Slashdot Mirror


Linus Is A Hero

oever writes "The dutch broadcaster KRO has chosen 365 modern saints or heros. One of them is Linus Torvalds, chosen for his work in on Linux and 'Open Source'. Too bad RMS or Saint Ignuciuis he wasn't chosen, even though he was recommended."

343 comments

  1. heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    always knew it

  2. hmmm.. by sardonic2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think that guy is on crack... you look at the others he choose? James Taylor?? Tina Turner?? whats the world coming too...

    1. Re:hmmm.. by Nyh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Did you understand why he has choosen them?

      Tina turner: for overcomming humiliation
      James Taylor: for getting rid of drugs

      Nyh!

    2. Re:hmmm.. by Fyz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey, they don't smoke crack in the Netherlands!

      They smoke weed!

    3. Re:hmmm.. by Lobsang · · Score: 1

      Tina Turner??

      Come think about it. She did spare Mel Gibson's life in MadMax didn't she? :)

    4. Re:hmmm.. by The+Turd+Report · · Score: 1
      James Taylor: for getting rid of drugs

      Oh, yeah. I remember before Mr. Taylor came around there were drugs everywhere. Now, it is impossible to buy drugs. Thanks, Mr. Taylor! :)

    5. Re:hmmm.. by tsa · · Score: 2

      Exactly! And while doing that they made this really shitty website! It doesn't work in Lynx and also not in Mozilla although I have flash installed. By the way, I'm Dutch too.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    6. Re:hmmm.. by operagost · · Score: 2

      Don't forget Kelly Van der Veer- transsexual role model.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    7. Re:hmmm.. by ArmedGeek · · Score: 1

      It doesn't work in Lynx and also not in Mozilla although I have flash installed.

      um, I can view it with Mozilla 1.2.1. I don't know about Linux yet as I'm currently on my only Win2kpro machine right now.

      --
      Work is punishment for failing to procrastinate effectively.
    8. Re:hmmm.. by xtremex · · Score: 2

      It works perfectly iwith Mozilla 1.2 on Linux....

      --
      If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
    9. Re:hmmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes music and kernels are needed much more than food or peace.

    10. Re:hmmm.. by mackstann · · Score: 2

      gotta get that "only" in there, to make sure everybody know's you're 3j33t and only have one windows box! linux haCCXXOR!!

    11. Re:hmmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One name invalidates the entire pantheon: Sting.

    12. Re:hmmm.. by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1
      I think that guy is on crack... you look at the others he choose? James Taylor?? Tina Turner?? whats the world coming too...
      An end, possibly?
  3. Common sense prevails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    RMS?!

    RMS is a fucking uncompromising, intolerant fruitcake who -- unlike Linus -- doesn't understand the necessity of always having a right tool for the job (whether it is proprietary or free is irrelevant).

  4. Church of Linux! by caluml · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have already said I worship in the Church of Linux.

    This is going to make those "it's not a religious" arguments a lot harder!

    1. Re:Church of Linux! by the_other_one · · Score: 1

      It's not a religious. It's a religion

      Repent. Convert from the Beast of Redmond!

      The Beast of Antartica will save you.

      --
      134340: I am not a number. I am a free planet!
    2. Re:Church of Linux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right after reading your post the ad for a "Relion 130 Linux cluster server" caught my eye, except I read "Religion 130 Linux cluster server" and thought "Oh god, already?"

    3. Re:Church of Linux! by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 1

      The Church of GNU/Linux, you heathen! Death to the infidels!

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    4. Re:Church of Linux! by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "I have already said I worship in the Church of Linux."

      Is it true that you had to assemble your own chairs, but once you do you can take them home and use them for a variety of purposes?

      Just thought I'd ask. I'm from the Church of Windows. Our chairs come pre-assembled and are quite comfortable, but there's a very specific commandment about using the chair in a particular way.

    5. Re:Church of Linux! by flacco · · Score: 2
      I'm from the Church of Windows. Our chairs come pre-assembled and are quite comfortable, but there's a very specific commandment about using the chair in a particular way.

      Then there are those passages in the Microsoft Bible that require each paritioner to lubricate his anus before attending services.

      Pretty strict with that collection plate too.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  5. Linux kernel did not need GCC/GNU/RMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Linus could have built Linux on that other free compiler and UNIX toolchain. Er... I guess there was no other one.

    1. Re:Linux kernel did not need GCC/GNU/RMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, minix did include a compiler (no source available) co-written by Mr. Tanenbaum, as well as many Unix-y tools contributed by the community. They weren't as full featured as the gnu unix tools, but they did exist. Minix itself could be built with MSDOS compilers such as Borland C, IIRC.

    2. Re:Linux kernel did not need GCC/GNU/RMS by njchick · · Score: 3, Informative

      Two other free compilers:
      lcc
      TenDRA
      If not gcc, there would be even more free compilers. Writing a compiler is not as simple as writing another ICQ client, but it's still not rocket science.

    3. Re:Linux kernel did not need GCC/GNU/RMS by Elbereth · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, and RMS doesn't have a house. He needs MIT. Maybe we should start calling him MIT/Stallman.

    4. Re:Linux kernel did not need GCC/GNU/RMS by Tolleman · · Score: 1

      True, thought. Its rather hard to change now. Since if you switch all tools to for example the bsd ones. You might aswell use BSD.

    5. Re:Linux kernel did not need GCC/GNU/RMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So many errors in your logic...
      What's a compiler without the entire GNU toolchain (/bin/*, gdb, as, bash)?
      Also, the compilers you cited did not exist when Linus started.
      The "not rocket science" argument doesn't wash.
      Linus was standing on the shoulders of a giant, namely, Richard Stallman.

    6. Re:Linux kernel did not need GCC/GNU/RMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if writing a compiler is so simple then writing a kernel is child's play by that standard.

      There are more free kernels out there than you cna shake a stick at.

      So if writing GCC is worthless than Linux must somehow be less than worthless.

    7. Re:Linux kernel did not need GCC/GNU/RMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Writing a compiler easier than writing a kernel? Stallman must not have gotten that memo. HURD is been "just around the corner" for what, 10 years now?

    8. Re:Linux kernel did not need GCC/GNU/RMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well HURD is more than just a cheap copy of existing technologies like linux, instead it actually tries to innovate...

    9. Re:Linux kernel did not need GCC/GNU/RMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? How?

    10. Re:Linux kernel did not need GCC/GNU/RMS by njchick · · Score: 2
      Writing good portable software is hard, whether it's a kernel or a compiler. You cannot really compare what's harder, because the efforts depend on the goals, and the goals are defined in different terms for compilers and kernels.

      You can compare the number of supported processors, but everything else - correctness, effectiveness, reliability, resource consumption - cannot be compared between different classes of sortware.

      What I was trying to say is that the existence of gcc wasn't a precondition for Linux. Linus could have started his work on the kernel with some other compiler, even if it was slower, non-free, and non-portable.

      Many projects changed the compiler between versions. BeOS switched from Metrowerks to gcc. It would not be impossible to switch Linux to gcc.

    11. Re:Linux kernel did not need GCC/GNU/RMS by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 0

      I am no fan of GNU/Linux (as opposed to Linux), and I think that these days RMS is just plain jealous of Linus. However, I still think he has had a much larger roll to play than Linus has.

      True, there were other compilers, but that alone wouldn't be enough. A kernel does no an OS make. What about all the other gazillion Unix tools?

      In fact, IIRC GNU GPL was the first well thought through free software license. Most other "freeware" licenses basicaly said something along the lines of "do whatever you like so long as you acknowledge the original author, and don't sell it for profit. Imagine what would have happened to Linux today if it was under one of those sloppy licenses?

      First the lesser scenario: Companies like RedHat, who certainly have had a key role to play in making Linux a mainstream OS couldn't have existed because of the prohibition on selling. From a "big picture" perspective, the provision of the GPL that allows you to sell "free software" makes sense.

      The second scenario: without the explicit protection of the "openness" of the source code it would be so much easier for Mr.Gates to "embrace and expand" linux.

      I think FSF did a rather dumb thing by leaving the Kernel for the last, but on the whole, I think RMS and GNU have had a much larger role to play than Linux. If linux hadn't come along in 1991, I'm sure GNU would have had a kernel by now... GNU was just 7 years old then.

    12. Re:Linux kernel did not need GCC/GNU/RMS by njchick · · Score: 1
      You are replying to things I didn't write. The license of Linux has nothing to do with the compiler that was used to develop it.

      Couldn't you reply without telling me whether you are a fan of somebody or something and without putting words into my mouth?

    13. Re:Linux kernel did not need GCC/GNU/RMS by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1
      Couldn't you reply without telling me whether you are a fan of somebody or something and without putting words into my mouth?


      nope. Like most slashdotters, my every post must:
      (a) Be written without reading the article/post it is in reply to
      (b) Contain as complete a statement of my life philosophy as possible
      (c) Assume that everyone but me is dumb and needs to have the simplest things explained to them ;)
    14. Re:Linux kernel did not need GCC/GNU/RMS by GC · · Score: 2

      quite... my question is...

      Which compiler built the first version of GCC?

      Which compiler build that compiler's first version?

      You can apply the same to an operating system kernel. That is what makes both very remarkable accomplishments, especially considering their success and abundance today.

    15. Re:Linux kernel did not need GCC/GNU/RMS by ArmedGeek · · Score: 2, Funny

      mmmm...MIT/Stallman...sort of rolls off the tongue, doesn't it.

      --
      Work is punishment for failing to procrastinate effectively.
    16. Re:Linux kernel did not need GCC/GNU/RMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by not creating a monolithic kernel, which has been old fashioned for ten years or so. the future lies in microkernels.

    17. Re:Linux kernel did not need GCC/GNU/RMS by aed · · Score: 1
      the future lies in microkernels.

      Well, with the Hurd, it seems to be more like the microkernel lies in the future :)
    18. Re:Linux kernel did not need GCC/GNU/RMS by Unknown+Lamer · · Score: 2

      The Hurd works. The Hurd now has pthreads and can run almost all of the software that Debian has. You can install Debian GNU/Hurd NOW. And it works. The next cd images should have GNOME and KDE too. The Hurd is a bit slow, but that should be fixed when l4hurd is ready (Hurd on L4, which is much faster than Mach). The Hurd is quite mature and stable and only has a few show stoppers left (fs size limit is the main one). Most of the recent critical bugs have been in GNUMach not in the Hurd. This is because Mach is generally agreed to suck which is why the Hurd is being ported to L4 (a decent microkernel).

      To clarify: the Hurd running on GNUMach 1.x isn't very stable. But that is because GNUMach is unstable, not the Hurd. The Hurd (being a set of daemons and translators) doesn't have too many crash bugs. If any parts of the Hurd has a crash bug it isn't really terribly severe because the server can always be restarted. But when the kernel has a crash bug, oops. It will be nice when GNU finally releases GNU 1.0 (the GNU project will be releasing its own distribution of the GNU OS when it is ready, just like other OS vendors).

      --

      HAL 7000, fewer features than the HAL 9000, but just as homicidal!
    19. Re:Linux kernel did not need GCC/GNU/RMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I honestly spent five minutes talking myself out of using that comment as my sig from now on.

  6. Recognition by EpsilonFour · · Score: 1

    It's nice to see people like Linus get credited for their work for the betterment of society. It's a shame I don't know Dutch. :-)

    1. Re:Recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's nice to see people like Linus get credited for their work for the betterment of society."

      I'm sure that's why Linus did it.
      It couldn't have been out of spite.

  7. I'd have read it but... by mrseigen · · Score: 3, Offtopic

    ... Flash is the most horribly evil thing ever to come out of the computer industry. It chokes the flow of free information and turns pages (of information) into giant full-screen animated talking commercials.

    That rant's over for now, so I'll just have to ask for somebody to get a text list or something. :)

    1. Re:I'd have read it but... by kungfuBreaks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I beg to differ. Sure, Flash can be annoying but so can yellow text on a pink background. There's a time and a place for Flash; just because something has the capacity to be used for Evil(TM) doesn't mean it has no legitimate applications.

    2. Re:I'd have read it but... by Apreche · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Flash is a tool, it is not in itself evil or good. I mean sure, flash brings us crap like well, the ads on www.weather.com.

      It also brings us www.homestarrunner.com.

      If you think I'm going to give up strongbad's e-mail in order to "unchoke the flow of free information" or to get rid of a few ads you've got another thing coming. Besides flash works on almost any device so I don't see how it chokes the flow, if it can flow anywhere.

      --
      The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    3. Re:I'd have read it but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I agree with the parent. This site is great for people with unlimited bandwidth, but I'm on a fucking dialup connection. I would have posted an insightful response, but I couldn't even get to the list.

    4. Re:I'd have read it but... by Elbereth · · Score: 1

      I know this is horribly off-topic, but I just wanted to say that it's possibly to have both Homestar Runner and no flash ads. Just delete the flash plug-in from Mozilla (if you even bothered to install it), then use IE to load those few good web sites (ie, Homestar Runner and... uhhh...) that use Flash. Or, if you don't want to use IE, simply keep a backup copy of Mozilla around that has Flash enabled (install it in your home directory).

    5. Re:I'd have read it but... by Yokaze · · Score: 2

      > Besides flash works on almost any device.

      Does it work on text-to-speech or braille.
      Is it adjustable for colour-blindness?
      Is it indexable/searchable?
      How do I set a bookmark at a certain point in Flash?
      (I'm aware that you wrote almost)

      > It also brings us www.homestarrunner.com.

      Yes, very informative.

      So, what kind of information do you think one cannot convey through the internet by the means of text and pictures, but through Flash-media?

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    6. Re:I'd have read it but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's not the fact that there is some type of information that can't be conveyed without flash. Given flash is really good at only one type of media. That being vector animation. But it's aesthetically pleasing. Is it wrong for something to just be nice to look at?

      And this is getting WAY offtopic here, mod down yo.

    7. Re:I'd have read it but... by Anonymous+Cowtard · · Score: 2

      I believe the problem here is that you, like most of the Slashdot crowd, equate the Internet only with "information." You're leaving out entertainment, which Homestarrunner falls under for many of us (disregarding those inevitable people who will say something along the lines of "I don't find it entertainment" and believe that makes it so for all).

