Slashdot Mirror


MacBook Updates Rumored To Include Glass Trackpad

CWmike writes to tell us that Seth Weintraub has been hearing some interesting rumors surrounding the next iteration of Apple's MacBook line. "I have been hearing some interesting things about Apple's upcoming line of portable computers. The talk amongst insiders on the new MacBooks is kind of scattered but here's a summation of what I've heard: The new models are thinner than current MacBook and MacBook Pros and slightly more rounded, taking design cues from the MacBook Air; the trackpad is glass, multi-touch and uses gestures. The screen isn't multi-touch; the body is manufactured out of one piece of aluminum. Eco-friendly, yet sturdy. Manufacturing process is completely different; the release date will be in the last weeks of September."

273 comments

  1. I don't get it... by Otter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Eco-friendly, yet sturdy.

    What makes this "eco-friendly"? The glass trackpad? The "manufactured out of one piece of aluminum"?

    1. Re:I don't get it... by Shivetya · · Score: 4, Insightful

      they paid off the right groups

      -or-

      realistically they know what words sell.

      --
      * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    2. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      But "OOK! It's shiny!!"

    3. Re:I don't get it... by martinw89 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ah, you accidentally looked over the fact that it runs on new Ego(TM) power, not electricity. Common mistake.

    4. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The plastic sticker on the box. It wasn't tested on animals, contains zero trans fats and opposes the war in Iraq.

    5. Re:I don't get it... by jgtg32a · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They are most likely going on about the more energy efficient processors.

    6. Re:I don't get it... by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Apparently the materials used to make the Air are relatively environmentally friendly, and this sounds similar, so they extrapolated.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    7. Re:I don't get it... by etnoy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apparently the materials used to make the Air are relatively environmentally friendly

      Duh. It's made of air

      --
      Quantum hacker.
    8. Re:I don't get it... by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Here, you dropped this:

      L

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    9. Re:I don't get it... by Coopjust · · Score: 3, Funny

      Here, you dropped this:

      Not necessarily, he could be a monkey.

    10. Re:I don't get it... by ethanms · · Score: 2, Funny

      What makes this "eco-friendly"?

      Al Gore is on their board of directors... therefore everything they make is automatically considered to be eco-friendly...

      Just like Al Gore's giant house w/ huge power consumption bills... b-b-b-but I was spending that power on computing climate models to prove what horrible polluters American's are!

    11. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think they made a typo.

      Ego-friendly*

    12. Re:I don't get it... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      My guess it is the aluminum that is "eco-friendly" Aluminum is super easy to recycle compared to plastic but then so is glass.
      Not a lot of other info so it is all guess work at this time.
      Now to make it really "eco-friendly" they should promise to support it with ten years and promise that all future versions of OS/X for the next ten years will run on it.
      Not going to happen but I would so love to see the end of disposable computers.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    13. Re:I don't get it... by ksheff · · Score: 1

      the guys shuffling around down pushing shopping carts full of cans are going to be after your MacBook now.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    14. Re:I don't get it... by Bovarchist · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't think The Librarian would post AC.

      --
      Hell is other people's code.
    15. Re:I don't get it... by imcleod · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not necessarily, he could be a monkey.

      You mean orangutan. NEVER call him a monkey.

    16. Re:I don't get it... by nategoose · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not made of dolphins.

    17. Re:I don't get it... by doombringerltx · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Lately they've been using core2 desktop processors and not mobile chips in their laptops and are still hailed as being ecofriendly. I doubt for the next gen they will be using intel Atom or the AMD turion chips, or anything else thats actually geared towards being an energy efficent mobile chip. Now a days being "eco-friendly" is just pointing to one or two places where you are saving the enviroment. I could ship people huge bags of thallium, mercury and dead baby condors and still be hailed as eco-friendly as long as the packaging was recycled.

    18. Re:I don't get it... by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 2, Funny

      You can thank your sig for inspiring this:

      from ego import *
       
      Jobs.ego = Ego()
       
      while True:
          jobs.ego *= 2

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    19. Re:I don't get it... by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      Thought about the same thing.
      Is aluminium more environmentally friendly to produce than other materials used in laptops?
      Or is it the process of making it out of one piece of aluminium as opposed to using several pieces of aluminium? =/

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
    20. Re:I don't get it... by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Obligatory Bender quote "Bite my shiny metal ass!"

    21. Re:I don't get it... by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Lately they've been using core2 desktop processors and not mobile chips [...]

      What ?

    22. Re:I don't get it... by Shade+of+Pyrrhus · · Score: 2, Funny

      New, more eco-friendly version! Doesn't come with a box or plastic sticker!

    23. Re:I don't get it... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      It's eco-friendly because it's nice an light so a hermit crab will be able to use it as a home when it becomes out dated and chucked in the ocean.

    24. Re:I don't get it... by moosesocks · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ook?

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    25. Re:I don't get it... by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      You forgot the joint endorsement from Al Gore and Barack Obama.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    26. Re:I don't get it... by wondershit · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or maybe it was the beginning of a program.

    27. Re:I don't get it... by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1, Funny

      %$#@&*(@%$#

      _Now_, over an hour after I post, I see the capitalization error. ARGH.

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    28. Re:I don't get it... by tmalone · · Score: 2, Funny

      The harddrives in old MacBooks were lubricated with Dolphin oil. It's one of those things that makes a Mac different from a PC. Shit, now I may as well buy a Dell.

    29. Re:I don't get it... by orbitor · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think this puts your theories to rest.

    30. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't get all excited, it's hot air.

    31. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just an Ook programmer.

    32. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cut from a single piece of aluminum should mean less machining and waste pieces to toss/recast. Meaning less energy used to make the product and less waste :)

    33. Re:I don't get it... by BurningFeetMan · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium_smelting

      An aluminium smelter uses prodigious amounts of electricity; they tend to be located very close to large power stations.

    34. Re:I don't get it... by AshtangiMan · · Score: 1

      That's a good question, and I wondered too. Lately though (past decade or so), I've heard Aluminum touted as eco friendly because it is very cheap and easy to recycle (compared with steel recycling it is cheaper and it is way cheaper than making new aluminum). So the current situation is that we have a lot of aluminum that is unused after its first life (say as a soda can, or siding, or an airplane fuselage). In that way it may be better than plastic (that is a debatable point), and better than those steel and titanium laptops that are so chic right now.

    35. Re:I don't get it... by dotBran · · Score: 1

      Eco-friendly, yet sturdy.

      What makes this "eco-friendly"? The glass trackpad? The "manufactured out of one piece of aluminum"?

      1. All of Apple's products are RoHS compliant, and if not, the only shortcomings are the graphics cards. I think.
      2. The aluminum is recycled soda cans.

    36. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eco-friendly, yet sturdy.

      What makes this "eco-friendly"? The glass trackpad? The "manufactured out of one piece of aluminum"?

      Easy to recycle. Iron would be another easy to recycle material but a little heavy for notebooks. It doesn't have to be made out of compressed bamboo to be ecofriendly. I think the point it it's more ecofriendly than their previous model. With notebooks I'd guess plastic is the worst because it's doubtful any of the plastic is recycled on old notebooks but aluminum has value and would be more worthwhile to recycle. The real point is ecofriendly and electronics don't really go together. They take vast amounts of energy to make for their size and contain lots of toxic materials. Even back in the vacuum tube days they contained a lot of lead and toxic metals.

    37. Re:I don't get it... by H0p313ss · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not necessarily, he could be a monkey.

      You mean orangutan. NEVER call him a monkey.

      Good thing I wasn't drinking or you'd owe me a new keyboard!

      For those not following along at home:

      The Librarian

      The Librarian is known for his violent reaction whenever he hears anyone refer to him as a "monkey" (orangutans are apes). He speaks an elaborate language whose vocabulary consists of the single word Ook (and its antonym "eek" - where "ook" means yes, "eek" tends to mean no). Nonetheless, most people seem to be able to understand him. Both his language and his reaction were used separately and together as jokes in the first Discworld game.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    38. Re:I don't get it... by AshtangiMan · · Score: 1

      True about the smelting. But the thing you are glossing over is that there are vast amounts of aluminum scraps ready to be recycled. Recycling aluminum is very easy, that is, it uses far less energy than it does to make it in the first place or than it does to recycle steel. Aluminum has a pretty low melting point, I could google for it I suppose, but IIRC its 1700 F or so.

    39. Re:I don't get it... by BurningFeetMan · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they'd use recycled aluminium then? Dare I say that they'll be using what ever is cheapest and easiest, with the environment in the back of everyone's mind as always. Right in the back, as far back as you can possibly go.

      Designers can always look at alternatives to aluminium, such as shiny plastic. I've no idea which one is more "Eco-friendly" though.

    40. Re:I don't get it... by dotBran · · Score: 1

      Yes, air filled with CO2.

    41. Re:I don't get it... by dotBran · · Score: 1

      D= I love the stickers, though! What else can I sabotage Dell kiosks with?

    42. Re:I don't get it... by bill_kress · · Score: 1

      I believe eco-friendly usually has to do with the materials used in the circuit board. It wouldn't have anything to do with the stuff listed (although the one piece of aluminum would be extremely recyclable, much more than plastic, that could actually be quite a bit of it!).

    43. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terry Pratchett ftw.

    44. Re:I don't get it... by hotfireball · · Score: 1

      What makes this "eco-friendly"? The glass trackpad? The "manufactured out of one piece of aluminum"?

      OSX. Because with Linux or Windows user will be irritated, cursing, then get mad and go ballistic. As a consequence, he will axe environment, furniture, nature, trees, kill dogs, kick cats, spit on people, rape women and burn rubber. :-)

    45. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Original AC here. I think you need to expand your reading a bit - see other comments. (I was getting worried, but no, TP readers are still alive!)

    46. Re:I don't get it... by Cairnarvon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Higher power consumption != less eco-friendly. Gore's house has a much, much lower carbon footprint than the average American home because he gets nearly all of that energy he uses from solar and geothermal sources. Much of the reason that bill you're referring to was so high is because he's paying a premium to get his energy from clean sources.
      Maybe you were just trying to make an innocent joke, but that meme needs to die.

