Slashdot Mirror


Kim Peek, aka Rain Man Focus of NASA Study

Bob Vila's Hammer writes "Kim Peek - an autistic man who has been deemed a "mega-savant" for his astonishing knowledge of 15 grand subjects ranging from history and literature, geography and numbers, to sports, music and dates - is a part of a new NASA study to explore the changes in his brain since MRI images were originally taken in 1988. Not only was he the basis of the main character in the movie Rain Man, but he apparently is getting smarter in his specialty areas as he gets older. The study has scientists hoping that technology used to study the effects of space travel on the brain will help explain his mental capabilities."

366 comments

  1. The article missed something. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    But he also is severely limited in other ways, like not being able to find the silverware drawer at home or dressing himself.

    What's his /. UID?

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:The article missed something. by jmmcd · · Score: 0

      the article missed something. like content.

    2. Re:The article missed something. by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 4, Funny
      What's his /. UID?

      11606, why? (You knew that was coming as soon as you posted, right ;)

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    3. Re:The article missed something. by roman_mir · · Score: 5, Funny

      98. Definitely 98.

    4. Re:The article missed something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I knew that was leaving me wide open. :)

    5. Re:The article missed something. by bfischer · · Score: 1

      Yes, they also forgot to mention the cost of the study. When asked, Kim replied "About a hundred dollars"

    6. Re:The article missed something. by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 1

      977 Bam! The future of modern rock.

    7. Re:The article missed something. by karnal · · Score: 1

      97X. :)

      --
      Karnal
    8. Re:The article missed something. by omahajim · · Score: 1
      What's his /. UID?

      11606, why?

      Would you mind explaining the in-joke to us non-savants?

    9. Re:The article missed something. by sk8king · · Score: 1

      It was the original poster's UID. Nothing more, nothing less.

    10. Re:The article missed something. by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      There is no in-joke. Everything you need to understand this joke is right in front of you.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    11. Re:The article missed something. by samberdoo · · Score: 1

      CmdrTaco of course.

    12. Re:The article missed something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not very funny, that's what's right in front of me.

    13. Re:The article missed something. by melvster · · Score: 0

      About seventy.

    14. Re:The article missed something. by omahajim · · Score: 1

      well then. I ain't laughin.

    15. Re:The article missed something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rain Man couldn't go 1 year without cable. How would he catch People's Court?

    16. Re:The article missed something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the original poster's UID :P

  2. Kim Peek not "autistic" by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Informative

    While definitely a "savant", Kim Peek is not behaviorally autistic; Rain Man's character was modified to be an autistic savant. (Autism, like many disorders, is merely a set of diagnostic criteria, and Kim may share some in common with classic autism. However, some critical benchmarks for autism are not shared, making Kim not strictly "autistic".)

    The above article and the brief wikipedia story are very interesting reads. For example, did you know that Kim was born with "an enlarged head and missing corpus callosum, the connecting tissue between the brain hemispheres, damage to the cerebellum and no anterior commissure"?

    1. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by Feynman · · Score: 5, Informative
      [D]id you know that Kim was born "missing...the connecting tissue between the brain hemispheres...?"

      According to this artice, "tests showed his brain hemispheres are not separated, forming a single, large 'data storage' area" (emphasis added).

    2. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by daveschroeder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, I've seen some references to that as well...but he's still missing the specific connection structures a normal brain has between the hemispheres. Apparently they are connected in other ways (or are simply one "piece")? One would imagine that's part of what the NASA researchers will be looking into more thoroughly.

    3. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by jd · · Score: 4, Interesting
      The diagnostic criteria for the autistic spectrum tends to be a little on the vague side, but I agree that he doesn't meet the full "official" definition.


      It may be valuable, though, to have a better understanding of how the brain processes such specialized information, especially for those who are autistic. Treatments (where they exist) tend to be haphazard experiments on the patient, with very little information on why some treatments work in some cases, others work in others, and no treatments work at all in yet others.


      Nor is it clear that everything in the "autistic spectrum" is biologically (rather than symptomatically) related. If they are unrelated, it would go a long way to explaining why the effects of medication are so unpredictable.


      As far as I can tell, very little of the mechanics of autism has been researched. The cause is uncertain, though likely to have a genetic component. What that component is, and how significant it is, seems to be completely unknown. There may be environmental factors (MMR vaccines have been looked at with suspicion, for example), but that too is so uncertain as to be mere whistling in the dark.


      The NASA research is unlikely to answer any of these questions, but may provide some clues as to how to get answers in future, and hopefully will inspire researchers to actually do the basic research needed.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    4. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
      As far as I can tell, very little of the mechanics of autism has been researched. The cause is uncertain, though likely to have a genetic component. What that component is, and how significant it is, seems to be completely unknown. There may be environmental factors (MMR vaccines have been looked at with suspicion, for example), but that too is so uncertain as to be mere whistling in the dark.

      That is often said, but it just isn't true anymore. The massively deficient and elevated levels of metals in the bodies of autistics is well documented. An autistic has an array of known biochemistry and physiological symptoms. About 99% of cases of autism appear to be caused by heavy metal poisoning insulting the development or function of the brain (there is a perfect overlap between the symptoms of heavy metal poisoning and autism -- because they are the same thing). Some parents are now managing to fully de-autistify their children by chelating mercury and lead. There can be other causes, but they're rare.

      Oh, the MMR vaccine does not cause autism. It might've had a minor negative effect in some individuals that were already going to become autistic though. Apart from some very rare reactions, it seems very doubtful that vaccines cause autism. Although it does seem to me that the heavy metal and other chemical preservatives used in many vaccines may have encouraged the development of autism in vulnerable individuals.
    5. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by robertjw · · Score: 1

      For example, did you know that Kim was born with "an enlarged head...

      My mother always said I had an enlarged head...

    6. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by dacarr · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's Aspergers, or somethign like it? Obviously, I am not a doctor.

      --
      This sig no verb.
    7. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I heard stories (from my highschool science teacher) about people who've had the connecting tissue between brain hemispheres separated surgically. Apparently the left side of the body and the right side of the body act independently from each other. The right arm would try to do something and the left arm would stop it, etc.

    8. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having a big head isn't too helpful. I have a big head and I can't remember shit!

    9. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by sl3xd · · Score: 5, Informative

      While definitely a "savant", Kim Peek is not behaviorally autistic; Rain Man's character was modified to be an autistic savant.

      This is true, but it's worth noting that the movie was based around Kim Peek. I've actually met Kim Peek (and his father, Kim didn't live by himself at the time), he's quite a fellow. Apparently Kim was having trouble getting medical care due to both insurance indifference and government beaurocracy, and Dustin Hoffman (who played the savant in the movie) moved mountains to help out Kim. I've also met people with classic autism -- while a psycologist may differ on the strictness of the definition, to the layman it's the same thing. Still, the opprotunity for education is appreciated.

      It's still neat to ask Kim about a little blink-by-town in the middle of nowhere, and he's able to tell you about the area with enough detail that it seems as if he's been there before. (He liked to study maps at one point in time, and no matter how long ago it was, he still remembers perfectly). As long as we stayed in the guidelines set by his father (mainly talking about Kim's areas of interest -- and hence knowledge), he played a perfect game of 'stump the dummy.' (The term originates from one of my engineering professors, referring to Q&A sessions where students ask him questions about their homework, and has nothing to do with Kim Peek. Half the fun of the game was getting the professor to say "I don't know". When talking to Kim Peeks, this never happened.)

      It'll be interesting ot see what the study finds.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    10. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If autism were caused by lead poisoning, it would affect males and females equally, it doesn't. Males have it 6 x more frequently than females. The prevailing theory is that testosterone, which is neurotoxic, affects the left side of the developing fetuses brain, (the left side developes more slowly). There is more to than this such as migrating purkinje cells etc. that I can't go into right now.

    11. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Sounds more like a specific-to-him birth defect in the brain, from the article. Asperger's is higher level functioning than this- I've got Asperger's and not only can I find the silverware drawer, but also the disk that is under the 2" stack of papers on my desk, as long as nobody has attempted to "tidy up" after me. Nope- Kim is someplace on the autistic spectrum, as is anybody with some savant and some retarded abilities, but is definately too low functioning to be Asperger's. Despite advanced degrees in 15 subjects.

      In addition, MRI scans of my brain don't show the additional connections this guy has (I've had them done, repeatedly, in an attempt to find better medication for my sensory overload problems that result in my most disabling symptom; migraines). For me, my Asperger's is likely just learned behavior avoiding social and environmental situations that cause major pain; where this guy simply has a brain that is wired differently from anybody else on the planet.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    12. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, lead can cause autism and it still does not need to affect males and females in equal quantity, because males may be more susceptible to the effects of the heavy metal poisoning.

    13. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're one of the few who doesn't use Asperger's as some sort of all-encompassing excuse for all kinds of behavior, and on top of it, you admit it might be learned. Thank you. You have restored my faith in that diagnosis.
      I knew this guy ('knew' because I want nothing to do with him anymore) who would behave in the most atrocious, self-serving and maniplulative ways, and use Asperger's to absolve himself from responsibility, AND play the victim!!!
      That's why I'm very suspicious of people who claim to have Asperger's. I fit the description much more than my ex-friend. I guess he just latched on to this 'disease of the year' to get what he wanted.

    14. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by relaxrelax · · Score: 5, Informative

      The massive lack of metallothionein in autism (one of the metal detox pathways) does mean higher levels of metals and therefore heavy metal poisoning in 99% of cases; but however you can't claim autism is the same as heavy metal poisoning!!!

      For starters, metal poisoning does NOT always imply lack of metallothionein or autistic behavior, and only mercury poisoning would somewhat approach autism symptoms... superficially!

      Also autism does not always mean metal poisoning. Some autistics have simply not been exposed to enough metals to be poisonned and they're quite autistic - the poison dart frog active substance in their blood and all that without metal poisoning. Autistics with the least metal poisoning have a tendency NOT to be deficient in sulfur like 75% of autistics (in a study by Dr. Waring). Sulfur deficiency is a marker of mercury poisoning, as mercury has affinity for most sulfur groups in the body and therefore damages sulfur metabolism.

      The MMR vaccine is the only vaccine to have a serious connection to autism, but it's like 0.04% of cases and not 99% as Wakefield believed at some point... and it's a delayed effect. Other vaccines don't CAUSE autism, but could certainly account for chance of early diagnosis because of plainly obvious mercury damage and ADD/dyslexia type problems.

      Difference between autistic children of today with the next generation of children that are now on non-mercury (but aluminium preservative) vaccines is gonna be quite instructive, look for it when it shows up...

      The mercury poisoning (quite a common disease among autistics with mercury fillings) is but one of the issues (lead and arsenic kills people too, you know). You CAN'T de-autistify someone with chelation, but curing metal poisoning can raise their IQ just like in non-autistic who are lead poisonned. Then they don't SEEM autistic as much, but still function extremely differently from other people when you look at the details.

      In short, high IQ allows autistics to "pretent to be normal" by learning normal behavior and acting it with good actor skills. You can find all about it in a book called "pretending to be normal".

      By the way, here is another savant (with autistic traits, but possibly not completely autistic). This one is a top 10 mathematician in history according to many.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erdos

      Some autistic links: neurodiversity.com

      I recommend the neurodiversity.com section called "murder of autistics" for a good, true, opinion-diverse, very disturbing read.

      --
      Microsoft is pure dog-ma. FreeBSD is pure cat-ma.
    15. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by dumol · · Score: 1

      You've got to be kidding. I used to work with autistic people, if only things would be so simple as you see them...

      --
      I started with nothing and still have most of it left.
    16. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      The mercury poisoning (quite a common disease among autistics with mercury fillings) is but one of the issues (lead and arsenic kills people too, you know). You CAN'T de-autistify someone with chelation, but curing metal poisoning can raise their IQ just like in non-autistic who are lead poisonned. Then they don't SEEM autistic as much, but still function extremely differently from other people when you look at the details.

      In short, high IQ allows autistics to "pretent to be normal" by learning normal behavior and acting it with good actor skills. You can find all about it in a book called "pretending to be normal".
      That just isn't necessarily true. I had asperger's syndrome from a young age, not minorly either (obsessions, hypersensitivity, etc). But no more. I'm an ex-autistic now, so no theorising about it being impossible to cure is going to hold water with me, when I have an in-depth personal understanding of how my neurological function has increased over the last couple of years that I've been chelating and treating myself. This has not been from 'increased I.Q.', my deep brain function has really been de-autisified. Social adeptivity is no problem for me now, I can even do ''small talk''.

      How much an individual is able to recover from autism depends on how they are autistic. If they're autistic because of brain damage during early development, then that is going to be mostly irreversable. If they're autistic because of an ongoing physical problem, then they may be able to reverse their autistism to a degree, like what I did.
    17. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      You're one of the few who doesn't use Asperger's as some sort of all-encompassing excuse for all kinds of behavior, and on top of it, you admit it might be learned. Thank you. You have restored my faith in that diagnosis.

      Well- uh, I have been known to do that- but I do limit it to the 10 basic symptoms list. Unfortuneately for me- I exhibit 10/10, at least internally- I fight against it as much as possible.

      I knew this guy ('knew' because I want nothing to do with him anymore) who would behave in the most atrocious, self-serving and maniplulative ways, and use Asperger's to absolve himself from responsibility, AND play the victim!!!

      Sounds more like NT behavior than anything AC to me- most ACs dislike their own behavior and work against it as much as is possible (but of course, fail...).

      That's why I'm very suspicious of people who claim to have Asperger's. I fit the description much more than my ex-friend. I guess he just latched on to this 'disease of the year' to get what he wanted.

      It's amazing to me that this became disease of the year- likely due to that series of Wired articles a couple of years back. It's almost as strange as the grunge movement- which had it's own autistic overtones. Like Kurt Cobain said "When did what I wear become styleish?". My own diagnosis didn't come until age 30- and even then, it just seemed like an explaination of what already was. At least it helped to get me some good meds for the migraines- and it's helping to get my 17-month-old son early intervention, so maybe he won't be as phobic about dentists, the sun, parties and loud, multicolored celebrations as I am.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    18. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by pmsr · · Score: 3, Funny
      So, that explains Dr. Strangelove behaviour.

      /Pedro

    19. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by teromajusa · · Score: 2, Informative

      About 99% of cases of autism appear to be caused by heavy metal poisoning insulting the development or function of the brain (there is a perfect overlap between the symptoms of heavy metal poisoning and autism -- because they are the same thing).

      Appear to whom? This has not been born out by studies. Currently the only evidence in support of the metal poisoning theory I've seen are from people selling chelation therapy. If you know of any scientific studies to support this I'd love to see them.

    20. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by mr_jrt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thats interesting...I have a scarily good long term memory (I'm talking entire conversations from years ago, huge amounts of facts as well as pointless trivia, etc.), but I can't for the life of me do anything that involves moving my limbs too independantly, (i.e. even to begin to play instruments like guitars and drums). Maybe I just have slightly better connection between my hemispheres which increases memory ability at a detriment to motor skills.

      Then again, there's a fairly good chance everything is coincidence. Still though, an interesting thing to muse over.

      --
      Boo.
    21. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by Ho-Lee-Cow! · · Score: 1

      The MMR vaccine is the only vaccine to have a serious connection to autism, but it's like 0.04% of cases and not 99% as Wakefield believed at some point... and it's a delayed effect. Other vaccines don't CAUSE autism, but could certainly account for chance of early diagnosis because of plainly obvious mercury damage and ADD/dyslexia type problems.

      Other childhood vaccines, until very recently, contained thimerisol and other mercury salts. even in the minute amounts present in vaccines, they pose a problem, especially in the developing neural pathways of kids. As I remember, the MMR is not preserved with those agents, but the problem was thought to possibly be in the culturing process of the MMR itself.

