Wow, you are so brave on the internet. Why don't yo post your address and then we will see how brave you will are.
after it posted to the Web in June thousands of detailed photos taken along county roads.... Sonoma County's most isolated roads and look at some of its most secluded homes.
Isolate and secluded does not also mean "owned by the county".
I also notice that in this part:
Up a single-lane road outside Freestone, Google went past a gate with a "no trespassing" sign and captured images on private property. Several residences can be seen on the property, including an up-close shot of someone's living room window.
there is no quote from the residents, nor any mention of the reporter talking to them. For all you or the report knows, permission had been given. In fact, without mention of who owned the property or where it is, there is no way to verify the claim in the article. In fact, that property could be owned by Google, or the person who drives the car.
Oh, and look up the word "fascist" in a dictionary, dumbass.
I really, really hate your freedom
Yes, I know. That is what makes you a worthless, self-righteous, totalitarian who would murder anyone who disagrees with anything you say or whom you just don't like. What is it like being the same as Pol Pot, Stalin, Milosevic, Hussein, and Idi Amin? What is it like knowing you are just like all the vicious murders who take power?
You talk like you hate those sorts of people, but I think you only hate them because they are just like you. Or, is it just because you can't rape and kill? I bet that is your fantasy, to have your own rape room where you can rape, torture, and murder those who disagree with you. It seems about your speed.
Now, why don't you take that shotgun you mentioned in your other post and blow whatever you use for brains out.
Nice to see the true colors of your liberal beliefs. The politics of hate and murder. I bet you are one of the assholes who think it is ok to "wander" or even break into someone else's computer because it isn't locked down against every conceivable threat.
Oh, and you do understand that no one entered anyone's house, don't you, shithead?
You are a pathetic, little pussy who probably can't even lift a shotgun, let alone fire it accurately. Now, go back to your drug and you kiddie porn, you pathetic dog fucker.
Actually, you are wrong about constitutionality isuses. Laws were passed that defined drugs that were illegal in the United States. The laws written and defended using the both the Commerce Clause (transporting across state lines) and the General Welfare clause.
There is no problem reconciling the Commerce clause with either of those amendments, especially the 10th because it is a power delegated to the United States.
You don't seem to have a very good grasp of what the Constitution actually says.
Why should I? I don't know for certain that they trespassed. For all I know, they actually obtained permission, and the pothead forgot about it, as potheads are apt to do.
No, you worthless fuck, it applies to the fucking law. Shitheads like yourself are the ones who think and act like only the laws you like should apply.
Now, stop being a lying hypocrite and go die in a fire.
Irrelevant, actually. Plain sight only applies to police making searches.
If Google, et. al. trespassed, the images of the plants is evidence of the trespass. As long as the police didn't ask Google to go looking or to trespass and look, the evidence does not have to be in plain sight.
Fail. It is not fruit of a poisonous tree because the police neither asked nor encouraged google to take the pictures.
If the evidence of one crime is found in the commission of a second crime, that evidence can still be used because the evidence would be evidence of both the second and first crimes.
Federal law generally trumps state law. Marijuana is a drug and is covered under federal law where it is illegal. Growing and using marijuana is not a thought crime. Trying to lie and say it is a thought crime is disingenuous.
You call this activism? I call it harrasment, immoral, and unethical. I call it rude and stupid.
I like the way you have a double standard for DoS. It is OK in meatspace but wrong in cyberspace.
Maybe Apple should send out an email or just post on their website how the FSF decided to hurt Apple's customers and ask that people not support the FSF in any way.
The assholes doing this don't care about that. They think they will impress Apple by wasting time and money. They think they will influence Apple's customers and bring the customers to their side.
Basically, the people doing this are self-righteous, arrogant, stupid assholes.
And, unlike so many who support them, and some of those who oppose them, I am willing to stand behind my words because I am not a coward, anonymous or otherwise.
Slashdot Mirror
What ever it is, it still looks like OS by FischerPrice to me. Of course, I could say the same about XP, Vista, and pretty much every other OS.
Why do they all look like they were designed for 4yos?
Here, you dropped this:
L
Well, he could have insomnia.
Let me introduce you to the sea floor.
Wow, you are so brave on the internet. Why don't yo post your address and then we will see how brave you will are.
after it posted to the Web in June thousands of detailed photos taken along county roads. ...
