Slashdot Mirror


Arctic Ocean Survey May Reveal Lost World

core plexus writes " A new survey of the depths of the ice-capped Arctic Ocean as reported at Reuters, BBC, and others, could reveal a lost world of living fossils and exotic new species from jellyfish to giant squid, scientists said on Thursday. They speculated that Arctic waters might hide creatures known only from fossils, such as trilobites that flourished 300 million years ago. The international scheme will include probing a 12,470-foot abyss off Canada described by project leaders as the "world's oldest sea water -- a vast, still pool unstirred for millennia, walled by steep ridges and lidded with ice." Bring on the "Jurassic Park" references."

194 comments

  1. The horrors of the deep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    They expect only jellyfish and squids?! Have we learned nothing? What if we awaken some age-old form of life that has been lying dormant in the Earth's seabeds for thousands of years, just waiting fot the perfect opportunity to leap out and assimilate us all?

    Well... dunno about you, but I, for one, pre-emptively welcome our new dark-and-gooey overlords!

    1. Re:The horrors of the deep by ElizaYikes · · Score: 1

      Clearly, we need to issue a warning to all customs officers that if anyone comes through with packages containing strange rocks, they should *under no condition* break that rock apart. If I end up with worms in my eyes, I'm blaming the government. ;)

    2. Re:The horrors of the deep by Wicked187 · · Score: 1

      Assimilate this!

      --
      Politics, Life, and More on my Aspiring for the Future
    3. Re:The horrors of the deep by XeRXeS-TCN · · Score: 1

      That or "The Thing" in any case... find some desolate icy wasteland, that nasty bugger is guaranteed to be lurking in the wings somewhere ;P Tip to the researchers: If you see a crazy guy shooting at a husky, just shoot them both to be on the safe side ;P

    4. Re:The horrors of the deep by orthogonal · · Score: 5, Informative
      What if we awaken some age-old form of life that has been lying dormant in the Earth's seabeds for thousands of years, just waiting fot the perfect opportunity to leap out and assimilate us all?


      You mean in the sunken city of R'lyeh?
      A pulpy, tentacled head surmounted a grotesque and scaly body with rudimentary wings... It represented a monster of vaguely anthropoid outline, but with an octopus-like head whose face was a mass of feelers, a scaly, rubbery-looking body, prodigious claws on hind and fore feet, and long, narrow wings behind. This thing, which seemed instinct with a fearsome and unnatural malignancy, was of a somewhat bloated corpulence...
      -- H.P. Lovecraft, The Call of Cthulhu

      "That is not dead which can eternal lie,
      And with strange æons, even death may die"
    5. Re:The horrors of the deep by druhol · · Score: 1

      Damn, beat me to it.

      --
      WWD4D?
    6. Re:The horrors of the deep by macthulhu · · Score: 1, Informative
      Right on.

      Cthulhu Fhtagn!

      --

      Someday a real rain is gonna come...

    7. Re:The horrors of the deep by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2, Informative

      beat ME to it as well =D

      ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    8. Re:The horrors of the deep by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1, Informative

      Ia Ia Cthulu Fthagn!!

    9. Re:The horrors of the deep by DreadCthulhu · · Score: 1

      Nice to know that people care. :D

    10. Re:The horrors of the deep by Maniakes · · Score: 2, Funny
      Stolen from http://www.urbin.net/EWW/sigs/sf-sigs.html
      To the song, "In the Jungle"
      In R'Lyeh, the sunken city, Cthulhu sleeps to-night.
      From R'Lyeh, the sunken city, Cthulhu will rise tonight.

      Hup! Hup! Hup!

      A weema whep A weema whep A weema whep A weema whep A weema whep A weema whep
      A weema whep A weema whep A weema whem A weema whep A weema whep A weema whep

      Start screeming child, scream my child. Cthulhu rises to-night!
      Screem my child, start screeming child. Cthulhu rises to-night!

      AAAAGGGGGGAAGGAGAGGAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH weema whup a-a
      AGGGGAGAGGAGAGAGHHHHHHAAAAAGGGGGGGGG weema whup a-a
      --
      A legparnasom tele van angolnaval.
    11. Re:The horrors of the deep by bastardadmin · · Score: 1

      I would have gone more in the line of "At The Mountains of Madness", given the polar clime.

      Do Shoggoths qualify as a new species of jellyfish?

      Obligatory quote:
      Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!

    12. Re:The horrors of the deep by bastardadmin · · Score: 1

      So, would Great Cthulhu constitute a new speices of squid, and shoggoths a new breed of jellyfish?

      ***See the wonders of Y'ha-nthlei from $449 inclusive!***

    13. Re:The horrors of the deep by ultranova · · Score: 1
      Do Shoggoths qualify as a new species of jellyfish?

      No, shoggoths qualify as fungi, or more precisely slime molds.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    14. Re:The horrors of the deep by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1

      Black Oil? Feh. It'd be more interesting if they had an encounter similar to the one in The Abyss.

    15. Re:The horrors of the deep by cfuse · · Score: 1

      Bloody hell, why can't they just cast Contact Deep One like the rest of us?

    16. Re:The horrors of the deep by ben_ · · Score: 1
      --
      ben_ the technologist and platform agnostic
  2. Sound Familiar? by s0rbix · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just as long as Ed Harris isn't leading the expedition...

    1. Re:Sound Familiar? by evil-osm · · Score: 1

      No we are quite alright, its being led by Kelly Clarkson and Justin Guarini. So if they find something and return, cool! if they find something and get eaten, cool! Its win win.

      --


      E.

      Never rub another man's rhubarb - The Joker
  3. Doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With water stuff can go anywhere. Even through little cracks below the Earth's surface. Most water dwellers have tiny immature forms that can penetrate these little cracks and end up anywhere. I doubt this will turn out like Australia or the mythical lost world.

    1. Re:Doubt it by Ayaress · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your logic doesn't work. Yes, it CAN go anywhere, but in most cases, it doesn't go anywhere. The Colecanth lives only in a rather limited range. It could swim right up iver to Florida and flop on out the beach and scare the children, but as yet, none have tried that. Also, Arctic water is colder, denser, and less saline than the water in the North Atlantic or Pacific, and many of its animals die of shock when abnormally warm weather brings warm Atlantic water up into the Arctic.

  4. Must we? by AndyMouse+GoHard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "... -- a vast, still pool unstirred for millennia..."

    Until we taint it with our presence.

    --
    Upon seeing the box was too small, Schrodinger's Elephant breathed a sigh of relief.
    1. Re:Must we? by Eudial · · Score: 4, Informative

      Until we taint it with our presence.

      True,the modern bacteria we're going to bring will literarlly obliderate any life that exists in there.

      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    2. Re:Must we? by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      couldn't birds do this? pick up something from somewhere else and drop it into a hole in the ice?

    3. Re:Must we? by rburgess3 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Note: I'm not singling you out for this, there are a bunch of such statements in the threads below, you were just the first.

