Any loser who plays DDR at any time anywhere other than designated arcades and laundromats should be ridiculed and persecuted as much as possible. When will people learn that DDR isn't cool, and talking about DDR is even more uncool?
The main reason why CB's and Ham radio users are exempt from this is mainly because they lobby a lot so their interests are reflected in the legislation. Really. I am a member of the ARRL (National Ham Radio Organization) and they have people in Washington who prevent legislation like the cell phone bans applying to them. Another reason is that most Ham users are involved in one sort of community service utilizing their radio and their vehicle, so it would be pretty detrimental to prevent that. Also, if you ban two way radios, what will the cops do?
So the game isn't fun for everyone. Just because you realized that you spent however many months of your life playing this stupid thing doesn't mean that other people don't enjoy it. Instead of bitching about the game, why not find out why YOU have an addictive personality and deal with it. Though some people may joke calling "Everquest" "Evercrack", it isn't physically addicting. The game isn't the cause of this, you are. This isn't an excellent article, it's an inane rant on why some guy got turned off from some game because it stopped being fun.
You use Kerberos for POP3 authentication,
Tell me please how Kerberos, an authentication method, secures a network? If your kerb password is sent in plaintext, it can still be sniffed. Does using buzzwords increase your security too? Maybe we can HTML my WEP NET and FBI my LAX...
Thank god we were born with this really cool thing called "free will". If that free will thingie is in an environment that actually allows it, you can discount lists like this as not important to you. This isn't the end-all be-all of "hero" lists. Since it's made by the Dutch, one would assume them to think more highly of achievements that have affected them more. The list could be ridiculous to you because you may not have the same point of view as the creators of the list. If you don't like the list, don't bitch about it, ignore it (or maybe even better, write your own)!
Ahh, I think the Original Poster ment to say that with this "solution", you could get a cheap SCSI 120 gig out of an IDE 120 Gig+SCSI Adapter, but it's not worth it. But what do I know?
10 microseconds, eh? That's pretty good. When I ping localhost on my machine, I can only get around 45 microsectonds.:( What type of super-fast network do you use? I think avionics manufacturers would like to talk to you...
PING studorgs (127.0.0.1) from 127.0.0.1 : 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from studorgs (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=44 usec 64 bytes from studorgs (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=45 usec 64 bytes from studorgs (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=46 usec 64 bytes from studorgs (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=46 usec
Have you ever taken high school physics? Let 's look at the definition of "Gain". http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=gain
4. Electronics. An increase in signal power, voltage, or current by an amplifier, expressed as the ratio of output to input. Also called amplification. Obviously, gain is an increase in SIGNAL POWER. How would you think that a LOS signal could travel further (eliminating atmospheric anomalies, of course) unless you increased the power? Magic? Maximum power for 802.11 can be anywhere from 50mW to 250mW to 1W.
That's just what you WOULD have wanted me to do, WOULDN'T YOU? I just use RANDOM capitilization in posts to throw PEOPLE off. Or maybe I have NO CLUE over what I'm posting. Anyhow, the FCC usually doesn't arrest people, so I probably just subconciously did that. Get your license, do it! It's fun. Women won't like you, but let's not kid ourselves here, it's not like slashdot is a turnon for anyone who we'd really want. http://www.arrl.org is the website for the organization that does the testing. They're nice guys.
You realize that's illegal, right? If you have something like that on your roof, you can be arrested and FINED and have all your related radio stuff confiscated if/when the FCC finds you -- and they DO drive around. There is a legal limit of the strength of the signal leaving an 802.11 device. By putting a very directional antenna (dish/pringles can), you effectively increase the radiated energy to what may be unsafe (and definately illegal) levels. They don't measure at the input to the antenna, but the radiated signal from the antenna. Anyhow, making your own antennas to radiate RF energy can be illegal to begin with. If you REALLY want to play with stuff like this, look into licensing yourself somehow with the FCC. The easiest way to start is a Technician class Amateur Radio license. It's a simple electronics theory and basic rules test which takes no less than 15 minutes (I did mine in 5). You get full privledges above 6 meters. That means that you can use many times more power to play with. You can move on from there to doing intercontinental datacomms using the HF bands which is a lot more fun and challenging than 802.11 will ever be.
Just because you CAN do something like this doesn't mean that you have to. I'm not some sort of crazed tree hugger, but I don't like things that are disposible if they don't have to be. All the stuff that goes into making CDs and DVDs are terrible enough, and now we want to throw them into the landfills? Instead of shipping 5,000 dvds to Blockbuster every few months, they'd be shipping 50,000 or 500,000. It just seems like a complete and utter waste of resources on every front. I won't even begin to think about what MSFT and other software companies would do with this.. After a year you can't use your Windows XP cd anymore?
