I have posted some suggestions for you, but the slashdot crowd did not like concrete alternative suggestions, so unless you read at -2 you woundn't see it;-)
The papimi device have the following centers in california why don't you test it out.
As programmers we know that to optimize something we have to have a way to measure it.
I think that a good user interface should be easy to learn and very productive. But in most cases is easy to use (GUI's) not very productive and very productive (like vi) is not easy to use.
So, for a ui the is tree thing to measure.
1) usability. 2) productivity. 3) the users transit time from newbie to expert.
A way to measure this would be to make a test where you asked a user to make many similar excises.
Then the usability would relate to how fast they solved the first excises. The productivity would relate to how fast they solved the last excises. The transit time would be the time from the start to when the minimum excises time where reached.
Then give the same test to a group of different users to generate a representative data set.
To test a new email client you could ask the user to isolate a specific string from each of 100 emails.
> Wouldn't it just be simpler to have no patents at all?
Yes, but this is not the reality of the world.
To win the battle this way you'll have to have more money/time than your opposition, for lobing your government or else the opposition will just keep trying every year, until they got there way.
I would rather spend my time programming !!
PPL is like judo your use the power of the patent law against itself.
The more strict the patent law is enforced the better the PPL becomes.
What we need to do is fighting patents the smart way instead of the hard way.
I think that if we continue the fight the hard way (lobing) we will have to fight it every year as long as we have a corrupt governments, which i have reason to think is as long as we use money as a payment system.
I think the smart way to handle the patent problem is to make a patent license which work with patent law as the GPL work with copyright law.
here is an example:
There is 3 players
1) The public patent foundation (PPF).
A not for money foundation which hold a collection of patents under PPL.
2) a small inventor.
3) a big corporation.
Here is how I think the public patent licence (PPL) should work.
For a inventions under PPL the following is required.
a) All other patents the invention violate must be under PPL.
b) Blueprints/Source code/technical details for the invention must be published trough the PPF.
The is also a similar Lesser PPL (LPPL).
For a inventions under LPPL the following is required.
a) All other patents by the invention violate and made by the inventor must be under PPL.
b) Blueprints/Source code/technical details for the invention must be published trough the PPF.
c) The inventor must be a member of PPF.
As a member of PPF you pay a fee which help maintain the PPF patent portfolio.
So, PPL invention is free for all while LPPL invention have some secondary patents.
Scenery.
1) The small inventor.
a) A inventor get a patent, for an invention and start to produce and sell the product. b) A big corporation start to make and sell a cheep copy. c) The small inventor call the corporation and say stop that I got a patent. d) The big corporation say your invention violates 10 of our inventions.
Please, grand back your patent or we sue you. e) The small inventor sells drops in the competition with the cheep copy,
and he can't afford to maintain hes patent. f) He donate the patent to the PPF and get a nice tax discount. g) The PPF goes to the big corporation and say your violate one of our patents, either stop making the cheap copy or get a PPL or LPPL.
All I am saying is that you should not belive CIA. Bin Laden may be an evil monster I really don't know! All the info I have on him is baised. If you have read the link you will know that 9/11 where most proberly a CIA/bush job and not Bin Laden.
Its always a joy to see someone is think for themself, so you might like to read this link befor you blame Bin Laden.
Re:Not very scientific
on
Killer Ozone?
·
· Score: 2, Funny
I think the Illuminati is trying to do for ozone / carbon oxide as they did for sodium fluoride / calcium flouride. They will have us mistake the effect of ozone for that of carbon oxide as they hade us mistake the effect of the poison sodium fluoride for the effect of calcium fluoride. See: 1 2 3
Not eigenvalues but the primary eigenvector. The comparision result in an comparison matrix M. Then if one start with a vecter v and repeat the calculation v=M*v one ends with the primary eigenvector.
Slashdot Mirror
I think there is a smart way to do this.
If the politician make a rule which says.
If an employe make a suggestion which
make the system more effective then they
get half the saving in the first year as a bonus.
Finally, we can get rid of all those terrorists
No, notice that this suggestion comes from one of the bigest terrorist cell in the world. (CIA)
No, I would like suggest that you drop you LSD habit and start taking care of yourself instead of your pusher.
There is a simple and very effective way to fight the smog.
This is by building a chembuster
So, just build one and test it out.
Hi
I would just let you know that the
terminator device at
http://www.worldwithoutparasites.org/
is say to cure HIV.
I wish you a happy healing.
Hi Patrick
;-)
I have posted some suggestions for you, but the slashdot crowd did not like concrete alternative suggestions, so unless you read at -2 you woundn't see it
The papimi device have the following centers in california why don't you test it out.
If that is correct then Patrick should be cured by now.
