The official android market is dependent on a sim card. Even a phone wont work unless it has a sim card in it. The trick that Archos did with their tablets is they have their own market for apps that work with tablets. Android market could detect apps that assume its a phone (in fact it does now, see the permissions system) and just not display those apps for tablets. The problem has more to do with the Android team is not confident because they have not set up the CTS stuff for tablets. That's ChromeOS's realm. The CTS stuff however is set up for Google TV already. It probably would not be too much work for them to be confident in Android's ability on tablets, they just haven't invested the time/money in it.
Paranoid much? Yeah you can record every conversation from birth to death. But can you record every conversation for 50 million subscribers from birth to death? It gets quite a bit more difficult to do when you're actually providing a service to many people.
And once you get beyond college level (which means - once you start to have to read the literature for yourself instead of relying on someone else to do the hard work for you), you'll find that there is still no consensus about a working definition for "life". The last time I tried to come up with one that I was happy with it took me several hours, and I knew that there were aspects of it that I wasn't terribly confident of.
Yes I'm sure if I was making up definitions I could come up with one I was happy with and included the floor tiles of my bathroom. Unfortunately, definition is defined as "the formal statement of the meaning or significance of a word, phrase, etc. " It is a formal statement. Definition does not mean to come up with something on our own. I have never heard a biologist include prions in the definition of life. I have however heard them give a long list of reasons they are NOT life. Viruses are a little bit more complicated but the general consensus is despite having RNA (the equivalent to DNA in fact iirc it was the pre cursor to DNA) they are not alive.
There's a reason why you're urged to keep up with traffic flow even if the traffic flow is going somewhat over the speed limit. It represents a risk to other vehicles to have people that aren't keeping up.
Funny when I want to traffic school for my job last year, we specifically were urged NOT to keep up with the traffic flow if it is somewhat over the speed limit. By the way, this was the same traffic class they give the police in this state. The problem is we have a lot of misinformed drivers who really need to go to traffic school, perhaps it should be mandatory every 5 years for license renewal. Maybe then we could safely increase the speed limit and have an increase in the number of cautious and attentive drivers on the road.
A major point of legally carrying a gun around in public is so that it can be seen and doesn't have to be used. What good is concealed carry to anybody apart from undercover police (who have other permits to cover it anyway) and organised crime? The general public carrying a hidden gun may get some sort of James Bond vibe but they really have no functional reason to hide their weapon.
Many people feel threatened if they see a gun. I live in a open carry legal state but you need a permit for concealed carry. Whenever someone goes out with a gun on their hip in accordance with state law, inevitably the police get called because someone felt threatened. Concealed carry avoids that, it also means criminals have to think twice, they never know who is carrying a gun. If everyone had to open carry they would always know who is carrying a gun and know to either not take action then or to take out the man with the gun first. Further organized crime types typically already have a criminal record. This is the purpose of the background check for concealed carry. Many states you don't even need a criminal record to be denied a permit. If they go into your background and suspect you are up to no good, no permit for you.
Oh I wasn't trying to claim what you did was crazy in the least. I enjoy stuff like that. I have a cousin who is crazy and really loves doing that. But the fact that he is crazy and the fact that he likes discovering old stuff are unrelated.
Mars has a serious problem in that any time any reasonable level of gases begin to accumulate. You know approaching the levels we might need to terraform it. The sun strips it all away.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and propose that this might just possibly be an edge case and that there's a chance most people are aware of the intended use of the product they are buying.
You'd be surprised. This guy went into a thrift store, found something he had no idea what it was then paid his money to purchase it and bring it home and try to figure out what it was. Sounds stupid right? Try it some time, it's actually quite fun and I know many people who love discovering old stuff and figuring out what it is. Besides, it's a much better use than what the actual purpose of the patent markings are (isn't it just to raise the damages in court when they sue?)
As I recall - Reiser's case was never tried, so no one made their case. He was offered a plea bargain in exchange for leading authorities to his wife's body - again, as I recall.
Actually I believe the case was that he was tried and found guilty, he pleaded innocence the whole time. Then came time for sentencing, they offered him a reduced sentence if he would show them where he put the body so her family could get some closure. Right away he lead them directly to her body.
Open time on the quad is dangerous? Heck if there are dormitories just staying in the dormitory can be dangerous. Even if you have no enemies in the dorm offenders from other dorms sneak in from time to time.
Oh yeah, just to clarify, this was a 3rd year undergrad economics course that I did this paper for. A bit different from citing mental health stuff in the court of law.
I've had professors tell me citing Wikipedia is fine as long as it's done properly. There's a specific way to site an article which gives you a link that goes to a specific revision. Then you can vet the article and make sure the references Wikipedia uses are good. It's really only helpful if you're going to site one article several times and each place in the article you're citing would actually be a separate source. Otherwise you're better off citing the original source.
Plus - it has no sexual side effects like the SSRIs do.
Yeah uh, not quite true. They just go in the opposite direction. It's used often times to balance out other anti depressants because it can spike your libido.
Wow... I don't think you'll find too many people abusing bupropion. I only met one person who ever tried to abuse it, and he only tried once... for good reason too. It has this nasty side effect of causing seizures if you take too high of a dose.
Slashdot Mirror
You do understand that cdma phones have their equivalent of a sim card built in right?
It's not supposed to work without some way of identifying the carrier.
The official android market is dependent on a sim card. Even a phone wont work unless it has a sim card in it. The trick that Archos did with their tablets is they have their own market for apps that work with tablets. Android market could detect apps that assume its a phone (in fact it does now, see the permissions system) and just not display those apps for tablets. The problem has more to do with the Android team is not confident because they have not set up the CTS stuff for tablets. That's ChromeOS's realm. The CTS stuff however is set up for Google TV already. It probably would not be too much work for them to be confident in Android's ability on tablets, they just haven't invested the time/money in it.