Wrong. DiVX never caught on because there were alternatives available. In this world, windows is the only show in town for most people. Forget linux, it's not even in their head, so they wouldn't think about it. Their business uses windows, their websites require windows, so why not just use windows? If it's the only show in town, you don't have much of a choice.
I thought it was pretty cool how he fit in the anti-union rhetoric in a news story about a sparc laptop. Offtopic, anyone? Cmon, get a brain moderators.
"Yes, they are slowly improving, but modern PCs are still behind where workstations were years ago, and a modern Intel based server is well behind a SPARC based machine."
Not exactly true. I work as an Opens Systems Programmer at a major research university. I have a P2-333 and an Sun Ultra 1 on my desk. Which do you think is less painful to use? I'll give you a hint, it doesn't have a 64 bit processor on it. I'll tell you, I'd rather use my P2-333 to serve a website than the Ultra 1. So those sparcs you speak of are rarely as fast as the newer PC's in most everyday tasks.
That being said, it sure is cool to say that you're running sparc linux, and in the winter I'd rather have the sparc on my desk to keep me warm.
I for one am upset the sniper is probably arrested...The media circus made reading the local university newspaper actually interesting -- I loved trying to predict who they would blow away next. Sure it suchs that people died, but you gotta admit that The Sniper really did kick the entire areas ass and that's pretty good -- even if they did screw up in the end.
Read the article. They're only charging them $50 TOTAL, not $50 per butterfly -- they said they could charge $50 per butterfly, but we all know that would be pretty much useless as MSFT has more money than god.
The problem is that the FILESYSTEM itself cannot allocate a smaller amount of bytes than, say, n. So, if you have a program that is n-1, it still takes up n bytes. So, it's really not all that practical in 99.999999% of uses (that includes boot disks.)
Slashdot Mirror
Any loser who plays DDR at any time anywhere other than designated arcades and laundromats should be ridiculed and persecuted as much as possible. When will people learn that DDR isn't cool, and talking about DDR is even more uncool?
The main reason why CB's and Ham radio users are exempt from this is mainly because they lobby a lot so their interests are reflected in the legislation. Really. I am a member of the ARRL (National Ham Radio Organization) and they have people in Washington who prevent legislation like the cell phone bans applying to them. Another reason is that most Ham users are involved in one sort of community service utilizing their radio and their vehicle, so it would be pretty detrimental to prevent that. Also, if you ban two way radios, what will the cops do?
How do I send my kerb password from my machine to the host? Telnet? Plaintext. Ftp? Plaintext. HTTP? Plaintext...
So the game isn't fun for everyone. Just because you realized that you spent however many months of your life playing this stupid thing doesn't mean that other people don't enjoy it. Instead of bitching about the game, why not find out why YOU have an addictive personality and deal with it. Though some people may joke calling "Everquest" "Evercrack", it isn't physically addicting. The game isn't the cause of this, you are. This isn't an excellent article, it's an inane rant on why some guy got turned off from some game because it stopped being fun.
You use Kerberos for POP3 authentication,
Tell me please how Kerberos, an authentication method, secures a network? If your kerb password is sent in plaintext, it can still be sniffed. Does using buzzwords increase your security too? Maybe we can HTML my WEP NET and FBI my LAX...
Just eat the pringles in their pringles can and the network will drop like a rock! You know, once you pop you can't stop...
Uhh, you can't archive all encrypted ethernet traffic and chew on it for years? Check out tcpdump.
You could have just ignored this, saving yourself countless keystrokes! Oh no, have I just opened up a recursive flame?
Thank god we were born with this really cool thing called "free will". If that free will thingie is in an environment that actually allows it, you can discount lists like this as not important to you. This isn't the end-all be-all of "hero" lists. Since it's made by the Dutch, one would assume them to think more highly of achievements that have affected them more. The list could be ridiculous to you because you may not have the same point of view as the creators of the list. If you don't like the list, don't bitch about it, ignore it (or maybe even better, write your own)!
Ahh, I think the Original Poster ment to say that with this "solution", you could get a cheap SCSI 120 gig out of an IDE 120 Gig+SCSI Adapter, but it's not worth it. But what do I know?
Ok, so you have all killed the
...
1. xxxxxxxxxx
2.
3. profit
And then you killed the
IN SOVIET RUSSIA
And now you have to kill killing IN SOVIET russia...what is this world coming to
Right on. There was one for Apple ][ as well, and I think it was from the Beagle Bros....But i forget. :(
10 microseconds, eh? That's pretty good. When I ping localhost on my machine, I can only get around 45 microsectonds. :( What type of super-fast network do you use? I think avionics manufacturers would like to talk to you...