      --
      In space, no one can hear you moo.
    22. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Stop. Stop stop stop. Just because you make it sound nice doesn't mean it's true. Start referencing what you're talking about, and I don't mean webMD.com. 99 percent??

      From J Child Neurol. 2004 Jun;19(6):431-4.

      Mercury exposure in children with autistic spectrum disorder: case-control study.

      Ip P, Wong V, Ho M, Lee J, Wong W.

      Division of Neurodevelopmental Paediatrics, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

      Although mercury has been proven to be a neurotoxicant, there is a lack of data to evaluate the causal relationship between mercury and autism. We aim to see if there is increased mercury exposure in children with autistic spectrum disorder. We performed a cross-sectional cohort study over a 5-month period in 2000 to compare the hair and blood mercury levels of children with autistic spectrum disorder (n = 82; mean age 7.2 years) and a control group of normal children (n = 55; mean age 7.8 years). There was no difference in the mean mercury levels. The mean blood mercury levels of the autistic and control groups were 19.53 and 17.68 nmol/L, respectively (P = .15), and the mean hair mercury levels of the autistic and control groups were 2.26 and 2.07 ppm, respectively (P = .79). Thus, the results from our cohort study with similar environmental mercury exposure indicate that there is no causal relationship between mercury as an environmental neurotoxin and autism.


      There's another good article (J Child Neurol. 2004 Jun;19(6):413-7.) where they look at the actual genetic polymorphisms of genes normally involved in metal transport in the body. Out of all the genes they looked at, 2 (!) were found to be different between autistic families and regular families. One of them wasn't even significantly different (p=0.07).

      To basically draw the conclusion that all autism is caused by heavy metal poisoning is totally space-case. It may be involved, but clearly the research is still in its infancy (there aren't even any Cochrane Reviews out on the subject), and until it's published, DON'T QUOTE IT!

    23. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by venicebeach · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are other connections besides the corpus callosum and anterior commisure in a normal brain. There is also the hippocampal commissure, as well as the massa intermedia connecting the thalami (although not everybody has this). But it's important to keep in mind that while the corpus callosum and anterior commissure connect the cerebral cortex on both sides, subcortically the brain is unified, and information can transfer down there, say at the level of the midbrain. Also, people born with callosal agenesis are not all that bad at transfering information from one hemisphere to another (compared with someone who has their CC cut later in life) suggesting they use these other channels more efficiently.

    24. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Some parents are now managing to fully de-autistify their children by chelating mercury and lead

      Cite to a peer-reviewed medical journal, please? Alternately, wild-ass conspiracy theories will paint this picture a little clearer as well...

    25. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by Niebieski · · Score: 1

      For example, did you know that Kim was born with "an enlarged head and missing corpus callosum, the connecting tissue between the brain hemispheres, damage to the cerebellum and no anterior commissure"? This is the case for more than 10% of the population... nothing fancy here.

    26. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The MMR vaccine is the only vaccine to have a serious connection to autism, but it's like 0.04% of cases and not 99% as Wakefield believed at some point..

      Wakefield's sample size was 12 children immunized with MMR, of which eight were autistic. His findings were of an increased level of the measles virus, in an attempt to explain the endemic gastrointestinal problems autistics have. Wakefield himself never indicated the vaccine, and
      confirmed that with a larger sample size, there was no significant correlation.

      Check out
      http://www.economist.com/science/displayStory .cfm? story_id=2459156 for a good rundown on the whole MMR meme (hey, they use the term) and an interesting note on Wakefield's apparent conflict of interest in the matter.

    27. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kim Peek is the result of one of the many secret research programs carried out in the late '40s and '50s.

      Just like the Syphilis studies carried out on innocent and unsuspecting blacks in Tuskegee, the Mormons were also an easy target for the boys at the Pentagon back in those days.

      Just as they carried out secret mind control and LSD experiments on unsuspecting and innocent Canadians at the Penfield Center in Montreal.

      Ken Jennings and Kim Peek are both Mormon and both from north western Utah. Kim Peek is the result of early failed experiments (1950's). Ken Jennings is the direct result of the continuing progress and success of MKULTRA (1970's).

      God Bless Ken Jennings, the happy result of directed evolution.

      For everything you never wanted to know on the subject, simply google MKULTRA.

    28. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness, don't we all pretend to be normal? Most social interaction is learned behavior. Normality isn't some objective quality that can be measured quantitatively, rather it's an agreed upon set of rules for behavior. (Not agreed upon on paper, although some "normal" things are reinforced by laws). Most people have thoughts, ideas, and feelings that would be qualified as abnormal behavior were they carried out -- we just don't act on them.

    29. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called evil hand syndrome. The surgery was done to prevent seizures. It's apparently not a problem unless you stop sensory perception of one side of the body, such as covering one eye. Then for all practical purposes, the two sides really are independent, and act differently.

    30. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do a search for Phineas Gage. He was a railway worker who was injured in an explosion; a large metal bar struck him in the head (actually, it went through) and damaged his corpus callosum (IIRC). The man lived, but behaved strangely, got angry very easily and had problems with impulse control.

    31. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by owlstead · · Score: 2, Funny

      After saying all that, can you actually still read the 'C' on your keyboard?

    32. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by jd · · Score: 1
      Pretending to be normal works to a limited extent. However, autistic people often have sensory overload and it gets very hard to behave "normally" under such conditions.


      In addition, people classed as "low-functioning" or "high-functioning" autistic (as opposed to Aspergers, which I have) often have further limitations in their ability to comprehend social dynamics.


      Provided you work within those limitations, sure, you can "act normal". But you HAVE to recognise those limitations. People do try to ignore them, but that just doesn't work. If you get overloaded, and don't acknowledge that fact, you will stop being able to function very quickly.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    33. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by jd · · Score: 1

      Testosterone is neurotoxic... hmmm. That would explain a lot about beach-bum body-builders...

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    34. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 1

      I don't believe Gage suffered any damage to his CC. I was always told the damage was centralised on his left frontal lobe, but this webpage talks about a variety of possible damage scenarios.

      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    35. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by Baseclass · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It's actually called alien hand syndrome, and may be the result of a stroke, a brain infection, or surgery.

      My wife and I watched a documentary on this condition several years ago. It's been used occassionaly (as an inside joke) to explain away uncalled for lude behavior...usually on my part ;)

      --
      ^^vv<><>BA
    36. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The role of heavy metals in autism seems to be
      heavily over emphasized. Savant like gifts are
      very common, even in high functioning autism.
      Look at many of the worlds great scientists and
      you will find clearly autistic childhoods, speech
      delay, fascination with things instead of people,
      etc. yet when you look at victims of heavy metal
      poisoning one doesn't find these populations
      generating exceptional numbers of savants.

      Autism involves hundreds if not thousands of
      metabolic differences. It is not as simple as
      the pet theories would often have you believe.

      Autism could be looked at as the engineering genes
      taken to an extreme. Virtually all good engineers
      have atleast a smattering of autistic traits, and
      a fair number would atleast as children have fit
      the current diagnostic criteria for autism.

      I would strongly recommend that any autistic
      adults reading this give L-Carnosine a try
      500-1000mg. It changed my life.

    37. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by relaxrelax · · Score: 1


      Your brain stem will still be 1/6 of the size it should be, chelation or not. That's 99% of autistics (as listed in Scientific American. Search for Susan Bryson).

      Of course without the colateral damage, you can cope with it rather well; better than the

      But can you recognize eye language competently?

      Your autistic base strenghts, as well as the base weaknesses, are as intact as mine. We're now out of a diagnosis, but we work very differently internally. There are a battery of tests to prove it.

      --
      Microsoft is pure dog-ma. FreeBSD is pure cat-ma.
    38. Re:Kim Peek not "autistic" by relaxrelax · · Score: 1


      Mercury causes brain damage. There is the Minamata, Japan case to prove it beyond all doubt, as well as those fish advisories that won't allow you to eat fish with a fraction of the mercury you'd get in a vaccine or amalgam.

      Among others the mercury miner tragedies have left plenty of evidence, and some of those people are still alive, that mercury does NOT cause autism. At any age or stage of developpement.

      In fact, the Minamata case HAD NO RISE IN AUTISM. Autism rates were surprisingly low. Such a statistical anomaly would point to the unability of autistics to detoxify mercury... (i.e. many more than normal could have died before statistics were made). This correlates with the Amy Holmes study of autistic hair. Of course the "autism makes mercury detoxification weaker than normal" part is a bit theorical, but no study has shown mercury to be a CAUSE of autism. Even if some vaccines are suspect.

      Yet you'll still find chelation doctors claim a cure for autism, and mercury as the "obvious" cause of "most" autism. Because that claim outsells truth 100 to 1. Because families want a "cure" for autism rather than a cure for all the secondary problems of mercury poisoning.

      Added to that, asperger diagnosis are partly a fad; most people with the diagnosis ARE asperger, but those who aren't... including a few people who fake it rather than think it... are so much trouble and so much manipulations of those with the real asperger! The fox in the poultry house. Ya know?

      --
      Microsoft is pure dog-ma. FreeBSD is pure cat-ma.
  3. Cliche by mboverload · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can we make a beowulf cluster of him?

    1. Re:Cliche by kfg · · Score: 1, Funny

      Can we make a beowulf cluster of him?

      Would you believe that Clonaid already has?

      Ok, then would you believe that we could get AP to pick up the 'story'?

      Ok, then would believe we could get Cowboy Neal to believe it and post it the /. front page?

      Well, Ok, then how about Hymie is a beowulf cluster, but he can't find the silverware drawer either?

      KFG

    2. Re:Cliche by Indras · · Score: 1

      Can we make a beowulf cluster of him?

      You need to read A Signal Shattered by Eric S. Nylund. I don't want to reveal too much, but a major plotline involves making a beowulf cluster of human minds. Very well written too.

      He also wrote the first and third of the Halo book series. They are the only ones worth reading imo, because the second book (by William Dietz) is basically a play-by-play of the game. Incredibly boring and repetitive (Master chief fires his gun at the enemy, then fires at another, then fires at another. Then, he reloads, and throws a grenade. etc etc), and you might as well just go play the game.

      Anyway, Eric's ideas in A Signal Shattered are fantastic, and he actually realizes that computers aren't going to stay separate from people and combined to number-crunching tasks, but will eventually be integrated with people as an extension of themselves. Really a great read.

      --
      The speed of time is one second per second.
  4. Yeah,but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...Ken Jennings is a genius at every subject.

  5. The real question is... by NarrMaster · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...how many queens are there?

    --
    That's right. All your base.
    1. Re:The real question is... by NarrMaster · · Score: 1

      Crack-head mods obviously haven't watched Rain Man.
      Offtopic, indeed.

      --
      That's right. All your base.
  6. conspiracy theory 26 by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe NASA is too lazy to count stars in Hubble images for density studies, and hope this dude can do it in one shot.

    1. Re:conspiracy theory 26 by photozz · · Score: 2, Informative

      After reading the article, that may actualy be a posibility. He has memorized, on first read, over 7600 books. jesus.

      --


      Dirty Pirate Hooker
    2. Re:conspiracy theory 26 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > After reading the article, that may actualy be a posibility. He has memorized, on first read, over 7600 books. jesus.


      Reading the article?

      Who are you? And why are you here on /.?
    3. Re:conspiracy theory 26 by pilgrim23 · · Score: 3, Funny

      He can recall about 8000 books so he should be well grounded for other uses. NASA's next project is to have him generate an unending supply of position papers, mission statements, focus group study documentation, and other totally meaningless paperwork to account for all the $800 toilet seats. Peak is flushed with anticipation at the prospect...

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    4. Re:conspiracy theory 26 by nomadicGeek · · Score: 1

      Conspiracy theory 27

      Actually I think that they are too lazy to count Columbia pieces and hope he can do it in one shot.

    5. Re:conspiracy theory 26 by HeadachesAbound · · Score: 1

      NASA intends to use the neural map of his brain to build the next supercomputer in order to regain the top spot and predict the outcome of all Jeopardy games until 3025.

    6. Re:conspiracy theory 26 by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      I hope he never reads slash.

      His super powers would drain away and his cape would turn that nasty dark shades, and probably start drinking heavily.

      Happens to the best of us..

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    7. Re:conspiracy theory 26 by kzinti · · Score: 1

      He has memorized ... over 7600 books.

      Yeah, but I wonder what his level of understanding of those books is. Is there a quantity vs quality tradeoff going on there?

    8. Re:conspiracy theory 26 by demachina · · Score: 1

      Isn't it cool how NASA has time and money to do all this cool research that doesn't really have anything to do with a space program other than their overreaching attempts to make it sound like it does.

      Please, please, please take all of NASA's manned space program budget and give it to Burt Rutan(the closest modern equivalent we seem to have to the Skunkwork's Kelly Johnson), no strings attached, so he can build a reusable space craft so we all can start flying to space as routinely as we fly cross country now.

      Not sure he'd take the money since he despises big government in general, and NASA in particular, but if he had a good pool of money he would make things happen. By the way he seems to despise Boeing and Lockheed about as much as NASA.

      --
      @de_machina
  7. Put this dude on Jeopardy!!! by sssmashy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe he could give Ken a run for his money. Also, I'd love to see some "rain man" style banter with Alex as an alternative to the usual tepid small talk.

    1. Re:Put this dude on Jeopardy!!! by SpermanHerman · · Score: 0

      Jeopardy is on at 10. Can't miss Jeopardy; it's on at 10. ahhhhHHHHHHHHHHhh.

  8. I welcome by mboverload · · Score: 4, Funny

    I welcome our new autistic all-knowing overlords.

    1. Re:I welcome by putzin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can someone with autism truly manage to be an overlord? So, wouldn't it be more like the following?

      I welcome our new all-knowing autistic differently-abled buddies who may or may not take over after someone helps them get dressed and eat breakfast.
      --
      Bah
    2. Re:I welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Can someone with autism truly manage to be an overlord?"

      Definitely.

    3. Re:I welcome by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      I welcome our new autistic all-knowing overlords.

      Already done. Remember the TV debates?:

      "Definitely justified in invading Iraq. Definitely! Right thing to do, definitely right thing. Fight terrorists there instead of here. Definitely over there. Definitely there!"

  9. Goal by mphase · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "The goal is to measure what happens in Kim's brain when he expresses things and when he thinks about them."

    Personally I'd be curious to look at the difference in his brain activity when he is dealing with one of his specialities as opposed to when he is trying to find a spoon.

    1. Re:Goal by Timesprout · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dude, there is no spoon.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:Goal by skwirl42 · · Score: 1

      Only realize that there is no spoon.

    3. Re:Goal by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1
      One of my favorite Alex Trabek moments was on a celebrity Jeopardy match with Jon Lovitz and two others whom I have since forgotten. The category was something like "The Sea" and the answer was something like "noted for having eight tentacles." When no one buzzed in Trabek looked at all of them like they were morons, before giving them the answer like he would to a four year old. Lovitz replied along the lines of, "Sure its easy for you, you get all the answers. Next time you can stand here and I'll read the answer."

      So yeah. Guess you had to be there...

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    4. Re:Goal by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1
      Those are always classic. Making fun of Tom Cruise and Jeff Goldblum are always fun. Having Sean Connery as a repeat player 100% of the time is great too.

      "I'll take Famous Titties for 100"

      "That's, Famous Titles."

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

    5. Re:Goal by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      I think he was talking about actual Celebrity Jeopardy, not the SNL skit. The real thing isn't as funny, because it's so sad.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    6. Re:Goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you're a retard

    7. Re:Goal by karnal · · Score: 1

      Who could forget the "Anal Bum Cover" category? Or the "Penis Mightier"....

