Slashdot Mirror


Student Faces 38 Years In Prison For Hacking Grades

the brown guy writes "An 18-year-old high school student named Omar Kahn is charged with 69 felonies for hacking into a school computer and modifying his grades, among other things. He changed his C, D and F grades to As, and changed 12 other students grades as well. By installing a remote access program on the school's server, Kahn was able to also change his AP scores and distribute test answer keys, and could be looking at a lengthy prison term. Not surprisingly, his parents (who have only recently immigrated to America) have decided not to post the $50,000 bail and Kahn is in jail awaiting trial."

645 comments

  1. Not a good hacker. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    He got caught - unlike me, because I didn't brag about it on a public web site...

    1. Re:Not a good hacker. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's how many criminals are caught, by bragging and showing off. Not smart.

    2. Re:Not a good hacker. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To Mr. Coward,
      Slashdot has been contacted and you should be expecting us shortly.
      Regards, Federal Bureau of Investigation

    3. Re:Not a good hacker. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Reminds me of a business school student who was caught hacking his way to president of the business school student body. He didn't verbally brag, but he arrogantly gave himself a landslide win - more votes than there were students. He didn't get prison but he didn't get his tuition back after being expelled.

    4. Re:Not a good hacker. by mark-t · · Score: 5, Informative

      He didn't get caught because he bragged. Evidently, he was caught after he requested an official school transcript for a university he was applying for.

      Of course, if you read the article, you'd know that.

      But hey, who reads articles? This is slashdot.

    5. Re:Not a good hacker. by packeteer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Criminals are not caught this way, amateurs are. This guy is clearly not a seasoned criminal and he should not be treated like one. I hope he does not get jail time from this. This is obviously just a kid making a mistake.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    6. Re:Not a good hacker. by dk.r*nger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      38 years in jail is way too steep, any jailtime would probably be.
      But this is no where near "just a mistake". It is not a one-time break-in to prove that security is insufficient. He was deliberately and continously (34 times alledgedly) "altering public records", for his own personal benefit.
      Even if your security is inadquate it doesn't mean that it's not a crime to break in, and even if it does, fraud is still fraud.

    7. Re:Not a good hacker. by tsm_sf · · Score: 1, Insightful

      He should get the exact same jail sentence as the people involved with the 2004 Ohio vote fraud.

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    8. Re:Not a good hacker. by Ken+Murray · · Score: 4, Informative

      Read about this in The Times newspaper in the UK. The female journalist questioned why society wasn't recognising this straight "F grades" kid as a "boy genius". How I laughed :-)

    9. Re:Not a good hacker. by sharperguy · · Score: 1

      I agree he should not receive jail time for this... seriously. A hefty fine [i]may[/i] be in order, depending on the circumstances (i didnt RTFA). If he's that good at breaking security (even if he fails at the hacker mentality), he could probably make a living despite not getting such good grades anyway so it was a pretty stupid thing to do.

      --
      "sudo rm -rf your-face"
    10. Re:Not a good hacker. by Ticklemonster · · Score: 1

      So he's not facing 38 years in prison for hacking his grades, he's facing 38 years in prison for all the other stuff, right? I wish they'd get the headline right. This is like "lesbians kicked out of ball park for kissing", when it turns out that they were kicked out for being belligerent beeyotches. I hate when the headline says something different from what the story says.

      --
      Karma: Bad is the liberal way of saying this guy won't drink the kool aid here on slash dot. I wear my Karma with pride
    11. Re:Not a good hacker. by nine-times · · Score: 4, Insightful

      38 years in jail is way too steep, any jailtime would probably be. But this is no where near "just a mistake". It is not a one-time break-in to prove that security is insufficient. He was deliberately and continously (34 times alledgedly) "altering public records", for his own personal benefit. Even if your security is inadquate it doesn't mean that it's not a crime to break in, and even if it does, fraud is still fraud.

      No, it's not "just a mistake". But in cases like this, I think it's important to keep perspective. The effective results of his actions weren't particularly criminal. I mean, yes, what he did was technically a crime, but the effects of the crime weren't particularly different from if he had just cheated outright.

      So probably (I'm guessing, because I don't know the kid or all the details) the guy deserves to be expelled, and put in a position where he really has to work his ass off to earn his way into any college. Community service wouldn't be a bad idea.

      But I agree, jail time sounds like a bad idea for a situation like this. It's not just "too harsh", but you have to wonder what the effects of sending him to jail would be.

      When your 18 years old, you still have a lot of time ahead of you, and a lot of learning-- for better or for worse. This guy probably still has the potential to turn it all around and be a productive member of society, but if you send him to jail, you're probably going to diminish that potential. Instead of learning to be productive, he'll be socialized to the jail environment, which means learning the wrong things, ie things that will actually make it harder for him to function appropriately in general society.

      I think we should generally be cautious about sending young people (even over the age of 18) to jail, unless we feel that they pose a significant continuing danger or that they absolutely cannot be rehabilitated.

    12. Re:Not a good hacker. by Lunarsight · · Score: 1

      I don't like it - you can tell while this kid lacks ethics, he has some serious skills.

      Rather than forcing him to waste his entire life away in prison, why not try and 'redeem' him instead?

      Should something like this ruin his entire life?

      At very least, give him an early parole for good behavior, for crying out loud.

    13. Re:Not a good hacker. by Talgrath · · Score: 4, Informative

      Let's take a look at the charges levied against the student:

      34 felony counts of altering public record
      11 felony counts of stealing and secreting public records
      7 felony counts of illegal computer access and fraud
      6 felony counts of burglary
      4 felony counts of identity theft
      3 felony counts of altering book of records
      2 felony counts of receiving stolen property
      1 felony count of conspiracy
      1 felony count of attempting altering of a public record

      And, as the article says, he's not just being charged with breaking in to the school's computers, he also put in a remote access program (which others could have used to do a variety of things with the school's network with). Then there's the fact that he broke into the principal's office to steal a test he did badly on. I think this individual, quite clearly, is a potential threat to other people. He sounds an awful lot like the sort of person who would do anything to get ahead; maybe in the future he could steal someone's identity to get a job or a loan. Do I necessarily think that 38 years is the amount of time he should do? No, but I don't think he'll do that much time either; he deserves to do some jail time though for his crimes.

    14. Re:Not a good hacker. by Talgrath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wouldn't be too sure on the skills part of it; most school networks are ridiculously easy to break into. School districts can't afford to hire good IT guys, so they pretty much get the bottom of the barrel; I remember that I once got access to all the teachers' files completely by accident. Fortunately (for the school district, at least) I was a rather good kid and showed them how I did it.

    15. Re:Not a good hacker. by Skye16 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Some jail; around 6 months.

      A far sight better than 38 years, which is more than some murderers get.

      When this student commits another crime in an attempt to get ahead, such as stealing an identity, and when he gets caught, then throw the book at him. But right now? It's kind of immoral to punish someone in advance for something we think it possible that they may do, at least without ample evidence that they are in the process of planning to do it in a very specific manner.

    16. Re:Not a good hacker. by Binder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Personally I think it is a shame that you get less prison time for murder than you do for hacking into your schools computers.

    17. Re:Not a good hacker. by Lunarsight · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be too sure on the skills part of it; most school networks are ridiculously easy to break into. School districts can't afford to hire good IT guys, so they pretty much get the bottom of the barrel; I remember that I once got access to all the teachers' files completely by accident. Fortunately (for the school district, at least) I was a rather good kid and showed them how I did it.

      Touche..

      In grammar school, we had a Radio Shack TRS-80 computer system. It was a central computer linked to a bunch of dumb terminals. One day, the principal was naive enough to type in the system password right in front of me.

      Sadly, I was smart enough to know how to get into the filing system, but still had no idea what the word PURGE meant yet. (So, you can imagine the end result wasn't that pretty.) I ended up deleting a bunch of essay files, and to make matters worse, I taught another half-dozen students how to do this.

      Now, I would have EASILY passed a truth-detector test, since I had absolutely no idea what I was doing. I didn't get into trouble because of that plausible deniability.

      ----

      With that said, I still hope they give this kid a chance to redeem himself. That's a long time in jail -- assuming he actually were to serve that full sentence, he'd be in his mid-50s before he got released. That might as well be your entire life.

    18. Re:Not a good hacker. by Lunarsight · · Score: 1

      In grammar school, we had a Radio Shack TRS-80 computer system. It was a central computer linked to a bunch of dumb terminals. One day, the principal was naive enough to type in the system password right in front of me.

      Oops - I forgot the most important part.

      It turns out the password was PASSWORD.

    19. Re:Not a good hacker. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that means we're running the risk that convicted (and already punished) criminals will be let back out onto our streets, and we can't stop running that risk until all of our Constitutional rights are being trampled!

      Only terrorists make mistakes!

      [/sarcasm][/sadbuttrue]

      This captcha thing is really freaky: "bendable", as in rules.

    20. Re:Not a good hacker. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Therefore, serial killers should get reduced sentences because they were caught, and therefore are simply amateurs who made a mistake?

    21. Re:Not a good hacker. by mpe · · Score: 1

      38 years in jail is way too steep, any jailtime would probably be.
      But this is no where near "just a mistake". It is not a one-time break-in to prove that security is insufficient. He was deliberately and continously (34 times alledgedly) "altering public records", for his own personal benefit.


      Sounds like he should be instead offered 38 years employment with the US Government...

    22. Re:Not a good hacker. by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Let's take a look at the charges levied against the student:

      34 felony counts of altering public record 11 felony counts of stealing and secreting public records 7 felony counts of illegal computer access and fraud 6 felony counts of burglary 4 felony counts of identity theft 3 felony counts of altering book of records 2 felony counts of receiving stolen property 1 felony count of conspiracy 1 felony count of attempting altering of a public record

      And, as the article says, he's not just being charged with breaking in to the school's computers, he also put in a remote access program (which others could have used to do a variety of things with the school's network with). Then there's the fact that he broke into the principal's office to steal a test he did badly on...

      Yes, and who was hurt in the end? What was damaged? What was the result of his crimes?

      As far as I can tell, the problems caused by his crimes are essentially the same as if he were cheating. Specifically, the people who might have been hurt if the guy hadn't been caught would be the other student who failed to get into college because this kid took a slot that would otherwise have been available.

      But (correct me if I'm wrong) nobody was directly harmed. Nothing of particular value was stolen. His actions were self-serving, but not malicious. He's potentially dangerous if his life takes the wrong turn, or potentially harmless if he learns the right things. A lot happens to a person between the ages of 18 and 28, and this guy will probably be a different person at the end of the next 10 years.

      So the question in my mind, primarily, is not whether this guy did "the wrong thing" and should theoretically be punished. He's already going to be punished. He'll have a hard time getting into any college, and for the rest of his life, whenever he's asked on an application as to whether he's been convicted of a felony, he'll have to check "yes". He's going to have a lot of trouble because of his actions.

      So the primary question in my mind is "what will give this guy the best chance of becoming a productive member of society?" Like, what events are most likely to turn him into a person that won't cause further trouble, or even more serious problems?

      I doubt that jail time will be terrifically helpful, and I'm sure that significant time in jail will be counter-productive. Community service may be helpful. The most helpful thing will probably be for someone to show him that he can still be successful if he works his ass off and earns back the trust that he's lost.

    23. Re:Not a good hacker. by the_rtb · · Score: 1

      Sounds like he'd make a perfect politician.

    24. Re:Not a good hacker. by curmudgeous · · Score: 1

      The ease of the crime doesn't mitigate the fact that it IS a crime. I've seen far too many comments on articles like this one that said, basically, "He shouldn't be punished because the other guy screwed up and made it easy..."

      If I forget to lock my front door that does not imply that you have permission to come in and steal my stuff. Accessing someone else's computer without their permission is a crime, regardless of how easy it was or how cool the hack.

    25. Re:Not a good hacker. by DiamondMX · · Score: 1

      38 years? That's insane...what there says this guy should get jail time at all? Pretty much burglary is the only real crime in there, otherwise - what's different from a guy who leaned over the table to write different letters on the teacher's grading paper. If the guy had edited the records on paper, he'd probably be getting a rap on the knuckles from the school - not a threat of jail time and a felony on his record. It's a clear case of (Crime a) 'On the Internets!'

    26. Re:Not a good hacker. by couchslug · · Score: 1

      He's an adult, not a "kid".
      He knew what he was doing.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    27. Re:Not a good hacker. by couchslug · · Score: 1

      He hasn't been SENTENCED. Sentencing usually is not to the maximum, but it pays to have that maximum available for people who aren't going to get the hint.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    28. Re:Not a good hacker. by Zemran · · Score: 1

      Rubbish, our honorable God, GW, has told us that all hackers, pirates and masturbaters are terrorists and must die. This boy is obviously associated with Al Qiada.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    29. Re:Not a good hacker. by cthulhu11 · · Score: 0

      People don't change or turn it all around. They just don't. Weasels in high school are still weasels 20 years later. Bums are still bums.

    30. Re:Not a good hacker. by nobaloney · · Score: 1

      Let's take a look at the charges levied against the student:

      34 felony counts of altering public record
      11 felony counts of stealing and secreting public records
      7 felony counts of illegal computer access and fraud
      6 felony counts of burglary
      4 felony counts of identity theft
      3 felony counts of altering book of records
      2 felony counts of receiving stolen property
      1 felony count of conspiracy
      1 felony count of attempting altering of a public record

      At first glance, that looks like a lot of charges. At second glance, it looks like the DA made all of them specifically to give himself bargaining power.

      Charges in cases brought at least partially for publicity (as this case most likely was) aren't meant to reflect a final case disposition, or even the DA's expectations.

    31. Re:Not a good hacker. by elmurado · · Score: 1, Funny

      So easy I hacked his report card:
      Maths: A
      Science: A
      English: A
      Hacking: F
      Shop: A

    32. Re:Not a good hacker. by prelelat · · Score: 1

      hey I work for a school district. I don't think my network is that bad. But we have guys at the main office who have standardized everything. We run this district like a company, students can have generic passwords but teachers are required more complex ones. Students at other schools(mine are all elementry they arn't much of a problem) have had students see a teacher or the admin type a pass and try to hack the network(sometimes the succeed), but we try to keep the network locked down and I haven't really heard of anyone breaking into the system with his own credentials.

  2. A for effort? by theascended · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even being a security researcher I might find some of those tasks non-trivial. In highschool I'm pretty sure that kind of action was out of my league. He has certainly learned something.

    1. Re:A for effort? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Including breaking and entering, stealing, and how to receive stolen property.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    2. Re:A for effort? by internetcommie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If he had put that much effort into studying and learned what he was supposed to, maybe he wouldn't have had to alter any records to get A's?

    3. Re:A for effort? by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      He still deserves to be punished for it, and he will be. He won't receive 38 years though, I could tell you that much without reading more than the headline.

      He'll probably receive a few years and get out after a couple of years on good behavior, and know not to put the kids who earned their marks at an unfair disadvantage in the future.

      Let's not make this kid into another Lamo; he doesn't deserve it.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    4. Re:A for effort? by vvaduva · · Score: 0

      I grew up in Europe. Cheating on tests in school is nothing foreign to public school students, so it's evident this kid brought that mentality with him here and thought he would get away with it. A lot of grade-keeping databases keep hashes and blind copies of grades stores in other places so it's likely that's how he got nailed.

    5. Re:A for effort? by WDot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The school I remember wasn't the most locked down place. We used to have testing software that would quiz students on books they read. That was a mandatory grade and everyone had to do several. The application, and all the records associated with it, got deleted--twice.

      I'm not trying to diminish his achievements, I think somebody should be offering him a job or a fat scholarship right now. I'm simply saying it may be more trivial to wreak havoc in a high school than it would be a business.

      That said, 38 years is too harsh for playing with grades and distributing answer keys. He's not going to become a healthy contributing member of society by going to prison for 38 years, and what damage has he done? Oh yes, he's inconvenienced the teachers a lot, but that's about it.

      I thought teachers were supposed to mold students into model citizens, not get stupid amounts of vengeance upon them when they break their toys.

      Everyone on Slashdot already knows this, but hey staff at Tesoro High school: DON'T PUT SENSITIVE DATA ON MACHINES CONNECTED TO A NETWORK! Obviously you need to do your grades the old-fashioned way: Pen and paper.

    6. Re:A for effort? by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      Insane, no matter how you add up.
      He would have been better off with first degree murder in my home country, he could receive 21 years at the most for it. 38 years is just so insane that if you don't understand that it is insane, you should see a shrink.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    7. Re:A for effort? by TheGavster · · Score: 4, Informative

      This guy was actually at a really expensive private school, one of the best from an academic standpoint in the country.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    8. Re:A for effort? by drpimp · · Score: 1

      I work for an educational software company. Speaking with some people at districts these days you find them speaking of teens generally being more tech savvy these days. It says he used a stolen login. That's not hard to acquire considering some people are quite lax with their password strength. The slashdot crowd would be appalled by some of the passwords I see teachers and district workers have using our software. I'd be willing to bet they use the same passwords for their districts, as well as their personal emails. We try to enforce passwords for some people, but many use integration to authenticate from their own LDAP or whatever. It doesn't say which remote software he used, but a compromised login, some "Video Professor", and some "GoTo My PC" I am sure it doesn't take a genius get into some school remotely. I say this with the clause that _some_ school districts have actually hired people that know how to run a network/systems such that this kind of thing could have never happened, but again I see it time and time again that some schools districts are WIDE OPEN to problems such as this. I won't even get into how some of these student information systems are as far as security, but put it this way, if you had Notepad and some shared drive accessible, it's game over in some cases if some student stumbles across these data files.

      --
      -- Brought to you by Carl's JR
    9. Re:A for effort? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's 18. You're suppose to get into trouble. Many of us did, and we turned out alright after.

    10. Re:A for effort? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      just a point, if it's to be believed. One of the comments on the article is from someone who claims to be from the school who suggests all he actually did was install a keylogger and in fact knows virtually nothing about computers. It's quite possible that people less technologically capable in the news are blowing this up into a "master hacker" sort of idea.

    11. Re:A for effort? by Sancho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This kid is facing multiple counts. He's not facing 38 years for hacking his grades, he's facing a combined 38 years for over 69 individual offenses. Almost certainly, no single one of them carries a 21 year sentence.

    12. Re:A for effort? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1, Insightful
      "This kid is facing multiple counts. He's not facing 38 years for hacking his grades, he's facing a combined 38 years for over 69 individual offenses. Almost certainly, no single one of them carries a 21 year sentence."

      Geez...didn't any of these people in charge watch Wargames or Ferris Bueller?

      This is something kids do...smart kids usually.

      Sure, you punish him when caught, but, you don't end his life. He didn't hurt anyone...he didn't even hurt the systems he was in. Give him a fair punishment...maybe lots of community service and keep him off a computer for a year maybe...but, he doesn't deserver to lose his whole future.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    13. Re:A for effort? by mfnickster · · Score: 2, Funny

      This guy was actually at a really expensive private school, one of the best from an academic standpoint in the country.

      Yep, I hear ALL the students there are 'A' students! :)

      --
      "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
    14. Re:A for effort? by labmonkey09 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The penalties will likely run concurrently. Sequential time is reserved for serious felonies.

      --
      /LabMonkey09
    15. Re:A for effort? by NormalVisual · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He hasn't even been convicted of anything yet. It's just a sensationalist headline that should read "Student could face up to 38 years...". He almost certainly will not be convicted of all the charges pending against him, and I will be surprised if he receives any prison time at all.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    16. Re:A for effort? by NeilTheStupidHead · · Score: 4, Interesting

      During my first year of post-secondary education, but the introductory physics and calculus classes administered quizes and assignments through a flash-based web-app. The school's computers all used IE 5 at the time (2000/2001) but if you logged in through the school's network using your own computer, you could access all the material. Using Netscape on my laptop, I remember that I used to be prompted before submitting the results from the flash app (Netscape security to the rescue). The app calculated the score itself and reported only the score to the server. It was a simply matter not to transmit the score and refresh the page to try again if people weren't happy with their scores.

      --
      Lose: misplace or fail || Loose: not bound together
    17. Re:A for effort? by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      This is almost certainly the case.

      When two teenage morons^Wscript kiddies from Croatia "hacked the Pentagon", the media hyped them up as master hackers. It led to people sending them money to replace the computers confiscated by the police.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    18. Re:A for effort? by SStrungis · · Score: 1
      He won't be convicted of every charge. He won't get 38 years in jail. He will, however, have the shiat scared out of him as he's been arrested and incarcerated for doing what a lot of smart-ass seniors do with the school network--compromise it simply because they can. It's a lot of fun for HS students to attempt an end-run around IT policies in class just so that they can play stupid Flash games.

      Every youngster thinks they're immortal and can't be hurt, arrested, or killed. I'm glad this little creep learned early.

      S

    19. Re:A for effort? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      " I will be surprised if he receives any prison time at all"

      According to TFS he is already in jail and they are demanding $50K bail, it's already in the "insane" category.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    20. Re:A for effort? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      This story has been in the O.C.Register a little bit. I can not help but wonder if the punishment was a little bit excessive. But I think a couple of recruiting sargents, some corporate lawyers, and a couple of FBI types might want to go an visit this guy. Of course, if the goods guys think they hold all the cards, maybe going over to the local Blockbuster and renting "Swordfish" might be a nice casual way to cool the summer off; especially after last nights little mini heat wave. Personally, I think the FBI will have the better dental plan.

    21. Re:A for effort? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Including breaking and entering, stealing, and how to receive stolen property."

      Yep. If he broke in and changed dead-tree records it would not have made Slashdot.

      I say crush him and make an example to others. He was smart enough to know what he was doing was
      illegal.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    22. Re:A for effort? by vajaradakini · · Score: 1

      If watching Law and Order has taught me anything, a person is held in jail before being tried and only then can they be bailed out (if someone could be bailed out after being convicted then a rich person could commit murder and basically face a fine).

      --
      what's that now?
    23. Re:A for effort? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even being a security researcher I might find some of those tasks non-trivial. I'm sorry but there was nothing extraordinary about what he did. If the network was not tightly locked down (and being a school I doubt it was) then all it would take is minimal computer knowledge and the ability to read tutorials on all the skript kiddy sites out there.
    24. Re:A for effort? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not trying to diminish his achievements, I think somebody should be offering him a job or a fat scholarship right now. He put a keylogger on a teachers system and then used that password to log on to a server where he installed VNC. How is that any kind of "achievement?" The guy wasn't even skilled enough to be called a script kiddie.
    25. Re:A for effort? by wass · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Reminds me of a story about my father when he was back in school.

      He had a French test on verb conjugation coming up, so instead of studing he spent much time making a clever crib sheet mechanism into his watch, so that he could scroll through the crib sheet.

      Anyway, while 'preparing', he kept rewriting the crib sheet smaller and smaller to fit more stuff on it. Ironically, when he went to take the test, he already knew the material from all his recopying that he didn't even need to cheat.

      --

      make world, not war

    26. Re:A for effort? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "He hasn't even been convicted of anything yet. It's just a sensationalist headline that should read "Student could face up to 38 years...". He almost certainly will not be convicted of all the charges pending against him, and I will be surprised if he receives any prison time at all."

      Thing is, this minor should not even be charged with so much, they're throwing the book at a kid that did nothing more that change some grades. Hell, we have trouble charging kids that fucking murder their entire families as adults, yet they're trying to throw the book at this kid for something this harmless?

      Let the punishment fit the crime. This poor kid is in jail right now...that is traumatic, and he didn't do anything violent.

      Not to mention...if he is charged with this many crimes...they WILL try to prosecute him on all of them. What if they do all stick?? It isn't like they charge a person with a ton of crimes and say, nah...we're not going to try to pursue them all. If charged with all of the...there is a chance he could have all of them stick.

      This is just not right.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    27. Re:A for effort? by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      Well, an academic comparison is generally between the 'A' students of the institutions being compared; the fellow in the article obviously wasn't taking advantage of what the school offered him. My point is just that this wasn't some daycare-style public school where he was bored and lashing out, but that there was actually the opportunity for him to get a real education there that he turned down in favor of cheating.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    28. Re:A for effort? by manekineko2 · · Score: 1

      This guy was actually at a really expensive private school, one of the best from an academic standpoint in the country.

      Another post above this claims he was a student at Tesoro High School, a public school in California, albeit probably a pretty decent one.
    29. Re:A for effort? by hemorex · · Score: 1

      Ah, he proved he was smarter than his educators, and we all know they can't stand that!

    30. Re:A for effort? by weirdcrashingnoises · · Score: 1

      lol thats funny. i went to a community college and profs could determine how many times you could take an online quiz, a lot of them just set the limit to 0 (infinite, obviously) so u could take over and over again not even "cheating"

      shows how far our education has come :D lol

      --
      sigs... don't talk to me about sigs....
    31. Re:A for effort? by Nutria · · Score: 1

      He would have been better off with first degree murder in my home country, he could receive 21 years at the most for it. 38 years is just so insane that if you don't understand that it is insane, you should see a shrink.

      Did you miss the part where he is charged with 69 FELONIES, including burglary and receiving stolen property?

      Anyway, there's no way he'll be in prison more than 7 years.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    32. Re:A for effort? by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      I know you were trolling but I just had to reply. I attended public schools while growing up. I had an education that rivaled the best that any private school could have offered. We just had really good public schools in my home town. Now I'm still at a public school (for grad school) that is better than ANY private school for my field. There are a lot of worthless public schools just as there are a lot of worthless private schools.

    33. Re:A for effort? by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      recent immigrant, non- or limited English speaker... no wonder he did bad in school.

      his parents were idiots for taking him out of school in his home country so freaking late.

    34. Re:A for effort? by ruin20 · · Score: 1

      It's called a bail bondsman, they only need to raise 5k and if they aren't doing that then I'm pretty sure it's because the time served plays well in both the press and the sentencing.

      --
      Oh honey look... How cute... an angry slashdotter!
    35. Re:A for effort? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sorry, vajar, but you can't learn much law by watching Law & Order. In nearly every state, the bail process works like this:

      First, a person is arraigned which means he is brought before a court which decides whether there's enough evidence to have a trial. At or after the arraignment, bail may be set based on the severity of the crime(s) and the court's assessment of the likelihood that he'll show up for trial if he's allowed out on bail.

      Then, if he is convicted of one or more crimes, and files a timely notice that he's appealing the conviction, there may be another opportunity for him to seek bail pending the outcome of the appeal.

    36. Re:A for effort? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      I think somebody should be offering him a job or a fat scholarship right now.
      Great idea. So then anytime someone wants a scholarship, or a job, they simply hack their grades and own up to it.
    37. Re:A for effort? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      this minor

      18 years old is not a minor. Good try, though

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    38. Re:A for effort? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Ok..I missed the age..but, still...close enough to give a break. He was a highschool student.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    39. Re:A for effort? by shiftless · · Score: 1

      If he had put that much effort into studying and learned what he was supposed to, maybe he wouldn't have had to alter any records to get A's?

      What fun is that?

    40. Re:A for effort? by POTSandPANS · · Score: 1

      From reading about what he did to change the records, I don't think it was very difficult. I'm pretty sure he did put about as much effort into studying as he did into this "hack".

    41. Re:A for effort? by mxs · · Score: 1

      If he had put that much effort into studying and learned what he was supposed to, maybe he wouldn't have had to alter any records to get A's? You are assuming an awful lot about that school's security.

      I spent a year at a Texan High School once, as a junior. The computer and network security there was so bad, you would not believe it. Changing my grades (or even wreaking REAL mayhem) would have been rather trivial. Just some examples as to what you will find in the wild :

      "Student" Network and "Administrative" Network, with different internet connections (T1 on the student network, dialup on the administrative network). Good idea. Implementation : they both run on the same wires, separated by RFC 1918 spaces (one was 10.x.x.x, one was 172.16.x.x). From a computer in the student computer lab, if you looked at wire traffic, you would see plenty of broadcast traffic of both networks.

      "Internet Gateway" : 10.X.1.1 was the gateway for my school. telnet 10.X.1.1 gets you into the administrative interface thereof. No password, no IP checks. Trivial to shut it down, trivial to reroute packets. Oh, and 10.Y.1.1 would get me into the gateway of another school in the district. Same configuration. Naive as I was then, when I noticed this I notified my teacher, who encouraged me to call network support at the district; I got connected to an administrator there. The entire exchange was pretty much "Hi, I noticed that under 10.X.1.1 you could telnet into the administrative interface, and it was not password protected. You might want to fix that." "Ok. Please let me talk to your teacher." "Get that student away from the network, and revoke all his privileges."
      Luckily, my teacher was able to think for himself.

      (This was fairly early in my first semester there. Before I left after my second, I checked whether any of this had changed -- the routers were still accessible that way, still unprotected).

      Note that I did not even have to look for these things (nor did I, actually). I noticed the broadcast traffic when trying to troubleshoot the network connectivity of a freshly installed Linux box there, and the open router when accidentlly mistyping an IP (I meant to type 10.X.11.1 instead of 10.X.1.1, since 10.X.11.1 was another linux machine I wanted to telnet into; yeah, I know, telnet sucks :)

      The grades for that entire school (as well as attendance records, personal information on all the students, etc.) was handled by a UNIX server; guidance councillors would have a telnet session to that server open and do their work through that. When in the councillor's office you could see the IP of that server, as well as that it was a telnet connection. Needless to say, if you had any social engineering skills at all, or were able to read as councillors input their passwords, you would have had full access to all of those records. I did not pursue this, as, quite frankly, I had no interest to do so without supervision and permission. However, that attack vector would have been somewhat trivial (lab machines were running Windows; you could get to the network settings quite easily. Just set up the right address and netmask, and telnet to that machine -- remember, the two networks are connected ...)

      Another interesting tidbit (and I did this supervised with nmap) : The machine was a HP-UX 9 server with more than a dozen open ports, some of which displaying nice version banners, at least two of which there were known security holes for. I did not mount an attack or exploit on the server, but, quite frankly, if anybody were determined to change their grades, they'd probably have an easy enough time doing so; same for wreaking havoc for the multiple-thousand student body.

      Incidentally, the year after I left, they started offering Cisco Networking courses there. One of them dealt with security. I wonder when the first malicious student figured this stuff out; the skills required, however, are not so extensive as to require training equivalent to achieving an excellent academic record.

    42. Re:A for effort? by SeeSp0tRun · · Score: 1

      It is possible to commit 69 individual offenses in one day. Say you plan to murder someone, if you mention it to anybody and they think you're kidding and never mention it... conspiracy, aiding a felon, and accomplice to murder.
      This is obviously a fabrication, but just shows that all 69 charges could be from the same day/week. It doesn't signify that the kid has been hacking and stealing identities for the last 10 years.

      --
      Something witty.
    43. Re:A for effort? by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Erm, did you mean to reply to me? I don't get how this is relevant to what I said.

      My point was that the 38 years described in the article is for 69 offenses, compared to 21 years for a single offense of murder in whatever country the person to whom I replied resides.

    44. Re:A for effort? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Here in Australia it also works in a similar manner to what the AC post said about the states, I assume it comes from English common law but I don't know for sure. OTOH, you are correct that a convicted person (who has exhasted the appeal process) has no right to bail, however neither I nor TFA imply that is the case here?

      BTW: I'm a big fan of law and order but learning law from watching it is like learning science from watching star trek.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    45. Re:A for effort? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      He almost certainly will not be convicted of all the charges pending against him
      Are you the judge in his trial or something?
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    46. Re:A for effort? by vajaradakini · · Score: 1

      *shrugs* I don't live in the US so it doesn't matter to me too much if I get the details of American law wrong. :P

      --
      what's that now?
    47. Re:A for effort? by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      If he put that much effort into studying as he was "supposed to", he'd probably be wasting his time just the same.

    48. Re:A for effort? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are so right, don't make that mistake on /. again. you will always be -1 troll when you swim against the current.

      read this:
      http://www.cantrip.org/gatto.html

      and much more importantly, this:
      http://www.egwtext.whiteestate.org/gc/gc.html

    49. Re:A for effort? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i heard about this on npr last week. this punishment is way too harsh. this kid does not deserve any time in prison. that is ridiculous. its bad enough that he will not be able to go to college and probably be forced to join the military and fight in iraq. our prisons are overcrowded enough. they don't need student hackers in there.

    50. Re:A for effort? by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      No, he would still only face a total of 21 years, all charges combined. Is that so hard to get?

