Slashdot Mirror


Requiem for the Disappearing Pay Phone

StarEmperor writes "This Washington Post article describes the steady disappearance of pay phones as cell phones become more commonplace. Many pay phones, which used to generate hundreds of dollars per month in revenue, are now used so infrequently that they cost money to operate. I wonder what kind of environmental hazard is posed by junking thousands of pay phones?"

504 comments

  1. where can I get one? by dknight · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What if I, say, want to buy these payphones they're throwing out? I'd love to have an ACTUAL payphone in my house or something.

    1. Re:where can I get one? by vasqzr · · Score: 3, Funny


      You've never seen those start-your-own-business things with payphones?

      Put them anywhere! tons of revenue!

      Check it out!

    2. Re:where can I get one? by TalonKarrde989 · · Score: 1

      Interesting idea. I guess you could just drive to the junk yard or talk to one of the people selling them.

    3. Re:where can I get one? by rickthewizkid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They are available online, ebay, etc. The only trouble is, they have been "adjusted" to not require coins. If you were to want to make it a real pay phone, you would need the totalizer circuitry (not something the phone cos want to have in the wild ... look up the term "red box") and a ACTS phone line - convincing the telco to do that for you would be difficult....

      Just my 90-cents-for-the-first-three-minutes-worth...
      Ric kTheWizKid

    4. Re:where can I get one? by FyRE666 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm not sure where you are geographically, but over here in the UK the old red phoneboxes would be far too heavy to install in a house without major reinforcement for the floor. I'm guessing they were solid steel/iron, with about a million coats of paint each over the graphitti/urine ;-)

    5. Re:where can I get one? by DeadSea · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Indeed, if you search, there are quite a few pay phones on ebay. Pretty impressive.

    6. Re:where can I get one? by npietraniec · · Score: 2

      You evidently didn't read the part about people urinating on them.

    7. Re:where can I get one? by sven_kirk · · Score: 1

      Why in the heck would you want one? I know it would be neat, but jeez. I almost had to use one last week, but didn't because I was afraid I'd catch something from it. I'd rather eat from the floor in a port-o-potty, than use one. Not to mention that they now charge a minimum 50 cents.

    8. Re:where can I get one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be cool, I'd put it next to the functioning parking meter I 'found' one day! I'd get the change out of the parking meter to make phone calls.

    9. Re:where can I get one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do red boxes still work at payphones? I still have a Radio Shack dialer and some crystals lying around. I was going to put it together years ago but my soldering skills aren't too good.

    10. Re:where can I get one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modern payphones dont handle the coin requirement - the phone network does. This is why you can make operator, toll-free, etc type calls from a payphone without coins. All the phone does is send special tone signals to inform the switch of particular sizes of coins being inserted.

    11. Re:where can I get one? by benna · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      did you just say "neat"?

      --
      "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
    12. Re:where can I get one? by An+Ominous+Cow+Erred · · Score: 2

      The phone company will never ever give you an ACTS line. It's not something they give out. No end-user customer "owns" a ACTS-type phone.

      All customer owned payphones (COCOTs) use regular phone lines and do all their billing internally. A COCOT is relatively easy to obtain -- anyone can buy one, and it will happily ask for your quarters. :-)

    13. Re:where can I get one? by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 2

      They can if properly designed. Ma Bell spent millions on hardware and software at the Central Offices for fraud protection. They measure the exact frequency and duration of coin tone blasts, and it's pretty hard to fake it by hand. A microprocessor circuit to meter the tones precisely might do the trick...

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    14. Re:where can I get one? by sstarterr · · Score: 1

      wonder if these sales are tied to actual telco's or particulars that decided to "relocate them' for their best interest... whoah... there's an idea!!

    15. Re:where can I get one? by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 2

      They also have a gadget inside called an "escrow hopper" which holds the coins until the end of the call, when a positive or negative 100 volt pulse is sent to trip the escrow hopper one way or the other - this tells the fone to either barf back or swallow the money.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    16. Re:where can I get one? by dJCL · · Score: 1

      Problem is that they are all $100 refurbs. I want one out of the guys basement so that I can mess with it(mount it on the door of my apartment or something stupid). Imagine the fun of installing pay phones all over the place that are just out of reach? Or having the handset glued to the box. Or the wire's intentionally cut. Even setup some that are the grimiest things you can create and encourage them to get worse - but make sure it works and see how many come and use it... These would be just so much fun!

      --
      On Arrakis: early worm gets the bird. Magister mundi sum!
    17. Re:where can I get one? by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've also heard these days that the phones turn off the handset microphone until you've paid up, so you need to do some funky tricks to get your signal in.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    18. Re:where can I get one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he did.
      But I think they're downright nifty.

    19. Re:where can I get one? by burns210 · · Score: 1

      Didn't the Brady Bunch have a payphone in their house?

    20. Re:where can I get one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not exactly...you can clearly see that they are not using a payphone in episode #16, #24, and #67.

    21. Re:where can I get one? by F452 · · Score: 1

      Yeah! I seem to remember in one episode they were having all kinds of fights over the phone so they installed a pay phone.

      Didn't Mr. Brady have some kind of business call where he kept running out of money? And he was horribly embarrassed and mad maybe, but when he explained it the business partner understood and everything was happy? (Good thing the phone didn't queer the deal :-)

    22. Re:where can I get one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember this folks: eyeball cancers and bone cancers.

      Cellular telephones are microwave broadcasters for Chrissakes.

      No, I don't use cell phones and don't even stand next to idiots dumb enough to use them.

      See you in ten years.

  2. What will happen to 2600 mag? by Lieutenant_Dan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Without pay phones pictures the back cover of 2600 will seem sooooo boring.

    --
    Wearing pants should always be optional.
    1. Re:What will happen to 2600 mag? by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nothing will happen to it since almost all the pics are payphones from other countries.

    2. Re:What will happen to 2600 mag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe it will happen quicker as cell phone use is growing at a faster rate in countries such as China, Nigeria, and Brazil where the cost of land lines is deemed too expensive or current lines cannot accomodate the growth.

    3. Re:What will happen to 2600 mag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      [tangent] When I was stationed in Germany, the UK 5p was about the same size as the one Mark piece. You could use the 5p coin in the German phone booths.

      When I was in the airport in London, I asked this cashier for a Pound worth of 5p's and the guy says, "Your aren't planning on using these on the phones in Germany are you?"

      "Uh, no."

    4. Re:What will happen to 2600 mag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      your story would be much more believable if you asked for more than 20 coins. if you asked for, say, 100 pounds of 5 pence pieces, then the reaction would seem honest.

      nice try, you'll do better next time.

    5. Re:What will happen to 2600 mag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be English. You're arrogant AND dense.

      If it was a lie, it would have been 200 5p coins, but since it isn't a lie it is 20.

    6. Re:What will happen to 2600 mag? by dissonant7 · · Score: 1

      Maybe they'll switch to pictures of public or pay access 802.11 APs (preferably with their GPS location and maybe ssid)?

    7. Re:What will happen to 2600 mag? by denisdekat · · Score: 1
      What will happen to the pranks children played with public telephones? Like calling it as you see a random stranger/victim walking by it from your upstairs window, and playing with it phone switch thing in such a way that that when you hung up, the phone would ring endlessly and only stop when someone lifted it.

      I guess there will be new wireless pranks for the next generation. I wonder what those punks will do ...

  3. Interesting by TalonKarrde989 · · Score: 1

    That's interesting. I myself haven't used a pay phone in....wel...I can't remember the last time

    1. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You yourself and I myself should use a pay phone itself.

    2. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a really, really important use for payphones, and contrary to popular belief it's not for emergency calls (those are covered for free by your cell-phone company).

      It's LONG-DISTANCE CALLS!!! If you don't have long-distance at home, or in fact don't have a land-line at all (like me), you don't want to use up your cell-phone minutes making doubly expensive calls. The cheap way is to pick up a long distance or international calling card from 7/11 and go to a pay-phone - et voila: 50c + $10 for the card and you're talking to England for 3 hours. This is so, so, so important.

      More and more people might have cell-phones, but at the same time i have no doubt that less and less people have land-lines as a result of that. Unless cell companies implement some kind of cheap rate for calling long distance or overseas, payphones are SO needed.

    3. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I last used one when I locked myself out of my house. My keys were inside. Luckily there still was a payphone around the corner at that time.

      Am I strange if I do not have a mobile phone? I hate carrying the damn things around, and I do not find it 'convenient' when people (especially customers) can reach me all the time. If I am out of the office I am *not available*.

    4. Re:Interesting by b96miata · · Score: 1

      I don't know about overseas, but my current cell phone provider has, and has for the 3 years I've been on them, had any and all U.S. long distance included in all their plans. I'm not gonna go so far as to get specific but maybe people should shop around instead of going for the first company that wings some cheap nokia at them as they walk by on the street.

  4. pay phones might get more use if by benfoldsfan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    they cost less. $.50 cents for one phone call is ridiculous

    1. Re:pay phones might get more use if by Bobartig · · Score: 2

      Amen to that. I recall in korea that the pay phone calls were 10W (I think 1100W=$1, so its like pennies per call), and the phones would "save up" the credit from one person to the next. I don't know if they were subsidized, or even if they're still there (haven't been in 10 years, and EVERYONE carries a cell phone now). But if payphones were like $0.10 for local, and $0.05/min long distance, they might actually get used

      --
      This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
    2. Re:pay phones might get more use if by neema · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This should be modded up.

      That was such a stupid step to take, unless they were looking for everyone to add just one more thing to the list of the benefits of having a cell phone. Payphones always have had two advantages in my mind:

      1: They are wired, hence, no fuzz.
      2: Just one shiny thing and you could get a call through.

      Now that it's 50 cents, I find myself approaching a payphone and finding that I don't have the right amount of change on me. Who cares that it's unlimited? The three minute limit was just fine by me. I'm not exactly making leisure calls at a pay phone. The trade off is ridiculous and is bound to doom the payphones.

    3. Re:pay phones might get more use if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This should be modded up" refers to the parent comment. Not the reply. By the way.

    4. Re:pay phones might get more use if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they could connect to the internet, be a camera, play the latest nokia doom port and be hacked to run linux I would use a payphone then.

    5. Re:pay phones might get more use if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the main reason I bought a Cell phone. The other is I didn't like having to touch the filthy and disease coated payphones found most places.

      In Canada, pay phone calls are still 25 cents Canadian (about $0.15)

    6. Re:pay phones might get more use if by chimpo13 · · Score: 1


      There's so many people complaining that a phone call is 50 cents.

      The businesses that operate payphones are going out of business. So, the call is 50 cents trying to keep the place from going under. It's not going to work, because too many people say "50 cents? Screw that". I know I did, but at least now I understand why it's 50 cents, so next time I use a payphone, I'll understand.

      It's a double edged sword (kinda like /. hates micro$oft but loves the xbox).

    7. Re:pay phones might get more use if by hitzroth · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Quote: the last two paragraphs of the article:


      For some, the pay phone has become untouchably déclassé.

      A woman at the Old Ebbitt Grill was asking strangers if she could borrow their cell phones one recent evening. She systematically worked her way through half the people seated at the bar, none of whom had cell phones to lend. Finally, she reached Hayden, who was sipping a beer. He suggested she use the pay phone he maintained in the restaurant. She haughtily replied: "I wouldn't be caught dead using a pay phone."


      Somehow, I don't see the cost as being the primary issue. If you need to make a call, $0.50 isn't that big of a deal. Hell, it's about half a candy-bar around here.

