It does work across multiple platforms. The problem (for me) is that it uses Verdana, which is broken w.r.t. Unicode combining accents. It's so bad I just remove Verdana from my Linux machines (I do install MS corefonts).
This is bollocks. You don't license anything. You can't license stuff without agreeing to a specific written license. Can you show me one printed on a CD cover? Thought so. You are buying a copy, pure and simple.
Them are smart, them pesky Google engineers. Trying to actually put to good use heaploads of data they have on you. For instance, if you constantly search for Japanese restaurants, Google might populate your T9 dictionary with words like wasabi and okonomiyaki, just in case. And if they know where you are, they might throw in names of local sushi bars.
How could I change terms? A license, roughly speaking, is a conditional promise not to sue. I can't take away the original promise, because it was not me who has made it. Nor can I sue you, because the copyright is not mine. But if I create a derivative work based on some BSD-licensed code, I can add my own promise not to sue you over use of the derivative, with different conditions. The original code that is a part of the derivative continues to be licensed under its original BSD license. (There's nothing wrong with a whole and a part having different copyright holders and a different licenses.)
Did it have sticky windows or desktop pagers? Because, you know, the patent in question covers sticky windows and desktop pagers. Not multiple desktops themselves.
You don't change the license terms of the code you're based upon, you release a new work under a new license. The original code remains under its original license, you can't take that away.
Slashdot Mirror
you're confising them with the Danes methinks.
It does work across multiple platforms. The problem (for me) is that it uses Verdana, which is broken w.r.t. Unicode combining accents. It's so bad I just remove Verdana from my Linux machines (I do install MS corefonts).
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22As+a+record+store+owner,+My+business+faces+ruin%22&num=100&hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=com.ubuntu:en-US:official&hs=hic&filter=0
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=6241&package_id=112520
You don't know what a "put option" is, do you? Look it up then.
Why, you can try and run the stuff in a VM. Not sure it will work though. Some DRMed software refuse to run in a VirtualBox.
That's a feature, not a bug.
This is bollocks. You don't license anything. You can't license stuff without agreeing to a specific written license. Can you show me one printed on a CD cover? Thought so. You are buying a copy, pure and simple.
IR mirrors are usually gold-plated, so...
Did she ate her victims?
Yeah. For all values of "now" in this millennium.
both this one and the parent. posted by mistake, sorry.
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22146863-23109,00.html
are we satisfied yet?
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22146863-23109,00.html
are we satisfied yet?
No, "K" is not defined to be 1000. "k" is.
"irregardless" is not standard either.
Many high-end "standalone" SACD players have encrypted firewire outputs. Capture it (easy) and crack it (not so easy).
SACD is not cracked. Not that anyone is interested.
Them are smart, them pesky Google engineers. Trying to actually put to good use heaploads of data they have on you. For instance, if you constantly search for Japanese restaurants, Google might populate your T9 dictionary with words like wasabi and okonomiyaki, just in case. And if they know where you are, they might throw in names of local sushi bars.
However, this is not "case in point" by any stretch of imagination.
How could I change terms? A license, roughly speaking, is a conditional promise not to sue. I can't take away the original promise, because it was not me who has made it. Nor can I sue you, because the copyright is not mine. But if I create a derivative work based on some BSD-licensed code, I can add my own promise not to sue you over use of the derivative, with different conditions. The original code that is a part of the derivative continues to be licensed under its original BSD license. (There's nothing wrong with a whole and a part having different copyright holders and a different licenses.)
Did it have sticky windows or desktop pagers? Because, you know, the patent in question covers sticky windows and desktop pagers. Not multiple desktops themselves.
with so-called "powertoys". Third-party add-ons existed long before.
Except this shit is not about virtual consoles at all.
You don't change the license terms of the code you're based upon, you release a new work under a new license. The original code remains under its original license, you can't take that away.