If you're talking about an adult penis into a 10 year old's vagina, why wouldn't it fit? A baby's head can fit through a 12 year old's vagina, after all. If you're talking about the anus, that's not a big deal either -- you just stretch it. There's no physical barrier.
The most troubling issue is that the UK government awarded the contract to a private telecom that uses a proprietary network rather than to an independent organization that uses freely available spectrum and open source solutions?
The answer to this non-question is 42 cows per square inch.
It's far more likely that TCP/IPv6 will be around in 30 years. TCP itself has been with us for about 40, and it doesn't look like it will be replaced any time soon. (Replace TCP with UDP, if that makes sense for the application.)
You can just package up Xcode.app and distribute it on floppy... er, USB key. It's not that hard. The betas are packaged as DMGs, which are also easy to pass around.
If you know so little about how to do basic file management on a Mac, perhaps you shouldn't be developing apps.
What about it? This is a tainted copy of Xcode that can't be doing anything more than including some malware classes in binaries. Probably uses the ObjC +load method to kickstart itself when the app starts. There's no way for the tainted code to have a clue as to what the app does, and thus no way to "add another email address" or "redirect bank transfers".
That's only true on Android, and only until Marshmallow. On iOS, if the app refuses to work without permissions, the app will be rejected (if Apple catches it). I suspect that Apple would similarly reject updates if customers complain about the app. And if Apple does allow the app through, customers will reject it when they find out it requires permissions it doesn't need for its primary functionality. No one would expect a video chat app to work w/o video and mic, for example.
I bet that phone made phone calls and maybe supported SMS. People upgrade smartphones for the same reason as conventional computers -- they want to do more with them.
That's OK. Apple doesn't have any use for a person so stupid they can't manage iTunes. They probably don't care much for douches who consider manually managing the music on their phone to be the primary feature of said phone. Apple tends to value people who want to do stuff.
You're not Apple's key demographic because they don't actually value idiots. Apple wouldn't release OS updates for 5 year old devices if they viewed (or wanted you to view) those devices as disposable. The last Macbook that I owned was used for 7 years before being given away to someone who needed a better laptop than what they had. It's still in use today.
Apple makes more profit per unit sold than another phone manufacturer on the planet. To claim they are somehow "wrong" is nothing more than a whine. If you need those additional 16GB, buy a different phone. Apple doesn't care; why should you?
So they can buy a phone that meets their needs. It's not as if even Apple doesn't offer other options, and then there's Android, which is all over the map on options. This whole non-story is just another "I want Apple to cater to my niche because I don't want to spend more money" whine.
They also encourage usage of iCloud for all those media, and they added a streaming service. Clearly Apple understands that 16GB is not always enough, but for many users 64GB might be overkill, and they don't want to spend the money.
At the end of the day, Apple offers a product. Take it or leave it; that's the Apple Way. It makes a lot of money for Apple, so it really doesn't make any sense to claim they are objectively wrong in some way. There's no requirement for them to cater to some tiny percentage of people who claim Apple is leaving money on the table. They don't need it.
There is no particular reason to assume that those with 16GB iPhones purposefully keep a lot of space free (your estimate of 12GB usable is very close) just because. Given that 16GB is the low-end of modern iPhones (going back to at least the 6), it seems odd that the median would be 7GB if people felt 16GB was a constraint. Of course, I don't know the source for that number, so if it includes 8GB models, it would make more sense.
Have you ever been to Tel Aviv? I'd be amazed if an Arab would get more than strange looks if he were to attempt that. Perhaps the security guard would take a close look at the box.
See, in Israel, they know that Arabs looking to blow up a shopping mall don't bring in a box with a timer on it. They wear a vest underneath their jacket that is full of explosives, packed with nails and other shrapnel. We know this because it's happened dozens or hundreds of times over the years. Never make the mistake of thinking that Israelis are as stupid as Texans.
Controls might be an issue, but modern iOS devices rival the vast majority of televisions for resolution. I think most games would do well enough, especially if the iOS device could be used as a controller.
Slashdot Mirror
If you're talking about an adult penis into a 10 year old's vagina, why wouldn't it fit? A baby's head can fit through a 12 year old's vagina, after all. If you're talking about the anus, that's not a big deal either -- you just stretch it. There's no physical barrier.
The most troubling issue is that the UK government awarded the contract to a private telecom that uses a proprietary network rather than to an independent organization that uses freely available spectrum and open source solutions?
The answer to this non-question is 42 cows per square inch.