      Gore isn't saying everyone needs to cut their energy consumption down to zero, he's saying people need to make an effort to be carbon-neutral, and he's making that effort himself.

    47. Re:I don't get it... by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 0, Troll

      Gore isn't saying everyone needs to cut their energy consumption down to zero, he's saying people need to make an effort to be carbon-neutral, and he's making that effort himself.
      By flying on a private plane to do so, but it's ok b/c Gore is rich and can afford indulgences^H^H^H^H^H err, offsetting carbon credits.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    48. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That wikipedia link is a waste of time. In the "Three hours of fascinated clicking later..." sense.

      Oh sure, you'll all probably mod ME off topic...

    49. Re:I don't get it... by Zymergy · · Score: 1

      Maybe because both Glass and Aluminum are 100% recyclable??
      Because Apples grow on trees?

    50. Re:I don't get it... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You read TP? I suppose it saves you taking a newspaper or book in there with you...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    51. Re:I don't get it... by SolusSD · · Score: 1

      The fact it is made out of aluminum instead of plastic. Aluminum is plentiful, infinitely recyclable, and damn slick looking.

    52. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it is manufactured out of one piece of aluminum, it cannot be opened. Hence you cannot turn it on, and hence it is eco-friendly.

    53. Re:I don't get it... by mc900ftjesus · · Score: 1

      Nothing about Apple is ego-friendly.

    54. Re:I don't get it... by kigrwik · · Score: 2, Funny

      It would seem a bit of an overkill to run all /. posts through pylint, though.

      --
      -- don't discount flying pigs until you have good air defense
    55. Re:I don't get it... by AshtangiMan · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that most aluminum stuff is from mostly recycled aluminum . . . similar to steel. But I have nothing to back that up, except that it would be easier and cheaper to use recycled aluminum as it is a "local resource" almost everywhere. You are right about the environment in the back of everyone's mind, behind profit, convenience, and almost everything else.

    56. Re:I don't get it... by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      I could ship people huge bags of thallium, mercury and dead baby condors and still be hailed as eco-friendly as long as the packaging was recycled.

      Unfortunately this is all too true. For instance GE, with it's Ecomagination campaign is trying to greenwash it's image. However what you won't hear from them is how they're trying to work on the Three Gorges Dam which will forcibly displace millions of Chinese and submerge a lot of land, graves, and archaeological sites.

      Falcon

    57. Re:I don't get it... by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Not going to happen but I would so love to see the end of disposable computers.

      I would like to see an end to disposable computers as well, unfortunately I love my MacBook Pro.

      Falcon

  2. Yeah... by Wiarumas · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...but can it run Linux?

    God, sorry people.

    --
    I will bend like a reed in the wind.
    1. Re:Yeah... by e2d2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes. Yes it can actually.

  3. An iPhone screen for a trackpad? by smitty97 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hope under the glass trackpad there's a little display just like the iPhone's.

    --
    mod me funny
    1. Re:An iPhone screen for a trackpad? by LordKaT · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why, so you can glance up and down constantly to see what you're doing, and then curse occasionally as you press the wrong spot on the trackpad and open several programs at once?

    2. Re:An iPhone screen for a trackpad? by vslashg · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hope under the glass trackpad there's a little display just like the iPhone's.

      Presenting the new smitty97 MacBook Touch.

    3. Re:An iPhone screen for a trackpad? by brendank310 · · Score: 1

      I think it would be kind of cool to have a screen there, or even just along the bottom of the glass, that had the dock replicated in some fashion. You could just tap on the application and bring it up.

    4. Re:An iPhone screen for a trackpad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will probably be about as useless/eye-candyish as an Optimus.

    5. Re:An iPhone screen for a trackpad? by czmax · · Score: 1

      - So I'd have a convenient location to display all the system monitoring stuff I like to run.

      - So I could display videos I'm only 'sorta' watching

      - Because it would be cool

      - (make one up)

  4. Glass trackpad? by rtechie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What are the advantages of a glass trackpad? Wouldn't your finger stick to it?

    1. Re:Glass trackpad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It would be either film-coated glass or applique-covered glass. There's no way they'd let you actually TOUCH raw glass. That would be stupid.

    2. Re:Glass trackpad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can see your own miserable reflection

    3. Re:Glass trackpad? by adisakp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What are the advantages of a glass trackpad?

      Bling factor! It looks and feels more "expensive" not to mention the glass is harder so it won't scratch with use. Most trackpads kinda feel like a cheap vinyl / plastic sheet and get "wear" marks in the pad from finger friction after a couple months use..

      Wouldn't your finger stick to it?

      I'd think that getting fingerprints all over a shiny glossy surface that you are meant to touch all the time would be a bigger issue.

    4. Re:Glass trackpad? by wazzzup · · Score: 1

      As an owner of a few Apple laptops in my day I can say that the initial smooth surface of the trackpads wear off over time and whatever material is underneath, while functional, isn't as smooth making usage of the trackpad for long sessions uncomfortable. Your fingertips feel slightly "raw" after a while.

      I would imagine glass doesn't have this issue.

    5. Re:Glass trackpad? by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      I don't see the advantage either. Even if it's coated to make it slicker... what happens when the coating wears through? Then you've got a "rough" spot? If I can wear out mouse feet and mouse pads, I can certainly wear out a trackpad coating. Besides, aside from typical Apple "oooh shiny" reasoning, is there a reason to reinvent the wheel here? I've never had any trouble with any old touchpads.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    6. Re:Glass trackpad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Wouldn't your finger stick to it?

      Only if your finger is covered with glue. Seriously have you never tried the demo units (iPod Touch, iPhone) at an Apple Store?

    7. Re:Glass trackpad? by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Funny

      The superior solution is obviously the clit mouse.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    8. Re:Glass trackpad? by rtechie · · Score: 1

      Yeah. My fingers stick to those. It's very difficult to do any sort of "sliding" motion. I found scrolling near-impossible on iPhones for this reason. Putting rubbing alcohol on my fingers (to dry them out) helped quite a bit. And when I used a little stylus, everything worked perfectly. But the idea of a touchpad that requires a stylus seems... odd to me.

    9. Re:Glass trackpad? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      What are the advantages of a glass trackpad? Wouldn't your finger stick to it?

      They could put a miniature display in it, so you'd have a contextual touch-screen.

    10. Re:Glass trackpad? by BasilBrush · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bullshit. Styli don't function on the iPhone, only fingers. Why make things up?

    11. Re:Glass trackpad? by cnettel · · Score: 1

      Maybe with Apple machines. For some reason, I can't stand the trackpad on my MacBook for any prolonged time (maybe it's really the keyboard, as I generally use either external KB + mouse, or internal KB + trackpad). Therefore, it hasn't really been heavily used. My last two portable PCs were used for 4 years each. The trackpad surface never gave me any problems, and it was used heavily on both. (The last one was a Dell Inspiron 8600.)

    12. Re:Glass trackpad? by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      This is interesting. Although I've seen quite a few worn-down touchpads (especially on Dells), the one on my 12" Powerbook's looks pretty much just like new after 3 years of heavy use.

      I wonder if Apple use different materials for touchpads on their "Pro" line than they do on their cheaper consumer-grade stuff.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    13. Re:Glass trackpad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The ordinary plastic kind don't work, but a capacitive stylus will.

    14. Re:Glass trackpad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if they roughen up the surface I would assume the current plastic surface is also rough. Btw I really wonder why the do not offer a roughened up (say non-glossy) lcd for the MacBook like they do for the Pro. That would be a great upgrade.

    15. Re:Glass trackpad? by astrosmash · · Score: 1

      What are the advantages of a glass trackpad? Wouldn't your finger stick to it?

      The problem the existing Apple trackpads is that their textured metal surface quick wears down to something that's very smooth and sticky, which is not ideal.

      Presumably, a textured glass surface would solve that problem quite handily.

      --
      ENDUT! HOCH HECH!
    16. Re:Glass trackpad? by Tragek · · Score: 1

      Odd my macbook trackpad was originally slightly textured, and now is very smooth...

    17. Re:Glass trackpad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The superior solution is obviously the clit mouse.

      Reduces required finger movement exponentially! :)

    18. Re:Glass trackpad? by Blackstealth · · Score: 1

      Same here, the trackpad on my 1st-gen Alu 15" Powerbook is still like new and it's been heavily used for almost 5yrs now.

    19. Re:Glass trackpad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and get "wear" marks in the pad from finger friction after a couple months use..

      So did my girlfriend in high school.

    20. Re:Glass trackpad? by fast+turtle · · Score: 1

      Business Card/Biometric Scanner (fingerprint reader)

      --
      Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
    21. Re:Glass trackpad? by daybot · · Score: 1

      What are the advantages of a glass trackpad? Wouldn't your finger stick to it?

      I've wanted a glass trackpad on my laptop since I got an iPhone - it would feel great to use, be easy to clean, reliable and most of all hard-wearing.

  5. Re:How Did This Make It To The Front Page? by sexconker · · Score: 3, Informative

    Since when was /. (officially) devoted to Linux/open source?

  6. How about adding A bigger screen and video cards.. by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    How about adding A bigger screen and video cards $1500 for a 13" screen and Intel GMA when there are 15" laptops with geforce 9700 and 4gb of ram at $1,249.99
    http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=8906133&type=product&id=1213046768588

    $2000 just to get a 15" bigger screen and 8600gt 256 with only 2GB memory?

    $2,499.00 to get a 8600gt 512 with 2GB memory?

    $2,799.00 for a 17" screen and still only 2GB memory?

  7. Glass? Eww, eww, eww, eww by Sockatume · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've used a few touchpads in my time, and the bad ones are the ones that either started off glossy, or became glossy because of wear. I'm fine with using glossy touch-screens for tapping around or stylus work, but trying to operate one as a mouse for a long period of time gets immensely annoying. The slightest bit of sweat on my fingertips makes them stick and stutter across.

    I've not used an iPhone or iPod touch for long, but I got the impression that they were designed to favour short finger motions on the pad for precisely this reason. I'm not sure it would translate well into a touchpad.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    1. Re:Glass? Eww, eww, eww, eww by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've not used an iPhone or iPod touch for long, but I got the impression that they were designed to favour short finger motions on the pad for precisely this reason.

