No, he is objecting to the Code of Conduct saying one thing and then the organization engaging a group to fill internships in a manner that excludes certain races, genders, and/or sexual orientations.
CoC: Don't discriminate.
Outreachy: We are going to discriminate in who is eligible to be an intern.
I have heard many people say "only people with power can be racist". In this case, who has the power? Outreachy has the power.
And, should a woman who is not victimized or harassed just leave and quit instead of playing the victim when a company has policies that are discriminatory and effect others?
Basically, you are saying that the thread is using a straw man fallacy ( some other projects or incidents vs the one that is actually under discussion, LLVM)
Laura Conroy, a spokeswoman for the district, says the two cases are unrelated. She echoed criticism found in an Oct. 20, 2014, district-funded investigation that Bigham had let his Teacher of the Year status go to his head and led to too many absences.
You live any where in the world and you identify as a woman (cis or trans), trans man, or genderqueer person (including genderfluid or genderfree).
You live in the United States or you are a U.S. national or permanent resident living aboard, AND you are a person of any gender who is Black/African American, Hispanic/Latin@, Native American/American Indian, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander
The community change I cannot take is how the social injustice
movement has permeated it. When I joined llvm no one asked or cared
about my religion or political view. We all seemed committed to just
writing a good compiler framework.
Somewhat recently a code of conduct was adopted. It says that the
community tries to welcome people of all "political belief". Except
those whose political belief mean that they don't agree with the code
of conduct. Since agreement is required to take part in the
conferences, I am no longer able to attend.
The last drop was llvm associating itself with an organization that
openly discriminates based on sex and ancestry (1,2). This goes
directly against my ethical views and I think I must leave the project
to not be associated with this.
Psychology degrees open doors into teaching and therapy jobs to name just two. Music degrees open doors into all manner of production jobs like audio editing, sound recordist, post production, score writing, so on and so forth
Please state what the job market is like for teachers, sound recordists, post-production workers, score writers, etc. I believe you will find, assuming you do the research, that job growth is stagnant, pay is low, and employment opportunities are few. A primary indicator if the value of a degree is whether one can get a job in that industry. Someone who has a degree in psychology who becomes a teacher is considered underemployed.
But I bet you're one of those knuckle dragging, mouth breathing, Fox News/Daily Mail subscribers that think these people just fall out of trees.
Ah, there it is, the ad hominem so common in the leftist SJW community. It is rather ironic considering your sig:
Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
No, it would not "solve the low skilled worker crisis". First of, the "crisis" you claim is due to an oversupply of low skilled workers. Most illegal aliens are low skilled workers. Most citizens and legal immigrants who are low skilled did poorly in school and should not be in university courses. Finally, assuming you could get all those low skilled workers to graduate from university, you end up with a glut of degree holders who can't find a job because the degrees they obtained will either be a) the easiest to get or b) the degrees themselves will be devalued because everyone has one.
You really didn't think this through, did you? That is rather obvious by what you spout at the end.
The offer work for hire and are refusing to work for someone because of that someone's sexual orientation. If they just baked cakes, there wouldn't be a problem. But, they are offering an inferior service to a customer which the baker admitted was based on the customer's inclusion in a class that happens to be a protected class.
Would you feel the same if it were a black couple being told "I will sell you a cake but I won't decorate it because you are black"?
How about if they were being told they had to sit in a particular section of a restaurant or drink only out of a specific water fountain?
What if it were an interracial couple (interracial marriage is banned in the bible e.g. Deut7:3 and Ezra 9:12) were told by a baker "I will sell you a cake but I will not decorate it because I believe in the bible and it says mixed race marriages are wrong"?
How about if it were a Jewish couple being told by the baker "I will sell you a cake but I won't decorate it with a Star of David because Jews killed Jesus"?
As long as it is OK for a member of a group to use a derogatory word for a member of said group then it is impossible to ban hate speech or racist epithets. As long as people say "Only we can use that world! When you use it you are being a raciest!!11!!!", you can't be sure the person using is racist if you don't know the user's race.
There just isn't any way to know if "B!gPEEN34" is black or white so no way to know if s/he is racist when using the "n-word".
First, it was the left's move to slowly shift from "illegal alien" to "undocumented immigrant" so that if someone is against illegal aliens, people on the left say he is against immigration, which is both a useful lie and a useful false conflation.
Then, someone who is 19 is "a teenager" who should be coddled and treated like a 13 year old if he commits a crime. Unless he commits an horrific crime, then he is an adult.
Now, people who are against sex work, mostly people on the right and the religious, have moved from "prostitution" to "sex trafficking" to falsely conflate prostitution with sex slavery so they can pass laws like this.
No one has any right to complain about this because this tactic is used by all sides to try to get what they want and now it is being used to stifle free speech.
It is hard to argue that you cannot trust the government when the government isn't really all that bad
Basically, a bunch of dipshit so-called anarchists like to whine about the government and having to follow laws. They never consider that people like me exist who would kill them for being rude, annoying, and stupid.
Slashdot Mirror
CoC: Don't discriminate.
Outreachy: We are going to discriminate in who is eligible to be an intern.
I have heard many people say "only people with power can be racist". In this case, who has the power? Outreachy has the power.
And, should a woman who is not victimized or harassed just leave and quit instead of playing the victim when a company has policies that are discriminatory and effect others?