Wrong, doctors and the drug companies get payed to treat you, to cure you
is bad for business.
I send Patrick a mail last time with some suggestions,
but i did not get a reply, so I don't know if he got it.
My suggestions were
a terminator
Rife machine in the frequency list we find Actinomycosis..... 28, 1, 17, 20, 58
I have since learned about the PAP-IMI
As programmers we know that to optimize something
we have to have a way to measure it.
I think that a good user interface should be easy to learn and very productive.
But in most cases is easy to use (GUI's) not very productive
and very productive (like vi) is not easy to use.
So, for a ui the is tree thing to measure.
1) usability.
2) productivity.
3) the users transit time from newbie to expert.
A way to measure this would be to make a test
where you asked a user to make many similar excises.
Then the usability would relate to how fast they solved the first excises.
The productivity would relate to how fast they solved the last excises.
The transit time would be the time from the start to when the minimum excises time where reached.
Then give the same test to a group of different users to generate a representative data set.
To test a new email client you could ask the user to
isolate a specific string from each of 100 emails.
> Wouldn't it just be simpler to have no patents at all?
Yes, but this is not the reality of the world.
To win the battle this way you'll have to
have more money/time than your opposition, for lobing your government
or else the opposition will just keep trying every year, until they got there way.
I would rather spend my time programming !!
PPL is like judo your use the power of the patent law
against itself.
The more strict the patent law is enforced the better the PPL becomes.
ups, the last link should be
Books for Automatic Trading Systems
Thanks fixed.
Alternative to Amazon I have some computer related eigenpolls.
Agile Software Development Books
Best Practices for Software Development
Favorit websites
Spam Fighting Software
other books related eigenpoll are:
Alternative Science Books
Real Estate Investment books
Books on Accelerated Learning Techniques
Books for Automatic Trading Systems
What we need to do is fighting patents
the smart way instead of the hard way.
I think that if we continue the fight the hard
way (lobing) we will have to fight it every year
as long as we have a corrupt governments, which
i have reason to think is as long as we use money
as a payment system.
I think the smart way to handle the patent problem
is to make a patent license which work with patent law
as the GPL work with copyright law.
here is an example:
There is 3 players
1) The public patent foundation (PPF).
A not for money foundation which
hold a collection of patents under PPL.
2) a small inventor.
3) a big corporation.
Here is how I think the public patent licence (PPL) should work.
For a inventions under PPL the following is required.
a) All other patents the invention violate must be under PPL.
b) Blueprints/Source code/technical details for the invention must be published trough the PPF.
The is also a similar Lesser PPL (LPPL).
For a inventions under LPPL the following is required.
a) All other patents by the invention violate and made by the inventor must be under PPL.
b) Blueprints/Source code/technical details for the invention must be published trough the PPF.
c) The inventor must be a member of PPF.
As a member of PPF you pay a fee which help maintain the
PPF patent portfolio.
So, PPL invention is free for all while
LPPL invention have some secondary patents.
Scenery.
1) The small inventor.
a) A inventor get a patent, for an invention and start to produce and sell the
product.
b) A big corporation start to make and sell a cheep copy.
c) The small inventor call the corporation and say stop that I got a patent.
d) The big corporation say your invention violates 10 of our inventions.
Please, grand back your patent or we sue you.
e) The small inventor sells drops in the competition with the cheep copy,
and he can't afford to maintain hes patent.
f) He donate the patent to the PPF and get a nice tax discount.
g) The PPF goes to the big corporation and say your violate
one of our patents, either stop making the cheap copy or get a PPL or LPPL.
check this
He where relly killed by the driver.
All I am saying is that you should not belive CIA.
Bin Laden may be an evil monster I really don't know! All the info I have on him is baised.
If you have read the link you will know that 9/11 where most proberly a CIA/bush job and not Bin Laden.
Hi Ratamacue
Its always a joy to see someone is
think for themself, so you might
like to read this link
befor you blame Bin Laden.
I think the Illuminati is trying to do for ozone / carbon oxide as they did for sodium fluoride / calcium flouride. :
They will have us mistake the effect of ozone for that of carbon oxide as they hade us mistake the effect of the poison sodium fluoride for the effect of calcium fluoride. See
1
2
3
apt-get install cron-apt
Edit the config file.
That it!
You could try ddrescue or dd_rescue + dd_rhelp
Not eigenvalues but the primary eigenvector.
The comparision result in an comparison matrix M.
Then if one start with a vecter v and repeat the calculation v=M*v one ends with the primary eigenvector.
Hi
;-)
I have a eigenpoll for books on accelerated learning techniques,
in case there is anybody else which likes to get smarter as they get older
The easies way to test it is to make a Chembuster and see if it works.
Sorry, about the title it should be
Oppression of technology.