It's far more likely that TCP/IPv6 will be around in 30 years. TCP itself has been with us for about 40, and it doesn't look like it will be replaced any time soon. (Replace TCP with UDP, if that makes sense for the application.)
*your, not you're.
If you kill yourself, you're unholy obsession with Macs will trouble you no more.
Yes.
You are a fucking idiot and a complete asshole. Please put yourself out of your misery by strangling yourself with a lightning (tm) cable.
You can just package up Xcode.app and distribute it on floppy... er, USB key. It's not that hard. The betas are packaged as DMGs, which are also easy to pass around.
If you know so little about how to do basic file management on a Mac, perhaps you shouldn't be developing apps.
What about it? This is a tainted copy of Xcode that can't be doing anything more than including some malware classes in binaries. Probably uses the ObjC +load method to kickstart itself when the app starts. There's no way for the tainted code to have a clue as to what the app does, and thus no way to "add another email address" or "redirect bank transfers".
Computers aren't magic.
That's only true on Android, and only until Marshmallow. On iOS, if the app refuses to work without permissions, the app will be rejected (if Apple catches it). I suspect that Apple would similarly reject updates if customers complain about the app. And if Apple does allow the app through, customers will reject it when they find out it requires permissions it doesn't need for its primary functionality. No one would expect a video chat app to work w/o video and mic, for example.
You are a complete and utter moron. Nothing you wrote contradicts the GP. At all. Strangle yourself with a mouse cord. You'll feel better.
Then don't buy one. Apple doesn't want shit-faces like you for a customer anyway.
I bet that phone made phone calls and maybe supported SMS. People upgrade smartphones for the same reason as conventional computers -- they want to do more with them.
That's OK. Apple doesn't have any use for a person so stupid they can't manage iTunes. They probably don't care much for douches who consider manually managing the music on their phone to be the primary feature of said phone. Apple tends to value people who want to do stuff.
You're not Apple's key demographic because they don't actually value idiots. Apple wouldn't release OS updates for 5 year old devices if they viewed (or wanted you to view) those devices as disposable. The last Macbook that I owned was used for 7 years before being given away to someone who needed a better laptop than what they had. It's still in use today.
Apple makes more profit per unit sold than another phone manufacturer on the planet. To claim they are somehow "wrong" is nothing more than a whine. If you need those additional 16GB, buy a different phone. Apple doesn't care; why should you?
So they can buy a phone that meets their needs. It's not as if even Apple doesn't offer other options, and then there's Android, which is all over the map on options. This whole non-story is just another "I want Apple to cater to my niche because I don't want to spend more money" whine.
They also encourage usage of iCloud for all those media, and they added a streaming service. Clearly Apple understands that 16GB is not always enough, but for many users 64GB might be overkill, and they don't want to spend the money.
At the end of the day, Apple offers a product. Take it or leave it; that's the Apple Way. It makes a lot of money for Apple, so it really doesn't make any sense to claim they are objectively wrong in some way. There's no requirement for them to cater to some tiny percentage of people who claim Apple is leaving money on the table. They don't need it.
There is no particular reason to assume that those with 16GB iPhones purposefully keep a lot of space free (your estimate of 12GB usable is very close) just because. Given that 16GB is the low-end of modern iPhones (going back to at least the 6), it seems odd that the median would be 7GB if people felt 16GB was a constraint. Of course, I don't know the source for that number, so if it includes 8GB models, it would make more sense.
The price of an item rarely corresponds to the cost. I know that intelligence is not a common attribute of posters on slashdot, but please try.
I don't think you have a firm grasp on the word "monopoly".
Have you ever been to Tel Aviv? I'd be amazed if an Arab would get more than strange looks if he were to attempt that. Perhaps the security guard would take a close look at the box.
See, in Israel, they know that Arabs looking to blow up a shopping mall don't bring in a box with a timer on it. They wear a vest underneath their jacket that is full of explosives, packed with nails and other shrapnel. We know this because it's happened dozens or hundreds of times over the years. Never make the mistake of thinking that Israelis are as stupid as Texans.
Your post demonstrates that you are a snobbish twat, but in no way does it tell us whether you use FB or Twitter.
Hint: when was the last time you logged in?
The energy input is finite (on the Universe-scale timeline), therefore the motion is finite in time. It's really that simple.
Controls might be an issue, but modern iOS devices rival the vast majority of televisions for resolution. I think most games would do well enough, especially if the iOS device could be used as a controller.