      You aren't serious are you? I simply cannot believe that you got modded up as 'insightful'. Where would you be without the vikings or Columbus? (I'm assuming that you live in the U.S., if not, please insert appropriate exploratory hero). Exploration is central to what it means to be human. Not exploring is not an option. The only question that remains is 'How?'

      One of the things that you cannot avoid when exploring is changing an environment, not to mention that no environment on Earth (or anywhere else, for that matter) is static, it's going to change anyway. From quantum mechanics to sociology, the mere presence of an observer changes the environment to be studied.

      It is the job of scientists who are exploring previously shut off or shut in environments to do what they can to minimize the change caused by their presence. That's what guidlines and ethics committees are for. Do you for one instant think that any plan for exploration of this previously unknown ecology is not going to pass through the hands of some ethical authority?

      You, sir, have no idea of how science really works. For a wonderful example of how science is really done around fragile and unexplored ecosystems, feel free to educate yourself by googling for Lake Vostock. Scientists have put off their attempts to explore the lake for years because of fear of overt contamination (specifically the micro-organisms that live in the gasoline used to lubricate the drill-bits, amongst a host of others). Here is another good article that explains just how acutely aware of the ethical decisions scientists are.

      Reactionary attitudes like yours serve absolutely no one and simply prove that you haven't bothered to learn how real scientists go about their work before posting smarmy comments.

    4. Re:Must we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehe u said taint

    5. Re:Must we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the modern bacteria we're going to bring
      They may be humblest of God's creatures, but they sure kicked the Martian's
      big red ass.
    6. Re:Must we? by AndyMouse+GoHard · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Dude, are *you* serious? I made a point, which you seem to have grossly misinterpeted. I admit that perhaps the question was better written "Should we?", but I only want the question asked.

      I really have no idea how science really works. Guess what, I'm not a scientist. No, not going to learn how real scientists go about their work either... we all specialize in our respective careers. I'm sure the majority live by a code of ethics that I would approve of, while a minority don't. So don't ask me to be naive and trust all scientists to behave ethically.

      By asking "must we?", I would hope that your question of "how?" gets careful and serious consideration. I believe we both share the feeling that it should be done carefully, right?

      Now, as far as "reactionary"? You, sir, fairly exploded on me.

      Bill

      --
      Upon seeing the box was too small, Schrodinger's Elephant breathed a sigh of relief.
    7. Re:Must we? by AndyMouse+GoHard · · Score: 1

      I'll choose Cartier as my exploratory hero:)

      Bill

      --
      Upon seeing the box was too small, Schrodinger's Elephant breathed a sigh of relief.
    8. Re:Must we? by rburgess3 · · Score: 1

      heh, yeah, sorry 'bout that... umm... it was late? yeah! that's it!

      seriously, I know I was reading into your statement a bit (ok, a whole lot...) but I'll reiterate: I wasn't singling you out, and there are a LOT more reationary answers in a similar vein down the thread-list. By the time I got to writing my little essay, I was piping mad. I'm sorry I took it out on you.

      Roger.

    9. Re:Must we? by AndyMouse+GoHard · · Score: 1

      NP, you were at least well spoken in your comments... and you called me "sir":)

      Cheers,

      Bill

      --
      Upon seeing the box was too small, Schrodinger's Elephant breathed a sigh of relief.
  5. ah the ocean by spacerodent · · Score: 5, Informative

    as an ocean engineer I feel compelled to point out that exploring the depths of the ocean is an assload harder than exploring space. Accordingly we've explored far less of it than space. Technologies are advancing but most of them are directed towards making existing technologies more efficient. We really don't have any improvments for reaching really deep areas and are still using technology pioneered in the 70s.

    1. Re:ah the ocean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Accordingly we've explored far less of it than space.

      I think there is a lot more space than there is ocean. we've explored nearly 0% of space, significantly lower than the percentage of ocean explored.

    2. Re:ah the ocean by ptomblin · · Score: 5, Funny

      Futurama quote:

      "We're taking over 150 atmospheres of pressure!"

      "How many atmospheres can this ship take?"

      "Well, it's a spaceship, so I'd say anywhere between 0 and 1."

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    3. Re:ah the ocean by Sique · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You could use a different approach. Consider a geometrical inversion of the world at the surface of the earth, thus the center of the earth gets mapped to infinity, by setting the radius of the earth to 1 and mapping every vector of the length d to a certain point A to the vector in the same direction, but of 1/d length, thus pointing to A'.

      For instance the moon is about 50 times the radius of the earth away, so his image would be projected somewhere at 1/50 of the earth's radius, or just 85mls from the center of the earth. You can use other scaling functions but you will always end with a similar discrepancy. If you use 1/sqrt(d), A' will be somewhere at about 700mls from the center of the earth... still far away from everything we reached until now.

      There have been men on the moon, but no one deeper than 8mls from the earth's surface. Basicly we barely have scratched the surface of the earth yet, with even the deepest holes ever drilled lurking somewhere at the 7mls point (don't have the current number right here).

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    4. Re:ah the ocean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, the degree to which we have probed space with light and radio telescopes FAR exceeds that of the world's oceans. A vaccuum allows most forms of energy to travel through it, while water does a great job of attenuating most EM radiation, leaving sound to be the primary method of remote imaging.
      Of course we could never have those beautiful global shaded relief seafloor images if it wasn't for satellite alimetry, so i guess its all related.

    5. Re:ah the ocean by avgjoe62 · · Score: 1
      We really don't have any improvments for reaching really deep areas and are still using technology pioneered in the 70s.

      Let me just tweek that quote abit to get:

      We really don't have any improvments for reaching orbit and are still using technology pioneered in the 70s

      --

      How come Slashdot never gets Slashdotted?

    6. Re:ah the ocean by justforaday · · Score: 1

      interesting that a guy with the name spacerodent and website spaceratspants is more interested in deep ocean exploration than space exploration...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    7. Re:ah the ocean by spacerodent · · Score: 1

      well I'm more intereted in what pays well

    8. Re:ah the ocean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      we know more about the moon's behind than we do the ocean's bottom.

    9. Re:ah the ocean by wulfhound · · Score: 1

      Make that the 40s and 50s...

    10. Re:ah the ocean by Darby · · Score: 5, Funny

      as an ocean engineer I feel compelled to point out that exploring the depths of the ocean is an assload harder than exploring space.

      Yeah, but do you run into problems converting between imperial assloads and metric assloads?

    11. Re:ah the ocean by mikael · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You might want to visit this link and read the article with the quote "Two thirds of the world's surface is covered by water, yet more people have walked on the moon than visited the deepest parts of our oceans.".

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    12. Re:ah the ocean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's kind of like saying you flipped through a dictionary and read it.

      I wouldn't call a telescopic survey much of an exploration. A predecessor to exploration maybe.