      --
      Karnal
    8. Re:Goal by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

      Dude, there is no spoon.

      Wow, there's the answer. This guy knows way too much; he must have some direct connection to the databases which store knowledge in the Matrix. Yet he can't find the spoon since the spoon is a construct of the matrix and isn't real... woah.

      When they run an MRI on him, they're gonna see a big metal spike in his brain.

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    9. Re:Goal by Control+Group · · Score: 1
      But why the bowl, Timesprout?

      Why the bowl?

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    10. Re:Goal by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      The Really Big Question is if we are able to determine how he does what he does, and can reproduce it chemically in other people through medication, would you take the pill?

      What if you weren't given a choice...

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    11. Re:Goal by Keith+Maniac · · Score: 2, Funny


      I'll take "Famous Titties" for 100.

      That's "Titles", not "Titties"...

    12. Re:Goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When they run an MRI on him, they're gonna see a big metal spike in his brain.

      If he *did* have something metal in his brain, I'd guess it would be very inadvisable to run a MAGNETIC resonance imaging scan on it. Do you know how strong those magnets are?

  10. Smarter or more knowlegeable? by RealAlaskan · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ... he apparently is getting smarter in his specialty areas as he gets older.

    Smarter or more knowlegeable? If he maintains his fascination in those areas, why would we imagine that he wouldn't gain knowlege?

    Smarter would mean something like ``better able to reason with a given set of information.''

    Since the article is on CNN, I suppose that we shouldn't expect any sort of detail or sense, and not much fact, either.

    1. Re:Smarter or more knowlegeable? by zx75 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      More knowledgable certainly, but entirely possible to be smarter as well. With his amazing accumulation of knowledge, if he is able to reason and answer questions as quickly as he used to, then one must assume he is also getting smarter because indexing and sorting much more data in the same amount of time would represent a large increase in performance.

      Man, I had a hard time typing like that, I detest discussing someone as if they were a machine, but I could think of no better way to make my point.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    2. Re:Smarter or more knowlegeable? by sv0f · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Smarter or more knowlegeable?

      Depends how you define "smart". If you equate it with "intelligence" as studied by psychometricians, then it is common to distinguish two forms.

      If he maintains his fascination in those areas, why would we imagine that he wouldn't gain knowlege?

      "Crystallized" intelligence is roughly speaking the amount of knowledge you have. You're right, this should increase with age, or more generally with experience.

      Smarter would mean something like ``better able to reason with a given set of information.''

      "Fluid" intelligence is roughly speaking the flexibility of thinking, and is measured by having people solve novel problems that don't depend (much) on prior knowledge, culture background, etc. The canonical example is Ravens Progressive Matrices test.

      It's fluid intelligence that you're thinking of, and that I think of too, when the word "intelligence" or "smarts" is used. Fluid intelligence is correlated with things like working memory capacity: how much information you can store and process at the same time -- roughly your "cognitive throughput".

      In general, crystallized intelligence increases (or can increase) with age/experience. However, fluid intelligence (and related constructs such as working memory capacity) actually declines in the elderly.

      The two forms of intelligence are likely subserved by different cortical networks in the brain -- and this is probably relevant given that the article mentions the use of MRI -- but this is the subject of another post!

    3. Re:Smarter or more knowlegeable? by booch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't believe there's anything to suggest that an increase in the amount of knowledge a person holds has any correlation to how long it takes him to index and sort that information. I think you've ascribed a machine limitation to a human, which might not be the case.

      Hmm, now that I think about that, perhaps this man's brain holds the key to the NP-complete question.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    4. Re:Smarter or more knowlegeable? by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      I'm interested to see if there is a limit to what the brain can remember. I have heard things that suggest that. While I don't know if this will be answered, it'll be interesting to see the results of this study.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    5. Re:Smarter or more knowlegeable? by TGK · · Score: 1

      Assumption: The human brain stores data in some physical format (neurons, synapses, etc). The exact physical mechanism is not of consequence.

      Assumption: The human brain moves information as a series of electrical pulses. These are likely analog in nature.

      Assertion: If data is stored in a physical format, it must therefore have all the properties of a physical object, that is to say it must have a location, a "where" if you will.

      Assertion: We know that certain processing centers of the brain (speech, sight, specific cognitive functions) have a location in the brain as well.

      Assertion: In order for the brain to make cognitive decisions about specific information, data must either enter these regions or signals from these regions must pass through the data regions, otherwise no connection between data and logic is possible. How this occurs is immaterial.

      Assertion: If communication between logic and data portions of the brain is necessary for logical and academic thought, and both of these things are located in specific portions of the brain, there must be some way for the brain to select information and route is properly. How this happens is interesting, but immaterial.

      Assertion: Any routing mechanism in the brain must join two locations within the brain, and as such must have a way to tell where in the brain both data and logic centers are. This requires either hard wired connections (which should be the same across all human brains) or some form of indexing system.

      Assertion: Baring quantum processes, searching a mass of data (be that routing data or just choosing the right path in the first place) takes time. More data == more time.

      The human brain may have a lot to teach us about computing power or specialty applications, but it does not have any magical properties which allow it to sequence data or store it in some sort of ephemeral dimension.

      Indeed the human brain may hold the key to the NP-complete question -- throw lots of computing power at it and hope for the best. Either that, or try methods that work most of the time, and develop strong methods of dealing with failure.

      Indeed, perhaps the ability of the human eye to be fooled by optical illusions is an example of the use of heuristics in the brain.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    6. Re:Smarter or more knowlegeable? by Control+Group · · Score: 1
      I don't think I'm understanding you correctly - do you actually mean that you're unsure if there exists a limit to the amount of things the brain can remember?

      I don't think that's anything like an open question. There is a finite number of states the brain can take on, which automatically puts an upper bound on how much information it can possibly contain. The effective limit is presumably orders of magnitude lower (since a vast number of those states involve the brain being dead or otherwise non-functional), of course, but I don't think there's any question as to whether or not a limit exists.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    7. Re:Smarter or more knowlegeable? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Smarter would mean something like ``better able to reason with a given set of information.''

      "Normal" people learn throughout their life. Not only does learning add knowledge, but it adds (or retains relative to peers) intelligence. That is, an active brain continues to build pathways while aging. I see no reason why he wouldn't follow the same pattern. So I suspect that it is both.

      Since the article is on CNN, I suppose that we shouldn't expect any sort of detail or sense, and not much fact, either.

      If I had a mod point right now, I'd have just modded you down, rather than respond. If CNN is so worthless, why are you even bothering to respond? After all, they can't get any facts straight. Do you go to Fox News for your "facts?"

    8. Re:Smarter or more knowlegeable? by Wescotte · · Score: 1

      More knowledgable certainly, but entirely possible to be smarter as well. With his amazing accumulation of knowledge, if he is able to reason and answer questions as quickly as he used to, then one must assume he is also getting smarter because indexing and sorting much more data in the same amount of time would represent a large increase in performance.

      Man, I had a hard time typing like that, I detest discussing someone as if they were a machine, but I could think of no better way to make my point.


      While I don't detest disccusing someone as if they were a machine I do agree it it has to do with how you index/sort and search.

      I tend to think of the brain as a database. Each person creates their tables based on genetics, interests, and experiences.

      In the case of an autistic person they create more sub tables for detail on everything they see/hear vs general information. Hence the ability to memorize pretty much every book he ever read.

      In a "normal" person I tend to think more of the brain is focused on storing more general information to be able to cope with every situation rather than focusing on specifics. Generally I don't think an autistic person worries about what they have to wear in the morning or what other people think of them.

      It brings me to conclude that we nearly have the same capacity for storage in our brains it's just what is choosen to store is very different. In autisic people I consider mostly of it is genetics simply choosing ones interests and actively storing more data on them.

    9. Re:Smarter or more knowlegeable? by booch · · Score: 1

      You are making an assumption that each piece of information is stored as a discrete bit. I think it has been established that the brain stores information in a more holistic method, distributed across many neurons. So perhaps every piece of information is stored in all the neurons in a certain area of the brain. If that's the case, then getting a bunch of information from all those neurons shouldn't take much longer than getting one piece of information.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    10. Re:Smarter or more knowlegeable? by sv0f · · Score: 3, Informative

      [Proof elided.]

      Your argument is not correct.

      The paradox of the expert is this: How can experts have both (1) more knowledge of a domain and (2) faster access to each element of that knowledge?

      Cognitive psychologists began answering this question forty years ago, with De Groot's work in the 1960s and Chase and Simon's work in the early 1970s on chess experts. The answer is to notice that the acquisition of knowledge is typically accompanied by the acquisition of better indices on that knowledge. Or, said another way, you get credit for knowing something when (1) you have stored it somewhere in your long-term memory and (2) you can recall it when it is appropriate. Research since the 1970s has applied these early insights to many other domains besides chess, such as reading X-rays.

      Another way to think of this is that memories are more akin to hashtables than trees or lists. With the right hash function (i.e., indexing scheme), any single item can be retrieved in constant time. [Think also of radix sort versus comparison-based sorting algorithms.]

    11. Re:Smarter or more knowlegeable? by lux55 · · Score: 1

      The machine comparison is a good one, as it clearly distinguishes between intelligence and memory. Intelligence does not mean how much you can remember or how much you know, but the judgement and use of that knowledge. So, to put it in machine terms, a machine isn't any "smarter" with a full hard drive than an empty one.

    12. Re:Smarter or more knowlegeable? by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1
      Man, I had a hard time typing like that, I detest discussing someone as if they were a machine, but I could think of no better way to make my point.

      Hundred years ago, he'd be in a circus side-show. 500 years ago, he'd be locked in a monestary dungeon.

      --
      I suggest you read Slashdot
    13. Re:Smarter or more knowlegeable? by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      I don't think it's better indices, I think it's more indices, with sub-indices. (Boy, 'indices' sure looks silly.)

      I think of it as a tree, and most knowledge of most people is under things like, oh, 'car stuff'. Whereas a car expert will have a 'car stuff', but no knowledge in it, he's have sub categories of 'types of cars sorted by engine', 'types of cars sorted by crappiness', 'types of Fords', 'car parts', 'the oil circulation system of cars', etc, etc.

      Now, once you get into each index, it may, indeed, stored different ways. But there is a tree.

      That's the thing about savants...they can create an index in real time, somehow. If they know about trains, you can ask them to tell you the longest name of a train, and they can almost immediately.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    14. Re:Smarter or more knowlegeable? by TGK · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying that we necessarily have a n^2 or even log(n) method of retreiving data in the human brain. I'm just saying that it's an inescapable law that it takes more time to sort through more data. The only exception I am aware of is the hash table, which compensates time with space.

      While this may account for the very small portion of the human brain we use, it does not adequately explain the existance of savants.

      The exact structure the brain uses will likely never be known to us. It is significant to note that the recolection process takes time for less frequently used bits of information (cache? paging?).

      The purpose of the above was simply to assert that the brain doesn't store things in a magicaly accessable area with 0 access time. I've no idea how it actualy stores, save to note that's it's not magical.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
  11. Do it yourself by wombatmobile · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Be your own savant for a little while... with magnets. Really! Maybe.

    1. Re:Do it yourself by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      But we all want to know: Can it work in reverse, and switch on people skills?

  12. I wonder if he is in anyway related... by SithLordOfLanc · · Score: 0

    ... to Ken Jennings (the $2.3m winner of the last several months of jeopardy.) I gotta say, Ken has taken the fun out of Jeopardy.

    1. Re:I wonder if he is in anyway related... by Fr05t · · Score: 1

      I fail to see where the letters f,u,n ever were in the name Jeopardy. I don't think it was called Jeofunpardy before Ken started to play.

    2. Re:I wonder if he is in anyway related... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were both the result of the same secret genetic testing carried out in Utah in the late 40's and early '50s.

      There are a disproportianately high number of exceptionally bright people in north-western Utah. Not all of them are so lucky to be blessed with full health though.

      Just like the Tuskegee Syphilis Study where Blacks were the target, the Utah study used Mormons -- a pretty easy target for Pentagon types back in the '40s and '50s.

      And let's not forget all the mind control and LSD experiments carried out on unsuspecting Canadians at the Penfield Center in Montreal.

      God Bless Ken Jennings, a happy outcome of directed evolution! :-)

  13. Oh, come on, NASA by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1

    They really just want to play home version Jeopardy with him - they think they can win. As proof, notice that they didn't ask to study Ken Jennings!

    There, I've run rings round you logically.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
  14. Accelerated learning techniques by AeiwiMaster · · Score: 1

    Hi

    I have a eigenpoll for books on accelerated learning techniques,
    in case there is anybody else which likes to get smarter as they get older ;-)

  15. Re:NASA? strange brain things? by zenmojodaddy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dumper than average?

    Dump chimp?

    You fail English? That's unpossible!

  16. They're both Mormon by sssmashy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As an interesting side note, both Ken Jenning and Kim Peek are Mormon. In fact, Mormon doctrine is one of the subjects that Kim has mastered in mind-dumbing detail.

    1. Re:They're both Mormon by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 5, Funny

      As another interesting side note, Ken Jennings answered a question (or is that questioned an answer) about Rain Man just a few shows ago... After answering he said "definitely, definitely."

    2. Re:They're both Mormon by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      As an interesting side note, both Ken Jenning and Kim Peek are Mormon. In fact, Mormon doctrine is one of the subjects that Kim has mastered in mind-dumbing detail.

      That's a scary thought in and of itself- but it only requires three books out of the 8000 he has read...I wonder if he'd turn Catholic after being let loose in the Vatican Library and consuming another 15,000 volumes of information on natural law, philosophy, and general theology?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:They're both Mormon by relaxrelax · · Score: 1


      I wonder if he can explain the masonic symbols on some Mormon underwear?

      --
      Microsoft is pure dog-ma. FreeBSD is pure cat-ma.
    4. Re:They're both Mormon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dum, Dum, Dum-Dum-Dum
      Dum-Dum Dum-Dum Dum!

    5. Re:They're both Mormon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bush totally cleaned Kerry's clock in Utah, better than in the South.

      In conclusion, Mormonism is worse than slavery.

  17. Shilling a look by blether · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's great living in the 21st century. Victorian evils such as freak shows have been abolished. We respect people's privacy. Oh, hang on... I guess his daddy's got to earn a dollar.

    1. Re:Shilling a look by joelethan · · Score: 1
      Mod parent up +1 funny, +3 insightful

      ...if only I had some mod points <sigh&gt

      /joelethan

  18. Heat Vision & Jack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The study has scientists hoping that technology used to study the effects of space travel on the brain will help explain his mental capabilities.

    Does he look anything like Jack Black, perchance?

  19. Pork by kippy · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Seriously, why is this being done by NASA? This is a neat thing happening with this guy but don't we have dozens of people who've actually been in space for extended periods of time? Why aren't CAT scans of them enough?

    I can't see how this has any practical relevance to the space program from the viewpoint of manned space (we have more than enough data on that front) or unmanned where this is completely unrelated.

    What ever happened to NASA being the Aeronautics and Space administration. Wasn't the VSE supposed to put the kibosh on all this science fair side issue stuff? Shouldn't this be relegated to some university psych program with a government grant?

    1. Re:Pork by strict3 · · Score: 1

      Because to fly super advanced Russian fighters you have to THINK in Russian.

      --
      "If a frog had side pockets, he'd carry a hand gun" - Dan Rather
    2. Re:Pork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      First we'll talk about what percentage of NASA's work goes directly into defense. Then we can attack their potentially constructive research.

    3. Re:Pork by kippy · · Score: 1

      Well, according to the budget, I'd say none of the money goes into defense. The DoD isn't hurting for money and isn't going to covertly drain a couple billion from NASA to supliment it's already $400+ billion budget.