      I have to say, I've had an iPhone for a year. At first I was skeptical of the glass because of fingerprints, etc, but in practice I never notice any smudges, and I've *never* had any skipping, etc. In fact, it's remarkably precise, considering the blunt nature of a fingertip.

      My theory on the way it works is that it finds the centroid of the pressure region. I've used drawing applications with it, and it's actually amazing how well it works drawing thin lines with a fingertip.

      I don't know about a multitouch touchpad, that seems kind of lame. What makes multitouch cool is touching directly on the screen.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    2. Re:Glass? Eww, eww, eww, eww by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      I meant, my finger itself stutters across the surface of some touchpads because it sticks to the glossy material. However it sounds from your description like that's not as much of an issue on an actual glass surface, as opposed to glossy plastics.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    3. Re:Glass? Eww, eww, eww, eww by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Modern touchpads don't function with pressure but sense the capacitance of your finger. Just sliding along the srface is enough. That helps deal with skipping.

    4. Re:Glass? Eww, eww, eww, eww by seinman · · Score: 1

      Does anyone else miss the old pressure-based trackpads? I had one of the original Toughbooks and it had one of these, I could use it with a stylus. Made my Photoshop work so much easier without having to buy (and then travel with and try to use in space-restrained situations) a separate drawing tablet. You'd think Apple, trying to sell to the artistic crowd, would offer this as an option.

    5. Re:Glass? Eww, eww, eww, eww by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Informative

      All the current MBPs have multitouch track pads. They're quite nice. When I use my old MBP I really miss the reverse-pinch gesture to increase the font size in Safari.

      Multitouch on the track pad isn't nearly as cool as directly on the screen though.

    6. Re:Glass? Eww, eww, eww, eww by hobbit · · Score: 1

      I don't know about a multitouch touchpad, that seems kind of lame. What makes multitouch cool is touching directly on the screen.

      As someone who can't stand it when I use an older iBook and can't use two fingers across the trackpad to scroll through pages of Slashdot comments, I disagree!

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
  8. Touchscreen by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 1

    If you want a real revolution, simply making the screen a *touchscreen* would be great, not trying to change the surface material of the touchpad, which people generally hate anyway...

    1. Re:Touchscreen by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Only if it is going to be a tablet.
      I don't want to move my hands that far from the keyboard plus I don't think multi-touch would be all that good for graphics programs.
      Now what would rock is a tablet With an external monitor.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Touchscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      touchscreens works damn well on things like the iphone or kiosks. but as the default pointer input on a laptop? suck.

      that's a 12-17 inch screen you have to move your hand across just to control the pointer... so unless the majority of your apps are entirely pointer driven it's gonna be usability hell. same reason i think tablets aren't that great, useful in very specific situations. (using it like a digital notepad and such).

    3. Re:Touchscreen by Duradin · · Score: 5, Informative

      Look up touchscreen gorilla arm.

      That's why touch screens are not great and won't cause a revolution.

    4. Re:Touchscreen by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 1

      Well... that was implicit... Didn't look like it, but it was ;-)

    5. Re:Touchscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you just tell us? Does it involve Mac users having a disproportionately large right arm and hairy palms? Have you experienced any problems with touching, yourself?

  9. Tough one... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've really been trying to figure it out, but I can't. If it does have a second LCD in the trackpad as smitty97 speculates, it sure won't be more eco-friendly:

    http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2008/07/04/lcd-greenhouse-gas-worries/1

    Also if it has a 1-piece aluminum chassis, it will be more difficult to repair, therefore more likely to be replaced, therefore more hardware going into landfills, therefore less eco-friendly. The case itself is sturdier but if it's one hard piece of aluminum, the internals will take more damage and the case will take less. Again, less eco-friendly. A good case for preventing damage would be a replaceable one made of thin, soft metal.

    Also getting the parts inside such a case would be a nightmare...I guess the screen would have a slit on the bottom where the internals are inserted and then clipped into place, and the body would just have removable bays as usual, but then the mobo and keyboard would be non-replaceable.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Tough one... by retchdog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      These are Apple products anyway. Out of the past 100 distinct Apple notebooks I've seen (trust me, I am not exaggerating here) in the past year, maybe five of them were not brand new MacBooks or MBPs. Admittedly, the G4s are extra-old-and-busted (biggest waste of my money ever...), but it seems that people buy new Apple computers with their spring shopping anyway.

      And they can finally get full benefit from their inflated RAM and HD prices. Ballsy move, if true, but it will probably work out.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    2. Re:Tough one... by ksheff · · Score: 1

      I would think the internals would be damaged more by a thin soft case than by a sturdy one. Panasonic would love to know how they got their ToughBook totally wrong if that was the case. Once a macbook is considered DOA, someone can rip out the circuit boards, throw the AL case in one pile that goes to the scrap metal yard, the screen & trackpad cover in a pile to go to the glass recycler.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    3. Re:Tough one... by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would think the internals would be damaged more by a thin soft case than by a sturdy one.

      There needs to be a happy medium. Most damage to a notebook with be blunt-force, not sharp-pointy. As long as the energy from a fall is used up in deforming the exterior, the interior will take less damage. If the exterior is made of diamond, the interior will slam into the diamond exterior with the same energy as if it had hit the ground itself. Of course, if someone's stabbing your laptop, you'll want a hard case, and maybe better working/living conditions.

    4. Re:Tough one... by mjpaci · · Score: 2, Informative

      Aluminum is very recyclable. I really doubt many Aluminum chasis make it past the sorters and into a landfill. Hell, Al cans vanish out of my recycling bin before the truck even gets there. It's magic!

    5. Re:Tough one... by ksheff · · Score: 3, Insightful

      AL will flex some, but I don't think they are trying to protect against a stabbing (although that could be a design consideration for the UK) as much as someone accidentally stepping on it, being pressed up against another hard object in book bag, vehicle storage, etc. Shocks from drops can be addressed with a dampening material at the circuit board mounting points.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    6. Re:Tough one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I disagree...

      I work at an Apple Store (therefor the AC, and obviously take what I say with a grain of salt as I'm as much a fanboi as the best of em').

      From everyone's perspective, having repairs done in larger part replacements are much better. There is one flaw with your statement. The large replaced part isn't just thrown away, but rather can be refurbished.

      Consider an LCD display on a laptop. We'll low-ball and say there are 7 individual replaceable parts and cables. Brick and Mortar big box retail stores get shipments from all shipping companies for all different purposes from all over the globe. With Air and Ground shipping for say 4 failed parts in an LCD panel (say it's a liquid damaged LCD) and you get shipments from DHL, UPS, and FedEx delivering all of your parts over a period of 3 days. Now, if you only have to order a monitor clam-shell instead of 4 different parts, you have 1 shipment on 1 single day. When you are sending parts back to be refurbed or recycled or trashed, you are sending a single item as opposed to several different packages. From an inventory standpoint this means MUCH less paperwork per shipment and less boxes/packing material being used to ship and be trashed/recycled.

      For users, repairs can be done faster. (If repairs can be done while customer waits, only one car trip out to store)

      For retail stores, more repairs can be done in-store. This means fewer repairs will be packaged and shipped out to repair centers.

      I just don't see how single part replacements are bad. This allows Apple to help end users more effectively. It takes less shipping and packing, and as I've understood eco-matters (and I won't pretend to be the brightest bulb on the matter), air cargo and travel are pretty big carbon emitters. Apple can then refurb/recycle the part in a larger warehouse environment that is more adept at repairing the individual components of the larger part.

      Any-hoo... just my $0.04

    7. Re:Tough one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Actually you'll want a chainmail case.

    8. Re:Tough one... by eiapoce · · Score: 1

      Actually... the plastics on the Macbook line are very prone to damage, so prone that they are exchanged under the applecare warranty, no question asked.

      I already ditched 2 keyboards and one bottom case from my macbook... I think that aluminium could be more eco-friendly in this case... specially because it can be recycled with ease.

    9. Re:Tough one... by GeekDork · · Score: 4, Informative

      Also if it has a 1-piece aluminum chassis, it will be more difficult to repair, therefore more likely to be replaced, therefore more hardware going into landfills, therefore less eco-friendly. The case itself is sturdier but if it's one hard piece of aluminum, the internals will take more damage and the case will take less. Again, less eco-friendly. A good case for preventing damage would be a replaceable one made of thin, soft metal.

      I disagree. An eco-friendly case would ironically be made from plastic, or if necessary some GRP or CFRP. Metal and glass, to use terms of trade, need shitloads of energy to manufacture, and the process is highly lossy. We don't even want to get started about how aluminium is extracted from the ore in the first place, or that a rather rare resource is needlessly wasted. Plastic can be molded to almost the final shape in a single pass, with a relatively low amount of energy (some heat and a vacuum pump).

      All that "metal is good for the environment" is bullshit. It's good for marketing, because a laptop that feels like you could use it as a blunt weapon just feels better than "cheap" plastic. And even in that area, I'd put a lot of trust into some CFRP. It's effectively stronger and lighter than aluminium.

      --

      Fight hunger. Filet a politician and send him to a 3rd world country of your choice.

    10. Re:Tough one... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Aluminum is easily recycled and doesn't really involve many toxic chemicals in it's manufacture (except for a boat load of electricity, which is usually provided by hydro dams). The polycarbonate that makes up most notebooks isn't so easily recycled and the process to make it isn't quite as clean.

    11. Re:Tough one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok for one, the "eco-friendly" movement is only white guilt. China and the rest of the manufacturing world don't give a CRAP about eco-friendly. They want MONEY. White guilt ran manufacturing out of the U.S. a LONG time ago. The foriegn market has us by the short and curlies using white guilt. Screw eco-friendly. Who gives a damn if its made out of plastic, metal or ketchup. If the damn thing works and works well, buy it. quit whining about a planet that will be here LONG after you and all the other homo sapiens have gone the way of the dodo.
      You want to help the environment? pick up the walmart bags littering the freaking highway. Stop worrying about what's inside the stupid thing.