      It sounds like it's becoming a social stigmata to use the urine soaked payphones. As in: "I don't want to look like I'm not good enough/rich enough to have a cell phone."
      --
      In mathematics, one does not understand things, one merely gets used to them.
      --VonNeumann
    8. Re:pay phones might get more use if by phalse+phace · · Score: 1
      Who cares that it's unlimited?

      Unlimited? Geez, no wonder they're losing money. The first mistake was raising the price. The second was making the talk time unlimited. I haven't used a payphone since it cost $0.25 a call.

    9. Re:pay phones might get more use if by fermion · · Score: 1, Insightful
      To me, the decline of the public phone is not that they cost too much, or were inconvenient or dirty, but that the business plan disrespected the customers. There is now enough competition that the telephone companies cannot maintain that disrespect.

      There was a time when not just anyone could get a telephone. The bell monopolies would often charge very large deposits which were beyond the reach of lower income people. The phone company created a class of people who had to use pay phones. They used this captive audience to keep profits up. First, they set up the phones so they would not accept incoming calls. Then they the set the phone up so it was no longer a flat quarter, but was a quarter for a few minutes. It now cost a few dollars an hour to talk on a pay phone.

      When the telephone monopoly faltered, so did the pay phone. Not only were people able to buy cell phones that were now competitive with pay phones, but lower income people only had come up with around $50 or so to get a phone. No longer did you need to give your life saving to get a land line. No longer did you have to pay a days salary to get the phone turned back on. There are now phone companies that will give you land line services when you can pay, with no penalties if you can't. Most cell phone companies will sell phone service by the minute at competitive rates, with extremely cheap starter phones. And since pay phones now charge about a dollar fee if you use a calling card, an immigrant might justify a land line solely on one call home a day.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    10. Re:pay phones might get more use if by Golias · · Score: 1
      That was an interesting take on it... but not entirely historically accurate.

      When the bad old days of the Ma Bell monopoly ended, Bell Telephone pay-phone calls were still a dime, and nearly every home in America had a phone, including poor families.

      They did not go up to a quarter until long after the break-up.

      Also, cellular phones continued to cost far more than a land-line, both in terms of immediate cost and in terms of ongoin rates. The mobile phone did not become the cheaper alternative until digital phone networks arrived, by which time the Baby Bells had long since lost their hold on the market. Here in Minnesota, our Baby Bell, like many others, was bought out by Qwest.

      Digital mobile phones do rock, however. Free long distance, free caller ID, etc. If it were not for "Qworst" providing the leased line for my VISI DSL service, I would have snipped the land line years ago.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    11. Re:pay phones might get more use if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yea, and I would only consider buying a payphone if used standard x86 hardware, was Open Source. And cost less than the Sports Illustrated subscription that got me my "football phone."

      If they did all that, I would buy five of them. Really, honest.

      But we all know they won't because Steve Jobs is an ass. I'm sure that must have something to do with it.

    12. Re:pay phones might get more use if by stickyc · · Score: 4, Informative
      One thing to add - I'm not sure if this still applies (I was told this in the mid 90's), but in California, Pay Phones have 'priority' over other phones in case of emergency. This means that if there's some major catastrophy (IE - earthquake for us CA folk), the phone in your house may not get a connection, but the pay phone usually will.

      This is, of course, dependent on the connection. If you buy one from EBay and stick it in your house, you'll get the same busy signal as the rest of us while the china falls from the cupboards.
      Just something to note when the stuff hits the fan.

    13. Re:pay phones might get more use if by jez9999 · · Score: 2

      How the hell do you people get free long distance on mobile phones? Over here (UK), we have quite a bit of competition in the mobile phone sector (supposedly), yet calls to a land line are significantly expensive (several pence per minute, worse at peak rate). Yet over in America, all long distance calls are free?? Don't your companies have operating costs??

    14. Re:pay phones might get more use if by weave · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Yes, it's true, for the most part. Many plans now charge for "air time" during peak hours (0600-2100 M-F) only, weekends and evenings are unlimited (free). Long distance all around the country is no extra charge so basically on weekends I can make a call to a landline or other cell phone 3,000 miles away and talk for several hours and not be charged a single penny.

      The U.S. mobile market may be chaotic because of all of the different "standards" here (CDMA, TDMA, GSM, iDEN, PCS [aka CDMA-1900]), but the competition for customers is so fierce that the companies are doing this.

      Mind you, the peak minutes are expensive (I get 400 minutes for $40 and extra minutes are 45 cents), and incoming calls are tallied against that as well -- except during off peak time.

    15. Re:pay phones might get more use if by Gekko · · Score: 2

      Well personally I travel alot, make a fair amount of long distance calls, and make most of them at night. With almost unlimited nights and weekends, no roaming, free long distance from anywhere in the us, to anywhere in the US I could not see a reason to not get a cell phone. I could also see no reason to have a home phone anymore.

      I also discovered the added benefit of having a cell phone, telemarketers can not legally call my cell.

      I know a lot of people whom are doing this.

      --
      I mod down any one who says "I'm sure I will get modded down for this"
    16. Re:pay phones might get more use if by Jish · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was in Manhattan on 9/11/2001 and I know that there were lines at the pay phones everywhere. My cell phone and landline were down most of the day, but I assume the people on the pay phone were getting through to their loved ones?

    17. Re:pay phones might get more use if by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      --1: They are wired, hence, no fuzz.--

      You should hear the pay phones in our area. You will get plenty of fuzz.

    18. Re:pay phones might get more use if by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      Keep in mind the companies we're talking about. Pay phone rates aren't the only telephone rates they have monopoly control over.

    19. Re:pay phones might get more use if by raju1kabir · · Score: 2
      The businesses that operate payphones are going out of business. So, the call is 50 cents trying to keep the place from going under. It's not going to work, because too many people say "50 cents? Screw that". I know I did, but at least now I understand why it's 50 cents, so next time I use a payphone, I'll understand.

      I don't. Pricing yourself out of the market is dumb. I used to be a very frequent pay phone user (had a cell, hated it, gave it up). Now that it's 50c, though, I usually don't bother. It's not so much the money as they fact that I don't often have 2 quarters to spare. If the US had near-ubiquitous card pay phones like in the developed world, I'd happily pay the 50 cents.

      I know of some that will accept incoming calls, so if I'm running late to meet someone with caller ID, I can call and hang up and they'll call me back (my friends are used to this). But otherwise I just cadge calls from courtesy phones now. There's added fun in figuring out how to get outside dialtone on a hotel lobby phone.

      The biggest thing we're losing here, by the way, is the ability to make near-anonymous phone calls. There are still plenty of pay phones out of the reach of surveillance cameras, but it won't be that way for long.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    20. Re:pay phones might get more use if by raju1kabir · · Score: 2
      How the hell do you people get free long distance on mobile phones? Over here (UK), we have quite a bit of competition in the mobile phone sector (supposedly), yet calls to a land line are significantly expensive (several pence per minute, worse at peak rate). Yet over in America, all long distance calls are free?? Don't your companies have operating costs??

      This should suggest to you that you're being schnookered by your phone companies about how much it really costs to run a phone company. The infrastructure finance costs can be recovered from the monthly subscription fees and from the limited number of poorly-informed high-usage customers paying overage. Once the infrastructure is in place and sufficiently capacious, there's little marginal cost to the company per minute of use.

      Consider, as well, that immensely profitable US phone companies all manage to offer free local calls to residential landline customers - while BT charges more to call across the street in London during the day than it costs me to call London from 3000 miles away in Washington DC.

      Either they are lying to you or they are grossly inefficient. Either way it's a crime.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    21. Re:pay phones might get more use if by jez9999 · · Score: 2

      I couldn't agree more. Although BT have cleaned up their act (slightly) now and offer the first hour of offpeak UK calls for free, the mobile phone companies show no sign of offering unmetered calls. I'm just complaining :-)

    22. Re:pay phones might get more use if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The other clincher is the demise of the semi-quiet phone booth. I'm tired of standing on a noisy street corner, holding one hand over my left ear, a pencil in my right hand, and the phone jammed on my shoulder. And having to shout so the other party can hear me over the traffic. Those open pay-phone "shells" have made the system worthless in most urban areas and along major highways.

      Not to mention that Clark Kent needs to change his clothes in private...

    23. Re:pay phones might get more use if by geekoid · · Score: 2

      otoh, ig you took 20%of the payphone on an area off the hook, the whole phone system shuts down. Thtas is why they lose phone service during an earthquake That and broken cables.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    24. Re:pay phones might get more use if by Cy+Guy · · Score: 2

      Finally, she reached Hayden, who was sipping a beer. He suggested she use the pay phone he maintained in the restaurant. She haughtily replied: "I wouldn't be caught dead using a pay phone.

      At Franklin's (the local brewpub) they don't have a traditional payphone, what they have instead is a cellphone for customer use. You just make your call and drop $.50 into a box. A lot of businesses used to maintain payphones for their customers, often as a losing proposition for the business since the Phone Co's charge the biz something like $200/month to have one. At first businesses tried to get around this by instead using the oversized desktop payphones some independents were offering. But with "free" phones and unlimited mobile plans now running about $60 - $70/month I think a lot more places will be doing this. At $60/month it only takes 4 calls a day to break even - plus there is a redundant phone system available in case the main POTS line phones goes down.

  5. Sell them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sell them for people in their homes. The Brady Bunch did this one time to teach the kids a valuable lesson. Even though Mike almost lost a contract because of it, once he explained the situation, he got the contract.

    1. Re:Sell them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you serious? That's sick that you would want own somebody in their home. I'd much rather sell the pay phones for money, so that people could have a pay phone in their homes. I never knew the Brady Bunch were such sick people, doing something like just to teach the kids a lesson.

  6. Without public telephones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Where will Clark Kent change into his Superman costume?!

    1. Re:Without public telephones... by dankwa · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... And HOW will the folks in Matrix get back to their ship when chased by the Agents?

    2. Re:Without public telephones... by Zen+Programmer · · Score: 1

      Uh, by using other hard-wired non-pay phones. I can think of at least 3 instances where they didn't use pay phone.

    3. Re:Without public telephones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can think of one instance where you didn't use your sense of humor.

    4. Re:Without public telephones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but can you think of at least one instance where you actually did anything with a member of the opposite sex?

      Thought not.

    5. Re:Without public telephones... by blugecko · · Score: 1

      Your friendly neighbourhood Nokia kiosk, of course ;-)

      --
      Lysergic Acid Diethylamide, not just chemistry, reality!
    6. Re:Without public telephones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats easy for you since all you have to do is do jack off and you did something with the oppisite sex.

    7. Re:Without public telephones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There he comes, the noble Sir Galahad, riding in to save the day from a factual discussion.

    8. Re:Without public telephones... by Zen+Programmer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You're hilarious. This is an instance where I wish we could meet in real life, and then we could see what a pathetic loser you are compared to me. Alas, this will never happen and that's why you are able to post this crap, but it's reassuring to know who's in the right and who's in the wrong.

      Oh, and don't think that I haven't anticipated you responding with something like "Looks like somebody's sensitive," because I'm not. I'm content with my experience with opposite sex, whereas you're probably some geek just sniping away whilst you wait for your next chance to post first.

    9. Re:Without public telephones... by marcsiry · · Score: 3, Informative

      That was actually a hilarious moment in the first Superman movie- Clark Kent was rushing to change into Superman for his first "public action" (saving Lois from a helicopter disaster) when he stopped and briefly glanced up and down at one of the half-booths common in NYC nowadays (and back in the 70's when the film was made).