      NASA is a civilian department. I think you need to adjust your tin-foil hat.

    4. Re:Pork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      NASA is doing it because they want to find out why all the chimps they sent into space came back super-intelligent.

    5. Re:Pork by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      If anything, NASA will GET funding from the DoD.

    6. Re:Pork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know how the Federal Govt works do you? It's not uncommon for the DoD (or any cabinent level dept) to pay another agency to do some research/build something for them if it is a specialty of theirs. Why re-invent the wheel if another agency already does a good job? I used to work for the USGS and we had several projects funded by the DoD, NASA, State Dept, various intelligence agencies, etc.

    7. Re:Pork by kippy · · Score: 1

      Ok then. What part of NASA does the black-ops military stuff? How much money do they get for it and from whom? Perhaps you're getting confused with the fact that the airforce was helping out NASA with Atlas rockets in the early days but that's the other way around.

      There was one case I heard of where a shuttle mission went on a secret military mission but that's about it.

      Do you have any sources to back up these claims or just boogieman stuff? NASA and the US geologic survey are different agencies.

    8. Re:Pork by sexylicious · · Score: 1

      NASA's "secret military missions" were almost exclusively launching/retrieving spy satellites. You can't put every spy satellite onto a Delta-III. ;)

      As for the "black-ops military stuff", NASA has no funding for that. When there is a potential military use for something (X43, for example), then the Air Force usually steps in and says something like, "Hey, we'll help fund this if we can look at the data and possibly experiment with ways to weaponize the idea." And since NASA is so starved for cash, they'll usually say yes. It's been that way since the beginning of NASA.

      There are two reasons for this:

      1) NASA's budget is strictly separated from DoD's by law and Congress holds the purse strings.

      2) NASA has MANY employees that are not cleared for DoD stuff. That means if you want the black ops stuff, you have to look at the DoD. NASA might take a look at analyzing something, but they won't know that that something is a DoD project. Most black ops stuff requires a clearance level above anything that anyone at NASA could ever need. Except when it comes to ideas that could be militarized; in those cases, the top people have to have the right DoD clearance since they have to know how the entire system works, not just one bolt or transistor.

  20. i find it most amazing by hsmith · · Score: 1

    how he can remember all these things but cannot remember simple things like the silverware drawer.

    maybe his brain catagorizes things as important/not important? truely interesting, maybe he has one of the secrets we need to further our learning abilties.

    but would i trade the ability to do common day tasks for :unlimited knowledge:, no. :-\

    1. Re:i find it most amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that savants are unencumbered with a normal persons propensity to categorize everything they see. Maybe theyre seeing the world in a very limited way that prevents them from being able to keep up with other people with regards to general survival in society, but excel in tasks which normal people find hard due to all the informational clutter that we attach to doing them. An extreme example is that a savant may not see a puzzle as a final picture but rather as a group of shapes that fit together. People who are good artists seem to be a little like this to me also. Rather than sitting down and drawing a "hand" (and most people fail at this since they already have ideas of what a whole hand is supposed to look like) they draw a collection of shapes that amounts to a hand.

    2. Re:i find it most amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny thing is that it is a trait of most absolute Geniuses.

      Albert Einstin regularly forgot where he lived.

    3. Re:i find it most amazing by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Albert Einstin regularly forgot where he lived.

      Doesn't matter where you live, it's all relative anyhow

  21. Hmmm by o0O+Dooby+O0o · · Score: 3, Funny

    So... where is this guy? I want to take him to the casinos. Two for good, one for bad. :)

    1. Re:Hmmm by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Casinos in any town which has more than one consecutive casino on any given street are damned easy to beat- just remember that the key for any casino is to draw in as many people as possible, and for people walking by on the sidewalk, winners behind glass=new customers who probably will sit further back than the first row of tables/machines.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  22. Yeah, by robpoe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Definately a waste of money. Big waste. yeah.

    --
    = Grow a brain...
  23. Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by hkb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    According to the following link, Kim Peek is not autistic, he's just a savant:

    http://www.wisconsinmedicalsociety.org/savant/ki mp eek.cfm


    Along the way to its completion, the original script for the movie Rain Man underwent a number of modifications. While Kim Peek served as the initial inspiration for the story, Raymond Babbitt, as portrayed so admirably by Dustin Hoffman, is a composite savant with abilities drawn from a number of different real life individuals. The main character in that movie, Raymond Babbitt, was modified to be an autistic savant. The story thus is that of a person who is autistic but also has savant skills grafted on to that basic autistic disorder. It is important to remember, therefore, that not all autistic persons are savants, and not all savants are autistic. In preparation for his role, Dustin Hoffman spent time with several other autistic savants and their families, as well as with Kim.

    Fran Peek describes his son this way: "Kim is not behaviorally autistic. He has a warm, loving personality. He truly cares for people and enjoys sharing his unique skills and knowledge capacity.


    It is important to distringuish that Kim Peek does not demonstrate the disassociation portrayed in the Rain Man movie.

    In fact, Kim Peek (along with his dad, Fran) spends a lot of time doing "charity work" with elderly people.

    Supposedly, he's quite a nice guy to talk to, if a bit mentally retarded (or whatever the proper term is these days).

    --
    /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
    1. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by ifwm · · Score: 1, Redundant

      "mentally retarded (or whatever the proper term is these days)"

      Mentally retarded is still the term. It's a clinical term, just like emphysema or congestive heart failure. The attempts to attach a negative connotation have only worked with non-professionals, and are really pointless anyway.

    2. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by benhocking · · Score: 1
      Fran Peek describes his son this way: "Kim is not behaviorally autistic. He has a warm, loving personality. He truly cares for people and enjoys sharing his unique skills and knowledge capacity.

      I know several autistic children, and they all have warm, loving personalities, once you get to know them. By all, I mean the ones I know - I will not argue that there may be autistic children/adults who do not have warm, loving personalities, but I'd be hard-pressed to believe they represent any majority. These are not cold people, they just have a hard time understanding others.

      NB: this is in response to the original comment, not the parent poster. I just get a little tired of some of the myths spread about autistic individuals, and although Fran did not explicitly state that autistic children are cold, one could infer that from her statement. Of course, Fran can't be blamed too much, since she didn't have an autistic child, most of her information likely came from popular beliefs.

      --
      Ben Hocking
      Need a professional organizer?
    3. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by stratjakt · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Mentally retarded is still used by doctors, but social workers and other PC professions consider it offensive and now use developmentally delayed.

      PC language is funny. As a kid, I was a patient at the Ontario Crippled Childrens Center. Until the PC lobby decided that the word Crippled was offensive, and it became the Hugh MacMillan Medical Center. But all the patients there were crippled, it's a center for prosthetics, orthotics, mental handicaps, etc.

      I like the racial PC stuff. Negro was once the proper term, it's spanish for black. Then people decided it was offensive. Then Black or Colored was the term, then it was decided it was offensive. Now its "African American".

      Back in canada, I had a friend born in Canada, with parents with a Jamaican background. He insisted that he be called African American, no matter how many times I would point out that he'd never even been to Africa or America.

      I'm sure "African American" will soon be deemed offensive, all it takes is for some people to use the term negatively. Then the PC folks will invent something else.

      It's all just words to me, what matters is the context.

      "You're looking for Fred? He's the black guy over there." is considered offensive by PC folk.

      "African Americans are all drug addicts and thieves and rapists, and are stupider than caucaisians!" is perfectly OK by PC doctrine.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by hkb · · Score: 1

      Are they really "developmentally delayed" when they don't really have the potential to develop beyond a certain threshold? Delayed seems like the wrong term here.

      --
      /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
    5. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by blether · · Score: 1

      I would point out that he'd never even been to Africa or America

      Canada is in America. Everyone from Chile upwards is American.

    6. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by Skeezix · · Score: 2, Informative

      Definitely. I was fortunate to have the opportunity to meet him at one point and he was an extremely friendly guy, until people ask him to do a "trick" like calculate the day of the week their birthdate fell on or do some math. Then he seemed to get annoyed, understandably.

    7. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by blether · · Score: 1

      Oops. I meant everyone from Chile northwards. Displaying my northern bias there!

    8. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, its a warm fuzzy term that lets social workers feel better about themselves. "No, his development is just delayed" which implies that eventually they will "catch up".

      It's even used for degenerative diseases where they know the condition will only worsen.

      PC language is all about making the speaker feel better about themselves, it has nothing to do with the audience. Like my "african american" sample.

      You could have the midnset of the grand wizard of the KKK but so long as you use terms like "african american" instead of "black", or "asian" instead of "oriental", you can happily convince yourself that you arent racist or ignorant.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    9. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by karnal · · Score: 1

      "Kim is not behaviorally autistic. He has a warm, loving personality. He truly cares for people and enjoys sharing his unique skills and knowledge capacity.

      Actually, I read that as he has a warm, loving personality - as compared to the entire human race.

      It's my firm belief that someone who hasn't been stepped on repeatedly by other people (or has perceived themselves stepped all over) is typically has a warm and loving personality.

      --
      Karnal
    10. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by SnapShot · · Score: 1

      Here's a new one. Apparently right-wing nut-jobs don't want to be called "religous right" or "christian right" anymore, now the preferred term is "christian conservative". I don't know about the consensus on "right-wing nut-jobs".

      --
      Waltz, nymph, for quick jigs vex Bud.
    11. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by jebell · · Score: 1
      I like the racial PC stuff. Negro was once the proper term, it's spanish for black. Then people decided it was offensive. Then Black or Colored was the term, then it was decided it was offensive. Now its "African American".

      I like to tell people that Charlize Theron is the most attractive African-American I have ever seen (I know she's from South Africa but I have no idea if she has ever become an American citizen). That's almost as funny as this story.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    12. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by SnapShot · · Score: 1

      I just found the link to the article on Slate.

      --
      Waltz, nymph, for quick jigs vex Bud.
    13. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fran is a he, not a she. Just like his son Kim.

    14. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mentally retarded is still the term. Actually the preferred term is "slashdotter"

    15. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by freqres · · Score: 1

      Yeah and it's 'liberals' or 'progressives' nowadays, no more spouting off about 'commie pinko fags'.

      --
      Rampant Ninja related crimes these days...Whitehouse is not the exception
    16. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by benhocking · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you are correct in your interpretation of what he (Fran) was saying. I think you're spot on with respect to your belief about people who either aren't stepped on or, as is much more likely to be the case, aren't aware they're being stepped on typically having a warm and loving personality.

      --
      Ben Hocking
      Need a professional organizer?
    17. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by benhocking · · Score: 1

      And just like me, Ashlie (my first name). I should know better than to assume the sex of someone by their name, especially when it was clear from context that Fran is male. Thanks for the correction.

      --
      Ben Hocking
      Need a professional organizer?
    18. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure "African American" will soon be deemed offensive, all it takes is for some people to use the term negatively. Then the PC folks will invent something else.

      How about "Complexionally challenged"?

    19. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by paganizer · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty happy with "right-wing nut-job", personally.
      Of course, I'm pagan instead of christian, believe in a womans right to choose, etc. but I'm adamantly pro-gun so my liberal friends know what my TRUE nature is.
      And no, I didn't vote for bush. I wrote in Ron Paul.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    20. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by nojomofo · · Score: 1

      Ob. Simpsons:

      Lisa: You know, in a way, all Americans are immigrants. Except, of course Native Americans.
      Homer: Yeah, Native Americans like us.
      Lisa: No, I mean American Indians.
      Apu: Like me.

    21. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's alright, sweetheart, are you repressing those urges again? Don't worry, just because you want to experiment doesn't mean that you are gay.

    22. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is worth noting that the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), is used to clinically define one as having autism (as opposed to the non-clinical term "autism spectrum dissorder" or the clinical catch all term "Pervasive Developmental Disporder-Not Otherwise Specified"). In order to have clinical autism DSM-IV requires...

      1. Qualitative impairment in social interaction, manifest by at least two of the following:

      A. Marked impairment in the use of multiple nonverbal behaviors, such as eye-to-eye gaze, facial expression, body postures and gestures, to regulate social interaction

      B. Failure to develop peer relationships appropriate to developmental level

      C. Lack of spontaneous seeking to share enjoyment, interests, or achievements with other people (e.g., by lack of showing, bringing, or pointing out objects of interest)

      D. Lack of social or emotional reciprocity

      C&D can often be seen by others as being cold or not loving. However, one could technically be autistic by exhibiting A&B while seeking to share enjoyment and having emotional reciprocity.

    23. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I know several autistic children, and they all have warm, loving personalities, once you get to know them.

      And the ones I've gotten to know are autistic. They don't have warm personalities. They prefer to not be in the company of other people. They prefer solitude and coldness to friendship. They have short times when they are friendly, but most of the time they act like people are an annoyance that must be tolerated. Perhaps they had a warm loving personality that was completely obscured by a disorder, but they did not act warm or loving, not to me, not to their parents, and not to their siblings.

    24. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mentally retarded is still the term.

      Actually the preferred term is "slashdotter"


      Oh, I am? Well, you and I are some truly sad people then.

    25. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by benhocking · · Score: 1

      You bring up a good point. The child I am most familiar with and have spent the most time with, definitely has characteristics A & B. (This child is also clearly autistic, as opposed to having Asperger's Syndrome or other autistic spectrum disorders.) However, a clinician who doesn't know the child (and perhaps more importantly isn't known by the child) would probably suggest that the child manifests C&D as well. Of course, I guess good clinicians weigh information gleaned from parents and others who do know (and are known) by the child (IANAPsychologist/Psychiatrist).

      Additionally, this child and the other autistic children I know are all in an ABA (applied behavioral analysis) program that is designed to mediate their symptoms, so that could explain why my experiences with these children differ from other people's experiences.

      Examples of this child's warm, loving personality are:

      • his genuine excitement in seeing me when I come to visit
      • his requests to spend time with his favorite people (e.g., his grandparents)
      • his gentleness to his younger sister
      • etc.
      --
      Ben Hocking
      Need a professional organizer?
    26. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by goodydot · · Score: 1

      I've been working for years on being an idiot savant...I'm half-way there!

    27. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange, I am autistic. I don't talk much (I use a Lightwriter to do what most people do with their natural voice). I met the criteria for Infantile Autism (AKA DSM III version of "classic autism") and was diagnosed with that label when I was 5. So I know a little bit about autism. And it is also rather difficult to dismiss me as "high functioning" when life is a bit more complicated then that. I also know at least 50 other autistic people, ranging in age from very young to very old, and would be classified very low to very high functioning by people who believe functioning level exists only on one axis.

      Some are *VERY* friendly. I have an autistic friend who is probably the most outgoing person I've ever met, yet she is very clearly autistic. Not only her doctors agree with this, but also several leading autism researchers at several different universities where she participated as a subject.

      There are autistics who aren't warm. But saying there are no warm autistics is a statement that is made from ignorance (I'm not saying the poster I'm replying to said that there are no autistics that have warm personalities, but I suspect some here may be thinking it). Saying all are warm is equally ignorant. The variations that exist in the normal population in this area exist among us too, sometimes we just show them a bit more strongly than most.

      When did you see this children? After school? When visiting? In otherwords, when they were stressed (new situations *do* stress autistics, as do new people). Are you warm and caring when you are tired and groggy? How about when you have a bad day at work/school? Autistics are not superhuman and these things certainly affect us - just "these things" happen to be things like "new people around me" and "florescent lights" rather then "boss yelled at me."

      I'd also add that people don't read our body language and non-verbals properly. I remember many times where I was desperately wanting to meet people at some event but was unable to do so because I was giving off the "I don't want to be bothered" signal which was not my intent at all. It's just that I speak a different non-verbal language than most people.