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
  3. A better list of charges by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is the list of charges against Khan

    34 felony counts of altering public record
    11 felony counts of stealing and secreting public records
    7 felony counts of illegal computer access and fraud
    6 felony counts of burglary
    4 felony counts of identity theft
    3 felony counts of altering book of records
    2 felony counts of receiving stolen property
    1 felony count of conspiracy
    1 felony count of attempting altering of a public record

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    1. Re:A better list of charges by Bandman · · Score: 4, Funny

      "You said altering records twice"

      "I like altering records"

    2. Re:A better list of charges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. I agree that he should be punished, but 38 years is ridiculous.

      He didn't commit murder; he didn't even hurt anyone physically. I think prison terms should be limited to the current age of the person for crimes that don't physically harm someone.

    3. Re:A better list of charges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the sixth day of trials, Omar Khan was charged with
      6 counts of burglary
      5 changed grades
      4 counts of identity theft
      3 counts of altering records
      2 counts of receiving stolen property
      and a partridge in a pear tree!

    4. Re:A better list of charges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      reason number 423 why i will never understand legal jargon:

      "11 felony counts of stealing and secreting public records"

      how do you steal and "secreting" (???) PUBLIC records... especially if this information is electronic, it's not like he walked off with the one and only hard copy that they had. (or maybe he did?)

    5. Re:A better list of charges by mauthbaux · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, if his current modus operandi continues, I suspect the court's records will soon show his list of charges as being:

      34 felony counts of awesomeness
      11 felony counts of 1337 5ki11z.
      7 felony counts of pwning n00bs.
      6 felony counts of acting as an electronics deity.
      4 felony counts of extreme overclocking.
      3 felony counts of proving the Goldbach conjecture.
      2 felony counts of saving the world from the Covenant.
      1 felony count of conspiracy to pwn.
      1 felony count of actually winning a fight against Chuck Norris.

      --
      "Operating systems suck: you're better off using only the BIOS" --trainsaw.com
    6. Re:A better list of charges by trolltalk.com · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of course, if he really was a "1337 h4x0r" he'd have only bumped up a few of his grades, not given himself straight "A"s.

      Additionally, the trial would have gone something like this: "The charges are ... uhmmm, sorry, but we can't seem to find anything about this guy in our system, hour honor. [mumble] I *know* I saw it yesterday ...[/mumble]"

    7. Re:A better list of charges by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      Wow. His principal's favorite web site: http://www.khaaan.com/

    8. Re:A better list of charges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DaveV1.0 stated "34 felony counts of altering public record" and "1 felony count of attempting altering of a public record."

    9. Re:A better list of charges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you think....

      What if after he gets indicted, he changes the Court's records as well? What then?

    10. Re:A better list of charges by lubricated · · Score: 5, Funny


      Here is the list of charges against Khan

      34 felony counts of altering public record
      11 felony counts of stealing and secreting public records
      7 felony counts of illegal computer access and fraud
      6 felony counts of burglary
      4 felony counts of identity theft
      3 felony counts of altering book of records
      2 felony counts of receiving stolen property
      1 felony count of conspiracy
      1 felony count of attempting altering of a public record
      </blockquote>
      KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN!
      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    11. Re:A better list of charges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and a partridge in a pear tree?

    12. Re:A better list of charges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      L0L 1337 H4x0r pwnage. Chuck Norris was proud when it happened...and then he killed him.

    13. Re:A better list of charges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      secreting = hiding the stolen goods

    14. Re:A better list of charges by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "3 felony counts of proving the Goldbach conjecture."
      You were on a roll until this one. If he knew what the Goldbach conjecture was, he wouldn't need to modify his grades in the first place.
      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    15. Re:A better list of charges by Cyko_01 · · Score: 1
      no, he said

      34 felony counts of altering public record and

      1 felony count of attempting altering of a public record
    16. Re:A better list of charges by celle · · Score: 1

      Somehow, someway, I think we have too many overlapping laws. I think we need to lynch a few congressmen (many are lawyers) and shrink the law down to something a peasant can understand and deal with.

    17. Re:A better list of charges by jonaskoelker · · Score: 3, Funny

      11 felony counts of stealing and secreting public records How do you secrete public records? "Help, I'm bleeding highway routes and education budgets!"
    18. Re:A better list of charges by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here is the list of charges against Khan

      No, those are the charges against Kahn. The charges against Khan are a lot worse.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    19. Re:A better list of charges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To me, this is a little obscene. The (potential) punishment does not fit the crime.

      It seems to me this is eerily close to Double Jeopardy (albeit he is getting one trial it just seems that multiple felonies are per offense he committed).

      If i break into a home--and steal all of the silverware of someone, and get caught--is the standard procedure to charge the burglar with 50 counts of theft, one per piece of silverware?

      I am honestly curious if that is standard procedure, or if their making an example out of this case---of if they treat computer related crimes differently.

    20. Re:A better list of charges by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      Out of season, but...

      34 felony counts of awesomeness
      11 felony counts of 1337 5ki11z.
      7 felony counts of pwning n00bs.
      6 felony counts of acting as an electronics deity.
      4 felony counts of extreme overclocking.
      3 felony counts of proving the Goldbach conjecture.
      2 felony counts of saving the world from the Covenant.
      1 felony count of conspiracy to pwn.

      1 felony count of a partridge in a pear tree.
      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
    21. Re:A better list of charges by denmarkw00t · · Score: 1

      Of course, if he really was a "1337 h4x0r" he'd have only bumped up a few of his grades, not given himself straight "A"s.

      Yeah, he even could've taken it a step further and altered the system in a way that only his transcripts were altered - he still would have failed but he might have gotten away with having an altered transcript, especially since only a handful of people see them between the school and the student.

      Another thing is that, well, even the gthmm notes that covering your tracks is important, and if you don't know how to do that then you shouldn't even be looking at the data on another computer because you're out in the open.

    22. Re:A better list of charges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about half their age, or maybe a quarter.

      I mean at 18 if you spent 3-9 years in jail, that's a pretty significant chuck of your early adulthood life. You scale it up to 30-40 and it's a pretty good chunk of your middle life (but since you're quite a bit older it may or may not seem as long since you've got a longer point of reference. Also by that age you should be more aware of the consequences of your actions, which in an ideal world you'd know as a juvenile, but judging from a lot of dumb 16-26 year old males, they really don't.)

    23. Re:A better list of charges by couchslug · · Score: 1

      If we want to stop people from doing this, we need to make it painful when they are caught.

      If he wasn't eager to be punished he wouldn't have done the deed. He is an adult, and should
      be treated like one.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    24. Re:A better list of charges by SwordsmanLuke · · Score: 1

      he'd have only bumped up a few of his grades, not given himself straight "A"s. Actually, I had some friends in high school who did just that. And, sure enough, they got away with it. It helped that they were already good students and so it wasn't major changes. Just a few bumps across the board to go from an B+ to an A.

      The fun thing was when people would pick on them, they'd go and mark that person absent for several days through the semester. See, the grading program would automatically fail anyone with more than 6 absences in a class...
      --
      Any plan which depends on a fundamental change in human behavior is doomed from the start.
  4. it'll be reduced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to like 3-5

    1. Re:it'll be reduced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the lower end of the punishment-scale for commiting manslaugther in other countries.

  5. Cumulative... by Beetle+B. · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Summary is unnecessarily sensational.

    I'm willing to bet the 38 years is if he gets convicted for all the charges, and doesn't get any concurrent sentencing - very unlikely.

    --
    Beetle B.
    1. Re:Cumulative... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Yes and no.

      No doubt this is what he's being threatened with in the initial rounds of poker style plea bargain negotiations.

      If he told took a principled stand, they would probably only prosecute for the charges they thought they could prove. This would not add up to 38 years. Even if they did prosecute him for all of them, and he was found guilty of all of them, it's still unlikely that he would be dealt the full sentence.

    2. Re:Cumulative... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I emphatically disagree. The fact that "The People" put so much into this as to come up with a long list of felony charges is necessarily disturbing and worth emphasis.

    3. Re:Cumulative... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He will be punished in a strictly single-threaded process.

  6. ST2 greets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Khaaaaaaaaan!"

  7. Jail time, that will teach him by sanferrera · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's amazing how they can turn a talented, although with obvious problems kid, into an outwright criminal. He is 18, for God's sake!!

    1. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Bandman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, I'm not going to argue that he's obviously talented, but that's the sort of talent that gets you thrown into jail when misapplied

    2. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by The+Snowman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If he is guilty of those charges, he is a criminal. Those actions undermine society's trust in the system that if someone graduates from an institution and that institution certifies that the student did what the records say they did, they may or may not be qualified for jobs, further education, etc. While 38 years is certainly harsh, that is criminal behavior. Our education system is far from perfect but guys like this certainly do not help make it better.

      I would much rather that he applied himself to do well in school and set a good example of what good behavior, studying, and hard work can do when working with the grain, not against it.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    3. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it would be nice if we could be more forgiving until kids reach an age where they can be responsible for their own actions. Like, 18.

    4. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      He seemed to accomplish that himself - not that I disagree that jail time will harden him however.

    5. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know. If you are willing to break into the school's system to improve your grades, and generally compromise their data, I am not sure it is _they_ turning you into a criminal. I think, if you do that, _you_ are already over the line.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    6. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Libertarian001 · · Score: 1

      No, this kid turned himself into a criminal. Were there no laws on the books prohibiting his actions he would still deserve a serious ass-kicking.

      Yes, he's 18, old enough to know better.

    7. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This post not meant at you, rather the guy that seems to think it's ok to send a kid to prison for 38 years for this.

    8. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Bieeanda · · Score: 4, Informative
      The 'he's only a kid!' defense does not apply to someone who is legally an adult.

      Also, he is an outright criminal. This isn't just Ferris Bueller slipping in to adjust his grades a little because he's too cool for school. Burglary, identity theft, multiple counts of fraud? Bueller? Bueller?

    9. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by harry666t · · Score: 1

      > Those actions undermine society's trust in the system
      > that if someone graduates from an institution (...)

      Makes me think, how many did not get caught?

    10. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      like a hammer.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    11. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      A school is a place of learning. If this kid was more capable than the teachers in the school (which is very likely) then they should have let him pass with A's on principle.

      For far too long I've sat and watched athletes graduate with straight A's despite blatantly cheating on every test and not knowing the difference between Canada and Australia, while truly competent students are fighting over B's and if they're really lucky actually getting an A.

      There is a monumental shift in College where the teachers actually act like professors and are no longer dumbfucks.

      I have no doubt in my mind that "hacking the system" in this case means walking over to the teacher's spreadsheet while he's not looking and manually writing in an A for his grade and a few others.

      High schools and their faculty have never been brighter than the dimmest lamp at midnight.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    12. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They didn't "turn him" into anything. He's a criminal. Period. I could write it off as misguided teenage mischief if he had changed his own grades. Maybe even a grade or two for a girl he was attempting to woo, but he changed grades for twelve people, stole tests and answers and distributed them, and burglarized his school to cover up the fact that - even after proving he could steal test and answers - he was still cheating.

      Where's the "talent?" The only thing he did was read someone's password to initially "hack" the system, and I'll bet $20 that the "remote access program" was something he downloaded from some site with a name like "Teh Supar-3v1L Bl4ck Haxx0rZ La1r!" Giving him a pass because it's a nonviolent crime makes as much sense as letting off anybody who tunnels into a bank because they were clever. He's not talented, he's a sociopath. He should be expelled from school and they should staple a copy of the police report to any transcript they send to a college.

    13. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      penitentiary... root word: penitence. make an example of him

      people seem to think that only crime with violence should be punished. punish them all. whether they physically break into your house or virtually, it is still a crime, even if no-one was hurt. That is why you can shoot someone when they break into your home in America. A law I really love and wish would be adopted in Canada. Too bad they can't find something similar when you catch someone hacking into your system.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    14. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by stainlesssteelpat · · Score: 0

      You know deontology has some good points and all. But aplying Kantian philosophy to an 18 year old by throwing him into a cell for 10-30yrs for fraud is ridiculous. No-one got hurt, sure he needs to be punished but hell make it relevant. He was flunking school and essentially cheated through him in a minimum security jail and leave him there till he gets his A+ average in his exams and then let him out. Justice and morals have their place in society, but this is just taking the piss. If it was white collar crime for millions, say here in australia you'd get a two year minimum security sentence for ruining thousands of lives. Thats more or less saying hey mate, bad luck you got caught better luck next time. Meanwhile a kid makes a big mistake and they take most of his life from him?

      --
      War is the statesman's game, the priest's delight, the lawyer's jest, the hired assassin's trade.- Shelley
    15. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While 38 years is certainly harsh, that is criminal behavior.

      Thirty. Eight. Years. I am far from a bleeding heart, but my God, man! Imagine walking out of high school on your last day and realizing you're now 56. He'll miss the best 4 decades of his life. That's basically life in prison!

      The pendulum's swung, and we have to get some sanity back into sentencing.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    16. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by vertinox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Our education system is far from perfect but guys like this certainly do not help make it better.

      So instead of just banning him from college or high school graduation, we make him a ward of the state costing us more tax money than he would have flipping burgers?

      And when he does get out of jail, do you think hanging out with rapists, drug addicts, and murders is going to make him turn into a model citizen?

      If we only focused more effort into catching true identity thieves who actually have stolen money and caused untold suffering on thousands of people than someone who cheated.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    17. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      The guy is most certainly a criminal. The question is what will his place in society be in 38 years? A 56 year old who has spend more than 2/3 of his life in prison is going to be a waste of a person, not to mention the resources that will be needed to support them. Beyond punitive retribution for wrongs committed, there needs to be some kind of constructive correction.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    18. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, grades are not an indiciation of qualification for jobs or further education. The only actual crime mentioned in the article is breaking and entering and possibly theft of a test. Undermining society's trust in the system is NOT a crime -- it's a virtue.

    19. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Danse · · Score: 1

      Those actions undermine society's trust in the system that if someone graduates from an institution and that institution certifies that the student did what the records say they did, they may or may not be qualified for jobs, further education, etc. Guys that steal billions from people usually face a lot less time than this. Even the possibility of a 38 year sentence makes our judicial system seem utterly ridiculous.
      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    20. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by ThorGod · · Score: 1

      I honestly agree. Everyone should be held to the same metric. Well, except those with bonefide learning disabilities. (Though, those are frequently over diagnosed, as well...don't get me started on that end.)

      At the end of the day, though, there will always be that element that simply copies, by hand, what others have done. In many cases that's very easy to get away with because the solutions are, by nature, very similar.

      What made this case so horrible is he was obviously gearing up for grade fixing en masse. That's when he starts to be more like an organized crime boss and less like a bored student.

      --
      PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    21. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      there's fair and then there's fair.

      why can't punishment actually FIT the crime or at least be proportional to it.

      if there's anyone, here, who thinks a person deserves to have their entire life ruined for such a soft victimless crime like this, I hope you never have karma come back to bite you.

      for all you 'hang him high!' idiots out there, a little compassion in life never hurt. part of the human equation is compassion. HE'S A KID. punish him but please, don't ruin his whole life!

      (and if NONE of that works, well, what would jesus do?. is throwing away a kid for half his life any kind of christian act?)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    22. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is 18, for God's sake!! But, were he say, 19, then he would be an adult and would deserve to be damned for his crime.
    23. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Or maybe some sanity in the charging? Because that 38 years is maximum sentencing on 69 total charges. That's a little over 6 months on average for each charge, but they add up when they count each record altered as a separate offense.

    24. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by stainlesssteelpat · · Score: 0
      Frank Abignail was a kid who turned himself into a criminal and should have known better. This kid, like most, did not consider school to be inside of societies legal constraints. That's a serious error of judgement and if he'd been aware of the consequences then his actions may well have been different. Yet it's not necessarily the criminal act it's being made out to be. Yeah, he doeas deserve an ass kicking, but punishment should be fitting.

      Making an example of people just means that other people will be more careful to avoid getting caught. Look at Plato's Dialogue on the Ring of Gyges Plato was damn astute for his time, and got the morality of the masses down to a fine art.

      How much better did any of us know at 18, can you legally drink in the US at 18? So why if your not treated as a full member of society should you be expected to behave and be punished as one? I'm not advocating a break with SCT, it's done the world a lot of good. However, I am questioning it.

      --
      War is the statesman's game, the priest's delight, the lawyer's jest, the hired assassin's trade.- Shelley
    25. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Those actions undermine society's trust in the system The emperor has no clothes.

      Those actions don't change reality, they only change the perception of reality. We shouldn't put so much trust in the system to begin with -- if a teenager with a piss-poor GPA could rig the system, we ought to be asking how many other people have rigged the system already.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    26. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly he deserves some kind of punishment. 38 years for hacking, when rapists and murders get off on less time. Just plain off of the top of my head, I'd give this kid the same amount of time as Martha Stewart's insider trading thing. They both undermined a system designed to provide fair rules for all in order to receive personal gains.

    27. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      I usually ask myself: "What would Khorne do?".
      On an unrelated note, what is this "compassion" you speak of?
      :P

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    28. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      This is exactly the kind of crime where community service should be the sentence. He's demonstrated that he has some skills, let him use them for the benefit of the community. Securing all of the school computers in the district sounds like a good punishment. Pay him minimum wage while he's doing this, and expect him to spend a full working week on it until it's done. It's a lot cheaper than prison, and the injured party gets something useful out of it. He gets some valuable experience, but can't get a better-paying job until the task is completed.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    29. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by lena_10326 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, I'm not going to argue that he's obviously talented, but that's the sort of talent that gets you thrown into jail when misapplied
      Wake up! Jail time for changing grades, man. Snap out of it.

      Jail time is not the solution for everything.

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    30. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by itinko · · Score: 1

      18 is not a kid by a long stretch. We send 18 year olds to Iraq to kill people. He knew exactly what he was doing.

    31. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Firehed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What if he was 17? It's not as if he suddenly knows better at 18 than at 17. I was in... I think fifth grade when I was able to "hack" other students' accounts on our school system. This bizarre combination of logging out of Win3.11 into our DOS menu system, some sort of obscure series of commands, and then typing in the account name and no need to have a password. I never did anything with it other than feel special in being able to do so; still, even back then (age 11?) I knew that it wasn't really OK and that altering anyone else's files definitely wasn't. Granted I had a better sense of judgment than most my age, but even still he absolutely knew better at 18, and also would were he several years younger.

      And Bueller didn't adjust his grades - that was David Lightman in WarGames (same actor though).

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    32. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by overunderunderdone · · Score: 1

      It's amazing how they can turn a talented, although with obvious problems kid, into an outwright criminal.
      I'm confused. Are you suggesting that "they" induced him into committing these crimes? Or do you have some other definition of criminal? (Hint: the definition is "someone who commits a crime") As far as I could tell he turned himself into a criminal without "their" help, and "they" simply caught him.

      He is 18, for God's sake!!
      Exactly: Far too old to infantilize by saying he's too immature to be responsible for his own actions.

      That being said a 38 year sentence would be extreme and unjust. Fortunately, that's just hype as mentioned by others if he's found guilty he'll face concurrent sentencing resulting in a sentence equal to the single most serious crime, not even taking into account the possibility that that sentence will itself be mitigated to a lesser charge.

    33. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by kripkenstein · · Score: 2, Informative

      The pendulum's swung, and we have to get some sanity back into sentencing.

      No sentencing has taken place as of yet.

      56 is the theoretical maximum, if all charges are upheld and if they are consecutive. Neither is likely. It's far more probable that in the end he will be convicted of only part of the 69 offenses, and that the sentences will run concurrently, in other words he'll face a few years in jail.
    34. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's amazing how they can turn a talented, although with obvious problems kid, into an outwright criminal. He is 18, for God's sake!!

      Cop #1 "Man, this 18-year old kid just murdered him in cold blood!"


      Cop #2: "Yeah, but did you see his shot placement? Took him down at 25 yards with a 1" spread. Gotta admit, he's talented!"


      Cop #1: "Yeah, they shouldn't put someone so talented away. He is 18, for God's sake!!"


      Nuff said? Crime is crime. He's an outright criminal because he committed a crime. Wake up.

    35. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by parcel · · Score: 1

      I would much rather that he applied himself to do well in school and set a good example of what good behavior, studying, and hard work can do when working with the grain, not against it. This country was created by the actions of those going against the grain.
    36. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      Actually, if what has been said about him in other posts in this thread, having him secure all those computers would also add up to 38 years.
      But it would be poetic justice, so I'd be okay with that.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    37. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by libkarl2 · · Score: 1

      make an example of him "Examples" scare only those who lack the temerity to do it in the first place.
      --
      You are where you are at the time you are there.
    38. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 5, Funny

      Jail time is not the solution for everything.

      Of course it isn't. Unfortunately, we've outlawed all the fun stuff as "cruel and unusual punishment".

    39. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A school is a place of learning. If this kid was more capable than the teachers in the school (which is very likely) then they should have let him pass with A's on principle.

      So if he's l33t at pwning n00bs, he should get an A in English Composition and Economics?

    40. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by CyberKnet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A lot of us were talented kids, even with obvious problems. We didn't all go and do illegal things, did we?

      Being talented is not a "get out of jail free" card. The law should apply evenly to the talented, and the untalented.

      If anything, being talented would infer more likely intent, and aggravate the charges. After all, he's talented, so he should have known better.

      --
      Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
    41. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by IorDMUX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now, IANAL, but my father is the Asst. County Prosecutor, and I have to tell you that the "38 years" quoted in the article is probably calculated by summing the maximum possible penalties for all of the charges, and then assuming that he's an idiot in prison, too, and never recieves parole or other sympathies.
       
      First off, he likely will not be charged with every single charge and given the maximum penalty and be forced to serve sentences consecutively. Remember that a judge still makes the final sentencing decisions, and is likely to take into account the fact that he is only 18, just leaving high school, etc.
       
      If he even shows a bit of remorse, he'll likely get more community service time than jail time, anyways. (Which is probably to both his and the taxpayers' advantage.)

      --
      >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
    42. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by NormalVisual · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On a more abstract level, it also showed that he felt there was no problem flouting the rules under which society operates under for his own benefit. It's one thing to take a principled stand against those rules you disagree with, but it's quite another to exhibit behavior more associated with the common criminal element just so you can get something for yourself.

      The kid won't get any time behind bars, but he *does* need some. Not because the actual crime he committed was of great import, but because letting him get away with it without any substantial penalty will encourage him on to bigger and better things. This is the kind of guy that becomes Ken Lay or Bernie Ebbers.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    43. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by canajin56 · · Score: 2, Funny

      They could have been more harsh. They could have charged him with a felony count of altering public records, unauthorized access, fraud, and altering official records for every key he pressed. Then a felony count each of theft of property, theft of records, and receiving stolen property, for every pixel he saw, plus felony AND civil copyright infringement. Plus they could have charged him with fraud and identity theft for each key pressed, since each key pressed was done so under the fraudulent identity of the person who's password he logged. Add all those up and you get a trillion dollar fine and a billion years in prison. They were being merciful by only charging him with 3 counts of altering records and 2 counts of theft for every person's grades he altered, and only 4 counts of identity theft!

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    44. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      it also takes real/strength... talent and strength to, for example
      - pummel people to death
      - con people into giving you their money
      - make fake bills, paintings
      - ...

      should we reward that, too ?

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    45. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by NormalVisual · · Score: 2, Informative

      Beyond punitive retribution for wrongs committed, there needs to be some kind of constructive correction.

      But first there needs to actually be a trial. This kid will almost certainly only get probation when all is said and done.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    46. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he doeas deserve an ass kicking, but punishment should be fitting.

      I'm sure it will be, and it won't be anything even within sight of 38 years in prison. There's not even been a trial yet.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    47. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by yakiimo · · Score: 1

      I agree with you mostly except I would add something to the last part about applying himself in school. I actually think it would be better to meet in the middle there.

      If we had an education system that provided for other areas of learning such as what he was doing by himself already (along with some broad based study), that would amplify his natural interests and probably be much more productive for everyone involved than what is available to him.

    48. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by langelgjm · · Score: 1

      As several others have pointed out, the number 38 is probably the maximum he'd face if he were convicted on all charges, got the maximum sentences, and served the sequentially, which will not happen. Also, he has not even been sentenced yet.

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    49. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Capitalist+Piggy · · Score: 1

      It's amazing how they can turn a talented, although with obvious problems kid, into an outwright criminal. He is 18, for God's sake!!

      Wow, I mean, wow. It takes no talent to install a keylogger on a Windows box. You go to google, type "Keylogger XP", download, and run setup.exe.


      If he had actually done something beyond running pre-built tools, such as, write even some simple code to get around security measures, then perhaps-- But there's nothing brilliant about double-clicking on an icon.

    50. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we pretend he was actually a hacker instead of just a script-kiddie, there are actual "with the grain" (though I'd call them under the grain myself) for the skills he would have hypothetically trained himself in, particularly in this whole "war on abstract-concepts" phase we've been in for the past 30 years where the government is largely exempt from the law.

      Beyond that it's patently absurd to pretend that the law is the arbiter of right and wrong, as it precludes the possibility of the law being wrong, which would strip all value from all of the mechanisms in place to change or overturn the law.

      Something being illegal doesn't actually mean that that something is detrimental to society, it just means it's illegal. Morality and legality are distinct entities which sometimes overlap and sometimes contradict eachother, and personally I'd rather that people lived their lives under the edict of helping or at least making a point not to harm others than simply living by the law, which allows you to screw people over arbitrarily if you know well enough how to work the system.

      That said, the real case here is that all we have is a douchebag script-kiddie who is willing to screw other people over for personal gain, and not a terribly clever one at that. 38 years is absurd, but it won't happen and I have no sympathy for him with regard to the penalties he will end up facing. I'm more concerned that they won't be severe enough than anything else.

    51. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would we want to do that. Private prisons are one of the few growing industries in this country.

    52. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by stainlesssteelpat · · Score: 0

      I realise that the trial is but a blip on the horizon. However, given the fact that he's getting slapped with 60 odd charges, even if he gets nailed for only a couple, done concurrently, don't you feel that he's going to come out the back end of the penal system sore, hardened and career? What comes out will be far more threatening than what went in, wouldn't you agree?

      --
      War is the statesman's game, the priest's delight, the lawyer's jest, the hired assassin's trade.- Shelley
    53. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by wellingj · · Score: 1

      I think you should re-read your self defense law. You have to be imminently threatened by bodily harm in order to legally shoot a person in self defense. Presenting your gun in a threating matter would probably be ok (unless you live in DC) if someone was breaking in, but pulling the trigger just because they are standing there would not be.

    54. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by sumdumass · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hey now, lets not let "facts" and "what typically happens" run into our outrage here. Clear and level minded thinking like yours has no place in this discussion. after all, we are trying to build outrage in order to get public sympathy behind him so he will get off with a slap in the wrist.

      So leave your rash and insightful comments out of this...

      BTW, you probably should define the differences between concurrent and consecutive sentencing. It's possible that he could be convicted and sentenced to all 38 years of punishment and serve them all in the time of the longest charge. If the longest penalty for any given charge is 5 years, then his 38 year sentencing could be over completely in 5 years.

    55. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the goddamn story.

      He's not a talented kid. He's a stupid script kiddie that broke into the school and installed spyware -- not even of his own making.

    56. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Britz · · Score: 1

      38 years is maximum prison time. That means most likely he won't get the full sentence.

      That said, I am not American and I really don't get that at all:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisons_in_the_United_States#Incarceration_rate
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisons_in_the_United_States#Comparison_with_other_countries

      Where I come from the maximum for those charges would be up to two or maybe three years. And he wouldn't be in jail awaiting his trial. There are some parts about American culture that I like and some parts that I don't like. This part is one that keeps me thinking if it is even save to visit the US of A (again).

    57. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PATRIOT Act thanks you

    58. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't make our judicial system look ridiculous.

      You see, he is what they call a repeat offender of multiple crimes. It he broke just one of the laws, the punishment would have been just. But he compounded that by repeating his crimes on separate occasion and entering into newer crimes in the process.

      Lets say the penalty for defrauding a person is one year in prison, is it fair to charge a person for each time the committed fraud? Or do we need to forget about the other four victims and leave him with just a year sentencing? Now what if he forged government documents and impersonating a police officer to commit the fraud and both of those are illegal? Should he be charged with any of those crimes too?

      Now suppose that you charged him with only one count and he get off of that count but the evidence is stronger in the other counts? Do you not go after him for those other counts or do you continue until each and every count against him has been acquitted. Now what happens when he runs out of money and can't provide a defese for the consecutive charges and ends up losing because of that. Is he guilty because he did something wrong or because he couldn't pay for a defense?

      Tacking up all the charges and trying them at once gets around the undue expense of consecutive defenses and allows every charge to be dealt with at one time. But because the possibility is there that all the charges add up to 38 year, it doesn't mean that is what he would get. It just means that is what he is charged with. It could be possible that he beats some of the charges and perhaps only has 20 years hanging over his head. Unless there is a mandatory sentencing for one of the crimes, it is possible that he could get as little as community service or probation for them. And even if he was convicted of all counts and sentenced to 38 years, if they a aren't specifically sentenced as consecutive, they will be served concurrently which means he would only serve the maximum time for charge with the largest number of years. If that charge is 5 years, then he could have all 38 years served in those 5 years.

      It is more likely that he will get some lean sentence that doesn't remotely resemble 38 actual years.

    59. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      The problem is that he had to break the law and commit crimes to game the system. Everything in life operates under the assumption that "whoever" is acting in a lawful way. When you goto the store, you trust that your not buying stolen goods because have the right to assume a person acting in an obvious and normal manor isn't breaking the law. When you buy insurance or pay someone to wash your car, you have the right to assume they aren't defrauding you or stealing your car because that is unlawful.

      This is the basic premise behind everything in society. You can walk down the street without fear of dieing because murder is illegal. And when someone breaks that trust, they need to be punished.

    60. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      Most certainly there will be little or no jail time; as a non-violent first-offending teenager with rich parents, he's pretty safe there. The law-and-order response of "the law was broken so his life is over" just seemed inappropriate.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    61. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point. Most people do realize that he's very unlikely to actually serve 38 years in prison. We also realize that most criminals, whatever the crime, serve much less than the maximum possible sentence. What's outrageous here is that even the maximum sentence for what he did is that long.

      I often hear people defending bad law by saying, "Oh, it's never going to be that bad in practice." Which is (a) naive, since very often it is that bad somewhere, for someone, and (b) a fundamental misunderstanding of the problem.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    62. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      There are levels of criminality. A shoplifter is not equivalent to a bank robber. A bar brawler is not equivalent to a mass murderer. A dumbass kid who hacks into his school computer is not equivalent to someone running an identity theft ring.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    63. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      No, I wouldn't. Don't forget that among the computer-related charges he's also being charged with stealing a key and breaking into the school after hours, so he's already demonstrated a clear criminal/sociopathic trend towards doing whatever he wants in furtherance of his own goals, laws and society be damned. That needs to be broken quickly and some respect for the consequences of such behavior instilled.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    64. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      or George Washington.

      Authority is not always right.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    65. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read into it, you'll find that he isn't really talented at all, he's just a lazy, dishonest moron, and he's not going to get much if any jailtime.

      He's already a criminal. He is not a violent one, but it is very doubtful his sentence is going to put him into a position to become a violent criminal. Now, what he's done to his future with this nonsense might do that.

      Despite popular ideas to the contrary, not everyone, or even most people who do things like this, are "geniuses". At best, some are fairly clever, and this guy isn't one of those. All he has is a lack of morals and enough resolve to do something like this, which does seperate him from other dishonest lazy morons.

    66. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Which is why I said "It's one thing to take a principled stand against those rules you disagree with" in the original post. This kid isn't an idealistic rebel fighting against that which he feels is wrong, he's simply a lazy bum trying to get something for nothing.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    67. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Gaian-Orlanthii · · Score: 1

      The Matrix has you.

    68. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      I think you should re-read your self defense law. You have to be imminently threatened by bodily harm in order to legally shoot a person in self defense. Presenting your gun in a threating matter would probably be ok (unless you live in DC) if someone was breaking in, but pulling the trigger just because they are standing there would not be.

      Can you say "Castle Doctrine"? Sure you can. Try it, boys and girls.

      The Castle Doctrine is law in some states, and basically gives blanket immunity from prosecution is you do bad things to someone who has entered your house without your permission.

      In addition, in most of the remaining states, if you shoot someone who has broken into your house, you'll be prosecuted if the DA is running for reelection, then acquitted as a matter of course.