Sonoma County's most isolated roads and look at some of its most secluded homes.
Isolate and secluded does not also mean "owned by the county".
I also notice that in this part:
Up a single-lane road outside Freestone, Google went past a gate with a "no trespassing" sign and captured images on private property. Several residences can be seen on the property, including an up-close shot of someone's living room window.
there is no quote from the residents, nor any mention of the reporter talking to them. For all you or the report knows, permission had been given. In fact, without mention of who owned the property or where it is, there is no way to verify the claim in the article. In fact, that property could be owned by Google, or the person who drives the car.
Oh, and look up the word "fascist" in a dictionary, dumbass.
I really, really hate your freedom
Yes, I know. That is what makes you a worthless, self-righteous, totalitarian who would murder anyone who disagrees with anything you say or whom you just don't like. What is it like being the same as Pol Pot, Stalin, Milosevic, Hussein, and Idi Amin? What is it like knowing you are just like all the vicious murders who take power?
You talk like you hate those sorts of people, but I think you only hate them because they are just like you. Or, is it just because you can't rape and kill? I bet that is your fantasy, to have your own rape room where you can rape, torture, and murder those who disagree with you. It seems about your speed.
Now, why don't you take that shotgun you mentioned in your other post and blow whatever you use for brains out.
Nice to see the true colors of your liberal beliefs. The politics of hate and murder. I bet you are one of the assholes who think it is ok to "wander" or even break into someone else's computer because it isn't locked down against every conceivable threat.
Oh, and you do understand that no one entered anyone's house, don't you, shithead?
You are a pathetic, little pussy who probably can't even lift a shotgun, let alone fire it accurately. Now, go back to your drug and you kiddie porn, you pathetic dog fucker.
Do you have proof that they broke the law?
Please explain in detail how this law is not just.
Actually, you are wrong about constitutionality isuses. Laws were passed that defined drugs that were illegal in the United States. The laws written and defended using the both the Commerce Clause (transporting across state lines) and the General Welfare clause.
There is no problem reconciling the Commerce clause with either of those amendments, especially the 10th because it is a power delegated to the United States.
You don't seem to have a very good grasp of what the Constitution actually says.
Oh, so you are growing pot on your property. I will be sure to let your local DEA agents know.
Why should I? I don't know for certain that they trespassed. For all I know, they actually obtained permission, and the pothead forgot about it, as potheads are apt to do.
You have a stupidity problem.
No, you worthless fuck, it applies to the fucking law. Shitheads like yourself are the ones who think and act like only the laws you like should apply.
Now, stop being a lying hypocrite and go die in a fire.
Irrelevant, actually. Plain sight only applies to police making searches.
If Google, et. al. trespassed, the images of the plants is evidence of the trespass. As long as the police didn't ask Google to go looking or to trespass and look, the evidence does not have to be in plain sight.
Fail.
It is not fruit of a poisonous tree because the police neither asked nor encouraged google to take the pictures.
If the evidence of one crime is found in the commission of a second crime, that evidence can still be used because the evidence would be evidence of both the second and first crimes.
Nice, what is the view like from inside your colon?
Federal trumps state.
Yes, but that is a different subject
Federal law generally trumps state law.
Marijuana is a drug and is covered under federal law where it is illegal.
Growing and using marijuana is not a thought crime. Trying to lie and say it is a thought crime is disingenuous.
You are a lying, self-serving, asshole.
People who are busy breaking the law might get in trouble because of Google Streetview.
Here is an interesting idea: Don't break the fucking law.
You call this activism? I call it harrasment, immoral, and unethical. I call it rude and stupid.
I like the way you have a double standard for DoS. It is OK in meatspace but wrong in cyberspace.
Maybe Apple should send out an email or just post on their website how the FSF decided to hurt Apple's customers and ask that people not support the FSF in any way.
It doesn't work because #1 is false for most people.
That reminds me. I need to run over some Critical Mass bike riders on Friday.
The assholes doing this don't care about that. They think they will impress Apple by wasting time and money. They think they will influence Apple's customers and bring the customers to their side.
Basically, the people doing this are self-righteous, arrogant, stupid assholes.
And, unlike so many who support them, and some of those who oppose them, I am willing to stand behind my words because I am not a coward, anonymous or otherwise.
If you care so much and have done so much, why are you posting anonymously?