    28. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      But saying there are no warm autistics is a statement that is made from ignorance (I'm not saying the poster I'm replying to said that there are no autistics that have warm personalities, but I suspect some here may be thinking it). Saying all are warm is equally ignorant.

      That was my point. It wasn't that I thought they were all not warm. It was that he may have had "many" autisitc acquaintences that were warm, and my experience was the opposite.

      One was a person I saw nearly every day for 3 months. We were at work. I'm sure some people have good days and some have bad days. His demeanor was never "warm." When he was having a bad day, he'd tell the customers to fuck off, or soemthing equally as appropriate. When he was having a good day, he'd answer questions, but not volunteer any information, unless he directly associated it with the question. Such as when he was going on vacation, he wouldn't talk about where and when and all that. But one time, he did volunteer, when asked what he was going to do, that "It's going to be a fucking long week, fucking long." And he said it in a manner that made it obvious that he was repeating what his father told him.

      The other autistic people I've been around have been in a more limited exposure. But they also haven't been warm. I don't assert that it is the way with all autistic people, but I gave this as a point of view to counter the one of the person that said he's only encountered warm autistic people.

    29. Re:Kim Peek not autistic, just a savant by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "Mentally retarded is still used by doctors, but social workers and other PC professions consider"

      No we don't. As exactly the type of professional you describe, I can assure you that we still use Mentally retarded.

  24. 15 different or the same subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds like he is good at memorizing lists of stuff. Is he really good at 15 different subjects?

  25. Re:I Get All My Boxers at K-Mart by nearlygod · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That is a great station and it still broadcasts online: http://www.woxy.com/

    --
    The Tools Of Ignorance wanna be a tool?
  26. I nominate myself to run all the experiments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...featuring Valeria Golino.

  27. At the risk of sounding.... by ninji · · Score: 0

    I don't mean to sound how I probably do, but I've found (and while I dont mean on the level of intellectual knoweldge bareance as Kim) that most people have close to an endless amount of memory, and if people spend their time Learning and absorbing information, they tend to retain most of it... I know intelligence is a factor, but persay in this country, we are raised to think of education, work, and learning as a burden, and hence we don't like it... When I was in school, I failed classes, didn't do test's or homework, slept through classes etc... Now I love learning so much I can't find the will to do anything with my life BUT work or study 24 hours a day... When I thought with the mindset i was raised with here, that learning was burden, I hated it and didnt retain near 30% of the infromation I processed... Now that I enjoy learning, I tend to bare memory of closer to 80% of what I learn, and at other times in my life I would of thought it impossible to know as much information as I do now... And of course, im not saying I am any more intellegent or am more adept to learning then anyone else, especially here on /. where almost anyone is my intellectual peer, but my point is meerly someones will to learn, or more of lack of will to limit themsleves, is highly responsible for how much a person knows.... And yes, of course, this person is impressivly and extremely knowledgeable in a wide array of topics, more then the average person can ever expect to be, my point being though that I consider it easily humanly possible for me or anyone reading this to posses the same knowledge... Im sure most of you are as geeky and me, and like learning as much as me, if you were able to spend all your time studying eg full time student, and studied every topic this man is knowledgeable in, I think it enitrely possible for humanity itself to reach that level of 'genius'... I blame the stunt of humanitys growth(or atleast, partially this countries) on how we are mentally raised... We are raised being told you will go school and hate it, then go to work and hate it. Almost anyone I know raised in America has this mindstate, and becuase of it, their idea of a productive night involves doing nothing but sittin on a couch... Where as my japanese friends, even my younger ones, are fierce when it comes to educational and work concepts, they are FAR FAR more diciplined, and they were raised with a 'learn to succeed, its good and you NEED TO, you almost have no choice but to learn as much as you can' mindstate, and becuase of it, their lives much more reflect a productive and educational lifestyle.... As this post is starting to wander FAR off topic and ill probably get negatively modded for it, ill wrap it up and try to bring it back to the original content... Yes, this person does have genius-level learning and knowledge posession, but imo, alot more of earth is capable of it if they didnt waste so much time :D (and yes I know people dedicate their lives to this and don't acheive, but my point is if society, espcially american society, produced differnt veiws to people, they would be far more willed to educate themsleves further then the 'minimum' ; eg most people get degrees just to get a job, not to learn what they are being taught, becuase yet again, here thats the mindset we are raised with, not to go to shcool to learn, but to have a peice of paper that says you can work somenwhere'...) I supposed my thinking is biased and flawed, but still, If humans didnt waste so much time, I think all of humanity would be genius by now ;P

    1. Re:At the risk of sounding.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is either "persay" or "per say" the correct American English spelling of the British English, formerly Latin, "per se", or is slashdot full of idiots?

    2. Re:At the risk of sounding.... by spitefowl · · Score: 1, Informative

      At the risk of sounding like a troll.. Try reading up on paragraphs!

    3. Re:At the risk of sounding.... by Feynman · · Score: 1

      I probably would have gotten something out of your posting but the way you wrote it, running on and on with no paragraphs run-on sentences no capitalization and lots of elipses...and so forth...I couldn't follow it and it's really hard to learn stuff when you have to read and read and read and what a burden to learn it's just easier to ask people to help you and to do the minimum to get by and eat and watch a lot of TV and...

    4. Re:At the risk of sounding.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got a headache after reading about half of what you said but I think you're being too general. Everyone learns differently and everyone has different capacities and skills.

      I seriously doubt you could compete with Kim Peek in any of his skills even when he was 10 years old. Just like I doubt you could compete with Schumacher in racing a car. There is no amount of learning or practice that would allow you to beat either one, ever.

      Different skills and talents. Some people are literally just better at certain things. Pretty much anyone can learn to be very good at anything but no one can learn to be the best at everything.

    5. Re:At the risk of sounding.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Is either "persay" or "per say" the correct American English spelling of the British English, formerly Latin, "per se", or is slashdot full of idiots?

      Yes - its full of Americans.

    6. Re:At the risk of sounding.... by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      Seriously. It's not worth the effort to try to read that.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    7. Re:At the risk of sounding.... by wcrowe · · Score: 1

      That's great. Perhaps you should try learning some English next.

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    8. Re:At the risk of sounding.... by Blitzenn · · Score: 1

      Why do people completely discount other people's point of view strictly on the basis of grammer or spelling. It is the same as judging someone based on their race, no difference, (Maybe we should gas all of the people how can't spell well on the fly or don't know what a BR tag is.)

      Get over it.

    9. Re:At the risk of sounding.... by chyllaxyn · · Score: 0

      ..think you've become a bit wordy too. .)

    10. Re:At the risk of sounding.... by ninji · · Score: 1

      The point was to be general, that any person has higher intellectual capablities then they focus on developing. I would like you to point out where I said I can compete with any of his skills, becuase I didn't. "There is no amount of learning or practice that would allow you to beat either one, ever." Is a ridiculious statement, as if your such a limited mind to think that nobody on earth who studies math for their whole life could EVER compete in math against kim, then thats your problem. Skils and talents are differnt, people are better at differnt things, my point IS you yourself would probably be alot more intelligent if you didn't spend so much idle time. And again, I don't know how much time you might or might not waste, But the average person my age spends more then half of every day literally doing NOTHING. If that time was spent studying you can be ASSURED that the average level of intelligence amoung them would be higher..,. My point wasn't that anyone can be Kim Peek, or better then, but that they can be alot more then they are. And that becuase of his autism, he is more focused in those areas then other people.

    11. Re:At the risk of sounding.... by ninji · · Score: 1

      TO ALL READING THIS POST, I USED PARAGAPHS AND LINE BREAKS, and /. Is formatting most posts to remove them, Do i have to include HTML or some other tag to make it work? I put the paragaphs and linebreaks in when typing it, and in the textbox looked correctly, but no matter what I do when I click submit it goes back to lineless and paragraphless fromatting...

    12. Re:At the risk of sounding.... by ninji · · Score: 1

      I now just noticed the HTML formmated option and realized I had it on instead of Plain text, being the cause of thus...

    13. Re:At the risk of sounding.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is a ridiculious statement, as if your such a limited mind to think that nobody on earth who studies math for their whole life could EVER compete in math against kim, then thats your problem.

      Ugh, please try to read what I wrote. I guess I was expecting too much considering your poor writing skills. Anyway, to reiterate, I specifically said you could not compete with them.

      Just anyone can't sit down and stuff their brain. That's just not true. Some people can, some can't. You implied that anyone can do anything if they just apply some effort. What I said was that they can get better but there are limits and the limits depend on the person.

    14. Re:At the risk of sounding.... by ninji · · Score: 1

      I Implied that People can learn MORE then they do, if they applied more effort, not that they can ALL obtain equal status.

      Even if your reffering to just me, it's still closed minded of you to think that I couldnt excel in one single topic in comparisson to a 10 year old kim.

      EVERYONE is capable of learning to some extent, and I didnt imply to 'stuff their brain' with something beyond their limit. I didn't IMPLY anyone can do anything if they just have some effort. I directly said anyone has a chance to be more then they are, YOU took the initaitive to perceive that as 'Anyone can do anything if they try'.

      Of course there are limits to how much each person can learn, and of course they are differnt from person to person, but if you insist that the common person isnt capable of learning more if they tried harder, again, thats your closed mindedness.

    15. Re:At the risk of sounding.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      trust me, ju not beter than kim

    16. Re:At the risk of sounding.... by Wescotte · · Score: 1

      But the average person my age spends more then half of every day literally doing NOTHING. If that time was spent studying you can be ASSURED that the average level of intelligence amoung them would be higher..,.

      There isn't "NOOP" for the brain.. Just becaue somebody isn't learning something you consider useful doesn't mean they're not learning something.

      However I do agree most people tend to spend alot of time on things I consider useless.

    17. Re:At the risk of sounding.... by ninji · · Score: 1

      That's what I mean, It could be just me, but the average person I know dosen't work or study outside of when they ABSOLUTELY have to.

      The average middle aged person I know, dosen't intake any new knoweldge other then daily news, and they work as much as they have to, get home, and spend the rest of the time watching tv and just vegging.

      The average person I know from 15-28, either works a average job or goes to school, although looks at them both as burdens, and dosen't make any attempt to work or learn outside of those.

      And yes, it is understandbale that not everyone wants to 'constantly' be engaged in these activites, but thats not my point, its that most people avoid them whenever possible when they are the most bennificial things in exsistance (imo).

      Im not trying to critize peoples lifestyles, they work, and they go to school, and they are welcome to spend their time doing whatever else they want.
      My point, is more about the general idealism's in america about education in work, how we are raised to see them as ONLY tasks and burdens... Im sure it is to different extents depending on how your rasied, but myself and general everyone ive met was raised with that mindset...

  28. Re:But can he beat Ken Jennings by Ayaress · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Probably not. Jennings has made it as far as he has because he knows a little bit about seemingly everything, whereas Peek effectively knows everything about a narrow set of fifteen subjects. Jeopardy covers a wide set of subjects in each game (sixteen categories per show, usually one or two of which is a sort of grab bag where all the answers have an O in them or something, but cover completely unrelated topics), with relatively little repeat subjects from show to show. Somebody with a lot of knowledge about a few subjects can win one or two shows if the topics go their way, but they'll lose in the long run because the topics change dramatically.

  29. Mr. President, we must not allow a savant gap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I think it would be extremely naive of us, Mr. President, to imagine that these new developments are going to cause any change in Chinese savant-expansionist policy. I mean, we must be... increasingly on the alert to prevent them from taking over other savant technology, in order to create savants more prodigiously than we do, thus, knocking us out with superior savants!

    Mr. President, we must not allow... a mega-savant gap!"

    Free Flat Screens | Free iPod Photo | It really works!

  30. so, where's the beef by ch-chuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ok, what does the mri show about his brain that's different than Mr. Normal Person? Are there different neuron interconnections, higher density, what? Any clue as to how his memory works?

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:so, where's the beef by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Turns out most of the intelligence originates from proteins stored in the penis. That is why men with large penises are so much smarter than other men.

    2. Re:so, where's the beef by ebuck · · Score: 1

      Well, there's been limited success study of the nitty-gritty details of memory and how it functions. Hopefully by observing Kim, some more information on memory (and more imporantly processing ability) can be found.

      My favorite memory study deals with cannabilistic flatworms. They could teach naieve flatworms by feeding them pieces of educated flatworms. This behavior was observed in the 1960's by James V McConnell. It's so incredible that you should read his study, fortunately, it was completely repeatable.

  31. Re:NASA should keep the study "top secret". by MindStalker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know I shouldn't respond to this troll. But I personally know many chinese, and can tell you they are not morally bankrupt.
    Upon questioning them about Tibet, it is obviously apparant that their government has severily altered the truth. Basically the offical line is that the Tibetians (spelling?) are poor and need Chinas help. Tibet is basically viewed as a welfare state by the rest of China. Many Chinese only want Tibet to be part of their country because they feel compasion and want to help them.

    Sadly I could not convense the chinese I talked to that Tibet was anything different, as they assumed that different views were lies by the Western Media. Oh well. Now the Chinese Government being morally corrupt, I could definatly agree. But, I would not be so quick to assume that the civilians are such.

  32. not just your run of the mill savants... but a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MEGA-SAVANT

  33. Geography vs. Spoon location by cmstremi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Interesting that he can describe driving directions and specific geography but can't apply the same skills to locating the silverware - they seem like very similar tasks.

    1. Re:Geography vs. Spoon location by budgenator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      both tasks probably are similar when you can do both and are probably very different for Kim who can't. I find I can find things easily when I put them in a physical location, but when my wife moves them and merely tells me where they are I'm unlikly to remember the new location. My guess is if his parents wrote a book "where things are" and always put things in their place, Kim would be excellent at telling you where they were kept even down to detailed directions to get them, yet would still be unable to get them himself.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    2. Re:Geography vs. Spoon location by Blitzenn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Should this surprise anyone? I think not, and yet it seems to. I find that to be most distressing. We can apply rules to how one persons brain functions and how associations work differently for that person. Yet we cannot seem to bring ourselves to apply the same simply rules to our own students in school. Everyones brain does not work the same. Different people remember things based on different methods of association. What works for some, does not work for others. Yet if one student can't 'get it', we send them to the office for being 'bad'. Some people need multiple points of association to remember one thing, some need one point to rememeber many things. The later is typically an 'autistic' trait because the knowledge is locked behind a string of associations that can appear as not having anything to do with each other. Yet as in the case of Kim Peek, he has a whole different method for recalling these associations based on a completely different method of retrieval. Shame on our educators for STILL trying to force people into boxes after we have supposedly already 'learned' these lessons from people such as mozart and einstein.

  34. Re:NASA should keep the study "top secret". by bpd1069 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I find it increasingly distrubing that the level of racist remarks on /. has increased of late.

    I realize that not everyone has the capacity for expressing their xenophobic tendencies in hopes to confront and thereby conquering them. But there are some who feel this is funny/mind-fsck'n, and is 'ok' for them. /. does have a history of really mind-numbing trolls, but this is just overt racism, and in no way acceptable.

    --
    --
  35. Clarification by Snaller · · Score: 4, Funny

    Kim Peek - an autistic man who has been deemed a "mega-savant" for his astonishing knowledge of 15 grand subjects ranging from history and literature, geography and numbers, to sports, music and dates

    That's dates as in "When was Christopher Columbus born" not "Take me in your strong arms and make passionate love to me"?

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:Clarification by Darthmalt · · Score: 1

      mod parent as -1 redundant.

      c'mon this is slashdot we only have only ever known or experienced one type of date.

    2. Re:Clarification by SFBwian · · Score: 1
      c'mon this is slashdot we only have only ever known or experienced one type of date.