    13. Re:ah the ocean by monkeymanatwork · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a space engineer (really, I work for NASA) I feel compelled to point out that exploring space is an assload harder than exploring the ocean. Accordingly, we've explored far less of it than the oceans (as a percentage of total volume). [Space] technologies are stagnating because most of the NASA beauracracy is directed towards making existing technologies less efficient. We (NASA) really don't have any improvements for reaching really deep space areas and are still using technology pioneered in the 60s. So there! Our technology sucks a lot more than yours!

    14. Re:ah the ocean by Forge · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's because it dosn't get harder. Once you have achived orbit it's simply a matter more efficent engines and larger volumes of fuel/life suport consumebles.

      I.e. With a few years suply of food and enogh fuel for the trib the curent space shutles could make a trip to Mars.

      The ocean is diferent. I can go down to 15 feet with no equptment at all. Just a pair of shorts. As you get deaper the requierd equiptment gets more complex. To dive to 200 feet you need 3 air tanks with diferent mixtures.

      I hope you get the point. If not... When we can rutenly explore the deapest part of the ocean the rest can then be dealt with in time.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    15. Re:ah the ocean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel compelled to point out that exploring space is an assload harder than exploring the ocean

      How about a point by point comparison of the two, explaining your argument? I know you have nothing better to do on a Saturday afternoon...

      (and if you actually comply, thanks!)

    16. Re:ah the ocean by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Accordingly, we've explored far less of it than the oceans (as a percentage of total volume)

      Thank you for that. Space is rather huge, so I don't think it is a fair comparison. And looking at indirect exploration we do know alot more about space than our own oceans.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    17. Re:ah the ocean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      In yet another different approach I defined a measure in our space with a unique singularity located in my bathroom, normalized so that measure of my toilet is equal to the measure of the rest of the Universe. According to this approach, we need trillions of dollars to adequately research just the draining system. My ass barely scratched this infinite volume of unknown.

    18. Re:ah the ocean by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think his/her point is that

      (anything)/(finite number) > (anything)/(infinity)

      Thus the percentage of ocean explored will always be higher than space explored, even when we've explored the entirety of our galaxy.

      --
      -Styopa
    19. Re:ah the ocean by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Funny

      space shutles could make a trip to Mars.
      The ocean is diferent. I can go down to 15 feet with no equptment at all. Just a pair of shorts.


      Pffft! I can do it whithout shorts! ;-)

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    20. Re:ah the ocean by MemoryAid · · Score: 1

      I have only made it to half that depth without shorts. Kudos to you.

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    21. Re:ah the ocean by anonymous+cowherd+(m · · Score: 1

      ...still using technology pioneered in the 60s. Oh really? I didn't know Goddard invented the liquid-fueled rocket in the 60's. :) Great trick, too, considering he died in 1945.

      --
      http://neokosmos.blogsome.com
  6. The Mirror Ocean from "Megalodon" by Mad+Man · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bring on the "Jurassic Park" references."


    More like this year's straight-to-video shark movie Megalodon :


    Oil...the quest for it is unrelenting. The search for new reserves of the 'black gold' never-ends and leading the search is Nexecon Petroleum and its flagship-the largest drilling and refining platform ever constructed-'Colossus" located in the freezing North Atlantic waters off the coast of Greenland.

    'Colossus' will drill deeper than any rig ever has, a fact that gratifies Nexecon CEO, Peter Brazier, but that has geologists the world over up in arms, concerned that delicate ocean floor fault lines could be disturbed with catastrophic effects. Skeptical news reporter Christen Giddings and her cameraman Jake Thompson are invited by Braziera to document the safety of 'Colossus.'

    The powerful drill tears through the seabed, striking a rich oil deposit. As the drill penetrates further, it ruptures a fissure that reveals a second 'mirror' ocean that has existed beneath ours for millions of years. An ocean teeming with prehistoric life. As the choking oil posions the water, the frenzied creatures swarm for the surface.

    Colossus buckles under the onslaught. Brazier, Christen, and a team of engineers descend in Colossus' glass elevator to assess the damage and come face to face with the most powerful oceanic predator that ever lived. Carcharodon Megalodon. The giant ancestor of the Great White Shark. This eleven-ton 'killing machine' quickly stakes its territory in the waters surrounding Colossus with disasterous and horrific consequences, destroying and devouring anything in its path.

    Now fate will pull them together as they wager their changes of survival against the most fearsome creature that ever dominated the ocean, and pit the technology and machinery of man against beast. Megalodon...sixty feet of prehistoric terror.

    1. Re:The Mirror Ocean from "Megalodon" by spacerodent · · Score: 1

      i read a shitty book about somthing like that once. And the book was serious heh. While the whole 2nd ocean thing is retarded the idea that very large sea life could go unnoticed isnt that far fetched. Giant squid have yet to be video taped or witnessed except in larve form (when they are near the surface). The adults are 40-60 feet long and we've never found more than the bits and pieces that wash up on shore when they come near the surface to breed. Now imagine something like that which never comes to the surface. We'd never fucking know about it. Theres also that fish we thought was extinct like 20 million years ago then they caught some off africa and california. I'm sure theres lots of crazy shit left to be discovered and probally several speices we think are extict that are still puttering around somewhere.

    2. Re:The Mirror Ocean from "Megalodon" by lewp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, just to be clear, whole (or quite nearly whole) specimens of adult (we think) giant squid have been seen/recovered/studied. We've just never found them alive.

      --
      Game... blouses.
    3. Re:The Mirror Ocean from "Megalodon" by prof_peabody · · Score: 5, Informative

      Giant squid are quite common, perhaps you refer to Colossal Squid? They found a complete one last year, it was all over the news. Plus we keep finding sperm whales with scars from the colossal. They had interesting hooks on their tentacles that no other squid has, so evidence of attcks on whales is easy to identify.

    4. Re:The Mirror Ocean from "Megalodon" by spacerodent · · Score: 2, Interesting

      we found baby "giant" squid last year. They were less than an inch long and you needed a microscope to properly identify them but we found em. The researches tried to keep 6 for study but they all died before they reach land. If a ship full of PhDs can't keep the little bastards alive I'd say theres a lot we don't know about em

    5. Re:The Mirror Ocean from "Megalodon" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If a ship full of PhDs can't keep the little bastards alive

      Give a ship full of PhDs six human babies to look after and I'm not sure any would make shore alive!

    6. Re:The Mirror Ocean from "Megalodon" by MuscaDomestica · · Score: 1

      Actually giant squids are a little smaller then we origonally thought. They are 30 feet long, still big but not monsterous.

      And finding living squids... there have been some new discoveries... :)
      http://www.pref.kyoto.jp/kaiyo/2-topicnews/new s/20 02/02-02-01/mega-squid/mega-squid-01.html

    7. Re:The Mirror Ocean from "Megalodon" by vranash · · Score: 3, Funny

      The PhD's, or the babies? ;p

      -- vranash

    8. Re:The Mirror Ocean from "Megalodon" by chuklz · · Score: 1

      Yes we've captured so many of them. :rolleyes:.