      It obviously didn't fit his requirements, as he went on to a revolving door which he spun at super speed to blur his transformation (which seems moot, after opening his shirt in the middle of a crowded street to reveal the Superman "S.")

      Oh well, it's NYC, err, Metropolis-- no one would notice unless he was doing something abberant, like being nice or polite...

      --
      Marc Siry || interactive media professional, motorcycle enthusiast ||
    10. Re:Without public telephones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Metropolis is the DC version of LA.

      Gotham is the NYC-ish town.

      Oh, and Star City is more or less San Fran.

      There are those out there who insist that Metropolis is in Deleware and Gotham is in New Jersey, but what the fuck to they know? Also, in the first Superman comics, Metropolis was obviously Cleveland.

      Nowadays, the location of Metropolis is just kept deliberately vague. Kind of like "Springfield" on the Simpsons being somewhere in fly-over land, but noplace in particular.

      Frank Miller once joked that Metropolis is NYC by day, and Gotham in NYC by night, but he was just being silly.

      Shit. I need a life.

    11. Re:Without public telephones... by welshsocialist · · Score: 1

      In a bathroom, like everyone else.

      --
      Support the Chagossians
    12. Re:Without public telephones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, now that I've met someone like you, I can ask "What IS the opposite sex of none?"

    13. Re:Without public telephones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember one Superman comic in the 70's that showed Supes doing an aerial search of central Metropolis. Funny, it looked just like Manhattan Island.

      Why this confusion? Other superheroes don't have this problem! The Atom is obviously in Harford, CN; the Flash is in Chicago, Professor X is...uh, I think I need a life, too.

  7. The environmental hazard of removing payphones is: by rickthewizkid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... all the spilled oil, gas, antifreeze and other automotive gook from the accidents caused by people using their cell phones while driving...

    -RickTheWizKid
    ..."Just hang up and DRIVE!"

  8. early post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yay im early.
    Remember the episode of the brady bunch where they had to buy a pay phone because the kids were always talking and they couldnt share the phone?

  9. Payfones out the door... by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    Our school just dumped the last of our payphones recently. I didn't know this, but they were actually costing US money!

    With everyone using cell phones now, I guess the call for an occasional pizza wasn't paying for the upkeep of those things.

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:Payfones out the door... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My school has 3 payphones, and during lunch and after school you should see the line of students waiting to use them... sometimes the lines are even longer than the lines at the vending machines. Many students at my school have cell phones, but their phones may be confiscated by the administration if they are used while on school property, so they use the payphones. I used to have a cell phone, but it was too expensive, so I did what many students do; ditch the cell phone and buy a $5 payphone card (20 local calls, isn't Canada wonderful, local payphone calls are 25 cents each).

  10. Leave them in place... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are useful for emergencies.

  11. I'd like to buy a payphone too by jodathmorr · · Score: 1

    There like a part of history! I want one in my room. I'd pay a little for one... Anyone else?

  12. Obscure Future Rama Joke by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe they could replace them with Suicide Booths :)

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

    1. Re:Obscure Future Rama Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I'm sorry. Did "Obscure Future Rama Joke" mean "Stupid Joke"?

    2. Re:Obscure Future Rama Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I very much like your sig. It says it all.

      Mod this sig up!

    3. Re:Obscure Future Rama Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actualy, it's pretty funny if you've seen the show.

      *cough* Slashdot, where everyone is an expert and everyone's opinion is right and everyone else's is wrong.

    4. Re:Obscure Future Rama Joke by Pralix · · Score: 1

      I'd rather them be turned into Orgasmatrons.

    5. Re:Obscure Future Rama Joke by macx666 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Maybe they could replace them with Suicide Booths :)
      Good idea! And they can charge 50 cents for unlimited use too! Oh, wait...
    6. Re:Obscure Future Rama Joke by Alien+Being · · Score: 2

      I'm not getting into that thing. I, I'm strictly a hand operator; you know, I, I... I don't like anything with moving parts that are not my own.

  13. Payphones are too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As development of cell phones got outsourced to India, wits its cheap and skilled labor force, the prices dropped!

  14. Re:I know where they're going by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't she take her husband's last name? Shouldn't it be Kathleen Taco?

  15. You wonder about the wrong thing... by Marton · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... payphones are great to have in an emergency - and there are tens of millions of people in the US w/o a cellphone.

    The real question is: are they going to keep operating those phones that lose them money? Should payphones be thought of as something essential like public transportation, and possibly subsidized by the govt?

    1. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There have been many times I've NEEDED a pay phone while in Europe and been damned glad to find one. What will tourists do if there are none around? My cell phone will not work in Europe. Am I supposed to buy a cell phone and sign a one-year contract just so I can call taxis, arrange lodging, and make restaurant reservations during a one-week trip? Perhaps a government subsidy is appropriate.

    2. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      . payphones are great to have in an emergency - and there are tens of millions of people in the US w/o a cellphone.

      But they don't count. Emergency services are there to protect the lives and property of rich people only.

    3. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 2, Informative
      ... payphones are great to have in an emergency - and there are tens of millions of people in the US w/o a cellphone.

      If you just want the convenience and safety though there are tons of plans for pay-as-you-go. Buy some minutes up front and leave it around for an emergency. If you just need it for 911 then just get someone's old disconnected phone like the battered women's shelters do for people since they can still dial 911. Now, as I think about it, I've not used a payphone since I got a cell phone. Hell, I never have any change for the payphone anyway and it'd be easier to just borrow someone else's phone for a minute if you're in a group and give them a buck or two for the convenience. Payphones carry diseases and god knows what else on them. It'd be like putting a public urinal up to my mouth when you make a phone call. No thanks!

    4. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd be like putting a public urinal up to my mouth when you make a phone call.

      You don't have to put the thing in your mouth you know. As long as you aren't licking it you should be okay. Holding the handset is another story altogether.

    5. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by DuctTape · · Score: 1
      Payphones carry diseases and god knows what else on them. It'd be like putting a public urinal up to my mouth when you make a phone call. No thanks!

      Not too far from the truth: the article mentions that people (women?) would sometimes urinate on pay phones. And I can rmember a movie or two where the protagonist would always pull out a hankie to handle a pay phone handset with.

      I'm waiting for the disappearance of the office phone, which may happen sooner than later, esp. with corporate rightsizing.

      --
      Is this thing on? Hello?
    6. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by vegetablespork · · Score: 2
      Buy some minutes up front and leave it around for an emergency.

      That doesn't work with any of the prepaid plans I've looked at in an effort to supply one less outgoing monthly revenue stream to the telecommunications industry.

      If you just need it for 911 then just get someone's old disconnected phone like the battered women's shelters do for people since they can still dial 911.

      This works, although the cell phone companies would rather it not be general knowledge.

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    7. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Tons of poor people have cell phones. (This is a symptom of the cause of their poverty.)

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    8. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by newt · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Should payphones be thought of as something essential like public transportation, and possibly subsidized by the govt?

      They are in most countries (either directly as a public service, or indirectly as a consequence of the fact that the Government usually owns the phone company).

      It's only in the US that payphones depend on the corporate whim of a for-profit company.

      - mark

      --

      -----
      I tried an internal modem, but it hurt when I walked.

    9. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by sabNetwork · · Score: 1

      This was moderated as +3 Insightful?

    10. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by ChrisKnight · · Score: 2

      "If you just need it for 911 then just get someone's old disconnected phone like the battered women's shelters do for people since they can still dial 911."

      No longer true. I gave my old analog phone to a friend to take with him on a road trip, thinking he could dial 911 without an account. Fortunatly, before he left, he tried dialing 911. He was directed to an operator who wanted to assist him in setting up an account. He was told that they did not provide 911 service to phones without accounts. I was surprised that there wasn't a law somewhere that compelled them to provide 911 service, but apparently there isn't.

      -Chris

      --
      -- This sig is only a test. If this were a real sig it would say something witty. --
    11. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by GalionTheElf · · Score: 1

      I know this is going a bit OT but if the US had GSM, you could just get a pre-paid account, which start here (in Belgium) for about ~25 EUR and that gives you between 12 and 25 call credit. That even includes roaming in most of Europe with all operators here.

      --
      I'm going over here and I don't know why!
    12. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by hendridm · · Score: 1

      > Tons of poor people have cell phones. (This is a symptom of the cause of their poverty.)

      I'm glad someone else noticed. I know someone who can never pay her electric and cable bill, yet every few months she seems to upgrade to the latest PDA cell phone and buys elaborate outfits for those rennaissance festivals. And this person has kids. Lack of priorities?

      I've noticed this elsewhere too. Seems like some people are poor for a reason (but certainly not all, as I wasn't doing so well for a period and I was working my ass off looking for a job). Ok, now I'm sounding like my shit doesn't stink, but whatev.

    13. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by seann · · Score: 1

      i'm sure if the dude said "i'm dying, please have a cab sent to 7489 riverdale cres, archyland, or put me on the phone with a 911 dispatch."
      they would comply..
      imagine the legal battle
      "17 year old, high school cheerleader with beautiful blond locks dies, telemarketer refuses to dial for help."
      PR Nightmare.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    14. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by jwilcox154 · · Score: 1

      If you just want the convenience and safety though there are tons of plans for pay-as-you-go.

      Yeah, who would be willing to pay between $100 and $200 for a Pre-Pay Cell Phone and pay $30 for about a half hour of talk time? I sure wouldn't pay that kind of money.

    15. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by IndependentVik · · Score: 1

      . . . yet every few months she seems to upgrade to the latest PDA cell phone and buys elaborate outfits for those rennaissance festivals. And this person has kids. Lack of priorities?

      You bet there's a lack of priorities. I mean, ren fairs? Talk about a freak ;)

      --
      I'd suggest you don't use Slashdot as your only news source, or you will suffer permanent brain damage.
    16. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by taion · · Score: 2

      I'm surprised there isn't a law somewhere that compels you not to call 911 unless you have a good reason to.

      --

      ----------
      Floccinaucinihilipilification - the action or habit of judging something to be worthless
    17. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wrongo, Motorolo collects a LOT of phones, regardless of brand for this purpose.

    18. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And Motorola is a cell phone manufacturer, not a carrier. I should have said "cell phone carriers would rather this not be general knowledge."

      --vegetablespork

    19. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by Dan+Crash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh, please.

      Next you'll be telling me that poor people having telephones at all is a criminal mismanagement of funds. I can't imagine why poor people would waste their cash on something as frivolous as a mobile phone. Certainly not to check their messages during the day and try to get a more lucrative job. How absurd! And God forbid a mother should want her children to be able to reach her when they need her, even if she's on the bus.

      Cell phones were once exclusively for the very rich. Now they're not. Deal with it.

      --
      He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
    20. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      You're talking about lack of priorities yet your post equates her electric bill with her cable bill?

      Electric bill, fine - that's important... but cable is just another (costly!) entertainment expense.

    21. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by tswinzig · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They are in most countries (either directly as a public service, or indirectly as a consequence of the fact that the Government usually owns the phone company).

      It's only in the US that payphones depend on the corporate whim of a for-profit company.


      You make it sound like its a bad thing.

      Why should my tax money go to help someone loser make a free phone call?

      I don't have a problem with the government installing emergency phone booths that are wired to 911 for things like that, but I'll pass on footing the bill for someone else's calls... they get enough of my money as it is!

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    22. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

      You can do all that with the cell phone Verizon gives you free with the service just as well as with the $200 model with internet, "bleeping" (the scourge of the earth), Java support, and small-penis-size compensator. You can also get messages on an answering machine, and for millions of years kids got along just fine without being able to call their mommies from anywhere on Earth.