      The fruit?

      --
      I'm looking to get rich. I've got steps #2 (????) and #3 (PROFIT!) planned out, but am having trouble coming up with #1.
  36. Now if NASA had some spice... by st964p62 · · Score: 0

    they could mutate him into a Guild Steersman and fold space. He who controls the spice, controls the universe. ;)

  37. Can't find the spoon drawer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats because there is no spoon drawer!

  38. Re:NASA? strange brain things? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAHAHAH, bugger. Most of my attempts at humor fail in this way. I'm so dumb I can't spell dumb correctly. I think I'll go and look for a job digging ditches now..

  39. Preliminary Findings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NASA's findings to date:
    1. K-Mart Sucks

  40. Put him at the helm of the next shutlle launch by I'm+Spartacus! · · Score: 2, Funny

    After all he is an excellent driver!

    --
    "War is God's way of teaching Americans geography." -- Ambrose Bierce
  41. Peek Performance by base_chakra · · Score: 1

    Personally I'd be curious to look at the difference in his brain activity when he is dealing with one of his specialities as opposed to when he is trying to find a spoon.

    Well, the CNN article is characteristically light on details, but it says the tests will include MRI and "computerized tomography" (i.e., a PET scan). The PET scan can be used for examining things like flow of blood and oxygen, as well as which parts of the brain are utilized for a given task. Unfortunately, even though PET research can focus on a specific "task", it can't really be used for monitoring tasks that last very long.

    I think I would actually be more interested in EEG test results. One can monitor EEG during longer tasks, but I'm especially interested in what kind of "zone" Peek is in when he's consuming information. Certain states of consciousness or "arousal levels" are conducive to super-learning, but are ill-suited to other tasks.

    Btw, if you're interested in what Peek looks like, check this page from CSU Fresno's University Journal.

  42. In other important news... by mmThe1 · · Score: 0

    I've started posting comments on slashdot news articles in 16 different areas - Apache, Apple, AskSlashdot, Books....

    and I've also started having trouble counting things, and remembering what I just typed.
    and I've also started having trouble counting things, and remembering what I just typed.

  43. Well no wonder then by wombatmobile · · Score: 2, Insightful

    .

    Kim was born with "an enlarged head and missing corpus callosum, the connecting tissue between the brain hemispheres, damage to the cerebellum and no anterior commissure"?

    No wonder he can't find the silverware drawer at home. That requires coordination of the parietal lobe via the corpus callosum.

    No wonder he can't dress himself, that requires a cerebellum for detailed motor movements.

    Now what can he do, this modern day human with a massive conjoined cortical apparatus?

    1. Re:Well no wonder then by GeckoX · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe beat Ken Jennings?

      --
      No Comment.
    2. Re:Well no wonder then by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Run Linux on him?

      Or the more serious answer..

      I think Kim is already doing more than a lot of us combined manage to do.
      He is showing people that its not wrong to be different :)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:Well no wonder then by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      People who are born with serious brain deformities sometimes just magically start using other areas of their brain to do whatever we'd do in the broken parts.

      There's a case of a person who had a brain that was about a third normal size, and no one even realized it until he was 20 or so and got x-rayed for a head injury.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    4. Re:Well no wonder then by scottv67 · · Score: 0

      >There's a case of a person who had a brain that was about a third normal size, and no one even realized it until he was 20 or so and got x-rayed for a head injury.

      Yeah, that guy led a pretty normal life. He even went on to run as the Democratic candidate for President in the 2004 election.

      -s ;^)

  44. Put him on Jeopardy! by rubberbando · · Score: 1

    Kim Peek sounds like he is probably the only person that will be able to take down Ken Jennings before he breaks the bank.

    --
    DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
    1. Re:Put him on Jeopardy! by Blitzenn · · Score: 1

      Ken Jennings lost about a month ago. You are watching the TV airings of shows taped in the past. Trust me, he lost and went home, albiet very happy with the amount of cash he had in his pocket.

  45. That's a lot of subjects by BillsPetMonkey · · Score: 1

    Is that 15 grand ("thousand") subjects then? Well, that's much more than a monkey or a ton of subjects!

    --
    "It's not your information. It's information about you" - John Ford, Vice President, Equifax
    1. Re:That's a lot of subjects by goodydot · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our new GRANDMONKEYTON overlords!

  46. Oh... by sczimme · · Score: 1


    There, I've run rings round you logically.

    "Oh, intercourse the penguin!"

    Ya know, that came from a Monty Python sketch but it takes on a slightly different meaning here. Eeww.

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    1. Re:Oh... by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1

      >Oh, intercourse the penguin!" ...
      >Ya know, that came from a Monty Python sketch

      It probably came from the zoo.

      --
      sigs, as if you care.
  47. sigh... by Honclfibr · · Score: 1

    In soviet Russia, Russian thinks in YOU!

  48. Peek on tour by DevilPen · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Kim Peek and his father visited my college (Elizabethtown College) several years ago. It was basically the two of them on stage describing Kim's condition. That was followed up by some interesting personal stories from Kim's life... including their involvement in the "Rain Man" film experience.

    The most interesting part of the session was the question and answer portion at the end. For about 30 - 45 minutes Kim fielded various "trivia" questions from the audience. They ranged from obscure baseball facts from 50 years ago, to a student standing up, stating his name and hometown and asking for his address and phone number. No-one succeeded in stumping Peek.

    Peek's visit was certainly one of two most interesting speakers to visit my college while I was there. (the other would be Desmond Tutu)

    1. Re:Peek on tour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > to a student standing up, stating his name and hometown and asking for his address and phone number

      I don't get it. This sounds like mind reading

    2. Re:Peek on tour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called a phone book.

    3. Re:Peek on tour by saddino · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't get it. This sounds like mind reading

      If I recall, one of Peek's, er, "hobbies" is reading the White Pages and memorizing names and their associated addresses/phone numbers. I believe they touched upon this in "Rain Man" while in the hotel.

      So, my guess is that Peek probably reads the White Pages whenever he visits someplace. Not quite mind reading, but still amazing nonetheless.

    4. Re:Peek on tour by jgoemat · · Score: 1

      So he has memorized the phone book for every town in the US? Oh, and the student had his own name in his hometown phone book and not his parents' names? This just seems fishy to me. Maybe it's just not told very well...

    5. Re:Peek on tour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you even RTFA?

    6. Re:Peek on tour by f8free · · Score: 1

      I would've thought he memorized the student directory. They usually list hometown addresses for students.

  49. Re:NEWS FLASH: Man gets smarter as he gets older by Lovedumplingx · · Score: 1

    Because autistic children and people don't learn the way we do. Most autistic people are lucky if they can spell their name. A few happen to be autistic-savant as this person is, and his learning is incredible because it's not normal for an autistic person to be able to learn like that.

  50. Whats the story? by JollyFinn · · Score: 0, Troll

    A slashdotter gets a brain scan. And the scientist are looking how to understand the results...
    Nothing new here just go on...

    --
    Emacs is good operating system, but it has one flaw: Its text editor could be better.
  51. Conspiracy theory #27 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So that's why the psychohistory curve is going into a singularity. NASA using "space technology" to "study human brains?" You don't need a tin foil hat to see this doesn't make sense. What's probably happening is the Mul.. er, Kim Peek took over NASA and is getting them to convert their Star Wars lasers into mind control ray emit>!*(!#%!^&#@$ Hey, CSI Miami was pretty cool last night.

    1. Re:Conspiracy theory #27 by ebuck · · Score: 1

      Dude....

      NASA's the country's leading expert in PROBES....

      Makes perfect sense to me.

  52. Re:NASA should keep the study "top secret". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What makes racism a more important brand of thoughtcrime than any of the other forms of anti-socialness? This ain't 1940 any more.

  53. I am not a number by 790396 · · Score: 0

    Oh wait, yest I am

  54. MOD PARENT UP!!! by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    MOD PARENT UP!!! Very interesting post.
    Anyone have a link to research which shows elevated levels of heavy metals?

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by jd · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Ozzy Osbourne is said to be mildly autistic, does that count?


      Failing that, check autism.about.com for links to sites detailing therapies involving heavy metal detox. Autism Today also has some stuff on the subject.


      I see nothing from the "major" medical and psychiatric sites, though. Most of the stuff seems to be from "alternative" medical sites. Now, that doesn't make it incorrect - medical sites are notoriously slow at picking up new ideas. (The recommended practices for preventing the spread of SARS were largely the recommended practices from Florence Nightingale's medical text!)


      On the flip-side, it does mean that it's not necessarily clinically proven. For example, Oregon has some severely contaminated rivers, especially mercury contamination, but it's not known as a hot-spot for autism the way California is.


      I'd like to see some peer-reviewed research on this. (Particularly if there's anything that could mean I can quit the damn meds for Aspergers. That stuff's not cheap!) But I'm not risking what's left of my brain on unproven guesswork.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by Jareeedo · · Score: 1

      Did everyone just miss the reference to Ozzy Osbourne being mildly autistic and using heavy metal therapy?

    3. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Try this:
      http://tlredwood.home.mindspring.com/mercur ypoison .htm

      Part of the reason why California is a hot spot for autism is because of the large number of scientists and I.T. workers that have moved there. These fields are full of autistics, so they're far more likely to have children that are autistic than the general population, because of their genetic characteristics which make them susceptible.

      What do you mean meds for aspergers? If you mean antidepressants, try taking omega 3 supplements. Mercury toxicity trashes the body's ability to convert short to long chain omega 3. Look for fish oil omega 3 (already long chain) and make sure it's refined or from deep sea salmon, or else it'll be full of methylmercury. Chelated selenium is good for autistics too.

      If you're autistic, you're almost sure to be allergic to gluten+wheat and milk. The allergic reactions to these cause nutritional deficiencies that help lead to depression.

    4. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by teromajusa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you're autistic, you're almost sure to be allergic to gluten+wheat and milk.

      There are no studies showing this to be the case. All evidence about the effectiveness of gfcf diet are entirely anectodal. I'm sceptical because food alergies are often blamed for unexplained medical conditions. I think people like to attribute things to diet because its something they have some control over.

    5. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I'm still RTOFL.

    6. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oregon has some severely contaminated rivers, especially mercury contamination, but it's not known as a hot-spot for autism the way California is.

      On the other hand, Oregon doesn't have a problem with massive pot and LSD dumps leaching into the water supply since the 1960s...

    7. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by VeriTea · · Score: 1
      Only because it is a new treatment. A lot of autistic children have been helped significantly by removing dairy and gluten from their diets.

      There is a broad range of interaction between our bodies and food. You can have a problem with a food without it causing the classic "alergic" response. You see this in people with IBS all the time, some foods just send them over the edge, and not because of any specific digestion pattern. It seems like there can be "food sensitivities" that affect us.

      --
      --- There are two kinds of people, those who accept dogmas and know it, and those who accept dogmas and don't know it
    8. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by jd · · Score: 1

      You're referring to Washington DC, I take it. :)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    9. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by teromajusa · · Score: 1

      It may be only because it is new, or it may be that they never will find any positive effect.

      Since all we've got is anecdotal evidence, I can only go by what I've seen. I've known a number of families who've tried this treatement. They all pretty much felt like it might be helping but couldn't say for sure. My impression was that they really really wanted it to work.

  55. Hands of blue? by cying · · Score: 1

    You didn't happen to notice by any chance that he had blue hands, did you?

  56. Re:But can he beat Ken Jennings by Politburo · · Score: 1

    Ken's real mastery is the timing, not his knowledge. On most Jeopardy questions, all three contestants know the answer. It is simply a matter of who buzzes in first. On Jeopardy, you get penalized for buzzing in early: your buzzer will be locked out for a moment or two. Ken has mastered the timing and is able to buzz in at the perfect moment on almost every question. Check out his opponents. Some of them will get visibly pissed off at the buzzer.

    Ken does have a vast knowledge and in many cases is able to answer the $2000 questions when the other 2 contestants cannot, but he generally has the game wrapped up by the end of the Jeopardy Round due to his timing, imo.

  57. Decisions, decisions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since this guy is so smart, should we not let him make the final decision regarding the Hans Solo/Greedo debate? Kim? Oh, that's right, he probably can't use a typewriter, either.

  58. Why don't they... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why don't they put in in a room with ALL the available data on HIS condition (autism), let him make autism his latest subject to be a "mega-savant" about; then ASK HIM ABOUT HIS OWN CONDITION ?

    1. Re:Why don't they... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      memory capacity does not equate intelligence. that is why these folks are "savants" he can recall everything he reads, but he can't really extrapolate new data from it. that's the issue.

  59. Re:NASA should keep the study "top secret". by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    I doubt that this comment was meant to be racist but more a condemnation of the Chinese government. It often sounds like a condemnation of the people because in most democratic countries the people for the most part identify with themselves with there government. That parent statement should have read " the morally bankrupt Chinese government". My question is can the average Chinese person read slashdot?
    Maybe the new metric should be this. If your government will not let you read Slashdot it is moral bankrupt. If you read Slashdot you are morally bankrupt? Just kidding.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  60. Re:But can he beat Ken Jennings by FCAdcock · · Score: 1

    Dude, he's memorized 6,700 books. I don't think my local libary HAS that many books. I'd think that with all that knoledge he's got enough memorized to make a few bucks on jeopardy.

    --
    --Forest C. Adcock--
  61. Maybe he realizes a truth that you don't... by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 1

    namely, that there is no spoon.

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
  62. curious about pi by phil42 · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know to how many digits he knows pi. On tv I once saw a guy who was supposed to know pi to a million digits.

  63. Re:compare to Bush's brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're right of course; and off-topic, so I won't use my mod points to mod you up. Perhaps someone else with more karma to burn will.

  64. Re:NEWS FLASH: Man gets smarter as he gets older by Fr05t · · Score: 1

    I just assumed that since my parents get smarter as I get older, I must be getting dumber as I grow old.

  65. Re:NEWS FLASH: Man gets smarter as he gets older by corbettw · · Score: 1

    OK, can someone tell me why this is surprising?

    I probably couldn't 10 years ago. Now, I'm not so sure.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  66. Re:But can he beat Ken Jennings by Kartik3 · · Score: 1

    You're right....

    Only when someone starts to display incredible knowledge of potent potables will Mr. Jennings have to really worry. ;)

  67. Jeapordy grudge match... by acherrington · · Score: 3, Funny

    Kim Peek Versus Ken Jennings on Jepordy.... Wow that would be an episode to remember. Put that on prime time.

    --


    Victory is gained, not in knowing your opponents next move, but in preempting them.
    1. Re:Jeapordy grudge match... by SFBwian · · Score: 1

      Yes, but then Kim Peek would miss Jeopardy!

      --
      I'm looking to get rich. I've got steps #2 (????) and #3 (PROFIT!) planned out, but am having trouble coming up with #1.
    2. Re:Jeapordy grudge match... by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1, Funny

      Kim Peek Versus Ken Jennings on Jepordy

      And here's your host for Jeopardy... Joseph Smith.

  68. His IQ hasn't decreaced because... by ddkilzer · · Score: 1

    He's obviously not married with children.

    1. Re:His IQ hasn't decreaced because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'll bet he doesn't watch NASCAR either...

  69. That is fucking unbelievable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    MindStalker says that he has told many Chinese folks what the real situation in Tibet is. Despite knowing the facts, the Chinese still support Beijing's policy of occupation and suppression in Tibet. Then, MindStalker says that the Chinese are not to blame for their choice to support Beijing.

    Fucking unbelievable.

    That's like saying that the hijackers are not to blame. They did not know any better.

    1. Re:That is fucking unbelievable. by Troed · · Score: 1

      A lot of Europeans has told USians about Bush and the USA. Despite knowing the facts, the USians still elected Bush and kept their two-party lineup. ... etc.