    9. Re:The Mirror Ocean from "Megalodon" by nosferatu-man · · Score: 1

      I saw this: it was the crappiest movie I think I may ever have seen. The graphics were N64 level. But it was still a giant killer shark picture, so ...

      'jfb

      --
      To spur "enterprise Linux," Big Bang, the distributed two-phase commit.
    10. Re:The Mirror Ocean from "Megalodon" by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      that's amazing, I've never seen a 404 before...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:The Mirror Ocean from "Megalodon" by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      Try it without the Slashcode-inserted space in the URL.

      Awesome picture, and more than a bit creepy. Anyone want to translate the text on the page?

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
    12. Re:The Mirror Ocean from "Megalodon" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because you'd have to set up the babies in different conditions from the start to optimise the protocol.

      And if any do survive to shore, we'd have to turn around and head straight back out with another 6 babies, just so we could perform the experiment in triplicate :)

  7. pandora's box? by Garion+Maki · · Score: 5, Interesting

    considering that that pool is completely sealed from the outside world would mean that anything in it isn't resistant to infections from the outside world or the other way around...

    so couldent it be that once humans put a crack in that icy shield that protects the pool, that some human deseases, to which humans have already build a resistance, that these deseases infect the ancient inhabitants of that pool, creating a slaughter among them... or the other way around...

    so... altho the stuff they'll find can prove valuble to science, I would aproach with caution if I was them...

    --
    All indicators show that the human race is selectively breeding itself for stupidity.
    1. Re:pandora's box? by Gilgaron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is more likely you'd transfer fish or invertebrate pathogens than human pathogens.

      Most microorganisms have a fairly narrow band of temperatures at which they can grow. The S. aureus on your skin will not like growing in artic temperatures and a psychrophile living in the arctic will probably not like living on your skin much, either.

      Now, with fish from just outside this region and fish inside this region your concerns could be more valid, since they would be under similar environmental conditions and have different immunities.

    2. Re:pandora's box? by Sique · · Score: 3, Insightful

      On the other hand: All parasites, virii and bacteria in this pool are completely adapted to the lifeforms in this pool for millions of years and thus probably completely unable to cope with lifefroms from the outside. Ergo: No infection, because of far reaching incompatibility.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    3. Re:pandora's box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not likely such a thing would happen, basically because diseases of other species don't tend to have the neccesary features. This is because diseases tend to fully orientate on infecting there current specie as effectively as possible. There alot of species tend to have there own specific special defense variations, a disease specialised on species a can't get to b cause it's failure rate is 100%.

      So how do you sometimes get diseases from other species sometimes then? Oftently either A. due to it by chance crossing with a human disease strain and thus getting the infectious specialisations it needs (usually the virus needs some compatibility withhumans still with this though, cause otherwise it won't get a chance in the human body to do so). I believe SARS is an example of this, note that it started up being sub optimal but from each new infection became more effective. In other words getting rid of cruft from the fusion of both virus strains to remain with only that what it really needs.

      The other option B. is when two species are faily closely related, so some primate diseases can jump over to human forinstance, AIDS is though to have come from this direction perhaps. Some primates species in any case seem to have a special gene variation that makes them immune to it.

      So what this basically comes down to, is that it would be very strange indeed if some anchient lifeform which is already highly unrelated with humans could have anything that could infect us.

      Quickshot

    4. Re:pandora's box? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, any neanderthals holding their breath down there are screwed.

    5. Re:pandora's box? by C32 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, it'll be exactly like that time a human got a virus from a fish.. Oh Wait.. That never happened.
      Moron.

    6. Re:pandora's box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yet we do get them from birds, other primates, cattle etc. etc. so why should fish be that different? Moron.

    7. Re:pandora's box? by jeff+munkyfaces · · Score: 1
      the pool is not "completely sealed from the outside world"

      from the article:

      "The basin is shielded from the influence of the North Atlantic by the narrow Fram Strait between Greenland and Svalbard, and by the Lomonosov Ridge, which rises close to the surface."

      the point is that some of the stuff in there never goes into shallower water, and as it is a "basin" there is no-where else for it to go.

      i don't think contamination will be too much of an issue.

      You are probably getting confused with lake vostok (or similar), which really is completely sealed.

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2000/vostok _transcript.shtml

    8. Re:pandora's box? by RebelWebmaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      The plural form of virus is "viruses", not virii. Unless you're a 1337 hax0r, of course.

    9. Re:pandora's box? by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      S. Aureus? What the? Ohmy-fricken-Ghod! They're all over me! Geddum-off! Aaaaaaaaaaaauuuuuuuuugggggggghhhh!

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    10. Re:pandora's box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I re-read both articles and I don't think it is completely isolated from everything else.

      They are talking about a section of the ocean within a deep gully on the ocean floor - isolated perhaps by thermal differences, and with icce on the top of the surface, but still with flowing currents.

      I quote: One area they will focus on is the Canada Basin, a huge and largely unknown submarine hole 3,800m (12,500ft) deep. Covered by ice, it lies immediately north of the Yukon Territory and Alaska, and is linked to the Pacific through the Bering Strait, a mere 70m (230ft) deep. The basin is shielded from the influence of the North Atlantic by the narrow Fram Strait between Greenland and Svalbard, and by the Lomonosov Ridge, which rises close to the surface.

      Notice how they say it is linked to the Pacific? Sounds like it isn't an isolated section of ocean. It is just a thermally isolated, dense layer of water. I would suggest any investigations wouldn't contaminate it any more than normal ocean current flows do.

  8. Cover Your Nose by SEWilco · · Score: 1
    a vast, still pool unstirred for millennia, walled by steep ridges and lidded with ice

    Who put the word "living" in there?
    That sounds more like a deep, lidded, watery grave.
    There won't be photosynthesis nor water circulation to supply oxygen. There will only be something alive if there is a geologic heat source.

    1. Re:Cover Your Nose by vijaya_chandra · · Score: 1

      You can definitely not rule the chance of some unknown volcano or thermal source down there, inspite of the ice over the surface

      Who knows, may be some organisms are out there surviving on the very little heat from the earth's core (that's a little too imaginative but you can't say it's impossible)

      Check this out for Life in extreme environments

    2. Re:Cover Your Nose by SEWilco · · Score: 2, Informative
      I mentioned a geothermal energy source, so I'm not ruling it out. But it's quite a leap to get from the known extremophile bacteria and geothermal vent ecology to something which could be oxygenating the water for ancient creatures.

      Particularly awkward are the millions of elapsed years, during which geothermal heat might have shut off or wandered away.

  9. "Its a Unix system.. by Cyno01 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I know this!" Oh, other Jurassic Park references?

    (and before anyone replies, i know that the 3d file manager for irix actually does exist...)

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:"Its a Unix system.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Oh, sure -- it's all 'ooh' and 'ah' now. Then comes the running and the screaming."

      muay glaven.