      Here is an anecdote illustrating for you the "cause" I am talking about. I was eating lunch in the high school cafeteria some years ago. A kid comes up to me and asks me to let him have a few dollars. (Another "symptom" - this type of people will never ask to *BORROW* money, they always want handouts.) I asked him what he needed the money for and he said, "I'm poor! I ain't got money for lunch!" So I told him, "Get a job to earn some lunch money." He replied, "I have a job, but I spent all the money yesterday on my new jacket!" I told him he could fuck off and go hungry. (Before you say it: His old jacket was perfectly servicable, but the manufacturer had come out with a new one with an even bigger logo.)

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    23. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

      Which ren faires? I'm up at the New York faire, maybe I've seen her.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    24. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow wonders never cease, the post seems to be written by someone who is not a bleeding heart liberal or a Euro on Slashdot.

    25. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by SN74S181 · · Score: 1
      Payphones carry diseases and god knows what else on them.


      You mean all those telephone sanitizers they sent off on the first ship really were essential??
    26. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by kweiske · · Score: 1

      There's no problem with testing 911 functionality, just tell the dispatcher you're testing the line.

      As a telco manager, I did it all the time.

      Would you rather wait until you need to talk to an E911 operator to find out it doesn't work?

    27. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by TC+(WC) · · Score: 1

      Of course, you ignore the fact that cell phones have now, in some places, become *cheaper* than land lines...

    28. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

      Good point, good point. I don't think this is the prevalent situation in most of the U.S. yet, though.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    29. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by Trepalium · · Score: 1
      If you just want the convenience and safety though there are tons of plans for pay-as-you-go. Buy some minutes up front and leave it around for an emergency.
      Most pay-as-you-go or prepaid plans I've seen make you pay for minutes up front, and if you don't use them within a given time period (usually one to three months), they expire, and you've got to pay again. I'd gladly have a prepaid cell phone if it wasn't for this tiny little problem.

      Payphones carry diseases and god knows what else on them.
      Do you use doors, gasoline pumps, or public bathrooms?
      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
    30. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by Corgha · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why should my tax money go to help someone loser make a free phone call?

      Uhh.... who said anything about free calls? They're called pay phones for a reason, you know.

      If you're OK with installing and maintaining phones that can call 911 for free, why not also let people put money in them to call other numbers while the phones would otherwise just be sitting around, doing nothing? They'd be hooked up to the phone network anyway, since a dedicated line to the 911 call center would be needlessly expensive.

      Sure, maybe those pay calls would be in some sense "subsidized phone calls", but much less so that a car ride just about anywhere is a "subsidized car ride." Somehow I doubt that the cost of subsidizing pay phones would ever come close to that of the massive pork barrel that is the federal-aid highway system (or that we'd ever invade Kazakhstan to secure our chromium supply for those cool little keypad buttons).

      That, of course, is the original poster's point -- that perhaps pay phones should be considered a part of the public infrastructure.

    31. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by JohnFluxx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It is indeed a very interesting subject - one of which you have barely scraped the surface.

      My dad was a postman, and he used to tell me that almost all the junk mail that was delivered was delivered to the poorest estates. For it was the poorest of the council estates that were buying new TV's, new sofas etc.

      I've noticed this over and over again - lower class people mismanaging money, owning huge tv's, expensive sofas etc. The (few) middle class people I knew either didn't have a tv or had a really cheap one. (Although they did take expensive holidays etc.) Expensive cars seem to fit into both categories.

      Why does it seem that lower class people are more prone to consumerism? I don't know - perhaps a mixture of no education, depression (just don't care anymore), environment, etc.

      Btw, has anyone heard of any studies of comparision of intelligence between upper, middle, and lower class? (I'm aware of the lack of clear divides etc)

      p.s. - I'm very much in the lower (or is it 'working' class), so don't take this as arrogance.

    32. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "Not too far from the truth: the article mentions that people (women?) would sometimes urinate on pay phones. And I can rmember a movie or two where the protagonist would always pull out a hankie to handle a pay phone handset with."

      Maybe my imagination is not so vivid or something, but can anyone please explain exactly how the idea to urinate on a public phone would enter someone's mind, and why they would do it on a phone as opposed to, say bushes, or in a washroom? It just seems completely illogical.

    33. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by Doctor+Hu · · Score: 1
      Should payphones be thought of as something essential like public transportation, and possibly subsidized by the govt?
      ... It's only in the US that payphones depend on the corporate whim of a for-profit company.
      I wouldn't call it a whim, and the issue exists outside the US, too, and for the same reasons.

      Concerning the 'essential service' aspect, in many countries we're probably approaching the stage where it will be cheaper to subsidise individual phone installations where they are genuinely essential to people who cannot readily afford them (I'm thinking mainly of the elderly and the isolated) rather than a smaller number of public payphones, given that these have to be more toughly constructed and regularly visited for checking and emptying of their coin safes.

    34. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 2

      "You can also get messages on an answering machine, and for millions of years kids got along just fine without being able to call their mommies from anywhere on Earth."

      For thousands of years people got along without transportation, electricity, language...

      By your logic, the world should cease to change from now on because everything in some way or another 'works'.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    35. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by stevey · · Score: 1

      <ObSimpsons>The real number is 912</ObSimpsons>

    36. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

      I was using a bit of hyperbole. By millions of years, I mean "two years ago."

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    37. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by jez9999 · · Score: 2

      Now, as I think about it, I've not used a payphone since I got a cell phone.

      I have, for this reason: the battery ran out on my mobile phone. I usually use it for stuff now rather than payphones, but they really need to sort the battery issue out. On the Nokia ones especially, it can be on 1 bar for ages and you never know when the damn thing's gonna run out or needs recharging. Payphones are needed still for emergencies when the mobile breaks.

    38. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by jez9999 · · Score: 2

      That's HELLA generous for this country (UK) :-) Double those figures and you've got the costs of our PAYG services!

    39. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I doubt he/she puts any of those close to his/her mouth.

    40. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by alienw · · Score: 2

      If it's a 911 emergency phone, do you want people yakking away on it while someone is having an emergency? Brilliant.

    41. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by tswinzig · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uhh.... who said anything about free calls? They're called pay phones for a reason, you know.

      The original poster intimated that other countries pay for the phones.

      Setting that aside for a moment, even if the government only paid to maintain them, that is much more maintenance than an emergency phone.

      If you're OK with installing and maintaining phones that can call 911 for free, why not also let people put money in them to call other numbers while the phones would otherwise just be sitting around, doing nothing? They'd be hooked up to the phone network anyway, since a dedicated line to the 911 call center would be needlessly expensive.

      - Emergency phones don't require as much hardware. They can be a single button you press and talk into a microphone, like what appear on many campuses across America.

      - Emergency phones don't need to be stopped by every day to gather the change.

      - Emergency phones don't need to be repaired as much because they're not used as much.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    42. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid Capitalism!

    43. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verizon prepay with 110 minutes and wireless internet is $90 bucks here with the phone. Alltel is $70 Bucks and cingular is $60 all with 100 minutes + with the phone. All include nokia or kyrocera phones.

      Prepaid is not expensive in the southern us.

    44. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 2

      Why should my tax money go to help someone loser make a free phone call?

      Because that loser could be you!! Life will catch you by suprise, when it really shouldn't.

    45. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by Corgha · · Score: 2

      get real.

      Have you ever heard of this problem on current pay phones?

      If you're actually having an emergency, and someone is standing nearby, on the phone or not, they are more likely to call 911 for you or attempt to assist you than to stand there and stare at you while you bleed to death.

    46. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by nickname1 · · Score: 1

      Sorry to contradict you but the UK has lost many of its payphones, owned/operated by several large operators. The only company to operate them now (AFAIK) is BT, who despite an obligation to provide universal coverage seems to remove callboxes rather than replace them after damage. This old link is still slightly relevant... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/896117.stm

    47. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have a problem with the government installing emergency phone booths that are wired to 911 for things like that, but I'll pass on footing the bill for someone else's calls... they get enough of my money as it is!

      That's actually not a bad idea - your state's DOT can probably buy a thousand or so used payphones cheaply, and set them up along the interstates to use as emergency phones. They'd have to be cheaper than the dedicated phones I've seen in places.

      Just like on the Autobahn! (but without the machts-nichts sticks)

    48. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by mkweise · · Score: 1

      Emergency phones don't need to be repaired as much because they're not used as much.

      Use doesn't cause payphones to need repairs, vandalism does.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the War Room!
  16. Recycling impact? by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder what kind of environmental hazard is posed by junking thousands of pay phones?

    Ummmm. How about approximately 0? How many pay phones per person? Like 1/100 at best. Now think about all of the diapers and soda bottles and old tires and other crap that people throw out without thinking. There are things worth worrying about and then there is the noise.

    As for getting rid of pay phones, I'm fine with it. I mean, when was the last time you saw a working pay phone?

    --
    I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
    1. Re:Recycling impact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Insightful? Since when?

      You make the claim that the environmental hazard is 0 by saying that there are other things that contribute to environmental hazards. How is that answering the question? Just because there are things that are worse doesn't mean you shouldn't take this into consideration too.

      Bill: Hey Bob, why did you just spray all those cans of hair spray out into the air?
      Bob: Who cares? Think about all the diapers and soda bottles and old tires and other crap that people throw out without thinking. There are things worth worrying about and then there is the noise.
      Bill: You sure got me there.

      Right. Real insightful.

    2. Re:Recycling impact? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Perhaps a more direct metaphor is in order: You're picking up litter in a burning building.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    3. Re:Recycling impact? by radicalsubversiv · · Score: 2

      As for getting rid of pay phones, I'm fine with it. I mean, when was the last time you saw a working pay phone?

      Last week. I even called someone on it.

    4. Re:Recycling impact? by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 2

      Insightful? Since when?

      It's called pragmatism. Look into it. I was simply pointing out that it's somewhat hypocritical to get bent out of shape about pay phones (which you will note, I said is approximately zero as in insignificant) because of all the much more insignificant crap that everyone (including you, yes you) don't bitch about because it's too damn hard to give them up. Now you will right a response about how you live in an igloo made of recycled tires and diapers and only eat food you grew from your own garden.

      Now, honestly, do you really thing that the small # of recycled pay phones is seriously worthy of any social discussion?

      --
      I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
    5. Re:Recycling impact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In A.D. 2101...

      Captain: What is small metal plastic edifice in middle of all our base?
      Operator: We get payphone.
      Captain: What!
      Mechanic: Because in A.D. 2002 they did not want to set up it the garbage.
      Operator: It was on the way to pollution!!
      Captain: Ah so there was it left, so not to move it.
      Operator: They did not take off every payphone!!
      Captain They know what they doing! At least they did not make pollute!!
      CATS: YOU HAVE NO CHANCE TO SURVIVE, MAKE YOUR TIME, BITCH!!

    6. Re:Recycling impact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder what kind of environmental hazard is posed by junking thousands of pay phones?

      Just dump it in Jersey with the rest of our trash. The state is there for a reason people.

  17. This reminds me... by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I recently opened the Back to the Future DVD trilogy and watched the second movie, there was one scene where Marty Jr. was using some kind of futuristic-looking pay phone. I laughed to myself and said, "I guess they didn't see the end of that one coming!"

    1. Re:This reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blade Runner has a video pay phone scene..

    2. Re:This reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for your useful link. I did not know that the second movie in the Back to the Future trilogy was actually the movie "Back to the Future Part II". I learned something today.