    8. Re:I'd have read it but... by Mac+Degger · · Score: 2

      Try doing maps in text only format. You'll find that flash can be a very handy tool when your information is vision based...as a hell of a lot of information is.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    9. Re:I'd have read it but... by G27+Radio · · Score: 2

      So, what kind of information do you think one cannot convey through the internet by the means of text and pictures, but through Flash-media?

      Everything important in life I learned from Jake. A true American hero.

      Don't let the .exe and .hqx formats fool you, it's Flash, but in self-extracting format in order to conserve bandwidth.

    10. Re:I'd have read it but... by superwai · · Score: 1

      It is all about choosing the right tool for the right application. Using the wrong tool to implement an application will certainly lead to failure. It is the responsibility of a developer to understand what tools are good for certain application. Flash has its own target customers. It certainly open the door for many other differnt kind of applications that weren't possible in the past. That's also the reason why there are many different programming languages existed these days.

    11. Re:I'd have read it but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "There's a time and a place for Flash..."

      - Time: forever
      - Place: /dev/null

      \\k

    12. Re:I'd have read it but... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "... Flash is the most horribly evil thing ever to come out of the computer industry. It chokes the flow of free information and turns pages (of information) into giant full-screen animated talking commercials."

      Oh geez. Talk about misappropriation of blame.

      Flash is not the problem. It's the content makers. Your beef is with them. Flash is just a tool. It is a very sophisticated tool, but like with 3D rendering, not everybody is a star with it. It's just like pop-ups. Nobody's yelling at Microsoft or Netscape because of their popup support, they're yelling at the people who abuse them.

    13. Re:I'd have read it but... by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 2

      Flash is a tool, it is not in itself evil or good.

      If Flash is not evil, then how do you:

      a) Cut and paste text out of a flash page, say: a phone number? (Yes, I've been facted with that problem more than once.)

      b) Turn off the animation?

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    14. Re:I'd have read it but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, cause something with missing features is evil right? Turn off the animation? Are you a moron! FLASH IS ANIMATION. IT'S PURPOSE IS ANIMATION. Flash is a program which lets you create vector graphic ANIMATION for the web. It's relatively small in size and high in quality. Arg! I've got to write a journal entry tommorow about you flash hating dick lickers.

    15. Re:I'd have read it but... by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Who said the choice was text-only or Flash? There's a middle ground, for properly alt-tagged images in fully documented formats like jpeg.

    16. Re:I'd have read it but... by Mac+Degger · · Score: 2

      There goes your dynamic zoom, then, I'd say.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    17. Re:I'd have read it but... by Yokaze · · Score: 2

      > I believe the problem here ...
      Well, I don't consider this as a problem :).

      But to quote from the post you were replying to:
      >>> It chokes the flow of free information and turns pages (of information) into giant full-screen animated talking commercials.
      And your reply:
      >> I don't see how it chokes the flow,

      Entertainment is a different story.
      I won't deny that Homestarrunner is entertaining and flash can generate pretty amusing pages and good looking ones.

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    18. Re:I'd have read it but... by Da+Masta · · Score: 2

      If Flash is not evil, then how do you:

      a) Cut and paste text out of a flash page, say: a phone number? (Yes, I've been facted with that problem more than once.)

      The same way you cut and paste out of non-evil jpgs / pngs / gifs (take your pick).

      b) Turn off the animation?

      By not downloading the plugin? Surely you won't need it of it's all evil.

    19. Re:I'd have read it but... by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 2

      "If Flash is not evil, then how do you:

      a) Cut and paste text out of a flash page, say: a phone number? (Yes, I've been facted with that problem more than once.)"

      The same way you cut and paste out of non-evil jpgs / pngs / gifs (take your pick).

      In other words, you don't know how. Well until you can do that, flash is evil, sorry. Note that very few web designers are stupid enough to place site text in gifs, even though the gif will typically look a lot better. Why? Because it annoys users not to be able to select+copy the text. However, the allure of flash animation is such that any such nicety goes out the window, hence we have a proliferation of pretty animated sites with marginal functionality. This could be fixed, after all, it is possible to pick and manipulate objects out of even 3D animations. But not without coordinated development effort and recognition of the problem. It's the "coordinated" part that I don't see happening with Flash.

      "b) Turn off the animation?"

      By not downloading the plugin? Surely you won't need it of it's all evil.

      And conversely, if I don't download the plugin because animation can't be disabled, then Flash is evil, right?

      Anyway, the correct answer to (b) is "Run Mozilla", because Mozilla lets you control Flash animation, even if you have to crawl through a few menus to do it. So we are down to one reason for Flash being evil. I could add more of course, but they would not necessarily be related to basic functionality. Actually, I like the overall concept and I like the compactness, it's a welcome relief from the "size doesn't matter" mantra of the XML mafia. However, given a choice between compactness and the other benefits XML, SVG etc offer, I'll take the latter, thanks. Perhaps Flash does have a role to play in the web ecology, beyond pacification of refugee couch potatoes, or perhaps it will prove to be more like the VESA local bus, a stopgap solution that took over the world for a while, then was replaced by a more carefully thought out standard.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  8. Right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad RMS or Saint Ignuciuis he wasn't chosen, even though he was recommended.

    Yeah, because everyone loves a fanatic.

  9. Don't you have to be dead to be canonized? by Ted_Green · · Score: 5, Funny

    If so, then does does that make this a hit list too?

    1. Re:Don't you have to be dead to be canonized? by docbrown42 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't you have to be dead to be canonized?

      Nope, just a cannon. They do it in the circus all the time...

      --
      Ed Wedig
      Graphic design services
      docbrown.net
    2. Re:Don't you have to be dead to be canonized? by Snoopy77 · · Score: 1

      Didn't you see the recent documentary 'Swordfish' where Linus is killed. He's dead man :(

      --
      "She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
  10. St. Alphonzo's Pancake Breakfast by RabidOverYou · · Score: 2, Funny

    They left out Frank Zappa!

    1. Re:St. Alphonzo's Pancake Breakfast by pmacwill · · Score: 1

      but luckily they got Van Morrison Tiger Woods and Robert Redford. I was going to completely discount the list until I saw Redford, and what a humanitarian Woods is. Don't forget Bruce Springsteen either because like the site says, "Het gevoel van de USA"

      worst slashdot article ever.
      unsubscribe

    2. Re:St. Alphonzo's Pancake Breakfast by ContemporaryInsanity · · Score: 1

      And Bill Hicks !

  11. Schroeder should have gotten consideration by Microsift · · Score: 1

    It's one thing being Lucy's brother, but Schroeder had to deal with her always coming on to him. Sheesh, how many times does a guy have to say he's not interested before the girl takes the hint?

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
    1. Re:Schroeder should have gotten consideration by Queelix · · Score: 1

      >> Can someone tell me why this guy
      >> [slashdot.org] hates me.

      "I'll give you five reasons..."

  12. Damned plugins by caluml · · Score: 2

    I can't even read the list.
    All I get is a huge grey block in the middle of a black screen.

    1. Re:Damned plugins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My huge block is white. How can I upgrade to a grey block!?!?!

  13. BONO?! by Raul654 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh my lord... what were they think...err, drinking?

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
    1. Re:BONO?! by mrkurt · · Score: 2

      Yeah, haven't we seen him hang out with Billg?

      --
      Always look on the briight side of life! (whistle, whistle)
    2. Re:BONO?! by Fyz · · Score: 1

      The Netherlands... what were they SMOKING?

    3. Re:BONO?! by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bono has actually done a HUGE amount of work to save small countries from financial collapse. He meets with government officials in the USA (and now a few other big countries too, although I can't recall which ones), and persuades them to forgive billions upon billions of dollars in debt. Because of Bono, some small counties have been able to remain in existence.

    4. Re:BONO?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why he sponsors Copyright extension acts, right?

      Not to take away from the good stuff he did that you mentioned, but he's not 100% perfect and good.

    5. Re:BONO?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Useless.
      He basically persuaded your local store owner to forgive a homeless, drug-addicted man his little debt in the store.
      Guess, how fast this drunk will come back asking for more handouts ?
      Bono, while he might think he is helping out, is doing actually nothing worthwhile.
      The real heros are the ones who understand how the economy works and what makes countries prosper.
      But that obviously requires some brains not to mention not being nearly sexy enough.

    6. Re:BONO?! by girish · · Score: 1

      I think its a little different when it comes to countries. He has also done a lot of work for AIDS and other "good" causes. Countries can't really be compared to drunks, I'm not sure how you actually came up with your anology.

    7. Re:BONO?! by dnewlander · · Score: 1
      Sorry, but I have to comment on this.

      Bono went on a tour of Africa with [now-former] US Secretary of the Treasury Paul O'Neill earlier this year, to promote his [Bono's] debt-relief goals. AFAIK, the only result of this tour was a slight swaying of O'Neill's beliefs away from an "all debtor countries must repay their loans" stance.

      In most cases, actual debt relief depends on the World Bank or International Monetary Fund, which are not [quite] US governmental agencies.

      Claiming that Bono has extended the very existence of any countries is a bit of an exaggeration. He has made a lot of noise, though. [Moderators: Know at least one or two facts before falling for this type of stuff.]

      If you really want to help those countries facing huge debt repayments, why don't you send them some money directly, rather than engaging a middle-aged rock star to petition Western governments to take even more tax dollars from the rest of us on their behalf? I don't know about you, but I work for my money.

    8. Re:BONO?! by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 2
      Know at least one or two facts before falling for this type of stuff.

      You ought to take your own advice. You cite only 1 recent event as a way to discount Bono's efforts, but conveniently ignore the fact that he's done dozens of events like this over the past ten years, and some have indeed resulted in huge amounts of debt relief. Happily, KRO has obviously done more research than you have, and found Bono's contributions substantial and real enough to warrant being on the list.

    9. Re:BONO?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      der nederlands, its obvious what they were smoking.

    10. Re:BONO?! by dnewlander · · Score: 1
      I know Bono has been actively campaigning on behalf of debt relief for a while now, and his actions have resulted in some limited forms of debt relief for a few countries.

      But your claim that "dozens" of countries are in existence because of Bono is outright wrong. I like the guy, and his heart is in the right place, but his main impact has been in raising awareness of the debt problems of many countries, not in resolving those issues.

      Again, if you truly believe debt relief is the major issue, feel free to send them money, or to the IMF and World Bank on their behalf. Just leave my taxes out of it.

      May Peace be with you this Christmas.

    11. Re:BONO?! by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 2
      But your claim that "dozens" of countries are in existence because of Bono is outright wrong.

      Where did I claim that?

    12. Re:BONO?! by dnewlander · · Score: 1
      You're right, I did misquote you. I apologize for that.

      You did say, however, that "[b]ecause of Bono, some small counties have been able to remain in existence."

      Name one.

      I'm not saying Bono's not a great guy, and he's certainly taken on a lot of philanthropic activities. But I believe you've exaggerated his accomplishments in this particular area.

  14. Yet another Linux gets installed currently.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The number of my Linux boxes is increasing. Thanks Linus and everybody else who has participated!

  15. Re:Visual Studio .NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps when (if) you grow up and move out of your parents' basement you will come to the realization that Microsoft development tools are actually excellent in comparison to the decades old emacs/gcc-in-a-terminal-window shit.

  16. Just ignorance, nothing more by unterderbrucke · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "One of them is Linus Torvalds, chosen for his work in on Linux and 'Open Source'. Too bad RMS or Saint Ignuciuis he wasn't chosen, even though he was recommended."

    The reason for the overlooking of the real developers of Linux such as RMS is the same reason as Tim Berners-Lee is credited with "inventing" the internet, when obvious evidence suggests otherwise. The American public is, at the base, ignorant of computers.
    They think it is possible for only one person to invent the Internet, when geeks like us know the underlying protocols demand more than one inventor.
    It is the same way with Linus and RMS, with RMS creating most of the base for Linux, but since Linus was the original bootloader writer, people assume he "invented" Linux, while overlooking the more important luminaries.

    1. Re:Just ignorance, nothing more by sisukapalli1 · · Score: 2

      Why is the parent a troll? The post was on topic (talks about why RMS was not credited) and quite reasonable (with a couple of explanations of how single individuals get fame for collective efforts).

      Methinks RMS deserves to be much more favourably viewed, if not for his philosophy (it is very revolutionary even today) or his social contributions (FSF), at least for his technical contributions (emacs, gcc, the whole GNU toolset).

      Modding the parent as troll is very unfair.

      S

    2. Re:Just ignorance, nothing more by leandrod · · Score: 2
      > The American public is, at the base, ignorant of computers.

      This is not about computers, but culture in general and History in particular. History of computing, but bigger than computers and yet not technical at all.

      BTW, has nothing to do with the Americas in general or the USNA in particular, as this is a Dutch site without even an English version.

      > Linus was the original bootloader writer

      He, he was not only the bootloader writer, he is the kernel writer and maintainer. The bootloaders are called LILO or GRUB, not Linux.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    3. Re:Just ignorance, nothing more by kalidasa · · Score: 2

      No one says Tim Berners-Lee invented the Internet. I've never seen any media claim TBL invented the Internet. Everyone says, rightly, that he invented the World Wide Web (though I don't think they understand what that means, that he invented the set of protocols used by web browsers and web servers).

      Besides, everyone knows that Al Gore invented the Internet.

      In all seriousness, you've got everyone and his brother claiming to have invented the Internet, when what matters is who invented TCP/IP.

      It is the same way with Linus and RMS, with RMS creating most of the base for Linux, but since Linus was the original bootloader writer, people assume he "invented" Linux, while overlooking the more important luminaries.

      I think the Linux kernel is a lot more than a bootloader. Hurd was taking forever, and folks decided to try LT's Linux kernel with GNU's tools. And thus GNU/Linux was born.

    4. Re:Just ignorance, nothing more by kalidasa · · Score: 2
      The poster implied that all Linus Torvalds contributed to GNU/Linux was a bootloader. Seems quite trollish to me. How many years would free software have been held back if it had to wait for Hurd to be ready for prime time? There could be no Linux (or GNU/Linux) without GNU; but until quite recently GNU would have been just a bunch of free tools for non-free operating systems (or the free BSDs) without Linux.

      Maybe eventually Hurd will displace Linux, maybe eventually the *BSDs will displace them both; but for now, Linux + GNU is the crown jewel of Open Source.