  10. Jurrassic Park? by ellem · · Score: 2, Funny

    How about Mountains Of Madness? Cthulhu awaits!

    See?

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
    1. Re:Jurrassic Park? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You fail your course in eldritch lore at Arkham University.
      The mountains of madness are in antarctica, and was home to Shoggoths (and the strange unnamed creatures which created them, and against which the Shoggoths rebelled).
      Cthulhu, however, lies resting in R'lyeth, which is also somewhere on the southern part of the globe, so no risk of waking him with this little project.

    2. Re:Jurrassic Park? by templeofdagon · · Score: 1

      Cthulhu? He lives in R'lyeh..

      The Yithians lived in the mountains of madness!

    3. Re:Jurrassic Park? by ellem · · Score: 1

      OMG. You don't still believe in the North and South Pole do you? Lemme guess the Earth is an orb and rotates around the "sun" in an "orbit".

      Good grief has The Bible taught you nothing?

      --
      This .sig is fake but accurate.
  11. Link to a previous expedition by Internet+Ninja · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Canada Basin has already been checked out in a mission in 2002 which you can read about here. I guess this time round it's so they can have a jolly good look. I wonder if they'll find any aluminium cans or plastic bags at the bottom :)

    As one reader pointed out, exploring the deep ocean is harder than space. I guess that's why they felt compelled to put a flag at the bottom. :)

    1. Re:Link to a previous expedition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (flags) - if you look closely there is a Canadian flag at the top...

    2. Re:Link to a previous expedition by FunkySquid · · Score: 1

      If you read the caption, you'll see that there are also Chinese and Japanese flags as well.

  12. This May Hurt A Bit by SEWilco · · Score: 4, Funny

    Remove the icy lid with a nuclear bomb.
    Sometimes the world needs Godzilla.

  13. Living fossils by niktesla · · Score: 5, Informative
    This is the world's refrigerator where change has happened far more slowly than in other oceans

    If its anything like my fridge, they'll find new life alright! But seriously, I think its funny how many "living fossils" were discovered by accident. Examples: ratfish, coelacanth, wollemi pine, etc.

    --
    I've discovered a remarkable proof, but this margin is too small to contain it...
    1. Re:Living fossils by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You forgot to mention Cher

  14. Bring on the "Jurassic Park" references... by Xetrov · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Bring on the "Jurassic Park" references.

    Its a UNIX system! I know this!!!

    Thats all I remember from Jurassic Park, and I am not sure how it applies...

  15. Practicle joke by wazzzup · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wish I could play a good practical joke on these guys a la the Dino the Dinosaur placed in front of a webcam at some New Zealand volcano.

    Perhaps a printout from Outlook conspicously placed on the ocean floor that reads "J3llyF1sh, Squ1d - 1ncr3ase your t3ntacle s1ze by at l3ast one f0ot."

  16. obviously by ch-chuck · · Score: 0, Troll

    this 300 million year old climate change could only have come from Halliburton's secret time machine, designed Dick Cheney for vast personal profit. All those species wiped out by corporate greed.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  17. Physics student by Councilor+Hart · · Score: 1

    Hello, I am a physics student. Astronomy is a hobby, and fusion is something I want to make a living in for at least a few years.
    The last few weeks/months however it has occurred to me that most people tend to focus on how to get into space. While most deep waters are uncharted(?) or at least unexplored.
    Most likely I am just plain ignorant about the oceans and a lot is know.
    Perhaps you can point to me to some interesting sites/books/papers or the like. I am more interested in the physics than the engineering though.
    I am not sure where I want to go with this post. Then again two years ago I hardly knew about the existence of a tokamak. So I guess it's just a quest for some info for a quick look around in the field.
    I am curious.

    1. Re:Physics student by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't know exactly what kind of references you're interested in, but as a marine geophysicist (and former physics student), i'd suggest you google for a few related topics:

      hi-resolution mulitchannel seismic stratigraphy-imaging not just the seafloor, but up to kilometers of sediment and rock below it

      multibeam swath bathymetry-the physics in beam forming is amazing

  18. This Sounds Suspiciously... by Greyfox · · Score: 0, Troll

    Like the plotline to Alien vs. Predator... No don't go! It's a trap!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:This Sounds Suspiciously... by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      And you just had to bring Admiral Akbar into it, didn't you?

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
  19. forget jurassic park by bigattichouse · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think Cthulhu references are more appropriate.

    --
    meh
    1. Re:forget jurassic park by Spudley · · Score: 1

      I was thinking Godzilla or The Abyss.

      --
      (Spudley Strikes Again!)
    2. Re:forget jurassic park by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      I was actually thinking of Dagon

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    3. Re:forget jurassic park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was trying _not_ to think of Dagon. But...thanks to you... I hear the call. I realise now, gazing upon the play of evening light upon glistening scales, that the forms of my new friends in Innsmouth are beautiful, not misshapen terrors. Now to spring Cousin Bert from the Asylum...

    4. Re:forget jurassic park by DreadCthulhu · · Score: 1

      Yes, they are much, much more appropriate.

  20. I am waiting for by vijaya_chandra · · Score: 1

    my great^10000 (or place a googol here) grand father's body to be finally uncovered

    1. Re:I am waiting for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      my great^10000 (or place a googol here) grand father's body to be finally uncovered
      You probably burned it in your gas tank on your way to work yesterday.
  21. not offtopic, haven't any of you seen by 512k · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --
    ------ Work is so much easier when you don't
  22. Arctic climate change by dankelley · · Score: 4, Interesting
    One of the big worries about the Arctic is climate change. Much of the ecosystem relies on the presence of ice, and this ice seems to be disappearing. See fig 16.3 of the IPCC report for a timeseries going back 100 years. In the past few decades we have had adequate measurements of wate temperature in the Actic, and it appears to be rising; see the diagrams in a recent essay at the NOAA site, for example.

    As ice changes, so does the ecosystem. Polar bears cannot walk on water, for example.

    There are also global consequence of Arctic change that worry climate scientists. For one thing, there is a nonlinear feedback loop since ice has a high albedo. Thus, ice reflects solar radiation back to space, which keeps the system cool. But water has a much lower albedo than ice. This yields a nonlinear feedback loop. Melting ice creates open water, which absorbs more heat, which melts more ice. There was a time when USSR scientists suggested we could open up a northwest passage through the Arctic simply by painting the ice black, setting this feedback loop into action. Of course, if the ice melts, navigation will be easier through the Arctic. Traffic may avoid Panama and go through a more direct route. Part of this traffic could be oil tankers, which can run aground, causing great damage to a system already damaged by the climate change.

    1. Re:Arctic climate change by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As ice changes, so does the ecosystem. Polar bears cannot walk on water, for example.

