That's what I usually do when on a remote computer, but it won't work all the time. A couple of months ago, for example, I was stationed at Ft. Lee (VA) for two weeks, and the security on those computers was completely airtight (menus were disabled, you couldn't download anything, you couldn't browse the hard drive and run programs even with the SaveAs trick). Gmail worked just fine however, as any other webmail would have. It was nice to have that option available, that's all.
Australian authorities have released the goatse guy, who was in their custody after an incident involving a passing police car, a jelly doughnut, and a koala bear.
Still. You input your password and the black box compares it with the internal password. Letting you know the results of the comparison contradicts the assumption that the device is write-only (by reading at least one bit of information). That's what he was saying.
I believe this is the slashdot article you mentioned. (For the goatse paranoid: http://slashdot.org/articles/00/10/17/1152230.shtm l). I have to agree with you there. That is a fine example of computer art. ---
But he was trying to say that in this case, you can't trust the server. If your complying client connects to the cheater's specially compiled server he'll be able to to cheat regardless, even if he too was running a complying client. For example, the server could recognize his ip and give him infinite ammo.
Er..this isn't about encryption. That would just prevent any middleman from intercepting and reading his emails while they are being sent. It's the fact that the emails he sends thru Government networks become public record, and so people can request them thru the Freedom of Information Act. He'd be required by law to give up his encryption keys.
Well, considering that the software was already written by someone else, should we still be allowed to patent the gene? I guess we can go off patenting half a microsoft dll and that'd be ok. Right?
-----
Re:Why not use the Quake engine?
on
3Dwm Updates
·
· Score: 1
Slashdot Mirror
You must've copied that from the last slashback, since it's been a while.
Not sure, but it sounds like Monty Python (the roman emperor in The Life of Brian).
of course you can. the real question is, will you make it across intact.
That's what I usually do when on a remote computer, but it won't work all the time. A couple of months ago, for example, I was stationed at Ft. Lee (VA) for two weeks, and the security on those computers was completely airtight (menus were disabled, you couldn't download anything, you couldn't browse the hard drive and run programs even with the SaveAs trick). Gmail worked just fine however, as any other webmail would have. It was nice to have that option available, that's all.
Download curl, then you can do stuff like
/ img[1-99].jpg -o "#1#2-#3.jpg"
curl http://hugetractsofland.com/{amy,crystal}/[01-05]
The perfect command....which I've yet to find a use for. um..yeah.
Nah, he's talking about the Hell's Grannies episode.
I'm a Diebold stockholder, you insensitive clod!
Help! I'm too lazy to click!
Australian authorities have released the goatse guy, who was in their custody after an incident involving a passing police car, a jelly doughnut, and a koala bear.
It's probably The Watcher.
I don't know, dude. 5" is very average.
Heh. For a moment I thought you meant Marquis de Sade. Well, considering some of these UI interfaces, I guess that's not too far from the truth. :)
Well, if it's of any help, I'm using 1.0rc1 on windows and I installed the calendar from http://mozilla.org/projects/calendar/
Still. You input your password and the black box compares it with
the internal password. Letting you know the results of the comparison
contradicts the assumption that the device is write-only (by reading
at least one bit of information). That's what he was saying.
I believe this is the slashdot article you mentioned.m l).
(For the goatse paranoid: http://slashdot.org/articles/00/10/17/1152230.sht
I have to agree with you there. That is a fine example of computer art.
---
Right.
But he was trying to say that in this case, you can't trust the server. If your complying client connects to the cheater's specially compiled server he'll be able to to cheat regardless, even if he too was running a complying client. For example, the server could recognize his ip and give him infinite ammo.
Those emails would be classified, as they are a matter of national security.
Er..this isn't about encryption. That would just prevent any middleman from intercepting and reading his emails while they are being sent. It's the fact that the emails he sends thru Government networks become public record, and so people can request them thru the Freedom of Information Act. He'd be required by law to give up his encryption keys.
he was talking about the V6 part of the parent post.
Wow. That's quite a filter there. It filters the wrong stuff though. :)
Well, considering that the software was already written by someone else, should we still be allowed to patent the gene? I guess we can go off patenting half a microsoft dll and that'd be ok. Right?
-----
Is this it? http://www.cs.unm.edu/~dlchao/flake/doom/
er..there's always at least one prime number between n and 2n. Nonetheless, cool idea :)
You got that right