    5. Re:Just ignorance, nothing more by operagost · · Score: 2
      In all seriousness, you've got everyone and his brother claiming to have invented the Internet, when what matters is who invented TCP/IP.
      I don't agree. The internet ran well for decades on NCP before its size required a more robust protocol.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    6. Re:Just ignorance, nothing more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone else put it well so I'll quote him: "Fair or not, RMS the extremist cannot be separated from RMS the coder. And that limits the appeal of RMS the coder."

      RMS's philosophy is idiotic and his zealism and fanatasism makes him unqualified for any award except for "Most likely to botch a good idea by going crazy"

    7. Re:Just ignorance, nothing more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with RMS creating most of the base for Linux

      He does write some code, but nowhere near that much. Most of the base for Linux was written by a rather large assortment of people.

      With the Linux kernel, Linus has written far more code than RMS has. If you're trying to measure work done and deeds accomplished, RMS is almost negligable in his importance. The GNU toolset was almost entirely written by other people using his philosophy.

      Linus did indeed invent Linux, did the gruntwork to make it happen, and is unquestionably the most important person associated with Linux.
      RMS invented GNU, but as most of his efforts are with evangelism and not actually bringing his invention to fruition, so I'm not even certain he's truly the most important person associated with GNU.

    8. Re:Just ignorance, nothing more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Methinks you are a duplicate account, fucker.

    9. Re:Just ignorance, nothing more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The American public is, at the base, ignorant of computers.
      And that's why Microsoft is so successful, they write OS's for the computer ignorant to use and enjoy, and we have lot of those around!

    10. Re:Just ignorance, nothing more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be VT hawkeye, the post right above yours that you've used in place of your own because you lack language skills.

    11. Re:Just ignorance, nothing more by jnana · · Score: 1

      Ummm, nobody says Berners-Lee invented the Internet (no Al Gore joke here, keep it moving). He invented the World Wide Web, meaning http and html and the first web browser, which was a browser/editor hybrid (the only way to access the WWW at first). Btw, your link is broken.

    12. Re:Just ignorance, nothing more by XO · · Score: 1

      I don't think RMS has really had all that much to do with Linux. RMS happened to have written a lot of very handy tools that were good replacements for the "standard" Unix tools - The GNU tools. Rather than Linus write his own toolset, he took the free ones that RMS had offered.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  17. Guido! by josephgrossberg · · Score: 1

    Guido van Rossum, creator of Python, is my hero.

    And he's Dutch to boot!

    How'd KRO overlook a homegrown hero like that? ;)

    1. Re:Guido! by PD · · Score: 1

      A prophet is never welcome in his own country.

  18. Left off the list... by JZ_Tonka · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I'm sure we can all recognize the accomplishments and contributions of certain excluded individuals that warrant at least an honorable mention. Truly an online legend.

    At the very least, he contributed largely to the QA-ing of Slashcode ;)

    1. Re:Left off the list... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      mr goatse didn't contribute to slashdot QA, trolls did/do. I mean, how hard is it to check where a link goes before clicking on it?


      However, trolls can be commended for page widening, javascript-in-the-comments, and some other stuff, too!

    2. Re:Left off the list... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may be right about the QA part, but he sacrificed his own ass (and probably his health, to a certain degree) for the sake of giving Slashdotters something... unusual... to look at to break up the rantings of frothing open sores zealots. For that I will be eternally grateful.

  19. i wonder by k3v0 · · Score: 1

    is ENIAC on there? I cant read dutch and the site is already /. ed

  20. How can you argue with them by syntap · · Score: 1

    If they include David Bowie on the same list?

    Maybe they'll make the next Red Hat codename "Ziggy" in honor of the list!

  21. Bird by WPIDalamar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Go Linus!

    I always knew he rocked, that's why I named my cockatiel after him!

    I also named my fish after Alan Cox... but the fish died, so no wonder he didn't make the list :)

    1. Re:Bird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's sort of sad in a way. Maybe you should get out of the house more often. Maybe get a girlfriend? Read a book about something other than computers? Do something besides play video games?

  22. "modern" saint? by tswinzig · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can hear RMS now... "you should refer to Linus as a GNU/Hero."

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
    1. Re:"modern" saint? by johnalex · · Score: 2

      Finally - a story that matches your sig.

      --
      JA
      http://www.johnalex.org/
    2. Re:"modern" saint? by JordanH · · Score: 1

      GNU/Linus

    3. Re:"modern" saint? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "I can hear RMS now... "you should refer to Linus as a GNU/Hero."

      Dude... that inspired me to create a comic book.

      "I am Default Man! Watch how quickly I can install software! OkOkOkOkOkOk done!"

  23. Open source hero weenie. by grub · · Score: 2


    I want the pattern to his superhero outfit released so I can see how I stack up.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  24. RMS - movie hero? by FyRE666 · · Score: 2

    I still think RMS should have pushed to get a cameo role in one of the LOTR films... Might need some makeup to look more believable, but you know, they can work miracles these days...

  25. Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They put irrelevant noise like some transsexual or pawns like Walesa and ommited such giants like Thatcher or Reagan.

    1. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They put irrelevant noise like some transsexual or pawns like Walesa and ommited such giants like Thatcher or Reagan.

      Giant assholes, maybe.

    2. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *applauds* Sir, I salute you. An excellent reply.

  26. Steve Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steve Jobs is also on that list.

  27. Michael Jackson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a crying shame Michael Jackson isn't there, that his greatness is overshadowed by the ridiculous American media treatment.

    This is one of most goddamn talented artists I've ever seen. His speed and artistry in his performances is simply unrivalled. He can prance about like the devil *and* sing live at the same time. His vocal abilities span more than mere singing. His compositional and production talents and ability to reproduce instruments bodily are astounding.

    Truly inhuman.

    "Butterflies!"

  28. Also in there... by delphi125 · · Score: 2

    Bruce Springsteen, Bill Cosby, George Harrison, Wim Kok (ex Dutch PM), Pim Fortuijn (ex literally), Mothers (yes, Mothers), Steven Spielberg and Kelly van der Veer (a trans-sexual photo model) as well as 330 other Dutch semi-famous or unknown people, and half a dozen worthwhile people, such as MLK, Danny Kaye and Nelson Mandela (also Steve Biko). Oh and Oprah and Tiger, too!

  29. Re:RMS - sticks to his convictions...how about you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    My conviction is to use a right tool for the job. I am paid to get results and the best way to ensure that goal is to use the most productive tools. I stick to that.

    RMS is not only an idealist but the most dangerous kind of an idealist: a fanatic. And like any fanatic, he does not accept any other way of life than the one he personally preaches and he is not afraid to express that. That's what bugs me.

  30. So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's Theo in all this?

    1. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What's the opposite of a saint?

      That's the list where that sociopathic fucktard belongs.

  31. how is this news? by Axeus · · Score: 0

    ive known that for a long time.
    next headline: "Experts say GNU/Linux doesn't suck."
    thank you slashdot, now i can sleep at night

  32. the anti-hero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linus has set back the state of computing by 10 years with linux. BSD is availble in source format and much better than linux.

  33. Click here to get the plugin by dcuny · · Score: 1
    I thought I was supposed to be redirected to a page with something useful on it, not a freaking advertisment for Flash.

    Maybe there need to be a number of additional warnings included, along with the standard "New York Times, Login Required" disclaimer:

    • Flash required
    • Explorer required
    • WMM required
    • QuickTime required
    Or just a snide Proprietary plugin/codec required, non-Windows losers need not click link.

    The irony is that I am running Windows; it just happens that I'm using Phoenix as my browser. I just don't want to have to download Flash (even if the SWF format is public) in order to see a web page.

    Who took the funny out of my sig?

  34. Oh come on by geek · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Hero as a term is used far to widely nowadays. Linux is a pretty cool guy for doing what he has, but let's face facts here. It's just software, not the cure for cancer.

    RMS got recomended? The guy belongs in a looney bin, not on a list of hero nominees. Any good works RMS has done or continues to do are far outwieghed by his mental disorders. The guy has no respect for anyone or anything that doesn't believe as he does. There was a term for such a person back in the 40's, they called them Nazi's.

    If anyone in the comp industry deserves to be called a hero it's Woz for his work with kids and charity groups.

    1. Re:Oh come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just what the world needs. Charity.

      The only reason charity exists is that it offers loopholes for income tax. :P

    2. Re:Oh come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Godwin's Law is invoked pretty fast around here, no?

    3. Re:Oh come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm offended by your hasty invocation of Godwin's Law in a attempt to trivialize this conversation! .. Good job ;)

    4. Re:Oh come on by glwtta · · Score: 2
      It's just software, not the cure for cancer.

      Hm, I work for a company whose sole raison d'etre is doing just that - finding a cure for cancer. We use Linux extensively, and while we probably could've done without, it does make the whole operation a hell of a lot cheaper (which, for a startup in the current economic climate, does matter quite a bit) and my job somewhat easier (which in the end saves the company money as well).

      The guy belongs in a looney bin, not on a list of hero nominees. Any good works RMS has done or continues to do are far outwieghed by his mental disorders.

      I am afraid I fail to see the connection. Even if he is a satan worshipping misanthrope who kicks puppies just for fun, his works is still his work. Which, one could argue is a bit more infulential than Linus'. Linus created one project, a very large, very successful and very important project, but nonetheless a single project. RMS (arguably) got the whole Free Software thing off the ground in the first place, influencing (directly or indirectly, a lot or a little) every single other free project out there. Oh, and just how much use is the Linux kernel without, let's say, GCC (to pick an example)?

      The guy has no respect for anyone or anything that doesn't believe as he does.

      So? This isn't the "List of People Who Respect Others and are Nice To Their Mothers". I don't believe this is supposed to be some sort of popularity contest.

      This just always gets on my tits; I mean, ok, so you seem to be slightly less of a jerk than RMS is, but are your accomplishments in the same proportion to his?

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    5. Re:Oh come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, he didn't do anything except re-invent the wheel and give it away for free. His success was made on riding the backs of previous innovators. The UNIX system had to be given away, it certainly wasn't getting anywhere on its own merit during the eary 90's. In fact, UNIX was dying off. You could call Linus the Jesus Christ (savior) of UNIX. He, along with the Web saved UNIX's ass!

    6. Re:Oh come on by geek · · Score: 1, Troll

      Could your response have been any more idiotic? Do you use screwdrivers at work? I guess we better make the inventor of the screw driver a hero then. Well actually we should make the guy who invented the tip of the screw driver a hero since metaphoricly speaking that's all Linus did. His contributions pale in comparrsion to those of the rest of the community.

      RMS is a froathing at the mouth loon who does more to hurt free software than to help it. And BTW yes I do think my contributions outweigh his however that is irrelevant to the conversation since I'm not nominated in the award. Nor would I think my efforts on this rock make me a hero.

      "This isn't the 'List of People Who Respect Others and are Nice To Their Mothers'"

      You're joking right? By your definition Sadam is a hero because he's brought some economic relief to his people, nevermind the ones he's killed and tortured.

      Just go away, that was the most ridiculous post I have ever read in my life.

    7. Re:Oh come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the best hero (according to the KRO and me) of 2002 is Charity. She saved two train persons from an attack by 17(!) trainpassengers. She's a real hero! And the dutch hero of 2002!

    8. Re:Oh come on by glwtta · · Score: 2
      Could your response have been any more idiotic?

      Let's try to find out.

      Do you use screwdrivers at work? I guess we better make the inventor of the screw driver a hero then.

      The screwdriver is an important invention and quite essential for many technology oriented fields. However, it can also be considered to be fairly trivial, and there's a good chance that screwdrivers would be invented by someone else had the original inventor never bothered. I am not sure the same can be said about free operating systems / kernels / whatever.

      And BTW yes I do think my contributions outweigh his however that is irrelevant to the conversation since I'm not nominated in the award.

      Fair enough, though I do think they are quite relevant as they give you more of a solid position when attacking RMS.

      By your definition Sadam is a hero because he's brought some economic relief to his people, nevermind the ones he's killed and tortured.

      My definition made the distiction between people's accomplishments and their personalities. Your major problems with RMS seem to be that he is a "loon", is disrespectful of others and apparently prone to frothing. Killing people, on the other hand, is firmly in the realm of "real actions" rather than "attitude towards others".

      Just go away, that was the most ridiculous post I have ever read in my life.

      You have a four digit slashdot id, I refuse to believe that the above statement is true.

      BTW, In that post I didn't actual claim that any one should or shouldn't be on any such list; merely trying to point out some differences in what they've done.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    9. Re:Oh come on by Rooktoven · · Score: 2, Insightful

      His post was dead on. Yours is the one that resorted to invective and name-calling because you weren't able to respond intelligently to his points.

      Stallman's contributions made the free software movement possible. As is stated below, he invented the wheel and gave it away for free. How exactly has Stallman hurt free software? The GNU license is its greatest protector. Unfortunately those who stands by their convictions are often labeled as crazy by those who disagree with them. Such is the case here.

      I think we will find that history will treat Richard Stallman more kindly than he is treated in many contemporary fora. His concept is built to last. (Side note for you Ayn Rand fans-- I was in a conversation where someone asked "Who is the Howard Roark of the software world?". After Bill Gates was shot down, I found some consensus with RMS)

      BTW what free software do _you_ use?

      --

      Acquiescence leads to obliteration
  35. Uh oh, wait until RMS gets ahold of them! by pheph · · Score: 2

    Its GNU/Linus!

  36. Re:RMS - sticks to his convictions.. QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RMS - sticks to his convictions

    So did Hitler.

    So did Mao.

    So did Stalin.

    They also "offered" the world more than most of us ever will.

    At least those figures bathed once in a while, though.

  37. i didn't RTFA, but by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 0

    was there a cowboyneal option?

  38. The hero's now working for PALLADIUM by glMatrixMode · · Score: 3, Interesting

    > Linus Is A Hero

    And today, the hero is working for one of the companies behind Palladium :
    http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=6487

    I posted this on the 'linuxnewbie' forums some time ago, but it curiously disappeared. I've received no mail from the moderators and I've really verified that my message had really been posted. My interpretation is that some linuxnewbie moderator was a Linus fan.

    --
    War doesn't prove who's right, just who's left.
    1. Re:The hero's now working for PALLADIUM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The revolution has been betrayed.

      Linus, once a father of the new way, has now sold himself to the most hated enemy: Propietary Software and fascist control systems.

  39. English Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Linus Torvalds

    Linux Open Source

    Over the last couple of years the free Linux software has become a fierce competitor to Windows. Finnish Linus Torvalds is the hero of the Open Source movement.