      No, they swim so well that some scientist classify them as marine animals...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:Arctic climate change by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

      the smart ones would migrate south to solid land and change to meet the climate changes.(over time that is)

      nature survives, it always will, if we fuck it up, it will change to remedy the inbalance, the fear isnt losing nature or destroying the earth, it's the matter of nature destroying us to make the balance right again.
      We lose tons of species every day, either ones we dont know about and some we do, it's called natural selection, if one species isnt able to survive and adapt to change, manmade or nature made, nature remedies this.

    3. Re:Arctic climate change by FlyingOrca · · Score: 2, Informative

      True enough, but they don't *hunt* in open water. Less ice == less bears; you can see it happening in my old stomping grounds of Hudson Bay, where decreased ice cover is marginalizing the bear population.

      (My folks are retired arctic zoologists, I grew up in the Canadian arctic, and the climate change scenarios aren't pretty. Not so coincidentally, their last expedition was SHEBA/JOIS, the first international scientific expedition to use the Louis St. Laurent as a platform.)

      --
      Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.
    4. Re:Arctic climate change by core+plexus · · Score: 1
      Oil has been leaking into Arctic waters off the North Slope of Alaska for many thousands of years. It's how the North Slope oil deposits were discovered. The same situation has existed in many other places.

      As for climate change, it is inevitable. There are fossils of large reptiles in Arctic Alaska, and evidence of vast, tropical forests in other parts of Alaska. Many of these were buried under thousands of feet of ice until recently (~9,000 years ago).

      And polar bears spend time on land during the summer, and they can swim for many, many miles. They are very comfortable on the ocean, and are very well adapted to it.

      -cp-

    5. Re:Arctic climate change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The polar bears' primary source of food are ringed seals that live and breed on the ice pack. If the ice pack disappears, so does their source of food. Polar bears barely eat during the summer months since there's so little to eat in the arctic region. Many are going hungry now and are having fewer cubs due to the shrinking pack ice.

      LATimes Story

  23. Oh.... by GrassMunk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So they found where our parliment goes for their summer break

  24. 30 million year old germ by vijaya_chandra · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can check this for info about some bacteria that survive in vacuum and some bacteria that have actually been declared "living" after 30 million years

    The article says about spores,
    "In terms of our computer analogy, a bacterial spore is like a handheld calculator that has repackaged itself into its original protective shipping carton and turned itself off."

    I would love to have one such calculator

    1. Re:30 million year old germ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd rather have a calculator that stays unpackaged and turned on so I can, you know, use it.

  25. the deep is full of some strange stuff by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Informative

    here are some pages pictures taken from norfanz, the last major survey of deep aquatic life

    as reported here of course

    those are some weird looking animals

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  26. hmm by Raagshinnah · · Score: 4, Funny
    "a vast, still pool unstirred for millennia, walled by steep ridges and lidded with ice."

    You mean quebec?

  27. Re:There is nothing down there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just because its a closed system doesn't mean that there is no oxygen or no life. for all real purposes, the Earth is a closed system too.

  28. link.. by jeff+munkyfaces · · Score: 1
    1. Re:link.. by Peaceful_Patriot · · Score: 1

      Interesting article! Thanks for the link.

      --
      There is nothing so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
  29. Re:There is nothing down there by prof_peabody · · Score: 2, Insightful

    step out from under your rock. There has been a substantial amount of literature published on seep and vent communities at depths of over 4000 m. There are patches with lots going on. Don't get me started on Archaea.

  30. Re:There is nothing down there by bugmenot · · Score: 1

    Yes, but only if it was much . This tiny closed system could not possibly support an entire ecosystem. It's all vaporware to get more research funds.

    --
    This account has been seized by the GNAA. That is all.
  31. Re:Screw Jurassic Park... by hostyle · · Score: 0

    Don't be worried. Whats the worst that could happen?

    --
    Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
  32. Re:There is nothing down there by bugmenot · · Score: 0

    Seep and vent communities are not sealed off from the outside world by a thick layer of ice. These systems receive nutrients that fall off from the surface and heat and minerals from the volcanic vents. This area that was found has none of the basic requirements for life to exist.

    --
    This account has been seized by the GNAA. That is all.
  33. Re:There is nothing down there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    when the primary producers could be chemoautotrophic bacteria (which are microscopic and require no light), the size of this pond appears much larger. I'd be VERY supprised if they do not find life down there.

  34. Re:There is nothing down there by prof_peabody · · Score: 1

    Since you are mixing up seep and vent I don't think I will bother arguing with your ignorance. Seep communities form at hydrocarbon seeps, which are plentiful thanks to methane hydrates (clathrates) which are ubiquitous in deep water. I find it hard to believe that vents which have been observed in almost every deep water setting will not be found here. And no seeps aren't always on top of hydrocarbon basins. Do a little reading in some journals before you replay thanks.

  35. Re:There is nothing down there by noselasd · · Score: 1

    So the lifeforms we already know that don't need oxygen nor sunlight doesn't really exist ?

  36. Coming Soon - Another Starbucks! by Ryosen · · Score: 1

    >> "world's oldest sea water -- a vast, still pool unstirred for millennia, walled by steep ridges and lidded with ice."

    Until we came along and screwed up yet another ecosystem beyond repair. Can't we just leave shit alone?

    --

    Ryosen
    One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
  37. uhh WRONG by spacerodent · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    you sir are an uneducated idiot. They've found assloads of life both complex and single cellular around geothermal vents far below any sunlight or oxygen. Watch some discovery channel for christs sake.

    1. Re:uhh WRONG by bugmenot · · Score: 0

      I apologize if I offended your clearly superior education obtained through the discovery channel. RTFA, there is no eveidence of any geothermal vents down there, just icy cold water sealed off by an ice layer.

      --
      This account has been seized by the GNAA. That is all.
  38. Familier? by Bandman · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think I saw an X Files about this...

    it didn't end well.

    On the other hand, I'd like a miniature pet trilobyte...

    1. Re:Familier? by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      There was also a movie about this. It didn't end that well either.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    2. Re:Familier? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't if you ever played Ecco the Dolphin - trilobytes are deadly!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  39. "Millenia" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not nearly old enough to find anything interesting.

  40. Re:There is nothing down there by bugmenot · · Score: 0

    Time will tell who is the ignorant person here...
    BTW I have some Martian bacteria samples for sale if you are interested in it...

    --
    This account has been seized by the GNAA. That is all.
  41. Re:Polar bears cannot walk on water... by FFFish · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...Christ!

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  42. Wasn't that kinda redundant? by aussie_a · · Score: 1

    His Score already said he was redundant, I'm sure you didn't need to make a post saying as much.

  43. Fish and Chips anyone? by wasudeo · · Score: 1

    300 million years? Might be a little stale...

  44. Beer companies will be all over this by bugmenot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Imagine using this thousand of years old water to make the perfect brew. Take that stuff made with Rocky mountains water elsewhere Coors, we've got pre-historic water in our frosty beverages!

