He said it would be a great place if EVERYONE did it. I'm not a bible thumper (by any stretch), but presumably if EVERYONE followed, no one would be trying to overpower and enslave you.
It has everything to do with the EMAIL ADDRESS he apparently wasn't willing to change. They wouldn't grant him the address he requested. All he had to do was pick another email address and he would have been fine. I'm sorry, but you are not entitled to any email address you want.
They're not actually shipping the affected product anymore, so presumably if you get a newly enough manufactured replacement part, you won't have the problem on the new piece of equipment.
I always thought the definition of a "core" as whatever the minimal set of hardware required to run a single thread at "full power". By my logic, anytime you run more than one thread on a core, you're doing what SMT does.
In sort of the same vein of misunderstanding how evolution works, the body doesn't "invest" in anything. It makes random changes that either work or don't. This would be better worded as saying "bodies that require the expensive neurological systems would be less likely to survive unless they served a purpose" would be closer to how things really work. Saying that the body is going out of its way to go towards a certain trait is insulting to how absolutely simplistic evolution is. "Try everything and keep what works"
You have limited time to get done what you want. You want to see how well the person communicates and codes, so you have to combine the two - that's exactly what white board or phone coding does.
That's so fucked up, isnt' it? Hold the innocent with standards longer than the guilty with nothing other than wanting to save their own ass. Jail doesn't rehabilitate shit, so this makes no sense to me.
Likely you've never used an iphone keyboard for an extended period of time. The keyboard is actually quite good. Well, I do suppose it's good for typing english. I'm not sure I'd want to program on it. It likes to tell you what you mean.
And the police can enforce those laws. Doesn't mean Google, a company with a fine rhetoric about not being evil (not not-following-the-laws-of-every-country-they-operate-in), has to .
This is not a criminal case. The lawyers are in control. If they are asked to do something unethical, then they are required to not do it or they will be sanctioned by the court/bar. Contrary to popular belief, lawyers are not owned by their corporate masters and have a higher "rule" to obey.
In a criminal defense, the defendant in the end is responsible for his defense and can tell the lawyer to stfu. However, he cannot make the lawyer do unethical things - they tend to do that kind of stuff on their own - but they can't be forced to.
Not necessarily. Only if you distribute ALL your binaries with source do you not have to provide source for ANYONE on demand. If you allow written requests for source, you must allow the source to be obtained by ANYONE.
It would also be possible to die from old age before completing the three circumnavigations. The Concorde wasn't built in a time when energy conservation was a goal.
Considering the F-22 is the first (and only?) airplane capable of supersonic speeds without the use of afterburners (or some sort of rocket technology), it's not surprising that the Concorde needs a lot of gas.
Because certain types of copies are allowed. For instance, you're allowed to have a copy of a program on your hard drive and in RAM. You can have a copy sitting in a hard drive cache. The intent behind copyright is that you purchase it for a purpose (and likely the DJs had to purchase a more expensive version that allows public performance) and you can use it for that purpose.
I've always thought the music industry should have to pick. Either they can sell you a physical media with which you can do whatever you want (public performances or personal use) or sell you a license to use the music in a certain way (private use only, but you have the right to the music in any format you want for that purpose).
The GPL really doesn't need to be tested in court. As it relies on copyright, if you don't obey the requirements of the license, you fall back to the default constraints of any copyrighted work -- namely you can't distribute it.
Exactly. That's why they're not going to do this. They don't want you knowing that they know who you are. Unless of course they know you know they know who you are.
Slashdot Mirror
Lisa, is that you? Roy (no, he's dead)? Claudia?.. shoot, she's dead too.
SPOILER ALERT!
You're going to have a License Agreement presented to the End User.. Maybe call it LAEU?
It's walking like a duck and quacking like a duck.
He said it would be a great place if EVERYONE did it. I'm not a bible thumper (by any stretch), but presumably if EVERYONE followed, no one would be trying to overpower and enslave you.
