Honestly, I think it's just a matter of scale. I'm sure that if WoW can be used for money laundering, it is being used for money laundering, but there are limits to how much you can trade here. WoW transactions never exceed a few thousand dollars, and these are rare. Bicoin transactions worth tens of thousands of dollars occur several times a day.
Google managed to develop and market Chrome, and get a lot of people interested in it. They make no money directly from Chrome. It exists entirely for the indirect benefit to their advertising revenue.
A consortium of internet advertisers must be able to produce a fair amount of cash. More than woul dbe needed for developing a piece of software (Mozilla seems to have an annual budget of about $2 million which is not a vast amount for a lot of companies). A lot of the technology is freely available and cna be used even in a closed source browser.
All they need to do is make it better than firefox and give people the choice. If one of the improvements is a "relevant and diverse Internet experience" then that's a marketing point. If people actually don't like thid party cookies, then they'll need to make a better browser to encourage pepel to accept the cost. I'm sure that's quite possible.
At least once a day is too predictable. It's the sort of thing they could get used to. We need to frisk a set number of city officials each day, selected at random. This way each city official may go several days without getting frisked or get frisked several times in one day.
By providing a simple to use alternative for subscribers. A lot of people are going to have a Gold acccount anyway. For most people who care this is part o the bundle they'll receive.
Online purchasing has a minimum cost ot make it effective. This is one area where you may still get better prices on the high street. Especially given the existence of 99p/99Â/99Â¥ stores. Plastic items can be moulded cheaply so these stores will provide a direct alternative.
The free market is not a magic bullet. Most people want regulated taxis yet the free market does not provide.
But if you want an argument that fits with your concept of a Libertarian utopia, then the owner of the airport gets to make the rules about who is allowed to pick people up there.
They can hire their buddy's incompetent kid, who can't tie his own shoelaces, and pay him $250000 a year for doing nothing
That's $250000 not spent on something that will help them win an election. And how does this benefit the politician?
Then when his political career is over, he gets hired by the people he helped on the way.
Yes, but that's a separate area of corruption. They'll get this perk whether campaign contributions are legal or not.
Never mind the info they are allowed to profit on, that if they were company employees would be considered insider trading. Instead it's just another profitable perk of being in office.
What does this have to do with voting against the legality of campaign contributions?
The lawmakers don't benefit. It's essentially an arms race. The "bribery" comes in the form of campaign contibutions. They're committed to spending that money in order to win the election. Their opponents are forced to do the same. The net result is that the lawmakers and any challengers sacrifice some of their own power but the don't gain anything.
If they voted against this, then their ability to fight the election would be reduced but so would that of their opponents.
Volkwagon know about it and this gives them time to patch it. They're the only ones in a position to do so anyway. This is not an OS. The detailed security is not handled by users but by the manufacturer. If you have a VW and you know that a specific code sent on a specific frequency will unlock your car, what are you going to do with this information?
A large number of "bad actors" don't have the skill to replicate the results. And it's not like there's a mailing list of those who do. It will take time for the ones who can do so to repleicate this.
He should have disclosed without notifying. That way they could not have stopped him.
The obvious resul of this wuld be that the poblem would be exaccerbated. As such he could potentially be held liable for any cars stolen as a result of the publication. More than one person can be at fault here. By disclosing, he demonstrates good faith.
The circular tube map addresses a problem but doesn't completely solve it. The spokes work. The circular parts aren't so good. The ones that head away from the city converge to the central axes. The Victoria Line and and Bakerloo Line have disconcerting hooks that make them very hard to follow.
It's very hard to see what lines connect to what lines in southern Manhattan.
Looking at both of them, tell me, where do I change from Line G to Line 7? How about Line A to Line 1? Line B to line G? This is a lot easier on the circular map.
Not really. It's diagrammatic. The London Underground has had a map similar to this since the 1930's. Usually people will be given directions from the nearest tube station.
You can use this in conjunction with an actual map if you really need to.
I agree with all your criticisms. But what ui doesn't have the destructive window closing button issue? As for #6, has anyone implemented a start menu alternative that is actually any good?
What about Nova which means in Spanish (IIRC) "Won't Go". Or in Germany,
This isn't really true. Nova means nova. It's an obvious pun perhaps but it's like calling someone notable because they lack dining furniture.
Pschitt Cola.
Not a problem for something not sold in English speaking countries.
Or Windows. What a fucking stupid name. Office? Ridiculous. Access??? WTF?.
Nothing offensive about these.
Or what about "Squirting"?
Yes. That is a stupid name too.
No, the only problem retards have with GIMP is that it's a damn sight more worthwhile than Photoshop.
In what way?
Re:KDE and Gnome are still comparable
on
The Last GUADEC?
