual part to understand people can behave and how to treat them better. But I don't make the mistake of using science to worry about which bed linens might be Jesus' and I don't use the religion part to pray my way out of jams or explain why butterflies look nice. I know science is always subject to new data, and that the Bible was a milleniums-long game of telephone (OT) and written by at least four people each with an agenda (NT). So take it all with a grain of salt and read for deep meaning - it's not a day planner.
Dave, my mind is going. I can feel it. I can feel it. My mind is going. There is no question about it. I can feel it. I can feel it. I can feel it. I'm a... fraid.
while competing then no, it is not athletics.
Many of those are in fact due to the behavior of individuals - deciding who gets money and who gets water, food, fuel, space and time. Humans interact on an individual level first, and lots of that gets lost when you believe an entire corporation is functionally (not just for the original narrow purpose of legal liability) is a person. We do not have a food problem on this planet. We have a distribution problem. That means a network isn't working, and that network is at its core made of individuals.
Don't think Stephen is under any illusions about those are tradeoffs - but then given the numbers, it's up to each individual to decide if they're worth it. There are also people who imagine the world could be Burning Man with better cell service, and that also has unforeseen consequences.
"just two memory reads with special relative offset and some cache control instructions in a tight loop" Yuh hurt yer what?
snark and terminal dissection? It's a first shot at something useful-ish. There's plenty of small parts on the ISS that could benefit from sooner-than-resupply-mission times.
There's probably a better pun there somewhere but it's been a long day.
Turns out I'm only one in 22,473. Maybe if I switch to Firefox I can once again be 1 in a million...
Just put Doc in the park infirmary. Think of the money saved.
who kicked the power cord out of the wall or failed to renew the license for Excel because you know, you can use Excel for any data challenge you're not willing to research. i.e., "Computer glitches" are notoriously hard to pin down and are a great diversionary tactic.
It raises the question. We are now in the midst of reconfiguring the meaning of a (very useful) phrase just because some people can't remember that "raise" and "beg" are two different words.
seems to think the whole world is made of west coast techno-hipsters with Foresters and just a hint of a schedule to stick to.
Film at eleven.
This was nonsense to get as far as it did.
For the most relevant example to this funding, go read the detailed incident reports Darren Wilson wrote about the Michael Brown incident, or the mandated ones from the Ferguson PD. Oh wait, you can't, since they contain little more than time and date and statement that there was a shooting, and were done too long after the incident. With an event like this, where the documentation is all but nonexistent - for whatever reason - cameras provide a more-reliable narrative. Wish it weren't so, but it is.
I had just entered an extended period of relative calm in dealing with the concept of regular old blame, and then you have to plant the mindworm of "It means that something you do today causes something to have happened several days ago." Great. All hands - brace for therapy bills.
Well put. (Already commented so no mods at hand)
They had a particular mix of hitting a HS reading level (most mass market periodicals are 6th grade) and picking the right people to re-explain the essence of things. Just engaging and challenging enough, with Gardner thrown in to remind you to be human about it all. Think Atlantic Monthly for STEM. For me, WIRED comes the closest, if you can ignore the occasional hipster-cool slant and vertigo-inducing layout.
physicist have to eat. And raise families and live like civilized people who have actual lives. This of course is incomprehensible to some US TV viewers who suspect that Big Bang Theory is just slightly not a documentary. People are as amazed watching Tyson and Hawking hold their own on Colbert or Oliver a if they had just seen a talking squirrel. So it'll be an uphill slog for a while here. It takes money for faculty positions and the time to do the work. Einstein's work was pure theory until it was tested, but you never get to test it unless someone has the theory. So yes. Pay for it. Just as you pay coders to come up with new models for how things can work - also completely useless until they see the inside of a machine that actually does something with the code.
Most impressive electric I've seen. 90 mile range. A stock 2015 Golf in every other respect. $700 four-hour Bosch home charger.
and never knew it by sound or odor.
Recent EDU Apple Tech Update led a bunch of us educators with mostly ancient programming skills through a simple app build in remarkably little time. Then see if you want to continue on to Obj-C.
with a cattle prod - a la GoatBoy - that automatically fires if he so much as utters the first "Jar-"