We've had reasonable range from Electric cars for a while now. For most commuters, Even 100 miles a day is plenty, and that allows some longer journeys as well. Especially in Europe, where cities are closer together.
But on those occasions you do need to go further, you need to stop and recharge. A regular fuel powered car, this just requires a minor inconvenience of stopping, refuelling and heading off again. Electric cars though - it takes an hour to fill up the battery, and that's at a Tesla Supercharger station. Even after the infrastructure has improved, that's something that requires a certain amount of prior planning.
22-26 episode seasons seems to be an aspect of the US production model though. And while it works fine for episodic shows, when there's a degree of continuing storyline, they tend to drag a little during the mid-season. I prefer it when they have shorter seasons and a more compact story. If they can give us more variety, I'm happy with that too.
Essentially though, I want a decent camera that takes photos.
Portrait mode looks like an effect to compensate for technical limitations of the hardware. It's great that you can do that! I agree, I can see why people might want a one stop solution, and a phone camera is really good especially in bright conditions (even a crappy Android one), but there is a nice for a good compact.
Optical zoom, larger CCD, decent ones have aperture and shutter speed settings. My camera has continuous shooting mode.
There's no need for a cheap compact camera if you have a phone, but there are some pretty decent ones that cost way less than an iphone, and even give you adequate change for a cheaper phone.
The mid range compacts have always been a niche item anyway.
It's only natural, when finding a bug, to test it and confirm that it is a bug. If a front door is unlocked, you might reasonably push on it, poke your head in and shout "is anyone home?". And then leave a note on the doormat.
I'd say he did the minimal possible to confirm there was a problem.
or perhaps reprogram your immune system to recognise the transplant as native rather than foreign.
I've heard about this happening; someone's immune system was destroyed for something unrelated. When it was restored, a transplant patients no longer needed immunosupressants. There is some research into doing this specifically to deal with transplants.
A good thing. Great though these drugs are, they cause all sorts of problems, making people more susceptible to sickness (minor ailments can be fatal), and they increase the risk of cancer.
People believe that contracts are absolutely binding. While it is wise to treat every clause as legally binding before signing, courts are allowed to use a little common sense to determine whether the person signing actually understood what they were agreeing to.
Computers are used at work because the utility gained is greater than the cost of distraction. If it's the other way round then they should stop using computers.
Working out who to blame is a distraction, but if removing computers is the most efficient solution then go for it.
I used the term ironically because I was expecting Anti-Trumpers to leap on my comment and accuse me of being a Trump-fanatic. I was expecting people to either get the irony, or be so partisan that they miss it entirely because it agrees with their preconceptions.
Slashdot Mirror
We've had reasonable range from Electric cars for a while now. For most commuters, Even 100 miles a day is plenty, and that allows some longer journeys as well. Especially in Europe, where cities are closer together.
But on those occasions you do need to go further, you need to stop and recharge. A regular fuel powered car, this just requires a minor inconvenience of stopping, refuelling and heading off again. Electric cars though - it takes an hour to fill up the battery, and that's at a Tesla Supercharger station. Even after the infrastructure has improved, that's something that requires a certain amount of prior planning.
Still a risk here though. PCs can get stolen, or infected with viruses, or destroyed in a fire.
Nobody cares enough to even ask for an excuse. But if you're going to a red carpet event, you want to look good!
Is this news about the fact that it was delayed until September? Surely we knew about this back in January.
It's only a test of concept.
22-26 episode seasons seems to be an aspect of the US production model though. And while it works fine for episodic shows, when there's a degree of continuing storyline, they tend to drag a little during the mid-season. I prefer it when they have shorter seasons and a more compact story. If they can give us more variety, I'm happy with that too.
9 months is probably long enough to make a show; not just fix it. At least assuming they have sets and a couple of decent scripts.
Hey, I want to be outraged! Don't bring your facts into this!
The law gets things wrong sometimes. This developer has been able to challenge the procedures used and should get recompense.
If you're like me, you do, but rejected the correct answer because it seemed so silly.
It's explained reasonably well by analogy with the Parable of the Ox Explained here on the BBC's excellent "More Or Less" radio programme/podcast, but if you prefer to read here's the author's post.
Essentially though, I want a decent camera that takes photos.
Portrait mode looks like an effect to compensate for technical limitations of the hardware. It's great that you can do that! I agree, I can see why people might want a one stop solution, and a phone camera is really good especially in bright conditions (even a crappy Android one), but there is a nice for a good compact.
Optical zoom, larger CCD, decent ones have aperture and shutter speed settings. My camera has continuous shooting mode.
There's no need for a cheap compact camera if you have a phone, but there are some pretty decent ones that cost way less than an iphone, and even give you adequate change for a cheaper phone.
The mid range compacts have always been a niche item anyway.
Even a decent compact is better than a phone camera. There's a limit to how good you can make a camera when you have to make it so thin.
Yes. The person who you were responding to was doing just that. as are you.
Freedom of speech! Great, isn't it!?
It's only natural, when finding a bug, to test it and confirm that it is a bug. If a front door is unlocked, you might reasonably push on it, poke your head in and shout "is anyone home?". And then leave a note on the doormat.
I'd say he did the minimal possible to confirm there was a problem.
Probably From Blackadder. "Madder than Mad Jack McMad, the winner of last year's Mr. Madman competition"
I've heard about this happening; someone's immune system was destroyed for something unrelated. When it was restored, a transplant patients no longer needed immunosupressants. There is some research into doing this specifically to deal with transplants.
A good thing. Great though these drugs are, they cause all sorts of problems, making people more susceptible to sickness (minor ailments can be fatal), and they increase the risk of cancer.
My password is ************.
We have millions of people going through each airport every year. You'll need a pretty huge database. And a lot of people look fairly similar.
Are the false match rates really good enough to make this worthwhile?
Quite true.
People believe that contracts are absolutely binding. While it is wise to treat every clause as legally binding before signing, courts are allowed to use a little common sense to determine whether the person signing actually understood what they were agreeing to.
Isn't there a European record industry association, or a consortium of national associations that would be better placed here?
Computers are used at work because the utility gained is greater than the cost of distraction. If it's the other way round then they should stop using computers.
Working out who to blame is a distraction, but if removing computers is the most efficient solution then go for it.
A class where mathematics is over explained. Or a class where it's under explained. Or explained badly by a lecturer.
I used the term ironically because I was expecting Anti-Trumpers to leap on my comment and accuse me of being a Trump-fanatic. I was expecting people to either get the irony, or be so partisan that they miss it entirely because it agrees with their preconceptions.
So it has nothing to do with Trump's ban on those countries has it?
US immigration is a law unto itself and usually pretty arbitrary. I realise a lot of the world's problems are Trump's fault, but not all of them are.