  18. Pretty soon by TerryAtWork · · Score: 2

    A lot of the young kids here on /. will be saying - 'I'm old enough to remember payphones'...

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
    1. Re:Pretty soon by Stoptional · · Score: 1

      Fom the generation that gave the world "The Brady Bunch" _and_ can quote relevant episodes.

      At least in _MY_ day we could quote umm, well, we could quote ahhh, Dylan! Yeah - we could quote Dylan and nobody ever knew what we were talking about either!

      --
      Stoptional
  19. Outside line? by Andorion · · Score: 2

    Pay phones still have some use... doesn't anyone watch The Sopranos?

    -Berj

    1. Re:Outside line? by outsider007 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pay phones still have some use... doesn't anyone watch The Sopranos?

      is it where they change into their gangster clothes?

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    2. Re:Outside line? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Anonymous telephone calls are a thing of the past. Drug dealers and terrorist will have to look for a new communication device. Oh yeah....

    3. Re:Outside line? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      look here for your anonymous cell phones. if you buy them in the stores they don't check id or anything, they just ask you nicely to give them your name and address, and they accept cash.

    4. Re:Outside line? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or.. you could call the President on one in case of a nuclear attack. Just remember exact change, or bring something to break open a Coke machine :O

  20. I've had one for years by Zen+Programmer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It's called a Cheese Box. L33t Phr34k0rz

  21. Payphone Disposal by newt_sd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How come this always gets brought up on slashdot?
    How is junking old phones any different then any other waste? Are there uranium pay phones out there? Admit it the u.s. wastes tons pay phone is a tiny tiny part of a very larger picture

    --
    ***I GOT NUTHIN***
    1. Re:Payphone Disposal by hitzroth · · Score: 4, Funny

      But.. but.. but.. telcoms equipment is sacred! Disposal must be accompanied by the appropriate rituals! /me prays to Tesla's ghost to carry the electrons and route the lost calls to their proper parties.

      --
      In mathematics, one does not understand things, one merely gets used to them.
      --VonNeumann
    2. Re:Payphone Disposal by Gorphrim · · Score: 1

      (offtopic)

      regarding your sig...

      do you mean discretion rather than discression?

      --

      Queens of the Stone Age - they rule
  22. Environment by Z0mb1eman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >I wonder what kind of environmental hazard is posed by junking thousands of pay phones

    Probably not worse than the millions of home phones that break down or are replaced by newer models. And DEFINITELY not worse than the millions of cell phones - and proprietary batteries - that are starting to be thrown out (what was the statistic I read? Kids in Japan who keep up with "fashion" replace their cell phone every 3 months, and in North America every 18 months? I know, I know, no link, no proof, etc... whatever.)

    --
    ClutterMe.com - easiest site creation on the Net. Just click and type.
    1. Re:Environment by Patik · · Score: 3, Insightful
      the millions of cell phones - and proprietary batteries - that are starting to be thrown out ... Kids in Japan who keep up with "fashion" replace their cell phone every 3 months
      How about the phones that are thrown out when someone changes plans and the new service provider forces them to buy one of their phones?
    2. Re:Environment by MulluskO · · Score: 2

      Anyone know if the companies will make any attempt to sell these thousands of phones before throwning them out? I think it would be great to clean one up, install it as a home phone. If they are to be discarded, I think they should be really inexpensive.

      --

      Too busy staying alive... ~ R.A.
    3. Re:Environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct about the high cell phone turnover rate in Japan. I work for a semiconductor company that makes a very nice chunk of change from all the people in Japan who think of cell phones as "fashion" and buy them so frequently.

      It's horribly wasteful and I don't see the logic in it, but I suppose it's one of those differences between cultures.

    4. Re:Environment by richie2000 · · Score: 2
      I think it would be great to clean one up, install it as a home phone.

      I sense a case mod in here somewhere. :-)

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    5. Re:Environment by MulluskO · · Score: 2

      Great idea, now I need two.

      --

      Too busy staying alive... ~ R.A.
    6. Re:Environment by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "How about the phones that are thrown out when someone changes plans and the new service provider forces them to buy one of their phones?"

      This is stupid. When you change phones / plans, you should get a credit for the old hardware. On telus mobility in Canada, my dad just bought a new phone to replace his really ancient one from ~1996 because the display was failing. He still got a $25 credit for it and the phone went to proper disposal and recovery of recoverable parts.

    7. Re:Environment by stephenbooth · · Score: 2

      Most places here in the UK will give you a trade in discount on your old phone when you upgrade.

      Alternatively buy a Pay-As-You-Go simm and keep it as a back up or give it to a relative who can't afford the initial purchase price but could get good use from a mobile phone. That's what I've done with my old phones. Prior to getting a mobile phone my mother couldn't see the point. Now she's addicted to texting and loves it.

      Stephen

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
    8. Re:Environment by Kanasta · · Score: 2

      cellphones break down so easily. Mine, the screen's going fuzzy after exactly 2yrs. Funny, my contract was 2yrs too...

      I've only ever dropped it once and I only use it enough to need a charge every 3-4days.

    9. Re:Environment by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      i was going to mention that. it'd be such a cool idea i think. everyone has that "cool room" in their house with a variety of interesting things. a pay phone would make it pretty cool. kind of like in the movie funny farm. :) and maybe you could invite some stupid friends over who'd actually pay to use your phone and you'd make some money. or it could just be a useful piggy bank. :) like those toy slot machines. you don't actually have to put quarters in it to use it, but you can if you want. they can just change the lock mechanism on it so that it uses a general key to open up the change compartment. i'd buy one.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
  23. Too bad.. by FuzzyMan45 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    the payphone out in the Middle of Nowhere already disappeared. Here is a link to the going-away of it and why. Basically, the National Park Service and the Mojave National Preserve thought that there would be too much environmental impact if the booth remained too much longer.

    --Fuzz

    1. Re:Too bad.. by susano_otter · · Score: 2
      That is too bad, and I can understand why people are so upset. Like the article says, the fact that the number still rings seems especially cruel.

      But the last line of the article really caught my attention.

      "If I had to do this all over again, I would do it very differently," he said. "I would keep it very, very quiet."

      This I don't understand at all. Sure, the Pay Phone in the Middle of Nowhere is gone, but there are still many functional pay phones out there.

      Why not pick an arbitrary payphone on some New York street corner, and start calling it? And don't keep it quiet, either--publicize it just as much as the first one. It's bound to be interesting, and fun, even if it isn't the same as calling the original phone.

      Better yet, he could have a "pay phone of the month": select a different arbitrary pay phone each month. Imagine the people flocking to call it, and the people flocking to answer it.

      It's a simple concept, but I don't think he's even begun to explore its full potential. The original phone had a certain stark beauty to it, but it should be viewed as the beginning, not the be-all and end-all. The end will come when there are no pay phones left to call.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    2. Re:Too bad.. by Bowling+Moses · · Score: 1

      Yeah it's gone, but not before my boss while on vacation called my lab from it. Luckily there was one person not playing hooky who was there to answer it. I have a goofy boss. Anyway another site on it can be found here.

  24. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by kevcol · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I only agree if the cell user is not using a headset and using a phone with special hands free dialing features. Otherwise, we might as well ban conversation between 2 or more occupants of a car.

  25. Re:I know where they're going by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Didn't she take her husband's last name? Shouldn't it be Kathleen Taco?

    They got married in a Las Vegas chapel and she had to make her way there in a taxi cab. What do YOU think. Her mother was probably like: "Look, if the dipshit has any VA Software money leftover, take him for it but christ, don't go all the way into changing your name when you know you're just going to get divorced."

  26. Practical use for the remaining telephone lines? by oakestv · · Score: 1

    Is there a use for all that wiring that will be left behind by removing lots of payphones? I know eventually it just becomes a phone co. trunk line... Is there any value to these access lines to the trunk? How about pay-per-use DSL?

    Am I just dreaming?

  27. Less Than Junking All Those Cell Phones by Tremblay99 · · Score: 1
    I wonder what kind of environmental hazard is posed by junking thousands of pay phones?

    I'd bet that all those cell phones people junk every year or two are far, far worse for the environment.

    1. Re:Less Than Junking All Those Cell Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was probably just a knee-jerk reaction to the word "disposal".

      What effect will this have on the environment?

  28. I can remember by Regul8or · · Score: 2, Funny

    the last time I used a payphone I was playing quarter tones into it trying to trick the operator into giving me a free phone call. Also stuffing the coin returns. What else are you supposed to do in high school?

    1. Re:I can remember by TalonKarrde989 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm....true enough. Everyone does that sort of a thing at one point or another

  29. Makes a Swell Christmas Gift by mistermund · · Score: 1

    For the phone phreaker on your list this holiday season.

  30. Just don't make em like they used to.. by marcushnk · · Score: 1

    I guess that might have something to do with the sharp decline in Superhero's.. I meant if we take away their natural habitat.....

    --
    "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
  31. I wouldn't be caught dead using a payphone by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
    I hope she remembers that right after she is mugged, brutally beaten and raped in an alley. I'm guessing she'll be glad to see one then. Oops! Where did they all go?

    I'm thinking that payphone operators are making it harder to get a call thru, and subsequently lose your 50 cents. I came across a phone that took 1.50 from me on busy signals! No other phone was to be found (this was a half mile from the U of MN)

    I was pissed. If I had been driving my big shitty van, I would've GTA'd the fucker in a heartbeat. Enjoy my illgotten buck fifty, phone bastards.

    1. Re:I wouldn't be caught dead using a payphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are other, more primitive forms of phone vandalism, y'know. just shove some shit in the coin slot, so nobody else gets their money taken. it's a public service!

    2. Re:I wouldn't be caught dead using a payphone by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Since when do they install payphones in alleys? Every one I've seen has been on the front of a building or by itself under a light in an open parking lot. BTW payphones here are still 35 cents, you're getting ripped off. I'd rather carry around a few coins instead of a phone that needs charging and doesn't work in certain areas.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    3. Re:I wouldn't be caught dead using a payphone by Hadlock · · Score: 2

      unfortunately, i live in texas, where it is rare/unheard of to see an enclosed telephone booth, the ones here are open air for the most part. i'd much rather get the satisfaction of getting my $1.50 back, and unbolted the booth from the concrete slab it sat on and driven away with it tied to my roof. been looking for a good booth to steal to put in the apartment as of late...

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    4. Re:I wouldn't be caught dead using a payphone by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      35?? i've never seen one that wasn't only 25 cents for a local call... and that's canadian currency too...

      Reece,

    5. Re:I wouldn't be caught dead using a payphone by andyf · · Score: 1

      Was it the phone booth at Como & 15th? That's one of the few booths I know of still around in Minneapolis anymore. The only other one in NE I can think of off the top of my head is on Lowry.

      --

      Photos of bits of the past hiding in the present: afiler.com
  32. Turn them into WiFi access points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Bell Canada has announced that they are converting some of their thousands of pay phones into 802.11 access points to extend their new WiFi service offering. WiFi-only companies like FatPort would be wise to follow suit. PayPhones are in the best possible locations for WiFi -- think AirPorts, hotel lobbies, train stations...

    1. Re:Turn them into WiFi access points by monkeyboy87 · · Score: 1

      This is just a brilliant idea. My ipaq would be so much happier. I guess the problem now is getting Bell to fund the physical plant after they blew all thier capital on "new media" and VOD efforts... heck even using these things to improve cell coverage would be a boon

  33. Environmental hazard? by Milinar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No more of a threat than everyone having to buy a new cell phone every freakin' year.