    12. Re:Tough one... by timmarhy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      err no. refineries typically have to generate their own power by coal or gas. bauxcite is typically leached using sodium hydroxide which is highly acidic and requires a disposal area for the tailings.

      i haven't worked in a refinery yet that i'd call "clean". people just need to stop falling for the stupid guilt trips about plastic

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    13. Re:Tough one... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      ...sodium hydroxide which is highly acidic...

      NaOH gives you lots of OH-, which basic, the opposite of acidic. I think perhaps the word you were looking for was "caustic", which covers both acids and bases. Otherwise, spot on.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    14. Re:Tough one... by zmollusc · · Score: 1

      Aluminium is hard, now?

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    15. Re:Tough one... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Unless it's very thin (as in ~1mm or maybe even less) it's not going to protect the laptop's internals. Actually I was thinking of aluminum as the material for a thin metal case.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    16. Re:Tough one... by timmarhy · · Score: 1

      hah yes my mistake. i have acid on the brain becuase we use 99% pure sulphuric acid where i work now.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    17. Re:Tough one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree with most of your post. I work at a shop where we deal with both Apple and Dell computers in certified warranty and non-warranty situations. Sure, we're not a "Brick and Mortar big box retail store" so I understand that your comments are not directed at me. I think that your attitude about this subject reflects either naivety or ignorance. And I will explain why this is the case in a ridiculously long critique of your post ;) .

      From everyone's perspective, having repairs done in larger part replacements are much better.

      For warranty repairs only. Otherwise, no. Read the rest of my comment for an explanation.

      There is one flaw with your statement. The large replaced part isn't just thrown away, but rather can be refurbished.

      This is true in most cases. However, your example of your spilled on LCD does not apply. This is not covered Apple's warranty. For non-warranty repairs, Apple does not return ship an LCD that's suffered a spill(and they charge you more).

      Consider an LCD display on a laptop. We'll low-ball and say there are 7 individual replaceable parts and cables. Brick and Mortar big box retail stores get shipments from all shipping companies for all different purposes from all over the globe. With Air and Ground shipping for say 4 failed parts in an LCD panel (say it's a liquid damaged LCD) and you get shipments from DHL, UPS, and FedEx delivering all of your parts over a period of 3 days. Now, if you only have to order a monitor clam-shell instead of 4 different parts, you have 1 shipment on 1 single day. When you are sending parts back to be refurbed or recycled or trashed, you are sending a single item as opposed to several different packages. From an inventory standpoint this means MUCH less paperwork per shipment and less boxes/packing material being used to ship and be trashed/recycled.

      Multiple components failing at once is almost always due to some kind of end-user damage like you used in your example. End-user damage (e.g. spill damage) is not covered by any kind of warranty(be it limited 1 year coverage or 3 year AppleCare). The only laptops that Apple currently ships an entire display for(including the housing; as opposed to just the LCD) are the MacBook Pro and the MacBook Air. With Apple's best selling laptop, the MacBook, they ship just the LCD. Out of warranty the MacBook Air's display costs almost $500 while the MacBook Pro's display is well over $800(for the 15" and more for the "17) when purchased through Apple directly. To save people money my group often needs to tear apart the display housings that were never meant to be opened(without extra time and effort) to install an LCD from eBay or another vendor. And the LCD from eBay DOES take longer to ship than the one day.

      Also, end user damage with multiple component failure is less likely than single component failure. Components with moving parts(e.g. hard drives) fail more often than people spill/drop their computers.

      In terms of "green-ness" Apple still has shit to sort out. It is almost always the case that when Apple ships multiple parts they send them all in separate boxes. If they do ship multiple boxes, they tend to be quite large (thus taking up more space in a delivery truck) than they should be. They could save money in shipping *and* be more environmentally friendly if they spent more in terms of logistics.

      Plus, from an inventory standpoint, if you are wasting time with paperwork you are way behind. Apple's service website is excellent and completely online. Most computer manufacturers are similar. It's easy in today's IT world to go paperless(and store inventory/paperwork on a private server).

      For users, repairs can be done faster. (If repairs can be done while customer waits, only one car trip out to store)

      This is true; Apple does save the customers on labor in a non-warranty repair. It also saves time

    18. Re:Tough one... by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Hey, alright, you passed Chemistry 1301 in college! Good for you.
       
      *golf clap*

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    19. Re:Tough one... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Aluminum is VERY nice for a notebook case. If it happens to be more environmentally friendly, bonus. You should try it.

      PS: environmentally friendly didn't run manufacturing out of the US. Wanting everything for the very lowest price did.

    20. Re:Tough one... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to this only 25% of Alcoa's power is self generated. They are, of course, the world's third largest producer of aluminum.

      I couldn't find exact numbers, but from this it looks like hydro power is rather important to aluminum smelting in most of the world. China is a bit of an exception, where the aluminum industry has been hampered because it has to compete with other industries for the mostly coal produced electricity. The arabian peninsula uses gas for their smelters, but then it's awfully common there. The rest of the world seems to depend mostly on hydro power.

    21. Re:Tough one... by cyfer2000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      But metal is recyclable, plastic is not really recyclable. And about 8% of our crust is aluminum, plastic is from the oil, which is disappearing quickly. You may have noticed that aluminum is extracted from the ore, but did you know how plastic become plastic?

      As carbon fiber reinforced plastic, I hope you realize that carbon fibers are made from polyacrylonitrile fibers by heating. And most CFRP products are absolutely not recyclable.

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    22. Re:Tough one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...why not just send them the whole laptop and let them do the repairs there?

      In either case I will not buy another laptop from apple if I can not buy replacement parts myself.
      The warranty is a max of 3 years (if you pay for the +2) after that point if anything breaks, even if it would have been a small and cheap component, we'd have to pay an exorbitant amount of money to fix it.

      Case in point is my old Titanium. I've had it for five years and have replaced the WiFi antenna, the hard drive and the DC-in board.. all on 3 separate occasions all after the warranty expired. If I had to purchase a single large part then I'd be SOL instead of paying $50 here and there.

      (btw. the old titanium G4 powerbooks and their 12 inch cousins had the best keyboard of any laptop I've ever used. These new power book ones suck...)

    23. Re:Tough one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if the case is made from one piece of aluminium you'd never know it was faulty because it would flip open how?

    24. Re:Tough one... by timmarhy · · Score: 1

      it's purely because they just need so much power, it's cheaper to make it yourself than upgrade the power company's lines to cope. it's like that in a lot of places

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    25. Re:Tough one... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Can't be that hard to get it from the power company if the third largest company only makes 25% of it's own electricity.

    26. Re:Tough one... by Capsaicin · · Score: 1

      But metal is recyclable, plastic is not really recyclable. And about 8% of our crust is aluminum, plastic is from the oil, which is disappearing quickly. You may have noticed that aluminum is extracted from the ore, but did you know how plastic become plastic?

      Aluminium (different spelling jurisdiction), is often described as 'solidified energy.' While it is perhaps the most plentiful metal in the world, the energy costs in producing it are so high as to render the cost of the ore is negligable. And consider that every once of oil turned into plastic (unless it is that evil biodegradable plastic) is an ounce of oil not burnt (I'm only half serious here, clearly the energy costs of producing plastic outweigh this). All in all, though I think OP isn't wrong in pointing out the eco-unfriendliness of Aluminium.

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
    27. Re:Tough one... by oblivionboy · · Score: 1

      From everyone's perspective, having repairs done in larger part replacements are much better. There is one flaw with your statement. The large replaced part isn't just thrown away, but rather can be refurbished.

      Right, just like all the iBook G3 motherboards that were replaced with more defective G3 motherboards that were replaced with more defective G3 motherboards ....ad nausium? As far as anyone can tell, none of the motherboards were reflowed to fix the chip problem. Looks, ironically, like the Nvidia problem with the G84 and G86 GPU is going to cause the a similar problem on the MBPs. Good luck with that. I'd say major land fill issue.

      At least with the old PowerBooks, you could replace things piece by piece as they were modular...

    28. Re:Tough one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or $0.08 of this hour's money.

    29. Re:Tough one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aluminium is the most common metal in the earth's crust. I fail to see how using it is wasting a 'rare resource'.

    30. Re:Tough one... by bhamlin · · Score: 1

      I am slightly frightened that this was modded "Insightful"...

    31. Re:Tough one... by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Indeed, "informative" would have been better. For an example of the destructive-protection I'm talking about: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crumple_zone The metal absorbs the energy so that the gooey nougat center of the vehicle doesn't.

    32. Re:Tough one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cue 101 posts about how "my massive truck doesn't have crumple zones and if I hit your shitty little Prius I just have to knock the bumps out of the fender" from retarded redneck fucktards.

    33. Re:Tough one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "to get started about how aluminium is extracted from the ore in the first place, or that a rather rare resource is needlessly wasted"

      Actually, aluminum is the most abundant metal in the crust of the Earth. Only silicon and oxygen are more abundant elements, which aren't metals. Thus, it ain't "rare". It does take obscene amounts of energy to extract it, but once extracted it can be recycled in that state over and over. That's what we need to work on -- better metal recovery.

    34. Re:Tough one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But metal is recyclable, plastic is not really recyclable.

      All plastic is recyclable. And, laptop computers are one of the most sited applications of recycled CFRP.

    35. Re:Tough one... by MMInterface · · Score: 1

      "plastic is from the oil, which is disappearing quickly." Don't worry, I have reserves on my face. Despite what everyone says, its a renewable resource.

    36. Re:Tough one... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Which is why Macs have such insane resale values compared to machines from other manufacturers, right?

      I think that out of the past 100 Apple notebooks you've seen, there's been a wide variety of models from the last 7 years or so, and you just couldn't tell the difference because they haven't changed the external design in a significant way for that long.

  10. Re:How Did This Make It To The Front Page? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

    since before VA LINUX bought them.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  11. Re:How about adding A bigger screen and video card by BalmyBrute · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why would you want what you payed for? Don't you enjoy being robbed? I think that the shinyness of MacBook compensates for its lack of pwnage.

  12. so much for easy HD/Memory swaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the case is one piece, say goodbye to the easy service bays for HD/Memory in the current MacBooks.