      Oh irony.

    2. Re:That is fucking unbelievable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize your comming from a socialist (see stage before communist) country makes his point exactly?

    3. Re:That is fucking unbelievable. by eloki · · Score: 2, Insightful

      MindStalker says that he has told many Chinese folks what the real situation in Tibet is. Despite knowing the facts, the Chinese still support Beijing's policy of occupation and suppression in Tibet.

      OK, let's swap the situation around. A Chinese person tells you that the real reason the USA gives aid to Mexico is because they do military research there and keep many underground missile bases in the Mexican desert. Naturally, because you're being told this by a foreigner, who reads their own media about your country, you believe them wholeheartedly. Right?

      I apologise for the example, if you are not an American. But I think it's ridiculous to insist that someone in another country believe what others say is happening in their country, as if it's morally bankrupt not to do so. Not saying they can't or shouldn't believe what someone told them about Tibet, but you simply have to put yourself in that position, as I have suggested above - would you believe everything a foreigner told you about your government? I bet you'd do exactly what the Chinese person has done - nothing.

  70. Re:NASA should keep the study "top secret". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The majority of Chinese support their government on almost all matters of foreign policy. Time/CNN poll in 1997 showed that the majority of Chinese in Hong Kong cheered the unification of Hong Kong and mainland China. That ain't whistling dixie.

  71. 15 minutes to Wapner...yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, definitely Wapner

  72. Re:NASA should keep the study "top secret". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't you be hiding under a bridge somewhere ambushing and eating children?

  73. Scan yourself! by OnlineAlias · · Score: 1

    Ad on the article...

    Pre-owned MRI Scan
    Contact Barrington Medical Imaging with all of your medical imaging equipment
    www.bmimed.com

  74. Re:NASA should keep the study "top secret". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Chinese are animals
    A large proportion of the world thinks the same of Americans, dude...

  75. Re:compare to Bush's brain by stonecypher · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Actually, I'm modding it down because it's totally offtopic, not because I disagree. (Though, he's only actually won one election...)

    --
    StoneCypher is Full of BS
  76. Re:But can he beat Ken Jennings by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    A small town might have that many books. A large city could easily run to more than that. The Vatican, Amazon.com, or the Library of Congress easily runs into the tens of thousands of volumes.

    But separate out the fiction from the nonfiction and I'm sure you'd limit the number of volumes needed greatly.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  77. Re:compare to Bush's brain by geekoid · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    this should be modded down for off topic.
    Beside, if was Karl Rove genius that one him the election...Bush brought the money.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  78. Re:For military purposes, no doubt by mefus · · Score: 1
    NASA doesn't have a military mandate. NASA goals (from wikipedia):
    • To Improve life here
    • To extend life to there, and
    • To Find Life Beyond
    NASA creates information for the public domain. (From the FAQ):
    QUESTION: Is it okay to include information from your web site on my web page?

    ANSWER: Generally, yes. NASA information is in the public domain and can be used on websites for information purposes. Use of NASA information cannot imply a NASA endorsement of any organization, person, or commercial product or service. Except for the NASA logo and seal, agency images may be used on non-NASA websites for non-commercial purposes. Please note that NASA employees, including astronauts and former astronauts, retain the legal right to control the use of their likenesses for commercial use. In addition to obtaining NASA's permission to use its images for commercial purposes, clearances may need to be obtained from individuals within those images.
    --
    mefus
    In Open Society, GPL Software frees YOU!
  79. even better by geekoid · · Score: 1

    is it based on a chemical reaction we can isolate in the lab?

    Cause I might be willing to take a pill that makes me twice as smart. Think of what I could do with a 360 IQ!

    heh
    I'd rather take a pill that made me rich.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  80. NEWS FLASH: by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Man gets a LOT smarter as he gets older. His intellegence in certia arenas has probaly raised more then your total IQ.
    Pretty astounding.
    What makes this guy different from other people with autism? Can we figure it out? can we isolate? duplicated? congigate? ;)

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  81. But then by geekoid · · Score: 1

    why is there soup?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  82. I'm an idiot savant ... by workerbeedrone · · Score: 1

    ... I just haven't found my savant yet.

  83. I've met him several times... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's a nice guy. I've met him several times. Frankly it's odd to see him in the news like this.

    I was in a meeting with him and about 20 other people. They had us all go around and introduce ourselves. After anyone said who they were he'd say "Yah, you live at, you live at blah blah. Your phone number is blah blah."

    The person with him kept saying "Quiet Kim, nobody needs to know that." Very disruptive but fun.

  84. So interconnected by ebuck · · Score: 1

    If you're more knowledgable, odds are you're going to be smarter.

    That's because you'll have (in some ways) memorized large portions of what others will have to deduce. Sure, you could re-deduce it each time you need it, but why?

    Of course, this line of reasoning completely fails if you don't take care to stuff your head with an accurate representation of what you're studying. Considering that one of the topics is History, where interpertation and point of view play major roles, I'd gather that Kim isn't some sort of super-encyclopedia, but someone actually processing and incorporating ideas into his internal visualization of the world.

  85. I find it disturbing, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes sir, I too find the racial stereotyping here at Slashdot to be much out of line! Asians and Indians are software engineers just as talented as the White Man!

    Sanjeep Arahuapu



  86. We ALL get smarter as we get older. by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    ... but he apparently is getting smarter in his specialty areas as he gets older...

    Heh, don't we all?

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:We ALL get smarter as we get older. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on how much pot we smoke

  87. the answer is always... by unformed · · Score: 1

    42

  88. Why it's important if he's smarter with age by Kartik3 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I remember watching a documentary or two about autism and something that was repeatedly found was that as an autistic individual tried to remedy their problems with autism (usually getting better with age) their savant like knowledge began to deteriorate. I have always thought that there is almost a finite amount of brain capacity any one individual is able to have. Meaning, while a savant is able to have incredible knowledge of some things, their brain is so devoted to that knowledge that things, like knowing where the silverwear drawer is, get sacrificed. Specifically, I think that the autistic savant's brain begins to lose the amount of speicfic knowledge in their savant areas as they are adapting to a more social lifestyle and expanding the functionality of their brain. (Others have pointed out that Kim doesn't lack the social skills to be considered classically autistic. However I feel that this explaination may still be able to apply to some degree.)

    1. Re:Why it's important if he's smarter with age by oobob · · Score: 1

      I remember watching a documentary or two about autism and something that was repeatedly found was that as an autistic individual tried to remedy their problems with autism (usually getting better with age) their savant like knowledge began to deteriorate. I have always thought that there is almost a finite amount of brain capacity any one individual is able to have. Meaning, while a savant is able to have incredible knowledge of some things, their brain is so devoted to that knowledge that things, like knowing where the silverwear drawer is, get sacrificed.

      The capacity of the brain is functionally unlimited. Look up one of the various amazing people who memorized large amounts of trivial facts as an example. If there is a limit to human knowledge, no person has ever reached it, and that includes Euler. So that's not very plausable.

      I've read the same facts about the loss of savant abilities, but depending on the context, you may not have learned that the specifics related to the loss of autistic powers generally concerns young people who lose one or more amazing feats as they learn to function socially (functioning socially or learning language almost always is associated with the loss of savant abilities: see google.) Since the gain of one skill and the loss of another are so closely related, this seems to suggest a finite processing power in the brain and maybe some plasticity in its parts, not a finite capacity of knowledge.

      Even more specifically, a savant's inability to find the silverware drawer or dress himself likely relates to his cerebellum, which differs from most of ours. My favorite intiutive concept for the cerebellum is "rhythmic autopilot." As we learn procedural tasks and are conditioned to react in various ways, this automatic processing is largely taken up by the cerebellum. It's the conditioning/feedback loop center of the brain and hence governs movement, speaking with others, automated responses to stimuli, and all procedural knowledge. They can't find the silverware because their brains don't click into autopilot when performing these activities. So what seems trivial to us, like getting dressed, is essentially a new task for them every day. Could you imagine having to navigate your world through facts, unable to learn the rhythms of automated procedures we take for granted hundreds of times a day? And, as we'd expect, the autistic also often have differences in their cerebellums: click here for more. Here's a quote from a page of the functioning of the cerebellum, which has an excellent section describing its function (it uses a computer metaphor, so you guys might wanna check it out). Quote:


      The skills involved in human communication, for example, require both motor and mental activity: the motor activity of speech or gesture, and the mental activity that formulates what is to be said. In the course of learning these skills, an individual's performance can be improved incrementally through practice so that the skills eventually can be performed without conscious attention to detail. For example, in recalling words stored in the memory, the activity can be performed without conscious attention to the details of how the words are selected by the brain during the retrieval process.


      In social interaction, we take for granted automatic signals like voice tone, body language, or even the specific words we're using (I've never met anyone who thought over every word every time they spoke). My guess is that the plasticity of the brain allows the unused sections in autistics that are normally used for activities like social interaction to adapt for other uses, hence generating the autistic ability. When these brains are rightfully claimed by their social or lingusitic origins, the computing power is lost and the sa

  89. and democracies sometimes elect fascists by DrunkClam · · Score: 0

    really communism in Russia came out after a monarchist government, and in China it came after a nationalist government.

  90. Re:compare to Bush's brain by crayz · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The IQ extrapolation is great, but even if it's accurate for back when he took it, I doubt it is now, after years of boozing and snorting coke

  91. Moral point of view by ebuck · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It's lost on some people, but morality isn't a universal constant (like c) but is influenced by point of view.

    The Chinese Government has constantly tolerated and even promoted the mass violation of most product protection laws. As a mainland Chinese why they are burning copies of MS Windows instead of buying it, and they'll look at you as if you've lost your mind. Only when the Government decides that it's no longer in their interest to promote this activity will the moral values of China shift.

    But it's not just limited to China. Many Christians should remember that many of the Biblical characters were poligimists (Jacob, Leah, and Rachel, anyone?) and had less than perfect lives (Noah exposing himself in a drunken stupor). But today's moral values don't permit any of this behavior.

    Blaming someone about their lack of your moral values makes little sense, especially across culture divides as great as those in the U.S.A. and China.

    1. Re:Moral point of view by MenTaLguY · · Score: 2, Informative

      Many Christians should remember that many of the Biblical characters were poligimists (Jacob, Leah, and Rachel, anyone?) and had less than perfect lives (Noah exposing himself in a drunken stupor). But today's moral values don't permit any of this behavior.

      Or corrupt prophets trying to put words in the mouth of God, or Lot's daughters getting him stone drunk and sleeping with him, or Moses murdering the Egyptian man, or David abusing his position as King to get a woman to sleep with him when her husband was away (and then getting her husband killed when he was in danger of being found out).

      I'm not sure it's the best comparison to make the point you're making, though. The thing to realize is that an awful lot of these things weren't even acceptable in the culture of the day, either. Someone being mentioned in the Bible doesn't automatically constitute an endorsement of their behavior; very often these Old Testament things are in part cautionary tales, going on to show that the same people invariably suffered the consequences of their actions. Even when occasionally the original author of a section does appear to have approved, the consequences are still plain for later readers to see.

      Even the polygamy of some Old Testament figures (which was quite acceptable in the culture of their own times) were shown to have adverse consequences for them, their wives, and their descendants. Abraham's experiment in polygamy established two rival claims to the middle east by descendants of his two children; Ishmael (ancestor of the Arab people) and Isaac (ancestor of the Jewish people). With Jacob, in turn, his wives and family suffered as he invariably played favorites and bitter rivalries developed. With that and other examples it's little wonder the Jewish tradition gradually realized polygamy might be a bad idea. The culture permitted David a lot more leeway as King in that regard, but reading the whole store you're left with the sense that perhaps it shouldn't have.

      As for Noah.. I guess that mostly just comes down to a rather embarassing family memory and a lesson in responsible drinking. Just imagine coming home from a night out with your brothers to find your centenarian father passed out drunk and naked in the middle of the tent. Or don't. Not the best mental image. :P Probably everybody laid off the alcohol for a while after that one.

      These were the stories of the people and situations from which "today's moral values," to the extent that they have "Judeo-Christian" roots, ultimately emerged. "Today's moral values" in that sense are probably closer to "lessons learned".

      I think it is an attempt to suggest a notion of morality that doesn't depend on a single culture's ideals. These folks did screw up, whether or not their actions were culturally acceptable to their contemporaries. They hurt themselves, and they hurt other people. But there is another point also; the God described is one that was still willing to deal with them, if they were willing repent and deal with Him. More than caution, it does try to offer some hope, too.

      --

      DNA just wants to be free...
    2. Re:Moral point of view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the Muslims believe in those prophets, but do not believe that Noah, peace be upon him, got drunk, nor that Lot, peace be upon him, fornicated like that. Those sort of stories are a result of the corruption of the Biblical texts. For a different take on it, read their stories in the Qur'an. (its even online)

  92. Another interesting side note: by geekoid · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    No one gives a rats ass.

    Take you cult ravings elsewhere.

    Latter days,...Saint!

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Another interesting side note: by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Bush won! four more years of rape, pillage, burn and rape!

      You said rape twice!

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  93. Intellignece (Reasoning vs. Knowledge) by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    What I'm curious about, it while he may be a walking encyclopedia of fact, how good is he at reasoning? I Googled the name, 'Kim Peek', to read some articles about him, but they are not clinical descriptions of his abilities and limitations.

    For example, if we can take Dunstin's performance as a roughly accurate description of how he might behave, an interesting scene is the 'Quantis is Safer' bit. Tom and Dustin are trying to get somewhere. Dustin's character insists on flying on Quantis, on the grounds that it has the best safety record, having never crashed a plane. That is a fact that has a bivalent value that can be checked as being true or false. However, the scene illustrates that the character portraied by Dustin cannot deal with relative 'Fuzzy' concepts very well. Since major Airlines are very safe, and the relative numbers of accidents are so low, nobody worries if you have a .00001% greater chance of dying on one carrier over another. Most people would see this point very quickly, and simply buy a ticket on the fastest flight, or cheapest fair. How is the real Kim at this sort of reasoning?

    I mentioned 'Fuzzy' concepts above; there happens to be a branch of logic called 'Fuzzy Logic' that deals with set logic, and vague concepts. Things like getting a computer to work out how tall you have to be before you can be called 'tall'. It would be interesting to give Kim a book on the topic and have a discussion with him about it.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Intellignece (Reasoning vs. Knowledge) by sv0f · · Score: 2, Informative

      What I'm curious about, it while he may be a walking encyclopedia of fact, how good is he at reasoning?

      I know more about intelligence and working memory than autism in general and autistic savants in particular.

      However, there is one absolutely fascinating case -- Temple Grandin. She is autistic, but incredibly high functioning. She has a Ph.D and is a leader in animal ethonology. This sounds like a bullshit field, but here's the payoff: she's the world's leading designer of livestock handling equipment. Meating processing plants are pretty inhumane places. She designs the part where the livestock are unloaded from trains and trucks, penned up, and then ushered to the place where the killing happens. Her designs somehow put the animals at ease. I know, I know, it sounds weird. She somehow has high empathy for the beasts, which is especially impressive given that autistics often have profound problems negotiating even trivial social situations.

      I don't know about Kim Peek, but I would classify Grandin as a designer of the highest caliber. I encourage you to spend some time learning about her. Just Google for "Temple Grandin Autism" and you'll be on your way.

    2. Re:Intellignece (Reasoning vs. Knowledge) by VeriTea · · Score: 1

      I was just reading I Think In Pictures by her the other day. She has a unreal ability to predict how the animals will react to things in the processing plant. That doesn't seem hard until you realize that something as small as sunlight glinting off of a swinging chain can cause cattle to startle and become unmanageable.