    Finnish student Linus Torvalds wrote his first version of Linux in 1991. He asked a number of programmer friends to take a look at his creation and provide comments. This created a collaboration that is still driving continuous improvements to the operating system. By now there is a fixed group of about 1,000 internet users that contiuously tunes Linux.


    Apart from that fixed group there are many more people that provide one-off enhancements. Midnight chat sessions take place to discuss possible additions or enhancements of the collective property. At first, Linux seemed primarily an operating system for hobbyists, mostly employed in academic circles. Towards the end of the nineties Linux started its transition to the data centers of large companies. System administrators would download Linux off the internet for free and started using it in large numbers as web servers (the central computers that host internet sites), often without their superiors knowing. Whenever a problem emerges, this is brought up on internet news groups, at which point tens of thousands of programmers around the world are available to come up with a solution. There is a myriad of advantages to Linux according to the proponents of Open Source. First and foremost this software is free. Contrary to other software there are no license fees and the system can be downloaded from the internet for free.


  40. Why don't we have an award like this in the US? by jdclucidly · · Score: 2

    I'd much rather see "This year's best people" on the cover of Time or People magazine instead of "This year's most scantly-clad." (a la Jennifer Lopez)

    Looking through the pictures on that website, these look like people I would actually like to meet (save the black guy with sunglasses and purple hair) as opposed to the plastic celebrities we're constantly bombarded with by the media in the States.

    1. Re:Why don't we have an award like this in the US? by edbarrett · · Score: 1

      I can understand being fooled into thinking Time is a news magazine, but People?

  41. Stop jumping up and down... by Pooh22 · · Score: 2

    Because looking at the other entries makes me feel the list is not even moderated and doesn't even "comply" with the morals of the Catholic Broadcast Organisation (KRO, but translated). There's one picture of a Turkisch woman ("Nilgün Yerli") with a subscript of "Turkse Troel", which could be considered quite derogatory (near the meaning of "Slut"). Others on the list also don't come close to the "pureness" of a saint, at least not from what I can tell.

    And let's face it, people like Linus as a representative and leader of the kernel development, but I suspect nobody on the kernel mailinglist will call Linus a saint ;-)

    (Sorry to burst your bubble...)

    Simon

    1. Re:Stop jumping up and down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should check out Yerli's own website,
      http://www.turksetroel.nl/, before complaining about that name...

      The definition of 'saint' used by KRO is obviously not as limited as that used by the catholic church - they use it to mean 'people who have done good'. Has Linus done good? I dare say "yes", even if it was accidental, even if RMS would perhaps have been a better choice.

  42. Weird choice by hdparm · · Score: 1
    Do Nelson Mandela and Frederik Willem de Klerk equally deserve to be there?

    Bowie?

    Steve Jobs?

    Plus about 20-25% seem to be Dutch?

    I take it's hard to create totally unbiased list of this sort but this one's just ridiculous.

    1. Re:Weird choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny that so many of them happen to be white too...Hey, let's ignore what most of the world has done...

    2. Re:Weird choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Anonymous Coward!
      Are you saying that most improvements have _not_ been achieved by white people?

      Don't be silly!

    3. Re:Weird choice by op00to · · Score: 2

      Thank god we were born with this really cool thing called "free will". If that free will thingie is in an environment that actually allows it, you can discount lists like this as not important to you. This isn't the end-all be-all of "hero" lists. Since it's made by the Dutch, one would assume them to think more highly of achievements that have affected them more. The list could be ridiculous to you because you may not have the same point of view as the creators of the list. If you don't like the list, don't bitch about it, ignore it (or maybe even better, write your own)!

    4. Re:Weird choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While that wasn't what I was saying, that's another fine point, most of the achievements have not been done by white people!

    5. Re:Weird choice by hdparm · · Score: 1
      or maybe even better, write your own

      Heh, if I had enough time to spare, maybe I'd give it a shot. Perhaps cut a bit on Slashdot postings?

      Seriously, though, list is a bit more Dutch-centric than, given the size of Dutch population, one would think is fair. If, as you say, they wanted to include people that have affected them more, I don't see how did Gandhi or ML King acomplish this.

      That list is weird, I tell you.

  43. The heck you say! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry bro, but I think you're wrong.

    Rocket science is quite easy these days. In fact, I've made my own rocket. Gone are the days of heavy math and perfectly constructed rockets.

    Todays rockets use household items like pringle cans and gasoline. NASA has asked me to show to the world just how easy it is to get to the moon with this simple stuff.

    Making a compiler is MUCH more different than that. Why, just the other day in my business information science class I had to find the Wizard button in Visual Basic in order to make my compiler!

    Now THAT was difficult.

  44. Re:BILL FRIST POST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They all are racists, but Republicans tend to make more gaffes.

  45. 365? by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

    So, what, is it one saint for every day of the year? If so, what day is St. Linus day???

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  46. Mandela and De Klerk BOTH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both of them deserve it for their bravery. Mandela rejected his past embrace of genocidal Stalinism and moved South Africa forward. De Klerk rejected Apartheid and moved South Africa forward.

    Both of them embraced monstrous ideologies earlier in their careers, but unlike the vast majority who embrace the ideologies, Mandela and DeKlerk dumped them for something better.

    1. Re:Mandela and De Klerk BOTH by hdparm · · Score: 1
      Maybe but it takes much greater man to forgive, convince others to forgive and move on than to accept innevitable under the preasure from in and outside.

      Perhaps someone else in De Klerk's position would not be as insightful to accept this as quickly, thus creating unnecessary bloodshed but practicality and common sense do not get one onto my 'Saints list'.

  47. Stallman's humor with the GNU/Linux deal by lizzybarham · · Score: 1

    RMS

    1. Re:Stallman's humor with the GNU/Linux deal by BeeShoo · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'll give him this one. I'll freely admit to being a bit of an RMS basher, but he won a few points with me here. Credit where credit is due...

  48. Linus by archeopterix · · Score: 4, Funny


    A hero.

    Superpowers:

    Kernel strike - takes 10 turns, produces a kernel that combined with a set of GNU tools decreases enemy share on the server market.
    E-mail - takes 0 turns, gives additional activity to every geek character on LKML. This multiplies by 100 if re-posted on Slashdot.
    Flying - well, not yet.

  49. Re:RMS - sticks to his convictions.. QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stalin was just interested in total power he never stuck to any "convictions"...

    Lenin, Trotsky, they did surely...

    But Stalin, Mao, these guys just wanted a restoration of the asiatic mode of production which is not any better than the bourgeois mode of production really.

  50. I know this won't be popular... by goldspider · · Score: 2
    I wasn't able to read the list (big nasty flash ad + 28.8 connection = $#@%%^#$@) but is either Bill Gates or the creator of AOL on that list?

    I know this will probably activate the froth glands of you zealots, but please read this whole post first. I don't know who compiled this list, but I suspect that if those people were left off, it was done so deliberately, despite their obvious contributions to the development of the internet.

    As unpopular as they and their creations are to a lot of people here, I think it's unfair to ignore how they were able to bring the internet to millions of users who, without Windows and/or AOL, would have never been able to do so.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:I know this won't be popular... by kalidasa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As unpopular as they and their creations are to a lot of people here, I think it's unfair to ignore how they were able to bring the internet to millions of users who, without Windows and/or AOL, would have never been able to do so.

      Apple+Prodigy, or Apple+CompuServe, would have done it. AOL's real genius (whether they were Steve Case's ideas, or more likely those of his staff) was making the Internet connection in AOL work more simply than in the other online services, and in coming out with the unlimited connection plan when he did (despite the horrible user experience that led to for the first year or so after the change). Microsoft's real genius wrt the Internet (whether they were Bill Gates's ideas, or more likely those of his staff) was in recognizing the threat that Netscape posed to the Microsoft model and quickly leveraging free code into a "dumped" product (IE 2; don't talk to me about IE 1) that usurped Netscape's place and either per accidens or purposefully (the latter would be more complimentary to Microsoft) integrated the user's experience of the Web and the 'Net with the user's experience of the operating system.

      In some ways, what MS is talking about now is what Sun was talking about 5 years ago. Moving the real work onto the network and off the desktop.

    2. Re:I know this won't be popular... by intermodal · · Score: 2

      "As unpopular as they and their creations are to a lot of people here, I think it's unfair to ignore how they were able to bring the internet to millions of users who, without Windows and/or AOL, would have never been able to do so."

      I'm still not sure that letting millions of ignorant users on was a good idea in the first place. How many times does one have to get AIMs or ICQs of "ASL" or "Come see me and my friends naked XXX" before it becomes obvious that the glorious internet, that sacred educational frontier, has become nothing more than a cesspool where if you know where to go, you can actually find real information? Let's face it, easy access is good, idiot access isn't necessarily good.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    3. Re:I know this won't be popular... by XO · · Score: 1

      Whoa,whoa, WHOA...

      I have NEVER met ANYONE who had EVER thought that Bill or Steve Case (AOL) had had anything to do with any development of the internet. Sure, they brought it ot the masses, but that has nothing to do with development.

      The Internet is not for the masses. The Internet is for the Geeks.

      Created by Geeks, for Geeks. That's it.

      Most all development of anything involving the Internet has happened on Unix systems. Very little has actually happened on the Internet since the creation of the World Wide Web.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    4. Re:I know this won't be popular... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Henry Ford didn't invent the car, but he was great for bringing it to the masses.

  51. Re:RMS - sticks to his convictions...how about you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your "whatever makes me the most cash" approach is why you are posting anonymously to slashdot while people the world over are paying cash to fly in "fanatical" RMS just to hear him speak about Free Software in their country.

  52. 3 of the 4 Beatles by delcielo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ringo got shafted again.

    He isn't as visible as the others; but he's done a lot of post-Beatles work for charity.

    Cheers, Ringo.

    --
    Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
    1. Re:3 of the 4 Beatles by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2

      Ringo got shafted again.

      He isn't as visible as the others; but he's done a lot of post-Beatles work for charity.

      Cheers, Ringo.


      Cheers, Ringo ... ? Ringo, is that you? Do you always speak in the third person?
      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    2. Re:3 of the 4 Beatles by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 2

      Oh it's a Ringo all right, just not THAT Ringo.
      --

    3. Re:3 of the 4 Beatles by supine · · Score: 2

      Lennon quote when asked "Is Ringo the best drummer in the world?":

      "In the world? He's not even the best drummer in the band."

      toodles
      marty

      --
      "I can't buy want I want because it's free. Can't be what they want because I'm me." -Corduroy, Pearl Jam
  53. I hate flash by FattMattP · · Score: 2

    No wonder RMS wasn't chosen. He'd require a plugin to view his details. Can anyone post a non-flash translation?

    --
    Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    1. Re:I hate flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      any site in Flash isn't worth visiting. Therefore, you don't need a translation. If you like, it might help to let the webmaster know that his gay site would benefit from a redesign in something a little bit more useful, like HTML.

  54. You are missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It didn't have to be built with free tools to be free.

    RMS didn't do anything to make Linux happen. He really didn't do anything to make it free (libre) either.

    The only thing RMS's tools did, was make it free as in beer. Linus' choice in compilers wouldn't have changed the license he released the source under. He could have released under a truly unrestrictive license like the BSD license, where people really do have freedom, but he chose the tools and licesne of RMS.

    RMS didn't make anything happen, and Linux has been created using non-gnu tools and compilers.

    1. Re:You are missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux has been created using non-gnu tools and compilers.

      This statement is patently false.
      What kind of nonsense are you spouting?

    2. Re:You are missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux has been created using non-gnu tools and compilers Just like life was created from non-living things.

    3. Re:You are missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux was created with GNU tools - specifically the GCC compiler - end of story.
      Your brain is made from non-living things.

    4. Re:You are missing the point by Sh0t · · Score: 1

      God you people He's saying you can compile linux using NON GNU COMPILERS You people who act like you know so much about "everything" don't usually know anything. Especially you anon people.

    5. Re:You are missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry apologist-boy, but no. "Created with non-gnu compilers" does not mean "can compile with non-gnu compilers".

    6. Re:You are missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People with zeros in their nicks usually fancy themselves some type of eleet hacker whos smart than everyone but is actually a fucking big loser.

      Just because you impressed mommy hax0ring her windows machine no one else gives a flying fuck.

      Just because you are doing an AP intro to C++ class in your shitty little high school also means you know jack squat.

      Chump.

      Go back to trying to install mandrake on your pc ok poser.

  55. Linus in good company... by Queelix · · Score: 1


    "Tamara Rops - Redde kind uit zwembad" my dutch is rusty (sorry mom!) but this roughly translated is "Tamara Rops - saved a child from swimming pool".

    I haven't seen a shout out this long since the Source Hip Hop Music Awards. *Everyone* gets some love from the KRO ya'all...

    1. Re:Linus in good company... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The winner (hero of the year) is a 15-year old girl who jumped into a group of youngsters who were attacking two train conductors...
      While that is very heroic, it isn't exactly sensible.
      (others were killed for doing this in this country)

    2. Re:Linus in good company... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the 15-year young girl was being very sensible. When a _girl_ of _15_ years jumps into a fight, people will notice. And they did! She (Charity) is one brave girl and deserves to be hero of the 2002!

  56. Stallman = -1,troll! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RMS is the Ultimate troll! He really is. Dont belive me? Look at what he has done recently

    * The huge GNU/Linux vs Linux flamewar
    * The HURD for the server fraud
    * This
    * Comic strips promoting hatred to the US goverment!
    * Misusing the word free!

    This is just a small selection of scandals! He has been trolling the academic community for years! A look at his homepage will show that he whines at everything!

    People are starting to realise that the GPL is a FRAUD and are switching to less restrictive licences such as BSD and LGPL licenses. I use linux (not gnu/linux) because its better for MY NEEDS, and I dont wank about with crap like licences.

    Please do NOT nominate him as a famous person as he has trolled the world, this explains everything

  57. Worst...post...ever by Charlie+Bill · · Score: 0, Troll

    1) Its in Dutch.
    2) Babelfish doesn't do Dutch.
    3) RMS is a tool.

    1. Re:Worst...post...ever by TeknoHog · · Score: 2
      > RMS is a tool.

      For those who don't know statistics, RMS is the square Root of the Mean of the Squares in a distribution. It's a great tool for physicists.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:Worst...post...ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more of a method than a tool though, isn't it.