    1. Re:so much for easy HD/Memory swaps by hplus · · Score: 1

      The RAM/HD bay in my Macbook is behind the battery. I DNRTFA, but I don't see why having the body be a single piece of aluminum would prevent them from doing the same thing.

    2. Re:so much for easy HD/Memory swaps by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      You mean, you can actually get the HD out without tearing the machine apart into a million pieces now? Well, that's a pleasant surprise. When did this start happening? Because I still haven't seen this.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:so much for easy HD/Memory swaps by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      Only in the macbook can you easily service the ram and hard drive. In the macbook pro the only 'user' serviceable part is the ram. The reality of taking apart a macbook pro is out of the reach of most users.

    4. Re:so much for easy HD/Memory swaps by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It cracks me up how many people who read a "news for nerds" web site are confounded by a laptop that requires a screwdriver and some simple instructions to disassemble.

      Gosh, it's so HARD! There's SCREWS!

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    5. Re:so much for easy HD/Memory swaps by Applekid · · Score: 1

      It cracks me up how many people who read a "news for nerds" web site are confounded by a laptop that requires a screwdriver and some simple instructions to disassemble.

      Perhaps you missed this part:

      The reality of taking apart a macbook pro is out of the reach of most users.

      . . . taking apart a macbook pro is out of the reach of most users.

      . . . taking apart a macbook pro is out of the reach of most users.

      most users.

      We're a fringe. I like it that way.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    6. Re:so much for easy HD/Memory swaps by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Uh huh. And most users wouldn't replace their own hard drive, regardless of how mechanically simple it is.

      Upgrading computers is something >90% of computer users simply don't care about.

      I don't care if I'm the fringe or not...I just don't understand why people get so exercised about the fact that Apple computers sometimes require disassembly to service. Anybody who has the slightest desire to do so can. Anybody who doesn't, doesn't likely care.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:so much for easy HD/Memory swaps by iron-kurton · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I *can* upgrade the HD in my MBP, but I choose not to because it voids my warranty. Why is that so hard to understand??

      Even IF I didn't have my warranty, I would not want to do it because my time is better spent doing other things, like actually getting my work done.

      Besides, I can't understand why, when I bring my MBP to the "Genius" bar to upgrade my HD, they tell me not even THEY can do it, but only an Apple Certified repair shop. Wtf?

      What bothers me most is that it's an expensive machine, and their LESS expensive machine, the Macbook, actually HAS a user serviceable HD.

      --
      Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine -- Robert C. Gallagher
    8. Re:so much for easy HD/Memory swaps by Fortunato_NC · · Score: 1

      I call BS. Upgrading your hard drive does not void your warranty. I've upgraded my macbook pro's hard drive and subsequently had it serviced under applecare (fan started making noise, it was replaced under warranty) with no issues. It took me longer to back up and restore 80GB of data than it did to physically swap the drives.

      --
      Blogging Weight Loss, Distance Education, and more at verlin.com
    9. Re:so much for easy HD/Memory swaps by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Exactly, It's the only reason I cannot recommend it to any of my customers. An easy to service machine is much cheaper and takes much less time to uh...service, and I have run into a lot of crappy drives recently. A 20 dollar job shouldn't cost hundreds of dollars along with the increased of breaking something. That's something I simply can't afford. Best to keep my hands(and my reputation) clean and send them off the the Apple store.

      --
      What?
    10. Re:so much for easy HD/Memory swaps by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      For me it's not a nerd thing. It's a business issue. It's not worth the time and risk. Besides, those are very tiny screws, which I doubt even space ants can handle. And lets not forget all the tape and glue either. There's no reason to make a computer in such a fashion, until you remember that lack of serviceability is more of a fashion statement than anything else. I could even accept it if they put it under the keyboard instead of burying it in one of the most inaccessible spots they could find. Absolutely outrageous.

      --
      What?
    11. Re:so much for easy HD/Memory swaps by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      The idea behind making it simple to service is to make it cheap and less labor intensive to service. It reduces by orders of magnitude the risk of breakage.

      --
      What?
    12. Re:so much for easy HD/Memory swaps by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      I did indeed upgrade my hard drive in my mbp, it was a pain in the ass. Nowhere near as simple as my dell. I would not call it user serviceable, unlike replacing the ram, if you do not know exactly what you are doing you can really fuck up your mbp.

    13. Re:so much for easy HD/Memory swaps by iron-kurton · · Score: 1

      Well, then go to the Genius bar and tell them that.

      --
      Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine -- Robert C. Gallagher
  13. Re:How about adding A bigger screen and video card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The intel GMA is fine for a laptop and is well supported for those of us who dual boot linux. What specific applications do you need a better video card on a Macbook for?

  14. Re:How Did This Make It To The Front Page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not about being devoted exclusively to Linux/FOSS, it's about the simple fact that this entire "article" is that there's a rumour that new Macbooks might have a glass touchpad and an aluminium casing. Even if that was a stone-cold fact it wouldn't be newsworthy, so as a rumour it's complete bullshit. The GP is right.

  15. yeah aluminum... by mzs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    so the wifi range can be shorter O_o

    1. Re:yeah aluminum... by oahazmatt · · Score: 1

      It can't be any worse than the Faraday iBook.

      --
      Those who believe the Internet is private,
      find their privates are on the Internet.
    2. Re:yeah aluminum... by dotBran · · Score: 1

      so the wifi range can be shorter O_o

      In my experience, the range with 802.11g on my aluminum iMac is better than the 802.11g range with my PS3.

  16. Uh, glass isn't needed for multi-touch by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

    It seems like they're assuming an iPod touch screen surface would be required to have a multi-touch trackpad.

    This is not the case.

    --
    September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
    1. Re:Uh, glass isn't needed for multi-touch by Dekortage · · Score: 1

      It seems like they're assuming an iPod touch screen surface would be required to have a multi-touch trackpad.

      Hmm. My current MBP does multi-touch already. Heck, Apple's MBP marketing already states this.

      --
      $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    2. Re:Uh, glass isn't needed for multi-touch by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

      Hence the part where I wrote "This is not the case", which was alluding to the current multi-touch track pads.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  17. Re:How about adding A bigger screen and video card by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    At $1500 it should be better or at least put a bigger screen in.

  18. Re:How about adding A bigger screen and video card by jonnythan · · Score: 3, Informative

    13" lightweight laptops are more expensive than the big bulky 15.4" laptops of the same specs.

    This is true across the board.

    The Macbook actually compares very well with current offerings from Dell. Compare it to the Vostro 1310 and XPS 1330. The Macbook specs are getting slightly dated in comparison to Dell's frequent updates, but when the new Macbook comes out expect the specs to be as good or better for the price than similarly-equipped laptops from other manufacturers.

  19. Re:How about adding A bigger screen and video card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would you want what you payed for?

    What does this have to do with letting a ship fall off to leeward?

    "Payed" is a word that does not belong in a spelling checker as, like "wether", it is a word you generally don't intend to use. Most people would use "paid".

  20. Re:How about adding A bigger screen and video card by falcon5768 · · Score: 1

    except the Macbook is 1099 not 1500 base and the extra you pay to bump it up to the 1500 level are in processor, disk drive, memory and hard drive

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  21. HDMI out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just want them to have an HDMI out

    1. Re:HDMI out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have DVI out. Go pick up a DVI->HDMI cable on newegg for >$10 and quityerbitchin.

    2. Re:HDMI out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, there's no way to get audio through the HDMI connection that way. Some people care about that.

  22. Multi-touch pad by bsDaemon · · Score: 5, Informative

    the MacBook Pro already has a multi-touch trackpad, so I'm not sure where the rumor part comes in...

    1. Re:Multi-touch pad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The MacBook !Pro doesn't.

    2. Re:Multi-touch pad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They meant adding multi-touch trackpad to macbooks as well. Still pro's trackpad isn't glass.

  23. Screw trackpads by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If Apple wanted to be cool, they'd dump the trackpad entirely and add a trackpoint.

    Yes, that's right. They should switch to the nub. The pencil eraser. The clit mouse. The keyboard clit.

    C'mon, it'd be awesome.

    --
    I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    1. Re:Screw trackpads by g0at · · Score: 1

      What? Why?

    2. Re:Screw trackpads by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1

      Because trackpads are annoying and make laptops a chore to use.

      I love trackpoints. My old Toshiba Tecra M3 (RIP 2005-2007) had both a trackpoint and a trackpad. I used the Synaptic/ALPS drivers to configure the trackpad as a circular scroll wheel (a la iPod) and mapped middle-click to one of the corners. Scrolling and middle-click were the only things I used the trackpad for. For everything else, I used the trackpoint (bet you thought I was going to say MasterCard).

      The trackpoint is the perfect pointing device. I could keep my hand almost entirely still while using it. I splayed out my hand, laying my index finger on the trackpoint and my thumb over the buttons. In order to move the cursor, all I had to do was twitch my index finger ever so slightly. No wrist movement at all. I loved it.

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    3. Re:Screw trackpads by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      Only if they license the Thinkpad one from Lenovo. The Toshiba version is utter crap. Does anyone else still even use those? The super great erase is one of the many things I love about the Thinkpad line, along with the fact that it runs Linux better than my MBP does. This MBP is a year and a half old, you'd think wireless networking would work out of the box with current versions of *buntu, but nooooooooooo! I still have to compile madwifi from source to get wireless on it.

    4. Re:Screw trackpads by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

      Yes, it would. I'm infinitely more comfortable using one of those then any trackpad. Put it in the same area as touchpads are and my very capable left thumb (thank you sega, sony and microsoft) would have no trouble navigating my screen. Hell, throw in a second one on the right for scrolling vert and horiz.

      Or they could save everyone some time and just include a mini already-paired bluetooth mouse in the box.

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
    5. Re:Screw trackpads by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I hate trackpoints and love trackpads. Judging by the market, the majority of notebook buyers agree with me.