      Yes, there are a few states where you aren't allowed to defend yourself until it's too late to successfully do so. But not so many as you might think.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    69. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good Lord you must be a boring person.

    70. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      Wake up! Jail time for changing grades, man. Snap out of it.

      No, jail time for breaking & entering (burglary) to commit fraud. Repeatedly.

      Jail time is not the solution for everything.

      I certainly agree. In the case of breaking and entering to commit fraud, however, I think it might not be a bad thing.

      He's not going to get 38 years, probably won't get more than 1-2, and I think that is entirely appropriate for something like burglary combined with the other stuff he did. I'm not in favor of absurd penalties, but when your cunning plan involves breaking into a building that you are not authorized to enter, yeah, I'd say you need to learn a lesson in the responsible use of your freedoms, and one that can be well taught by temporarily removing those freedoms.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    71. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      I don't know. If you are willing to break into the school's system to improve your grades, and generally compromise their data, I am not sure it is _they_ turning you into a criminal. I think, if you do that, _you_ are already over the line.

      Bingo! If the need to break into a building to pull off your plan doesn't deter you, then I'd say that you're already well on the road to criminality.

      Perhaps, if he were, I don't know, 5 years old or mentally retarded, then I could understand him not knowing the difference between right and wrong. However, I'm pretty sure that in this case he knew what he was doing was wrong and simply didn't care. Perhaps the temporary removal of his freedoms will teach him to use his freedoms more wisely.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    72. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      The problem is that he had to break the law and commit crimes to game the system. No, the problem is (lawyers) expecting computers to work like the physical world.


      It is reasonable to expect people in the real world to behave lawfully because they tend to leave a lot of evidence behind when they do commit a crime, which makes detection feasible and it is unreasonable to fully secure 'the world' against unlawful actions because 'the world' is essentially an open system with infinite inputs and outputs.

      However, a computer system can be made secure because there is only a limited set of attacks (the data in the computer is the only target that matters) so you only need defend against two categories of attack - data copying and data modification and all the variables and inputs and outputs are limited to only what's part of the computer system itself.

      Sure it will cost something to completely defend against those two types of attacks, but its still a well defined and limited problem. It seems to me that if the punishment for succeeding with one of those attacks is 38 years of a person's life, then the value of the data is pretty high and thus properly securing it is worth the cost.

      You can walk down the street without fear of dieing because murder is illegal. And when someone breaks that trust, they need to be punished. You are actually supporting my argument - killing someone in the street tends to leave a lot of evidence around - witnesses, physical evidence, etc, so deterrence is high because chances are they will be caught after the fact if not sooner. Similarly. it's impossible to 100% secure against getting killed in the street, the street is an open system with an infinite number of variables. So, short of just not using the street, it is infeasible to secure yourself against all possibles methods of being killed there so it is a risk we have no choice but to accept.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    73. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's outrageous here is that even the maximum sentence for what he did is that long.
      No it's not. He committed crimes over and over and over. When you commit 50+ crimes you face a very long potential sentence. There's no way a judge would make the consecutive.
    74. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      we are trying to build outrage in order to get public sympathy behind him so he will get off with a slap in the wrist.

      I'm not sympathetic to him. He (allegedly) did something wrong and deserves a fair punishment. However, he didn't do 38 years wrong - not even a hypothetical, unlikely 38 years. The fact that he's even potentially facing that stretch is a travesty, if for no other reason than that it gives prosecutors an enormous freakin' bargaining stick. "Play it nice and confess, kid, and we'll let you out in just 8. This is the only shot you'll get before we get crazy on you." If he had a maximum 4 year sentence dangling over his head, perhaps he'd fight it rather than take a crappy deal.

      Again, I'm not a soft-on-crime person. It's just that I think something's severely broken if this is even a possibility, however remote.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    75. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by shiftless · · Score: 1

      If the longest penalty for any given charge is 5 years, then his 38 year sentencing could be over completely in 5 years.

      Do you have any idea how destructive 5 years in prison would be to this young man? His life will basically be ruined. All because he made some stupid teenage decisions.

    76. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by shiftless · · Score: 1

      He's not talented, he's a sociopath. He should be expelled from school and they should staple a copy of the police report to any transcript they send to a college.

      Exactly. Let's send him to prison for years and destroy his life because we don't like certain aspects of his personality (sociopathy.) Then when he has spent years in prison hanging out with rapists, murderers, etc, and becomes indoctrinated into that culture, we'll all be much better off, right? I hope the kid gets out of prison and murders ever single one of the cocksuckers who sent him there.

    77. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I AM going to argue about his talent, and say he is just as talented as a common thief: installing keyloggers doesn't require particularly high levels of talent.

      Also, from what I know of hacker mentality, the motivation to hack lies in the challenge of an exploit; when this kid's "exploits" consist of using keyloggers and stealing passwords for his own gain, I'd hardly place him in the same category as hackers.

    78. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by themushroom · · Score: 1

      Funny how murders, rapists, and other actual crimes and criminals get less of a sentence than this.

      The 38 years is cumulative and probably won't be what actually gets doled out, but still... Sad that demonstrating a little computer prowess to tweak grades sounds like it gets a worse sentence than hurting someone else.

    79. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      If he committed the crimes singularly and only faced one at a time, the sentences would be just. But all lumped together, it adds up. However, he is simply charged at this point (I think they actually charged him). His lawyer is certain to get some of them dropped, and as for the 4 years, if that is the maximum sentencing for one count, then he will likely be charged with that.

      You see, what the GP was attempting to say is that legally, when he is convicted, each counts sentence runs at the same time. This 38 years could be as short as 4 years if he was serving 11 sentences at once. Unless something requires consecutive sentencing, that would happen. The entire 38 years at this point in time is nothing but hyperbole attempting to get you riled up. The way thing were stated in the summery and article is not how things work in real life.

      Your outrage doesn't make you soft on crime but it does make you a little naive about the criminal justice system. I would think that is a good thing because I got some of my knowledge of the subjects as a participant.

    80. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by mxs · · Score: 1

      Where's the "talent?" The only thing he did was read someone's password to initially "hack" the system, and I'll bet $20 that the "remote access program" was something he downloaded from some site with a name like "Teh Supar-3v1L Bl4ck Haxx0rZ La1r!" Giving him a pass because it's a nonviolent crime makes as much sense as letting off anybody who tunnels into a bank because they were clever. He's not talented, he's a sociopath. He should be expelled from school and they should staple a copy of the police report to any transcript they send to a college. You seem to know an awful lot about this guy, have met him personally, and can pass judgement on his persona without blinking an eye. You have also never done something stupid while you were young, never knew anybody who did anything stupid while they were young and grew up to be upstanding citizens, and have always had a fully developed sense of right and wrong. It's almost as if I know you, right ?
    81. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by mxs · · Score: 1

      If he is guilty of those charges, he is a criminal. Well, duh. But is he a kid-stealing-a-candybar-criminal, or a I-just-raped-and-murdered-your-wife-criminal ? The former is a stupid youthful mistake that can usually be straightened out by a parent and maybe some community service. The latter really isn't.

      Those actions undermine society's trust in the system that if someone graduates from an institution and that institution certifies that the student did what the records say they did, they may or may not be qualified for jobs, further education, etc. AND RIGHTFULLY SO.

      I put that in caps because it is important.

      Society's trust in those records is misplaced if they are trivial to alter electronically. In this case he got caught, good thing. Question is, how many such cases slip by ? If the number is nonzero, then the trust is misplaced.

      While 38 years is certainly harsh, that is criminal behavior. There should be punishment, no doubt. Putting the guy into a jail for most of his adult life is cruel, unusual, and unwarranted.

      Our education system is far from perfect but guys like this certainly do not help make it better. And guys like this are not SUPPOSED to help make it better. They are the ones that should get educated by the system. It's not their responsibility to make it better. Sure, it helps if the students are all nice and pretty and have no problems whatsoever in any area of their life, but they do. And the education system does its part to help those students get better. Or it should.

      I would much rather that he applied himself to do well in school and set a good example of what good behavior, studying, and hard work can do when working with the grain, not against it. Good for you. So are you saying that any and all "problem kid" should be expelled from school at the earliest opportunity ? That's the ultimate resolution of this problem ... You don't want to work with the grain ? Fine. There's the highway.

    82. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 1

      I'll ignore your embarrassing, frothing outrage, because I realize that I never got around to saying that I actually don't think he deserves prison. Jail? Probably, for a bit. Community service? Tons. And I'll stand by my point that no university should let him in without knowing what he did. Letting him sail into college without facing the consequences of such egregious academic conduct is spitting in the face of everyone who ever, y'know, studied.

      And the fact that you think I should be murdered for saying that a serial criminal should at least be charged with his crimes is amusing, to say the least.

    83. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by AgentFade2Black · · Score: 1

      They won't have to staple anything. If he is smart, and brings truth to his college apps, he must report any felony convictions on his application.

    84. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 1

      Actually, I did a lot of stupid stuff when I was young. And I got away with it. Over and over, until I finally found myself in front of a judge facing felony charges. If someone had held me accountable when I first showed myself to be a colossal fuckup, then maybe it wouldn't have led to me facing serious criminal charges that could have had me facing serious time. Twenty years later and much wiser, I wish someone had beat my ass the first time I pulled something that I skated away from because it was non-violent and "hey, he's just young and did something stupid."

      So please pardon me if I say that yes, I think I do know an awful lot about this guy and am going to judge the hell out of him.

    85. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      But he won't do it again will he?

      The system works.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    86. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by k3r3nsky'sr3v3ng3 · · Score: 1

      Its also amazing how grades, "earned" or not in a boring ass classroom can make a difference of tens of thousands of dollars. Amazing world we have here eh?

      --
      "We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security." Dwight Eisenhower
    87. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Almost everyone who breaks a law made a stupid decision. Just the other day, two teens where drag racing daddies car and struck and killed a pedestrian. Should they go off scott free too?

      Society expects people to be responsible for their actions. This isn't the result of careless ineptness but the results of carefully calculated and planned actions. The boy deserves something but the problem is, as of now, he hasn't even been convicted. So talking about some potential sentence as if it happened isn't really pertinent at the moment. Five years may be too much, that is up to the judge to determine if he is convicted.

    88. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by mathnerd314 · · Score: 1

      Add all those up and you get a trillion dollar fine ...MPAA style!
      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
    89. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Binder · · Score: 1

      Talent is not required for this sort of thing. Most schools computers are so poorly protected that anyone who tried could gain access to them relatively easily.

      And remember... you only catch the stupid criminals.

    90. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by k3r3nsky'sr3v3ng3 · · Score: 1

      he certainly showed no compassion for those whom he hurt. ( the other scholarship applicants). Although I'd say just revoke his chances at a scholarship and make him do some community service; mabye add some community service for good measure.

      --
      "We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security." Dwight Eisenhower
    91. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      No, the problem is (lawyers) expecting computers to work like the physical world.
      For the most part, they do. You see, no trespassing means no trespassing.

      It is reasonable to expect people in the real world to behave lawfully because they tend to leave a lot of evidence behind when they do commit a crime, which makes detection feasible and it is unreasonable to fully secure 'the world' against unlawful actions because 'the world' is essentially an open system with infinite inputs and outputs.
      Sure.. And when you cannot secure it, you have laws giving you a reasonable assurance of protection. Why, because people aren't supposed to break laws and are supposed to be punished when they do. When that doesn't happen, it doesn't mean that we ignore the system, it means we work on fixing it and catching the criminals.

      However, a computer system can be made secure because there is only a limited set of attacks (the data in the computer is the only target that matters) so you only need defend against two categories of attack - data copying and data modification and all the variables and inputs and outputs are limited to only what's part of the computer system itself.
      He got physical access to the machines. Once that happens, any protections in place can be defeated. It isn't a simple concept but one that is too often true. He ended up getting a login name and password somehow and done his deeds. But that isn't all, he physically broke into the school and stole a test. It isn't like he hacked the system and defeated security measures that weren't there. The computer has to be functional to be valuable and you can't have both and be secure when someone has physical access.

      Sure it will cost something to completely defend against those two types of attacks, but its still a well defined and limited problem. It seems to me that if the punishment for succeeding with one of those attacks is 38 years of a person's life, then the value of the data is pretty high and thus properly securing it is worth the cost.
      The problem is, there wasn't really an attack that you can defend from. He had physical access to the systems and a valid login that he swiped from someone. As far as the system is concerned, he was a valid user.

      You are actually supporting my argument - killing someone in the street tends to leave a lot of evidence around - witnesses, physical evidence, etc, so deterrence is high because chances are they will be caught after the fact if not sooner. Similarly. it's impossible to 100% secure against getting killed in the street, the street is an open system with an infinite number of variables. So, short of just not using the street, it is infeasible to secure yourself against all possibles methods of being killed there so it is a risk we have no choice but to accept.
      And your missing my point. You don't fear it because it is illegal. People don't kill people. It doesn't matter how much evidence is left around, there is a law against those actions and people don't generally break the law. Most people who break the law do don't think they will leave evidence or that they will get caught, does that make them ok because they thought they could get away with it? Of course not. But your failure to deadbolt your house is not an open invitation for me to go in and take things that aren't mine. It doesn't absolve me from any criminal liability. Similarly, it doesn't absolve this kid of what he did. It doesn't matter what he claims was open or unlocked, he knows because of the law that it was illegal. You can't really look at it any differently.
    92. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      For the most part, they do. You see, no trespassing means no trespassing. Please don't tell me you are one of those lawyers you thinks the law of man trumps the laws of physics.

      Sure.. And when you cannot secure it And the point here is that you CAN secure it. It is feasible to secure computer systems. Whereas it is not feasible to secure everyone against being killed in the street.

      He got physical access to the machines. Once that happens, any protections in place can be defeated. That's not what the article says. Nor is that necessarily true - physical access to a computer does not yield keys used to encrypt data on the computer.

      It doesn't matter how much evidence is left around, there is a law against those actions and people don't generally break the law. No, people break the law ALL THE TIME. The harder to enforce, the less meaningful a law is. Laws regarding computer crimes are almost impossible to enforce. But, computers do have the benefit of being much easier to secure than the real world. Its two sides of the same coin - you can pass all the laws you want against computer crime, but they will not be a deterrent precisely because a poorly secured system can be so easily compromised.

      But your failure to deadbolt your house is not an open invitation for me to go in and take things that aren't mine. It doesn't absolve me from any criminal liability. No, but your failure to deadbolt your house DOES increase YOUR liability for the events that follow. Furthermore, just because the law prescribes certain penalties does not mean they are just or reasonable. For example, if the death penalty were mandatory for breaking and entering an unsecured home, you break in well then you deserve the death penalty. Not.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    93. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by mxs · · Score: 1

      So please pardon me if I say that yes, I think I do know an awful lot about this guy and am going to judge the hell out of him. No, I will not. The world is not about you. You still have no idea whatsoever who that guy is.

      Nowhere did I advocate not punishing him or that there should be no consequences; however, consequences that ruin the rest of your life for a stupid mistake are not the answer. For all YOU know, this is the first run-in with this kind of stuff this guy had.

    94. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Wake up! Jail time for changing grades, man. Snap out of it."

      What would you be saying if you lost a medical school scholarship to someone who altered grades?
      Grade alteration is essentially forgery.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    95. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Please don't tell me you are one of those lawyers you thinks the law of man trumps the laws of physics.

      No, I am one of those people who thinks the law of man rules the law of man, even when physics makes it difficult to get caught.

      And the point here is that you CAN secure it. It is feasible to secure computer systems. Whereas it is not feasible to secure everyone against being killed in the street.

      OK, so even if you can secure it against physical access with a stolen login that nobody knows you are using, what part of not doing so absolves anyone from actions they take in violation of a law? You see, it doesn't not matter, if an effort was made and someone bypassed that effort, they are fully aware that they are breaking a law when attacking it in whatever way. It doesn't matter how easy it might be, when you defeat any type of security, you lose any defense of I didn't know. The fact that it was there, like a lock on the door that you can bypass by breaking the glass out, means that you knew someone was attempting to restrict your access.

      That's not what the article says. Nor is that necessarily true - physical access to a computer does not yield keys used to encrypt data on the computer.

      I'm not sure what article you read, but the one linked in the summery said he stole a log in and use it to access the systems. Now when a workstation logs into an MS domain controller with roaming profiles, that is for all intents and purposed physical access even if he didn't touch the server. He wasn't cyphering keys or anything of the sorts. This was an over the shoulder hack, not a I'm smarter then you hack.

      No, people break the law ALL THE TIME. The harder to enforce, the less meaningful a law is. Laws regarding computer crimes are almost impossible to enforce. But, computers do have the benefit of being much easier to secure than the real world. Its two sides of the same coin - you can pass all the laws you want against computer crime, but they will not be a deterrent precisely because a poorly secured system can be so easily compromised.

      When you speed, you can get a ticket. It is probably true that more people speed then those who get a ticket but there is a law with consequences for those actions. When you get caught, you can be punished according to the law. The chances of getting away with it have no bearing on whether or not there is a penalty for breaking the law.

      I'm not advocating using law instead of security measures. In fact, you would have to use a certain amount of securing in order to show a line of what acceptable access was and wasn't. But I have no problems with prosecuting someone when they break the law.

      No, but your failure to deadbolt your house DOES increase YOUR liability for the events that follow. Furthermore, just because the law prescribes certain penalties does not mean they are just or reasonable. For example, if the death penalty were mandatory for breaking and entering an unsecured home, you break in well then you deserve the death penalty. Not.

      If you leave your keys in the car and somebody takes it, it is joy riding. If you don't and it is taken, it is theft. But if you don't intend on returning the vehicle to the lawful owners, the joy ridding becomes theft.

      Just the same, a law is sort of a contract. When you violate a law, you are excepting that the maximum penalties could be applied to you. While I think capitol punishment for entering an unlocked home is somewhat harsh, someone who knew that was the possibility before taking a specific action to violate the law has basically agreed to accept the penalties if they get caught. Nobody forced them to break the law, they did it on their own merits. Likewise, when the options are cheat risk imprisonment verses doing the work, and you choose the option with penalties, you made that choice and need to stick b

    96. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

      Don't confuse the topic with things that did not occur in this case. My comment pertains to the specifics of this case, in which he was quickly discovered and did not reap such benefits. In just about every court system in the world, punishment is weighed against severity of the gain or loss due to theft or forgery. You know that, so adding a hypothetical condition obviously alters what sort of punishment would be appropriate. Had he profited by accepting $50,000 in ill-gotten scholarships, jail-time would be appropriate. In USA, it would have been grand larceny.

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    97. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Mod parent's sig up.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    98. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Add all those up and you get a trillion dollar fine and a billion years in prison.
      Plus if it was in the UK you could releae him on appeal after a billion years but charge him (or his descendants) for board and lodging over that period.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    99. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That law is not hard to cope with. The prosecutor can just let him choose between 38 years in prison or a cruel and unusual punishment. When he chooses it himself, it is not cruel anymore, is it?

    100. Re:Jail time, that will teach him by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Not that I'm one for putting people in jail... But his crimes are 'light' and in no way will place him in prison with rapists or murders in most of the US... Frankly I think we are to light on criminals and prison is usually lighter than some other punishments (your given middle class housing level facilities including sat or cable tv, nice meals, fitness centers, etc with effectively maid service... Your cost only is being in a cell for part of your day and not being able to leave the building in most cases... Poor people from the city I work in want to commit crimes to live life easy like that!

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
  8. What happened to common sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sure the kid is an idiot, but does he deserve 38 years? That's insane.

    Kick him out of school. Hold him back a year. Put him to work in community service.

    People who think he deserves 38 years in prison for being a teenage idiot probably deserve to be in prison themselves.

    1. Re:What happened to common sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more a case of the sentancing for the number of crimes adding up. They probably could push for a more lenient sentance, but they're probably embarrassed that their security is so poor that some "teenage idiot" could break in to their school computer system. It's a little like how a string of petty burglaries can easily net you far more prison time than a one-off murder.

    2. Re:What happened to common sense? by maxume · · Score: 1

      It hasn't been decided that he is going to spend 38 years in prison just yet.

      It wouldn't be shocking if he spends 10 though.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:What happened to common sense? by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      38 years? 10? What's the "correct" number?

      Remember that these numbers are thrown about by people who wouldn't want to spend a SINGLE NIGHT in prison.

      Yes there must be consequences for his actions. But YEARS in jail? This kid isn't really a "threat" to society or someone who needs to be, what's the word they like to use now? - rehabilitated... It's just a dumb kid who needs to be taught a lesson. 38 years, or 10, or even 1 will probably break him and ensure that society gains yet another underachieving, useless supermarket bagger (if that).

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:What happened to common sense? by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know, the B&E charge shows quite a lack of judgment. If he'll break into a school to fix his grades, it is likely that he'll embezzle without hesitation, lie, cheat, steal, etc. each and every time that he thinks he can get away with it.

      I'm all for making the penal system as improvement based as possible (after all, taking care of someone is expensive, and 'hardening' them is a poor outcome), but the news on the ground shows that there also needs to be a deterrent aspect (large numbers of people consistently act in a manner that shows no regard for society or others).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:What happened to common sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yeah whatever happened to common sense? I mean he just changed a grade right? And a little breaking and entering and stealing as well. Not a big deal. No one got hurt.

      Down the road if he decides to falsify some information it won't really matter much will it? Maybe just cut and paste some analysis results so it looks like he did all the required tests. I mean come on? Those tomatoes likely don't have any salmonella bacteria on them. It'll be fine. Those toys? No lead in them. That pet food form China? Good stuff.

      So what if he thinks he deserves more than he's paid? What's a little embezzlement. No one will miss a hundred thousand here, a hundred thousand there.

      What ever happened to common sense?

    6. Re:What happened to common sense? by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1

      He hasn't hurt anyone, his "crime" has no victims other than himself. But of course he'll face jail-time. Prison is the state's way of reminding the people who's boss.

      --
      He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
    7. Re:What happened to common sense? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      You can kill people and get less time in jail then that.

      But god forbid a politician looks like he is "soft on crime".

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    8. Re:What happened to common sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      38 years is really harsh...

      A 18yr old kid killed a 11 yr old in a reckless driving incident... he got 1 year in prison and 5 years on probation... yet hacking will get you more than that?... c'mon.

    9. Re:What happened to common sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      38 years is the total of all the maximum sentences he could receive for all of the crimes he's charged with. There's been no trial, so he's not been convicted of anything yet. If and when he is convicted, unless there are mandatory sentencing guidelines in play, there's nothing that says the court will give him anything close to the maximum sentence for any of the charges. The headline is sensationalist drivel that has only a passing resemblence to reality, but a lot of people apparently are just lapping it up and expressing outrage that isn't based on anything real.

      It's quite disturbing to see so many people here on Slashdot that one would take to be quite intelligent by virtue of most of the subject matter here, but who are so painfully deficient in being able to put that which they read into its proper context. Propaganda is *designed* for people like that.

    10. Re:What happened to common sense? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
      kid isn't really a "threat" to society or someone who needs to be, what's the word they like to use now? - rehabilitated... It's just a dumb kid who needs to be taught a lesson.

      Sure, maybe now. Or, perhaps he's someone who has no respect for others or their property, and/or only cares about himself. Perhaps he's just a dumb kid, or perhaps he'd grow up into an Enron exec, a Bear Stearns account rep, or worse...

      Besides, the summary of charges are to ensure they will convict him of *something* and gives a little wiggle room for negotiations.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    11. Re:What happened to common sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok people, seriously... start complaining AFTER he gets sentenced. That is just the max term he might possibly serve due to the indictments. They list them all, doesn't mean he will get max for it! I bet he gets a little jail time for fun, then EXTENSIVE public service, revoking of computer privileges, etc.

    12. Re:What happened to common sense? by evil_aar0n · · Score: 1

      > useless supermarket bagger

      I _was_ a supermarket bagger, at one point, you insensitive clod.

      --
      Truth, Justice. Or the American Way.
    13. Re:What happened to common sense? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Down the road if he decides to falsify some information it won't really matter much will it? Maybe just cut and paste some analysis results so it looks like he did all the required tests. I mean come on? Those tomatoes likely don't have any salmonella bacteria on them. It'll be fine. Those toys? No lead in them. That pet food form China? Good stuff.

      The idea that we should lock people up because of potential crimes they might commit is an obscenity.

      Yes, he did something bad, and he should be punished for it. But punishing him on the same scale we punish rapists and bank robbers is absurd.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    14. Re:What happened to common sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To play devils advocate, you don't know anything about this kid. He very well may be a threat to society. Than again, he may just be some idiot that wanted to be popular and figured he could change some grades and get some test questions for friends.

      38 Years does sound extreme to say the least, but I keep in mind that I know nothing about this kid other than a few paragraphs of text about what he did -- not who he is. Lastly, is 38 the maximum or his expected served sentence? I'm not familiar with how much a con can expect to get off for good behavior and parole.

    15. Re:What happened to common sense? by cryptoluddite · · Score: 1

      38 years? 10? What's the "correct" number? The "correct" number is one fixing of the system so that people can't "hack" grades by using a keylogger.


      Plus branding this guy on his records as a cheater, plus having him apologize to each of this classmates 'or else'. Oh yeah, and take away his right to hold public office lest the Diebolds declare him president despite not being on the ballot -- we've seen what happens with a cheater in the ovaloffice.org and we can't afford it happening again.

    16. Re:What happened to common sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He isn't a threat to society unless you consider it critical to give every child in America numerical scores for easy ranking. For some reason, people do.

    17. Re:What happened to common sense? by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      If he was failing classes He already is an underachiever. Before I say the punishment is too hard I'll wait to see if its concurrent sentencing or not, and also if that's the actual punishment he gets. A lot of people are facing crazy sentences for crimes that what the sentencing section is for, to provide mitigating circumstances etc.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    18. Re:What happened to common sense? by jamesh · · Score: 1

      How can you say he hasn't hurt anyone?

      Things like this cost money, which the university will now have to find from somewhere else, eg cut backs on staffing? Losing your job hurts.

      If you happen to be a friend of this guy, or just happen to play cards with him occasionally during breaks, and you manage to get straight A's, a suspicious eye will be cast upon you. There might even be an investigation and if the investigation is in any way public, even if it determines that you earned every single one of those A's, it will still hurt.

      I'm sick of 'white collar' crime being under punished. These people ruin lives, and just because they did it with a computer or an elaborate scam instead of with a gun or a baseball bat, it doesn't mean they should get off _that_ much more lightly. It's not like the rules aren't clearly stated.

    19. Re:What happened to common sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense. He is one of these internet terrorists we keep hearing about and this crime was the internet equivalent of 9/11.

      We need to continue teh war on internets terrors. /sarcasm

    20. Re:What happened to common sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, perhaps he's someone who has no respect for others or their property, and/or only cares about himself. And like all people with these attributes he should go where he belongs: into the US government.
    21. Re:What happened to common sense? by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

      About your sig. FWIW I have had Steven Brust cook me dinner - he is better than a good cook. He is also happens to be a most excellent Football referee.

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
    22. Re:What happened to common sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part of the problem is you have to make the punishment hard enough to make sure other don't try to do what he has done. Also, the general rule is that 1 out of 10 get caught. The next question is how hard would it be for him to use those skills on other systems (banks, credit card, Social Security Records, housing records, extra). No one what's that and we don't want to allow him to go and say "well that wasn't bad, I will make sure that the next time I am more careful about tipping people off to what I have done." So, yes the best rule is to keep people in line. 38 years does seem like a lot, 1 doesn't seem like enough. Where is the balance for the crime? Hard to say, we hope that the judge will be able to answer that question.

  9. Kamp Krusty by russoc4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "You know, a D turns into a B so easily. You just got greedy."

  10. They don't know the half of it... by Recovering+Hater · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just wait until they find out what he has done to WOPR.

    --
    My humor is probably your flamebait
    1. Re:They don't know the half of it... by junglee_iitk · · Score: 1

      World of Public Relationscraft?

    2. Re:They don't know the half of it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait until they find out what he has done to WOPR. He added cheese!
    3. Re:They don't know the half of it... by jmauro · · Score: 3, Informative

      So sad, so sad. He means this WOPR. On second thought I feel old.

    4. Re:They don't know the half of it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait until they find out what he has done to WOPR. haha that was good movie!
  11. Correction by poeidon1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    its not Kahn (repeated several times in post) but Khan

    --
    They called me mad, and I called them mad, and damn them, they outvoted me. -Nathaniel Lee
    1. Re:Correction by White+Flame · · Score: 4, Funny

      You mean KHAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNN?

      (additional caps-filter dodging text goes here)

    2. Re:Correction by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

      So this is how it starts. Soon he'll be genetically-enhancing his followers, going into suspended animation and then who knows what else...

    3. Re:Correction by Binkleyz · · Score: 1

      Ok, sorry, can't resist..

      Khaan!!!!

      Khaan!!!!

    4. Re:Correction by asylumx · · Score: 1

      I guess the school faced the Wrath of Khan...

    5. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its not Kahn (repeated several times in post) but KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNN!
       
      Fixed that for you.

    6. Re:Correction by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      I cant believe I had to scroll this far down the comments to see this joke! Shame on you /.

      --
      Balderdash!
  12. What would 38 years in prison achieve? by msgmonkey · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Surely a combination of barring him from ever entering an academic instution again, access to computers, heavy community service, etc etc would be more of an effective punishment then the state feeding, clothing and sheltering this guy for 38 years. I'm not being soft on the guy but it seems like if he had commited a violent crime he would have been looking at less time.

    1. Re:What would 38 years in prison achieve? by Captain+Centropyge · · Score: 1

      Most likely, he won't see much prison time, if any. But asking what good prison does is complete ignorance. Should these crimes be treated without any real threat of punishment? He's 18, and he's obviously smart enough to commit this type of crime. There's no reason to think he shouldn't have known it was illegal, and carried possibly major consequences. After all, it's not like he's the first one to get busted for the same exact thing.

      --
      Bite my shiny metal ass!
    2. Re:What would 38 years in prison achieve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 38 years is most likely prison term if he were to be convicted on all counts and the judge sentenced him to serve consecutive sentences.

      More likely, even if he is convicted on all counts, much of it will be set to be served concurrently.

    3. Re:What would 38 years in prison achieve? by maxume · · Score: 1

      If he mugged 50 people he would probably be facing more time.

      One good thing to do is to wait and see what his actual sentence is before worrying to much about a miscarriage of justice.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:What would 38 years in prison achieve? by Binkleyz · · Score: 1

      Or, I suppose that we could place him into suspended animation and send him (and a few of his hack3r buddies) into space....

      That would certainly keep him from, say, mucking about with his genes and turning himself into some sort of charismatic leader while attempting to take over the world.

    5. Re:What would 38 years in prison achieve? by msgmonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      With all due respect but disregarding what good prison would do this kid as "complete ignorance" is ignorance in itself. The kid is 18, even if he saw just a year of jail time, you mix him up with all kinds of career criminals you end up getting out something worse than what you put in. Or you could belive the incarcaration industry that he will come out a reformed character. Tag him, limit his activities, get him to do community service that gives a net gain instead of the cost of sheltering and feeding from the state.

      I'm not against prison, I just think there are more effective ways of punishing him.

    6. Re:What would 38 years in prison achieve? by Captain+Centropyge · · Score: 1

      I agree. As I posted earlier, I doubt he'll see any prison time. His crime may not warrant prison time, but your comment seemed to imply that consequences for young people should be small, just because of their age. Reading your reply, it seems we're in agreement. Prison time is overkill. But there should definitely be some consequences to remind him to use his noggin next time.

      --
      Bite my shiny metal ass!
    7. Re:What would 38 years in prison achieve? by VampireByte · · Score: 1

      In 38 years his "hacking skills" will be so outdated they are useless.

      --

      Run and catch, run and catch, the lamb is caught in the blackberry patch.

    8. Re:What would 38 years in prison achieve? by greenguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What if they simply sentence him to an additional three years of high school?

      --
      What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
    9. Re:What would 38 years in prison achieve? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Asking what good prison does is always a valid question. There are three good answers:
      1. Deter others from committing the same crime.
      2. Remove a threat from society.
      3. Reform the individual.

      The third can pretty much be discounted, since the reformation aspect of prisons in the USA is a joke. The second might apply, if it seems likely that he is going to go on to abuse other systems. He could potentially cause a great deal of harm to the public by editing tax, banking, or healthcare systems in a similar way. The first reason is much harder, since the deterrent aspect of prison depends a lot on the crime - it only works at all for premeditated crimes where the perpetrator has some expectation of being caught.