  58. Really Dutch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is /. REALLY sure the source is Dutch? Not German nor Zimbabwian? Considering how /. completely f*** up the story about all Danish schools swiching to linux earlier today (the schools just got offered a cheap/free StarOffice CD - for both windows and linux!). And /. never corrected the head line...

    1. Re:Really Dutch? by ShwAsasin · · Score: 1

      Thats because anything with the words RMS, Linus, or Linux automatic victories in the battle against Bill Gates and Microsoft.

      Not every news clipping is a major milestone in the histroy of linux or open source.

  59. Slow news day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here at /., eh?

    Linus a hero. \/\/hatever.

  60. You're right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a religious.

  61. WOW by oZZoZZ · · Score: 1

    to be on the list with other greats like Bruce Springsteen, Tina Turner and sting.. WOW

  62. Sects, Sects, Sects! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Some of the EMACS vs. vi or GNOME vs. KDE arguments certainly have the flavor of religious schism - we can't even agree whether the name of the Church is pronounced LIE-NUX, LIN-UX, LEE-NOOKS. or GUH-NEW-something.

    SVM, ERGO MONSTRO

    1. Re:Sects, Sects, Sects! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linus pronounces it LIN-UX. You could insist on pronouncing it other ways, but then you'd just be silly.

    2. Re:Sects, Sects, Sects! by sparkz · · Score: 2

      Germans insist on calling their country Deutschland. I still call it Germany. In Britain, it makes more sense, to me, to call it "Lie-nucks." In practice, I do about 50/50.

      --
      Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
    3. Re:Sects, Sects, Sects! by caluml · · Score: 2

      Lie-nucks is definately the American-ised way of saying it. In Britain, the correct way to say it is with a "flat" i, as in lihnuks.
      Which incidentally is closed to the way Linus says it
      Obviously, he has a Swedish accent, so he says it with the longer ee sound, but converting that into UK English, it would go from leenuks, to lihnuks. Lienuks is due to the Americans changing the word - there are some examples of this in other words, but I can't remember them.

    4. Re:Sects, Sects, Sects! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, he has a Swedish accent, ...

      Whatever gave you that idea? Ask any Swede and he'll tell you Linus has a Finnish accent.

  63. OH LINUS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    UR MY HERO!

  64. Re:RMS - sticks to his convictions.. QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot to mention Mahatma Gandhi and Mother Theresa.

  65. Quick Translation by selderrr · · Score: 4, Funny

    (I'm dutch, not english, so forgive spalling errors. CmdrTaco is now verifying syntax & vocaulary :-)


    The free Linux-software developed itself the past few years as a solid comptetitor against Windows. The Fin Linus Torvalds is the hero of the 'open source'- movement.
    The Finse student Linus Torvalds wrote in 1991 a first version of Linux. Torvalds asked a few friend-programmers to have a look at and comment on his creation. Thuswas born a cooperation that still today leads tp continuous improvement of the operating system.
    Meanwhile, there is a core of at least 1000 internetusers continuously polishing linux.
    besides this core, there are many one-time contributions. Thru nightly chat-sessions the discussion about possible additions and improvements of this common good are worked out.
    initially, linux turned out to be an OS for fanatic hobbyists, usualy working in academic situations. At the end of the 90s, linux started rising in computer centers of lartge companies. System administrators download linux for free from the Net and use it 'en masse' as webserver, often without IT managers knowledge.
    If problems come to light, they get notified in newsgroups all over the net, whereafter tenthousands of programmers are volunteering to help finding a solution.
    The advantages of linux are numerous according to open-source fans. Mostly because it is free : in contrast with other software, no licences have to be paid, but rather it is freely downloadable.


    Then they go on an nag about linus being gay, having a goatse affair with CmdrTaco in russia in a base that belongs to someone who has bad grammar (like me). Or something.

    1. Re:Quick Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Then they go on an nag about linus being gay, having a goatse affair with CmdrTaco in russia in a base that belongs to someone who has bad grammar (like me). Or something."

      Ah, you crazy Dutch, with your humor!

    2. Re:Quick Translation by Chicks_Hate_Me · · Score: 1

      Wow! Have you ever considered writing textbooks for Arkansas Public Schools?

      Only kidding, I'm half Dutch and I have terrible grammar. Of course, I've lived in the US all my life and I don't speak a word of Dutch...I guess I'm just stupid.

  66. It makes sense since y'all're by sujan · · Score: 1

    freaks.....

  67. what's next? by mr.+marbles · · Score: 1

    an E! channel list of the top 20 sexiest open source developers.

    1. Re:what's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was this documentary about open source and Linus Torvalds (The Code), earlier this year. You can download it from some places on the net.
      This was very much confirming about the fact that open source developers generally are long-haired, bearded, ugly guys eating pizza behind the keyboard.

  68. how retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'nuf said

  69. But his obnoxiousness overshadows the rest. by VT_hawkeye · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's the classic case of a guy who doesn't know when to keep his mouth shut.

    He'd garner far more respect for his technical contributions if he didn't make us accept his ravings^H^H^H^H^H^Hextreme socio-political opinions as a baseline for talking to him.

    Fair or not, RMS the extremist cannot be separated from RMS the coder. And that limits the appeal of RMS the coder.

    1. Re:But his obnoxiousness overshadows the rest. by kien · · Score: 1
      Fair or not, RMS the extremist cannot be separated from RMS the coder. And that limits the appeal of RMS the coder.


      While I agree with your first statement, I tend to approach the RMS code/philosophy issue differently. To me, the code that RMS produced caused me to give more weight to his arguments. His ideas are truly revolutionary, but I'd hesitate to call him an extremist; I just think he's either 10 years ahead of his time (our society is not ready to accept the concept of totally free information) or he's completely wrong (and DRM will prevail).

      RMS aside, though, I'm happy for Linus.

      --K.
      --
      Sig: Bad people happen. Try to avoid being one of them.
    2. Re:But his obnoxiousness overshadows the rest. by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Not to belittle RMS' accomplishments, but if you see them on film RMS comes off as abrasive and obnoxious (and looking like a scruffy hacker). OTOH Linus has a friendly, simple charm, a humble attitude and makes frequent references to self-deprecating humor. As a result Linus was able to rally a strong community of volunteer developers in a way that RMS never managed to do with his charm.

      As long as we're on religious metaphors, you could say Stallman was John the Baptist to Linus as Jesus.

  70. Re:Visual Studio .NET by ebbomega · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I'm not one to usually feed the trolls, but I think this is a great time to do this wonderful High-level vs. Low-level debate.

    High-level languages can be useful. Visual Studio and the like can serve certain purposes.

    However, there are many cases where it can severely hamper your abilities.

    Let me give you an example. Visual Basic is an extremely high-level language. Very little programming is required for quick and easy programs. It all has hard-wired Access usage (*shudder*) so Databasing is actually pretty simple if you've ever used Microsoft Office and Access and the like.

    However. (This is where the audience says "There's _always_ a however")

    This semester that has most recently come to pass I was involved in a Software Engineering course in which we were given a term-long project to work on in development teams. Each group was 5 people each and picked from 4 different projects what they wanted to do. Our team and another team picked a PocketPC-based Application, based on making an E-guide for a Museum.

    So, the Prototyping phase comes around, and we decide to do a simple throw-away prototype in HTML, which would just generally show how it would work, how it would look, and get customer feedback so as to clarify the requirements for the project.

    The other team decided to do _theirs_ in Visual Basic, with a similar intention: code it in VB, then move on to either Java or C++ or something like that.

    Now, after we finish with that, we say "Great. Let's now start coding this in Java."

    The other team, however, said "Wait a minute... All we really need to do is implement a database into the VB code and spruce it up and boom, we have a working E-guide... this'll save us on a bunch of coding effort. Woohoo!"

    Fast Forward to the end of the semester and we're all giving our presentations.

    Ours is presented, it's slick as hell, really nice Graphical interface, simple, easy to use and looks really really nice, and it was entirely coded using text editors.

    The other team presents, and theirs is pretty dull (I really don't want to shoot it down, cuz the people were really nice... but it was). The interface was a clunky windows UI which loses a lot of the ease-of-use that was required for the project. Heavy on the pull-down menus and the like, obviously making good use of the Visual Basic toolkit.

    This basically gives contrast to those people who shoot down on Assembler purists who tell the story of the brilliant yet misguided hacker who makes a graphics engine in Assembler based on physical principles of matter, and spending an entire night making a slick and efficient wireframe animation of a spaceship flying across the screen, and then the C++ hacker makes, in one hour, an incredibly beatiful animation of a ship flying over Mars and around the moon and the like...

    So my point is, yeah, High Level is nice, but going too high a level starts hampering your useability.

    --
    Karma: Non-Heinous
  71. Why Saint Ignuciuis didn't make the cut. by zerofoo · · Score: 2

    No one wanted to listen to him sing this

    -ted

    1. Re:Why Saint Ignuciuis didn't make the cut. by GC · · Score: 2

      omg... how stupid... is there any other "culture" type stuff associated with GNU/Music?

      Stick to producing great software like GCC and give up on the music front. !PLEASE!!!

  72. Very Good by Malicious · · Score: 1

    This could help our Australian friends a great deal!
    If Linus is a Saint, he could claim that he is also of the Jedi religion, and be the first 'Jedi Master'

    --
    01101001001000000110000101101101001000000110001001 10000101110100011011010110000101101110
  73. Re:RMS - sticks to his convictions...how about you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Looks like you have trouble comprehending what you read. If I were after money like you allege, do you think I would bother investing in quality development tools and libraries?

    There is a thing called professionalism: I deliver quality products on time and at a reasonable price. If a proprietary tool (compiler, library or IDE) helps me to improve the quality and cut the development time of my product, I will invest in it. I will not let my client down by trying to get by with half-baked free solutions or re-invent the wheel (and waste time debugging algorithms other people have already perfected) just to avoid using the "evil" proprietary software.

    But then again I suppose you Stallmanists don't care about quality. The idea of someone actually having clients is probably akin to an unpardonable sin to you. What a way to make friends and gain influence...

    People actually paying to hear RMS talk really reminds me of a cult.

  74. Ann Van Elsen by oscrmyer · · Score: 1

    While I was happy to see Linus made the list. Alas my day was made when I saw Ann van Elsen made the list. While I really have no idea who she is. She is hot so that does have to count for something :-D

    1. Re:Ann Van Elsen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Groten.

    2. Re:Ann Van Elsen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ann Van Elsen was last years Miss Belgium. She refused to go to the Miss World election in Nigeria out of protest against the death sentence against some woman. She's hot, but has a strong mind of her own ;-)

  75. Shouldn't that be... by erroneus · · Score: 2

    GNU/Linus or GNU/Torvalds? After all, wasn't it RMS who donated all the semen to the FSF (Free Sperm Foundation)? I think we all have a lot to be thankful for in GNU.

  76. Re:RMS - sticks to his convictions.. QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's tough to be critical of Mother Theresa, but Gandhi is overrated. If Hitler had been on a crusade to exterminate all natives of India like he did the jews, would he have just layed down and let them fire up the ovens?

    Or worse, would he have just layed down, let them start slaughtering everyone, and then wait for other nations to come in and sacrifice their own lives to save them?

    Gandhi got lucky, because he was battling the british empire that had a basic morality. Gandhi's philosophy itself, however, was fundamentally immoral.

  77. Not so sure he knows what he is talking about... by kitsch · · Score: 1

    While Linus is nice it seems that most of the voting was done in terms of popularity. If I recall quite a few saints were fairly unpopular in thier times or rather eccentric. Quite a few only reciving recognition well after thier deaths. I would definitly say that RMS fits the bill much more than some others. I'd have to say that popularity is probabaly the least likely reason a saint would be picked. A good thought though. Certainly saints can and shold be picked outside of purely religious contexts.

  78. And the winner is!!! by Queelix · · Score: 1


    Based on the votes accumulated by the KRO site this woman is beating out the competition for supreme hero of 2002! Apparently she laid the smack down on some rowdies at a train station on the mean streets of Apeldoorn. My hero!

    Story follows from the Google cache...

    Almelo, January 17, 2002. Actually she'd like to be an actress, but after last weekend she's not so sure anymore. The police see a good agent in her and the NS would also like her as a ticket-taker. Charity, a mavo student from Almelo, was showered with flowers, gift certificates and a pair of earrings from the mayor. "He was really proud of me."

    Staying past the time set to leave for school, everyone wanted to hear exactly what happened last Sunday in the train between Amersfoort and Apeldoorn. Charity (who doesn't want her last name revealed for fear of reprisals), traveled alone, after going out in Amsterdam. People in the train car were bothered by a group of 17 boys coming from a boarding school in Voorst. "Pestering, swearing and smoking marijuana," said Charity," And if you looked at them, they got angry." When the train stopped in Apeldoorn, a fight broke out between two ticket-takers and the boys. The ticket-takers, who had spoken to the boys about their behavior, were pushed to the ground, punched and kicked. Charity could see through the window that none of the bystanders were intervening, including the men dressed in green military clothing.

    "I dialed 112 and then jumped in without thinking. 'Stop! Let them go!' I screamed." Charity was also struck with a few blows, but it worked and the group separated. The police managed to detain five of the attackers, and the day after apprehended one more. The remaining ringleaders are under house arrest at their boarding school, Charity was told.

    Others talked about her heroic status, but Charity herself thinks that her taking action was the most normal thing to do. "I always stand up for others." But this time she was even more motivated through a discriminatory remark made by an older woman who was also sitting in the train. "It's always those dirty blacks," remarked the woman." "I wanted to show that not everyone who has skin of color misbehaves," said Charity, daughter of a Dutch mother and Surinam father. "Charity can't ignore injustice, it's in her genes," said Charity's mother, Chantal. "Teasing, bothering, Charity always defends the victim."

    She also notices that she's the target of regular discrimination because of her skin color. Last summer, Charity was beaten up at the station in Rijssen by a few girls who apparently took issue with the skirt she was wearing. "If you've ever gone through it, then you don't want others to have to go through it. So I knew how the ticket-takers felt." The blows she got in Apeldoorn at the station led to some swelling, but she doesn't feel them anymore. She is more bothered by all the attention she's getting. At the police station, there remain two lists of names of people who want to hear her story.

    1. Re:And the winner is!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird, I was on the same train and I did not notice anything happening....