    6. Re:Screw trackpads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      omg, they could call it the iClit.

      All it would take for the world to finally realize the massive superiority of the TrackPoint compared to other pointing devices, especially the dreaded touchpad, is for Steve Jobs to abandon his computer molestation fetish, and "invent" the keyboard nipple (he could color it silver and make it glow, innovation!). Suddenly, all the people who swore they'd rather type on a 2" wide piece of glass than a desktop keyboard would be extolling the virtues of The Nipple and thanking Steve Jobs for bestowing on them this divinely inspired innovation, before anyone realized that IBM and Lenovo still exist.

      I don't really want the world to have another reason to lick Steve Jobs balls...but THAT'S WHAT YOU GET FOR NOT MAKING A DESKTOP KEYBOARD WITH A DECENT TRACKPOINT THAT CAN ACTUALLY BE BOUGHT SOMEWHERE BESIDES EBAY...LENOVO!!1

    7. Re:Screw trackpads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who modded this "insightful"? Once reason I have a MBP is the presence of the trackpad and the lack of the stupid nub that gets in my way while typing.

    8. Re:Screw trackpads by amliebsch · · Score: 1
      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    9. Re:Screw trackpads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to feel the same way you do. I couldn't stand trackpads and had always used ThinkPads so I got used to the trackpoint. As a touch typist, I loved that I didn't have to move my hands or that my wrists would accidentally brush up against the trackpad.

      All that ended when I got my MBP. I'm not sure what they did differently (aside from 2-finger scrolling, which I now can't live without and the fact that it realizes that I'm typing and the mouse shouldn't move), but it feels different from every other trackpad I've used. I find it easier to navigate to wherever I'm trying to click.

      I still can't stand trackpads on PC laptops and if it weren't for the fact that I primarily use a trackpad, I imagine I'd still prefer the trackpoint. But somehow Apple got it right.

    10. Re:Screw trackpads by sznupi · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised I'd have to convince anyone here that "judging by the market" is a horrible, horrible metric.

      But other than that...you're wrong.

      From what I see around majority of people simply hate touchpads/use mouse if they can (going sometimes to absurd levels: trying to use a mouse on a smooth surface next to touchpad with laptop on their lap/outside; yes, I witnessed it)

      They DON'T KNOW there is a third option. Most of them, given a chance to try it (and beeing aware that you have to give it some time to adjust) at least like it a lot more than touchpad.

      Accidentally, from what I see around, people NOT having a mouse attached at all times when their laptop is on a desk/etc. are very often Thinkpad users.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    11. Re:Screw trackpads by wish+bot · · Score: 1

      ...from what I see around, people NOT having a mouse attached at all times when their laptop is on a desk/etc. are very often Thinkpad users.

      Or...MacBook/Pro/Powerbook users! The touchpad action on a mac is way different to windows laptops. Don't know why, but it is. It's also much much better. Some extensions give you the option to change the trackpad action to 'windows style'.

      Having had a clitpad, I actually like the trackpad on the Powerbook better.

      --
      lemonade was a popular drink and it still is
    12. Re:Screw trackpads by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Not really, I'm afraid - Macs are almost nonexistant in my country ;P (and when my buddy uses his Macbook on the desk, he has mouse attached)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    13. Re:Screw trackpads by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1

      From what I see around majority of people simply hate touchpads/use mouse if they can (going sometimes to absurd levels: trying to use a mouse on a smooth surface next to touchpad with laptop on their lap/outside; yes, I witnessed it)

      I know. I even see some people use those horrible little travel mice because they hate their touchpads so much. Sheez--as much as I hate touchpads, I think those travel mice are worse. My hands are too big for them...

      I have a soft spot for those mini-trackballs with trigger grips, though. I use a Logitech trackball with my desktop at home, so I bought one of those trigger trackballs to use with laptops.

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    14. Re:Screw trackpads by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1

      I don't know if things have changed in newer models, but I really, really hate using the touchpad on my roommate's 17" PowerBook G4. When I'm using that machine, I use the keyboard as much as possible.

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
  24. Re:How about adding A bigger screen and video card by BalmyBrute · · Score: 1

    Good god! I apologize! The slight misspelling of that word must have made the entire pose unreadable!

  25. Re:How about adding A bigger screen and video card by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why do you assume bigger is better? I'd rather have a 13" laptop than a 15" laptop.

    My perfect laptop form factor would be a 12" non-widescreen with nVidia discrete graphics. Oh, and it would be even more awesome if it were a tablet and doubly awesome if I could rotate it into portrait mode.

    Too bad the ThinkPad X61 only has GMA...

    --
    I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
  26. Made for the villains... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    They called him Mr. Glass.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Made for the villains... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      To counter act a man who had super strength and fortitude but a slightly below average intelligence (but still in the range of normal), but humble is a man who is super frail and sickly with a slightly above average intelligence, with a Huge Ego.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  27. Re:How about adding A bigger screen and video card by kyle74 · · Score: 1

    wish Apple would make a 14.1 inch macbook. 13' is just a little too small for me.

  28. Re:How about adding A bigger screen and video card by GuyverDH · · Score: 1

    Not sure about the entire pose, but definitely left a bitter aftertaste after reading the *post*...

    Sorry friend, you set it up, I knocked it down.

    --
    Who is general failure, and why is he reading my hard drive?
  29. Will Apple be Offering... by tsnorquist · · Score: 1

    a Stained Glass trackpad to our religious users?

    1. Re:Will Apple be Offering... by kanweg · · Score: 1

      If they sin enough, it will get stained in time.

      Bert

  30. I realize thin is in... by spagthorpe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But I really would like to see something that I could use a day or two on a charge. If they can make it paper thin and still run a few hours, then surely, they could make something twice as thick that would go for a day?

    --

    WWJD -- What Would Jimi Do?
    (Smash amp, burn guitar, take home the groupies)

    1. Re:I realize thin is in... by voisine · · Score: 1

      I use my macbook pro heavily, so for me a 3 hour battery life vs 5 makes no difference. I have to plug it in either way, so I'd rather it be thin, sleek and easy to carry over to the nearest outlet. Now if it could go for, say, 10 hours, that would be worth sacrificing a bit of portability and style, so probably tripling the size (and cost) of the existing battery.

  31. Just wrong! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Apple has NEVER used desktop processors in ANY of their Intel lines. Even Mini and iMac use notebook processors, and the Mac Pros use Server-grade Xeon processors. That give them an edge up in buying quantity over Dell because they only buy higher margin parts that Intel likes to sell, not "cheap" ones.

    They are considered more "eco-friendly" because they are removing parts and changing to reusable materials. I have an old Snow iBook and the thing is a complex mess of two layers of plastic with "tin foil" to try to meet EMI requirements. The new macbook has barely any parts inside.. only one PCB even. By changing to a metal frame it makes the machine mostly glass and metal... all things nearly 100% recyclable versus plastic that's "sort of" recyclable and required high priced oil to make. I'm sure it's also CHEAPER for them to do (or more marketable) or they wouldn't be doing it either. Apple is looking for ways to separate themselves from the pack, and to cut down on repairs of all those white plastic pieces.

    1. Re:Just wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      just because they don't use so much plastic doesn't lower the amount of oil used to make it. Lets stop dropping myths. It takes oil to make everything. ;)
      from the machines that mine the metal to the machines that make the all aluminum case, oil is in there somewhere. Just because it contains less plastic doesn't make it an oil free product. Of course they are cutting down on repairs....something goes wrong, you buy a complete new one. This has been Apple's product policy from the start. My uncle's garage is a HUGE museum of old Apple products. This "we don't want you reparing anything" policy is just as wasteful. Thanks but if I can fix something with a part and save a bundle, that's more eco friendly than hundreds of old apple cases littering the landscape.

    2. Re:Just wrong! by fermion · · Score: 3, Informative
      I agree with you. Here is a bit of history and personal knowledge to prove your point.

      First, consistent customers with a high spec get the best parts. When I was working shipping blanks, one or two big name companies got the reliable items. Everyone else go their rejects. This is a fact. If Apple is willing to commit to purchasing a year in advance, they get the good stuff. Everyone else, like Dell, who is looking for the cheapest price, gets Apple rejects.

      Second, Apple has always been conscious about the environment, especially in relation to user safety. For instance, Apple was one of the first retailers to move CRT monitors to the swedish standards for radiation. They also moved to LCD for similar reasons. In the switch, Apple also cut the power needed to run a computer considerably. In fact Apple tends to have very energy efficient computers, with current models running on half the power of similar models from other vendors.

      All this of course costs money. For years CRTs are cheaper than LCDs. Building power efficient kit costs money. It is easier to throw together a power consuming piece of junk than a well designed performer. A lighter, smaller machine has obvious savings in transportation. What is missing from most discussions is the fact that energy consumption during the lifetime of the product is going to far outweigh, in most cases, the energy needed to build the product. Furthermore, refurbishment of the entire product, where the company has control of disposal, it likely the best way to go, although it is also expensive as it does not externalize costs.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    3. Re:Just wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...with current models running on half the power of similar models from other vendors.

      Well, in fact they are now greener than ever as run with no power at all, but on intel chips :)

  32. Re:How about adding A bigger screen and video card by Atti+K. · · Score: 1

    Why do you assume bigger is better? I'd rather have a 13" laptop than a 15" laptop.

    My perfect laptop form factor would be a 12" non-widescreen with nVidia discrete graphics.

    I definitely agree. However, TFA says that:

    16:9 screens which come in slightly bigger sizes: 14 inch and 15.6 inch with different resolutions, obviously.

    Pretty disappointing... Come on Apple, everybody wants subnotebooks nowadays, and you increase the screen size??? If these rumors are true, the only 13 inch Macbook will be the Air?
    I still hope Apple will make a 12 (or, who knows, maybe 10 :) inch notebook in the near future...

    --
    .sig: No such file or directory
  33. Re:How about adding A bigger screen and video card by drsmithy · · Score: 1

    My perfect laptop form factor would be a 12" non-widescreen with nVidia discrete graphics. Oh, and it would be even more awesome if it were a tablet and doubly awesome if I could rotate it into portrait mode.

    Not quite sure why the discrete graphics is so important. It's not like you'll be playing any high-end games on a machine like that (which will inevitably have a form-factor requiring a relatively slow ULV CPU).

