If I bought a crap game for $60 and only got a couple of weeks out of it, I'd want mre than $8 residual value. Why do people buy sucky games for such prices?
Ugh. That saying has been around for at least 30 years. My guess would be that it originates in the car repair industry, so it could be 100 years or more.
Image quality is proportional to sensor size. There is no "best" compromise any more than there is a car out there that is "best" some people find a compact (car or camera) more convenient, resulting in more good photos purely by availability.
The maxim: the best camera is the one you have on hand when you need to take the shot. Sometimes that is your phone, sometimes you've got something that doesn't fit in you pocket.
This is a nonsense question. The car analogy is like saying you don't have the technical knowledge to drive a hybrid. There is no special knowledge required to use a DSLR... other than perhaps being careful when changing the lense (which mirrorless share).
Even the last (non digital) SLR generations had full auto modes and a full suite of scene modes, just like a compact.
Anti-Israel (ie. against the actions of the current Israeli government) is not anti-Semite. Plenty of Israelis are against these actions of their government also.
Try a little harder. You may feel better about yourself. Cheap ground beef leaving a bad taste in your mind? Make yourself a lentil burger instead! Latest AAA leave you hollow? Play a cheap Indie game!
A lot of how you enjoy something comes from higher-level thoughts. And besides, lentils and Terraria are delicious!
A somehow-independent human colony buried 1 km underground on Earth would be in a safer, cheaper, more easily reached location than anywhere known in space, and would survive any war/famine/pestilence.
Terraforming the Earth from its state in 2100 will be easier than any other known location.
The US claimed the danger was that these people were suspected suicide bombers. A blind bomber in a car is still a bomber in a car. This tech is useless for this. Don't use a laser where a simple GATE will do.
This is not useful against protesters. The police use pepper spray on protestors to hurt and punish, not to protect themselves. A peaceful protestor siting with their arms linked can just close their eyes.
I suspect what he is trying to say is that he stayed with what others would call a "starter home" and paid it off then invested elsewhere, while others instead kept "trading up" are so never owning more than 30-40% of their home, such that when property prices collapsed their equity was zero as their house value only covers the remaining debt on it.
Even if it was because of "hitting big" one time, the point remains to solidify those gains, not use them to leverage yourself to live yet further above your means.
Slashdot Mirror
If I bought a crap game for $60 and only got a couple of weeks out of it, I'd want mre than $8 residual value. Why do people buy sucky games for such prices?
Ugh. That saying has been around for at least 30 years. My guess would be that it originates in the car repair industry, so it could be 100 years or more.
Oh, and Tebow is not original either.
Image quality is proportional to sensor size. There is no "best" compromise any more than there is a car out there that is "best" some people find a compact (car or camera) more convenient, resulting in more good photos purely by availability.
The maxim: the best camera is the one you have on hand when you need to take the shot. Sometimes that is your phone, sometimes you've got something that doesn't fit in you pocket.
This is a nonsense question. The car analogy is like saying you don't have the technical knowledge to drive a hybrid. There is no special knowledge required to use a DSLR... other than perhaps being careful when changing the lense (which mirrorless share).
Even the last (non digital) SLR generations had full auto modes and a full suite of scene modes, just like a compact.
And 18-24 yo children can't vote, can they Mr Perry?
Anti-Israel (ie. against the actions of the current Israeli government) is not anti-Semite. Plenty of Israelis are against these actions of their government also.
So quick to turn to war crimes again.
You are easily fooled. Even the stupidest politician knows to do what their corporate backers tell them to do.
Try a little harder. You may feel better about yourself. Cheap ground beef leaving a bad taste in your mind? Make yourself a lentil burger instead! Latest AAA leave you hollow? Play a cheap Indie game!
A lot of how you enjoy something comes from higher-level thoughts. And besides, lentils and Terraria are delicious!
I respect a silent withdrawal more than Godaddy's self-congratulatory noisy one.
Otherwise, a SPORE creature save file is a better "demo". (note, must install interpreter...)
Huh? How is a wife an example of a car?
A somehow-independent human colony buried 1 km underground on Earth would be in a safer, cheaper, more easily reached location than anywhere known in space, and would survive any war/famine/pestilence.
Terraforming the Earth from its state in 2100 will be easier than any other known location.
Space is no solution to our problems.
They cannot be jailed, but they can be executed.
Well, for example, working 18 hours days is above optimal. Is this so hard for younger retards than me to work out?
The US requires it to declare war before any such action, so no, the aggressor may also call it an act of war.
More theoretical use than a mirror (which would a most deliver 1/4 the power to the shooter), but I doubt they are that efficient.
The US claimed the danger was that these people were suspected suicide bombers. A blind bomber in a car is still a bomber in a car. This tech is useless for this. Don't use a laser where a simple GATE will do.
This is not useful against protesters. The police use pepper spray on protestors to hurt and punish, not to protect themselves. A peaceful protestor siting with their arms linked can just close their eyes.
Reuters, not Retuers too...
I suspect what he is trying to say is that he stayed with what others would call a "starter home" and paid it off then invested elsewhere, while others instead kept "trading up" are so never owning more than 30-40% of their home, such that when property prices collapsed their equity was zero as their house value only covers the remaining debt on it.
Even if it was because of "hitting big" one time, the point remains to solidify those gains, not use them to leverage yourself to live yet further above your means.
Buy from who? A seller. Sell to who? A buyer.
Colour is not the only property of a surface, you diffuse doofus.
Exactly. Are we so poor at reading quotation marks and understanding words like "virtual" that the Daily Mail can upset us?
Why don't you go find out? Or do you like being a ranting redneck dimwit so much you'd rather stay ignorant?