it's pretty obvious the Housing Boom was caused by an inadvertent mistake by the Clinton administration, specifically the HUD. They passed a regulation that made it illegal to deny a mortgage application even if the citizen was too poor to pay it back. Hence a run-away boom.
Aw, shit, someone's wrong on the internet again.
Nope, that's not what happened. Sorry.
(I assume you're talking about the CRA. The majority of the bad loans were made by lenders that were not covered by the CRA.)
This is done by having the server present a certificate, which the client can then verify was signed by one of many trusted authorities.
The only thing the "trusted authorites" confirm is that the person who has the cert paid for it.
Some trust.
The whole SSL certificate crap is a scam. The only interesting thing to know would be "is this site using the same certificate as the last time I connected to it". And the shitty browsers don't tell you that.
(The protocol should also have some reasonable way of doing rollover, like presenting a new certificate in the session "this is what we're going to be using starting...").
That is why SSL authenticates the remote site. Encrypting the transport prevents eavesdropping, while authenticating the remote site prevents man-in-the-middle attacks. You need both to have any degree of security.
But they don't authenticate the remote site. They just check that the remote site has a certificate signed by one of those super trustworthy people like Verisign or the government of China.
It's traditional to give the allegiance of senators and so on.
That's R, R, R, and Blue Dog.
(Not the Dem's are any less corrupt, but don't forget these idiots are claiming to want to bring budgets under control, not give all the cash to their buddies).
The goal for both Meego and Android should be to get their kernel customisations back into mainline.
It's basically already done for Meego.
As for Android, google (hah!) "tokenised dead mice" to see what the chances of that happening are. (Ignore Google's attempt to "fix" the spelling of tokenised).
You notice that strange blue colour to the words "an Apache helicopter gunship gunned down two men"? That's what we call a "link". You can click on it to read the actual report.
You claim the Guardian "left out relevant parts of the story" when you leave out relevant parts of the story yourself. The point of the tiny snippet of the Guardian summary story that mentions the helicopter incident is not that Crazyhorse 18 shot the "insurgents", but that a lawyer gave them the advice "You cannot surrender to an aircraft.".
You are claiming "The Guardian is unreliable, because they didn't give the full details of the 'surrender to a helicopter' incident, so we shouldn't trust them when they tell us US troops threatened to hand captives over to the Wolf Brigade knowing they would be tortured". You've made a totally cack-handed job of showing that the Guardian didn't give the details, showing instead that you didn't bother to look.
Slashdot Mirror
Is he?
http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2010/1026/WikiLeaks-ready-to-drop-a-bombshell-on-Russia.-But-will-Russians-get-to-read-about-it
Yeah, I'd just whip up a bit of python,
Oh, you mean your camera doesn't run Linux. How odd.
No, look at the context,
Saddam was Irans biggest enemy, the one they'd fought a war against.
The Taliban were the next most dangerous,
The US destroyed Saddam, installing a pro-Iranian regime in Iraq.
They removed the Taliban from power, leaving Afghanistan with an Iranian funded government,
Which enemy of Iran will the US destroy next? Saudi or the USA?
My money is on the USA. The process is already advanced.
Aw, shit, someone's wrong on the internet again.
Nope, that's not what happened. Sorry.
(I assume you're talking about the CRA. The majority of the bad loans were made by lenders that were not covered by the CRA.)
The only thing the "trusted authorites" confirm is that the person who has the cert paid for it.
Some trust.
The whole SSL certificate crap is a scam. The only interesting thing to know would be "is this site using the same certificate as the last time I connected to it". And the shitty browsers don't tell you that.
(The protocol should also have some reasonable way of doing rollover, like presenting a new certificate in the session "this is what we're going to be using starting...").
But they don't authenticate the remote site. They just check that the remote site has a certificate signed by one of those super trustworthy people like Verisign or the government of China.
But do you trust some random idiot who paid some money to Verisign?
Do Verisign promise to reimburse you if the person they sold a cert to turns out to be a crook?
What? Logical sequence?
First you took down Irans biggest enemy, Saddam.
Then you took down their second biggest, the Taliban.
The logical sequence would be either:
1. take out Saudi Arabia
2. commit suicide.
It's traditional to give the allegiance of senators and so on.
That's R, R, R, and Blue Dog.
(Not the Dem's are any less corrupt, but don't forget these idiots are claiming to want to bring budgets under control, not give all the cash to their buddies).
Yup, I agree, it's total crap and will permanently warp any child who reads it.
I finished Half Life, downloaded and finished 100s of mods.
Finished Half Life 2.
Finished Half Life 2 episode 1.
Started Episode 2. Just got pissed of with that fucking gravity gun and gave up. That's Half Life all over for me.
Come off it, Norris is a wimp who's scared of Obama.
Yes I can type more than that idiot slashcode.
It's basically already done for Meego.
As for Android, google (hah!) "tokenised dead mice" to see what the chances of that happening are. (Ignore Google's attempt to "fix" the spelling of tokenised).
WTF? Why on earth would Nokia want Dalvik?
Maybe you missed the beginning of the thread. These guys were standing around a water cooler in China. They do make money from selling products.
It's the only solution.
If the license says:
"You can use this software if you sacrifice your first born child to Baal"
And you strike that out because its illegal.
Then what part of the license allows you to use the software?
I doubt they can force you to kill your first born child, but you have no right to use the software if you dont.
Not true unfortunately.
There's the old fat one, the newer slim one, and now the micro-usb one.
Why are you demanding protectionism?
Don't you trust the invisible hand?
Are you some kind of commie?
Seats on TGV class trains often have power sockets now. (Pretty easy for them to do since the train is plugged into a big extension cord).
If you're using a stylus you don't have a capacitative screen, this article is not for you, you don't have to worry about cold fingers.
I lurve my N900 even more on cold days.
No, the worst thing about corporal punishment is that it is used as a fig-leaf by child abusers.
What do you mean by "we", you childless troll?
It's beyond a joke when slashtards start harking back to some fucking nonexistent "golden age".
Why yes, I do have children, and they are about 1000 times more considerate of others than you are.
No, it implies it.
You notice that strange blue colour to the words "an Apache helicopter gunship gunned down two men"? That's what we call a "link". You can click on it to read the actual report.
You claim the Guardian "left out relevant parts of the story" when you leave out relevant parts of the story yourself. The point of the tiny snippet of the Guardian summary story that mentions the helicopter incident is not that Crazyhorse 18 shot the "insurgents", but that a lawyer gave them the advice "You cannot surrender to an aircraft.".
You are claiming "The Guardian is unreliable, because they didn't give the full details of the 'surrender to a helicopter' incident, so we shouldn't trust them when they tell us US troops threatened to hand captives over to the Wolf Brigade knowing they would be tortured". You've made a totally cack-handed job of showing that the Guardian didn't give the details, showing instead that you didn't bother to look.