      --
      --- There are two kinds of people, those who accept dogmas and know it, and those who accept dogmas and don't know it
  94. Kinda like engraving Elbereth on your undies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wards to keep away succubi & incubi? Or perhaps just over-eager SOs. Whichever.

    Surely nothing Slashdotters have need of, with their vast array of natural defenses against this sort of thing, like odor, personality, etc. In fact, I doubt many here encounter this sort of thing at all, unless playing Nethack.

    I wonder if the symbols spell "Elbereth" in those pseudo-hieroglyphs the Mormons use? I mean, so many great Moron scholars have studied those symbols. Hmm...

    Speaking of which, what were you doing with Mormon underpants, anyhow?

  95. Moral Relativism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm okay with moral relativism, which the parent writer suggested. According to him, we should not judge another society's values.

    I propose that we catch Chinese folks and use them for medical experiments. These experiments will produce far better results than rat experiments.

    1. Re:Moral Relativism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moral relativism is an important idea, but it's something you have to be careful with. The specifics of morality vary from society to society, but there are some common threads between them. I don't know of any society that doesn't hold the view that murder is wrong even though most societies believe there are exceptions when human life should be taken.

    2. Re:Moral Relativism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I propose that we catch trolls like you and use them for medical expeirments. These experiments will produce far better results than rat experiments.

    3. Re:Moral Relativism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard once about a primitive tribe living in a remote jungle region somewhere in S. America that prized the concepts of murder and betrayal. When missionaries visited them and showed the "Jesus" film, the natives thought that Judas was the hero.

    4. Re:Moral Relativism by RsG · · Score: 1

      >I propose that we catch trolls like you and use them for medical expeirments. These experiments will produce far better results than rat experiments.

      But then we might accidentally unleash a new breed of troll savants! Cabable of ruining even the most enlightened /. discussion (snicker!) Can you imagine lab trolls escaping and wreaking havoc? No bridge would be safe to walk under; no goat would go unmollested! No one would be able to converse without starting a flame war. It'd be the end of civilization! :-(

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
  96. I hear... by chillmost · · Score: 1

    I hear he's an excellent driver.

  97. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  98. Child Buyer Reprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think analysis may be a good first step, but for best results, the army should simply 'recruit' a few savant babies/youngsters, exposing them only to militarily useful references, offering surrogate family relations, etc. I'm sure they'll all perform perfectly, but ass-covering decisions by middle management will ensure that their resources and abilities will be wasted, just as information resources are wasted now whenever they don't confirm to the reality that our job requires that we create and project.

  99. WTF - mod ate some weed by syrinje · · Score: 1

    This is informative? Sheesh - you guys are taking all the fun out of the parents patent troll.

    --
    See that long UID - that's what you get for lurking too long
  100. The worst though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is when your wife MOVES things that have been in the same place for a while, and totally messes up your "physical" memory... I still go to the wrong cupboard every time I want a paper plate - and it's been three months since she switched things around.

  101. He is a Mentat from Dune. by Jagasian · · Score: 1

    In the fictional Dune universe, there was a Matrix-like AI revolt, followed by an extended war between humans and AI. After the war was resolved, the humans decided to use human computers known as Mentats, which were "giga-savants", that had their minds altered by injesting a special form of the spice.

    1. Re:He is a Mentat from Dune. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mentats could process information though. Kim seems to be more of a library of everything he is interested in.

    2. Re:He is a Mentat from Dune. by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      Kim can do searching and calculations. Those are primitive forms of processing.

  102. Re:NASA should keep the study "top secret". by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    Well that is an intersting except things like censorship, Tibet, and Tiawan are not considered foreign policy in China. Also I would not trust polls in China. They do not have a free press or political system. Again can the average english speaking chinese read slashdot?

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  103. Now that's a genius by skamuel · · Score: 3, Funny

    The 53-year-old Peek is called a "mega-savant" because he is a genius in about 15 different subjects, from history and literature and geography to numbers, sports, music and dates.

    Wow! Slashdotters, this guy could probably help us out with the girls!

  104. The Solution to the Voting Machine Problem!! by orcrist · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm surprised nobody has said this yet. We just have this guy count all the votes!

    -chris

    --
    San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
    1. Re:The Solution to the Voting Machine Problem!! by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      I am sorry, I have to repeat my earlier post to this article. The number of votes will be..

      drum rolls, please:

      98, Definitely 98.

  105. Re:But can he beat Ken Jennings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well sure, maybe. But can you MEMORIZE them all the first time you read them? Maybe I'm just dumb, but I sure as heck can't.

  106. GF / CF diet by VeriTea · · Score: 1
    Oops... I should add that people who espouse the GF/CF diet don't claim that autism is caused by those substances, only that it is much more severe in some children when they are exposed to gluten and dairy.

    Autistic children who are helped by this diet often crave milk and wheat, sometimes refusing to eat almost anything else.

    --
    --- There are two kinds of people, those who accept dogmas and know it, and those who accept dogmas and don't know it
    1. Re:GF / CF diet by jd · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'm not completely convinced, largely because I'm not convinced that autism is a single condition. Nonetheless, it's only fair to note that I've been told I have an abreaction to milk and certain wheat products. This should not be taken as proving the theory, even in just my case, but it certainly doesn't contradict it either.


      I guess the bottom line is that scientists are only now getting round to doing an fMRI (the continuous form of an MRI) on someone who is somewhere in the autistic spectrum, for the purpose of identifying autistic-related phenomina in the brain.


      Ok, fMRI hasn't been around that long, but autism is hardly the rarest of neurological complaints. Nor is fMRI the only diagnostic tool. I'd have expected an assortment of tracers and conventional MRIs to have been used, because that is such a standard procedure. Then there are CAT scans and your average, domesticated EEG.


      By now, there aught to be some good ideas as to what areas of the brain are abnormally active or suppressed, along with some rudimentary guides on verifying a diagnosis with one or more of the above tools. To the very best of my knowledge, no such guides exist and an understanding of the mechanics of autism is extremely limited.


      It should be easy enough to check the heavy metal/autism link, for example. Stockport, England was a heavy center for the manufacture of felt hats in the 1800s and early 1900s. Softening felt used extensive quantities of mercury, and many hatters suffered brain injuries as a result.


      (It is interesting to note that Lewis Carrol, of "Alice in Wonderland" fame grew up in Daresbury, which is a village not far from Stockport, although a link between the "Mad Hatter" and the hatters of Stockport is disputed by some Lewis Carrol scholars.)


      Mercury, today, is often released into the environment as a result of gold mining techniques. Areas actively mined are often heavily contaminated and the locals often show symptoms of acute mercury poisoning.


      So, there aught to be two good tests here. If Stockport in the late 1800s, early 1900s was notorious for people with autistic-like symptoms, AND if those same symptoms are now widespread in areas of Africa and the Amazon that are mined for gold, I think a link would have been pretty much established.


      Although there has been quite a bit of research into the effects of mercury on the Stockport population, I've not seen any suggestion of links to autism. However, that might be that nobody looked for such links.


      Grrr! I wish there was more information, and more research. The lack of good quality information is (to me) unacceptable in an age where the technology for obtaining information is certainly available.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:GF / CF diet by teromajusa · · Score: 1

      Nonetheless, it's only fair to note that I've been told I have an abreaction to milk and certain wheat products. This should not be taken as proving the theory, even in just my case, but it certainly doesn't contradict it either.

      Have you yourself noticed a reaction? Being told you have a reaction certainly does not prove anything. The things I've read about the gluten/casein theory is that these things get turned into a opium-like substance in the body resulting in a permanent stoned state. This seems to be inspired by the a likening of the autistic experience to that of being high.

    3. Re:GF / CF diet by jd · · Score: 1
      It's very hard to self-diagnose. I, personally, have not noticed an abreaction under anything remotely resembling a reasonable intake. When you start getting into the realms of massive intake (a gallon or two over a 10-15 minute period), I'll notice an effect, such as mood-swings.


      This is, again, one reason I really wish there was more known about the mechanics. If, when someone claimed to observe an effect, I could actually get hard data which showed one way or another, I would have something I could rely on. As it stands, what I tend to do is play safe and assume they're observing something and try to make changes accordingly. Undoubtably, though, that means cutting out stuff unnecessarily, and missing stuff that I really should avoid.


      Right now, all I've got to go on is rumor, speculation and half-baked theories, combined with biased observations and food prejudices.


      If it would make things easier on the experts, I'll settle for a brain transplant.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  107. Chinese Baboons Support Suppression of Rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    No, fucker, the poll was conducted by Time/CNN in 1997 in Hong Kong. The Chinese in Hong Kong know full well the dangers of Beijing but support Chinese nationalism anyhow. More than 60% enthusiastically supported the unification of Hong Kong and mainland China.

    The vast majority of the Chinese baboons support censorship and the occupation of Tibet.

    You must be a Chinese fucker since you defend Chinese behavior.

    1. Re:Chinese Baboons Support Suppression of Rights by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I am not Chinese. Actually I belong to one of many groups that are oppressed by the Chinese government. You are without a doubt a mindless little racist I am guessing about 13 years old, without the guts or integrity to post as anything but an AC. I suggest you stop playing Evercrack, get out of your parents basement, and look around at the real world. You are no better and actually a bit worse then most of the people in China. If you where over there why would think the way that they do? What slanted information would make you give the same level of approval that they do? Only then you might understand what conditions they are living under and why the feel the way they do.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Chinese Baboons Support Suppression of Rights by typedef · · Score: 1

      This thread makes me want to order take-out.

  108. 5 for interesting? by jgoemat · · Score: 1

    Maybe 'funny'... Is this supposed to mean he could cure himself? Oh, wait, he would just know what everyone else knows about the disease and not how to cure it...

  109. savant perhaps but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But he is still just a friggin retard

  110. Or... by jgoemat · · Score: 1

    Maybe they just don't like you.

    1. Re:Or... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I think you are only going for funny, but you did see where I mentioned that they wern't warm to their family as well, didn't you?

  111. Re:But can he beat Ken Jennings by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    All this requires is a talent for memory- anybody can learn to memorize. The key with Kim is that his brain is hardwired for memorization in a way yours and mine isn't.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  112. Is Bush dyslexic? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    The USA president appears to a man of limited intelligence on the surface. Yet his college entrance test scores give him an IQ of 128. And he manages to win elections and run the country, more or less.

    Whoah... this has been modded from 2 to -1 since I loaded the page. But I'll reply anyway.

    My personal belief is that Bush probably has some form of undiagnosed dyslexia (*). The "humorous" mistakes he makes remind me of a dyslexic flatmate I had at university. Smart enough guy, who occasionally made incongruous mistakes with his speech. I later found out that some dyslexics are known to do this- IIRC this was at the same time it was suggested that Bush was dyslexic (**).

    This doesn't dampen my view that Bush is anti-intellectual, insular and not particularly intelligent where it matters, who serving as a tool for corporate America and the Christian right-wing.

    Just that we don't need to laugh at what might be a mild form of dyslexia.

    (*) Or maybe it *was* diagnosed, and hushed up. Who knows?
    (**) OTOH, I had another flatmate (in the *same* flat) who was also dyslexic, but never did this.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    1. Re:Is Bush dyslexic? by ThaDerro · · Score: 1

      So have you had YOUR hearing tested? are you sure it was your flatmates that were dyslexic, or you are? :)

  113. More like by jgoemat · · Score: 1

    Mega-complexioned

  114. RainMan by puremisery · · Score: 1, Funny

    "January 12, 1965. Very snowy that day. 12.2 inches of snow that day."

    --
    -- "Life's not fair, but the root password helps."
  115. He could be a great benifit to the country! by bill_kress · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Couldn't we get him to study the election figures, by county for the last 10 elections and see if he noticed patterns indicating corruption (for instance, if electronic voting has helped any one canidate more than others relative to exit polls)?

    He should be able to visualize patterns better than any computer because the program has to be pre-programmed to look for a pattern related to a specific cause, he should see it as easily as we would a peak in a graph.

  116. If only he would study..... by torok · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If only we could get this guy to study neurology or something like it to such detail - maybe he could tell us what makes him so smart?

  117. Resurrect Sidis by div_B · · Score: 1

    memory capacity does not equate intelligence. that is why these folks are "savants" he can recall everything he reads, but he can't really extrapolate new data from it. that's the issue.

    Maybe we should resurrect William Sidis then, and ask him?

  118. Impressive capacity by div_B · · Score: 1

    They ranged from obscure baseball facts from 50 years ago, to a student standing up, stating his name and hometown and asking for his address and phone number. No-one succeeded in stumping Peek.

    So, what I want to know is, if I had several of this guy's brain, could I form a RAID array from them?

  119. 'Spock - His Brain is Gone!' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhm,

    Should someone make sure that after he enters NASA,
    that he comes back out ?

  120. At lunch, my friends can't find their wallets! by ishmalius · · Score: 1

    We should apply for a research grant.

  121. MMR study retracted by Masarius · · Score: 1

    I noticed that some people mentioned MMR (Measles Mumps Rubella vaccination) as a possible cause for autism. Looks like it has just recently been retracted - Controversial MMR and autism study retracted

  122. Grandparent article is right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, the grandparent article is correct. It has solid evidence to indicate that the Chinese overwhelmingly support Chinese nationalism and Beijing. What kind of baboon would enthusiastically support unification of mainland China and Hong Kong? The Chinese kind would, apparently.

  123. Rain-Man's little secret by nusratt · · Score: 2, Funny

    "But he also is severely limited in other ways, like not being able to find the silverware drawer at home or dressing himself."

    So, apparently he has exceptional abilities ONLY in things which are interesting.
    And everything else, someone else has to do it for him.
    How conveeeeeeeenient...

    Slickest scam I've ever seen.

  124. Main Character? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the main character in Rain Man was Charlie Babbitt played by Tom Cruise. Not Dustin Hoffman didn't deliver a good performance but Tom's character is the one developed and grew as a person.

  125. NASA should try doing NASA stuff -not psychology by mschaffer · · Score: 1

    Or are they trying to figure out why they can put a man on the moon in the 60's but can barely keep things in orbit in the 21st century.

  126. Re:NASA should keep the study "top secret". by Ender_Wiggin · · Score: 1

    Well, it seems to lead to oppression. I mean, the government locked up thousands of people post-9/11, and hate crimes went up, and racism rose to some of the mainstream.

  127. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of scientists working so hard, why don't they just ask him himself?

  128. More reading on subject by LarsWestergren · · Score: 1

    I thought the Tom Cruise character in the film Rain Main was loosely based on Dr Oliver Sacks. Turned out I was wrong. However, there are many similar cases of autism described in his great book "The Man who Mistook his Wife for a Hat".

    This is a fascinating and slightly frightening book. One of the cases there WAS made into a film, Awakenings with Robert DeNiro and Robin Williams.

    Some of the other cases include the title character; a man who keeps adressing his hat as if it was his wife, a woman who has lost all "sense" of her body and feels as if she is trapped in a tomb of someone elses dead flesh, people who can see only details and not wholes, people who are unable to form new memories (exactly like in Memento), people who seem to have lost "nodes" in the "tree" of knowledge that they use to experience and interpret the world.

    Great book, defenitely worth a read.

    --

    Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

  129. Re:NASA should keep the study "top secret". by ninji · · Score: 1

    EXACTLY, its the same thing, if the US government told us someone needed our help (iraq sound framilier) the country tends to generally take their word for it. And while both Iraq and Tibet are in considerable conditions (while in far differnt ways) its easy to say you want to help but doing it in a way the people of the area your 'helping' would rather not be helped by... I mean, if you can't turst your government... oh wait....

  130. Re:NASA should keep the study "top secret". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "framilier"?