Slashdot Mirror


User: Dog-Cow

Dog-Cow's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5,362
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5,362

  1. Re:Tablets are dead on Microsoft's Touted iPad Rival Courier Becomes Less Than Vapor · · Score: 0, Troll

    And apparently neither are you. The iPad is a tablet. It is Turing complete. You are just a jealous idiot.

  2. Re:Tablets are dead on Microsoft's Touted iPad Rival Courier Becomes Less Than Vapor · · Score: 1

    Except, of course, for the fact that the iPhone, and by extension the other i, have been supported by YouTube since they were introduced.

  3. Re:Tablets are dead on Microsoft's Touted iPad Rival Courier Becomes Less Than Vapor · · Score: 1

    I think having hover would suck, but it's still trivial to do on an i. Tap to pop up the menu and hold the finger down and slide to make the choice. Absolutely trivial and easy using gestures that are already common on these devices.

  4. Re:How can maintaining the status quo cause job lo on The Truth About Net Neutrality Job Loss · · Score: 1

    Way to totally miss his point.

  5. Re:Can someone explain to me .. on House Proposes Legalizing, Taxing Online Gambling · · Score: 1

    Republicans are not (necessarily) conservative.

  6. Re:Can someone explain to me .. on House Proposes Legalizing, Taxing Online Gambling · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm not saying all Christians are this messed up, but this argument is just another in the long list of reasons Christianity makes no sense.

    Lying to preserve peace is neither evil nor wrong.

  7. Re:1998 exactly on Proof of Concept For Ajax Without JavaScript · · Score: 1

    And perhaps one day a slashdotter will penetrate a girl.

  8. Re:You don't say on South Park's Episode 201 — the Expurgated Version · · Score: 1

    You know almost nothing. You take quotes out of context and you take them literally. At no time in history has the entirety of Torah been taken literally in matters of law. It has always been interpreted.

    The Torah never punishes victims. Rape is not punished by death for either party.

    The Torah never claims that there will be some point in the future when no non-Jews exist, though other scriptures indicate that non-Jews will recognize the supremacy of God and his chosen people. It is never said that they will cease to exist.

  9. Re:You don't say on South Park's Episode 201 — the Expurgated Version · · Score: 1

    No it's not. The Rabbis claimed thousands of years ago that non-Jews are not able to truly understand Torah. Your post lends credence to this idea.

  10. Re:You don't say on South Park's Episode 201 — the Expurgated Version · · Score: -1, Troll

    And posts like this is why it is incumbent on the World's population to wipe every Muslim from its face.

    Unlike Obama would like us to believe, it is impossible to reason with Muslims. No one will be safe until Islam is no more.

  11. Re:I wonder how long until it "accidentally" leaks on South Park's Episode 201 — the Expurgated Version · · Score: 1, Troll

    Throughout history, same-sex couplings have existed, but at no time were they considered a marriage. People today just want to redefine a term with a long-standing meaning to get money from their fellow citizens.

    It is perfectly natural to keep the legal definition of marriage as a coupling between 2 adults that may lead to a biological family. There is no benefit to society to recognize anything else.

    And it's completely illogical to assume that someone who does not eat animal (non-human) meat would suddenly gain a taste for human. But this kind of stupidly-illogical blather is expected from idiots like you.

  12. Re:Apple behind this? on Group Calls For Google Antitrust Probe · · Score: 1

    The GP is not interested in facts or reason. He just wants to spew his hatred for whatever it is he hates at the moment.

  13. Re:Apple behind this? on Group Calls For Google Antitrust Probe · · Score: 0, Troll

    And, by definition, you are a waste of resources and should be torn in half. And fed to the dogs.

    Even if Google has a monopoly in some market, they are doing nothing illegal by merely existing. Since you can't grasp this point, you really are too deficient to bother with.

  14. Re:Please don't... on Apple To Buy ARM? · · Score: 1

    No, it's not a conundrum, you fucking moron. You are free to take their source and run it anywhere you like. They make it all available to the public. You do not need to be a Mac OS X licensee to get access to it.

  15. Re:Please don't... on Apple To Buy ARM? · · Score: 1

    I taught myself Assembly on x86, 16 bit, when I was in High School. Are you and the OP so ridiculously stupid that you couldn't do the same? What exactly is difficult about it?

  16. Re:Buying ARM for a leg? on Apple To Buy ARM? · · Score: 1

    Vertical Integration is not illegal.

  17. Re:Buying ARM for a leg? on Apple To Buy ARM? · · Score: -1, Troll

    I hope you are run over while you stare in horror at your daughter being raped.

    There is nothing evil about the way Apple goes about trying to maintain control over its product line. They do nothing unethical or illegal. It has been proven in Federal Court that Microsoft did both to maintain control of OEM sales channels.

    You are so twisted by hatred that you are a danger to everyone around you.

  18. Re:Sick and tired on The iPad As In-Car Entertainment System Killer · · Score: 1

    Yeah, because visual quality is the overriding concern for kids in the backseat of a car. You aren't all that bright. I almost feel pity for you.

  19. Re:The Peoples' Interest Should Come First on Group Calls For Google Antitrust Probe · · Score: 2, Funny

    I agree. To that end, you should be killed now.

  20. Re:Apple behind this? on Group Calls For Google Antitrust Probe · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    By your logic, competition is absolutely impossible because by competing, you're being anti-competitive, which prevents competition, which means you couldn't have been competing in the first place.

    You are a stupid piece of shit. When you die, the world will rejoice.

  21. Re:Hilarity on Adobe Stops Development For iPhone · · Score: 1

    There would also be no Adobe. 20 years ago you had no viable GUI-driven PC except the Mac.

  22. Re:Adobe also said... on Adobe Stops Development For iPhone · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    You are a moron and an idiot. I hope you feel accomplished.

  23. Re:Who gets to decide what the iPad is? on History Repeats Itself — Mac & the iPad · · Score: 1

    Features you do not like are not inherent flaws. Neither is the absence of features.

    I do not wish to own a cell phone. I own an iPod Touch, and I love it. I use it all the time. I ordered an iPad because it's everything the iPod Touch is (except for portability), but with a larger screen, faster operation and with 3G.

    I have no illusions about what the iPad is or is not. I am a registered developer and have 2 apps on the App Store.

  24. Re:Who gets to decide what the iPad is? on History Repeats Itself — Mac & the iPad · · Score: 1

    I think your daughter (if you have one) should be raped and your skin torn off over a period of months until you die from the pain.

    My mother doesn't do content creation either, but she's worth infinitely more than you could even aspire to.

  25. Re:Who gets to decide what the iPad is? on History Repeats Itself — Mac & the iPad · · Score: 1

    I don't disagree with you in principle, but my Macbook switches seamlessly between WiFi and Ethernet when I (un)plug the cable. Even existing connections switch over to the faster interface when I plug in, or switch back when I unplug.