      Weighed against this, you have two concerns:

      1. Prison is incredibly expensive.
      2. Prison, as currently implemented, tends to put criminals together in a setting where they have little to do other than learn from each other how to be better criminals.
      The second of these directly contradicts the reform aspect of prisons, which means that putting people in prison and then releasing them later is often a very bad idea. The first of these means that, if the three goals of prison (deterrent, threat removal, and reform) can be achieved in a cheaper way, then prison is probably not the ideal solution. A better punishment might be resetting all of his grades, making him resit the last few years of school until he gets the A grades he obviously wanted, and make him spend his evenings (when not doing homework) securing school computers in the district.
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    10. Re:What would 38 years in prison achieve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the best sentence would be that applied to some career hackers, and far more damaging than time in jail - a temporary but long-term ban on his computer use. As in, you can go to college, but no computers for you until you graduate from college. Make him type his term papers on a TYPEWRITER! he he he!

    11. Re:What would 38 years in prison achieve? by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Meh, just save yourself a sleeper ship and park his ass on Ceti Alpha V right off the bat.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    12. Re:What would 38 years in prison achieve? by rpbird · · Score: 1

      I doubt very much they'll put him in Max. If he gets prison time, and I bet he will get from one to three years, he'll be sent to Minimum or a nice prison farm, to hang out with the savings-and-loan crowd and the check kiters.

    13. Re:What would 38 years in prison achieve? by slamb · · Score: 1

      With all due respect but disregarding what good prison would do this kid as "complete ignorance" is ignorance in itself. The kid is 18, even if he saw just a year of jail time, you mix him up with all kinds of career criminals you end up getting out something worse than what you put in.

      I hope you're saying that because he's somewhat young and the crimes were (presumably) his first and non-violent, not because most were computer crimes (a "clever" white-collar crime many here could identify with). Why not apply the same reasoning to, say, a high school student who commits a string of burglaries/thefts?

    14. Re:What would 38 years in prison achieve? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      I live in Canada, and I just got a letter back from an idiot government MP about prison.

      You see, by sending this kid to jail, we somehow help prevent the crime that he committed.

      That is the "logic" of these people in government who create these policies--ironically, to "protect our children".

      Here, I posted the MP's letter to my blog with commentary here.

      (Claimer: there are no ads on my blog and I make no revenue from traffic)

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    15. Re:What would 38 years in prison achieve? by arstchnca · · Score: 1

      Amen.

      Prison is expensive, personally destructive, and frankly only necessary when an individual's evidenced propensities (such as a history of physical violence) demonstrate that removal from regular society is probably in someone's best interest.

      Like being isolated from the people and places he knows will foster morality.

      --
      -- arstchnca
      --
    16. Re:What would 38 years in prison achieve? by HellYeahAutomaton · · Score: 1

      I think a year in prison, 500 hour community service, and financial damages not to exceed $100,000 would be fair punishment. (Society has already proven that punishment via wallet is a very effective deterrent in the form of taxation for wealth distribution).

      This kid is obviously skilled, and someone will want to snatch him up to work at a security company -- and make sure he is never wearing the bad hat again.

    17. Re:What would 38 years in prison achieve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is an 18 year old a legal adult in his state of residence?

    18. Re:What would 38 years in prison achieve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All he did was white collar crime. He won't be in the "hardcore" felony prisons. He'd go to the male equivalent to camp cupcake or wherever it was that Martha Stewart went.

    19. Re:What would 38 years in prison achieve? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      He doesn't matter except an an example. The point of prison is to deter others and stop the criminal for the time he is locked up. Better if it breaks him so he behaves, but if not he can go back. We all know he isn't going to do 38 years, but a few is a nice reminder to other punks to behave themselves.

      He has proven his worthlessness, and a nice long dose of slammer time can be used as an example to others.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  13. Sensationalist? by youthoftoday · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Forget the post being sensationalist, what about the legal system? What kind of legal system (or university or whoever is bringing the prosecution) pushes for 40 years for this kind of thing? Clearly not one that expects to do any public good...

    --
    -1 not first post
    1. Re:Sensationalist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder what would happen if the 18-yr old son of a white Hollywood star were caught doing similar. Would "Preston" be facing 38 years in the can? Instead, I'm sure we'd be hearing about what a "great kid" he was but how he was maybe too much of a prankster "kind of like his dad", etc.

    2. Re:Sensationalist? by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Well, it's 38 years combined for all the charges, but they probably will only continue trying him until they get one to stick.

      It's like charging a serial killer... you hit him with as many as you have to in order to get him off the streets, then you don't bother trying the rest because what's the point? He can't spend 140 years in prison when he's only going to live to 70 or 80 anyway.

    3. Re:Sensationalist? by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Hell, we're already dealing with this in Florida in regards to Hulk Hogan's waste-of-space-and-oxygen son, who is in jail in connection with a little bit of spectacularly bad drunken driving that turned his best friend into a vegetable.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    4. Re:Sensationalist? by evil_aar0n · · Score: 1

      Bush & friends illegally spied on US citizens for years, and they won't see any jail time, or even civil lawsuits, thanks to yesterday's FISA vote. But this kid is threatened with 38 years.

      I agree, the legal system is borked.

      --
      Truth, Justice. Or the American Way.
  14. One can only hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that Kirk works for the school's IT department.

    KHAAAAAAAAAAAAN!

  15. My school server is just as bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My school server (NetWare) is just as bad. Posted anonymously for obvious reasons.

    First off, desktops are fairly locked down. But the server itself allows for RDP connections with any username (not just teachers or students).

    When you're on any old desktop, you can only access your own network share as a virtual drive. When you're connected to the school server, you get:
    -Any documents (class of 2006 or 2007, class of 2008-2011, teachers, ADMINS)
    -Network shares with installer sources and keys in text files (e.x. Microsoft Office 2007 Pro Plus with VLK, Dragon NaturallySpeaking 9, EasyGrade Pro 3, Houghton Mifflin Test Generator to accompany textbooks, etc.)
    -Access to the attendance share (which is outsourced, but the administrative login is kept on said server in house)
    -Access to backups from the other schools (junior high, intermediate, elementary)

    I was appalled when I found this out. For ethical reasons (and the legal penalties), I decided not to tell anyone or anything. Mainly because in 8th grade, my friend got his computer privileges suspended for the year when we told the computer staff that you could get a command prompt through Internet Explorer, and he almost got a disciplinary record over it.

    We tried to help them, and he got in trouble (luckily, no legal issues).(We'd send NET SEND messages to other computers - e.g. "Jane, this is the computer. That's a nice purple sweater you're wearing :)", freaked a lot of people out).

    Ever since, whenever I've found a computer issue, I've kept my mouth shut, because it's not worth the trouble.


    More on topic...this guy has what's coming to him. I think 38 years is too harsh (maybe a couple of years and more punishment in probation), but his malicious intent and clear intent makes me have no sympathy for him.

    1. Re:My school server is just as bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also... the above wouldn't be as bad if there weren't student/student and teacher/teacher username/password combos. Yes, you do have your firstinitial last name login with a custom password, but with generic logins, you can do damage without giving the school your name.

    2. Re:My school server is just as bad by William+Robinson · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Jane, this is the computer. That's a nice purple sweater you're wearing :)"

      Sweater???? You took all risk just to send message about sweater?? Jesus!!

    3. Re:My school server is just as bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >My school server (NetWare) is just as bad.
      >But the server itself allows for RDP connections

      NetWare doesn't support RDP, nor does it have "shares".

      It's probably a Windows-based server of some kind that hasn't been secured properly.

      NET SEND is a Windows networking command (from the old days of DOS networking), it uses SMB (Server Message Block), not NCP.

    4. Re:My school server is just as bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Net send is not NCP. I'm aware of that. It was a separate example...one of how knee jerk the school IT staff can be.

      Well, the RDP server is Windows 2k3 based as a frontend for the shares, which are connected via NCP.

      Maybe my post was unclear, but I was just trying to make the point that these systems aren't particularly secure (so "hacking" might be simply logging in) and that the school is so ridiculous that it's impossible to report vulnerabilities that might be used maliciously in the future.

    5. Re:My school server is just as bad by Trekologer · · Score: 1

      I feel your pain... you want to do the right thing but are surrounded by techno-morons who don't understand the technology are are usually afraid of the students that do.

      In 8th grade, the computer lab network of Macs in my school stopped working one day while the computer teacher was out sick. Naturally, I, the only in the classroom with any knowledge or skills of or with computers in general, got the blame for doing "something" to cause the network to stop working. The computer teacher didn't know what I aledgidly did or how I did it, but it had to be me. I got sent to the principal's office and the network was down for three days whil they called a repairman (the teacher also threatened to send my parents the bill since it was obviously something I did).

      Luckilly for me, the principal believed me over the computer teacher. When the repairman arrived, he quickly found the source of the probem... the AppleTalk PhoneNet modules in one of the computers was loose.

    6. Re:My school server is just as bad by ratbag · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, Netware didn't support RDP (the Remote Desktop Protocol). I'm not saying the rest of your post is inaccurate...

    7. Re:My school server is just as bad by Coopjust · · Score: 1

      My bad. A Win 2k3 server is the frontend for RDP, which grants access to the NCP shares.

    8. Re:My school server is just as bad by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      You could do what I did when I was in high school: another modem user had no firewall and had c: shared. I went in and put a text file on his desktop saying he needed a firewall or disable sharing. No names, no identifying information. Just a little 100 byte text file saying how his financial data was all in the open.

      Some people only respond after they're scared. I did nothing evil.

      --
    9. Re:My school server is just as bad by Coopjust · · Score: 1

      Well, I just gleaned that info from this comment http://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/06/21/1219205, so take it with a grain of salt.

    10. Re:My school server is just as bad by Coopjust · · Score: 1

      Bad form to reply to onself, but I failed at linking properly. Link to the comment I got the info from.

    11. Re:My school server is just as bad by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ever since, whenever I've found a computer issue, I've kept my mouth shut, because it's not worth the trouble. What trouble? Two words - anonymous email. Write up a detailed list of their security holes, get an email account that can't be traced back to you, and send them a message that says "here are your problems. I'm not exploiting them but someday someone will. Fix it or don't, it's not my problem."

      Voila. The ball's in their court. If they ignore it then they deserve to get owned. If they fix the issues you can drop them a note saying congratulations. If they haven't done anything in six months send copies of your correspondence to the local news and watch the fireworks fly as Link Beefingham and the WHAX Investigative Flying News Squad descend on your school for a live, in-depth report on how the administration refuses to protect Little Johnny and Susie from child pornography, Chinese military hackers, and internet jihadists.

      "Principal Landingham! Principal Landingham! WHY DO YOU HATE AMERICA?"

    12. Re:My school server is just as bad by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 1

      He sounds like a kid. Probably confusing a special NetWare login form that replaces the standard XP one for the server being NetWare.

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
    13. Re:My school server is just as bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nearly the same thing over here. The admin password is something like "abcd", every pupil has his account with a default password, but only 10 in 700 have changed it, same thing for teachers. Printers in the entire school building are shared, so you can just print 900 pages somewhere else to scare other people. Oh, and did I mention that you can modify the school website without being prompted for a password? It's horrible...

    14. Re:My school server is just as bad by yuna49 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sounds like he was at the age where the contents of the sweater were more interesting than the sweater itself.

    15. Re:My school server is just as bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pretty sad when instead of saying "thanks for the help - good spot, kid," your school basically says you shouldn't know more than the network administrator. My high school was the same way.

    16. Re:My school server is just as bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think that's bad? My high school had an encrypted MS Access file (trivially broken) sitting on an open share with all the combos to every locker on campus. What's worse is that when I say all the combos, I mean every single one, including the ones they could be changed to. This was shortly after the lockers had been replaced anew, so I doubt they'd be getting new locks even if they knew about this.

    17. Re:My school server is just as bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds a bit like my friend's friend. He once rebooted a school computer to the DOS prompt and got time in Quantanamo Bay for terrorism.

    18. Re:My school server is just as bad by pbhj · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up as he pwnz u with his masterful commenting and provides indelible evidence of nazi high school administrators.

      !

    19. Re:My school server is just as bad by BlueParrot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I.e, he was above 5 years old?

      Seriously tho, if you find a sweater more interesting than whoever is inside it, there is either something wrong with you or you've found some damn cool sweater ( Was it made of carbon nanotubes perhaps ? ).

    20. Re:My school server is just as bad by Ma8thew · · Score: 1

      But why take the risk? Trying to point out security issues to the admins got someone else in serious trouble, they've shown they don't want to be helped. Keep your head down, and avoid anything on your record.

    21. Re:My school server is just as bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because its possible to do something, despite a corprotation/school's best efforts to prevent it, doens't mean you should. You are describing a schools failed attempts to fully prevent something when its clear what they are trying to stop.. e.g. if accessing a command prompt is only possible through internet explorer, and you access the command prompt this way you are completely disrespecting the rules the school is attempting to lay down. Your comment clearly implies you've found a way to circumvent something.

      If people try to block something, but fail, then respect the fact that you should not be accessing it. It is not great that they did a bad job of blocking it, but it does not imply you have a right to work around a clear intention

      I don't understand why so many people think that if they find a way around something then its acceptable. If they are clearly

    22. Re:My school server is just as bad by bj+bignell · · Score: 1

      You could help solve this problem by sending an anonymous letter to the principal/dean of your school, along with the people in charge of IT. Make sure that carbon copy goes to your local school superintendent and maybe even your state/provincial gov't representative.

      Write a detailed document that describes all of the security issues you found, including clear examples and steps to reproduce the unwanted behaviour. Also a good idea is to include clear explanations of how and/or why these security problems are insignificant. Print it all out at an Internet cafe or at home - NOT at school - and then put it in the mail. Wait a week and then send an anonymous letter to your school's newspaper/newsletter describing in general terms how the systems in place are not secure an no action has been taken to correct the serious problems, even after the people in charge were alerted.

      You could even leave an opening for them to contact you through a throwaway email account. If you are a minor, it might also be a very good idea to discuss this in confidence with your parents or another adult that you can trust. If you wish to discuss the item openly with the school, perhaps talk to a lawyer first to ensure that your rights are protected.

      Posting anonymously here and whining about how the administration of your school is incompetent helps no-one.

    23. Re:My school server is just as bad by arstchnca · · Score: 1

      You think 38 years is too harsh? Wow. Compassionate.

      Despite the boy's "malicious and clear" intent to change grades (interesting use of the word malicious, at the end of the day), I don't think that any prison term is appropriate. Let's be honest - when he "perpetrated" all these "counts," did he, his parents, or his friends have any inkling that these actions were felonies, let alone illegal in the first place?

      I understand how you might want to "be hard on" crime. But this is a case in which, arguably, there are no victims and there is no damage. Furthermore, it isn't exactly an area in which morality clearly delineates boundaries to one's actions. You don't need jack knowledge of legal systems to understand the deviance represented by, say, burglary.

      Probably, the summary vastly exaggerated that he could face 38 years. But that you think you're in a position to recommend sentencing, let alone recommend prison time, for such acts is just silly. I would have posted anonymously, too; I wouldn't want evidence that I made such uncaring assertions, either.

      --
      -- arstchnca
      --
    24. Re:My school server is just as bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your school server IS NetWare, there is no way you used RDP to connect to it.

      You must be thinking of a less secure Server OS that uses RDP.

    25. Re:My school server is just as bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've kept my mouth shut, because it's not worth the trouble.


      I wish I had done the same. On my school network we discovered that if you type something along the lines of "null novell password check" into Google you could download a program that gave you you the name of an account that unfortunately for the school district worked on their student records file server. All grade files, attendance records, and various unencrypted documents were fully readable.


      We said something to a reporter and got punished once more people learned. Think suspension, then early morning police search warrant, arrest, subpoena for testifying in a trial... but in the long run no data was every changed or intended to change, we simply made the tech guys look like dumb asses and got a taste of reality.

    26. Re:My school server is just as bad by mxs · · Score: 1

      Up until the Windows System Administrator at the school (who got that title 'cause he knew how to install Windows on a computer, or got lucky enought to succeed anyway) called the FBI ('cause they obviously are the ones to call with this newfangled cyberterrorism stuff), who got a subpoena for the "anonymous" email service provider's logs (they all keep logs), got your IP (you were not smart enough to use TOR in 8th grade), traced it to your home, and called SWAT on your ass since you are obviously a cyberterrorist out to hurt the children at that school. After all, you threatened them by listing their weaknesses. That's like sending your teacher a detailed list of his or her whereabouts throughout the day and the angles he can be seen from unnoticed. At least to scared-of-terrorists-administrators-who-want-to-cover-their-asses it is.

      Yeah, it's a whole lot better to keep quiet. Admittedly the above is just one of several outcomes, but it is quite easily a possible one given the proficiency-level of many of the involved parties. Other outcomes include getting computer access revoked for the remainder of your time in school, detention, disciplinary action, expulsion, "permanent record", black marks on your transcript, etc. ... While one would like to believe that a well-meaning student trying to notify the powers-that-be of a serious (or not so much) security hole would be thanked and sent on his/her way, that's often not the case. Your chances are better if you have an adult advocate beyond reproach (say, a teacher), but that level of trust is not easy to build.

    27. Re:My school server is just as bad by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      They don't deserve to be owned. They deserve to have students who don't *want* to cheat.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    28. Re:My school server is just as bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My school was just as bad. In 2004, they had the computer's description set to the administrator password. In 2006 and 2007, they had the administrator password stored in plain text on the NETLOGON share of all domain controllers.

      Because of this, and a whole other myriad of problems, I'm lead to believe that most schools don't take IT seriously enough/invest enough in it.

      I should add, however, that this year their security has improved some what.

    29. Re:My school server is just as bad by YodaYid · · Score: 1

      If they're anything like my old high school, they would probably spend a lot more time trying to figure out who sent the letter than making any actual fixes.

    30. Re:My school server is just as bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First off..... you can't RDP into a Netware box since it's a MICROSOFT protocol. Plus, there's not much you do on the physical server anyhow

      Second, your school admins are idiots for setting things up they way they did. Proper admins would set correct security restrictions and not give access to folders that don't belong to you.

      A network server is only as good as the person who runs it

    31. Re:My school server is just as bad by dave420 · · Score: 1

      You mean "over 8 years old"?

    32. Re:My school server is just as bad by theCoder · · Score: 1

      Forget the anonymous email. Like another poster said, that could potentially be traced back. And there's the possibility that the school could take it as a threat instead of assistance.

      Better would be to just go to a local technology reporter. Preferably, a real reporter, who thinks of himself as a journalist. The kind of person who would rather go to jail than reveal his anonymous source. Explain to that person why you want to be anonymous (fear reprisals). Any responsible journalist would understand that and protect your identity.

      Even better, by going to the press, you're a protected whistleblower. It's sad that you have to get a third party involved to fix a simple issue, but that is probably the safest course.

      Possible dangers are that the reporter either won't be a professional or will not understand the issues involved and will take the school's side (that you're a dirty hacker trying to cause problems). The best way to avoid those problems are to research the particular reporter to see if he has done anything like that in the past and if the organization he works for has any policies regarding whistle blowers / anonymous sources.

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
    33. Re:My school server is just as bad by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Like another poster said, that could potentially be traced back.

      I used to give this advice, but onion routing systems like Tor might actually make this possible now.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  16. So now... by Zombie+Ryushu · · Score: 1

    We USians in a society that threatens to throw its students in jail for 40 years for changing grades.

    If your a young person. Consider moving to Canada.

    1. Re:So now... by jo7hs2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're post. suggests that perhaps you USian may have needed to. Change a few grades to survive in skool.

    2. Re:So now... by Zombie+Ryushu · · Score: 1

      I meant to write "Well, USians."

    3. Re:So now... by Binkleyz · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't really help all that much.

      Quick tip- You're means "You are". Your means "belonging to you". You're != Your.

    4. Re:So now... by Tralfamadorian · · Score: 1

      We USians in a society that threatens to throw its students in jail for 40 years for changing grades.

      If your a young person. Consider moving to Canada.

      Threatening to move to Canada... that's a paddlin'.
    5. Re:So now... by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      Frankly, that would have just made your post even more unintelligible

    6. Re:So now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And "you're" "post." suggests maybe you should not have survived English class in "skool."

    7. Re:So now... by jo7hs2 · · Score: 1

      That one went directly over your head. It then proceeded to enter a holding pattern in the desperate hope that you would figure it out before it ran out of fuel. Sheesh!

  17. In these post 9/11 times... by FatSean · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...priorities have changed. We see our government running rough-shod over the laws it holds us to, and we think, why must I follow these laws too? If the gov't can remove freedoms, liberties and rights in the name of 'homeland security' why can't I too bend/break the rules in the name of 'financial security' for my family?

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Because its not about 'Us vs Government' in this case, its about 'Us vs Us' - this wasn't a crime against the nation or government, it was a crime that has the potential to reduce other peoples efforts at education.

    2. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by King_TJ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd tend to agree with you, if we were talking about adults trying to take care of their families. Surely, there are at least SOME desperate people out there who feel like govt. has caused much of their financial hardship in recent years - and they have to "step things up a notch" to get back out of the hole they've fallen into.

      But we're talking about a high-school student here. His biggest responsibility in life is probably his schooling, and *earning* his grades. I think it's a stretch to claim his cheating via computer hacking was motivated by post 9-11 events. Rather, it's the simple desire to find short-cuts to "get ahead by any means possible".

      I agree with the people who say he probably "learned something" with his hacking efforts. I also agree that they're brining a lot of "trumped up" charges against him here. (Conspiracy charges? Uh, right..... His scheme SURELY was really all about undermining our government to overthrow it with his fake A in math!)

      Nonetheless, they can't just let this go with a "slap on the wrist" either. Too many students spent a whole year of their lives working to earn those letter grades the right way.

    3. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by spec8472 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Whilst I'm really not a lawyer, it's worth pointing out that the legal use of the word "Conspiracy" doesn't necessarily imply that it was a Government/Anarchic/Terrorism related thing.

      As ever, Wikipedia has something to say on the matter:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_(crime)

      "In the criminal law, a conspiracy is an agreement between natural persons to break the law at some time in the future, and, in some cases, with at least one overt act in furtherance of that agreement."

    4. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by achacha · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I can agree to that. When I has in grad school I was applying for a scholarship (because I could not afford the school) and was told I was beat out by a foreign student with much better grades than me. A month later they offered me the scholarship (and instructor in charge told me that the transcript they received was forged and the student did not have perfect grades). So what this Omar guy did was trivialize the grades of the students who actually got good grades and worked hard for them (possibly ruining their chances at getting into a great school). The real victims are other students not the government or the education system.

    5. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      You need some more tin foil.... or Thorazine.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    6. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by ZorinLynx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A slap on the wrist may not be enough, but 38 years in prison? You just ruined this kid's life completely.

      Why not just five years in a minimum security prison, with an emphasis on education? Rather than turn this kid into a hardened criminal by putting him in jail (where he will learn from other inmates) let's try to turn him around so he can be an asset to society instead of a liability when he gets out at age 56 with no life skills other than crime.

    7. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonetheless, they can't just let this go with a "slap on the wrist" either. Too many students spent a whole year of their lives working to earn those letter grades the right way.

      Yeah by being good at sports! I hope they put him in pound him in the ass prison. Its time we started taking back our schools post Columbine.
    8. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Rather than turn this kid into a hardened criminal by putting him in jail (where he will learn from other inmates)

      Or we could fix the jails so that they aren't training camps for would-be criminals.

    9. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by easyTree · · Score: 0

      We see our government running rough-shod over the laws it holds us to, and we think, why must I follow these laws too? If the gov't can remove freedoms, liberties and rights in the name of 'homeland security' why can't I too bend/break the rules in the name of 'financial security' for my family?

      *blink* *blink* *blink* Surely this deserves +1000 insightful, rather than -1 troll? *blink*

    10. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by jeiler · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You just ruined this kid's life completely.

      More accurately--the kid just ruined his own life completely. Taking responsibility for choices we make is all part of growing up.

      --

      If you haven't been down-modded lately, you aren't trying.

      Sacred cows make the best hamburger.

    11. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by canajin56 · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's a good idea. A good way to do this is fill them with people who aren't criminals, then they can't pass on their knowledge of crime to other prisoners. But I think they are doing this already!

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    12. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by UltraAyla · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly. Put him somewhere that emphasizes his mistakes, but which also emphasizes that his life is not decided for him and that he could have a bright future if he works for it.

    13. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by iminplaya · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But you don't threaten to lock him up for almost 40 years, unless he's an immigrant...named Omar, I guess. An actor's or politician's kid from Beverly Hills might make the front page of the National Inquirer and that would be the end of it.

      --
      What?
    14. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why not just five years in a minimum security prison, with an emphasis on education?

      Because if they really crack down on "illegal" immigration, the prisons will be our only source of near free labor.

      --
      What?
    15. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So this one high school kid has somehow changed the entire perception of the entire system's worth?

      No. You are wrong.

      He's just a kid, no more evil than Ferris Bueller - and no perceptions will be changed except sentencing (if he actually gets anything over a year).

    16. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by Original+Replica · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Nonetheless, they can't just let this go with a "slap on the wrist" either.

      Given how fucked up our "corrections" system is, a slap on the wrist is the only chance this kid (and society) has of not becoming a life long criminal and drain on taxpayers. If this kid does even one year just out of highschool, what will have learned from his fellow inmates about life as an adult? Certainly not the kind of lessons that will lead to him being a productive member of society. What was the kid's motivation to commit these crimes? He wanted to get into a good school. Why would he want to do that? So he could learn the skills to be productive member of society.

      Sure he needs something like a suspended sentence over his head to enforce the idea of that this is not acceptable behavior, but he also needs to has his non-trivial talents and efforts used to pull this off channeled into a job or college major that will make him a useful part of society.He is at a crossroads where he will either contribute to or detract from our mutual society, depending on how we react to his crimes. Punishing him out of spite will harm us all in the end.

      --
      We are all just people.
    17. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

      Try to keep in mind to say hello to me next time, or I'll literally take a sword to cut your head off. You should take responsibility for your own choices in deciding to be impolite.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    18. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by Walkingshark · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It seems to me, though, that by devauling education to the point where a high school diploma is basically worthless and a college degree is equivalent to what a diploma used to be, as a culture we Americans send a message to everyone that the grades have no inherent value anyways, they're just another hoop to jump through.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    19. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just ruined this kid's life completely.

      No, he just ruined his own life completely. It's not like the sentencing is arbitrary. He had to have known what he was doing was illegal, and because of that he could have stopped for a minute and figured out how long he could spend in jail because of it. Yes, the punishment is harsh, but he should have thought about that before he decided to commit the crime.

    20. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes you do, the 38 years quoted in the article is particularly inflammatory as its the maximum he could get for all of his charges back to back. He won't get the maximum on any convictions (people rarely do), and he almost certainly won't get back-to-back sentencing, his terms will be concurrent. If convicted, he will most likely get anything from a suspended sentence to a couple of years.

    21. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by jeiler · · Score: 1

      Oh, goody: A_beautiful_mind has learned a new skill. Can everybody say "equivocation"?

      The student in question chose to do not one, but a series of illegal acts, including breaking and entering (a felony any way you look at it). Yes, he's in a shitload of trouble--not because he offended somebody, but because he broke the law.

      --

      If you haven't been down-modded lately, you aren't trying.

      Sacred cows make the best hamburger.

    22. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by tacocat · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No, I think he gets 38 years of lock-up because he's exhibiting a pervasive, consistent, and intentional malicious behaviour well beyond trivial hacking.

      I think because he's an immigrant he and his family stand a good chance of deportation and should. I think it is perfectly reasonable for the host nation to expect pristine behaviour and failing that you are clearly subject to deportation.

      There isn't any poor victim here. He's someone who has those Machiavellian traits that might get him girls but not social acceptance. Either put him in prison or toss him out of the country.

    23. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conspiracy charges? Uh, right..... His scheme SURELY was really all about undermining our government to overthrow it with his fake A in math! A conspiracy charge doesn't mean they think you were trying to overthrow the government. It means they think you got together with some other people and planned out a crime.
    24. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by iminplaya · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Too bad he's an immigrant. We could elect him president. He seems fully qualified.

      --
      What?
    25. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by mmyrfield · · Score: 1

      Be careful about shocking headlines. If it seems ridiculous, it probably is. The maximum combined sentence for his crimes may be 38 years, but I'd be more than willing to bet that he gets no jail time at all. It sounds like his family is well off, and will be able to afford a lawyer who will be able to successfully play the "he's just a poor kid who crumbled under the overwhelming pressures in society to get into a good school".

    26. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

      The matter of the fact is that I've been simply trying to make a point that while it is true this kid committed something immoral and possibly illegal, the scope of punishment, even if it is "just" a few years of jailtime, is not in balance with the seriousness of his crime. There is nothing equivocational (oh gaed, I always wanted to say that!) about this.

      Viewing the question from the standpoint of the legal system, I think that it harms the robustness, fairness and the balance of justice to talk about 60+ counts of offense and 38 years in jail, even if in reality the punishment will probably be much lighter. The theoretical possibility gives rise to personally biased judgements in the case of people who just "don't look right". The upper limit for someone breaking into a school and modifying grades on the school computer is 38 years in prison, apparently. That is preposterous.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    27. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by Pyrion · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Trumped up charges are one thing, trumped up charges versus hubris are another. Hubris is the exception to the rule. If he got caught due to the school system doing a period review of its records or something official and typical like that, then sure, they're being unusually harsh with the kid. That's not the case. The kid was arrogant and stupid enough to ask the school for a transcript, with the school knowing damn well that this kid couldn't possibly be accepted to a university, not with his shitty grades. That's hubris, and that's why this kid's in jail with 69 criminal charges and a $50,000 bail.

      --
      "There is much pleasure to be gained from useless knowledge." - Bertrand Russell.
    28. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by Pyrion · · Score: 1

      Crap. That should've been "periodic."

      --
      "There is much pleasure to be gained from useless knowledge." - Bertrand Russell.
    29. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "-1 Troll" was the closest available mod to the desired "-1 fuck me this guy is batshit insane".

    30. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flamebait, really? Pointing out the developmental impact of prison on a first time offender teenager is flamebait? Huh. I would have thought that something like: "He has offended the Nerds with his grade tampering! 40 years of prison rape will teach him not to question the authority of academia!" would be flamebait but I guess that would have been insightful or something...

    31. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by jeiler · · Score: 1

      The matter of the fact is that I've been simply trying to make a point that while it is true this kid committed something immoral and possibly illegal, the scope of punishment, even if it is "just" a few years of jailtime, is not in balance with the seriousness of his crime.

      ABMind, I'm not sure if you read the "fine article," but one of the entries on his list of crimes is six counts of burglary--and I'm not talking about hacking, I'm talking kicking down a door (or whatever method he used). That's a pretty serious offense in the eyes of the law, and yeah, if he gets a couple of years in jail, he "bought it at the store his own self."

      Now, what's probably going to happen is that he'll get time served (Mommie and Daddie aren't bailing him out, remember), probation (probably with some ridiculous "Don't touch computers" clause), community service, a hefty fine, restitution, and court costs. The penalty quoted in TFA is the absolute worst case scenario, but I don't reckon there's even a snowball's chance in hell he'll actually serve a tenth of the 38 year maximum.

      I quite agree that 38 years is too much. But--call me hard-hearted if you choose--I do hope he gets more than a slap on the wrist.

      There is nothing equivocational (oh gaed, I always wanted to say that!) about this.

      Hey, the word itself is worth geek points!

      Look at it this way--I'm not sure of where he's from, but with a name like that it is quite possible he's from an area that practices Sharia law. Under Sharia law, burglary can get you a death sentence, depending on the circumstances.

      The upper limit for someone breaking into a school and modifying grades on the school computer is 38 years in prison, apparently. That is preposterous.

      Again, this will probably sound hard-hearted--but stupidity has its own rewards. Omar Khan is about to reap as he has sewn--fortunately for him, the "harvest" will be considerably lighter than it could otherwise be.

      --

      If you haven't been down-modded lately, you aren't trying.

      Sacred cows make the best hamburger.

    32. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by Haeleth · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The point, I guess, is that the law should not even suggest that such a sentence might be possible for a case like this. Even a couple of years in jail would be unjust and counterproductive (likely outcome: the kid meets some real fraudsters and learns how to apply his hacking skills to steal credit cards). A suspended sentence would be appropriate, to make sure he doesn't get tempted to hack anything else. Beyond that, the kid has basically punished himself -- no college is going to take him now, and he'll have a tough time finding employment too.

