If there is one copy at the start, and two copies at the end, then a copy has been made. If one does not have the right to make the copy, said right being reserved by law to the owner of the copy right, one has broke copy right law.
This is an obvious tool for infringing on the copyrights of other. If it were not, then there would be no reason to say
"Nobody shares any copyrighted files, and therefore nobody needs to hide away."
They can't even hide behind "it has other uses", because of all the talk about copyrights.
That is not what you said, cancer is often genetically different from it's host, and chances are the oldest cancer tissue is older than you are and outlived it's host.
See, the local/state government can say "All your warehouse and their contents belong to us now because you didn't pay your taxes." It is called seizing the assets of a tax cheat.
The fact that Amazon is trying to cheat the tax system kind of make your "biting the hand" statement irrelevant.
Never a good idea. After all the government makes the rules and interprets the rules. Imagine if the government decides to seize the warehouses and their contents. Amazon will have a serious problem at that point.
I swear by Apollo, Asclepius, Hygieia, and Panacea, and I take to witness all the gods, all the goddesses, to keep according to my ability and my judgment, the following Oath.
To consider dear to me, as my parents, him who taught me this art; to live in common with him and, if necessary, to share my goods with him; To look upon his children as my own brothers, to teach them this art.
Slashdot Mirror
And, exactly how is using this service going to facilitate such fair-use action?
The answer is "it is not". Judging from the projects own wording, this is designed to violate the rights of the copyright holder.
If there is one copy at the start, and two copies at the end, then a copy has been made. If one does not have the right to make the copy, said right being reserved by law to the owner of the copy right, one has broke copy right law.
This is an obvious tool for infringing on the copyrights of other. If it were not, then there would be no reason to say
They can't even hide behind "it has other uses", because of all the talk about copyrights.
That is not what you said, cancer is often genetically different from it's host, and chances are the oldest cancer tissue is older than you are and outlived it's host.
It's a fact, look it up.
The DNA of a cancer cell says it is human. Therefore, according to your own words, no one should be allowed to kill or experiment on cancer cells.
See, the local/state government can say "All your warehouse and their contents belong to us now because you didn't pay your taxes." It is called seizing the assets of a tax cheat.
The fact that Amazon is trying to cheat the tax system kind of make your "biting the hand" statement irrelevant.
Never a good idea. After all the government makes the rules and interprets the rules. Imagine if the government decides to seize the warehouses and their contents. Amazon will have a serious problem at that point.
First, bears must discover fire.
Yeah, pretty much. I see many products where the early versions are great, but later versions start failing sooner and sooner.
Yeah, I will relax when I don't get messages with down mods on old articles, and I do months old, not days old.
Yeah, because you are my only little mod-stalker aren't you.
You must have one sad, pathetic life down there in your mom's basement.
That is why you need to drink your milk, children.
This isn't begging as much as it is demanding.
"I want open source drivers! Gimme gimme gimme!."
How about I call you stupid instead? He did not sign because he does not agree with it.
If his name and words are so important in the community, why doesn't the community listen to him more?
Torvalds called banning binary modules "stupid," and told kernel hackers they should base decisions on technical merit, not political agendas
You forgot something:
The mother is the patient, so the patient is not harmed. Only some parasitic tissue is removed.
Hmm, which is more harmful:
That is because you, like most christians, simply deny anything that does not support your false god.
You live with your head buried in the sand so you can not hear that which disproves your bible.
Now, take your pseudo-science elsewhere.
So, if I give you nothing but negative information when there is positive information, is that not misleading?
Really? Hmmm. So, trying to get only negative stories about a candidate in the top search results is not disinformation, eh? What would you call it?
And, what would you call it if it were conservatives and Obama instead of liberals and McCain?
And if the tables were turned and the same done to Obama?
And, that gives you the right to manipulate search results how?
It is your OPINION, not fact. I notice no one elected or pointed you the guardians of truth.
If you don't like what the media is reporting, start your own media outlet. Don't decide to bias search results to your own political view.
If you believed your own words, you would stand behind them and not post as an AC
And, so, his answer is disinformation?
Imagine the outcry if a conservative blogger made such a statement.
Seems to me that this is basically a result of this asshole believing Obama can't win without such underhanded tricks.
I just don't worry about it. My boss never comes around. I have trained him well.
You need some more tin foil.... or Thorazine.