  79. Where's Ringo? by burgburgburg · · Score: 2

    Let me get this straight: George, John and even Paul are heroes/saints but Ringo is chopped liver? I realize that the others did more noble things post-Beatles, but come on. Ringo did "Caveman", with Barbara Bach, Dennis Quaid AND Shelly Long.

    1. Re:Where's Ringo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. He also did a silly Japanese commercial for apple juice. "ringo" means apple in Japanese so they took advantage of that. Pretty funny.

  80. Hrm, by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sure, I respect Linus for his work and contributions to the IT world and the "liberation" from propertairy software and unethical licenses. However, the REAL heroes on that page are two victims of "zinloos geweld" as we dutch people call it, or "senseless violence" if translated into english. These two people I'm talking about are René Steegmans and Meindert Tjoelker (both on the same page as Linus) who were killed for no reason at all. Maybe not such a big thing in the US, but remember that the Netherlands is about 1/232th the size of the US. (according to the CIA factbook, ahem) Meindert Tjoelker was killed when trying to calm a fight between a few people and René Steegmans was killed when he questioned a bunch of guys wether they had any respect for an old lady who they almost ran over on scooters. They are real heroes to us Dutchies.

    1. Re:Hrm, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First off, I've never heard of them so they're probably irrelevent to history. Second off, it really does amaze me sometimes when I think about how small most European nations are. Most of our states are bigger than many European countries. That's just hilarious! :-) You Europeans also have the nerve to put *US* down? You pissant little Eurotrash fucknuts. We could crush you without any effort. Be glad our attention is set elsewhere or Europe would be a smoking parking lot.

    2. Re:Hrm, by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1

      You're new to trolling aren't you? Try harder next time. Oh, and don't be an AC, you'll never get famous with that.

    3. Re:Hrm, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fee fi fo fum, I smell an American. Be careful, or us Canadians will annex your pitiful, backwater nation.

    4. Re:Hrm, by spieters · · Score: 1

      The whole senseless violence thing is totally ot here if you ask me (another dutch person). Pretty much all the people on that list are heroes, and I for one don't see why those two would be any more of a hero than Linus, RMS, or perhaps some guy that stopped 20 fights and didn't get killed or was never shown on tv. In other words, speak for yourself please, other "dutchies" might have totally different ideas about heroes...

      --
      Instant Karma's gonna get you Gonna look you right in the face -- John Lennon
    5. Re:Hrm, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Maybe I am wrong but...
      I've the idea that the US is only busy with Saddam.
      And while here in Holland the Cristmas thoughts goes out to the people in South Ethopie.
      And the only food in the US what goes out to Afrika is genetic modified..
      Here in Holland , we are brainwashed with the American (Dream).
      McD, Eninem , Bush, Bill...
      I can't even imaging Americans like those.
      In the US they also don't play dutch gabberhouse on the radio.
      Don't get me wrong , I love BSD which is also from the US =)

      We don't want another war.

    6. Re:Hrm, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      N*** Amerika....
      I wished columbus had never dicovered it.
      Or the vikings.
      It's time a native american becomes president

    7. Re:Hrm, by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1

      Yes, but some other "dutchies" can go straight to hell.

    8. Re:Hrm, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...And once again, victims are confused for heroes.

  81. Non-violence is immoral?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    There is absolutely nothing immoral about refusing to resort to violence even under the worst conditions or threat of imminent death of oneself or even a loved one.

    We need more people like that in this world. I am proud of having served six months in jail for totally refusing to serve in the military (meaning also the unarmed service option).

  82. Interesting list, but... by sheldon · · Score: 2

    I'm shocked that I don't see Ellen Feiss or Natalie Portman on the list.

  83. And what about Tim Berners-Lee? by Redshift · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why focus on Linus in this story? Tim Berners-Lee is deservedly in the same list. If Linus is a Saint, Tim must be the Pope.

    1. Re:And what about Tim Berners-Lee? by Chalupa · · Score: 1

      With all due respect to the "name" players that are involved with the internet today, didn't the internet pretty much invent itself on its own, and all of us kind of watched it take place? I remember playing with something that seemed like the internet as far back as 1985. How do you slow down the Borg? Give them an AOL disc. How do STOP the Borg? Give them a copy of Windows XP upgrade. Chalupa

  84. wrong story by clarkie.mg · · Score: 2

    I think you have posted your comment in the wrong story. The one about micro$oft buying macromedia is here

    Oh wait ...

    --
    Men are born ignorant, not stupid; they are made stupid by education. Bertrand Russel
  85. Re:BILL FRIST POST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If that makes you feel better about being a Republican, whatever. It is false though. Are all the non-white democrats also racist? Why do you suppose there are so many more non-white democrats than republicans?

  86. Funny jibber-jabber all over that site! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the fuck is that mixed-up jumble of letters on that web site? Ah cain't make out heads nor tails out o' that furren jibber-jabber!

    Learn to speak English, you dumb-fuck Dutch! Sheesh, put down the hash pipe long enough to do something RIGHT for a change! Besides being the world's leading producer of child pornography, that is!

    1. Re:Funny jibber-jabber all over that site! by Teun · · Score: 2
      Yeah, but that's because them kids only understand this jibber-jabber and got no way to go on these wooden shoes. Besides they're all stoned by the time they're three.

      At least they know the difference between Good and W.Bush..

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  87. Gosh, you're right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What can I have been thinking all these years? It's so simple! Thanks, Space Ghost!

    1. Re:Gosh, you're right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually there are so few colored republicans because the democrats give out more handouts.

      The republicans actually expect you to earn what you get...

      Whining about how great-great-great-grandma was a slave (they never mention how she was already a slave in africa before her chieftan sold her to the whites) won't get you a box of government cheese and a rent voucher from the republicans they actually want you to get off your dead ass and do something productive.

    2. Re:Gosh, you're right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      riiiggght. Like the way dubya earned his position. Had nothing to do with his daddy, had it?

    3. Re:Gosh, you're right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you trying to say colored folk ain't good daddies?

      Because i agree with that. They knock up a ho at 16 and then go to jail for 5 years for robbing a 7-11 then they spend the rest of their lives doing manual labor in between thievery sprees and never help the child.

    4. Re:Gosh, you're right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, Dubya earned his position all right. Look up who it was that saved his ass by buying out Arbusto (at more than four times its value) when all their oil wells turned out to be worthless... That's right, it was USAMA BIN LADEN'S daddy - old friend of Bush senior. Bush Jr. had to give sloppy blow jobs to all the top brass of BCCCI, which is why he hates Arabs so much - they pulled his hair when they came!

      It's true, you know. And that's not even mentioning the way he earned his wings in the Texas Air Guard... his asshole is still sore!

  88. Haha by Geekwad · · Score: 1

    Anyone else notice how much Linus looks like Bill Gates in that picture?

    --

    - http://pakman.sytes.net/
  89. Re:Visual Studio .NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Several people in class commented that our project was the best, so I have to say that you're full of shit, and it's pathetic that you feel the need to trumpet your second-rate project here on slashdot, where you think nobody else from class will be able to call your bluff. Your project sucked. Deal with it. VB kicked your ass.

  90. Did anyone else think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else think from the title that they were talking about Linus from Snoopy? You know with the Charlie Brown Christmas special lately and all...maybe I've just had 1 too many Christmas specials =P But both Linus's are pretty cool =D

  91. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  92. Linus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who's that?

  93. It's time to... by little1973 · · Score: 1

    ...rename my charachter in Morrowind.

    Name: Linus
    Level: Godlike
    Cast: Knight of the Open Source

    --
    Government cannot make man richer, but it can make him poorer. - Ludwig von Mises
  94. Dear God, save us from your followers by Teun · · Score: 2

    Eventhough I still like /.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  95. Linus' Mother is a Saint.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Saint Bernard.

  96. Re:Not so sure he knows what he is talking about.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would definitly say that RMS fits the bill much more than some others.

    Shh. If the vatican reads this, RMS will be removed from their list.

  97. RMS is NOT a hero anymore... by bluephone · · Score: 1

    He's a great founder, but like all founders, he is an idealist, and an un-bending one. He has helped start a great movement, but by his stubborn refusal to acknowledge that the world will never completely move to totally Free software, and refusal to acknowledge that Open source Software in general is at least a great compromise for now, holds back the movement to a degree. The FSF seems to recognize this, as they're moving away from using him as the sole point man for speaking engagements. RMS is a good man, but he needs to recognize his time is passing, and step aside, to let a new era of leadership push on.

    --
    jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
    1. Re:RMS is NOT a hero anymore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RMS is a good man, but he needs to recognize his time is passing, and step aside, to let a new era of leadership push on.

      Time for RMS the White instead of RMS the Grey?

  98. Re:Visual Studio .NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut up, Cartman.

  99. Re:Non-violence is immoral?!?! QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is absolutely nothing immoral about refusing to resort to violence even under the worst conditions or threat of imminent death of oneself or even a loved one.

    Yes, absolutely non-violence is immoral. It is immoral to cowardly refuse to defend yourself and your love ones and allowing others to die protecting you. Now, it's one thing if you are unable to defend yourself/loved ones, or even unneeded to defend yourself/loved ones but unwillingness is absolutely contemptibly immoral.

    I am proud of having served six months in jail for totally refusing to serve in the military (meaning also the unarmed service option).

    And do you spit on the graves of those who died protecting your freedom on veteran's day as well? Even if you don't literally spit, you mentally spit on them with your "pride".

    Hopefully, you have at least renounced your citizenship of whatever country you live in so as not to take advantage of the freedom that "violence" has won for you. If not, then you are a bald-faced hypocrite.

  100. Re:Visual Studio .NET by ebbomega · · Score: 2

    Heh.

    That's funny.

    Someone pretending to be someone in my class.

    Hee hee...

    So, what course was it and who was the prof? Heck, what school do I go to?

    --
    Karma: Non-Heinous
  101. Linking to sites in Dutch by m.e.l.l.e.n.t.i.n.e · · Score: 1

    If google doesn't speak dutch, neither do I. Someone please tell me in English what it said. ;-)

    --

    Producer: NEXT!!
    Ralph Wiggum: Chicken necks
  102. RMS by Tonetheman · · Score: 1

    Sorry but RMS is not even in the same league. He complains and whines and ruins any credit he deserves.

    RMS has done a lot do not get me wrong, emacs rules. And he has contributed many things to open source. However he has a socialist vision of programming and wants programmers to beg for a living. IMHO he is no saint. He is a poster child for open source that I do not want on my poster.

  103. Re:Non-violence is immoral?!?! QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It is immoral to cowardly refuse to defend yourself and your love ones and allowing others to die protecting you.

    I will not hurt another human being even if it means my own demise and I do not expect anyone else to protect me either.

    Just as you are willing to fight killing other people and possibly dying yourself, I am willing to die not fighting and possibly witnessing the death of my loved ones as a result of my convictions. Yet, the end result is exactly the same: a lot of people will die. And why? Because someone fired the first shot. I refuse to categorize my loved ones any more worthy of life than the enemies you would be killing.

    And do you spit on the graves of those who died protecting your freedom on veteran's day as well?

    And how much would that hard-won freedom be worth of if even after or because of their sacrifice I wouldn't be FREE to choose between killing and refusing to kill?

    This is something you militants never seem to understand. I am not condemning or passing judgement over those who take up to the arms. I respect your choice. However, if you go to the fight you should know that if you really are fighting for freedom it by definition must also mean the freedom of choosing not to fight.

  104. Re:Visual Studio .NET by The+Bungi · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    I'm sorry moron, but you're confusing quality of development tools with the viability of a language (or the lack thereof).

    So, you were feeding the trolls, and you managed to reply with the worst possible non-sequitur I've seen in a while here in Slashdot, and that's saying a lot.

    And, BTW, regardless of your smartass rationalizations, Microsoft development tools are absolutely second to none. Writing C in vi or emacs is very nice and gives you that coveted CLI geek aura, but it does squat for your productivity.

    Hope this helps, and have yourself a very merry christmas!

  105. interesting choices.. by miltimj · · Score: 1

    Interesting choices..

    Steve Jobs
    Opray Winfrey
    Tiger Woods
    Bruce Springsteen
    John Steinbeck
    Sting
    Tina Turner
    Steven Spielberg
    Pele
    Robert Redford
    Van Morrison
    Michael Jordan
    Two of the Beatles (George and Paul)

    ...Oh, and I like the "official pic" of Albert Einstein...

    --
    "Truth is not decided by majority vote" consensus gentium -- Norman Geisler
  106. Good choice! by rlowe69 · · Score: 2

    Go Linus! I always knew he rocked, that's why I named my cockatiel after him! I also named my fish after Alan Cox ...

    Good thing it wasn't the other way around. Even though naming your cockatiel after Alan has a certain aliteratory appeal, you don't want to be chasing after him when he runs away in the neighborhood yelling "Here, cox! Get over here, cox!! Com'ere boy!! That's a good cox!".

    --
    ----- rL
  107. preach it brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only site I let Flash through on would be Laila Ali's site and as for the rest... fuck 'em. Flash is for homosexuals and others who like gay site design. I FUCKING HATE the losers who do entire sites in that garbage.

  108. Re:RMS - sticks to his convictions...how about you by Sh0t · · Score: 1

    Tons of people who develop open source software or who make linux distrobutions do plenty of consulting work and have "clients" as you speak. Not to mention what better portfolio to have than to be able to point to a widely used, under scrutiny, open source (They can SEE the quality of your code) and have it be accepted by the geek masses? Not much really.

  109. hahahaha by geek · · Score: 2

    Ok first Roarke invented a new product (this is fiction you do realize?) marketed it and out did his competitors on fair market terms. How in the sam hell do you derive RMS from this? RMS didn't invent anything, he copied very old ideas from AT&T and made some slight improvements on them. The community took it from there. Perhaps you should actually read Atlas Shrugged before spouting off at the mouth as if you understood it. Oh and Roarke was never labeled crazy, he was labeled evil for not giving everything to charity. RMS is the OPPOSITE of Roarke you moron.

    Stallman hasn't contributed anything nearly as great as you seem to think. RMS isn't the entire FSF movement, there are MILLIONS more people contributing a great deal EVERYDAY. You Stallman worshipers really astound me with your ignorance and blind devotion to a man who has proved time and time again to be nothing more than a school yard bully to other developers. The only other FSF figure head even remotely as looney as RMS is Theo from OpenBSD.

    History wont even blink at RMS, nor Linus. This is just software, not some great political movement like you seem to think. 10 years from now OS's as we know them wont even be a blip on the radar screen.