      Kids are always going to try hacking school networks, and decades behind bars is basically never going to be an appropriate punishment for that. So we need specific laws that are dedicated to cases like this, and specify suitable punishments, instead of applying generic laws that were written with totally different scenarios in mind. That way, we could be reassured that the law will continue to dish out justice appropriately, and nobody will be able to defend inflammatory headlines like this any more.

    33. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      More accurately--the kid just ruined his own life completely.

      Indeed, but that's true regardless of whether he goes to jail or not -- what school will accept someone who has done something like this? What company will want to employ him?

      It's hard to see what benefit a jail term would provide in this case; frankly it would be a waste of taxpayers' money. Far better to give him a fine or some community service or whatever, and let the real punishment be the fact that he is marked for life as a liar and a cheat.

    34. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its very hard to write laws that take into all the variations that can occur. And I doubt it would improve the legal system.

      Do you try and modify the law so that altering a record on its own has one sentence, but if you modify many records it isn't as long a sentence per record? Or perhaps the sentence should also vary on the perceived "importance" of the record. Do we then have to create a sentencing manual with "record types" and sentences?

      In the current system we count on the judge, who will also be given a recommendation by the prosecutor, to not be an idiot and hand out an appropriate sentence.

      In reality neither the judge or the prosecutor have any real desire to put this kid away for 38 years. I doubt this even goes to trial, he probably pleads guilty, pays a fine, and goes on probation for several years.

    35. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by truesaer · · Score: 1

      The point, I guess, is that the law should not even suggest that such a sentence might be possible for a case like this.


      And it doesn't...each charge has a possible maximum sentence, which is where the nonsense number of 38 years came from. But there are additional laws and sentencing guidelines that govern whether the charges are concurrent or consecutive, where in the possible range of sentences a person with certain characteristics should fall. And there are laws that provide for first time offenders, for diversion programs, etc.

    36. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by instarx · · Score: 1

      He won't get the maximum on any convictions (people rarely do), and he almost certainly won't get back-to-back sentencing, his terms will be concurrent. If convicted, he will most likely get anything from a suspended sentence to a couple of years. For you and me this might not be a huge problem, but this guy is an immigrant and not a citizen. The INS is very tough on immigrants who commit even petty crimes. If being charged with 69 felonies weren't enough, one of them is a serious breaking and entering charge which probably seals his fate. Under INS rules he doesn't even have to be found guilty to suffer immigration problems - the INS can just decide it was likely he was involved in these crimes and deport him. I suspect this guy's life is ruined.

    37. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by Brieeyebarr · · Score: 0

      RTFS(summary). He's 18, so his family isn't involved and stands no chance of being deported over this.

    38. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by owlstead · · Score: 1

      The part of growing up is making mistakes and learning from it. You can hardly say this is true when you put somebody away for a very long time, basically denying him his youth (or in this case, early adulthood).

      If you put this person in prison for a long period of time (or even for *any* time) you ruin the rest of his life. Besides that, you remove a possibly productive person from society, which you have to take care for. Beyond that, the chances of him becoming a full fledged criminal or him staying in prison will be much larger.

      Yes, these are pretty bad mistakes. Taking this up with a judge is probably a good thing to do (in the Netherlands we would probably call this overreacting already). Give him some penalty like cleaning up roads for a while, a penalty (basically telling his parents that they did a poor job) and try to get him straight. He's probably punished quite severely already, and he's very unlikely to make this mistake ever again.

      Putting people in prison for such a thing is really thinking backwards.

    39. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      That's not what a conspiracy is! I just checked Wikipedia and this is the real definition:

      "In the criminal law, a conspiracy is an agreemony between natural persons and chickens to break the law and take over the world at some time in the future, and, in some cases, with at least one overt act in furtherancity of that agreementary."

      Please, check your source correctly before posting bogus facts you made up.

      And beware of chickens.

              -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    40. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      And who ruined it? He did. The guy only has himself to blame.

    41. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by instarx · · Score: 1

      No argument there. However, it is well established in our culture that kids should get a second chance so being stupid as a kid doesn't have to ruin your life. That's what typically happens in the court - he would get a second chance with a short or suspended sentence, or probation - lesson learned. But immigrants face a bigger challenge from the INS where there is NO SECOND CHANCE. Is this right? If what he did would only get an American kid probation, is it right to deport him at 18 to be separated from his family for the rest of his life - even if he is a jerk? I don't know, but I suspect not.

    42. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by easyTree · · Score: 1

      "-1 Troll" was the closest available mod to the desired "-1 fuck me this guy is batshit insane".

      There are lots of us who are the same flavour of 'insane' as him... No clue what your excuse for 'sanity' is. Wake up dude.
    43. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Hes 18, in my country thats the age of majority - hes no longer a 'kid'. The fact that he is an immigrant means he should be on his best behaviour at all times anyway, countries are not in the business of importing problems.

    44. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by instarx · · Score: 1

      I think you're just being pig-headed because someone pointed out his punishment wasn't going to be as trivial as you said it was. He's in high school, so he's still a kid. This isn't murder or rape, it's changing grades. You really need to get a handle on your sense of perspective.

    45. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Why should any country deliberately import criminals? Because thats what this person is. Don't you have enough criminals of your own?

      And just because hes still in education does not make him a kid. He knew he had to be on his best behaviour because of his immigration status, he knew he was breaking laws when he did what he did, he knew that because of his age he was no longer considered a minor.

    46. Re:In these post 9/11 times... by rtechie · · Score: 1

      There is a thing called "proportion".

      38 years is a ridiculous sentence for rape or armed robbery. This kid changed his fucking grades. The "burglary" charges are for going to his school after hours. There is no evidence he actually stole, destroyed, or damaged anyone or anything. He CHEATED on TESTS. CHEATED. That's it.

      Stop trolling jeiler.

  18. Dumb by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    While I feel a certain amount of pity for anyone who has to spend time in prison, I think what he did was really unwise. What he did probably shows a certain skill and adeptness that could be useful, but he could have shown that without actually messing with the data and improving his own scores. By doing the latter, he has firmly crossed the line into malice. You just don't do that.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  19. Re:PUNISHMENT FITS THE CRIME by Paranatural · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who is supporting him? No one is saying he did a good thing, they are just saying 38 years is pretty insane for changing some grades. You can get less time for killing someone. Or maybe even two someones.

  20. Unsurprisngly DIDN'T post bail? by zippthorne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not surprisingly, his parents (who have only recently immigrated to America) have decided not to post the $50,000 bail and Kahn is in jail awaiting trial.

    I don't know what so unsurprising about that. No parent wants their kid to spend time in freakin' lockup. Further, they can leverage $5,000 of real dollars with a bail bondsman to post $50k, so they just need to sell the kid's computer and scrape together a few thousand more to spare him potentially weeks behind bars.

    Heck, banks will loan the money for bail, and I seriously doubt they get the loan-shark like interest the bail bondsman would.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    1. Re:Unsurprisngly DIDN'T post bail? by Captain+Centropyge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe it's because his parents are actually pissed that he did something so blatantly stupid..? If you knowingly do something with bad intentions, there should be consequences. My parents taught me that. I'm glad to see teaching the principle of responsibility for your actions hasn't been completely lost.

      --
      Bite my shiny metal ass!
    2. Re:Unsurprisngly DIDN'T post bail? by bunratty · · Score: 1

      Damn, he sure has one fancy pants computer if it's worth thousands used! Or are you saying it'll fetch tons of cash on eBay because some hacker doodz would think it's l33t?

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    3. Re:Unsurprisngly DIDN'T post bail? by icebrain · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, if I'd actually done this (or any other multitude of crimes), my parents would have left my ass in jail to rot, too.

      I know a guy whose parents kept bailing him out. It only made him bolder and willing to do more crap each time.

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    4. Re:Unsurprisngly DIDN'T post bail? by Firethorn · · Score: 2

      No parent wants their kid to spend time in freakin' lockup.

      You didn't have the joy of 'tough love' parents then. If I'd screwed up this bad, I'd have been declining bail.

      Other than that, it's a matter of finances in some cases. That $5k of 'real dollars' to the bail bondsman is forfeit even if the kids shows up in court. If they're 'newly' arrived, they're likely low on funds, lack credit history, all that.

      So the question becomes 'do we bail him out or spend the $5k on a lawyer to keep him out of prison?'.

      Personally, I'd probably end up going for the lawyer. $5k there can help reduce the sentence in a case like this much more so than getting out of jail for a few weeks before the trial. Assuming he's guilty as heck, he's going to spend some time in jail or prison anyways - in which case the confinement before the trial counts as 'time served'.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    5. Re:Unsurprisngly DIDN'T post bail? by TomRK1089 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I know if I had pulled some stupid shit like that, there's no way my parents would bail my ass out.

      As for the posters who say "Oh, it doesn't matter, not like you learn anything in the US schools, hur hur hur," guess what? Read the fucking paper. I do, and I read the stories right around this time every year about the valedictorians and salutorians who have excelled in every class and are on their way to impressive schools with a lot of money in scholarships -- you think they haven't learned anything? They've put in the time and the effort to master the subjects, above and beyond what a lot of other students do. For someone like this to try and get credit without the subsequent effort cheapens what they've done.

      Another thing is the AP exams -- I'd wager that's why they're being so harsh on him. You sign a boatload of contracts when you take those tests; they're very serious about security for them. And guess what? They cost a fair amount of money besides, nearly 90 dollars apiece. I took five of them in high school, and got four 5's and a 4. Again, when someone else tries to cheat the system, when I've busted my ass to earn those, it undermines the rest of the system.

      Now yes, 38 years is excessive when compared to other crimes. But again, he knew the consequences and he's an adult. For those complaining about taxes -- did your taxes magically jump 0.003 percent when this story broke? No? Then guess what -- you've already paid for him, or someone else to take that same spot. It's not like the prison is going to knock on your door and demand an extra grand or so each month from you.

    6. Re:Unsurprisngly DIDN'T post bail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This article does not mention it, but some of the local rags here in the OC are all over it. The kid lives in Coto de Caza. This is the same "low rent" gated community where they film The Real Housewives of Orange County. It's the kind of place where a Mercedes is considered low budget, and it's not uncommon to play "count the Ferraris and Lamborghinis" coming out of the gates. I bet the parents could have scraped a few grand together for the bail money. They probably spend more on gardening.

    7. Re:Unsurprisngly DIDN'T post bail? by asylumx · · Score: 1

      I wish more parents would think that way. Children are so babied nowadays (or even 10 years ago when I was that age) that when they grow up they think there are no consequences at all.

    8. Re:Unsurprisngly DIDN'T post bail? by v(*_*)vvvv · · Score: 1

      I find it unsurprising, but sad.

      Some here cite tough love, but there is at time and place for everything.

      It isn't like he stole money from your wallet, or beat up a kid at school and came home bragging.

      The kid got caught, detained, jailed, and is facing a maximum sentence that surpasses your life expectancy. The kid already has no future, is scared to death, and will have no life for whatever his sentence turns out to be.

      Ya, no bail. That'll teach em - teach em hard. That'll make him think twice before he hacks into any computer whenever he gets out. He hurt so many people's... feelings. He exposed the system for being what it is, err insecure. Cheating in the US is such an atrocious crime. It's like... taking steroids in the Major League.

      If the parents couldn't afford bail, then I would sympathize. But if they really are just trying to be part of a lesson, then maybe they are part of why this kid fell off the deep end in the first place.

    9. Re:Unsurprisngly DIDN'T post bail? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Some here cite tough love, but there is at time and place for everything.

      Agreed, I'm Mr Tough Love, but I'll point out something. When I say 'tough love', I mean a system where a kid is punished for doing wrong. If I did something wrong, I knew I would be punished. If I didn't do something wrong, my parents stood up for me 100%. To the point that at least one teacher stopped teaching because of me.

      I KNEW that if I did something illegal that my parent's wouldn't bail me out. I've never been arrested, and now hold a high security job.

      I have a cousin who's mother bailed him out of everything she could. He's cost her at least tens of thousands of dollars, in bail, lawyers fees, various fines and all that. For what use? He's just gotten out of prison, after spending time in jail a half dozen times before that. I see it as a final result of him never receiving the consequences of his actions when a child - Momma always got him out of it.

      The kid got caught, detained, jailed, and is facing a maximum sentence that surpasses your life expectancy. The kid already has no future, is scared to death, and will have no life for whatever his sentence turns out to be.

      Not mine. I have longer than that left. As I mentioned, it's incredibly unlikely that he'll be sentenced to that length of a sentence, much less serve it. He can also still turn his life around, though the statistics are against him, I'll admit. I'd recommend learning a trade while in prison. An electrician or a plumber can make good money.

      He hurt so many people's... feelings. He exposed the system for being what it is, err insecure. Cheating in the US is such an atrocious crime. It's like... taking steroids in the Major League.

      First, as others mentioned, he did more than hurt other's feelings. There's a very real possibility that students didn't get into colleges because their rankings dropped - for every person he inserted into the top 10%, one who'd actually earned the position lost it. This can have the result of them not making it into the college of their choice.
      Second, he was no whitehat. A whitehat wouldn't have changed the grades, he'd have reported the vulnerability.
      Third, cheating IS a serious crime. How serious? Well, think about what the IRS does when people cheat on their taxes. When an accounting firm 'cheats' on their calculations. When a investment broker cheats... The consequences of a third grader cheating might not seem to be a big issue initially, but it establishes a pattern.
      Fourth - Major league steroids? It's actually a big issue. Look at the olympics - people have lost their medals over it. Congressional hearings have been held. Etc...

      If the parents couldn't afford bail, then I would sympathize. But if they really are just trying to be part of a lesson, then maybe they are part of why this kid fell off the deep end in the first place.

      Personally, I wouldn't be surprised if the parents got a lawyer BEFORE bailing the kid out, and the lawyer recommended against it. Remember, time served in jail can count towards the sentence. Why spend thousands of dollars to merely delay when the kid gets out of prison?

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    10. Re:Unsurprisngly DIDN'T post bail? by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Mine would have done the same and then probably come to visit every couple of days to ask how the lesson learnin' was coming along.

      The best educational example I ever saw was when I lived in Virgina Beach, and a kid (about 8 or so) got busted at the local 7-11 for trying to lift a pack of gum. His mom came down and talked with the store clerk, then she called the cops herself and had them come down and take him away for a few hours, which they were quite happy to do. Go mom.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    11. Re:Unsurprisngly DIDN'T post bail? by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      For those complaining about taxes -- did your taxes magically jump 0.003 percent when this story broke?

      Dammit, I was told there would be no math in this thread!

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    12. Re:Unsurprisngly DIDN'T post bail? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Nah, they probaly get a few hundred for it, but it is his bail they're making, so his stuff gets sold first to make it. It's only fair, and certainly a valid part of the punishment the parents would mete out. I'm not sure what kind of lesson you teach by letting the kid stay in lockup, though. I should think a day or two would be enough of a taste, for a guy who'se committed a pretty white-collar crime, if you're just trying to scare the kid straight.

      Not saying it's not serious, or the kid shouldn't be punished, but I really don't understand parents who expect the court system to do their job for them.

      Now, granted, the courts may decide that the public debt can only be satisfied with prison time, but you'd expect the parents to do everything in their power to keep their kid out of jail and as free of criminal record as possible. It's not unheard of for criminals to reform and eventually get rewarding jobs that they enjoy, but it's not exactly easy.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    13. Re:Unsurprisngly DIDN'T post bail? by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      Heck, banks will loan the money for bail, and I seriously doubt they get the loan-shark like interest the bail bondsman would.
      I wouldn't be so sure, given the current credit squeeze; but to be fair, I haven't tried to post bail with a bank lately.
      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
    14. Re:Unsurprisngly DIDN'T post bail? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I think I read about it once, and the issue is flight risk. Bail bondsmen use the retainer for the bounty if you run, but they'll take almost anyone as a client. Banks have to be more choosy. But it's unlikely that the parents would flee with the kid, and they can put a lien on the parents' assets until the loan is paid off, so they can afford lower returns.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    15. Re:Unsurprisngly DIDN'T post bail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't understand how mot bail bondsmen work at all.

      They don't get interest for their efforts. You got the 10% figure right but you also have to sign away collateral for the other 45 if the kid decides to jump his bond and they have to go after him. If they can't catch him they have to put up the other 45 and they will take whatever they can from you to ensure that it comes out of your pocket and not theirs.

      For their troubles and to help mitigate any potential risks, they keep that 5k bond for themselves.

      A new trend lately is to not get you to put up collateral such as a house or a car that might have a lien on it, but rather get you to sign a power of attorney agreement so they can take everything you own.

    16. Re:Unsurprisngly DIDN'T post bail? by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Go mom.

      Now that's parenting. At 8 years old there will be no permanent marking on the kids record, but they'll have learnt that the laws do apply to them. They might be a bit shitty at mum for a bit (mum called the cops on me?), but they'll get over it.

      By 18, there isn't a lot left a parent can do without significant pain. Breaking lifelong habits (eg no matter what you do i'll bail you out) are going to hurt both parties a lot. It's much easier when the kids are younger.

    17. Re:Unsurprisngly DIDN'T post bail? by Maxmin · · Score: 1

      Points off on the original /. poster (the brown guy), for transforming this idle (and somewhat unprofessional, plus obviously not verified) speculation on the part of the article's author--

      "Perhaps his parents are teaching him a harsh lesson by not putting up the $50000 bail money."

      Into a concrete fact not appearing in the linked article, by way of assertion--

      Not surprisingly, his parents ... have decided not to post the $50,000 bail and Kahn is in jail awaiting trial."

      So, from idle speculation to full-on fact, huh.

      --
      O lord, bless this thy holy hand grenade, that with it thou mayest blow thine enemies to tiny bits, in thy mercy.
  21. Lessons by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

    I would hope he learned that he either shouldn't be doing it, or shouldn't get caught, otherwise he can should probably learn to get used to being in jail.

  22. Re:PUNISHMENT FITS THE CRIME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your confusing the reaction to the absurdity of the potential imprisonment with people defending him. The only question here is the punishment and whether jail time is required and home much if so or if another punishment is needed. The little dumb ass deserves something but bare minimum I suggest is all of his grades for the year be revoked and he be forced to repeat his last year and some jail time for the break and enters, at least his summer and he can be released just in time to start his school year over again.

  23. Better Summary... by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Is at Gizmodo

    The kid is also facing burglary charges because he stole a key to the school and used it to break in several times. The first thing to remember in this case is that it's not just a simple computer crime case, and that 12 other students also had their grades changed.

    Further, of course the kid faces 38 years; every one of the small crimes he committed carry a maximum penalty. If you add them all up, you get 38 years. Obviously that doesn't mean that the kid is going to serve anywhere near that amount.

    Now, I'm not sitting here saying that this kid should get 38 years. Far from it. But I do think that some jail time is called for. In addition to the burglary charge and the financial hit to fix the problems he caused, he hurt a lot of students. Consider this: For every one of the 13 kids who moved into the top 10% ranking, someone who had earned their spot had to leave. That student may not have been able to get into the college of his or her choice, and - far more importantly - may have missed out on substantial scholarship money. This kid wasn't just harming his high school through the added expense to audit records and security policies, he was hurting totally innocent fellow students.

    1. Re:Better Summary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the clearest and most rational post I've ever read on Slashdot, and I've been here for nearly a decade.

    2. Re:Better Summary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For every one of the 13 kids who moved into the top 10% ranking, someone who had earned their spot had to leave. That student may not have been able to get into the college of his or her choice, and - far more importantly - may have missed out on substantial scholarship money. This kid wasn't just harming his high school through the added expense to audit records and security policies, he was hurting totally innocent fellow students. Welcome to the world of affirmative action
    3. Re:Better Summary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree. His action has much greater implications than simply within the vicinity of his high school. It quintessentially undermines the education system. He should be made an example of with an appropriate sentencing.

    4. Re:Better Summary... by volxdragon · · Score: 1

      Bingo! People are to quick to gloss over the full ramifications to others in this case. Simply whining that he shouldn't get 38 years in jail (which everyone knows won't happen) derails the conversation of the real damage the guy has done. Not only to the 12 others he altered grades for, but the entire rest of his graduating class (who got bumped down in rank) and classes yet to come. If you think for a moment that colleges don't hear and know about problem high schools, you're sadly mistaken. This will haunt the next class as well when college admission administrators think (rightly or wrongly), "they allowed a screw up once, will it happen again". The full impact won't ever really be known, but it will be a lot larger than people are thinking.

    5. Re:Better Summary... by arstchnca · · Score: 1

      Consider this:
      For every day of this "some jail time" that you believe "is called for," this child will spend one day away from friends, family, and familiar places. Do you know what it's like to be a child and be isolated from everything you know? Ostensibly, because you are a criminal?

      In my state, juvenile prisons (and most prisons) have been constructed miles and miles from anything. On it's face, this seems like a good idea, but at the end of the day, it means one thing: even if these people have social support in their lives, in the way of family or friends or whatnot, they will be completely isolated from them.

      Sure, your parents can visit. But only in these time slots. And only after driving, oh, four hundred miles. Oh, looks like the visit's over, see you in two weeks mom, I'll just go back to my institutionalized life where my identity as a rulebreaker and deviant is reinforced by my mere presence, my living conditions are lonely and lacking stimulation, and where I can't really make any progress in terms of personal growth or social connections. And that is if your parents have the economic means to not be working every free minute, not have other obligations that preclude visiting, and possess means of transportation. Let's just assume everyone's as up in the status quo as we are!

      So many posters advocate jailtime (although most are careful to preface it with a "38 years is a bit much..." statement). I don't care if this kid tried to kill someone. He is not threat to me and I certainly don't need him imprisoned to feel that way. Furthermore, I can't in good conscience believe that imprisonment will combat any notions of recidivism - obviously he won't be changing to many grades from juvenile hall, but confrontation with the "justice industry" does little good in anyone's life.

      Taking away this kid's freedom is totally an acceptable response for how he cruelly defrauded those "top students" of their "spots."

      --
      -- arstchnca
      --
    6. Re:Better Summary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      He has commited crimes. That merits punishment. If he had not commited those crimes, none of this would have happened. Ultimately he chose to have this happen when he illegally hacked into the school and altered not only his but also others grades. Nothing else is relevant. He IS a criminal, and the damage he has done is to everyone who depends on the system he defrauded.

    7. Re:Better Summary... by neurolux · · Score: 0

      If he gets the 38 years, I hope he at least gets to keep the straight A's. I'm only sayin'.....

    8. Re:Better Summary... by khallow · · Score: 1

      For every day of this "some jail time" that you believe "is called for," this child will spend one day away from friends, family, and familiar places. Do you know what it's like to be a child and be isolated from everything you know? Ostensibly, because you are a criminal?

      Yes. That is the nature of punishment for severe crimes. It is unpleasant. Plus, he is apparently 18 years old now and hence, not a child.

    9. Re:Better Summary... by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 1

      I won't fall back on others' reference to the fact that he is 18 and therefore not a child. 18 year-olds are, in most cases, definitely still "children" in the United States.

      I also hate to rehash criminal theory, but we'll go down that road here.

      The kid hasn't yet been convicted of a crime. Yada-yada, he'll be judged by a jury of his peers. There will be no "ostensibly" regarding his status as a criminal. If you agree with the laws he broke (I find it hard to believe that someone would find burglary and non-prank computer crime to be seriously objectionable laws), then it's hard to attach "ostensibly" to that sentence.

      This kid has likely caused 6 figures worth of damage. Auditing records isn't cheap, nor is the audit for security procedures and processes. You can argue that those procedures and processes should be there in the first place (and I'd tend to agree), but the expense now exists because this kid acted the way he did. Those six figures don't include the potential cost to other students whose class standing was reduced by this kid's actions. You seem dismissive of those students, but I can't understand why. Your impassioned defense of what this person stands to lose could very easily be adapted into what every one of those students stands to lose, so I'm curious as to why they warrant sarcasm while the accused garners sympathy.

      So we'll venture on into criminal theory. I'm curious about what you would suggest IS an acceptable punishment, especially given that you don't find a prison sentence acceptable for attempted murder. I would hope that's hyperbole, but it appears that your notion of appropriate criminal justice hinges entirely on whether someone is a direct threat to you. Would you argue for a fine, and if so, what amount would be appropriate? If not a fine and not a criminal sentence, what do you feel is an appropriate response? Out of curiosity, what is an appropriate response for someone who attempts murder?

      Understand that a prison sentence for this student serves not only the obvious - keeping him from changing grades - but also the deterrent factor on other potential offenders. Understand also that some people (I don't find myself among them) believe that prison sentences serve as proper vengeance. Finally, understand that the loss of daily contact with friends and family is an inherent part of the punishment meted out by the court. You're free to disagree with any of those theories regarding criminal justice, but you won't find many who will take you seriously when you mock victims of crime and offer few suggestions regarding the proper way to address criminal behavior.

  24. Mod parent up by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

    Because he gives a good example (his friend's computer privileges) of how a paranoid system deters white hat hackers, so the field is left to the real criminals.
    Did you notice how reports about benevolent hackers have become rare over the last years, while computer criminality flourishes?

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
    1. Re:Mod parent up by Drakonik · · Score: 1

      That's because criminality IS flourishing. Plus, all the stories about how Joe Schmoe performed penetration testing and prevented a minor DoS attack would be boring and unintelligible to the average person. It's easier to headline "STUDENT BREAKS INTO SCHOOL AND STEALS INTERNETS FROM HARD DRIVES".

  25. too good to pass up by Libertarian001 · · Score: 2, Funny

    KHAAANNNN!

    [echo]

    KHAAANNNN!

  26. Don't do the crime if you can't to the time. by ToasterTester · · Score: 1

    Don't do the crime if you can't to the time.

    I doubt they will give him 38 years probably a couple year and get out in half of that. So he'll get a good lesson out.

    1. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't to the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't do the crime if you can't to the time.

      I learned that by watching "Baretta".

  27. Better punishment by j1976 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Guys like this should be sentenced to public service instead, for example to working for free as an assistant computer teacher for a year, under monitorship from the authorities. That'd turn his obvious competence into something useful, as well as being a net benefit to the society economically.

    1. Re:Better punishment by asylumx · · Score: 1
      from a previous post:

      The kid is also facing burglary charges because he stole a key to the school and used it to break in several times.
      That is a tangible crime, I don't want anyone thinking they B&E my home and get off with raking the grass at the local park as a result.
    2. Re:Better punishment by couchslug · · Score: 1

      That's not punishment, and from his demonstrated attitude he'd make a poor example as a teacher.

      He needs to be in an orange jumpsuit raking up litter where his former schoolmates can see him and he can be subject to appropriate ridicule. He is not valuable. Those who do their work and earn their grades are valuable. Punishment emphasizes that difference.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  28. Re:For those of you so against telecom immunity by MariusBoo · · Score: 1

    Fuck AT&T. It is not a person, it is a company and as such deserves no sympathy. They shouldn't have broken the law because the "authorities" told them they can.

  29. Waste to throw him in prison for 38 years... by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's 38 years under tax payer care. Honestly I say find a way to put him to work with the talent he has so he's not as much a burden and keep him under heavy watch as he does the work.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  30. should have followed the prime directive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    KHaaaaaaaaaaaan!

  31. Re:For those of you so against telecom immunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you seriously comparing a student cheating on grades to national corruption? Why do people think that asking rhetorical questions is a good method of arguing?

  32. I don't know... by CyberData4 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I mean...what the kid did was dumb, granted. But should his ENTIRE life really be completely ruined because he tried to cheat and boost his test scores in fucking high school? Seriously? There are rapists that face less jail time. Murderers who face less jail time. Corrupt politicians who start wars with other nations, unprovoked...that face no jail time. And you're going to hop on the "he's getting what he deserves" bandwagon? Shit, I *DO* support that kid. And yes, he's just a kid. A dumb, arrogant kid that made a stupid mistake. But in the end, no ones been harmed except himself. Expell him from school. Make him repeat the 12th grade. Let him stand on his own two at a community college until he can prove that he's ready for a 4 year program. I just don't think this is worth destroying a life over......

    1. Re:I don't know... by Captain+Centropyge · · Score: 1

      And where do you draw the line..? College? Grad school? He knew what he was doing was wrong. Besides, it's not like he'll actually see much prison time, if any. Stupid mistake, yes. But the courts decide his punishment, not the school. As I posted previously, he's not the first one to get busted for this. He's smart enough to commit this kind of crime. I'm sure he knew the consequences could be severe.

      --
      Bite my shiny metal ass!
    2. Re:I don't know... by CyberData4 · · Score: 1

      I draw the line when a REAL crime is committed. That's where. Just because "ohhh, it's a crime" doesn't mean someone's entire fucking life should be potentially ruined. This is how it should go: 1. Put the fear of God into the kid (Facing up to 38 years, I think we can safely say this has been taken care of) 2. Make him do some community service (1000 hours or w/e) 3. Let him move on with his life. That's like saying an illegal downloader should get 5 years in jail. Cause you know....they're breaking teh lawz!

    3. Re:I don't know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! And even more, we should use this as an opportunity, not to destroy his life, but to make it better. He's obviously not doing to well as it is, both in school and ethically. This probably indicates a troubled home life. Use this as an opportunity to help him!

    4. Re:I don't know... by asylumx · · Score: 1

      He stole a key to the school and used it to enter unlawfully more than once. Does that count? (Hence the burlary charges)

      Also to the GGP, if his grades were so bad that he had to break in to fix them, where do you think his life is really going anyway? He's not going to get into a college with those marks and you don't get a "good" tech job without a degree.

    5. Re:I don't know... by PrimalChrome · · Score: 1

      Breaking and entering and burglary are not serious crimes? Glad to hear it....could you forward along your home address?

      I think everyone is in agreement that 38 years would be a nutty sentence. There is an almost zero chance that is what he will end up with, that is the MAXIMUM sentence for 50+ felony accounts if he were to serve all years sequentially. Typical slashdot sensationalism. This isn't some intelligent kid just changing a grade. Also keep in mind that these are only the crimes that he has been caught performing.

      That being said, why not put teh ev17 genius to work? Make him work for the state for the next four years....and if he pulls any more shenanigans, make him serve four in the pokey and deport him when he gets out. This would give ample time to see if he has learned his lesson.

    6. Re:I don't know... by KeelSpawn · · Score: 1

      He also harmed a dozen students. Think of the 12+ high-achieving students that got their grades boosted (or screwed over) for no apparent reason because this kid decided to change them. That could mean that some of kids lost their 1st choice colleges, appeal decisions, etc. Or worse - the genuinely hard-working kids had their spots taken from the other kids that had their grades mysteriously boosted up. If he only changed his own grades, I'd say expel him, don't let him walk the stage and no high school diploma. Community service for a year, then finish off high school where he left off. BUT, there were a dozen other INNOCENT students involved, and he screwed them over. Think of the students that aimed for UC Berkeley, UCLA, UC San Diego. I go to one of the UC's, and they're the most sought-after public universities in the West Coast. They're friggin competitive. This kid may have just ruined a dozen lives, possibly lives of kids with poor immigrant parents that worked their asses off so they could sent their own genuinely hardworking kids to a good college.

      --
      http://www.palmzone.net
    7. Re:I don't know... by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      I draw the line when a REAL crime is committed.

      Like the breaking and entering he is accused of as well?

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    8. Re:I don't know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But should his ENTIRE life really be completely ruined 60 is the new 40, you insensitive, ageist clod!
    9. Re:I don't know... by CyberData4 · · Score: 1

      Ohhh..he broke into his highschool... Like I said. Rapists and murders face less time. You really going to tell me that nearly 40 years is appropriate for this offense?

    10. Re:I don't know... by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      No, and he's not going to get convicted of all the charges, nor sentenced to anything near 38 years either. He's not going to "get his entire life ruined" beyond that which he brought upon himself. He *did* commit a "real" crime, multiple times, and a bunch of Slashdotters getting their panties in a bunch about the DA charging him doesn't change that.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    11. Re:I don't know... by PrimalChrome · · Score: 1

      He's not going to get into a college with those marks and you don't get a "good" tech job without a degree.

      sigh. And this is part of the problem. I am a principle in a tech company that does a few million a year, largely in billable hours. Out of my data employees, half lack degrees and two of those are my technical leads. Their skills are top notch, but just because they don't have the appropriate ribbons and medals, they obviously can't be performing their jobs to such a high standard.

