Slashdot Mirror


User: the_B0fh

the_B0fh's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2,776
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2,776

  1. Re: Video editing... on A Flood of Fawning Reviews For Apple's Latest · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just submitted a link earlier today - the Appleinsider guys spec'ed out a build it yourself computer with the same specs as the high end $10k Mac Pro and it ended up costing them $14,300. That, and your $1k/year in power savings, is quite a bit of TCO savings, for someone who can use that kind of a system.

    http://slashdot.org/submission/3217733/high-end-mac-pro-is-40-cheaper-than-what-you-can-build-it-for

  2. Re:Advancing in what direction? on A Flood of Fawning Reviews For Apple's Latest · · Score: 2
  3. Re:Advancing in what direction? on A Flood of Fawning Reviews For Apple's Latest · · Score: 2

    I don't get it. The only thing this thing is missing, compared to the old Mac Pro, is expandable internal storage. *ONE* extra thunderbolt wire is going to add that much to the clutter?

    You still needed power, monitor and USB cables with the old Mac Pros, so it's not like those cables weren't used.

    One more extra external drive cable, if you don't use NAS/SAN is going to clutter up your desktop that much?

    Seriously?

  4. Re:Advancing in what direction? on A Flood of Fawning Reviews For Apple's Latest · · Score: 1

    In 2000, they were having a good year if they sold 400k computers in a quarter. In 2013, same quarter, they sold 4mil - 5mil computers a quarter.

    How are they not understanding or meeting consumer desires, especially since global overall PC market is dropping by 10% - 20% a year?

  5. Re:Advancing in what direction? on A Flood of Fawning Reviews For Apple's Latest · · Score: 1

    Because of numbers? It's the same reason why Apple tossed the 17" laptops. Very very few people bought them.

  6. Re:Advancing in what direction? on A Flood of Fawning Reviews For Apple's Latest · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why are you shooting holes in his imaginary use cases? Don't you know Apple has to sell a computer for every category out there?! If not, Apple is doomed! DOOMED I TELL YOU!!!!

  7. Re:Jailbreakingg on The iOS 7 Jailbreak Fiasco · · Score: 1

    There needs to be an idiot tag or "not living in this reality" for moderation.

  8. Re:Wrong Focus on Verizon and AT&T Join the 'Transparency Report' Club · · Score: 1

    Except the executives either have no balls to resist, or got paid off not to resist.

  9. What about Room 641A? on Verizon and AT&T Join the 'Transparency Report' Club · · Score: 4, Informative
  10. Re:Still have to rely on the NICs on Ask Slashdot: Can Commercial Hardware Routers Be Trusted? · · Score: 1

    Like that Intel NIC that was reliably going offline when receiving a "corrupted" packet?

  11. Re:Good luck keeping the genie in the bottle on China Rejects 545,000 Tons of US Genetically Modified Corn · · Score: 1

    If you bother to keep up with the news, you'll find that there are serious claims that the people and culture in Egypt today are not the direct descendants of the ancient pyramid builders.

  12. Re:Good luck keeping the genie in the bottle on China Rejects 545,000 Tons of US Genetically Modified Corn · · Score: 1

    How is it trolling to point out there are various definitions for the word "chinese" and when people say chinese empire, it doesn't necessarily mean a king or a series of kings?

  13. Re:Where is the news? on China Rejects 545,000 Tons of US Genetically Modified Corn · · Score: 0
  14. Re:Good luck keeping the genie in the bottle on China Rejects 545,000 Tons of US Genetically Modified Corn · · Score: -1

    Uh, the chinese *PEOPLE* and culture have been in continuous existence.

    Are you claiming the same thing for the pyramid builders in Egypt?

  15. Re:Good luck keeping the genie in the bottle on China Rejects 545,000 Tons of US Genetically Modified Corn · · Score: 1
  16. Re:Stick with what works... on DHS Turns To Unpaid Interns For Nation's Cyber Security · · Score: 1

    Most people just don't get this. Strange, isn't it?

  17. Re:Cyanogenmod, on Cyanogen Mod Raises $23 Million Funding All Set To Become Major Android Player · · Score: 1

    And not just 'fun' features but really important stuff like fine-detailed app permissions management (which has been WAY overdue).

    No way! According to mlw4428 (1029576) at http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4553509&cid=45716831 it is very very very hard to use fine detailed, post install, app permissions management. At least for Android developers...

    [I still don't fucking understand why so many Android developers keep saying it's hard, waah, waaah, when iOS developers have no issues with it]

  18. Re:No... on Proposed California Law Would Mandate Smartphone Kill Switch · · Score: 1

    Have you even read the damned article? All they're bitching about is to make Find my iphone to default to on (ie, opt out instead of opt in).

  19. Re:No... on Proposed California Law Would Mandate Smartphone Kill Switch · · Score: 1

    Because most people are idiots. Idiocracy is a fucking documentary.

  20. Re:Sounds like it worked on Google Cuts Android Privacy Feature, Says Release Was Unintentional · · Score: 1

    You're free to not install the software. You literally have never done software development, have you? You certainly don't make a living off of it if you do. Those of us who do understand that the more time/work we have to put into software for "special use" cases is less profit.

    Strange that iOS developers have no problems doing this. Wonder why this is.

  21. Re:Sounds like it worked on Google Cuts Android Privacy Feature, Says Release Was Unintentional · · Score: 1

    Very interesting. I thought Android was all about freedom for the users.

    Now, it turns out that Android is all about control by the developer.

  22. Re:Sounds like it worked on Google Cuts Android Privacy Feature, Says Release Was Unintentional · · Score: 1

    You are unaware of the multiple times Facebook screwed over Android users then? That one time replacing the default email with their facebook email, the other times, sucking up all your contacts and using it to build your "dark" profile, etc?

    I love how Android users always try to use the exact arguments you use when they get defensive. No platform is perfect. Not iOS, not Android. When there are valid criticisms, take it, and use it to improve the platform instead of behaving like someone with Stockholm Syndrome.

  23. Re:Sounds like it worked on Google Cuts Android Privacy Feature, Says Release Was Unintentional · · Score: 1

    You missed the original post then?

    Does not apply when it is an ubiquitous app that you have to use in order to interact with your peers, friends and family.

    So, ignore them then? Why did you get a smartphone for again? Not to interact with your friends and family?

  24. Re:Sounds like it worked on Google Cuts Android Privacy Feature, Says Release Was Unintentional · · Score: 1

    Funny how *one specific* criticism of Android inevitably brings out Android apologists who go off on a tangent?

    I CAN BLOCK AN APP FROM ACCESSING MY CONTACTS ON IOS.

    I CANNOT BLOCK AN APP FROM ACCESSING MY CONTACTS ON ANDROID.

    Address that issue please.

  25. Re:Sounds like it worked on Google Cuts Android Privacy Feature, Says Release Was Unintentional · · Score: 1

    Does not apply when it is an ubiquitous app that you have to use in order to interact with your peers, friends and family.

    On iPhone, you can block all the permissions you want (contacts, photo albums, microphones, calendar, etc).

    On Android, you can either use it, or not use it. If you use it, it will have all the access it wants. No blocking for you, my dear user.

    I *STILL* cannot see how come Android users can justify this as "good" and "free" and "open. Please do not bring up ROMs or rooting. I'm talking about a vendor supported under warranty phone.