Paranoid much? Yeah you can record every conversation from birth to death. But can you record every conversation for 50 million subscribers from birth to death? It gets quite a bit more difficult to do when you're actually providing a service to many people.
Mine has 2 reverse gears, goes forward if you engage both.
And once you get beyond college level (which means - once you start to have to read the literature for yourself instead of relying on someone else to do the hard work for you), you'll find that there is still no consensus about a working definition for "life". The last time I tried to come up with one that I was happy with it took me several hours, and I knew that there were aspects of it that I wasn't terribly confident of.
Yes I'm sure if I was making up definitions I could come up with one I was happy with and included the floor tiles of my bathroom. Unfortunately, definition is defined as "the formal statement of the meaning or significance of a word, phrase, etc. " It is a formal statement. Definition does not mean to come up with something on our own. I have never heard a biologist include prions in the definition of life. I have however heard them give a long list of reasons they are NOT life. Viruses are a little bit more complicated but the general consensus is despite having RNA (the equivalent to DNA in fact iirc it was the pre cursor to DNA) they are not alive.
There's a reason why you're urged to keep up with traffic flow even if the traffic flow is going somewhat over the speed limit. It represents a risk to other vehicles to have people that aren't keeping up.
Funny when I want to traffic school for my job last year, we specifically were urged NOT to keep up with the traffic flow if it is somewhat over the speed limit. By the way, this was the same traffic class they give the police in this state. The problem is we have a lot of misinformed drivers who really need to go to traffic school, perhaps it should be mandatory every 5 years for license renewal. Maybe then we could safely increase the speed limit and have an increase in the number of cautious and attentive drivers on the road.
A major point of legally carrying a gun around in public is so that it can be seen and doesn't have to be used. What good is concealed carry to anybody apart from undercover police (who have other permits to cover it anyway) and organised crime? The general public carrying a hidden gun may get some sort of James Bond vibe but they really have no functional reason to hide their weapon.
Many people feel threatened if they see a gun. I live in a open carry legal state but you need a permit for concealed carry. Whenever someone goes out with a gun on their hip in accordance with state law, inevitably the police get called because someone felt threatened. Concealed carry avoids that, it also means criminals have to think twice, they never know who is carrying a gun. If everyone had to open carry they would always know who is carrying a gun and know to either not take action then or to take out the man with the gun first. Further organized crime types typically already have a criminal record. This is the purpose of the background check for concealed carry. Many states you don't even need a criminal record to be denied a permit. If they go into your background and suspect you are up to no good, no permit for you.
Excellent prison weapon too. Most guards will assume it's just water in the spray bottle.
The points they list are what they teach in just about any biology course you take at the college level as the definition of life.
Oh I wasn't trying to claim what you did was crazy in the least. I enjoy stuff like that. I have a cousin who is crazy and really loves doing that. But the fact that he is crazy and the fact that he likes discovering old stuff are unrelated.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life#Biology I think you'll find prions and retroviruses don't meet the definition of life(btw retroviruses do in fact have RNA)
Mars has a serious problem in that any time any reasonable level of gases begin to accumulate. You know approaching the levels we might need to terraform it. The sun strips it all away.
oxygen-less is pretty easy... mars is Atmosphere-less
I'm going to go out on a limb here and propose that this might just possibly be an edge case and that there's a chance most people are aware of the intended use of the product they are buying.
You'd be surprised. This guy went into a thrift store, found something he had no idea what it was then paid his money to purchase it and bring it home and try to figure out what it was. Sounds stupid right? Try it some time, it's actually quite fun and I know many people who love discovering old stuff and figuring out what it is. Besides, it's a much better use than what the actual purpose of the patent markings are (isn't it just to raise the damages in court when they sue?)
As I recall - Reiser's case was never tried, so no one made their case. He was offered a plea bargain in exchange for leading authorities to his wife's body - again, as I recall.
Actually I believe the case was that he was tried and found guilty, he pleaded innocence the whole time. Then came time for sentencing, they offered him a reduced sentence if he would show them where he put the body so her family could get some closure. Right away he lead them directly to her body.
Open time on the quad is dangerous? Heck if there are dormitories just staying in the dormitory can be dangerous. Even if you have no enemies in the dorm offenders from other dorms sneak in from time to time.
Oh yeah, just to clarify, this was a 3rd year undergrad economics course that I did this paper for. A bit different from citing mental health stuff in the court of law.
But citing wikipedia? dumb. Just dumb.
I've had professors tell me citing Wikipedia is fine as long as it's done properly. There's a specific way to site an article which gives you a link that goes to a specific revision. Then you can vet the article and make sure the references Wikipedia uses are good. It's really only helpful if you're going to site one article several times and each place in the article you're citing would actually be a separate source. Otherwise you're better off citing the original source.
You sure the p-11 locks back automatically? I'll have to try it later but I've got access to a P-40 I can use.
"Automatic" is a superset including selective fire, and semi-automatic weapons.
Ruger lcp as well
Keltec p-11?
Plus - it has no sexual side effects like the SSRIs do.
Yeah uh, not quite true. They just go in the opposite direction. It's used often times to balance out other anti depressants because it can spike your libido.
Wow... I don't think you'll find too many people abusing bupropion. I only met one person who ever tried to abuse it, and he only tried once... for good reason too. It has this nasty side effect of causing seizures if you take too high of a dose.