PING studorgs (127.0.0.1) from 127.0.0.1 : 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from studorgs (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=44 usec
64 bytes from studorgs (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=45 usec
64 bytes from studorgs (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=46 usec
64 bytes from studorgs (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=46 usec
Have you ever taken high school physics? Let
's look at the definition of "Gain". http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=gain
4. Electronics. An increase in signal power, voltage, or current by an amplifier, expressed as the ratio of output to input. Also called amplification.
Obviously, gain is an increase in SIGNAL POWER. How would you think that a LOS signal could travel further (eliminating atmospheric anomalies, of course) unless you increased the power? Magic? Maximum power for 802.11 can be anywhere from 50mW to 250mW to 1W.
That's just what you WOULD have wanted me to do, WOULDN'T YOU? I just use RANDOM capitilization in posts to throw PEOPLE off. Or maybe I have NO CLUE over what I'm posting. Anyhow, the FCC usually doesn't arrest people, so I probably just subconciously did that. Get your license, do it! It's fun. Women won't like you, but let's not kid ourselves here, it's not like slashdot is a turnon for anyone who we'd really want. http://www.arrl.org is the website for the organization that does the testing. They're nice guys.
You realize that's illegal, right? If you have something like that on your roof, you can be arrested and FINED and have all your related radio stuff confiscated if/when the FCC finds you -- and they DO drive around. There is a legal limit of the strength of the signal leaving an 802.11 device. By putting a very directional antenna (dish/pringles can), you effectively increase the radiated energy to what may be unsafe (and definately illegal) levels. They don't measure at the input to the antenna, but the radiated signal from the antenna. Anyhow, making your own antennas to radiate RF energy can be illegal to begin with. If you REALLY want to play with stuff like this, look into licensing yourself somehow with the FCC. The easiest way to start is a Technician class Amateur Radio license. It's a simple electronics theory and basic rules test which takes no less than 15 minutes (I did mine in 5). You get full privledges above 6 meters. That means that you can use many times more power to play with. You can move on from there to doing intercontinental datacomms using the HF bands which is a lot more fun and challenging than 802.11 will ever be.
>2 minutes? Like an hour?
Just because you CAN do something like this doesn't mean that you have to. I'm not some sort of crazed tree hugger, but I don't like things that are disposible if they don't have to be. All the stuff that goes into making CDs and DVDs are terrible enough, and now we want to throw them into the landfills? Instead of shipping 5,000 dvds to Blockbuster every few months, they'd be shipping 50,000 or 500,000. It just seems like a complete and utter waste of resources on every front. I won't even begin to think about what MSFT and other software companies would do with this.. After a year you can't use your Windows XP cd anymore?
you know, there are commands in RPM other than --install. How about man rpm, wise guy.
rpm -q -l yourmomma.rpm
Wrong. DiVX never caught on because there were alternatives available. In this world, windows is the only show in town for most people. Forget linux, it's not even in their head, so they wouldn't think about it. Their business uses windows, their websites require windows, so why not just use windows? If it's the only show in town, you don't have much of a choice.
I thought it was pretty cool how he fit in the anti-union rhetoric in a news story about a sparc laptop. Offtopic, anyone? Cmon, get a brain moderators.
"Yes, they are slowly improving, but modern PCs are still behind where workstations were years ago, and a modern Intel based server is well behind a SPARC based machine."
Not exactly true. I work as an Opens Systems Programmer at a major research university. I have a P2-333 and an Sun Ultra 1 on my desk. Which do you think is less painful to use? I'll give you a hint, it doesn't have a 64 bit processor on it. I'll tell you, I'd rather use my P2-333 to serve a website than the Ultra 1. So those sparcs you speak of are rarely as fast as the newer PC's in most everyday tasks.
That being said, it sure is cool to say that you're running sparc linux, and in the winter I'd rather have the sparc on my desk to keep me warm.
I for one am upset the sniper is probably arrested...The media circus made reading the local university newspaper actually interesting -- I loved trying to predict who they would blow away next. Sure it suchs that people died, but you gotta admit that The Sniper really did kick the entire areas ass and that's pretty good -- even if they did screw up in the end.
Read the article. They're only charging them $50 TOTAL, not $50 per butterfly -- they said they could charge $50 per butterfly, but we all know that would be pretty much useless as MSFT has more money than god.
The problem is that the FILESYSTEM itself cannot allocate a smaller amount of bytes than, say, n. So, if you have a program that is n-1, it still takes up n bytes. So, it's really not all that practical in 99.999999% of uses (that includes boot disks.)