Talk about a ball and chain...
Anybody want a peanut?
No one was suggesting using a consumer-grade printer for this task. At least I hope they weren't.
I think the word you're looking for is "presumed".
I'm typing this sentence very slowly to make sure this comment takes long enough to write...
It has everything to do with the EMAIL ADDRESS he apparently wasn't willing to change. They wouldn't grant him the address he requested. All he had to do was pick another email address and he would have been fine. I'm sorry, but you are not entitled to any email address you want.
They're not actually shipping the affected product anymore, so presumably if you get a newly enough manufactured replacement part, you won't have the problem on the new piece of equipment.
can I naturalize?
I always thought the definition of a "core" as whatever the minimal set of hardware required to run a single thread at "full power". By my logic, anytime you run more than one thread on a core, you're doing what SMT does.
Someone please tell me if I'm wrong (and how).
In sort of the same vein of misunderstanding how evolution works, the body doesn't "invest" in anything. It makes random changes that either work or don't. This would be better worded as saying "bodies that require the expensive neurological systems would be less likely to survive unless they served a purpose" would be closer to how things really work. Saying that the body is going out of its way to go towards a certain trait is insulting to how absolutely simplistic evolution is. "Try everything and keep what works"
You have limited time to get done what you want. You want to see how well the person communicates and codes, so you have to combine the two - that's exactly what white board or phone coding does.
That's so fucked up, isnt' it? Hold the innocent with standards longer than the guilty with nothing other than wanting to save their own ass. Jail doesn't rehabilitate shit, so this makes no sense to me.
s//\%\@\#\$/gi;
Presumably his lawyer worked this stuff out. That's the lawyer's legal responsibility to his/her client.
You might want to keep looking. Companies that do this kind of thing once don't usually stop at 1.
Likely you've never used an iphone keyboard for an extended period of time. The keyboard is actually quite good. Well, I do suppose it's good for typing english. I'm not sure I'd want to program on it. It likes to tell you what you mean.
And the police can enforce those laws. Doesn't mean Google, a company with a fine rhetoric about not being evil (not not-following-the-laws-of-every-country-they-operate-in), has to .
This is not a criminal case. The lawyers are in control. If they are asked to do something unethical, then they are required to not do it or they will be sanctioned by the court/bar. Contrary to popular belief, lawyers are not owned by their corporate masters and have a higher "rule" to obey.
In a criminal defense, the defendant in the end is responsible for his defense and can tell the lawyer to stfu. However, he cannot make the lawyer do unethical things - they tend to do that kind of stuff on their own - but they can't be forced to.
Not necessarily. Only if you distribute ALL your binaries with source do you not have to provide source for ANYONE on demand. If you allow written requests for source, you must allow the source to be obtained by ANYONE.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WhatDoesWrittenOfferValid
It would also be possible to die from old age before completing the three circumnavigations. The Concorde wasn't built in a time when energy conservation was a goal.
Considering the F-22 is the first (and only?) airplane capable of supersonic speeds without the use of afterburners (or some sort of rocket technology), it's not surprising that the Concorde needs a lot of gas.
Because certain types of copies are allowed. For instance, you're allowed to have a copy of a program on your hard drive and in RAM. You can have a copy sitting in a hard drive cache. The intent behind copyright is that you purchase it for a purpose (and likely the DJs had to purchase a more expensive version that allows public performance) and you can use it for that purpose.
I've always thought the music industry should have to pick. Either they can sell you a physical media with which you can do whatever you want (public performances or personal use) or sell you a license to use the music in a certain way (private use only, but you have the right to the music in any format you want for that purpose).
Two cards - four cores.
The GPL really doesn't need to be tested in court. As it relies on copyright, if you don't obey the requirements of the license, you fall back to the default constraints of any copyrighted work -- namely you can't distribute it.
Exactly. That's why they're not going to do this. They don't want you knowing that they know who you are. Unless of course they know you know they know who you are.