They just plan to make sure that it gets used for their services. They plan to expand their customer base and kill the competition. Things like negotiating exclusivity deals with apartment complexes, throttling connections for Netflix and Google. But don't expect to get any additional bandwidth out of them without paying through the nose for it.
And then the cocksuckers have the balls to ask for money after pulling shit like this.
Wikipedia is not getting one fucking donation from me until they get rid of these deletion happy mutherfuckers.
Who the fuck cares if an article is notable to you, that the same bullshit, can't fucking call it reasoning because it isn't, that fuckers in Texass used to keep Ã"scar Romero out of their history books Kinda surprised Wikipedia hasn't cited the Texas State Board of Education and removed him from there as well.
If your trying to pick one up here it would defiantly be to your advantage. Just please leave the game books in your car, having VtM books in your pants makes you look like a dork even by church goer standards.
Reply All isn't a problem. As others have mentioned it bcc, how do we teach the ignorant MFs about bcc, perhaps bcc should be the default instead of to and cc?
That's an issue with you and the mother, and still her fucking choice.
Besides, do you really want to see a mother who doesn't want to carry your child to term doing so? What if she wants to go binge drinking? Starts smoking? None of these behaviors are good for the fetus, but she can.
Here's a hint, if you knock a chick up who doesn't want to deal with the consequences, deal with it. Otherwise just keep your dick in you pants.
I also feel that if a prosecutor gets somebody execute, and that person is later exonerated, the prosecutor and possibly the police officers need to be tried for murder as well. And if it can be established that he/she had reason to believe that the person didn't really commit the crime, but pushed on anyway and that should give a possible death sentence as well.
Its not your body. You have no right to decide what a woman wants to do with her body. The decision is hers alone. Everything else is a relationship issue between her and whomever.
Women who are considering abortions need to buy guns and carry them openly just to protect themselves from people like you. Women have the right do defend what they choose to do with their bodies with lethal force.
I happen to know the fucker. And I know the tactics of him and his cronies. If you aren't goose-stepping with them, they will stomp you into the ground, whether or not your in their way.
Remember their saying: "You're either with us or against us."
If you try and compromise with them, they will crush you.
Its very difficult to separate fact from fiction when you are biased against the person asking the question.
I still wouldn't hand over that level of personal information, and if I were cohered to cooperate and friend one of the attorneys under threat of contempt of court, my ass would probably get thrown off because I would indeed rule against the attorney who forced the issue.
Forcing me to do such a thing would be gross invasion of privacy and akin to asking to read emails between myself and my friends.
I have no issues with jury duty, and would serve without hesitation, but I will not cooperate with an invasive asshole.
Do you really think you would be able to overcome your biases if a lawyer questioning you for jury duty wanted your/. login and access to all your personal emails?
Thinking about it, if a lawyer for either side were to ask to friend me or something else, I would immediately tell the judge that I needed to be excluded because I've become prejudiced against that side.
Slashdot Mirror
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2036424&cid=35480444
AT&T is highly anti-competitive, master of bundling and back-room deals.
As far as evil corporate empires go, I would rank them tied with Walmart, Haliburton, SAIC, Exxon-Mobile, and Blackwater Worldwide.
They do want to use the bandwidth.
They just plan to make sure that it gets used for their services. They plan to expand their customer base and kill the competition. Things like negotiating exclusivity deals with apartment complexes, throttling connections for Netflix and Google. But don't expect to get any additional bandwidth out of them without paying through the nose for it.
Only 41%?
That's better than I would have expected.
And then the cocksuckers have the balls to ask for money after pulling shit like this.
Wikipedia is not getting one fucking donation from me until they get rid of these deletion happy mutherfuckers.
Who the fuck cares if an article is notable to you, that the same bullshit, can't fucking call it reasoning because it isn't, that fuckers in Texass used to keep Ã"scar Romero out of their history books Kinda surprised Wikipedia hasn't cited the Texas State Board of Education and removed him from there as well.
If your trying to pick one up here it would defiantly be to your advantage. Just please leave the game books in your car, having VtM books in your pants makes you look like a dork even by church goer standards.
Ishihara and TBS would love this in their crusade against otaku and anime fans.
Reply All isn't a problem. As others have mentioned it bcc, how do we teach the ignorant MFs about bcc, perhaps bcc should be the default instead of to and cc?
Protestant lawmakers.
That's an issue with you and the mother, and still her fucking choice.
Besides, do you really want to see a mother who doesn't want to carry your child to term doing so? What if she wants to go binge drinking? Starts smoking? None of these behaviors are good for the fetus, but she can.
Here's a hint, if you knock a chick up who doesn't want to deal with the consequences, deal with it. Otherwise just keep your dick in you pants.
Length ceased to have meaning when they stopped putting fins on the car.
Many Republicans don't consider Catholics Christians. And many of them also consider the RCC to too liberal.
The religious zealots have already shown they're willing to kill for their cause, so buy a gun and carry it.
I'm pro abortion and pro-death penalty.
I also feel that if a prosecutor gets somebody execute, and that person is later exonerated, the prosecutor and possibly the police officers need to be tried for murder as well. And if it can be established that he/she had reason to believe that the person didn't really commit the crime, but pushed on anyway and that should give a possible death sentence as well.
You can hate the term "Pro Choice" all you want.
Its not your body. You have no right to decide what a woman wants to do with her body. The decision is hers alone. Everything else is a relationship issue between her and whomever.
Women who are considering abortions need to buy guns and carry them openly just to protect themselves from people like you. Women have the right do defend what they choose to do with their bodies with lethal force.
And if you don't like the .sig, guess what? Inhofe was one of the inspirations for it.
Some of us have never liked Ubuntu, but we are happy to see a few others catching up.
Not the office administrator, the lawyers.
I happen to know the fucker. And I know the tactics of him and his cronies. If you aren't goose-stepping with them, they will stomp you into the ground, whether or not your in their way.
Remember their saying: "You're either with us or against us."
If you try and compromise with them, they will crush you.
After the way BSG ended, Ca-prick-a didn't stand, or deserve a chance.
Inhofe is lying again to support his conservative agenda.
I think that right-wing lunatic would be much happier someplace like Saudi Arabia,l and just GTFO out the US.
What's public?
If I have to do something to get a jerk lawyer access, its not public.
Its very difficult to separate fact from fiction when you are biased against the person asking the question.
I still wouldn't hand over that level of personal information, and if I were cohered to cooperate and friend one of the attorneys under threat of contempt of court, my ass would probably get thrown off because I would indeed rule against the attorney who forced the issue.
Forcing me to do such a thing would be gross invasion of privacy and akin to asking to read emails between myself and my friends.
I have no issues with jury duty, and would serve without hesitation, but I will not cooperate with an invasive asshole.
Do you really think you would be able to overcome your biases if a lawyer questioning you for jury duty wanted your /. login and access to all your personal emails?
Thinking about it, if a lawyer for either side were to ask to friend me or something else, I would immediately tell the judge that I needed to be excluded because I've become prejudiced against that side.
And I would be telling the truth.
Just say no, and remind then that they can't access your email, or your home either.