      The sooner that people realize two things, the better the world will become...
      - 50% of people are below average, and should never consume the resources required to advance beyond secondary school. Many of those that are above average will attend with little thought as to the long term ramifications of their major.
      - While University is the bastion of high symbol manipulation, most students, but not all, are never taught to think for themselves, rather they are rewarded for rote memorization and regurgitation...which has to be beaten out of them if they are to succeed in any field that requires individual thought and motivation. Sadly, campus life overshadows education in the minds of most students today.

      Ah...and I never bothered to finish my degree. Somehow professional advancement got in the way. That being said, both of my boys will attend university in a number of years....yes, I am a hypocrite. grin.

    12. Re:I don't know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But in the end, no ones been harmed except himself.

      WRONG.

      Apparently you didn't read the post right above yours.

      " In addition to the burglary charge and the financial hit to fix the problems he caused, he hurt a lot of students. Consider this: For every one of the 13 kids who moved into the top 10% ranking, someone who had earned their spot had to leave. That student may not have been able to get into the college of his or her choice, and - far more importantly - may have missed out on substantial scholarship money. This kid wasn't just harming his high school through the added expense to audit records and security policies, he was hurting totally innocent fellow students."

    13. Re:I don't know... by CyberData4 · · Score: 1

      The point is, he shouldn't be "facing up to" 38 years to begin with. Period. But hey, he committed a "real" crime. I guess bittorrent downloaders should also serve 5 years for stealing thousands of dollars worth of copyrighted materials, right? And jaywalkers should get fucking probation... Like I said, give me a break. He changed his grades, big whoop.

    14. Re:I don't know... by jamesh · · Score: 1

      That's like saying an illegal downloader should get 5 years in jail. Cause you know....they're breaking teh lawz!

      I'd have no problem with someone being punished for crime, when they had repeatedly, after being warned repeatedly, continued to commit the crime. Even downloading stuff from the internet that they should have paid for but didn't.

      Assuming that the warning was sufficient and they understood the punishment, they've obviously decided for themselves that downloading the latest episode of (eg) 'Lost' without paying for it is worth spending prison time for.

      Now I think 5 years jail time would be stupid, I think a heap of weekends worth of community service would be more like it, but if the law was set at 5 years and the perpetrators knew it, then so be it.

      Does anyone really really want to download stuff from the internet that badly??? It's not like your constitutional rights are violated if you are unable to download stuff from the internet that you didn't pay for. Go for a walk instead.

    15. Re:I don't know... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Shit, I *DO* support that kid. "

      At what age cutoff do "kids" in your mind become adults and responsible for their actions?
      He is a legal adult, and was smart enough to plan his repeated crimes.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  33. Re:For those of you so against telecom immunity by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    ``I'm sure you want to see this guy prosecuted too, right?''

    Yes.

    <whining snipped>

    Anything else?

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  34. What's that saying that you guys ignore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah..

    If you DO the crime, you DO the time.

    ENOUGH SAID.

  35. Huh? by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

    How 'they' turned him into a criminal? He broke the law. Probably several laws. He is 18. By that age people should know right from wrong. Is it worth 38 years? Not even close. In fact I'd be in favor of probation rather than a jail sentence. However, 'they' didn't turn him into a criminal. He did.

  36. 38 yrs?! by zmooc · · Score: 1

    And this is where? North Korea?

    --
    0x or or snor perron?!
  37. Burn him at the stake!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he culd be one of dem identity thievers!!!!

  38. someone ratted him out? by roman_mir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ok, so the kid is a greedy one, changing all of his grades to As ;)

    But he is also not very socially bright, think about the other 12 kids for whome he changed the grades, someone was bound to talk. Or maybe a parent saw a dramatic grade change and called a teacher for whatever reason etc.

    You just don't include 12 more people into your 'crime'. It's not a secret anymore after that.

    Still, 38 years is just nuts. Make him pass the highschool exams again, put him into community service (with the other 12 kids by the way.) Also fine him for a few thousand bucks for the trouble and that should be that. His parents will take care of the rest of the punishment, I am certain.

    Anyway, Khaaaaaaan! I suppose.

    1. Re:someone ratted him out? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      I just thought about this for another moment, actually it is not clear whether all (or any) of the 12 kids whose grades were modified knew about it. After all this Khan faces a few kinds of identity theft, maybe some (all) of the 12 kids didn't actually know that their grades were changed until someone saw a transcript. That is stupid of Khan. It is also not clear that the grades were changed to better ones. He could change the grades to worse, that would be malicious, in that case I would recommend a few years in jail for fucking with other people's stuff (no sexual innuendo intended here, seriously.)

    2. Re:someone ratted him out? by mxs · · Score: 1

      put him into community service (with the other 12 kids by the way.) So you are assuming that those 12 others were complicit in the crime ? What if he just wanted to be "nice" to them ? Not their fault he's stupid.
    3. Re:someone ratted him out? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      read a comment that I left to myself just a few minutes after writing the first one. Some of the 12 may have known, some may not, specifically given the fact that there were charges of identity theft. It is not even clear that the grades of all/some of the 12 kids were changed for better ones...

  39. Re:For those of you so against telecom immunity by rtb61 · · Score: 1
    Well to date the possible prison terms are sheer speculation by a journalist wishing to sensationalise the story. With all the crimes the individual is accused of the actual damages have to be taken into account. For example stealing test papers and the answer, what is the real dollar value other than the cost of the paper, except of course if the school had to go to the expense of redoing the exam, which doesn't seem to have happened.

    Can you really 'steal' your own exam paper, beyond cheating of course, which is as yet not a criminal offence. There is of course hacking into a computer network, not real hacking of course as it was done via an obtained user name and password which has been blown out into some sort of identity theft, a some what exaggerated postulation.

    So it really all boils down to how good a lawyer he can afford and how anal the prosecutor is in seeking a publicity generating penalty.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  40. Re:For those of you so against telecom immunity by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

    First of all, I strongly doubt that these companies felt that they were "helping out after 9/11." This companies were told, by the NSA, that the government had an interest in installing secret equipment in switching stations, and rather than stand their ground, they allowed wiretapping equipment to be installed. Second of all, this kid did not commit a wiretapping offense, he tampered with public records (assuming he went to a public school), and he hijacked some else' equipment. The punishment does not fit the crime in the either case.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  41. Re:PUNISHMENT FITS THE CRIME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He won't get 38 years, it's the standard charge him with everything and add up the maximum sentences. Since "killing someone" is one crime of course on average you get less for it than the maximum penalties of 69 felonies added together.

    And he certainly deserves a serious penalty - not going into prison in high school and coming out when you are in your fifties though.

    The good news is that the school noticed, otherwise you have a dozen people getting into college and doing the same thing there. That's the "A student" accountant you want managing your money, or the "A student" engineer designing the bridge you drive to work over...

  42. Hmm....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Save Ferris!

  43. Re:For those of you so against telecom immunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and who are all such sticklers for prosecuting lawbreakers, I'm sure you want to see this guy prosecuted too, right?

    No moron, I want the legislature of the state that the kid lives in to pass a special law which not only provides complete amnesty for the kid, but also bans the justice system from ever bringing a case against him in the future if he ever breaks the law again by hacking. Also, I want that special law to give the governor of the state final say over what laws can be broken by the government and by private entities working on behalf of the government with no fear of judicial review.

    Basically, I want this kid to get everything that the telecoms and the Bush administration are getting. It's only fair.

  44. Public Schools? by FatSean · · Score: 1

    Run by state and local organizations, funded (for the non-coastal states) by redistribution of Federal Income Taxes...and the requirements that come with receipt of those funds.

    I'd say the school represents the government on all levels!

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:Public Schools? by sumdumass · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, that should be funded by "state" taxes. Very little federal money funds the public education systems of various states and that money is generally earmarked for specific purposes outside education like the school lunch and breakfast programs.

      When you look at the dollar amount spent on public education in any given state, the entire federal budget for education is generally a small in comparison of that. Take ohio for instance, It spends around 11-19 billion in primary and secondary education each year before any federal money is assessed. In comparison, the feds (NEA) only spent 38 billion on the same education. If that were divided by the 50 states, that's like 700 million or so per state and this isn't counting DC or outlying territories. When we look at the fact of some stated being poorer then others, needing more funding, it goes down even more. But for the majority of situations, federal funding is going to be only a small fraction of most every state's education funding.

      I will agree that the school represents the government but for different reasons. These reasons are that the government has put their faith behind the results and reporting of these schools to provide legitimacy to them. The federal government has an interest in a state's credential too. When someone undermines that by purposely presenting false information or altering information certified by the state, then there is a reason to be concerned. In essence, I see changing grades as being no different then fake IDs or impersonating a police officer to defraud someone.

    2. Re:Public Schools? by Karrde45 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How much of Ohio's 11-19 billion is spent on processing paperwork to receive the ~700 million in federal money? Approximately 9 years ago, one of the national high school debate topics was how to improve education in the US. A surprising number of teams advocated abolishing the national Dept. of education. Many of them cited situation where districts had to hire extra personnel in order to process all the paperwork ensuring that they were in compliance with federal regulations and requirements. The paperwork ate up a pretty good chunk of that federal money in most cases.

    3. Re:Public Schools? by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not sure about a figure but I suspect it would be significant because not only does the state have to do an accounting, but each district does as well.

      I read a report a while back and I can't find it to link to now, but it said much of the same things. It went on to break down the actual effectiveness of every federal dollar which was astonishing low. less then 50 cents on the dollar. And of that, half had to be spent in specific ways which was tied to some other program which means if the state didn't fund the program and operate it a certain way with federal monies, it locked them out of certain other funds and opertunities. The report might have been part of one of those debates, I don't remember where I saw it.

      My niece's school explained to us that if she ate breakfast at school instead of at home where it should be done at, that they would be eligible for some other funding related to class size and preschool opportunities for low income parents. They even sent applications home for the free lunch program and gave parents suggestions on how to qualify because a significant amount of federal funding was tied directly to that also. I wouldn't be surprised if they weren't right in suggesting the removal of the department of education.

    4. Re:Public Schools? by Lershac · · Score: 1

      right. but the true victims of the crime were not the school (govt) but were the other students whos hard work he imugned and devalued. Not the school.

      Still I say if he sits in jail for a year, and gets a couple of one on one interviews with the judge and seems to have learned something... let him off with time served and supervised probation.

      if the little turd pleads ng... bury him.

      --
      Chuck
  45. The only criminals are the ones running the school by Innominandum · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm at a loss for words. His misguided juvenile shenanigans could net him a longer sentence than rapists, murderers, pimps, drug dealers, etc. When I was a kid they would've hauled me into the office, given me a stern lecture, and encouraged me to use my skills in a productive & positive way.

    This sort of outrageous over-reaction & immoral litigiousness only results in disdain for the legal system, law, and public institutions.

  46. US justice system by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    Here is an illustration of what I meant in my earlier comment. Instead of having a law that specifies precisely what punishment corresponds to a common and unremarkable crime we have on one hand ridiculous pileup of multiple charges for the same actions, and on the other hand, without any doubt, attorney claiming that it's all total bullshit, parole slashing prison terms to nearly nothing, etc. Let the shouting match begin, and expect a completely random result that has nothing to do with severity of the crime, deterrence, common sense and least of all -- justice.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  47. I'm for appropriate punishment in both cases by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For the juvenile hacker, maybe community service plus a few months prison on probation.

    In case of the telecoms, it is important that lawbreaking is not legalized by the mere say-so of the government. Because this would seriously undermine all laws that are designed to protect the citizens from government harassment.
    The "helping in good faith" should count as mitigating circumstance, but not get them completely off the hook. Let's say fines for those reponsible, plus also a few months prison on probation.

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
    1. Re:I'm for appropriate punishment in both cases by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      That's the real reason some people want to have the Telecoms totally immunized:
      If they had to defend the charges in court, they would be entitled to present some facts as defense. If the DoJ assured them the actions were legal for example, that's a good reason to say anyone suing can't claim triple damages for gross negligence.
            The courts could easily impose only relatively trivial penalties on these companies, and accept a lot of excuses. After all, they were probably pressured by government agencies who said, in effect; "If you don't help us, you're helping the people who commissioned the hit on the WTC." or "If you don't help us, don't be surprised if the public thinks you're not real patriots, and maybe votes with their pocketbooks."
            But, the courts would then have the names of the people in government who did this, plus letters, e-mails, and possibly even recorded conversations. This whole Telecom immunity thing is not about protecting the companies, who are not really likely to face the kinds of penalties that would break them or even seriously inconvenience them, anymore than the kid in this story is really likely to get 38 years. Instead, it's about protecting some parts of the government from being implicated if those same companies are allowed their constitutional rights in presenting a fair legal defense.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  48. One of the comments posted to the story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is one of the comments on the newspaper story:

    He's NOT a hacker!
    Jun 19, 2008 08:21
    He's just lazy and stupid.

    First off, this idiot goes to the same high-school as me - Tesoro High School. The guy is a total loser who just wastes his time trying to act cool and trying to "party it up" cause his family is relatively well off.

    The "38 years in prison" is just a tagline. He *faces* that much time in prison because of the 69 seperate counts of felony charges, but he'll probably get a fine and probation and that's about it. (Well, that and getting blacklisted from the major schools that he had no shot of getting into.)

    Secondly, since when has installing a keylogger program on a computer been considered hacking? In which case, we're all "hackers" cause we installed software on our PC. He doesn't know the first thing about programming. He asked me to fix his spyware infested computer on repeated occasions. The guy would get others to do his work for him and pay them off. He even asked people to take the SATs for him! jeez!

    Lastly, he's a lazy idiot. He got caught AFTER he was denied admission to the UCs (yes, he still got rejected with his modified transcripts), when he tried to appeal the decision and have more transcripts sent out - that's when the counselor noticed the discrepency. If he had taken the time to study for the SATs instead, he'd be in by now, even with his terrible GPA.

    What a ridiculous world we live in.

    Amit

    1. Re:One of the comments posted to the story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since this came from an Anon internet comment here is a little corroboration attesting to the fact this was B&E-stolen passwords-spyware install instead of super smart kid-bored and better than his teachers-break into network just to do it.

      http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/06/17/state/n230024D29.DTL

      Relevant text:

      Prosecutors alleged that between January and May, Khan repeatedly broke into school after hours with a stolen master key. They said he used teachers' passwords to hack into computers and change his grades and test scores, often changing the Cs and Fs he received into As.

      He is also accused of changing the grades of 12 other students and installing spyware that would let him access the school computer from a remote location.

    2. Re:One of the comments posted to the story: by Sabz5150 · · Score: 1

      Khan... I'm laughing at the "superior intellect".

      --
      "Who modded this informative? Whoever it is must've been smokin' some of that martian pot!"
    3. Re:One of the comments posted to the story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wow, sounds like presidential material (at least judging from the current incumbent).

    4. Re:One of the comments posted to the story: by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      Nah. The administration is a little classier, paying the kid's way into Yale.

    5. Re:One of the comments posted to the story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is actually very believable, considering that it stated that he changed his Cs, Ds, and Fs to As, implying he had quite a few of them. "34 felony counts of altering public record" certainly is quite a few. I'm sorry, but someone who would have the ability to actually exploit and hack a school system could easily have gotten good enough grades in compsci and math courses to have gotten into a UC school from in state with substantial scholarships, too.

    6. Re:One of the comments posted to the story: by compro01 · · Score: 1

      You greatly overestimate the skill required. One could find the required tools and idiot-proof instructions to using them with 5 minutes on google.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    7. Re:One of the comments posted to the story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's ironic is that if he is truly talented, he doesn't need to get into a great school. He just needs to demonstrate what he is capable of and someone will give a "goats butt" about "gradegate" and hire him. Of course, he won't get to drive around with a cute little MIT bumper sticker etc; but I really don't think he cares.

    8. Re:One of the comments posted to the story: by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      >Not surprisingly, his parents (who have only recently immigrated to America) have decided not to post the $50,000 bail

      same high-school as me ... his family is relatively well off.

      I love it when people's silly assumptions are proven completely wrong.
    9. Re:One of the comments posted to the story: by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It must be true! If some AC says it on teh intarwebs, that's good enough for me. Perhaps you should look up the definition of "proven"?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re:One of the comments posted to the story: by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      Good point. But he gave the name of the school and signed his name, so it seems pretty easy to disprove if he was a clever troll. He is also "one of us". His story resonated with me because I was the similar kid who rich assholes - yes Salek Brodsky, that means you! - tried to cheat off of on A.P. exams and the like.

  49. tin foil hat alert by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 4, Funny

    incoming government rays... put on your tin foil hat... must*not*get*along*with*rest*of*the*world!!!!

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  50. Good! by ThorGod · · Score: 1

    Listen, kid, I went through college the old, honest way. I never cheated, unlike you, and of course my GPA wasn't that great, as a result. There were plenty of times where I could have cheated and I know that others did. It's simply very easy when they give take home tests and finals for groups of people to work on the same thing. They never got called on the carpet and I stayed very well away from anything that looked like that. (This is probably my main beef with engineers, btw.)

    But I graduated with my integrity intact. Which is obviously a metric ton more than you'll ever be able to say.

    So you got caught for doing a more high tech version of what I avoided all through college. 38 years might look like a lot, but considering what you came within arms reach of doing, it ought to be 80.

    --
    PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    1. Re:Good! by evil_aar0n · · Score: 1

      How quaint. "Honesty" & "integrity." In a society that gave the highest office to a drug using, military duty skipping, domestic spying president whose primary objective seems to be helping his war-profiteering and Big Oil buddies increase their already astronomical portfolios. /sarcasm

      For the record, I graduated without cheating, too, and know what you're talking about. It just strikes me that, for any kids paying attention, nowadays, cheating and adjusting the rules to fit your needs is the lesson they're getting. Those who play honestly are just schnooks.

      --
      Truth, Justice. Or the American Way.
    2. Re:Good! by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      So you're gonna raise your kids like that?

      I really hope my kid beats your kids ass.

    3. Re:Good! by evil_aar0n · · Score: 1

      Raise my kid like what? He's honest, just like I am. He's hard-working, probably more than I was, as a kid, and he doesn't cheat. Couldn't ask for a better child, if I say so, myself.

      You did catch the "sarcasm" in my message, right?

      As for a butt kicking, your kid is welcome to try. I s'pose I should mention mine's 23, for starters, and a two-time NY state wrestling championship qualifier (took 4th, before the division split). He gives me a run for my money, and I'm sure he'd welcome a challenge. I'm not as young as I used to be, you know... ;-)

      --
      Truth, Justice. Or the American Way.
  51. Sad by magamiako1 · · Score: 1

    I can't help but think to agree with some of the others here. He changed a few grades, big deal. How many cases have there been of teachers changing grades for students who provide them "special" favors? How many cases of misrepresented grades have gone through the public school system?

    The reality is, the kid probably did it because he was bored in school. This most certainly was the reason why I played around on my school's network back in the day. When you're an IT nerd in high school studying how firewalls work on your own time, and you're shoved into a class full of people who don't know the difference between Windows 95 and Windows 98 and can't type even 1/4th the speed you can--there are glaring flaws to be seen in this system.

    While what the kid did may be technically seen as "wrong", 38 years is a bit much. The school should look at programs to challenge students like this one, which may include smaller classrooms, more advanced materials to study, or even individualized instruction.

    Then they could have kept him out of their network.

  52. If they're public by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they're public, how can you steal them?

  53. Collegeboard...? by Zekasu · · Score: 1

    By installing a remote access program on the schools server Kahn was able to also change his AP scores, ...

    Correct me if I'm wrong, which is entirely possible, but doesn't Collegeboard, not the local school, take care of AP scores?
    1. Re:Collegeboard...? by ThorGod · · Score: 1

      Yep, you're right. Which makes his efforts on that end utterly pointless.

      --
      PS: I don't reply to ACs.
  54. Re:PUNISHMENT FITS THE CRIME by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    Well, as stated the 38 years is the maximum he can get, much like how the maximum for murder is generally life or execution.

    This sort of stuff tends to happen when you commit two dozen or so different felonies, each with a maximum sentence of up to a couple years. It only applies if he's found guilty on every count and the judge/jury assigns the maximum penalty for every crime. They don't normally do this, saving 'throwing the book' for worse cases than this.

    I figure he'll end up with 5-10 years and a hefty parole period after.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  55. Slippery Slope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you like to play a game?
    How about a nice game of Tic-Tac-Toe?
    Alright. Thermal Nuclear Warfare it is.

  56. Relax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and take some of that insanity-recognizing energy and try to figure out how many years he'll actually do. (Hint: it won't even be 21 years)

  57. 38 years? what kind of a country are you? by sajaki · · Score: 1

    38 years for this? /facepalm ok well i thought Usa was a civilised country, sorry for being so naive.

  58. Oh so brave you are by unassimilatible · · Score: 1

    Your argument is so compelling you had to post it anonymously and call names. I so I wish I were as smart as you. Why do Slashdotters have to always be so snotty with people who disagree with them? Keep on validating those no-social-skills IT stereotypes.

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
    1. Re:Oh so brave you are by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

      Apparently you're unaware of the magnitude of the crimes that you offer an apology for. I would not hesitate to describe them as treasonous, myself.

      Also, you're equating two things which are not remotely the same, which is very poor form for an argument.

      Quite frankly, you give the impression of being an idiot, or worse: someone who is deliberately ignorant of the principles involved in the subject at hand. On top of that, an Anonymous Coward can construct a better argument than you, and your response is---well, that's funny. I don't see you addressing his point at all...

      --
      Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
  59. 1 day your hacking grades the next day NORAD just by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 4, Funny

    1 day your hacking grades the next day NORAD just to play a game.

  60. But.... by deesine · · Score: 1

    That's the higher end of the punishment-scale for committing obscenity laws in other countries: so everything evens out, no worries there mate.

    --
    damaged by dogma
  61. retakes by smoker2 · · Score: 1

    Make him and the other 12 students retake the exams, and unless they all get A's give them jail time. If they do get A's, then a bit of community service will do.

  62. 1 year for being smart, 37 for being a smart ass by MrKaos · · Score: 1
    Chances are no-one would have even known that he had done it if he had only changed his own grades. Even if he did get busted I doubt the authorities would have cared much either - more likely admiration for being so smart. The problem was he had a point to prove, his point being that he is smarter than the system and that's dumb. The system doesn't care if you are smarter than it is - only if you broadcast you are smarter than the system to other people, which is what he did.

    And thats why he is facing 37 years more gaol (jail) than he may have otherwise. Smart is if he changes his own grades and said nothing, Smart Ass is if he changes other peoples grades, therefore he is facing 37 years gaol for being a smart ass.

    The moral of the story: No one likes a smart ass.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  63. A missed opportunity... by Guppy · · Score: 2, Funny

    I bet if he had instead changed some everyone's grades to "D-E-A-D-B-E-E-F" the judge would have just lold and put a "1337 Pwnage" into his permanent record instead.

  64. Re:PUNISHMENT FITS THE CRIME by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    yesterday, congress declared 'if the president says its ok, its lawful'. they also said that the government can break into your phoneline (tap it) and network connection and even though they ADMIT it was a crime, they give 'forgiveness' to the other party that committed the crime (the telcos and isps).

    the president and the telcos get off scott-free. major crimes were done by my government by breaking into systems that belong to business (the telcos). I do submit that they broke in as they already have 'black box' rooms and don't really NEED 'permission' to tap, not really, not in the technical sense.

    there seems to be no punishment and yet the loss is real and measurable (the loss of the notion of personal privacy; we just lost
    that, folks, in case you didn't realize it).

    but this kid broke into a SCHOOL system's computer and 'changed grades'. OH BOY - SEND THE ARMY, NAVY, MARINES!! sheesh.

    put it into perspective. who did the more damage?

    this kid should be punished, but proportionately.

    (I'll not say what I think should happen to those other guys I mentioned. use your imagination.)

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  65. Obviosly A Talented Kid by WebmasterNeal · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This kid was probably very bored in school (much like I was) and I think we can all remember how "locked down" those stupid high school computer networks are. Sometimes, the more you lock something down, the more the end user wants to get around road blocks. To bad they couldn't have used this kids skills to find vulnerabilities in the network or make something positive out of his knowledge.

    --
    "During My Service In The United States Congress, I Took The Initiative In Creating The Internet." -Al Gore
  66. Re:For those of you so against telecom immunity by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Okay, let me try to parse this one out.

    and who are all such sticklers for prosecuting lawbreakers, I'm sure you want to see this guy prosecuted too, right? Yes.

    but it is inconsistent to claim you are all so concerned about the law being followed when it is a corporation trying to help out after 9/11 When you say "help out" I assume you mean that time the telcos let the government illegally strip-mine all of our conversations with no judicial oversight whatsoever, just because someone in the intel service said "no, no, it's cool. You're fighting terrorists."

    Or did AT&T help a kitten out of a tree or something?

    but when it is some hacker who is a lot more like you nerds than AT&T happens to be, will you be consistent? I don't even know what that's suppsed to mean.

    After all, who else's grades did he snoop into? Twelve of his friends. Did you even read the article?

    For the record, I think it is grossly excessive, and sad that young people can get 25+ years for doing things similar to what I did in high school when most of it wasn't illegal then. Breaking and entering, burglary, and falsification of public records wasn't illegal when you were in school?

    I am for telecom immunity for companies that tried to help after 9/11 in good faith, and relied on the government's assurances that they would not face legal sanction. I'm sure you are.

    I'd imagine that this hacker got no such assurances from authorities before he broke in! He's not a hacker. He's a common criminal and burglar who managed to see someone's password. Don't make him out to be anything else.
  67. Re:Huh. by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 1

    While I don't condone his crimes, I will say (as someone who only recently finished his term in one of the state-run loony bins they call high schools) that there is precious little knowledge in the "studying" for anything high-school related.

    --
    "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
  68. Insert Realism Here by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 1

    He hasn't been tried yet. 38 years is the total of maximum sentences for each occurence of each charge. Why don't we wait until the trial has been held before we start to obsess about the excesses of the justice system. Then we can legitimately decry the outcome, either way.

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
  69. Re:Huh. by stainlesssteelpat · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hell if he has m4d 5k1775 they should put him to work instead.DARPA are having a wee shortage, so i'm told.

    --
    War is the statesman's game, the priest's delight, the lawyer's jest, the hired assassin's trade.- Shelley
  70. A for Effort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A for effort, F for capture.

  71. 69 felonies? I'll say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, come on... like the kid isn't saying, "Awright, man... sixty nine! Woot, and shit like that."

    Anyway, clearly this is another case for the need for open source governance, where the community decides the punishment.

  72. Re:For those of you so against telecom immunity by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

    The difference between those two sets of crimes is that one of them was of national scope and involves constitutional law.

    Also, your argument is flawed: few here are arguing that this kid should not be punished. Most people seem to agree with you that the severity of the punishment is excessive. Also, it has been recognized that the kid probably won't serve anywhere near that amount of time, if he serves any time at all.

    On the subject of the wiretapping, I hold that there is no "good faith" involved. Every citizen should know what's in the Bill of Rights. That a wiretapping program without judicial oversight is illegal is obvious---damn near self-evident. "Trying to help out" my ass. Even if you are so misguided as to believe that the government has any right to spy on its citizens, rest assured that the telecoms corporations were not so deluded. The only legal argument they have to stand on is the Nuremberg Defense.

    Question: If you support telecom immunity, do you then also support the public trial and criminal conviction of the elected and appointed officials responsible for the illegal actions?

    --
    Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
  73. It's a Blazing Saddles reference. by attemptedgoalie · · Score: 1


    "Rape, murder, arson and rape."

    "You said rape twice."

    "I like rape."

    --
    My mom says I'm cool.
  74. MOD UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This kid isn't a genius. He's not talented. He isn't some sort of super child that did this because he was bored in school. He's a stupid script kiddie. He downloaded a keylogger from the internet then broke into the school office and installed it. What a computer wiz. The kid's a douche and this sentence probably just saves the court some time down the road. And he won't even get 38 years anyway so quit whining about how long that is.

  75. 38 years, if you are a moron by Shihar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He is facing "up to" 38 years. That means that if you take all of the charges against him, and he gets the max prison term for all of them, he will be in jail for 38 years. The chances of that happening are zero. What is going to happen is that if the evidence against him is good enough where he (his lawyers) think that he can't win, he will just make a plea deal with the prosecutors. If he serves any time after pleading guilty and making a plea deal, it will likely be under a year. In all likelihood he will just get put on probation for a few years. Probation sucks, but it beats prison... and well, it is supposed to suck. It is a punishment, and punishments tend to suck.

    1. Re:38 years, if you are a moron by instarx · · Score: 1

      If he serves any time after pleading guilty and making a plea deal, it will likely be under a year. In all likelihood he will just get put on probation for a few years.

      Except you are forgetting he is not a citizen. Even one felony will get you deported these days. He may never spend a day in jail after his trial, but there isn't a chance in hell the INS is going to let him stay in this country.
  76. Good thing he didn't rape or assault anyone. by copponex · · Score: 1

    Then he'd be on parole or even jailed for two years. Much better to serve five for messing with an insecure computer system.

  77. Bueller? Bueller? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What was he trying to do, go to a Cubs game and sing in a Dearborn St. street parade?

  78. 38 years??? Um no by JimboFBX · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think some of you are misunderstanding how the legal system works. He faces 38 years in prison. Thats a maximum, just like you can face a maximum of 6 months in jail for rather meager crimes that you typically just pay a fine for. Most likely the judge will sentence him to just a couple of years and if the kid is good he'll get out in a matter of months at his parole hearing. He might also get one of those screwball "Can't use the Internet" sentencing or such in exchange for reduced time. He's 18 years old, but in this case they'll still treat him like he's a kid.

  79. Why, why, why?!?!?!!? by stubear · · Score: 2

    Jesus fucking christ people, why is it whenever a story like this comes out everyone jumps on the statutory MAXIMUMS. The kid committed *69* felony counts and it is possible, though highly unlikely, that the MAXIMUM jail time he could face for ALL these charges is 38 years. If you think hackers should face NO penalties for their actions then grow a pair, step on the sop box and say so but don't keep harping on statutory MAXIMUMS as if they are evil incarnate that you must rid the world of.

    1. Re:Why, why, why?!?!?!!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus fucking christ people, why is it whenever a story like this comes out everyone jumps on the statutory MAXIMUMS.
      Possibly because that's what prosecutors almost invariably press for, unless they get a plea bargain?

      (BTW, protip: in English we normally mark questions with a question mark, and we normally capitalise names and titles like "Christ".)

  80. Mindset by v(*_*)vvvv · · Score: 1

    Think about the criminal mentality here... looking over someone's shoulder vs hacking into the teacher's computer... They are both means to the same end, and are both opportunities taken with similar intent. If we are to punish "evil" then these two are equal. The only difference is one kid was more efficient at it, thought outside the box, had a bigger vision, and accomplished a bigger goal.

    He got caught, sure, but maybe he needs practice? He gets an A in my book.

    Btw this reminds me of a great Southpark episode. Ya, how about think about how we can we help these childred!?

  81. Turning a mistake into a habit. by copponex · · Score: 1

    Let's assume this kid didn't realize the gravity of his actions. He's 18, after all. As a society, we can take someone with obvious talent, send them to a full year of constant psychiatric care and put him on parole for two years. Punish him by putting him on house arrest for six months without access to a computer.

    The benefit for the perpetrator is that they get a real chance at not becoming part of the revolving door of our prison system. The benefit for society is you take someone on the wrong track, make him a productive member of society instead of another burden.

    And if he violates the law while on parole, then you stick him in jail for a year. But don't give him more time that someone who commits violent acts. That's just fucking stupid.

  82. Re:Typical Shalshdot modding by Drakonik · · Score: 1

    But it's not censorship. We mods simply use the system in place to express our opinion that you are either a troll or making a redundant post, or something along those lines.

    Your post is still on Slashdot servers and is still visible, unless someone chooses to browse at something above -1, which is the fault of that lone user.

  83. Grades and Test Answers are PUBLIC record? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, Grades and Test Answer keys are considered "Public Record"? Heck, why can't students request this public record and get A's that way? I don't agree with doing this, but if this case goes through it sets the precedent that school documents are public record and thus accessible to anyone. Don't they realize this?

  84. Re:Oh so sensitive you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gosh, I'm really sorry to hurt your feelings there, Cindy Lou. You should probably step away from computer for awhile, and give yourself a little time to recover from the brutal name-calling that I callously inflicted on you. Go put on some soothing ambient music and brew yourself some camomile tea to calm yourself. Maybe even take one or two of those xanax pills you were prescribed in order to deal with this kind of "difficult" situation.

