Slashdot Mirror


User: Eponymous+Hero

Eponymous+Hero's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,035
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,035

  1. Re:Hell no on Would You Open Your Home To a Hacker – For Free? · · Score: 1

    no way -- GET OF MY LAWN!! damn hippies. if your hippy girlfriend has free love, then i've got a free room. she has to use the bucket first tho

  2. Re:Strong enough plastics? on 'Wiki Weapon Project' Wants Your 3D-Printable Guns · · Score: 1

    and lets you come up with your own designs. like the internet made everyone a publisher, this could make every one a manufacturer. write your own books and distribute online, design your own gun model and distribute online. watch out, the next **AA will be the NRAA.

  3. Re:Nah on Should Developers Be Sued For Security Holes? · · Score: 1

    this person owns their own business. he's not an advanced dev by any stretch of the imagination. he doesn't use version control, he's just starting to discover "frameworks" though i don't know if he really understands the concept yet. he taped together some php code that let him set a cookie marking himself as as admin, and a setting variable that allowed him to "debug" his code. this was essentially a form box at the bottom of the page that let him run arbitrary code at certain points -- all for the sake of not swapping back to his code editor, saving, swapping back to the browser, refreshing. the site that got attacked was so small i don't know how he was found. my guess is he posted for help on a bunch of forums and left links to his site. i thought it was funny that there was some pdo code in the site, because he'd outsourced to india for a couple months to handle his workload. i've known him for longer than i've known how to code and he has a pride issue with asking me for help in that area.

    if you have a form input box that lets you update variable values with ajax like as if it were firebug, you can skip prepared statements. the overall point is that with enough ignorance and carelessness you can build an app that lets someone abuse every major vulnerability, while still thinking that you're secure, even using prepared statements for your own queries.

  4. Re:Nah on Should Developers Be Sued For Security Holes? · · Score: 1

    i'm not sure where everyone is getting xss from. i said cross-site request forgery, that's csrf. and yes, this person's app was (very poorly) written in php.

  5. Re:Nah on Should Developers Be Sued For Security Holes? · · Score: 1

    i referred to a csrf, not xss. although this poor dev's little hand drawn admin mode was also vulnerable to xss. it was a nightmare to look at.

  6. Re:So... on Fathers Pass Along More Mutations As They Age · · Score: 1

    i think it's jerk, jerk, jerk and maybe ...

  7. what a coincidence on IT Industry Presidential Poll: 'Not Sure' Beats Both Obama and Romney · · Score: 1

    both obama and romney gave that answer when asked "what the fuck are you doing here?"

  8. Re:Strong enough plastics? on 'Wiki Weapon Project' Wants Your 3D-Printable Guns · · Score: 1

    marijuana resin can be used to make plastics stronger than steel. henry ford made a car body out of it and demonstrated it with a sledgehammer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRIvGxCLHGI

  9. Re:Nah on Should Developers Be Sued For Security Holes? · · Score: 1

    prepared statements work great for almost every sql injection attack, but they are not the silver bullet. the structure of your app could allow an xss attack to run a query that doesn't use them, for instance.

    i've also seen some really nasty sql injection attacks using declare, cast and exec to traverse every db, every row, every column and replace every value with an html script tag referencing a foreign-hosted javascript file -- all stemming from a cross-site request forgery that allowed the attacker to run the app as an admin in "debug" mode. almost everything that went wrong with that problem was caused by application architecture.

    the reality is most devs don't get to learn about these things until it happens to them. roll that in your eula and smoke it.

  10. Re:Nah on Should Developers Be Sued For Security Holes? · · Score: 1

    you mean PCI compliance. it's not a law, though some states have laws that borrow heavily from this standard.

    http://www.pcicomplianceguide.org/security-tips-20090227-pci-compliance-law.php

  11. Re:No. on Do Antibiotics Contribute To Obesity? · · Score: 1

    Most people in the South?...

    If so, that could still mean he's overweight.