  34. WiFi regression? by Prison+Rodeo · · Score: 1

    Not sure the all-aluminum thing is an improvement; there are plenty of forum postings out there noting that MBPs have worse WiFi reception than standard MBs, and blaming it on the aluminum. (I've found the same thing to be true on my machines as well.)

  35. Re:How about adding A bigger screen and video card by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1

    I don't care about high-end games, I care about memory usage.

    Integrated graphics don't have their own memory. They work by eating system memory. I run without swap, so I need as much memory as I can get.

    By the way, the Thinkpad X61 (a 12" non-widescreen notebook) does not require a ULV processor. It can come with anything up to a T8300.

    --
    I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
  36. How about just using the iPhone docked there by cpu_fusion · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Dock the iPhone where the trackpad would be, to lower manufacturing costs. Could use the iPhone's screen so that the trackpad would be more than just input, it would be a second display.

    Maybe.

    1. Re:How about just using the iPhone docked there by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      Not only that it'd allow one to share a laptop in a group setting (undock my iPhone, hand it to my daughter, she docks her iTouch) and would afford an easy way to enable wireless networking at need (iPhone vs. iTouch).

      William

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  37. Re: dangerous chemicals by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1

    That's a stupid point you're trying to make, the dangerous chemical use is proportionnal to the area, so having a tiny screen 1/10th the area of the main screen is going to add, what, 10% of that bad chemical at worst. Boohooooo.

  38. Tired right wing BS by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Go back to redstate or freep.

    1. Re:Tired right wing BS by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      It does piss of some people when the subject of just how much power Al Gore uses is brought up. I mean is it really that bad that his home uses more power in 3 weeks than the typical American family uses in a year?

    2. Re:Tired right wing BS by ncc74656 · · Score: 0

      Hey everybody...look at the ignorant Europeon (misspelling intentional) who doesn't know what the frak he's talking about. Read about your idol and weep. It ain't BS if it's the truth. You might even call it an inconvenient truth (the authors of the linked article did).

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    3. Re:Tired right wing BS by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      How predictable...some Grünsturmabteilung pussy doesn't have a snappy comeback for my previous post, so he mods it down as Overrated. Whoever you are, you're a gutless coward. Fortunately, I have karma to burn, so I hereby invite you to suck the barbed cock of Satan.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  39. Macbook ergonomics suck by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1
    I've been a Mac user since the 80s (I'll never pollute my house with a PC) and I never thought I'd say this, but I hate my Mac!

    I have a MacBook and aside from the ordeal I had to go through getting basic developer tools working, the edges are so sharp that I'm gonna have to take some sandpaper out or file them down before the pain in my wrists become too much for me.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:Macbook ergonomics suck by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Sticking in the CD and clicking install is an ordeal now?

    2. Re:Macbook ergonomics suck by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      If it was as simple as doing a single install off a CD I wouldn't have called it an ordeal. But since you're an intelligent man you knew that anyway, didn't you?

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    3. Re:Macbook ergonomics suck by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So what happened? I've installed an awful lot of OS X developer tools and it's always been a double click on the CD. Actually, if you're doing it on a large number of machines (a research lab of 40 or so, say) then it's faster to put the downloadable disk image on the server and double click on that.

      So what did you do?

    4. Re:Macbook ergonomics suck by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 1

      I hate the edges on my MacBook. It's rugged and sleek, but a pain in the ass to type on for a long time. I like being able to pick it up with one hand without the cheap feeling, bending of plastic that I get with other laptops. Heat is sometimes a problem, but my Latitude can't stay in my lap for much longer. Overall, I've been happy with it.

      Can't relate to your developer tools experience though, couldn't be much simpler to install XCode, and not sure what 'basic' could possibly mean otherwise.

    5. Re:Macbook ergonomics suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the man's post! It's pretty obvious that he was complaining that being forced to sand the edges of the CD so they weren't so sharp took an awful long time!

  40. Glass = not ideal material for laptops by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Surely glass is a really bad idea for laptops? It's heavier than plastic, and less durable in terms of scratch resistance and shattering. Worse still it has more friction than some plastics, so not ideal for moving your finger over.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    1. Re:Glass = not ideal material for laptops by DancesWithBlowTorch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Surely glass is a really bad idea for laptops? It's heavier than plastic, and less durable in terms of scratch resistance and shattering. Worse still it has more friction than some plastics, so not ideal for moving your finger over.

      Actually, glass is more scratch resistant than most plastics (try dropping your plastic sunglasses on the beach, once. Then try again with a pair of proper glasses, made from glass).

      Glass can also be made less sticky by roughening up the surface. Now, I agree that it's indeed heavier than most plastics. The only reason to have a glass trackpad instead of a plastic one would be if one wanted to protect what's underneath...

      We have seen Apple using Glass as a cover for the iMac displays, and for the iPhones. So I would conjecture that they would go for a display under the trackpad. That, however, strikes me as odd from an ergonomics point of view: You'd have to move your head back and forth between the display and the pad, which sounds stupid.

      Well, it is a rumour.

    2. Re:Glass = not ideal material for laptops by onefriedrice · · Score: 1

      Some of your points are quite valid and in the end it will be interesting to see if/how Apple executes this idea, but plastic being more durable in terms of scratch resistance? I don't know what plastic you're using, but I've never seen one that scratched less than glass.

      --
      This author takes full ownership and responsibility for the unpopular opinions outlined above.
    3. Re:Glass = not ideal material for laptops by dotBran · · Score: 1

      I would conjecture that they would go for a display under the trackpad. That, however, strikes me as odd from an ergonomics point of view: You'd have to move your head back and forth between the display and the pad, which sounds stupid.

      There may be a small TFT LCD behind the glass of the trackpad, but it isn't likely. The reason the trackpad would be glass (and probably black below) would be because the MacBook lines will be all aluminum with black keyboards and glass-on-black details, including the power button and Apple logo. I'm pretty sure they've got Jonathan Ive ironing out the details.

    4. Re:Glass = not ideal material for laptops by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Ergonomically it seems like a very bad idea. To see a screen under the trackpad, not only do you have to look down and re-focus, but you have to move your hand out of the way too.

      You get this with the iPhone too. In order to use it you keep having to move your fingers out of the way just to see the scratched up smudge ridden screen. Maybe Apple didn't realise that people sweat, especially in summer...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  41. Re:How about adding A bigger screen and video card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just to piss you off even more, it's shininess, not shinyness. :P

  42. Re:How Did This Make It To The Front Page? by jeremyp · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised that, as a member of the tiny Apple fan base, you write in that tone.

    If you are not a member of the Apple fan base, I suggest the fact that you could be bothered to read at least the summary and post this, proves your assertion incorrect.

    --
    All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  43. Nintendo Mac? by newgalactic · · Score: 1

    Sounds like the DS. Dual Screens? I know it doesn't say anything about having the glass track-pad as a screen, but what other use is there for making it glass?

  44. yes! by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's the only way for Mac users to keep up with the confusion that Windows users experience when dealing with all those extra mouse buttons.

  45. Re:How Did This Make It To The Front Page? by sexconker · · Score: 1

    I agree, it's not newsworthy.

    But there are plenty of other IT stories to fill the day.

  46. eco friendly by shatterpoint · · Score: 0, Troll

    eco-friendly, what exactly does this mean? I know, lets buy the new apple its 'eco-friendly' then we'll pop over to wal-mart and buy tons and tons of garbage and put it into those little white plastic bags that litter the landscape. buying an apple to be 'eco-friendly' is ignorant. The places these things are made aren't eco-friendly and have not desire to be. They want the white guilt money. Oil is used in every step of the manufacturing process, but here we've got ourselves thinking since parts of it don't contain oil its oil free. These are the same yuppy retards that think the "hybrid" vehicles or hydrogen vehicles will "save the planet". It'll take a lot of energy to MAKE the energy to run these things. The planet will be here LONG after you and I are gone.....and after humans have gone. You want to alleviate that white guilt? go pick up the wal-mart bags...you'll be doing a bigger service than merely buying a "eco-friendly" PC

  47. I just got reminded of this... by ibanezist00 · · Score: 1
    --
    There are mountains to cross for those that are willing.
  48. Re:How about adding A bigger screen and video card by kimvette · · Score: 2, Insightful

    re: Why do you assume bigger is better?

    More screen estate, higher resolution. I actually want two laptops: one Eepc and one 17" laptop. One is obviously ultra-portable and fine for checking email, running diagnostics with wireshark, etc. while on the other you can do real work or play actual games. Sometimes just having a portable desktop/workstation replacement is nice.

    Of course considering I prefer to run Linux, gaming would be limited to LBreakout and Supertux. ;)

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  49. joke by Falconhell · · Score: 4, Funny

    Round corners reminds me of the old joke;

    Q;Why do they make macs so big?

    A: So mac users cant put them up their asses.

    Q: Why do macs have round corners?

    A: Just in case they manage the above!

    (-:

    1. Re:joke by dotBran · · Score: 0

      Q;Why do they make macs so big?

      A: So mac users cant put them up their asses.

      Q: Why do macs have round corners?

      A: Just in case they manage the above!

      EPIC FAIL. Not cool.

    2. Re:joke by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 1

      That's funny in theory and all, but Macs are small and have sharp corners....

      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    3. Re:joke by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Yep, thats why I said *old* joke.... applies to the older g3/g4 macs

    4. Re:joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well thanks to the TSA, that old joke can now be sold as a feature that allows the user a less-painful means of getting their laptop through airport security.

  50. One piece of aluminum? by supernova_hq · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Doesn't there need to be at least 2 pieces? If you can put a hinge in the middle of a solid piece of aluminum without cutting it in 2, I'm sure there's a Nobel Price for Engineering you could pick up.

  51. I hate my Macbook, but what's the alternative? by Fzz · · Score: 1
    I've also had quite a few Macs, and hate my Macbook. I agree about the sharp edges. The keyboard sucks - if you hit the keys slightly off center, they don't register. And I hate the shiny screen, which has the worst viewing angle of any LCD I've used.