    And if you want to pop open that book of daily affirmations that your grandma gave to you after you were emotionally devastated by failing to make the cheerleading squad in high school? Well, you go right ahead, hon.

  85. Harsh? by vladsinger · · Score: 1

    Something rather similar happened at my school recently. A group of high achieving though bored students installed a key logger on an administrator's computer and obtained passwords. They raised some of their grades and read private emails, and were finally caught when attempting to break into school to retrieve the device. However, despite a great deal of publicity and multiple felony charges for some (not 69 though), none of them were actually jailed - though all were kicked out of school (including one who had already graduated and been accepted to college).

  86. little 'creep'? by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    I'm glad this little creep learned early

    Please, have a little perspective. Do not blow this situation out of proportion. The two kids who did Columbine were "creeps"...this kid was impetuous, smart, and immature.

    As others have said, he should be punished. Community service, a period of time w/o a computer, but whatever they do, don't put him in prison. And make sure he can clear his record in 3 or 5 years. Sounds like the perfect candidate for a 'first time offender program'

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  87. But you learned something right? by FatSean · · Score: 1

    You learned that the government and/or school does not have proper forgery-detection policies in their process.

    Since the only way to expose the flaws in such a process is to show how the process can harm innocent participants, this is simply a necessary evil.

    --
    Blar.
  88. Gulp Gulp Gulp by FatSean · · Score: 1

    How does the cock of authority feel slithering down your willing throat?

    Don't be a pussy, you need to work at retaining your rights and liberties. Too many people want to take them away from you for their own gain.

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:Gulp Gulp Gulp by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whoah, subtle ;)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
  89. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very interesting - How did he get access to install the remote access program. So who got fired for lax security?

  90. " Lastly, he's a lazy idiot." - great defence? by pbhj · · Score: 0

    That sounds like the response of an intelligent person. Or perhaps the _defence_ of a very intelligent person who is already learning to be a criminal mastermind (either posting from prison or influencing those on the outside to do it for him).

    ?

  91. I just realized something... by v(*_*)vvvv · · Score: 1

    Was this kid ever *taught* he was going to get 38 years if he hacked into the school's computers? Shouldn't they be teaching *that* at school? The parents should sue for improper education.

    You can't assume kids know right from wrong. It must be taught. And what are schools for?

    There is a difference between being naughty and social suicide. He knows now, but this could have been prevented!

  92. Another fine example by LilGuy · · Score: 1

    Of what happens when the law becomes a religion. People don't even stop to take a look at the reasons why they'd be willing to lock someone up for 38 years. The law says it's wrong therefore no thought is necessary when doling out the punishment.

    It's time this country took a good hard look at the three branches of government and started weeding out the garbage that does not work. Unfortunately it's too late for so many, but there is still time enough for many more.

    --

    You're nothing; like me.
  93. Not a threat to society? by pbhj · · Score: 1

    Yes there must be consequences for his actions. But YEARS in jail? This kid isn't really a "threat" to society or someone who needs to be, what's the word they like to use now? - rehabilitated... It's just a dumb kid who needs to be taught a lesson. 38 years, or 10, or even 1 will probably break him and ensure that society gains yet another underachieving, useless supermarket bagger (if that). I couldn't really care less about him adjusting his own grades per se. Where he's affecting society is that if he hadn't been caught he could well have ruined several other peoples lives - either winning scholarships which others deserved or by adjusting down the grades of those who now wouldn't get the education and life path they worked hard for.


    Jail time sounds about right, but not more than a year and provided he gets to continue study inside.

  94. Does grade-hack violate God's Law? by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    It possibly runs afoul of...

    Exodus 20:15 and 20:17

    20:15 U no taek stuffs for free if not getz for free.
    ...
    20:17 U no wantz neibor stuff! No wief, no gurlz, no menz, no animulz, NO BUKKITZ! DEY NOT UR BUKKITZ, K? dey da LOLrus' bukkits.
    After 68 years in prison, how many eons in hell will he get for this?
    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  95. I burned my brand new school gym down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    N all I got was a week of STS and a bunch of pissd off jocks! What a world we live in... Deport that kid! hehehehehe jk

  96. I gotta say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did the same type of stuff when I was in High School. Granted we never changed grades....but I did delete most of the school's users....

    http://www.jimbastard.net/Jim_deletes_the_tenth_grade.html

  97. Re:The name by Kwesadilo · · Score: 1

    Kahn is Hebrew and is a name most often possessed by Jews. Khan is of mixed origin and is most commonly seen in Indians. Some of those people could accurately be described as brown skinned, but neither Israel nor India is widely known for terrorism, whatever you personally may think about the policies of those countries.

    Also, he hasn't been sentenced yet. Legal proceedings have barely begun, as far as I can tell.

    --
    This space reserved for administrative use.
  98. Re:1 year for being smart, 37 for being a smart as by canajin56 · · Score: 1

    He stole a key and broke into the school after hours. First time, was to install a keylogger. Second time was to use the password he stole to log in as an administrator so he could access the mark system. Which of those two things required any smarts at all. Did he write the keylogger? No, he bought it. Did he hack the marking system? No, he had the password and it was easy to use. He got busted not because of the other students, but because he changed his AP marks. But those marks are sent TO the school, not FROM the school. So his transcript didn't match. You know, when the college of his dreams called his school to ask why this kid with straight A's flunked his AP tests, and the highschool said "Huh? He got 100% on his AP tests..."

    --
    ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
  99. This is what is wrong with the system by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We look at the crime, but not at the intention behind it. If we did, the same punishment should be meted out for someone who is caught cheating on his tests. The intended result is the same: Getting a grade he didn't earn the "legal" way.

    Why is hacking a computer to fudge the grade worse than using cheat sheets? Why isn't anyone who cribbed his doctor thesis facing 40ish years in prison (which is, IMO, a worse offense than cheating with your grades, we're talking about a thesis that allows you to bear a title, which does hold a lot of meaning in some countries)?

    Look at the crime, not at the way it was committed.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:This is what is wrong with the system by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Wait, what? He changed his failing grades to excellent grades. How is that any worse than cheating on a Ph.D? In America, I think the difference between someone with a masters and a doctorate is much less than between a kid with a high school diploma and one so stupid they failed out.

  100. NOT facing 38 years! by overunderunderdone · · Score: 1

    Despite the hype he is NOT facing 38 years in prison. 38 years is just the number you get if you add up the sentences for each of the crimes. (And who's fault is it that the prosecutors have that many crimes to add up?).

    If he is found guilty of all those crimes he will serve CONCURRENT sentences for them. SO if he was up for 38 felonies which each had a 1 year sentence he would serve all those 38 years with just one actual year in prison. That's not exactly how it works out of course. He's up for 69 felonies and some of the felonies have longer sentences than the others, so the practical result is he'll serve time for the single most serious crime he committed. If it goes to trial he's not even likely to face all those charges, the prosecutors will focus on the handful of most serious and easiest to prove charges and drop the others if only to avoid muddying the waters at trial.

    CONSECUTIVE sentencing is theoretically possible, it's mandated for some serious crimes (not the case here) and can be imposed by the judge at his discretion given the gravity and circumstances of the crime. Spectacularly unlikely here, and probably overturned by a more sane appeals court if it was imposed.

    AT WORST I suppose if the judge felt that the resulting concurrent sentence wasn't long enough he could tack on one of the sentences as a consecutive sentence at the end. So say the kid gets the maximum 3 years for 2nd degree burglary as the longest of his concurrent sentences but the judge decides that's too lenient so he makes the identity theft sentence to run consecutively to add another 18 months. Even this type of scenario doesn't seem very likely, it's just as likely the judge decides he's basically a good kid, a good candidate for rehabilitation and mitigates his sentence so he only serves time on one of the lesser charges.

  101. Impostor! by l00sr · · Score: 1

    I knew that Stephen Hawking was a phony hacker all along!

  102. Somebody failed that kid.... by foniksonik · · Score: 1

    Parents, teachers... not enough info to say whom, but someone failed him...

    We shouldn't be asking whether 38 years is too long, too harsh OR even if what he did is a crime... we should be asking WHY this kid felt the need to do this.

    I suspect that he felt cheated. He's probably pretty intelligent and yet for whatever reason (lack of english skills, poor home environment... maybe just the fact that he recently immigrated and there are just so many extra obstacles in his way) he was not able to make good grades.

    It sounds like he needed a tutor or some additional after school instruction but his parents were too proud to request it (or he was too proud to accept it) and as a consequence he didn't have enough quality time to devote to his studies.

    Just as likely he was used to doing this in whatever country he came from and did not believe he would be caught, so didn't spend any time studying as he planned to simply change the grades later, like he did the other 3 years before moving to the US.

    Really the whole story is just sad.

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    1. Re:Somebody failed that kid.... by rossz · · Score: 1

      How very new age, "we must consider the _feelings_ of the criminals." Fuck that. Read the story, he isn't just some kid who remotely hacked the school system. He is also being charged with breaking and entering as he entered the school off hours to access the systems physically.

      It's very typical for news stories to list the total maximum penalty to sensationalize the story. He'll probably not see a single day of prison.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    2. Re:Somebody failed that kid.... by Shados · · Score: 1

      And yet there's a lot of people who are probably worse off than him who work their ass off, and either accept their failures or succeed anyway. Being screwed isn't an excuse to go around screwing others.

      fact is, people who have it easy in the world are a minority. An insignificant one.

    3. Re:Somebody failed that kid.... by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      If he was too proud to accept a tutor, he was asking for failure. Perhaps they never meant the 7 deadly sins literally, but being to proud to ask for help is academic suicide.

    4. Re:Somebody failed that kid.... by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      SO rather we'll give him excuses to commit further crimes and send him somewhere he can learn how to be a REAL criminal?

      It's a downward spiral when you take a smart kid and remove him from society so that the only choice left for him is to seek his fortune outside of accepted societal pathways. A low intelligence person may never be able to do much more than struggle... but a kid like this will just seek new ways to beat the system without getting caught.... leading to more exploits.. and yes he'll get caught again eventually but how much damage will he cause in between.

      Better to harness him with hard work and challenging goals - with a clear reward waiting for him at the end of it.

      I'd rather see a kid like this have to go into the military than to send him to prison. In fact I think any kid (male or female) should be enlisted for 4 years service in lieu of conviction for a crime like this (non-violent). If they are under age, they should have to go to a military run school and then serve 2 years. They would all have an option to enroll in University after with deferred payment or with a scholarship if they do well enough.

      Violent criminals of this age need to go to a rehab clinic where they can get counseling... they learned violence from somewhere and need to be rehabilitated to society before we can trust them in any scenario.

      BTW new age typically means giving hugs and positive verbal comments.... and seeking answers in crystals or zen meditation... I advocate a much tougher solution... with the burden on society to fix the problems we've allowed to happen, through poverty, lack of opportunity and general neglect.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  103. Re:1 day your hacking grades the next day NORAD ju by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

    If you want to play games, wouldn't that be Norad II and Norad III?

  104. Hm. by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

    I'd love to see the list of the 69 felonies he violated... because I'm sure more than half of them are repeats of another one. He deserves some type of prison sentence in my opinion... just not 30+ years. It's not like he killed anyone.

    --
    "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
    1. Re:Hm. by Shados · · Score: 1

      I'm fuzzy about the details, and while this isn't a murder, it can have quite significant impact... Grades do affect your future... if you're at the top, and people below you cheat, whatever... but if you're borderline, working your ass off, and you'll JUST make it in the college/program you want, and 10 people cheat and get ahead of you, they just ruinned it for you. Sure, you're still alive, but for a select few that may mean trashing their dreams and going toward another path.

      Add that a lot more people who commit murders get caught than people who do stuff like this, and you need to make an example out of them, so the risk isn't worth it. Open the pandora's box and the education system, as shitty as it already is, will make the patent system look great.

  105. Online grades are surprising by giminy · · Score: 1

    My mother teaches in a high school, and was talking about their new online grading system. She has to submit grades via the web service, and students are able to log in to the same web interface to read their grades. I asked my mother if the school kept other documentation of student grades (for example, if she had to turn in a grade book at the end of the year so that the university could compare the online version to her paper version). The answer was no. The high school relies completely on the online system for determining grades. This is accessible via the internet. The software is called Genesis Passport. Not a lot of information is available about it online, but I have to wonder if the thing could possibly be secure. I kind of doubt it, but what do I know, I'm only a professional security researcher and pen-tester...

    --
    The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
  106. Sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the school systems fault, the only way to improve grades after you get them is through hacking. Why don't we allow people to attempt to better their grades? Why do we cling to the "You screwed up your first attempt so now you will forever be no more then a C"

    I personally passed my introductory mechanics class with the lowest passed grade. I now have A's in seven more advanced classes, and have actually had to explain certain concepts of relativity and electrodynamics to my old mechanics teacher, but when I'm done, I'll still be a rocky in mechanics because I had one bad exam. And theres nothing I can do to change that, except drop out, change my name and start the entire education over abroad. Hows that for logic?

  107. Penalty if this was not a computer crime? by giminy · · Score: 1

    Question: What would the penalty be if this was not a computer crime? Suppose he broke into the school's office and changed the grades records for several students?

    One count of breaking and entering, and 34 counts of altering a public record? Would these even be federal crimes?

    --
    The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
    1. Re:Penalty if this was not a computer crime? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Wait.. grades are considered a public record now? WTF. In most states, your grades are private and personal.

      He also altered the grades of 12 other students. School officials allege that Khan also emailed copies of tests and answer keys to his friends.

      It seems there are 12 or so friends who should be in jail with him too, for each being a conspirator and accessory to their share of those 69 felonies.

      If the friends accepted 'grade alterations' and 'test information' from him, they clearly knew that he was committing the crime of stealing the materials.

      And yet, did they report it? No.. they tried to take advantage of it, by accepting the fruit of the student's crimes for their own personal gain.

  108. B. Nicholson by __aazdqt2542 · · Score: 1

    Khan's a regular Bart Simpson. Lucky for his parents his problems are easily solved. Somebody should tell his father to allow his son to kiss his face more. Or better yet, wipe the dad's face with something absorbent of the face grease paternal pheromone like chewing gum, and then let Khan chew the gum. About 150 mg p.o. will do the trick. 38 years? For a pheromone deficiency so easily remedied? I think not. A slap on the backside to stimulate lacrimation (with attendant pheromone receptor proteins dissolved in the tears) and a tiny squirt of the pheromone and the kid will be good as new. Don't buy this scenario? Go to Pub Med search Nicholson AND pheromone.

  109. Gun advocate response... by Firethorn · · Score: 3, Informative

    Warning: I am NOT a lawyer. I am just a self defense advocate and gun collector who has read multiple state laws on self defense and firearm laws.

    It really depends on your state and jurisdiction, even in the USA.

    It varies. Today, many states have an automatic 'fear for life/SBH' for an intruder in your house. In Texas, during hours of darkness, felony theft on your property may be responded to by deadly force. If they're in your house, you may respond with deadly force at any time.

    This is varied a bit in that some liberal cities within the state don't like that, and aren't particularly caring if they follow the law - you get a fair number of self defense cases that they'll push all the way to court, even knowing it doesn't have a snowball's chance. Heck, look back at texas and the incidents in one county where the police entered bars and arrested patrons for public drunkeness. No fights, no noise complaints. Premeditated raid to do this. Their stated goal was to reduce drunk driving - yet they arrested even people who had rooms in the attached hotel.

    Thus, I figure anything but the most blatant act of self defense will cost over $30k, possibly quite a bit more.

    In my town - somebody breaks in and I shoot them. Likely result: A pat on the back.
    Texas rural - same deal
    Texas, Dallas - some runaround.
    Lincoln or Omaha, NE - probably a few days in jail until they find that they don't have any real evidence that it wasn't self defense.
    In Chicago or DC - murder and wrongful death charges, showy trial leading to aquital. After tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars of lawyers bills. Or they'll drop charges after holding me in jail for six months without bail.

    Now, don't get me wrong. I am a serious advocate of self defense, concealed carry, and all. By the same token - taking a human life is serious. Therefore I don't mind if somebody who has to drop the hammer on an intruder is arrested. What I DO want is a thorough investigation followed by a quick release when it's determined to be self defense.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:Gun advocate response... by Nutria · · Score: 1

      It varies. Today, many states have an automatic 'fear for life/SBH' for an intruder in your house. In Texas, during hours of darkness, felony theft on your property may be responded to by deadly force. If they're in your house, you may respond with deadly force at any time.

      What does the amount of ambient natural light have to do with whether someone breaks into your home or not?

      In Louisiana, if someone breaks or pushes their way into your home or car, you are fully justified in shooting them. There will, of course, be a police investigation, but that's just to ensure that the person you shot really is a Bad Guy, and not your girlfriend's ex-boyfriend.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    2. Re:Gun advocate response... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what happened btw with that whole thing of the cops arresting people in the hotel bar for drunkeness? Cause that was completely nuts, and has been kinda a disincentive for visiting. Was it dropped in the end?

    3. Re:Gun advocate response... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      What does the amount of ambient natural light have to do with whether someone breaks into your home or not?

      Nothing. In texas, though, if somebody tries to steal your car(for example) at night you're allowed to use lethal force - if it's during the day you can't.

      Don't ask me the logic - Ask the texas legislatures that passed it.

      The closest I can think of is that Texas, of the time of the passing of the law, had a real issue with theft - maybe not the rate, but the seriousness of it. Insurance was rare back then, and people depended on their equipment and cattle to survive. It could literally cost somebody their life if their cattle was stolen*. Now, on the other hand, if something is stolen during the day, and you witness it, you can identify the perpetrator. During the night, not so much (laws predate extensive artificial lighting). Thus the line.

      Compared to the AWB, it's downright logical. ;)

      *Thus the extremely harsh penalties you'll see in the midwest for cattle theft.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  110. Meanwhile in sweden by BlueParrot · · Score: 1

    A man got a prison sentence of 10 years for planned murder.

    Yes, I know, different cultures, different system, but something somewhere is horribly broken (No, I'm not talking about the School's network setup ).

  111. And they wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And DARPA/USAF wonder where all our best and brightest are going...

  112. Re:Well, this time we are safe by HappySmileMan · · Score: 1

    Yeah, thank god somebody finally did it. OH WAIT, it's been done already, many times

  113. smart cheaters? by zelik · · Score: 1

    Sadly, there are people out there who have gotten away with changing grades and they're probably patting themselves on the back for their more subtle and successful efforts. When I was in HS, our school was VERY competitive, one of the top schools in CA. Full of nerds, literally. AP test? The question wasn't passing, it was whether you can get a 4 vs a 5. Anyway, the funny thing is..........A LOT of people cheated. Sure, maybe they didn't alter grades (though they would have tried if they could) they cheated in every which way possible from stealing answer keys from the school to hiding textbooks in the bathroom for "emergency studying" during "bathroom breaks" and hiring people for taking SATs. It was a joke. I'm serious. The saying went "the smart cheated because they are smart enough to figure out how." Sad.

  114. Whetre's the tag? by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 1

    KAAAAAAAAHN!

  115. Outing yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "My bad."

    Guess you'll remember to check that "post anonymously" box next time, huh?

  116. It is a disproportionate punishment. by StarKruzr · · Score: 1, Insightful

    He really did 38 years worth of damage to society by hacking a high school? Really? Whom did he hurt?

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:It is a disproportionate punishment. by u38cg · · Score: 1

      The 38 years is just the sum of the terms for the various offences he's been charged with. Presumably any sane court will give him a swift kick up the backside and send him on his way.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    2. Re:It is a disproportionate punishment. by jeiler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      American criminal jurisprudence is not intended to be equitable, but punitive--it is civil courts, not criminal courts, that deal with issues of equity. And breaking and entering is a lot more severe than "hacking a high school."

      If you're non-American, there's certainly reason to understand why you might not understand the distinction (though I'll bet a dollar to a stale doughnut that whatever country you come from has an almost identical system). And if you are American, perhaps Civics class was not the most propitious time to practice recto-cranial insertion.

      --

      If you haven't been down-modded lately, you aren't trying.

      Sacred cows make the best hamburger.

    3. Re:It is a disproportionate punishment. by k3r3nsky'sr3v3ng3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whom did he hurt? He hurt, or at least tried to hurt, every other applicant to the scholarships he applied to. In addition, had he been accepted, the college would have been hurt because he would have been a waste of scholarship funding. These grades aren't trivial;if his hacked grades beat out someone, it would cost them dearly, seeing that paying for college requires a second mortgage (aka. a student loan), thats if your parents don't have bad credit. In that case, the person his hacked grades beat would be denied a chance at attending a good college entirely.
      --
      "We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security." Dwight Eisenhower
    4. Re:It is a disproportionate punishment. by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      Punishment fits the crime. You can't put someone in jail for 89 years for spitting on the sidewalk, no matter what laws you write. They'll be struck down as cruel and unusual punishment due to the fact that said punishment grossly outweighs the severity of the crime.

      5 years, tops. 38? Absolutely ludicrous, especially when those convicted of murder can get off with less than that. I think we can both degree there is a shocking degree of difference between ending someone's life and installing a keylogger on an administrative computer and "haxing" them.

    5. Re:It is a disproportionate punishment. by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      And is this worth 38 years? When he murders or rapes someone, then we can discuss 38 years. Changing a few grades, throwing some scholarships into doubt? Hell, even identity theft is punished less harshly than 38 years.

      All the same, the 38 years thing is an inflammatory point. A few years of punishment, sure. At least more than a fine, but less than what would effectively be life imprisonment. Let's face it; this kid is a douche, but not so much a douche that I'm willing to spend potentially hundreds of thousands or millions of tax payer's dollars on keeping him locked up. That, I feel, would be an even more egregious crime on society.

  117. Hasn't hurt anyone?? by spineboy · · Score: 1, Troll

    By giving himself all A's, he effectively stole all the hard earned hours of study from those who honestly earned it. Just like stealing money. He will also steal chances that other students might have of getting into their choice of university.

    He could have ruined the future lives of many other students. What if you didn't get into a good college because of grade inflation, etc. Then don't get into med school - that can be a serious loss.

    If you break into someones house and get caught then no one is hurt, or if you shoot at someone, and miss no one is hurt either.

    38 years is harsh, maybe the kid should spend 4 years in jail, to offset the years other kids spent studying their books.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:Hasn't hurt anyone?? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "By giving himself all A's, he effectively stole all the hard earned hours of study from those who honestly earned it. Just like stealing money. He will also steal chances that other students might have of getting into their choice of university."

      No..it showed he was smart enough to manipulate the system to his advantage...something that will take you far in the real world.

      Remember how funny it was to hear how Capt. Kirk 'solved' the Kobayashi Maru in the Star Trek movie? This is just the same thing....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Hasn't hurt anyone?? by tftp · · Score: 1
      By giving himself all A's, he effectively stole all the hard earned hours of study from those who honestly earned it.

      I don't get it. The other "A" students still have their A's, don't they? Or, imagine that this kid was just studying hard and getting his A's honestly - would that be also "theft" from his peers?

      Just like stealing money

      No; if he steals money then the money is not in victim's wallet any more. This crime is like photocopying someone's else money - doesn't hurt the "victim" and places you into a potentially illegal situation.

      He will also steal chances that other students might have of getting into their choice of university

      There are many universities, his "grade inflation" is a drop in a sea of graduates. Also, if a university can't tell a difference between an idiot with good grades and a genius with good grades then probably only an idiot would want to apply there. My own university, upon seeing my school grades, only allowed me to skip two lesser exams (language and something else, equally irrelevant) provided that I pass the mandatory exams (math and physics.) The admission was based on the results of exams, and not just on school grades. But it wasn't in the USA, I am unfamiliar with practices here.

      38 years is harsh, maybe the kid should spend 4 years in jail, to offset the years other kids spent studying their books.

      I completely agree with your numbers. But my reasons are different. I don't believe he caused any harm to anyone except himself. I would put him in jail just for breaking the law, and since he appears to be such an abhorrent personality I wouldn't be able to think of any reasons to reduce the guilt.

    3. Re:Hasn't hurt anyone?? by k3r3nsky'sr3v3ng3 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Personally, I'm getting ready to apply for scholarships and quite frankly, the thought of losing out to some asshole who just hacked his grades makes my blood boil. Frankly, I wouldn't really care if he was thrown in prison; but thats for a judge and jury to decide.

      --
      "We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security." Dwight Eisenhower
    4. Re:Hasn't hurt anyone?? by spineboy · · Score: 1

      Let's pretend that your are up for Phi Beta Kappa, or class valedictorian, and this putz hacks his grades to get enough A's to take that away from you and win the award. Suddenly your hard earned A's become less valuable, and you lost the award to someone who stole it.

      Another example - what if you bought a bunch valuable original collectors items and want to sell them on Ebay for $100 each. Now someone else has made a bunch of cheap knock offs and few people can tell the difference. Now your item isn't worth as much, since the impostor will undercut your price (say $60), and you won't be able to get as much for your real item.

      Now what do you think.

      --
      ..........FULL STOP.
    5. Re:Hasn't hurt anyone?? by tftp · · Score: 1

      Let's pretend that your are up for Phi Beta Kappa, or class valedictorian, and this putz hacks his grades to get enough A's to take that away from you and win the award. Suddenly your hard earned A's become less valuable, and you lost the award to someone who stole it.

      This is an extreme and impossible to conceal case. You most likely know your grades, and grades of your competitors. The space at the top of Olympus is small, so you know who is who, and when some unknown guy suddenly shows up amidst local geniuses it will be instantly noticed, and the offended people will cry for blood (or at least for reexamination of papers.)

      The trick to get away with such a forgery is to tweak the grades very carefully, so that nobody has any reason to look into the details. That's how this guy did it, and nobody noticed anything until he himself was stupid enough to attract attention.

      Another example - what if you bought a bunch valuable original collectors items and want to sell them on Ebay for $100 each. Now someone else has made a bunch of cheap knock offs and few people can tell the difference. Now your item isn't worth as much

      This is true, but only in a very small market. The educational market is anything but small. If I sell quality blank DVDs, and thousands of other sellers sell quality blank DVDs, it won't matter a bit that one guy somewhere sells fake DVDs for less, pretending that they are just as good. It happens all the time, with some people selling genuine software and with other people selling pirated fakes. So what? Some people will buy from him, but that's a drop in an ocean; if one out of thousands of your honest competitors catches flu then the balance tilts the other way. You shouldn't be afraid of competition *that much* :-)

      There is always someone who competes "unfairly", whatever that means in your case. You study all night for an exam when someone else just hastily prepares a crib sheet, and you get a lower score - what do you do then? Nothing; just keep living, and focus on what really matters (school grades aren't it.) Cheaters won't get far with their stolen skills. And if they do, maybe the course wasn't that important to your trade and maybe you should have cheated also. In my days in university I had courses that are essential (like linear electric circuits) and courses that are utter garbage to me (like philosophy) - so why would I, being sane at the moment, want to memorize the birth date of Aristotle or Kant? I still have very faint idea of what these guys were teaching, but that doesn't stop me from developing embedded hardware and software, FPGAs and all, and I'm good at that.

      To summarize, this is a harmless enough offense because the perpetrator can't afford a forgery that is large enough to be noticed. If he opens a mass forgery business then it's a different story. But bumping a few grades for himself and for a few of his buddies can't be even detected on the national scale, and that's the scale you use when you apply to universities that are not in your own town.

  118. Overreaction? by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

    Whats with the overreaction tag? It's not an overreaction.

    When I was in high school, I was in Honors classes, and earned my A's and B's. Many, many students were in the same classes and couldn't fuckin' hack it and cheated their way to ahead of me in class.

    Get caught trying to make yourself look better than you are, and you get to sit in jail. In principle, you're stealing my future from me by cheating when I'm honest. You being 30 spots higher than me in the class lineup might mean you make $500,000 more than me in your lifetime. That's grand theft, and that's a felony. Deal with it.

    1. Re:Overreaction? by moxley · · Score: 1

      Yes, and if you and those students who "got ahead of you by cheating" live in western society then in a certain fashion maybe they deserved to get ahead of you - because these days gaming the system is what it is all about. They will be better prepared for the buniess world - especially if they plan on entering corporate America. America is not a meritocracy, no matter how much some people would like to pretend.

      It's unfortunate, but it is true. 99% of our politicians lie, act unethically, cheat, give their friends undeserved and unearned positions and promotions. Many of our business "leaders" do the same, exploiting every loophole, acting unethically and doing things that are anti-humanistic all in persuit of the dollar.

      I wish it wasn't this way - but pretending like it is and suggesting that an 18 year old kid who changed some grades deserves 38 YEARS is prison is ridiculous.

      The people who looted Enron and destroyed many, many lives and created economic hardship for countless people - I doubt they got anywhere near that.

      This presidential administration who has acted as an enemy of America and her constitution by lying us into a way of conquest, undermined the bill of rights, directly violated the civil liberties illegally of likely all Americans, have undermined the Geneva Convention and done many other things should be in jail - instead they act and are treated like royalty.

      Seriously...Put it in perspective. I think a year of jail time is too long for what this kid did - but that would seem more in line with what he actually did. 38 years is an extremely unjust punishment for this kid's crime.

      As far as you not cheating in school, at least you know you did the right thing - if it were me thaty would be enough for me..Because if you really want to start worrying about who is getting over on you (and the rest of us) by cheating the list is a mile long - and until the majority of the country wakes up and realizes how badly we're all being sodomized and decides to stop it by whatever means are necessary, refusing to stop or take no for an answer - nothing is going to change.

  119. Ya know what, he deserves some time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to go out on a limb here, but I think that everyone who is saying that "Prison isn't the answer." has never been to prison. About ten years ago, I was this kid -- cocky, arrogant, boastful, and while this kid did nothing more than install a keylogger to get a password, I changed a point of sales software's return code to refund a random credit card in addition to the returning person's credit card during the busy Holiday return season at a Major Department store. I was caught, and subsequently confessed, and I was sentenced to ten months in prison (Not Jail, Prison).

    It was the best thing that ever happened to me.

    It showed me that there were consequences for my actions, and it showed me that you still need to think about what the hell you're actually trying to do before you do it, as well as showing me a side of people that you normally don't see.

    I went to college, obtained my degrees in Computer Engineering, and had my convictions sealed, and one company that I interviewed for tried telling me that I was a convicted felon, at which point I said, "Let's run my Fingerprints." They came back clean, and people are still none the wiser. You make mistakes when you're young. People expect that, and as long as you make strides to change your life, most everyone's rather receptive.

  120. Re:For those of you so against telecom immunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, the time honored slashdot trolling technique of try to lump us all into vague generalities.
    Truth is, we're all as different from each other as the rest of the world. The only difference between most of us and you is that most of us can talk to each other with some degree of mutual respect. Ass.

  121. Inevitable by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 1

    It is inevitable in a system of forced public education - where you're required not only to take courses outside your interest, but to do well in those courses - that some geniuses will have their permanent records ruined as a result, to the point where they have no hope of getting a job in the area of their interest.

    Of course, by trying to work around the system, he has made it worse for himself...

    1. Re:Inevitable by Bandman · · Score: 1

      He wasn't really trying to "work around" the system, he was more subverting it for profit.

      I'd have a lot more sympathy for him if he was trying to rearrange schedule conflicts for himself to get put in a more advanced class, or something. Petty changing of grades and falsifying of other documents for himself and his friends, not to mention the more insidious crimes on the list...not so much

  122. I asked for a car, I got a computer. by illegalcortex · · Score: 1

    I demand to know why this story isn't tagged "ninetimes"!

  123. Khan not Kahn by kbahey · · Score: 1

    Submission wrongly spells his name. His name is Khan and not Kahn.

  124. Re:1 day your hacking grades the next day NORAD ju by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please familiarize yourself with the concepts of 'punctuation' and 'spelling', then re-post your comment.

    Thank you.

  125. Re:Laws are laws by ruin20 · · Score: 1

    Laws are laws. They were written for a reason and now if has broken those laws he should be punished by those laws. Don't use "kids will be kids" arguments here, as they undermine the value of rule of law. What the hell are you teaching kids when they do something wrong that we say " oh oh well we'll give you a freebe on this one cause your young and smart and that's cute". The laws should be written in such a way that the judge has some discretion in sentence if they are really minor things. And lots of first time offenders draw a "sentence" but serve probation instead and the whole mess gets expunged if they meet the requirements set by the court. More than likely this is not a "life ruining" experience.