Basically, you are saying that the thread is using a straw man fallacy ( some other projects or incidents vs the one that is actually under discussion, LLVM)
Laura Conroy, a spokeswoman for the district, says the two cases are unrelated. She echoed criticism found in an Oct. 20, 2014, district-funded investigation that Bigham had let his Teacher of the Year status go to his head and led to too many absences.
You must meet one of the following criteria:
An excerpt for you:
The community change I cannot take is how the social injustice movement has permeated it. When I joined llvm no one asked or cared about my religion or political view. We all seemed committed to just writing a good compiler framework.
Somewhat recently a code of conduct was adopted. It says that the community tries to welcome people of all "political belief". Except those whose political belief mean that they don't agree with the code of conduct. Since agreement is required to take part in the conferences, I am no longer able to attend.
The last drop was llvm associating itself with an organization that openly discriminates based on sex and ancestry (1,2). This goes directly against my ethical views and I think I must leave the project to not be associated with this.
Seems to me he was upset about people prying into him:
I cannot take is how the social injustice movement has permeated it. When I joined llvm no one asked or cared about my religion or political view.
I don't want anyone interrogating me about my beliefs and views, so I don't blame him for leaving
Better to be a SJW than to be an asshole, don't you agree?
Says the SJW asshole who is so arrogant in his assumption that he is correct that he can't see he is being an asshole.
Which male directors specially were selected in part because of their sex? Please elaborate.
So, no, you can't name any who were selected based on their gender. You are just taking it on faith that it happened.
You are assuming something systemic without evidence. Stop it.
You really have no idea about geophysics and geology.
Yeah, because no one is going to notice the literal tons of refined metal sitting in massive clumps.
Stop being dumb asses. Next question.
Psychology degrees open doors into teaching and therapy jobs to name just two. Music degrees open doors into all manner of production jobs like audio editing, sound recordist, post production, score writing, so on and so forth
Please state what the job market is like for teachers, sound recordists, post-production workers, score writers, etc. I believe you will find, assuming you do the research, that job growth is stagnant, pay is low, and employment opportunities are few. A primary indicator if the value of a degree is whether one can get a job in that industry. Someone who has a degree in psychology who becomes a teacher is considered underemployed.
But I bet you're one of those knuckle dragging, mouth breathing, Fox News/Daily Mail subscribers that think these people just fall out of trees.
Ah, there it is, the ad hominem so common in the leftist SJW community. It is rather ironic considering your sig:
Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
No, it would not "solve the low skilled worker crisis". First of, the "crisis" you claim is due to an oversupply of low skilled workers. Most illegal aliens are low skilled workers. Most citizens and legal immigrants who are low skilled did poorly in school and should not be in university courses. Finally, assuming you could get all those low skilled workers to graduate from university, you end up with a glut of degree holders who can't find a job because the degrees they obtained will either be a) the easiest to get or b) the degrees themselves will be devalued because everyone has one.
You really didn't think this through, did you? That is rather obvious by what you spout at the end.
Someone didn't like my valid questions and modded them as troll. I guess they are trying to take away my free speech and also didn't read my sig
Look up the Brandenburg test.
Should we tolerate your intolerance?
Who decides what is too much?
The offer work for hire and are refusing to work for someone because of that someone's sexual orientation. If they just baked cakes, there wouldn't be a problem. But, they are offering an inferior service to a customer which the baker admitted was based on the customer's inclusion in a class that happens to be a protected class.
Would you feel the same if it were a black couple being told "I will sell you a cake but I won't decorate it because you are black"?
How about if they were being told they had to sit in a particular section of a restaurant or drink only out of a specific water fountain?
What if it were an interracial couple (interracial marriage is banned in the bible e.g. Deut7:3 and Ezra 9:12) were told by a baker "I will sell you a cake but I will not decorate it because I believe in the bible and it says mixed race marriages are wrong"?
How about if it were a Jewish couple being told by the baker "I will sell you a cake but I won't decorate it with a Star of David because Jews killed Jesus"?
I stopped using it the day I saw ads popping up on websites about something private a friend had emailed me for help with.
As long as it is OK for a member of a group to use a derogatory word for a member of said group then it is impossible to ban hate speech or racist epithets. As long as people say "Only we can use that world! When you use it you are being a raciest!!11!!!", you can't be sure the person using is racist if you don't know the user's race.
There just isn't any way to know if "B!gPEEN34" is black or white so no way to know if s/he is racist when using the "n-word".
First, it was the left's move to slowly shift from "illegal alien" to "undocumented immigrant" so that if someone is against illegal aliens, people on the left say he is against immigration, which is both a useful lie and a useful false conflation.
Then, someone who is 19 is "a teenager" who should be coddled and treated like a 13 year old if he commits a crime. Unless he commits an horrific crime, then he is an adult.
Now, people who are against sex work, mostly people on the right and the religious, have moved from "prostitution" to "sex trafficking" to falsely conflate prostitution with sex slavery so they can pass laws like this.
No one has any right to complain about this because this tactic is used by all sides to try to get what they want and now it is being used to stifle free speech.
It is hard to argue that you cannot trust the government when the government isn't really all that bad
Basically, a bunch of dipshit so-called anarchists like to whine about the government and having to follow laws. They never consider that people like me exist who would kill them for being rude, annoying, and stupid.