    In just about all respects except CPU power, my old 12" G4 Powerbook was so much better. But if the new Macbook comes with a 14" screen, I won't buy one - it will be too big for airplane use. And the Macbook Air doesn't have a replaceable battery, so it's no good for long flights either (yes, I do a lot of work on long-haul flights). Looks like I'm stuck with my crappy Macbook - I'm compelled to run MS Office and need a Unix development environment so I'm going to stick with MacOS X. Money isn't an issue - it's a company machine. But Apple seem determined not to make the full-featured but fairly compact machine I really need.

  52. Re:How about adding A bigger screen and video card by dotBran · · Score: 1

    Well, you're obviously part of the minority; the Air has been Apple's best-selling product since it came out, and the standard MacBook has been switching between second and third since the holidays.

  53. Re:How Did This Make It To The Front Page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "tiny" Apple fan base has driven more usability into general computers in the last two years than Linux has in the last eight. I don't like that guy's tone but what I'm reading into it is "quit bashing until you guys have something better to show".

  54. semicolons by cheezfreek · · Score: 1
    Not to be a language nazi -- well, yes, to be a language nazi -- but this is not how you should be using semicolons, my friend.

    </annoyingbastard>

    1. Re:semicolons by Cheesebisquit · · Score: 0

      Could you spell out the problem with the semicolon usage, fellow Cheeseman? I want to learn.

    2. Re:semicolons by Jerry+Rivers · · Score: 1

      It is used entirely appropriately.

      Check Strunk and White's "The Elements of Style".

      http://www.amazon.com/Elements-Style-Fourth-William-Strunk/dp/020530902X

      --
      The pursuit of absolute tolerance leads to the most rigorous and ludicrous intolerance. - REX MURPHY
  55. brilliantly stupid release date by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    Manufacturing process is completely different; the release date will be in the last weeks of September

    If so, then great! About 4-8 weeks too late for the back-to-school crowd.

    Brilliant!

    1. Re:brilliantly stupid release date by Justin+Ames · · Score: 1

      Actually, that makes perfect sense. The back to school crowd buys with their educational discount and gets their free iPod, clearing out old stock of both of these items. Then the new ones come out during the year when all the early-adopters buy them. Then by the time back-to-school season comes around, the parts are cheaper again and all the kinks have been worked out, so the students experience a much more stable experience that gets them hooked for life...

    2. Re:brilliantly stupid release date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it is brilliant. They'll be able to get rid of all their old stock. They do the same thing at Christmas.

  56. but how would I clean it? by sucati · · Score: 1

    I can't wait for iWindex to appear on the apple store

  57. Re:Tough one...Not Really by JohnNevets · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So if I'm understanding this right if a $0.05 part goes out and it would not be covered under warranty the customer would be charged the fee for the whole system of parts (probably several hundred dollars) while Apple gets to refurbish and resell the system of parts after they replace the cheap part (plus in house labor rates). Yea I can see how this would be win/win for apple. The only way to make this fair would be to reimburse the original purchaser for the parts that would be reused during the refurb, sort of like a core charge when you bring back your old starter motor. I would also guess that someone somewhere also is making the call that if the time and material to refurbish a system if going to be more then what they can resell the refurbish for, it will still be tossed in a landfill.

  58. Guilt! by helix1868 · · Score: 1

    Now I can get rid of my therapist and solve my Eco-Guilt with another Macbook I don't need! Thanks Steve Jobs!

  59. Synaptics cPad by macemoneta · · Score: 1

    Back in 2001, I bought a Toshiba 5105-s607 laptop (I'm still using it). It has a glass touchpad, with a second display (and a controllable EL backlight!). It's even completely supported by Linux, as well as Windows. I use it to display messages while my display is idle and powered off (e.g., new email, small animations, etc.).

    So, what's the Apple innovation again?

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

    1. Re:Synaptics cPad by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 1

      Well, since you're going to be a dick about it, I'd take a wild guess that all of this is fairly innovative.

      multi-touch and uses gestures. The screen isn't multi-touch; the body is manufactured out of one piece of aluminum. Eco-friendly, yet sturdy

      Feel free to snipe back with some more straw men, I'm sure someone somewhere said each and every feature in this list, by itself, was the best thing evar, and Apple invented it.

      ZOMGWTF, my soda can is made of aluminum, Apple just ripped off Coca Cola!

  60. Pen based input? by mevets · · Score: 1

    Would it be more usable than the conventional tablet [ ie. scribbling on the screen ], to have a smaller screen to write on? It would seem to keep the 'input clutter' away from the primary screen, provide feedback and higher resolution sensing.

    Also, you could use the iSight + little screen to get innovative viewing angles....

  61. Uh... by Yeroc · · Score: 1

    When did Slashdot's tag line become "Rumours for Nerds. Stuff that might matter."??

  62. Re:How Did This Make It To The Front Page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be new here. Back in the early days, when a 3-digit UID was the sign of a newbie, the articles actually got edited, there were no stupid memes, and you could have an intelligent discussion without the hordes of trolls and fanbois, almost all the articles were about FOSS.

    Now, if you'll excuse me, I have some kids to chase off my lawn.

  63. one piece of aluminum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wtf? as in there's no moving parts? sounds very dumb to me...

    how the fuck do you define 'one piece of aluminum'?

  64. Re:How about adding A bigger screen and video card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my opinion, the XPS1330 is significantly less noisy. The macbook tends to whine annoyingly immediately when even mildly CPU-intensive tasks are run. The MacBook Pro is a lot better, but so are the Dell Latitude notebooks.

  65. Most Aluminum Doesn't Go To Landfills by StCredZero · · Score: 1

    Uh, aluminum generally doesn't go to landfills. It's too valuable. Generally, if there's aluminum bound for a landfill, someone else figures out it's worth their while to make an extra buck by recycling it.

    I've owned an aluminum Powerbook for 5 years. It's still quite useful. And yes, it's definitely been dropped -- from waist-height onto asphalt! Result: some small dents and that's it! If, as you suggest, the ideal case is a replaceable, recyclable, soft thin metal, then aluminum is probably the ideal case material. (Pure aluminum is soft! It has to be alloyed to make it hard.)

  66. Re:How about adding A bigger screen and video card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really don't get these Apples to Oranges comparisons when talking about the "over priced" nature of the macbook (pros).

    The Asus you linked is far from a similar model.

    The Macbook Pro has:
    A 400-500Mhz faster processor.

    3MB of L2 cache, to the Asus's 2MB.

    A 800Mhz FSB, while the Asus is only 667Mhz.

    An Express Card slot, the Asus has PCMCIA.

    The Asus is 0.3In thicker, and 0.8lbs heavier.

    The Asus's screen is slightly larger (.2in), but the resolution is lower: 1366 x 768 to the Macbook Pro's 1440 by 900.

    Asus HD is 7200rpm, while the Macbook is 5400rpm.

    The Macbook Pro also has optical audio in/out, FW800, a multitouch trackpad and Bluetooh. There's also Target Disk Mode.

    (Does the Asus have Bluetooth? There's no mention there...)

    In any case, stop comparing a laptop with generally worse specs to the Macbook Pro and then claiming the Macbook Pro is "sooo over priced". It's not. Upgrading to the 512Mb video card means you get the larger HD (250GB) and a faster processor (2.5Ghz). Yes it's still 2GB of ram, but you can 4GB from fry's for $80, what does it matter?

    Want to talk about Apple Mac Pro desktops? Those are SUPER over priced. The portables aren't though.

  67. Al Gore by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    I think this puts your theories to rest.

    How about this: "Gore isn't quite as green as he's led the world to believe"? Between Present Bush and Al Gore guess who's home is more energy efficient... Bush's home. While Gore's home is a gluttony for energy Bush's home is pretty efficient. Bush's home was built to use geothermal energy for heating, though this link says Gore installed such a system in his home. Some get on Bush because he's an oilman however Gore's family has also invested in oil, specifically they invested in Oxy, Occidental Petroleum, and Oxy has threatened a number of native Indian tribes ancestral lands.

    Falcon

    1. Re:Al Gore by otopico · · Score: 1

      Yeah and Gore lied us into a war....

      OOOOOPS!

      Yeah, I give a sh*t if Gore says one thing but has evil light bulbs. But even if he ISNT personally trying to be energy efficient, he has brought the concept into a much wider and more mainstream position.

      Please use a new 'Gore is bad because' link, December of 2006 is officially old and perhaps, just perhaps not accurate now.

      Next thing you'll bring up how Iraq has weapons of mass destruction and won't let the inspectors do their job!

    2. Re:Al Gore by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      even if he ISNT personally trying to be energy efficient, he has brought the concept into a much wider and more mainstream position.

      I agree but if he really does care then he needs to walk his talk as well.

      Please use a new 'Gore is bad because' link

      Hey, I voted against Bush in 2000 by selecting Gore. And there's very little Bush has done I agree with but he doesn't talk about how bad the environment is then built an energy hog for a home.

      Next thing you'll bring up how Iraq has weapons of mass destruction and won't let the inspectors do their job!

      I'm still waiting to see those WMDs. Those same ones Saddam used against Iran as well as people inside Iraq while Reagan and Bush Sr supported Saddam.

      Falcon

  68. A lighter, smaller machine has obvious savings in by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    transportation.

    Actually I think most of Apple's product line actually will require more transportation. While stuff like the Mac Mini and iMac are lighter they are not really expandable. Only the Mac Pros are. I can replace the motherboard, hard disks, graphics cards and other components in a Dell or HP thus extending it's life. But I can't do that to a Mini. My last 2 PCs I added internal hard disks, installed new mobos, and a graphics card. I can slowly upgrade a PC making it last longer but I can't do that to most Macs. However laptops, both PC and MacBook/ MacBook Pros, suffer this as well. And I say that typing this on a MacBook Pro.

    Falcon

  69. recycling by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Hell, Al cans vanish out of my recycling bin before the truck even gets there. It's magic!

    Yea, I used to get paid to recycle, now I have to pay to recycle.

    Falcon

  70. plastic is from the oil by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Actually plastic was originally made from plants, plants farmers could grow not manufacturing plants. Chemurgy was about making industrial products with agricultural material. DuPont was awarded a patent in the 1930s on a process for making plastic from petroleum so Chemurgy fell by the wayside. However now it's making a comeback, with Bioplastics.

    Falcon