    -Milinar

  34. This is real simple actually ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 2
    ... People are using the payphones less, therefore demand has gone down so price has gone up. My cell's battery went dead the other day and I needed to make a local call, so I headed to the payphone, $0.55 to make a Local 2 minute call!!

    Think about it, that's 25 cents a minute, most cellular phone contractual plans are LOWER than this price.

    Here's the irony of the story, I didn't have any change either, so I stopped a gentleman to ask him for some change to use the phone, he said he was on his lunch break and had no problem with me using his phone.

    I think the saying "everyone has a cell phone" is wrong, but not so untrue, like the computer most people have at least one in their family, if not three or four.

    Moral of the story, I got a car charger now and don't try to see if the lithium ion battery can hold a charge for more than 4 days. Totally off topic but motorolla's new phones with a Lithium Ion battery are hella nice and last a rather long time (just not longer than 4 days).

    In closing of a long post, it's the price of the payphone that has made them less appealing, and what gets me even more is most of these phone companies who supply payphones ALSO have a division that supply celluar phones. So they really aren't "losing" money as a whole, just certain departments.

    I say more emergency solar based Cell Phones Stations on Highways, Interstates, and Rest Stops because technically Cell Phones have to be free when dialing emergency numbers, and being solar you can put them anywhere.

    I'm sure "phreakers" and 2600 will be upset though...

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:This is real simple actually ... by rsborg · · Score: 2
      Here's the irony of the story, I didn't have any change either, so...[snip]

      Hmmm don't you think payphone use has gone down because people can't be bothered to carry change? I sure as hell don't... and hell with pulling out my credit card and typing in 20+ more digits. In the convenience society in which we live, the payphone is altmodish.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    2. Re:This is real simple actually ... by unclelib · · Score: 1
      People are using the payphones less, therefore demand has gone down so price has gone up

      Wait a minute...

      But won't increasing prices by like 100% or so kinda drive demand down even further? That might not be the best way to improve your business.

      *Disclaimer: i am not a harvard-trained economist*

    3. Re:This is real simple actually ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      economics : demand goes down, price goes down. As demand rises, price goes up. As scarce items are harder to find, people are willing to pay more for them. You have it bacwards!!

    4. Re:This is real simple actually ... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "Totally off topic but motorolla's new phones with a Lithium Ion battery are hella nice and last a rather long time (just not longer than 4 days)."

      FYI: Motorola has sold hand-winding chargers for some phones (eg the v.6X series) for at least several months now.

  35. Re-use? by FyRE666 · · Score: 2

    Why not just turn them into toilets, and handy pinboards for ladies of the night to ply their wares? Oh wait...

  36. Well... by tuxlove · · Score: 1

    If everyone's using cell phones and nobody is using pay phones any more, why not just put cell phones at every street corner instead?

    :) :)

    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We already have cell phones at every street corner. They're called drug dealers. Sheesh. Get with the times man!

  37. Don't trash; upgrade! by adamp3 · · Score: 4, Interesting
  38. I wonder by Alethes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How will we make anonymous calls without a payphone?

    1. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By stealing someones cellphone and then ditching it in the river after making your call. Don't you watch TV?

    2. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cloning cell-phones

    3. Re:I wonder by bribass · · Score: 1
      How will we make anonymous calls without a payphone?
      What is this "anonymous" you speak of?
    4. Re:I wonder by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      How will we make anonymous calls without a payphone?

      When all the payphones are gone, an anonymous call could only be coming ... from INSIDE the house!
      GET OUT NOW!

    5. Re:I wonder by hitzroth · · Score: 2

      How will we make anonymous calls without a payphone?

      We won't. In any case, Alethes, what's so bad about not being anonymous if nobody is anonymous.
      --
      In mathematics, one does not understand things, one merely gets used to them.
      --VonNeumann
    6. Re:I wonder by K8Fan · · Score: 2
      How will we make anonymous calls without a payphone?

      Absolutely. Everyone needs anonymity once in a while...calling about a job that might be your current employer...psycho ex-girlfriends...harassing spammers at home...all sorts of things.

      Personally, I've avoided getting a cell phone and have managed just fine so far. They are expensive, especially now that no providers are offering truly unlimited minutes any more (my brother is "grandfathered" into an unlimited plan and averages 3000+ minutes a month). I'm a consultant and I'd never get a moments peace if I had a cell. I just explain that I don't have one, they can call my pager.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    7. Re:I wonder by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      How will we make anonymous calls without a payphone?

      Don't worry, I'll just your cell phone when you're not looking.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    8. Re:I wonder by OttoM · · Score: 3, Insightful
      How will we make anonymous calls without a payphone?

      1. Go to a phone shop (or supermarket, or toy store, anywhere)
      2. Buy a prepaid phone.
      3. Make your call. Do not forget to switch off sending caller ID.
      Here in the Netherlands (and the rest of Europe) a very large part (>50%) of mobile phones are prepaid. No subscription or ID required.

      If you are under 18, you cannot get a subscription, so you'll have to use a prepaid phone, or convince your parents to get a subscription for you.

    9. Re:I wonder by xombo · · Score: 1

      It is like the government wants us to have no privacy at all, first tracking our internet connections, now we can't make anonymous calls, next they will get rid of public mailboxes! Somtimes it is nice to have a little privacy, at least UK ISPs said they won't spy. I wish we had a bill of rights or somthing in America. I am 15, if I have children, I don't want them to ask me, "Dad, how come the government watches us 24/7?". I also hope I don't have children in the forseeable future :)

    10. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are expensive, especially now that no providers are offering truly unlimited minutes any more

      I thought this was the case, but I was looking into jumping over to AT&T's GSM service, and they are running a promo of unlimited anytime calls for $99.99/month. But yes, expensive.

  39. Don't Junk, Re-Purpose by ryanisflyboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Rather than throw out all those pay phones, I think it would be much more interesting to see them reused. Perhaps as 802.11 access points or something. Just replace the phone with a digital pay box with an antenna on top. Simply swipe your credit card, hook into the network, and roam around with 20 or 30 minutes of wireless access.

    1. Re:Don't Junk, Re-Purpose by pauljlucas · · Score: 2
      Perhaps as 802.11 access points or something.
      And who would use such an access point especially while being forced either to stand or sit on the sidewalk?

      Nobody needs to check e-mail that badly. This would never make any money.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
  40. Oh jeez.. by kaoshin · · Score: 1

    I started reading from the bottom, and when you said junking pay phones I thought you meant people were making spam calls to payphones (hoping people would pick up I guess). Gosh, I hope I didn't give anyone any ideas with that. I need sleep...

  41. Re:Interesting. Unlike your comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And who gives a shit if you haven't ? Go back wanking your weeny little thing, moron.

  42. limited coverage by tr0tsky · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are still vast regions of the country that have limited cell phone coverage, especially for newer networks that provide high(er)-speed wireless data services.

    I recently switched cell phone providers from Verizon to T-Mobile so I could utilize their GPRS/GSM-based wireless internet service on my laptop (~115Kbps) using my new bluetooth-enabled phone. While CDMA coverage in the U.S. is rather extensive, the GPRS networks that AT&T and T-Mobile have deployed are still very much confined to highly-populated regions of the country.

    There I was in Westchester County, NY (about 50 miles N of Manhattan) trying to locate a client's office and imagine my frustration when my brand new GPRS-based phone was out of range. I had to stop at a supermarket and find enough change to call from a payphone - it saved my day.

    1. Re:limited coverage by John+Murray · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Lets not forget there are still vast regions of the us with NO cell phone coverage at all. If you actually look at many providers coverage maps, in much of country you will only find cell service along interstates.

      If mobile phones become even more common, it might be time for the government to step in and force cell companies to provide true national coverage with decent capacity for calls. One way to do this could be, placing requirements on building permits for new cell installations, requiring as condition of approval. The other problem is many cells are all ready overloaded with normal call volumes, hopefully additional requirements could be made to force cell providers to have extra capacity, for emergencies, etc.

    2. Re:limited coverage by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      Why on earth should the government regulate this? It seems similar to suggesting that as rail transport becomes more popular, the government should force national railroad coverage. Or that the government should force the telcos to deploy true national broadband coverage.

      How about this: as cell phones become more popular, the service providers will accumulate enough revenue to put in more cells and better capacity. As cell phones become more popular, the demand for coverage in remote areas will grow, until it becomes good business to put cells out there.

      Once the demand is high enough, the providers will increase the coverage freely, without government intervention, because they know people will pay for it--enough people to make the added coverage profitable.

      And if the demand isn't there yet, but the government forces the issue anyway? Who will pay for it? We already know the consumers won't pay for it, because if they would, the phone companies would have done it on their own. We know the providers won't want to pay for it, since they know that without demand they'd only be losing money. So the government would have to pay for it--which means we'd have to pay for it. My taxes would end up paying for a cell deep in the Ozarks that nobody wants or needs or cares about. Or the government would convince the providers to pay for it after all, probably with subsidies (my taxes, again), or concessions that would grant the providers even greater power to exploit the citizenry--the citizenry that doesn't even want true national coverage yet.

      Or the government might entice cell phone providers with subsidies--and the caveat that the Office of Homeland Security have administrative access to the cellular networks. "The bad news is, you must provide true national cellular coverage. The good news is, we'll give you taxpayer money to do it, and make a profit. But we get to listen in on everybody's calls."

      This country has gotten along pretty well without true national cell coverage so far, and it can probably manage to muddle along a few more years until the market is mature enough to make such a thing plausible without government interference.

      Argh. I'm rambling on in an increasingly belligerent fashion. My point is made, so I'll stop now, before I become completely insufferable :)

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    3. Re:limited coverage by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      So the government would have to pay for it--which means we'd have to pay for it. My taxes would end up paying for a cell deep in the Ozarks that nobody wants or needs or cares about.

      Why do you think that nobody needs it? There's people living in up in them there hills. We as a society decided that every American would have water, and electricity and phone service - it probably still wouldn't be feasible to run those to some places. What's the problem with everyone in America being able to communicate from anywhere in America? Just the comfort of knowing you can communicate without worry anywhere is one great advantage.

      No longer getting mocked by Finns who can get cell coverage anywhere in Finland is another, of course.

    4. Re:limited coverage by hitzroth · · Score: 2

      Hey, do you remember reading about how rural areas in the US finally got electricity?

      Well, the big power companies said it wasn't profitable enough to run lines to rural areas. They said that the farmers and people in the rural communites wouldn't be able to afford to pay their bills, etc.

      Some people worked up the numbers and said it was, infact, not only profitable but socially and economically beneficial for rural areas to have electricity (electric appliances and equipment would lighten the work load of the people and allow one person work more land). But still the electricity companies refused, they said the risk was too great and the inital cost too high.

      So the government set up a trial area, electrified a corner of the rural US. It worked, the business was profitable, and the big energy companies wanted in on the deal.

      Now, the above is a gross oversimplification of what happened, and cell phones aren't electricity. And adding coverage is just bolstering a communications infrastructure that already exists. But, I'd suspect that cell coverage would end up being profitable if enstated -- if you give people a choice of two services, and one is cheaper and more effective, they take that one. If the enstatment of that service takes a government mandate, well, that's part of what the government is there for: to help keep businesses honest, and moving. Better than "legistlating profits", I'd say.

      As for the taxes, wouldn't you be willing to pay a little extra now to help ensure you pay a lot less later?

      As for the privacy issue... I don't have an answer except to say that if we can make records of all the calls, why not allow public access to those records. Including, perhaps especially, those of government personell?