    --
    This account has been seized by the GNAA. That is all.
    1. Re:Beer companies will be all over this by petsounds · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, you can already drink water that old. Trinity Water is taken from a 2.2 mile deep spring under Idaho. It's been carbon-dated at over 16,000 years old and is basically as pure as it was then due to the granite formation protecting the source below from groundwater contamination. Best water I've had..something about the unique mineral content.

    2. Re:Beer companies will be all over this by core+plexus · · Score: 1
      "world's oldest sea water " (emphasis added). Trust me, you do not want to drink sea water, not much anyway.

      Try glacier ice (including icebergs) instead.

      -cp-

      Fish Looks Like Giant Sea Monster

  45. unit conversion please by nounderscores · · Score: 1

    How many Assloads are there in a Library of Congress?

    1. Re:unit conversion please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Is that an African or a European assload?"

    2. Re:unit conversion please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's in metric units, stupid!

    3. Re:unit conversion please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on how many Florida retirement home tours end up there instead of Reno.

  46. Inconceivable! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer the Cliffs of Insanity myself.

  47. Jurassic Park? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new aquatic velociraptor overlords.

  48. Alert Dr. Jackson!! by Maverick2219 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe THAT is where Atlantis is!

    --
    I try to make everyone's day a little more surreal.
    1. Re:Alert Dr. Jackson!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to give anything away, but judging from the title of the new series, I'm guessing they may have found it...

  49. Re:There is nothing down there by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

    Well, it sure is a good thing all them fancy-pants scientists with their crazy ideas and book-learnin have you around to set them straight!

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  50. Re:Offtopic: Plural of 'virus' by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

    "Virus" itself, in the modern sense, is a made-up word -- or did you think Caesar and Octavian talked about smallpox vaccination?

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  51. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  52. Re:Offtopic: Plural of 'virus' by Sique · · Score: 1

    Not really. Only the association with a small nearly-lifeform is new. "virus" itself just means "slime" or "poison" in the old Latin.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  53. Re:Offtopic: Plural of 'virus' by Power+Everywhere · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You're wrong.

    With bonus, the plural was boni. Well, there were a lot of plural forms... boni, bonorum, bonis, bonos. So I don't know what you're talking about it having but one plural form identical to its singular. There are many words similar to what you describe in Latin, but bonus is not one of them.

    I also don't know about the other words, since I'm too busy to get my old Latin dictionary out, but I'd wager to bet that they get declined in either the second or fourth declensions and have multiple plural endings (though I will give you that the plural nominative of fourth declension masculine and feminine forms are indentical, maybe this is what you're thinking of?)

    Oh, and if a word is assimilited into a new lnaguage, the plural of that new language is far and away apporporiate for usage with the new word, especially when there is already a class of native nouns that function similarly when pluralizing but have entirely different endings -- the likelihood that the non-native nouns will ever form their own class in the new system is nil. Use some common sense.

  54. No, not Jurassic Park by Fortran+IV · · Score: 1

    Actually, my first thought was of something about 80 years before Crichton's Jurassic Park and The Lost World: Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's novel The Lost World, in which he introduced Professor Challenger. Dinosaurs, action, adventure, and a good bit of humor--from a master storyteller. Worth digging up, if you're not too anal about the science (which was really pretty good for its day).

    --
    I figure by 2030 or so my 6-digit UID will be something to brag about.
    1. Re:No, not Jurassic Park by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      It's been done even sooner, at least on the beach. ...."The Arctic nights have seen some queer sights,
      But the queerest they ever did see,
      was that night on the marge of Lake Labarge,
      When I cremated Sam Mcgee."

      (Robert Service)

  55. Jurrasic Park? by way2trivial · · Score: 1
    I'm thinking more about 'day after' references.. they're gonna drill the ice shelf right?

    and a big chunk is going to fall off?

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  56. Not "Jurassic Park" by Cthulhu by wintermute42 · · Score: 2

    "world's oldest sea water -- a vast, still pool unstirred for millennia, walled by steep ridges and lidded with ice." Bring on the "Jurassic Park" references."

    For those of us who have studied that dread work, the Necronomicon, the truth is not Jurassic Part but the the Elder Gods. Yes, my slashdot fellow readers, what will be found are those who were here before us. Trapped for millions of years behind the walls of ice will be found those who came from beyond. Behind the icy barriers they have waited, only now to be awakened. We can at least take heart in the fact that this is the northern polar climbs. If it were the cold icy regions of the south pole (where the Mountains of Maddness lie), those released elder Gods would come forth to gorge on penguins. The horror! The rejoicing in Redmond! None of us can question which operating system Cthulhu would use! At least we are spared this fate.

    1. Re:Not "Jurassic Park" by Cthulhu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf

    2. Re:Not "Jurassic Park" by Cthulhu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hmm...as strange as the parent post is, I must point out that here in Slashdot-land, the Necromicon you refer to can only truly describe the Book of the Dead of Evil Dead Series fame.

      Thus, we need only fear Deadites, and other related Candorian demons. No Elder Gods here.

      And certainly not down in that part of the ocean.

    3. Re:Not "Jurassic Park" by Cthulhu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're fucking gay. In your entire life time, you will never so much as speak with a female of your race.

      Kthx, die.

  57. Re:There is nothing down there by Peaceful_Patriot · · Score: 3, Informative

    That was the popular belief before they found entire thriving ecosystems living thousands of feet deep, deriving their energy from geothermal vents in the sea floor. No light, little or no oxygen, and yet these creatures get all they need from the chemical soup pouring from these vents.

    I am not suggesting there are vents in this area, just that nature can surprise us.

    "Life will find a way."

    --
    There is nothing so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
  58. They will find death. by GISGEOLOGYGEEK · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They won't find great new ecologies full of living fossils.

    They will find the remains of those ecologies, that have died in only the last 50 -60 years ... poisoned from the massive dumping of radioactive waste into the Arctic Ocean basin by the former Soviet Union.

    --
    George Bush + Linux = "I will not let information get in the way of the fight against Windows"
    1. Re:They will find death. by igny · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Radioactive waste is not poisonous, it is mutagenic.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    2. Re:They will find death. by Dolohov · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ever heard of radiation poisoning?

      Besides, several nuclear fuel materials are poisonous in their own right.

    3. Re:They will find death. by GISGEOLOGYGEEK · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Try heavy metal poisoning.

      I'm not trying to say you are wrong, i would just like you to try heavy metal poisoning. It would suit you. Symptoms of heavy metal poisoning would definately explain how you could make such a dumbass response to my post.

      --
      George Bush + Linux = "I will not let information get in the way of the fight against Windows"
    4. Re:They will find death. by GISGEOLOGYGEEK · · Score: 0, Troll

      Ok dumbasses!

      How exactly is it Trolling, when I pointed out that there has been a huge amount of ecological destruction due to the bastards that ran the nuclear energy program of the former soviet union?

      huh? huh? how is that trolling!

      dumbasses!