    FTFY

  12. Re:They Do, Just Not By Much on Do Antibiotics Contribute To Obesity? · · Score: 1
  13. Re:My God on Bill Gates To Develop a Revolutionary Nuclear Reactor With Korea · · Score: 1

    AND, it's not called Vegas, it's LAS Vegas. take your medicine, mcgrew. take it. do it now.

  14. Re:Why Is This Here?? on Hackers Hack Handcuffs at H.O.P.E. (Video) · · Score: 1

    what do you mean, you people?

  15. Re:Which javascript? on Google Employees Find 60 Security Holes In Adobe Reader · · Score: 2

    pdfs are supposed to be rich formatted text documents that can embed images, nothing more. by allowing document creators to embed javascript, they open this medium up to many of the same, and some unique, attack vectors. here's just one example that made the news: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/security/adobe-confirms-pdf-zero-day-attacks-disable-javascript-now/5119. the same poisoned pdfs when rendered through a pdf reader without javascript execution capabilities are harmless. it doesn't really matter how the bad javascript code got there (just that it can be executed if it is there), but your info about livecycle-produced pdfs is interesting.

  16. Re:PDFs on Google Employees Find 60 Security Holes In Adobe Reader · · Score: 5, Insightful

    imho it got out of control when they added executable javascript.

  17. Re:Take it one step further on Scientists Store Entire Textbook In DNA · · Score: 1

    good point. anyone with enough money to make this happen is going to give you the version of history that they wrote.

  18. Re:Should probably fix on Obama Finally Beats Bieber Fever According To Klout · · Score: 1

    a little too excited to get this story out. as soon as "justin bieber" entered his mental typing buffer the whole machinery took a giant crap.

  19. Re:Learned Optimism on Detecting Depression From How (Not What) You Browse · · Score: 1

    chris farley died of an overdose on a mixture of cocaine and heroin known as a speedball. coincidentally, john belushi, another overweight comedic actor, died the same way. it could be argued that depression led to the excessive use of these drugs, but the cause of death is officially drug overdose. not suicide.

  20. Re:Peer-to-peer filesharing? on Detecting Depression From How (Not What) You Browse · · Score: 1

    really? the headline was enough clue for me to know the article is bullshit.

  21. Re:Great.... on Bill Gates Wants To Reinvent the Toilet · · Score: 1

    patenting the buttprint authentication system for toilets. nobody but you will be allowed to use the commode.

    version 2: hydrofluoric acid bidet security countermeasure and automatic facebook update (frees up your hands for, uhh, other activities...).

    false buttprint matches will still be identified via facebook, so your countermeasure incident is posted automatically too. connects to facebook via google TiSP http://www.google.com/onceuponatime/tisp/

    product slogan: protect your shit! crowdsource me plz, you can reach me at those.are.my.stains@buttprintz.com.

  22. Re:Well why not on Bill Gates Wants To Reinvent the Toilet · · Score: 1

    OH SO SORRY! the url is in all lowercase. hope you don't get an aneurysm.

  23. Re:Well why not on Bill Gates Wants To Reinvent the Toilet · · Score: 4, Informative
  24. Re:Reason: on Bill Gates Wants To Reinvent the Toilet · · Score: 2

    kill two birds and make it big enough to flush ballmer

  25. Re:grab a copy now? (is it possible) on Adobe Officially Kills New Flash Installations On Android · · Score: 1
    RTFA:

    The easiest way to ensure ongoing access to Flash Player on Android 4.0 or earlier devices [http://www.adobe.com/go/certifieddevices] is to use certified devices and ensure that the Flash Player is either pre-installed by the manufacturer or installed from Google Play Store before August 15th. If a device is upgraded from Android 4.0 to Android 4.1, the current version of Flash Player may exhibit unpredictable behavior, as it is not certified for use with Android 4.1. Future updates to Flash Player will not work. We recommend uninstalling Flash Player on devices which have been upgraded to Android 4.1.