      --
      In mathematics, one does not understand things, one merely gets used to them.
      --VonNeumann
    5. Re:limited coverage by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      Fair enough. I got a little carried away, there.

      Your counter argument is strong, and supported by facts, so I'll happily concede my purely speculative point.

      Also, I'm all in favor of less government privacy. Wasn't it David Brin who proposed last year that government snooping on private citizens was fine, so long as the citizens had equal snooping powers over the government? Or was it Bruce Sterling? Anyway, whoever said it, I like it, and should probably start voting for it.

      Thanks for clarifying the cell phone issue for me. I'll go away and contemplate things in greater detail, now :)

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    6. Re:limited coverage by susano_otter · · Score: 2
      Why do you think that nobody needs it?

      I admit I simply assumed nobody needed it. I also didn't mean the Ozarks literally, so much as symbolically; a figurative example of the kind of place I assumed wouldn't want or need cell coverage.

      I guess my response was driven largely by my belief that--unlike water, electricity, and standard phone service--cell phones are a luxury, not a necessity. I could be wrong in my beliefs, though.

      More reply here.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    7. Re:limited coverage by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      Tsk-tsk, have you forgotton our administration's pledge to "Leave no redneck behind?" (kidding) (sort of)

      From an economic standpoint, gov't intervention makes a lot of sense for market failure (private market fails to exploit opportunity), projects with high entry costs but long-term profits (airports, cell phone expansion?), and social projects that loses money but yield other benefits (universal mail delivery, public transit, gee-whiz pointless boodoogle manned space exploration :).

      Then there's Keynes to argue about...

      I'm sure someone has stated it in a more poetic way. But I do think gov't has a role, and that it should step out at the earliest opportunity.

  43. This is what _really_ drives mass adoption... by foonf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't really use the telephone a whole lot. I've never seen a need for a mobile phone, and part of the argument against one went kind of like this: Well, if I'm stuck somewhere and I really need to get in touch with someone, I can always use a pay phone. And if its not important enough to spend 35 cents I really don't need to make the call anyway. I guess not eh? At some point in the future I might have to spend $(minimum cell phone cost) every month just to get the same service I would have formerly gotten from the once-ubiquitous (and free if I don't actually have to use them) public pay phones.

    The same thing happened to rail transit in most American cities about 40-50 years ago as road systems improved and more people bought automobiles.

    --

    "(Man) tries to live his own life as if he were telling a story. But you have to choose: live or tell." --Sartre
    1. Re:This is what _really_ drives mass adoption... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      I used to think this, but whenever I take a trip, especially on motorcycle, I carry a cell. I recently got one for full time usage.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    2. Re:This is what _really_ drives mass adoption... by pyrros · · Score: 2, Informative

      I really have no idea about what charge plans are available in the USA, but here in europe you can get a GSM phone on a "pay as you go" or prepaid plan, where you don't pay a flat monthly fee, but instead buy scratch cards which give you airtime. So, you could buy a cheapass phone for less than $100 and then get a scratch card (sold practically everywhere) whenever you run out of airtime.

      There is one small catch: you have to buy a scratch card at least once a year, so you are not disconnected. However that's no big deal, as the cheapest scratch cards cost $5-7. So you are just forced to use a minimum of $5-7 a year. Most people i know use way more than that per month, so it's only an issue if you get a cellphone only for incomming calls (which are free in europe) or emergencies.

      (Prices in $ because slashdot would eat &euro; in both POT and HTML)

    3. Re:This is what _really_ drives mass adoption... by jez9999 · · Score: 2

      because slashdot would eat &euro

      WTF are you using &euro for? There's a Euro key '' on my keyboard (ctrl-alt-4), and even if not, it's in most font sets now so just use character map!

    4. Re:This is what _really_ drives mass adoption... by pyrros · · Score: 1

      Because it doesn't look the same in all character codings, and since slashdot doesn't bother to send a codepage, it will look mangled in people who's default codepage is not western(latin 1) or a m$ one (try your post on iso-8859-7 (greek) or iso-8859-15 (latin-9)).

      Also, see here for more fun with the euro sign.

    5. Re:This is what _really_ drives mass adoption... by schwanerhill · · Score: 2

      Prepaid phones haven't caught on here in the States like in Europe, largely because, when I last looked in May, prepaid plans couldn't be bought here for less than about US$30, and that expires after 3 months rather than a year. Pay as you go in the U.K., expensive as it is, is much cheaper than in the States. Also, whereas every little shop (at least in London) has top-up cards available, they are hard to come by in the U.S.

      However, 30 seconds of shopping around makes it seem like prepaid plans are much more reasonable now than they used to be. A $10 Cingular prepaid card gets you $0.50/min, and a $30 one gets $0.30/min, which isn't horrible.

      Also, what the provdiers don't tell you is that any mobile phone in the U.S., even a deactivated one, can make a free 911 call, as long as there's a compatible cell tower in range.

      (This is why a bit of well-placed regulation would be a good thing--American regulators have let the market determine the pricing schemes, and that means that it is impossible to get a halfway decent plan, even for occasional use, without paying $30/month and a 1-year contract, making it very difficult to change providers if you see a cheaper plan or a decent pay-as-you-go rate.)

  44. So what about emergency calls and the poor? by John+Murray · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is bad news for all the people who can't justify paying $30+/month for a cell phone. With ubiquitous pay phones in case of emergency, knowing you could find a near by pay phone. From this article, it could soon become very hard to find a pay-phone when one is needed. This will be big problem for the lower middle class, who can't justify paying for a cell phone, but live areas, where cell toting yuppies, have caused most of the pat phones to be removed. The poor may be less effected, as, according to the article, phones in poorer areas are still profitable.

    1. Re:So what about emergency calls and the poor? by geek · · Score: 2

      Considering that 911 is a toll free call I doubt any phone companies will become altruists and put up phones that say "Homeless only" on them.

      They can still shout for help and run to nearby businesses. I doubt the impact will be large but who knows.

    2. Re:So what about emergency calls and the poor? by hitzroth · · Score: 2

      Around the local college campus we have "blue light phones".

      They're not really "phones": no reciever, button pad, etc. They're intercoms on posts topped with blue lights (hence the name). Push a button and campus police dispatch picks up. Sure, there's a potential for abuse, but it doesn't seem to happen enough to outweigh the potential benefits.

      Not too many payphones on campus these days, though. I suspect that they won't die out entirely, but rather simply become much rarer.

      How this would to apply to areas with substantial crime and vandalism rates, I don't know.

      --
      In mathematics, one does not understand things, one merely gets used to them.
      --VonNeumann
    3. Re:So what about emergency calls and the poor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can still shout for help and run to nearby businesses.

      which, of course, would work out really well for the two thirds of the day that those businesses aren't open

      If you've ever been in a part of a city dominated by offices in the middle of the night (or even on a Saturday), the empty streets can be quite freaky, and the presence of payphones can be quite reassuring.

    4. Re:So what about emergency calls and the poor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cell phones can dial 911 even when they aren't connected to a service - you can donate used ones to charities which hand them out to poor people for emergency use.

  45. Re:LAMEST post of 2002 by n0nsensical · · Score: 1

    are slashdot running out of questions?

    You must be new here.

  46. "School" payphone case mods by SHEENmaster · · Score: 2

    aren't the best way to win the support of the administration.

    It isn't hard to replace the handset with one that has a sereo jack for a pda/ipod red box. I know, I know, I know: it isn't really a red box unless you solder it from scratch, but still a cool idea.

    Disclaimer: This is neither a confession nor a suggestion. I am not admitting to any wrongdoing, accompliship in wrongdoing or premeditation of wrongoing.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
    1. Re:"School" payphone case mods by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, it really is a genuine "Red Box". The REAL coin-tone generator circuit board in a real Ma Bell payphone is in fact in a red plastic box. That's where the term "Red Box" came from.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    2. Re:"School" payphone case mods by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      wait they still use those?!

      hmmm.. maybe i should try this phreaking thing i've read all bout...

      (the above was only a joke, i have never phreaked, and i probably never will... phreaking is so.... 1970's)

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    3. Re:"School" payphone case mods by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      i thought that's what the h4ck0rz use in the 90's to obtain cc numbs off aol customers? i knew the 70's were freaky and far-out, didn't know they had gotten phreakey yet... learn something new every day.

    4. Re:"School" payphone case mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh. The 70's were when phreaking was born... Read : Capt'n Crunch. Much harder to phreak payphones here in Oz, they dont use tones to tell the operator how much money has been placed, rather the phone handles all that itself, therby removing the ability to "Red Box" it. Read : Siemens Elasa Payphone.

    5. Re:"School" payphone case mods by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      Much harder to phreak payphones here in Oz, they dont use tones to tell the operator how much money has been placed, rather the phone handles all that itself, therby removing the ability to "Red Box" it.

      the way it should always have been

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
  47. More important than environmental hazard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens when people have an accident and want to call emergency services ? Most people have a cellphone but shouldn't there be some sort of police phone boxes for people who don't have one ? Will emergency services be restricted to white upper class families ?
    Well that may be, people voted for a stupid redneck called W.Bush, so that's what they deserve anyway. Isn't it ?

  48. Only Terrorists Use Public Telephones by jpt.d · · Score: 5, Funny


    How can the government ensure your security if you use public pay phones?

    Use your cell phone, or get one! That way your phone records are just a computer away from the people protecting your safety.

    Do not assist the Terrorists!

    --
    What we see depends on mainly what we look for. -- John Lubbock Now search for that bug slave!
  49. Pay phones were never profitable by Gus · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Most pay phones lost money like a sieve. The decline of the enclosed phone booth came about due to the high incidence of they being used as toilets; the local Bell technicians wanted nothing to do with repairing a smashed phone in a small enclosure reeking of urine.

    In general, pay phones were mandated by public safety regulations, not profit motive. Problems ranging from smashed handsets to stolen phone books to smashed window glass plagued public phones constantly.

    If pay phones were profitable, why did the Baby Bells allow anyone to start running them? It would have been a very strange business decision given their history of profiteering in the post Ma Bell era.

    --
    --Gus
    1. Re:Pay phones were never profitable by duffbeer703 · · Score: 2

      Maybe you don't recall, but the government deregulated telecommunications in the early 90's. 50,000 ripoff payphone providers were one of the many negative results.

      Also remember that until the 90's, many rural areas still hadn't upgraded to private line service, so payphones were a way to communicate without the neighbors listening in.

      Payphones were very profitable until the government decided to block incoming calls. In many poorer neighborhoods, people used the local payphone for day-to-day calling instead of paying $25/month for landline service.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    2. Re:Pay phones were never profitable by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      The decline of the enclosed phone booth came about due to the high incidence of they being used as toilets

      Why are we not willing to provide bathrooms for the indigent? They gotta go sometime. In some countries they have coin-op freestanding bathrooms, and provide the homeless with free tokens. There is a problem with prostitutes using the bathrooms for business transactions ... on etrick is to have the doors open after a certain time interval. I'm sure lots of people here have more experience with these contraptions that I do, but the contribution to sanitation seems obvious.

      In answer to your Q, pay phones were not particularly profitable -- maybe airports were exceptions -- and were maintained either because the property owners subsidized them (every restaurant and gas station is supposed to have a pay phone after all, though no longer) or regulatory pressure was applied to provide phones at reasonable rates for the poor. In Boston they retained a 10 basic rate until astonishingly recently.

    3. Re:Pay phones were never profitable by /dev/trash · · Score: 2

      Weird. then how come the Pay Phone just down the road from me gets calls all the time?