    --
    Oh honey look... How cute... an angry slashdotter!
  126. Re:IT'S A JOKE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't judge him, it just his nationality speaking for himself.

  127. slashdot effect... by whopub · · Score: 5, Funny

    But hey, who reads articles? This is slashdot. Exactly. And the servers get slashdotted just out of pure fear.
    1. Re:slashdot effect... by mmyrfield · · Score: 1

      But hey, who reads articles? This is slashdot.
      Exactly. And the servers get slashdotted just out of pure fear.
      How it really works is people have a choice: spend their time reading the article, or commenting without reading the article.
  128. A students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's been said that, A and B students, work for C and D students. While everybody is so upset at what's gone on here, you should really get used to it. A and B students work them selves into a hole. Congrats, you are smarter. The smartest in the world at doing whatever you do. However, it's someone like this Omar that you are going to call "Boss", and yes, he's going to get the big bucks. Why, you ask. It's simple, while you are busy knowing everything, and studying hard. He's getting it done the easy way.

    With this guy's mistake, A's and B's learned not to "cheat", and C's and D's learned that it's better not to get caught.

  129. Who cares? by PottedMeat · · Score: 1

    Seriously.

    If this kid was actually handed a sentence of 38 years then this story would be absurd enough to be newsworthy. Kids screw up. One of our biggest mistakes is trying to prevent them from doing it and punishing the hell out of them if they do. This leads to a society full of pansies that let corporations and politicians do anything they want.

    PM

  130. The criminals are the teachers and IT admins by j0ebaker · · Score: 1

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1

    The criminals are the software engineers, Teachers and IT Administrators and school board members who are not adhering to proper security practices. Students are in school to learn, to be curious, to test the boundaries.

    Hey, I am running for a seat in the US House of Representatives in Wisconsin's South East District:
    http://www.josephwilliambaker.org/
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
    Comment: http://getfiregpg.org/

    iD8DBQFIXV727J1dPd3sAmARAvxXAKC2W53AQ1dBDHGulNI47dalJbqjrQCgk+hr
    bgPmfJsfR0f3JO50J/rJ6tw=
    =2awL
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    1. Re:The criminals are the teachers and IT admins by j0ebaker · · Score: 1

      -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
      Hash: SHA1

      After reading more about the story the young man indeed seems to have gotten himself into hot water. But let's ask ourselves who was harmed by his actions and how will putting him away for 38 years actually help anybody? The largest part of all this is the government arbitrarily saying you can't do something and then penalizing when the rule is broken.

      Just wait and see. The criminal federal government will make a pea bargain to reduce his sentence if he will help them to hack into citizen's computers to supposedly help with "national intelligence".
      -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
      Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
      Comment: http://getfiregpg.org/

      iD8DBQFIXWh17J1dPd3sAmARAlseAJ9yM7H/I88Kaq0WDqXAJu+uNJaAxgCfTN6Q
      qtUrRZnYvPo3S7OyPGsdwFw=
      =sgYd
      -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  131. Rape in prison ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not too familiar with US prisons, but I've seen Prison Break, and I wonder if rape by career criminals is what the government is sentencing him to.

    This is a great chance to make or break his life. I pray that the judge/jury give him a chance to start afresh without sending him to prison.

  132. obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhnnnn!

  133. So if he was a non-douche it would be an issue? by phorm · · Score: 1

    So it the kid was actually some form of misunderstood super-genious then it would be to name him with a shitload of charges and up to nearly two lifetime sentences worth of jail-time? No, he won't likely get it, but the will likely use the threat of a much bigger sentence to push him into accepting the plea-de-jour.

    Does he deserve punishment, yes. Is it worth a perspective 38 years, no, and it sets a bad precedent if an overly hefty punishment is levied against him.

  134. Multiple counts doesn't really fit for everything by phorm · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that stacking "multiple counts" of a crime perhaps shouldn't apply to all cases. If he meddled with the same system multiple times, it seems to me that it should be one count of the same crime, versus if he did something like - say - crack (I used the term loosely for this script-kiddie) into several different systems. The counts concept works fine if you've got a rapist, murderer, etc, but not some kid who's exploiting the same crack in the same place over a given period.

  135. I agree by phorm · · Score: 1

    This kid was a jackass and deserved to get nailed, but he doesn't deserve to have them dig up every possible angle against the same thing, and hit him from all sides with it. The same tactics can (and have been) used to railroad those that didn't deserve a given charge, but were pressured into taking a lesser (though also undeserved) plea in fear of getting hit with the bigger punch if things went to trial. For example, see this case up here in Canada. Facing horrendous charges VS a lesser plea can push even innocent people to cave in.

  136. Maybe it's just US schools by phorm · · Score: 1

    Or maybe I just went to a more tolerant Canadian school. But back then, we had all sorts of fun within the rather poorly secured network. Heck, we wrote some games that the other kids loved, and then stashed backdoors in them to deal with the guys that were stealing our lunch money. They never did figure out why their computers froze or rebooted halfway through an unsaved piece of work (although to be fair they did that on their own sometimes anyhow).

    Nowadays it seems that I would probably have been hung out to dry for that sorta thing. Back then, my prof more or less know about it, and was content to warn us when things got too out of hand. Of course, I actually ended up working for that same school district sometime later, but at least IMHO the networks were a fair bit more secure then, but when kids did get into places they weren't supposed to we generally leaned towards warnings (and suspensions if it was serious) rather than prison terms. I think the prison system is busy enough with the murderers, rapists, burglars, and others.

  137. Throw the book at him. by Pyrion · · Score: 1

    The impression I'm getting is that he would've gotten away with it had he not asked the school for a transcript. As a rule of thumb, flunkies do not ask for transcripts. Brilliance does not offset hubris, and that is why I'm not at all bothered by the sheer scope of the charges brought against him.

    --
    "There is much pleasure to be gained from useless knowledge." - Bertrand Russell.
  138. Video of his father's reaction by GeorgeFitch3 · · Score: 1

    Video of his father's reaction to the charges: http://www.khaaan.com/

  139. So why multiply the offenses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be like counting a theft of a packet of crisps as "67 cases of potato crisp theft".

    He broke in.

    He changed his grades (note plural).

    TWO CHARGES MAX.

    B&E should be taken as normal B&E.

    The changing grades should see the grades dropped and something like 6 months or so community service.

  140. Screw Jail, send them back by billcopc · · Score: 1

    At the risk of sounding racist, I think his punishment should be deportation, if it is indeed true that his family just entered the country (couldn't find the source in the article). The parents can stay, but to hell with the kid.

    The fact that he went to such great lengths to cheat his way through high school, and more importantly to pursue further education, makes me hate this person almost instantly. He's clearly not interested in working and learning, he just wants a degree so he can defraud his future employers. This does not evolve into an honest, respectable adult, and the damage caused by a lifetime of incompetence has far-reaching consequences affecting thousands of lives. He is yet another bad apple in this logjam we call modern society.

    Why deportation ? Because he's too young for jail, and I don't think jail fixes anyone anyway. He now has a criminal record, which means he won't be able to get any decent jobs anyway. The funny thing about a criminal record, once you have one, there is less incentive to be good since a lifetime of flawless behavior won't erase the stain in your past, so you might as well break the rules and get rich doing it. He came here, presumably to pursue a more successful life, tried to shaft us, and got caught. Fail. No better life for you. Do not pass go.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
    1. Re:Screw Jail, send them back by drspliff · · Score: 1

      The fact that he went to such great lengths to cheat his way through high school, and more importantly to pursue further education, makes me hate this person almost instantly. He's clearly not interested in working and learning, he just wants a degree so he can defraud his future employers.

      We need sneaky little buggers like him, if I ran a security consulting firm I'd offer him freelance contracts and visa sponsorship if he needed.

  141. He'll be out in 5 years..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

    My JC, Diablo Valley College, recently had a massive "grades-for-cash" scandal that shook the state to its core.

    Long story short, some asshole was running a ring of student workers at the college who charged money for the changing of grades before they were entered by the student workers into the main computer system at the end of the year. They were caught, and the ringleader was charged with an number of felonies, and the resulting prison time and deportation. When his family learned he was going to be deported after serving prison time, they screamed "RACISM! RACISM! RACISM!" and the judge caved in and let hime post bail. Currently, the asshole is a fugitive after skipping court.

    The kid in the article deserves to be charged with every single thing the cops can make stick, thrown in prison, and when his MAXIMUM TIME is up, kicked out of the country for life. These sorts of scandals affect *EVERYBODY* at the schools where they occur, since it adds a cloud of suspicion to their record, regardless if it is legit or not.

    Call me insensitive, but they should send him to Leavenworth, Attica, ADX Florence, or San Quentin and scare the living shit out of them. Even Guantanamo Bay is starting to sound like a good destination for him.

    His parents should be given a commentdation for refusing to bail their jackass son out of the slammer.

    When you have a tally like this:

    34 felony counts of altering public record
    11 felony counts of stealing and secreting public records
    7 felony counts of illegal computer access and fraud
    6 felony counts of burglary
    4 felony counts of identity theft
    3 felony counts of altering book of records
    2 felony counts of receiving stolen property
    1 felony count of conspiracy
    1 felony count of attempting altering of a public record .....AND you screw over everybody who attends your school, the notion of "cruel and unusual punishment" should be embraced, rather than detested. If he doesn't want to live by the rules, why protect him?

    FROM ANOTHER ARTICLE:

    "Mr Khans defence lawyer, Carol Lavacol, described her client as a really nice kid and said: Theres a lot more going on than meets the eye."

    -Sure. It's not his fault. It's society's fault. It's everybody elses fault, but not his.

    AND ANOTHER ARTICLE:

    "Khan's attorney, Merlin Stapleton, told the local rag that the charges were too severe. He said it was not the first time a kid cheated and often they did these sorts of things to find out if they could."

    -Awwwww..... Is somebody not happy with suffering the consequesnces of their actions? He's right though: It's not the first time someone cheated, and it sure as hell isn't the first time someone was punished for it.

    ""and often they did these sorts of things to find out if they could.""

    -So they cheated and burglarized to find out of they could get away with cheating and burglary? Well, the definitely found out the answer to that question. Too bad it wasn't on the test.

    Enough with the bleeding heart defense lawyers! This isn't exactly an off-the-cuff accusation: This was a completed and well thought out crime and conspiracy by Khan and his accomplice, with more than enough proof.

    To hear Mr. Khans defense lawyers say such stupid claims makes me think that the defense team is as smart as the defendant.

    Personally, I think a good, old-fashioned public beating is in order. I have a baseball bat I'm willing to donate to the cause!

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  142. Re:1 year for being smart, 37 for being a smart as by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    Which of those two things required any smarts at all.
    You know what, you're right, he's a dumb ass. But now that begs the question should you get more time in gaol for being a dumb ass than you would get for murder?
    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  143. nice work by robogobo · · Score: 0

    OK, he screwed up. But what this kid needs is encouragement. Put him in jail and he'll just go back to it when he gets out, with resentment and revenge in mind. Someone should give him a job and utilize his talent.

  144. Probably won't go to jail... by sigzero · · Score: 0

    But he need a big fine, community service and they need to kick him out of school. The 38 years is only because of how many times he did it. No judge is going to send him away for that.

  145. Straight As? That's the problem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to hack intelligently then you NEVER give yourself top marks -- Ok so he had C, D and F grades... Change like this: C=B||C D=C F=D

  146. Hope Kirk prosecutes this by michaelg1987 · · Score: 1

    I'm seeing a secretary printing up the report cards, thumbing through the grades as she realizes that they were doctored... "Hey, I didn't know he got straiKHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN!"

  147. But he has to be allowed to grow up! by kklein · · Score: 1

    Of course, he's not going to get the maximum, or anything close, but let me respond to your sentiment nonetheless:

    Taking responsibility for choices we make is all part of growing up.

    Throwing people in jail for a long time doesn't allow them to grow up. Or, rather, it forces them to grow up outside of society, in a different paradigm--one whose lessons lead to disaster on the outside. As a general rule, I am very much against locking kids up, because it doesn't help society one iota.

    Taking responsibility is important; but it is even more important that he grow up.

    I had a run-in with the law when I was in high school. It impressed upon me that the world of high school is not the world. This got me through the rest of it. It's easy for high school kids to think that the school is the whole world. This leads to things like falsifying your grades or killing people because they pick on you. If we want people to grow up, we need to allow them into society. We can't sequester them off into prisons or schools.

    This kid thought it wasn't as big a deal as it was. It's very easy to think that when your world is a high school. You see the small actions as sneaking into someone's office and installing a keylogger, then the small actions of changing your grades, as the small actions they are. Maybe there's a rush of adrenaline the first time, but then it just gets to be routine. It's no big deal, right? You're tapping away at your computer. But then the real world comes in and shows you the implication of those actions and then you get it.

    I'd wager he gets it now. There's no reason to rub it in.

  148. Alert. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This user is a psychopath

    Psychopaths are obstacles. Like sharks or burning houses. To be recognized and dealt with accordingly. All psychos are essentially the same; they can only mirror behavior because they are incapable of generating their own personality. They don't have one. No ability to love or understand love; just ego. Black holes; any energy spent on them is wasted utterly; it goes nowhere but down. They are not to be feared; they are to be understood and destroyed. We as humans, need to understand that there is no ability to recover or become repaired in the psychopath. The only answer is to remove them from positions of power and either incarcerate them for life or destroy them. The world would be almost unrecognizably better without the psychopath; wars, poverty and hunger, injustice; nearly all of this can be traced back to these black hole personalities, and the sooner we recognize them and commit ourselves to their extermination, the better.

    This "shiftless" user#410350 needs to be flagged and traced to the individual in question and have the police made aware of its potential for conscienceless murder, rape, and general evil. This is not a joke. The desire to give a free and fair chance to psychopaths, to give them the benefit of the doubt, is what gives them power over us; they do not offer the same generosity. Somebody who openly claims to be psychopathic is probably psychopathic and needs to be treated the same way as somebody who jokes about leaving bombs in airports.

    Learn about the Psychopath in order to protect yourself. An excerpt. . .

    When the psychopath is frustrated, i.e. doesn't get what they want, satisfaction of the hunger is denied or delayed, what they seem to feel is that everything in the world "out there" is against them while they are only good. This may, of course, translate into actual thought loops of being good, long-suffering and only seeking the ideal of love, peace, safety, beauty, warmth and comfort that comes with satiation (never mind that they can never achieve it), but the most fundamental thing about it is that "the infant experiences itself still in a state of limitlessness power and knowledge, a state that we call its grandiose self". That is, when a psychopath is confronted with something displeasing or threatening to his hunger, that object (person, idea, group, whatever), is placed in the "all bad" category the same way that a newborn infant reacts to a negative trauma or denial of wants or needs: a mindless, instinctive, screaming rage that is designed to be so unpleasant (possibly evolutionarily so) that the caretaker immediately does whatever is necessary to bring the infant's rage to an end, to satisfy the hunger (for whatever).

    In short, if we are positing that the psychopath's inner reality is structurally similar to that of a newborn infant - or at least apparently similar - then we must also realize that the rage is also structural. Whatever triggers it MUST come into compliance, the infant/psychopath cannot be denied; the rage, the crying, the fit, whatever, will continue until the infant either gets what is wanted/needed or is so exhausted that it cannot strive any longer. And, of course, with a grown up psychopath, this structural rage has far more support and possibilities (including utilizing a very complex brain) for sustaining it for a very long time: as long as necessary for THAT OBJECT of the rage to be incorporated as was originally desired.

    The bottom line is: there is never even an instant when the psychopath feels "traumatized" or "shamed" or "helpless" - the structural grandiosity is ever present along with the rage/rejection of denial.

    When dealing with a grown up psychopath, things get a bit more complicated, of course, because, as mentioned above, the brain has continued to grow and develop

  149. LOL mod parent up! by shiftless · · Score: 1

    +5, funny!

    This "shiftless" user#410350 needs to be flagged and traced to the individual in question and have the police made aware of its potential for conscienceless murder, rape, and general evil. This is not a joke.

    Really? I thought it was pretty funny. You got some things right, but you are so far off base in other areas it's not even funny. Here's your first mistake. Just because a person is a psychopath does not mean he is a rapist, murderer, or even evil. A lot of murderers/rapists/etc are psychopaths, yes, in the same way that a lot of criminals are gun owners. Does that make every gun owner a criminal? Of course not.

    The desire to give a free and fair chance to psychopaths, to give them the benefit of the doubt, is what gives them power over us;

    Actually, what gives us power over you is our willingness to go to any length, bear any burden, etc to win and prevail at any cost.

    The only answer is to remove them from positions of power and either incarcerate them for life or destroy them.

    Yeah, good luck with that, LOL.

  150. Re:1 day your hacking grades the next day NORAD ju by nettdata · · Score: 1

    Wow... you must know of some special grades, as mine have never hacked anything, never mind actually DONE something... but alas, we won't know what those hacking grades did because you totally forgot to tell us what they did the next day with, apparently, NORAD.

    Too bad we can't have a "learn-basic-grammar" modifier to rep points.

    --



    $0.02 (CDN)
  151. Deport him. by Analog-X64 · · Score: 1

    I think a suitable punishment would be for him to be sent back to he's original country, and have to re-submit paperwork to be allowed to come back. He got caught.. now imagine how many others who do this dont get caught... and endup getting a Job because their transcript shows that they have all A's which they dont deserve. Would you like this guy to do surgery on you, if he decides to become a doctor?? If we become too lenient to this type of abuse, the word gets out and others will try the same.

  152. Burglary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, the kid needs a year or two in jail.

  153. So I take it that you did not see wargames? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    So I take it that you did not see wargames?

  154. good grief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    my sister the ADA can't even get a third time DUI offender thrown in jail for maybe 6 months after they commit felony vehicular homicide on a suspended license for the second time and this kid faces that much prison time?

     

  155. How is 38 years gonna be any different then 10? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think, like everyone else has said, that 38 years is WAAY to much time. That is going to ruin his life, and its not worth it.

    On the other hand, I am really annoyed at the Slashdot crowd, not over this issue, plenty of people have already said my beliefs on this. Time after time I see "bla bla bla Hacking bla Jail Time". We are a smart group of people, why should we be misusing a word like this? Hacking is an interesting or non obvious solution to a problem. Cracking, is breaking into unauthorized systems.

  156. = Students like Kahn & the state of InfoSec = by PCMeister · · Score: 1

    May be slightly off-topic, but then again...

    This kind of article is one that usually gets people to choose sides almost immediately. The truth of the matter is that students like Kahn should have the benefit of being recognized for their talents early on and foster them so they don't go on to commit crimes such as this; possibly going on to work in consulting firms or for the military if they so choose.

    With identity thefts on the rise in the past several years due to massive data breaches at credit card companies, banks, etc., in addition to breaches at government agencies, it is not difficult to ascertain that the state of information security in this country is in dire straits. Discussions can be had with regard to where the break-down in security occurred, but that's besides the point.

    With many other nations focusing on building their cyber-warfare capabilities, as is the U.S. of course, Kahn will more than likely be scooped up by any number of government agencies or end up working for a military contractor as a 'plea deal'. Since this in *no way* rises to the level of what Kevin Mitnick did, odds are that Kahn will have things work out in his favor at some point down the line. With the laws in this post-911 world being much stricter, I guess we'll just have to wait and see.

    I agree that his actions more than likely caused some innocent kids to get looked over for scholarships and the like, but I seriously doubt he'll be tossed aside. Then again, if he's an arrogant little prick, they'll drop the hammer on him so fast, he won't know what hit him.

  157. I know him by Sandspeed · · Score: 1

    yup he is a retard i agree with the person who posted that on the newspaper, honestly he probibly had someone to help him ;)

  158. RE: by wasmoke · · Score: 1

    KAAAHHHHNNNNN!

  159. Re: by wasmoke · · Score: 1

    Darn...it appears I was too late and this joke has already been used.

  160. Well in the old days... by Time_Warped · · Score: 1

    I think instead of prison, he should have to write...oh maybe 20 million times or so I will not hack. Thats the way we did it in the old school days by cracky ;-) No diploma until he finishes.

    1. Re:Well in the old days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 for i=1 to 20000000; 20 print "I will not hack"; 30 next i; 40 end

  161. This is completele bollocks. by cavebison · · Score: 1

    When you're 18 years old, everything is fun, especially naughty stuff. He didn't cause death and mayhem, what he did was the equivalent of cooking the books. He's being a good capitalist, he just got caught.

    Now, if you're running for President, the sentence for fiddling the results should be harsh indeed.

    When you're 18, you're expected to follow the example of your elders, no?

  162. Re: I didn't post bail for mine on Christmas Eve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a phone call from my estranged daughter (custody went to my ex-wife) on Christmas eve. I think my daughter was about 15. She had been arrested for shoplifting. At 10PM she called from Juvenal Hall and wanted me to drive 180 miles (right away) and bail her out. I guess it's hard to be a parent sometimes, and hard to be the non-custody parent too. You know I felt really bad about that, for most of the night. But by the next day, I realized that I might have had an accident driving through the mountains in the middle of the night, and for what? To tell my daughter in so many words that unconditional love meant I would back her up when she broke the law. Within a day or so the ex signed her out. She never really got over it, and may not until she is older and her daughter pulls the same crap (I hope not).

  163. stumped? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, what gives us power over you is our willingness to go to any length, bear any burden, etc to win and prevail at any cost.

    If you are a psychopath, this will be like talking to a retarded tree stump. If you are not, then perhaps this will help you out:

    Your various definitions and posted understandings of what a psychopath is, are completely wrong. Do a little research. No, scratch that. Do a LOT of research. Follow the link provided and read up on what you are claiming to be.

    One possibility is that what is really going on here is that you are afraid of your feelings because they can hurt and that you have learned it is entirely possible to shut down those feelings. That's a very common geek male maneuver performed by somebody who was hurt and scared a lot when young, but who wasn't strong enough to overcome those experiences and who instead chose to shut down that aspect of himself. This is compounded by the media which deliberately glamorizes psychopathic behavior as empowering and positive, offering it as a mode of being which can be picked by those who seek material reward in life and who learned to fear their own complex emotions. (There are reasons for doing this which I will not get into.) --Such a choice of behavior is far more common that many would think, but it's certainly not actual brain damage. If you're lucky, that's the case because it can be rejected. If not, then you're a lost cause. Not even a 'you'. --No better than a crappy AI machine stuck on self-delusion; that's the sociopath and the narcissist.

    The full blown psychopath is kind of like the broken model, stuck on "self-destruct and cause as much pain and suffering on the way down as possible".

    So. . . Am I talking to an actual brain damage case or just some poor wounded boy who is frightened of emotions?

    To make this convenient; here's your set of response options: 1) False bravado; laugh it off. 2)Broken logic, (which probably means you are a sicko). 3) No response and stop thinking about it asap. 4)Admitting you are wrong. (Not likely for a coward who can't face his emotions, and certainly not possible for an actual psychopath who isn't neurologically capable of understanding or forming the required thought patterns.) 5) Some combination of the above. 6) The real and obvious option for an actual psycho which I wonder if you are smart enough to figure out.

    1. Re:stumped? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      6) The real and obvious option for an actual psycho which I wonder if you are smart enough to figure out. Suck my d**k?
      --
      You just got troll'd!
    2. Re:stumped? by shiftless · · Score: 1

      What are you, a fucking internet psychologist? I knew there was some shit seriously wrong with me for years and it was not until I was diagnosed with psychopathy that I finally knew what it was. There goes all your grand and varied theories right out the window. Funny that you call me the coward when you are such a pussy that you won't even post under your real user account. Go find someone else's posts to troll, troll.

    3. Re:stumped? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you, a fucking internet psychologist? I knew there was some shit seriously wrong with me for years and it was not until I was diagnosed with psychopathy that I finally knew what it was. There goes all your grand and varied theories right out the window. Funny that you call me the coward when you are such a pussy that you won't even post under your real user account. Go find someone else's posts to troll, troll.

      So lame. You're either a liar, or your doctor is an idiot. They don't let confirmed psychopaths out to play.

      If you were a psychopath, you wouldn't admit to having anything wrong with you, and you certainly wouldn't be trying to validate yourself by claiming that only some psychos are bad. Psychos don't seek validation, unless it's a guise for a manipulation. Wounded boys with life issues, however, do seek validation. So you're either a brain-damaged AI, or you're a frightened little boy-man pretending to be strong and unfeeling so that the world can't hurt him.

  164. At the end of the day, hi DID get the job done... by SplatMan_DK · · Score: 1

    He's a stupid script kiddie. That may be so. But at the end of the day he did get the job done. Right? RIGHT?

    He got busted because he was an ass at planning. Fine. But he altered the scores, which was probably the original goal of his actions.

    I have no love for script kiddes - but you should never underestimate them. They often have social skills or creativity beyond that of many programmers. And they get the job done using simple and proven methods; an approach which is mostly rewarded (jobs, career, etc).

    The most dangerous "hacker" is one who doesn't care about professional pride. Only about the end goal: stealing and/or altering data.

    In fact, these low-tech "script kiddy" approaches are the ones most feared by security experts. Because they are neither too proud or too afraid of bypassing normal security measures by using social engineering or physical force (breaking into an office). This kid would probably have gotten NOWHERE if he had attempted to hack the schools systems from a remote xDSL line, getting past the firewalls and routers, port scanning, sniffing protocols, and using exploits. His solution? Install a keylogger on a computer in the administration. Then use the information collected. Simple and efficient.

    According to this story from 2006, social engineering and low-tech approaches are among the biggest security threats.

    :-)

    - Jesper

    --
    My security clearance is so high I have to kill myself if I remember I have it...
  165. Dark Yoshi by darkyoshi87 · · Score: 1

    Omar Kahn? Kahn. Do you read me? Kahn?! KAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHN!

  166. Not unconstitutionally wiretapping people but by unity100 · · Score: 1

    hacking a few high school grades deserves 38 years in prison. get a load of that.

  167. And to think... by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    All he had to do was write the answers on his arm or copy off the kid next to him, and he could've cheated his way to A's just like everyone else does with zero consequences.

    --
    stuff |
  168. Hide the Children! by Athaulf · · Score: 1

    Goddamn Mongols! Stop breaking down my shitty firewall!

  169. Every dog is entitled to one bite, eh? by westlake · · Score: 0
    Some jail; around 6 months.
    A far sight better than 38 years, which is more than some murderers get.
    When this student commits another crime in an attempt to get ahead, such as stealing an identity, and when he gets caught, then throw the book at him.

    This - adult - is facing damn near fifty felony counts of altering public records, seven felony counts of computer fraud, four felony counts of identity theft and six of burglary.

    Some murderers face lethal injection or life without parole.

    But the Geek always takes exception when another Geek is looking at hard time.

    That makes him no better than the Enron exec who can't conceive of a world in which the white collar criminal is treated like any other felon.

    1. Re:Every dog is entitled to one bite, eh? by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      Conversely, some murderers get off with under ten years.

      Are you really saying that changing your grades is even remotely within the same ballpark as killing someone?

      Time to come back to reality, pal.

    2. Re:Every dog is entitled to one bite, eh? by uglydog · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Dude... his name is Omar Khan. He's probably a terrorist. Fry him.

  170. Altering AP scores seems a bigger deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Changing class grades points to security problems at his school, but altering his AP scores points to a problem at ETS and/or the College Board. I can see how a local HS may not have good security, but if ETS scores are also easily altered, this calls into question the reliability of SAT, AP, GRE, etc. scores nationwide.

  171. take away degree by peter303 · · Score: 1

    In many schools they would not award the degree then.
    Many college apps ask about criminal records. Certain types of crimes or a false answer can prevent admission to college. There was a famous case about a Harvard student being expelled for not putting her murder conviction on the application.

  172. Mod parent -1, Conservative Wingnut by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    The kid in the article deserves to be charged with every single thing the cops can make stick We'll be sure to make that happen during your trial.

    Personally, I think a good, old-fashioned public beating is in order. I have a baseball bat I'm willing to donate to the cause! The result being that you get charged with assault and battery. That one will definitely stick.

    End result:
    Troll gets sent to PMITA Prison for 25 to life, Omar gets an effective pardon.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  173. This kid should be praised, not punished by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This kid is a genius. He was able to penetrate a school's security (as weak as it may be) and manipulate data in such as way as to benefit himself and others. How could this be a punishable offense?

    He is obviously gifted, and should be given praise for this gift. This, if even a crime, is a victimless one. These people need to smarten up and realize you need to cheat to get ahead in life, just ask W.

  174. Too harsh by kaosfury · · Score: 1

    Yes, he did something stupid and was caught. Yes he should be punished. Is the punishment too harsh? Absolutely. He is up for more jail time than people who are convicted of actual, violent crimes.

    --
    "Trust that little voice in your head that says 'Wouldn't it be interesting if...' and then do it." - Duane Michals
  175. You trust your government? by FatSean · · Score: 1

    You call ME insane?

    Damn, did your Daddy come back from Iraq with no legs or something? Sheesh..

    --
    Blar.
  176. Bad Camo by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    You just don't include 12 more people into your 'crime'. It's not a secret anymore after that.

    He was probably trying to cover his tracks by changing lots of kids' grades so if it was found out it wouldn't be immediately obvious. And he probably wasn't smart enough to do it from Starbucks.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  177. I was not "equating." by unassimilatible · · Score: 1
    I was pointing out hypocrisy. Obviously the situations are not identical. But one of the main arguments you /. lefties use to argue against telco immunity is that they broke the law. I've read it scores of times here. But lawbreaking is apparently OK if it is done by someone or a cause you are more sympathetic to. Hence, hypocrisy (what liberals call "moral relatavism"). Of course, since someone challenged your world view and the conventional wisdom here, he must be called stupid. I think you can tell from my prose, that is not the case. But liberals love to call people who have a good faith disagreement with them names, rather than debating with some degree of civility and reasonableness. Liberals simply do not like debate. A great irony, considering that you are all howling about how the Bush Administration is taking away all of your freedoms. You holler about how government surveillance of phone calls will hurt your freedom of expression and privacy, but you don't even want to express yourself to those who disagree with you in good faith - you only want to name-call.

    The good news is that a large majority of the country disagrees with you too (yes, I know elitist libs, they are stupid too). Most of the country does think it is reasonable to give the telcoms immunity, since they were assisting the government after 9/11 in good faith and relied on the government's assurances they would be immune. I can only imagine if the government went back on a promise to you, oh-so-brilliant Tenebrousedge, you would find that unfair and be calling for heads. And that, too, would make you a hypocrite.

    I do think it is funny that you use the word "treasonous." First you lefties redefine "patriotism" as slamming and criticizing your country. Now defending it is treasonous. Unbelievable. Up is down, black is white. Groupthink on Slashdot is smart, challenging it is dumb.

    You may now resume your deep thinking, expressed as petty insults at dissenters.

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
    1. Re:I was not "equating." by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

      Quit making general statements about liberals and how bad they are. That is also a remarkably poor way to "debate" with people, mostly because you leave the idea that the person that you're talking with is, in fact, a person, and not a faceless mental construct that you've built up about a category of people that you dislike.

      I did respond to your original post detailing exactly how large a gulf there was between the two situations, and I am disappointed to see that you have not responded to that.

      This idea of the government 'going back on a promise' skips the idea that the promise violated the Constitution. I hear that the US armed forces undergo regular training about how and why to refuse an illegal order. If "most of the country" [citation needed] thinks that doing illegal things that violate the very idea that the law has any meaning in this country, then "most of the country" has not bothered to think of the long-term consequences of laying down a rule that says that 'anything the executive branch says or does should be legal'.

      I am, in fact, furious, and calling for heads, because the administration did go back on a formal oath to me: to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. Eliminating a system of checks and balances and violating the Bill of Rights--you wonder why I use the word treason?

      Patriotism is not defined as criticism of one's country, but it has been defined as the last refuge of a scoundrel. I would hope that upholding the laws of the country, and the ideals it was founded on, would never be seen as being unpatriotic. One of those ideals, however, was indeed the freedom of speech and dissent. Or is this country already perfect, that we do not and shall never need reform?

      Defending the country is not treason. How nice of you to redefine criminal activity as defending the country. Do I get to rob a jewelry store and do the same thing? Or is that only reserved for 'high crimes and misdemeanors'?

      If the telcos get immunity (thus proving that the Nuremberg Defense is good for something), does that mean that the people who ordered them to do illegal things should stand trial?

      --
      Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.