·
· Score: 1
Gnome does have a slight bias in that there are more hits for other meanings of gnome. Look at the highlight markers. One of them refers to a 3D animation about gnomes
Slashdot Mirror
Honestly, I think it's just a matter of scale. I'm sure that if WoW can be used for money laundering, it is being used for money laundering, but there are limits to how much you can trade here. WoW transactions never exceed a few thousand dollars, and these are rare. Bicoin transactions worth tens of thousands of dollars occur several times a day.
Google managed to develop and market Chrome, and get a lot of people interested in it. They make no money directly from Chrome. It exists entirely for the indirect benefit to their advertising revenue.
A consortium of internet advertisers must be able to produce a fair amount of cash. More than woul dbe needed for developing a piece of software (Mozilla seems to have an annual budget of about $2 million which is not a vast amount for a lot of companies). A lot of the technology is freely available and cna be used even in a closed source browser.
All they need to do is make it better than firefox and give people the choice. If one of the improvements is a "relevant and diverse Internet experience" then that's a marketing point. If people actually don't like thid party cookies, then they'll need to make a better browser to encourage pepel to accept the cost. I'm sure that's quite possible.
At least once a day is too predictable. It's the sort of thing they could get used to. We need to frisk a set number of city officials each day, selected at random. This way each city official may go several days without getting frisked or get frisked several times in one day.
It's highly trained athletes at the top of their game competing to excel.
You don't have to like it but if you criticise it because you don't understand why people like it, you end up looking stupid.
By providing a simple to use alternative for subscribers. A lot of people are going to have a Gold acccount anyway. For most people who care this is part o the bundle they'll receive.
You're not going to keep it secret from the person you threaten. That could be the person you want to keep it secret from.
True. But that is at least something that can't easily be automated, and can't be done without anyone knowing.
Would have been briefer to have used the long form.
Online purchasing has a minimum cost ot make it effective. This is one area where you may still get better prices on the high street. Especially given the existence of 99p/99Â/99Â¥ stores. Plastic items can be moulded cheaply so these stores will provide a direct alternative.
The free market is not a magic bullet. Most people want regulated taxis yet the free market does not provide.
But if you want an argument that fits with your concept of a Libertarian utopia, then the owner of the airport gets to make the rules about who is allowed to pick people up there.
That's $250000 not spent on something that will help them win an election. And how does this benefit the politician?
Yes, but that's a separate area of corruption. They'll get this perk whether campaign contributions are legal or not.
What does this have to do with voting against the legality of campaign contributions?
It's only an option is enough people agree at the same time that it's time for a revolution.
A lot of people simpyl don't care.
Actually, no.
The lawmakers don't benefit. It's essentially an arms race. The "bribery" comes in the form of campaign contibutions. They're committed to spending that money in order to win the election. Their opponents are forced to do the same. The net result is that the lawmakers and any challengers sacrifice some of their own power but the don't gain anything.
If they voted against this, then their ability to fight the election would be reduced but so would that of their opponents.
A large number of "bad actors" don't have the skill to replicate the results. And it's not like there's a mailing list of those who do. It will take time for the ones who can do so to repleicate this.
The obvious resul of this wuld be that the poblem would be exaccerbated. As such he could potentially be held liable for any cars stolen as a result of the publication. More than one person can be at fault here. By disclosing, he demonstrates good faith.
Wasn't it simply because Henry Ford himself used that as a justification.
The circular tube map addresses a problem but doesn't completely solve it. The spokes work. The circular parts aren't so good. The ones that head away from the city converge to the central axes. The Victoria Line and and Bakerloo Line have disconcerting hooks that make them very hard to follow.
It's very hard to see what lines connect to what lines in southern Manhattan.
Looking at both of them, tell me, where do I change from Line G to Line 7? How about Line A to Line 1? Line B to line G? This is a lot easier on the circular map.
Not really. It's diagrammatic. The London Underground has had a map similar to this since the 1930's. Usually people will be given directions from the nearest tube station.
You can use this in conjunction with an actual map if you really need to.
Where are the other people going to get the information from if the people who created it can't publish it?
A decent Time mechanism would be great. I'm worried we might end up having to juggle three of them.
I agree with all your criticisms. But what ui doesn't have the destructive window closing button issue? As for #6, has anyone implemented a start menu alternative that is actually any good?
This isn't really true. Nova means nova. It's an obvious pun perhaps but it's like calling someone notable because they lack dining furniture.
Not a problem for something not sold in English speaking countries.
Nothing offensive about these.
Yes. That is a stupid name too.
In what way?
Gnome does have a slight bias in that there are more hits for other meanings of gnome. Look at the highlight markers. One of them refers to a 3D animation about gnomes
Phase 7 is profits. You obviously assumed phase 6 was "???".