      --
      George Bush + Linux = "I will not let information get in the way of the fight against Windows"
    5. Re:They will find death. by GISGEOLOGYGEEK · · Score: 1

      Since when is posting that the respondant missed the damn obvious example of poisoning by Heavy Metals to be called 'flamebait' .... when he claimed that radioactive waste isn't poisonous?

      Damn someone around here had his slurpee straw in the mercury jar too long!

      --
      George Bush + Linux = "I will not let information get in the way of the fight against Windows"
  59. Plural of 'virus': VIRUSES by nosferatu-man · · Score: 1

    Wrong. The plural of "virus" is "viruses". English word: English plural.

    'jfb

    --
    To spur "enterprise Linux," Big Bang, the distributed two-phase commit.
  60. Gulag Ice Lens by handy_vandal · · Score: 1
    From the preface to The Gulag Archipelago by Aleksandr Solzhensitsyn:
    "In 1949 some friends and I came upon a noteworthy news item in Nature, a magazine of the Academy of Sciences. It reported in tiny type that in the course of excavations on the Kolyma River a subterranean ice lens had been discovered which was actually a frozen stream -- and in it were found frozen specimens of prehistoric fauna some tens of thousands of years old. Whether fish or salamander, these were preserved in so fresh a state, the scientific correspondent reported, that those present immediately broke open the ice encasing the specimens and devoured them with relish on the spot."
    Links
    --
    -kgj
  61. Leave shit alone? by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    Until we came along and screwed up yet another ecosystem beyond repair. Can't we just leave shit alone?

    No. No, we can't.

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
  62. The Colossal Squid? A re-branding exercise? by garyok · · Score: 1
    What gets me is that the biologists and taxonomists and other assorted animal philatelists discovered unmolested remains of a new type of super-sized squid and they thought to themselves "Hmmm... we need to give this big sucker a name, one that will fire the public's imagination 'cos calling it Mesonychoteuthis hamiltoni, well, it sucks. Got it! The Colossal squid!"

    What about KRAKEN? It's what other humans have been calling the big suckers for about 2.5 centuries now. Biologists renaming the creature (and poorly too) is nothing but arrogance. It's like other human beings without PhDs couldn't spot a new species. You can just imagine any poor sailor that'd actually seen one of these deep-sea puppies at the dockside trying to explain to a nimrod labcoat "No! No! I keep telling you: it wasn't a giant squid - it was a MOTHER-FUCKING ENORMOUS FUCKING MONSTER squid!"

    Anyway, poetry to add a breath of life into your stale, sterile, buttoned-down, airbag-cushioned existences:

    Below the thunders of the upper deep;
    Far far beneath in the abysmal sea,
    His ancient, dreamless, uninvaded sleep
    The Kraken sleepeth: faintest sunlights flee
    About his shadowy sides; above him swell
    Huge sponges of millennial growth and height;
    And far away into the sickly light,
    From many a wondrous grot and secret cell
    Unnumber'd and enormous polypi
    Winnow with giant arms the slumbering green.
    There hath he lain for ages, and will lie
    Battening upon huge seaworms in his sleep,
    Until the latter fire shall heat the deep;
    Then once by man and angels to be seen,
    In roaring he shall rise and on the surface die.

    The Kraken by Alfred, Lord Tennyson

    Yeah, that's right: Kraken's got better poets working for him than that big insaniac douche-bag Cthulhu.

    --
    One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors - Plato
    1. Re:The Colossal Squid? A re-branding exercise? by rhuntley12 · · Score: 1

      Pfft, the Kraken is no more. It was destroyed long long ago on one late light session of Final Fantasy.

    2. Re:The Colossal Squid? A re-branding exercise? by drunkenbatman · · Score: 1

      Um, perhaps it had more to do with the idea that the giant squid is pervasively thought to be what the kraken was based upon worldwide, but now they're found something bigger... so calling it a giant squid doesn't seem right, and calling it a kraken, well, everyone knows a kraken is a giant squid...

  63. Re:Offtopic: Plural of 'virus' by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

    "With bonus, the plural was boni. Well, there were a lot of plural forms... boni, bonorum, bonis, bonos."

    Ok Mr Latin Expert, wheres "boner"?

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  64. Off topic, but curious by Fortran+IV · · Score: 1

    Back in the 80's I worked on the Honeywell CP-6 operating system. This was pre-GUI, of course. Across CP-6, you typed "help " at program prompts to get info (just like MS-DOS now). I forget what system program you had to be in, but if you typed "help sam" at the right spot, you got the complete text of "The Cremation of Sam McGee", the earliest "easter egg" I ever saw.

    --
    I figure by 2030 or so my 6-digit UID will be something to brag about.
  65. Re:There is nothing down there by dargon · · Score: 1

    You may want to do a little research into undersee volcanic vents. Until a few years ago (less than 15) we thought the areas around them were simply too toxic to support any form of life, especially since the water can be superheated to 500+ degrees fahrenheit. The scientists of the time were proven wrong. There are organisms on this planet that don't need light, there are organisms that don't need oxygen, and there are almost certainly organisms that need neither (I just can't think of any off the top of my head). Don't be so close minded. Given to age of the area it wouldn't surprise me in the least if they found some pretty amazing things they we've thought to be extinct, even if it's just a Coelacanth which we now know isn't extinct.

  66. Reminds me of the old George Carlin rant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "'Save the planet! Save the planet!' Bullshit!

    The planet is fine.

    The people are fucked!"

    1. Re:Reminds me of the old George Carlin rant... by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

      I have that one too, that fucking rocked.

  67. Of course, everyone knows that... by KC7GR · · Score: 2, Funny

    Trilobytes were the equivalent of our modern bytes in the Atlantean Computer Network. Each trilobyte represented three bits, based on an ancient logic system of 'Yes,' 'No,' and 'Maybe.'

    Hey, we had to get the idea of 'fuzzy logic' from somewhere! ;-)

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  68. Lost World? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here's what they found...
    http://silentmoviemonsters.tripod.com/Th eLostWorld /images/lwtv3.jpg
    http://www.thelostworldonline.2 50x.com/pics/veroni ca/veron1.jpg
    http://www.solitaryphoenix.com/LWAl lorNothing13.jp g

  69. Re:There is nothing down there by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny
    Without oxygen or light no living creatures could survive.
    Clearly you think that anaerobic means someone who doesn't like exercise.
    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  70. Re:Offtopic: Plural of 'virus' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut the fuck up; it's evident you're a novice in this field. Go contract a few viruses and die.

  71. A more apt comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Walking through forests of palm tree apartments ---
    Scoff at the monkeys who live in their dark tents
    Down by the waterhole --- drunk every friday ---
    Eating their nuts --- saving their raisins for sunday.
    Lions and tigers who wait in the shadows ---
    They're fast but they're lazy, and sleep in green meadows.
    Let's bungle in the jungle --- well, that's all right by me.
    I'm a tiger when I want love,
    But I'm a snake if we disagree.