    What free software do I use? What the hell does that matter? Is this the part where I'm supposed to whip out my dick and measure it along side yours to see who's the bigger man?

    1. Re:hahahaha by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 2

      RMS invented GPL and the FSF, and the "community" to which you refer followed naturally. Not to knock the work of all those contributors, but the framework matters.

      This is just software, not some great political movement like you seem to think."

      Yeah , and "When a pickpocket meets a saint, all he sees are his pockets."

  110. Re:RMS - sticks to his convictions...how about you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My clients get the source code and the license allows them do whatever they want with it except to redistribute it without my permission.

  111. oh excuse me by geek · · Score: 2

    I meant The Fountainhead not Atlas Shrugged.

  112. Slackware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  113. RMS didn't get an award? Good. by Barto · · Score: 1

    Linus is interested in what can be practically applied to benifit users (Linux), not some utopian philosophy.

    I don't think a planet can exist where everyone does something "for the common good". I agree with some of RMS's stance (copyright should not apply to individuals, it is oppressive which goes against the intent of capitalism). But much of it is shockingly utopian.

    Barto

  114. A zombie!!! A zombie!!! by NineNine · · Score: 3, Funny

    Did anybody else notice that one of their "heroes" is a ZOMBIE!!!?? It looks like one of the zombies from the "Living Dead" series. I expect him to say "Braaaaiiiinnnns" (in Dutch, of course).

  115. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  116. if I had to rely on Apple... by sirshannon · · Score: 1

    I would still not be able to buy a computer. So I would never have bought one and started programming and gotten a great job and made a lot of money and had a company car and gotten laid off and lost the car and been out of work for the last 11 months and 2 days.

    maybe I'm on Apple's side here after all. Down with MS!

  117. Saint Linus!?!?!? Blasphemy!!! by Dolemite_the_Wiz · · Score: 2, Funny

    There is only one Saint Linus and he was created by Charles Schultz.

    Thou shalt not have other Saint Linus before the one true Saint Linus.

    --
    Save the World! Use a Quote!
  118. Depends On Where You`re Coming From ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    A lot of U.S. posters seem to be upset that they don`t recognise all the names on the list - well I`m sure other countries find U.S. news items rather insular as well. Just depends where you`re coming from.

  119. anyone.... by mjp9055 · · Score: 1

    anyone find it weird that tina turner is on that page?

  120. Re:RMS - sticks to his convictions.. QWZX by www.whitehouse.org · · Score: 1
    Hmm, well, I can't view the site since I don't run flash or read Dutch for that matter.

    It's tough to be critical of Mother Theresa, but Gandhi is overrated.

    ...

    Gandhi got lucky, because he was battling the british empire that had a basic morality. Gandhi's philosophy itself, however, was fundamentally immoral.


    I agree to some extent with your view on Gandhi. But, do you really know anything about Mother Theresa? Where did all of the money (hundreds of millions of dollars) that was donated to her Order go? It certainly didn't go toward improving the conditions of the dying people that flocked to her "clinics." They lived and died in horrid, squalid conditions. Those who were dying painful deaths were not given any form of pain killers, after all, suffering is good for the soul. All they received was a good "Catholic death," which was the point of her clinics really. They were not there for the ill, just the dying. But did they have to die in pain and misery in squalid conditions?

    While she checked into the best, most expensive hospitals to treat her medical conditions, those who (erroneously) travelled to her clinics in search of medical treatment were ignored or given no advice on where to seek treatment.

    If you want to know more about Mother Theresa than what the media has spoonfed to you, check out
    The Missionary Position: Mother Teresa in Theory and Practice by Christopher Hitchens. Had to look it up, I read it a while ago, good to see it's still in print. Controversial, occassionally over the top, but worth the read.

    --
    Mod me down and I shall become more trollish than you can possibly imagine!
  121. CowboyNeal by ottffssent · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    is *my* hero!

  122. Boo hoo by Stumbles · · Score: 0

    So Taylor dropped drugs. Wheee whoooo. That rates in a listing. Ya that really was a societial earthshaking event.

    What about the countless "lesser" folk (ie, the non-popular) that overcame a drug addition.

    I think the guy that made the list was on drugs.

    --
    My karma is not a Chameleon.
  123. Re:Worst...post...ever....RMS by Stumbles · · Score: 0

    The root-mean-square (RMS) of a variate x, sometimes called the quadratic mean, is the square root of the mean squared value of x: Physical scientists often use the term root-mean-square as a synonym for standard deviation when they refer to the square root of the mean squared deviation of a signal from a given baseline or fit.

    --
    My karma is not a Chameleon.
  124. Re:Visual Studio .NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm afraid I can't do that, Dave.

  125. Re:Non-violence is immoral?!?! QWZX by jnana · · Score: 1
    I will not hurt another human being even if it means my own demise.... I refuse to categorize my loved ones any more worthy of life than the enemies you would be killing.

    I really do admire your sentiment. I used to be a strident pacifist myself, but now I believe that there are cretin out there whose life isn't worth as much as those of decent person who contributes something to the world. I would like to give you a quiz and see how strong your conviction is, and I hope you'll play along.

    Consider the following thought experiment:

    Your wife and newborn baby girl are sleeping calmly in the next room. At the same time, you're hacking away on the computer in the study, when you see on the security cam that somebody is entering your house. You recognize the face immediately, because it's been on the news for days. It is a lunatic who has recently escaped from a maximum security psychiatric ward. You recall that this guy especially likes raping babies, after which he always kills his victims, but he's not averse to raping and killing women or men either. He has a gun. You have a gun. You try to call 911, but it is busy.

    You know that you have to handle this situation yourself, so you surreptitiously come up behind him, telling him that you have a gun and not to move. He calmly tells you that if you leave the house before he turns around, you get to live, and he'll be satisfied with whoever else is in the house; if you stay, you must either shoot him, or he will shoot you.

    When he turns around, he will shoot you, and then he will proceed to brutally rape and kill first your child and then your wife. You know this with certainty. You have 1 second to decide whether to kill him or die yourself, and have your family raped and slaughtered. What do you do?

    There are no other outcomes than the two described. Can you honestly say that you would let your wife and child be raped and murdered, not to mention whoever else the guy will do the same to afterwards???

  126. well, so is pim fortuyn... by DrStrangeLoop · · Score: 1

    ..according to this rather random list.
    for those of you who dont know, he was a rather right-wing populistic politician in the netherlands until his violent death this year.
    since he is credited in the list as "stem van het volk" (i think this means "voice of the people", on the other hand i am german not dutch), and since both ophrah and lady di are also included, i think one should not take this list too seriously.
    and fortuyn is even pictured right besides anne frank! now that is BAD TASTE.

    -strangeloop

    1. Re:well, so is pim fortuyn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and fortuyn is even pictured right besides anne frank! now that is BAD TASTE

      Why, because he was radically pro-israel? And publicly stated islam is retarted?

    2. Re:well, so is pim fortuyn... by DrStrangeLoop · · Score: 1

      matter of fact, yes, i think publicy stating "islam is retarted" is against the values we remember anne frank for. regardless of all pro/antisemitic bullshit.
      dammit, i dont think anne frank got remembered just for being a jew, so who cares what fortuyns position on this braindead subject was.
      all we can learn from this is that today, there are people who think of a major worldwide religion as being retarted [or worse], just like in 1933. fsckin stupid.

      --strangeloop.

  127. GOATSE IS A HE-SHE!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not his ass. The guy is a hermaphrodite, and that is his vagina. If you look very closely at the picture, you can actually see his asshole quite a bit further up. He is a she. See this article for more info.

  128. Of course he wasn't a saint! by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

    "Too bad RMS or Saint Ignuciuis he wasn't chosen, even though he was recommended.""

    Of course he wasn't! He's no lowly saint, he's nothing less than the Second Coming! He'll tell you himself!

    Oh, wait... GNU/Second Coming.

  129. Per-Seat Licensing by sparkz · · Score: 2

    Ah! So that where the phrase "Per-Seat Licensing" comes from :)

    --
    Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
  130. Re:I'd have read it but... QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jackass, what the fuck do you want him to do? move?
    Let's just pack up our shit and move, over our internet connection no less. You are retarded

  131. Re:RMS - sticks to his convictions...how about you by Stumbles · · Score: 0
    Ohhhhh boy....... sign me up for the money cascade software you are so proud of.

    Phhht..... like MS cares about quality. At least in open source when a problem is found they fix it. Unlike your great savior that still hasn't fixed outlook and how long has that been around. "People actually paying to hear RMS talk really reminds me of a cult." LOL, at least open source folks don't go around try to buy/bribe Governments, agencies, etal to use their product.

    --
    My karma is not a Chameleon.
  132. Re:Non-violence is immoral?!?! QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet, the end result is exactly the same: a lot of people will die. And why? Because someone fired the first shot.

    No, the end result is NOT the same. You seem to think that wars and killing are just random events, and have no consequences or reasons. A horrific number of people died in WW/II, yet most people would say those people died for a noble cause -- preservation of the world's freedom. If we hadn't fought, an entire race would be exterminated. If Hitler had conquered the world, it would've taken hundreds of years and who knows how much misery until the world recovered from it.

    And how much would that hard-won freedom be worth of if even after or because of their sacrifice I wouldn't be FREE to choose between killing and refusing to kill?

    That's not the issue -- the issue at hand is morality, and the fact that pacifism is immoral. You and everyone have a responsibility to civilization to stand against aggressors determined to destroy it. Why? Because those that came before you died to give you civizilization, and this freedom to choose pacifism that you hold so dear. By refusing to fight and embrace the responsibility to preserve the freedom of those that come after you, you throw away and render meaningless the sacrifice of past patriots.

    I will say this: There is only one way I recognize a "moral" pacifist, and that is one that refuses to live among civilized society and utilize that benefits of it. Since the freedom and civilization of modern society was won using violence against oppressors, then a moral pacifist must reject it. Otherwise, you are simply a freeloading hypocrite who wants to enjoy the fruits of other's labor, but is unwilling to work or sacrifice himself.

  133. Re:I'd have read it but... QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jackass, what the fuck do you want him to do? move?

    How about stop whining? Not every web site has to be designed for the crappiest ghetto connection. It reminds me of the idiots with 33 Mhz Pentiums who whine that Doom III won't run on their crappy hardware and requires the latest and greatest. Well don't buy the fucking game then and continue to play your crappy blackjack game. But I shouldn't be penalized for having good equipment and a good Internet connection.

  134. Re:Non-violence is immoral?!?! QWZX by Valluvan · · Score: 1

    "..Since the freedom and civilization of modern society was won using violence against oppressors.."
    Can't agree with that. How was India's freedom won ?
    Of course, I know non-violent methods against a totally immoral opponent is very stupid. As ANYTHING in life goes, there various levels and angles to any idea or action. At your position, you make a sensible choice and stick to it. This allows you and your children to enjoy the fruits of your labor and convictions.

    --

    Science as a way of life.
  135. Shouldn't that be... by Joey7F · · Score: 2

    gnu/hero?

    --Joey

  136. Such pictures should not be linked to. by Valar · · Score: 2

    Did we really want to have a picture of Saint Iggy linked to from the front page? I want to burn myself alive now.

  137. Intercedence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, St. Linus we beseech thee. Grant us free software for all us humble servants of the Slashdot. Give us guidance to keep the faith of thy mighty kernel alive. And lead us not into the embrace of the great evil and shield us from its forked and wicked tongue. Keep us safe from the blue screen. Open Source.

  138. Bruce Springsteen by sharph · · Score: 1

    Bruce Springsteen
    Het gevoel van de USA

    Heheh. I can guess what it means. What a description.

  139. Re:I'd have read it but... QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Not at all. But perhaps the lame ass designers should *test* for flash availablility when the client connects, and skip the flash it if it is not there? That "technology" has been around for ages now. Sheer laziness to not implement it, IMHO.

  140. Re:RMS - sticks to his convictions.. QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to know more about Mother Theresa than what the media has spoonfed to you, check out The Missionary Position: Mother Teresa in Theory and Practice [amazon.com] by Christopher Hitchens.

    Interesting link, thanks. I have to admit, that IS a damn good question. Where did all the money go? Why was there so much misery around her?

  141. Re:I'd have read it but... QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, given that 98% of the web has Flash available, I don't think the web designer is all that worried about the other 2%. I mean, what about all the people with version 1.0 browsers that don't support table tags? Am I supposed to test for table availability and make a "green screen" version of my site?

    There comes a point where you just have to say "screw luddites" and just ignore people who refuse to support industry standards. And Flash is an industry standard.

  142. Yee-Hah by jimmyCarter · · Score: 2

    Seriously, who has heard of KRO before? Exactly. I'm putting out a list of the top 300 coolest dudes on earth - make sure you submit it, I'll include Linus.

    --

    -- jimmycarter
  143. Writing a compiler not that hard by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    if writing a compiler is so simple

    Writing a compiler is not actually very difficult. Oh, it's not "hello world", but if you have a basic grounding in assembly and some documentation, it's quite doable for a single person to have a quite usable compiler for a simple language in a month.

    Carnegie Mellon University (as well as many other universities) have a compilers course, in which you write a compiler, so many people actually do so each year.

    Writing a compiler that does really good optimization, on the other hand, is very, very difficult.

    And, last of all, benchmarking and tweaking a compiler is not trivial and takes a *huge* amount of time. If you're compiling for a really simple cacheless architecture, maybe it's a piece of cake, but trying to make a good x86 optimizing compiler (especially one for multiple generations of x86 processors) is a tremendous amount of work.

  144. Re:A zombie!!! A zombie!!! by servies · · Score: 1

    Bloody ignorant idiot... That's Jan Tinbergen, one of the most influential economists of the century...

    grumbl.... bloody ignorant yanks...

  145. Maybe... by ms8423 · · Score: 1

    ...I was starting to lose hope for the generations to come too quickly. And while I disagree with some of the people on there (Marlene Dietrich is, but Corrie ten Boom isn't...), it is a good development to see that people still have heroes.

    --ms

  146. Bah, humbug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I normally keep my mouth shut on issues like this, but this takes the cake. I don't deny Linus' place in history but to consider him more worthy of this type of accolade (which is pure hokum I have to add) than RMS is blinkered. It's really quite simple: before RMS there was no concerted effort to make a free operating system. The work he did to allow us to be in the position we are today, is really quite tremendous. Linus, for all his great work, is small potatoes in comparison.

    It's this kind of nonsense that forces the FSF to request the operating system be called GNU/Linux.

  147. Role Model Maybe by ONOIML8 · · Score: 2

    Linus is a role model, not a hero.

    I seem to remember being instructed as to what a hero is in basic training. But I never understood it, not really.

    Not until I met one. Two holes in his chest and fighting for his own life at that point. But he saved two lives prior. That is a hero.

    A hero is the man who runs into a blazing fire in order to save your sorry ass.

    A hero is the lady who jumps into an ice cold river to save your child.

    A role model is someone who writes a free Unix like kernel and gives it to the world for free.

    I want to be like Linus some day. I hope I never have to be a hero.

    --
    . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
  148. Pro-Israel = Anti-Semitic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those seem like a couple of good reasons.

  149. Congrads for Linus by T.E.D. · · Score: 2

    ...but if it were me, I'd be embarresed to be listed up there with Martin Luther King, Mahatma Gandi, Anne Frank, The New York Firefighters, Steve Biko, Nelson Mandela, Albert Einstein, etc. Father of the Free OS or no, I'd feel unworthy to lick their boots.

    Then again, there's Bono & David Bowie, so perhaps it isn't as bad as all that. :-)

  150. Interesting Dutch perspective by T.E.D. · · Score: 2

    There are a lot of Dutch folk on there I've never heard of. If it were made by Americans, I'm sure there'd be a lot more Americans on it that few outside of this country have heard of. But, given that its a list made by Dutch people, I'm really impressed at the number of Americans on it. Particularly popular culture figures that you'd figure wouldn't translate overseas well, like Michael Jordan and Bill Cosby.

    I think they chose some Americans we wouldn't have chosen. Cosby is one example. He's an OK comedian, and I loved Fat Albert back in the day and all, but still not exactly a heroic figure in my book. More interestingly, they picked FDR and did not mention Churchill. If Americans made the list, I suspect the reverse would have been true. (Even back during WWII, it was remarked that the US and Britan could switch leaders, and both would be happier).

  151. census by martinflack · · Score: 2

    Good, I'll update my religion on the next census from "Jedi" to "Linux". Glad they got that formalized.

  152. What a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linus Torvalds a saint for his work on Linux? If he is a saint then Steve Jobs and Bill Gates are gods. All he did was take the labour of other peoples hard work and call it his own.

    Give me a break...

  153. What about IrfanView by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The creator of IrfanView could have been nominated too. In fact, a kind of "Nobel Prize" for free software could/should be created each year. I would be willing to give my 10$ for that every year, and if millions are ready to do the same, well...

  154. It's not unknown to mix some religions by Felinoid · · Score: 2

    Buddism is occasionally mixed with other religions (as it's more philosophy based than deity based)
    One Christian buddist chirch exsists (so I'm told).
    Also often Wicca mixes with other religions (it's already paganism coctail) A Zen Wicca coven exsisted a few years back.

    All thats needed are to rationally compatable religions.
    In anchent times mixing religions happened a lot. Bast was marryed to just about every god as she got transplanted into diffrent groups.
    This btw is why 'you shall have no gods before me' It's basicly the problem of corupting religions as they murge for political reasons.

    But Linux and Slackware are compatable enough. All hail GNU/Bob the pequin savor. We want open slack.

    On the aside. The chirch of GNU DotCom is corrupted.
    It's the mix of open sorce and capitalism. The all mighty doller and 'free speach' aren't directly compatable.
    The GnuBob as a medium between makes a holy trinity that works.
    All hail GnuBob and his messanger the all mighty doller.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  155. Oh yeag lets not forget debian by Felinoid · · Score: 2

    The chirch of Gnu/StarTrek.
    In that one the all mighty buck is a Farigi and not evil but not to be totally trusted.
    A good buffer.

    GnuCthulu? Umm maybe staying away from ElderGod Linux might be wise.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  156. Re:Non-violence is immoral?!?! QWZX by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

    I don't wanna get into the whole whether pacifism is right or not, but I despise people who design impossible situations. Hypothetical is just a synonym for bullshit in my book. If you can't convince the guy to your viewpoint with out resorting to impossible imaginary scenarios, don't bother trying in the first place.

    --
    Why not fork?
  157. Re:Non-violence is immoral?!?! QWZX by jnana · · Score: 1
    Yes, what a moron Einstein was for contemplating the possible consequences of being able to travel at the speed of light. You are correct. Gedanken experiments, or thought experiments, are pointless exercises in futility. Nothing positive ever comes of them.

    Thanks for your words of wisdom, now crawl back into your hole, troll!

  158. Re:Non-violence is immoral?!?! QWZX by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

    Well, I think you are the troll, but anyway, theres a difference between thought experiements, and hypothetical situations with insanely strict rules to designed to force a person to go against their ideals. Stuff like "If you you could only save one of your children, which one would it be?" Its an impossible question. Or like the grandparent, "If you had almost no choice except NOT to be a pacifist, in this ridiculous contrived situation, because if you stick to your pacifism your entire family will die, or you can pull a trigger and your family is saved." Its a dirty tactic. Anyone can come up with some contrived impossible situation where you can't live by your principles. There is no philosphy that can not fall victim to the over-powering "hypothetical situation". And if you feel the need to use a "hypothetical situation" you aren't arguing your side of the issue very well.

    --
    Why not fork?
  159. Re:RMS - sticks to his convictions.. QWZX by www.whitehouse.org · · Score: 1

    Interesting link, thanks. I have to admit, that IS a damn good question. Where did all the money go? Why was there so much misery around her?

    There's no accounting where the money went. Undoubtedly, some of it went to build clinics in other locations and to pay for her medical bills. As for the misery, well, she set up shop for the dying poor in third world countries. The vast majority of them were terminally ill and would have died in misery even if they stayed home. With all that money, surely she could have eased their suffering a bit?

    --
    Mod me down and I shall become more trollish than you can possibly imagine!
  160. Re:Non-violence is immoral?!?! QWZX by lvdrproject · · Score: 2
    Pacifism is an extremely broad notion. You can't just say all pacifism (except for the one-that-refuses-to-live-among-society one) is immoral. Maybe if, like you said, some situation arose that was impossible to overcome without violence, like Hitler's attempts at genocide/domination/what-have-you, you could then say that being pacifist in that situation was immoral. But there's nothing to say that that Hitler couldn't have been overcome without violence. We don't know that. Most likely not, but had just a few things happened differently, perhaps Hitler could've been stopped in a different way. A non-violent guard/military/police revolt, a citizen revolt, an outside tactic; something could conceivably stopped Hitler in a non-violent way. The odds are extremely slim, of course, but there's enough of a chance there that doesn't permit an absolute "pacifism is immoral" standpoint.

    What about more trivial cases? What if, for example, when you were children, your brother took away a toy of yours, or something of that nature? You're presented with two options: beat his ass and get it back, or solve it in a non-violent way. I don't see how anyone could possibly say that someone doing the latter is "immoral". That's ridiculous. You're basing an entire philosophy on a very small per-centage of possible occurances. Maybe World War I and II were justified somewhat, but there are other wars that have happened with somewhat questionable motives. Again, i don't see how not participating in something like that could be considered immoral, if your opinion is that the war itself is immoral.

    Defending one's country represents a VERY small piece of the possible-violent-conflicts pie. Most likely 90% of all would-be violent conflicts in one's life would be trivial, stupid things, like the example i mentioned above. And pacifism does NOT mean inactivity, as your posts seem to suggest. Pacifism simply means non-violence. A peace accord, a compromise, a petition, a refusal to obey orders; these are non-violent ways to end conflicts. Pacifism does not mean simply sitting on your ass and watching the world go by because you're a coward. Pacifism means you strive to solve conflicts without violence.

    You obviously either don't know what pacifism means, or you're choosing to ignore the broader scope of it.

  161. Re:Non-violence is immoral?!?! QWZX by jnana · · Score: 2
    theres a difference between thought experiements, and hypothetical situations with insanely strict rules to designed to force a person to go against their ideals.

    My thought experiment was designed to test the conviction of the belief -- that is, are there limits, and if so, what are they? If you were a pacifist and you would not stick by your pacifism in the hypothetical situation, then we would have established that there is a limit to your pacifism (it isn't absolute). Perhaps there are other limits. The reason this came up in the first place is that the original poster implied that there were no limits at all to his pacifism. If that were really so, he would have to say, "I would die and let them die in that situation." Whether it's likely to occur or not is irrelevant. It is totally legitimate, even standard practice -- e.g., in thought experiments -- to come up with unusual, extremely unlikely scenarios, often for pedagogical purposes, but for other reasons too. They often illustrate a point much better than a more mundane scenario -- as in this case.

    I'm sorry you have such an aversion to hypothetical situations. Whole worlds of thought are thus completely off-limits for you. I for one, though, am glad that writers, scientists, musicians, artists, and intellectuals of every kind don't share your distaste for the hypothetical.

  162. Re:Non-violence is immoral?!?! QWZX by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

    Ok, let me challenge you with this: Create an argument that challenges the absolutism of the poster's pacifism without using a hypothetical situation. Show me with pure logic why you are right. if you can't, you don't really have a strong argument and your situation is just as invalid as a straw man attack, or an ad hominem attack.

    --
    Why not fork?
  163. Re:Non-violence is immoral?!?! QWZX by jnana · · Score: 2
    Such an argument would be a sufficient but not necessary condition. Look it up if you don't know what I'm talking about. What I've shown already is also sufficient, assuming that the original poster would answer my hypothetical in the way that you have.

    I am tired of responding to you, since you don't ever directly address what I have said, but just insist on the same 6-year old standard of proof every time. Perhaps one day you'll go to college and take a critical thinking class, and then I'll happily continue the discussion.

  164. Re:Non-violence is immoral?!?! QWZX by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

    Ok, obviously I haven't taken a critical thinking course in college (yet anyway) and I will admit I don't know what "sufficient but not necessary condition" means (but I plan to look it up).

    My problem is that the argument rubs me the wrong way. It feels like the mental equivalent (although more subtle) of aiming a gun at a guys head and saying "say I'm great, or I'll blow your brains out". Now, its entirely possible that I am wrong, and frankly I didn't get into this because of the pacifist/non-pacifist issues. I just really don't like an argument that seems (to me) to have artificial limits on its response.

    Now I hope I've proven to you that I can be reasonable. Obviously this dicussion isn't going anywhere and I think we should agree to disagree. Either that or argree to disagree and secretly think the other is a jerk ;)

    --
    Why not fork?
  165. Re:Non-violence is immoral?!?! QWZX by jnana · · Score: 2
    Okay, one last response, since you are being reasonable now. Necessary and sufficient conditions are types of conditions for the existence of something, or the truth of something. Let us consider human beings for a moment. Having a y chromosome is a necessary condition for being a man, since there is no man that lacks a y chromosome. Having a y chromosome is also a sufficient condition in this case, because if foo is a human, and foo has a y chromosome, then it follows that foo is definitely a man (I'm ignoring the xyy people for the sake of clarity). Having an x chromosome, however, is a necessary but not sufficient condition. If foo is a man, then foo definitely has an x chromosome, but if you all you know is that foo has an x chromosome, then you don't know enough to determine that foo is a man (could be a woman with xx), therefore, it is not a sufficient condition. Having both an x and a y chromosome is also a necessary and a sufficient condition. A sufficient condition for being a woman is that foo does not have any y chromosomes. A necessary and sufficient condition is that foo has at least two x chromosomes. I hope this makes clear what I mean by necessary and sufficient.

    To relate this back to my original remark, having a clear (correct) explanation that doesn't rely on hypotheticals is a sufficient condition for establishing the truth of the claim, but it is not necessary. To say that it isn't necessary is to say that there are other forms of justification that are also sufficient. I am making the claim that one of these alternate means of justification is a hypothetical that brings the issue at hand clearly into focus. You disagree, and are arguing that unless there is a plain explanation without hypotheticals, then the claim is false. The claim we are considering here is whether the guy's pacifist views are absolute (i.e., no exceptions whatsoever) or not.

    My problem is that the argument rubs me the wrong way. It feels like the mental equivalent (although more subtle) of aiming a gun at a guys head and saying "say I'm great, or I'll blow your brains out". Now, its entirely possible that I am wrong, and frankly I didn't get into this because of the pacifist/non-pacifist issues. I just really don't like an argument that seems (to me) to have artificial limits on its response.

    But there are natural limits on possible responses, and this is what my hypothetical illustrates. Either the guy's pacifism is absolute, as he implies, or it is not. If it is absolute, then it would not be possible for me to come up with a scenario that would cause him to go against his beliefs. Conversely, if it is possible for me to come up with a scenario (any scenario at all, however unlikely, however contrived) that causes him to go against his beliefs, then his beliefs are not absolute. This follows necessarily from simple rules of logic and the definition of absolute pacifism (or the gloss that I gave it as 'without exception'). Anyway, perhaps you still disagree, and we can agree to disagree.

  166. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    Fellow programmer, greetings! You are reading a letter which will bring
    you luck and good fortune. Just mail (or UUCP) ten copies of this letter
    to ten of your friends. Before you make the copies, send a chip or
    other bit of hardware, and 100 lines of 'C' code to the first person on the
    list given at the bottom of this letter. Then delete their name and add
    yours to the bottom of the list.

    Don't break the chain! Make the copy within 48 hours. Gerald R. of San
    Diego failed to send out his ten copies and woke the next morning to find
    his job description changed to "COBOL programmer." Fred A. of New York sent
    out his ten copies and within a month had enough hardware and software to
    build a Cray dedicated to playing Zork. Martha H. of Chicago laughed at
    this letter and broke the chain. Shortly thereafter, a fire broke out in
    her terminal and she now spends her days writing documentation for IBM PC's.

    Don't break the chain! Send out your ten copies today!
    For example, if \thinmskip = 3mu, this makes \thickmskip = 6mu. But if
    you also want to use \skip12 for horizontal glue, whether in math mode or
    not, the amount of skipping will be in points (e.g., 6pt). The rule is
    that glue in math mode varies with the size only when it is an \mskip;
    when moving between an mskip and ordinary skip, the conversion factor
    1mu=1pt is always used. The meaning of '\mskip\skip12' and
    '\baselineskip=\the\thickmskip' should be clear.
    -- Donald Knuth, TeX 82 -- Comparison with TeX80

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...