    4. Re:Pay phones were never profitable by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2
      how come the Pay Phone just down the road from me gets calls all the time?

      that's me, man. I've been waiting at the airport for days. Why haven't you picked me up?

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    5. Re:Pay phones were never profitable by repetty · · Score: 1

      Payphones were very profitable until the government decided to block incoming calls.

      Who told you that?

      My father worked for SWBell during the 60's and 70's. Back in the 70's he told me that every pay telephone was a losing proposition -- they never made money, even back then.

      --Richard

    6. Re:Pay phones were never profitable by Gus · · Score: 2
      Exactly. I got my information from my boss and co-workers, most of whom spent time with the Great Telephone Expiriment in the seventies and eighties. They all dreaded calls to repair pay phones, and knew the score then.

      --
      --Gus
    7. Re:Pay phones were never profitable by Gus · · Score: 2
      How do incoming calls make a pay phone profitable? An incoming call for which the pay phone user pays nothing doesn't really seem like much of a cash cow.

      --
      --Gus
    8. Re:Pay phones were never profitable by duffbeer703 · · Score: 2

      At one time payphones were the only phones available for a very large number of people, which made them far more valuable.

      Even if a person took an incoming call -- without the payphone, that person would have communicated with their relative or friend via mail and the call never would have been made.

      Keep in mind that even 30 years ago, phone service was not a universal thing. In the rural New York town where my parents lived, only about 50% of the town outside of the main village had private lines. This is in an area about 2 1/2 hours north of NYC.

      If the phone company had to wire apartment buildings, tenaments, and rural areas with 60's and 70's technology, phone service would have been way to cost-prohibitive for anyone to purchase it.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    9. Re:Pay phones were never profitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you even realize that you are a troll?

  50. Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Reasons why payphones are better than cellphones:

    • Payphones don't ring in movie theaters
    • People don't drift into your lane and cut you off because they're yakking into a payphone
    • Brain cancer isn't even a remote possibility with payphones
    • Sometimes you find a dime in a payphone's change slot
    • With a payphone you can call people collect for free
    • Payphones aren't obsoleted in a year just because they can't take stupid pictures or haven't shrunk in size by a factor of 3
    • Payphones are the safest option if you're up to no good
    • Receiving calls at payphones is convenient (or used to be before the drug dealers screwed it up for everybody)
    • No long term commitment or credit check with a payphone
    • Payphones don't ever have to come with you on vacations
    • When the payphone doesn't work, you go to another payphone instead of navigating an automated touch tone maze
    • No static with a payphone


    I could go on and on... it will be sad to see the payphone go. I swear I could strangle the jackass who actually took a call in the theater during the Two Towers last week.

    1. Re:Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by Steve+B · · Score: 2
      Reasons why payphones are better than cellphones:

      You forgot "You can't untraceably dial a spammer's 800 number from a cell phone."

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    2. Re:Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2

      You forgot "You can't untraceably dial a spammer's 800 number from a cell phone."

      A spammer who emails an 800 number shouldn't be in the business. :)

    3. Re:Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Funny
      I swear I could strangle the jackass who actually took a call in the theater during the Two Towers last week.

      Why didn't you? Seriously, you paid 8 or 9 bucks to enjoy the movie and you shouldn't put up with some inconsiderate fucktard yacking on his cell phone. Demand, loudly and belligerently, that they hang up (feel free to use the word "fucktard." I like it.) and if that doesn't work, pick a fight with 'em. At the very least you'll get your money's worth of enjoyment out of beating them severely (Or being beaten severely, don't back down even if they're bigger than you. Once you go down that road there's no turning back.)

      Most people don't want to get in a fight so I doubt it'd ever come to blows anyway, and the audience will think you're a hero no matter the outcome. It's up to us all to stamp out the scourge of cell phones users in the movie theater.

      And yes, I walk that walk, though since I pay my tribute to the MPAA as rarely as possible I've only ever had to demand that someone turn their phone off once (It was G or PG so I said "jackass" and not "fucktard" -- see, I'm considerate!) and didn't even have to threaten physical violence. He hung up, politely watched the movie and cleared out of the theater almost before the credits hit the screen. I hope the experience was traumatic enough for him that he will be more polite in the future.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    4. Re:Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2
      Why didn't you? Seriously, you paid 8 or 9 bucks to enjoy the movie and you shouldn't put up with some inconsiderate fucktard yacking on his cell phone.

      I couldn't really hear his conversation- I just saw him talking on it. The annoying thing was the stupid ring tone it made. And that makes me realize another great thing about payphones that I forgot:

      • When payphones do ring, they just ring- they don't make a mockery of the greatest music ever produced by Western civilization.


      Anyway, I think picking a fight during Gollum's "schizophrenia" scene would have made me some enemies in the theater. This happened the day of the opening in the middle of Silicon Valley, so you can imagine how completely packed the theater was.

    5. Re:Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by charstar · · Score: 1

      Thank you for conributing to the English language! FUCKTARD! I like it!

      next time somebody cuts me off...

      Fucktard! .|..

      YEAH!

    6. Re:Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by chromatic · · Score: 1
      People don't drift into your lane and cut you off because they're yakking into a payphone

      Yeah, but if they could talk on a payphone while driving, they'd probably drift. :)

    7. Re:Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by gilroy · · Score: 2
      Blockquoth the posters:



      You forgot "You can't untraceably dial a spammer's 800 number from a cell phone."


      A spammer who emails an 800 number shouldn't be in the business. :)


      Enough people join this trend, and the spammer soon won't be. :)
    8. Re:Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Most people don't want to get in a fight so I doubt it'd ever come to blows anyway...

      Except if they're gang members... don't try this at an Ice Cube film, just let the guy attend to his business.

    9. Re:Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Reasons why payphones are better than cell phones

      - Receiving calls at payphones is convenient


      I'm sorry, most of your list I could tolerate, but I do believe it's more convenient to answer my cell phone in my pocket than it is to walk down to a payphone.

      An alternative rebuttal might be:

      Is that a payphone in your pocket, or are you just happy to hear from me?

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    10. Re:Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by silentbozo · · Score: 3, Funny

      I would have yelled "Kill the guy with the cellphone!" and let the people immediately surrounding him take care of the problem. Of course, this would have been during the midnight showing, so the fan base there would have been easier to incite to kill a cellphone wielding idiot.

    11. Re:Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, most of your list I could tolerate, but I do believe it's more convenient to answer my cell phone in my pocket than it is to walk down to a payphone.

      Actually people in my family used to do this a lot in the B.C. years (before cellphones) at places like malls and airports. It was a useful trick in a pinch. Until my grandmother (who has no cellphone) managed to get herself stranded at an airport for several hours because she didn't realize that payphones no longer take incoming calls.

    12. Re:Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by demi · · Score: 1

      Wasn't there some noise about theaters jamming cellphone bands to prevent exactly this thing? (A similar thing happened when I saw Towers, I think--I didn't see the phone but I heard the mumbled conversation).

      I've found that merely asking someone to stop what they're doing, in a normal tone of voice, usually works and it generally pays to be polite, at least to start with.

      --
      demi
    13. Re:Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by jsse · · Score: 1

      You don't need to resort to excessive violance. Don't you wonder why that lousy theather soda cost you three time as much? You guess it, you're granted the right to pour it on these bastards!

      Showing on the screen:

      Turn off your cell phone now, or you'd be automatically revoked the right to reject anybody from pouring soda on your head when you try to use it.

      Note: Only soda purchased from authorized shop in theather can be used in this situation.

    14. Re:Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      don't forget that you can't enjoy anonymous internet access over a cellphone either!! the payphones with phonejacks for laptops are amazing, the hard part is finding an anonymous ISP anymore... it was so easy when there were all those free ones...

      Reece,

    15. Re:Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by Mike1024 · · Score: 2

      Hey,

      Reasons mobile phones are better than pay phones:

      If you're in a city you don't know, your phone is still right in your pocket; you can find it instantly, and without a long walk etc.

      Costs take care of themselves (in the UK, we can pre-pay for our calls, and with no monthly fees), so you don't have to piss around with a pocket full of change.

      If you're up to no good, you can use an unregistered* prepaid mobile phone from the comfort of your own home.

      Recieving calls on a mobile phone is easy. Particularly because where ever you are, you still have the same number.

      Pre-paid phones are availiable with no long-term commitments, or credit checks.

      You can call emergency services without leaving the site of an accident, and the dispatcher can ask you questions which you can check and stuff.

      You won't get to your mobile phone and find it's been vandalised.

      If you have a problem with your mobile, you can borrow someone else's... they're usually pretty good about it.

      Mobile phones can be digital, meaning they don't suffer from static.

      You can get mobile phone calls while you are using your wired phone line (Useful if broadband is unavailiable where you live, as is the case with me).

      If you're meeting someone, or picking them up, you can call them when you arrive, from the comfort of you car.

      You can send 'text messages' - short phone-to-phone messages - so you don't have to make a full call.

      I could go on and on... I quite like my mobile phone.

      Michael

      *you can buy the phone in a shop, and get it activated without giving an address

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
  51. Wonderful. by DwarfGoanna · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't stand cell phones, I don't need or want one, and I don't plan on getting one now. Maybe I have become truly die hard cynical, but this smacks of another case where I am being herded into buying something I don't need, because the public (read free or optional) alternative was taken away from me. I am so moving to Canada or Australia.

    --

    "You know why you do not see me styling wit my homies? Because I have no homies!!" -Mojo Jojo

    1. Re:Wonderful. by recursiv · · Score: 2

      You're not being herded anywhere. If you don't need a cellphone, as you say, you're all set. Having payphones available is not a right. It came into being because it made economical sense. There were enough people willing to pay for calls to make payphones feasible. They're not written into the constitution. They were just a convenience. Now there aren't enough people willing to pay for them. Why should they want to? Cell phones are more convenient, cheaper over the long run, and ladies tell me the vibrate feature really comes in handy. (I just made the last one up... ladies don't talk to me)

      Anyway, quit your whining.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    2. Re:Wonderful. by tada_mac · · Score: 1

      why do you think it is any different there?

    3. Re:Wonderful. by op00to · · Score: 2
      Cell phones are more convenient, cheaper over the long run


      How is a Cell phone cheaper? Your standard cell phone costs perhaps $200. Then, the cheapest service is $30/month. Yes, there's pay as you go, but that's pushing 50 cents a minute in the US. If you're just recieving a call at a payphone, it costs $0.00. If you're dialing, most pay phones are 50 cents unlimited. Let's say you really need to make on the average two calls a day. Over a year, the cell phone costs $560. 365 calls with the pay phone, only $182.50. How are they cheaper over the long run? 2 years? $920 vs $365. 10 years? $5600 vs $1825. Hey, even if you take out the cost of the cell hpone, it's still not cheaper. And what's so convienent about either having to go to a store to fill up your pre-paid cell phone, or having to sign some awful contract before you even know the cell phone will work for you?
    4. Re:Wonderful. by op00to · · Score: 1

      Oops, instead of "Two calls a day", i mean "One call a day". Sorry.

    5. Re:Wonderful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Let me introduce you to my favorite phrase: Horse Shit.

      Which, coincidentally enough, is exactly what your post is. See, pay phones never have made money. Yes, hang out with old telecomm guys, you learn shit.

      And, if you happen to be low income/credit underpriviledged, good luck on the cell phone thing. Of course you can pay the hefty deposits to get cell phone coverage, iff you have credit card, but other than that well, pay by minute cell phone sucks. A lot.

      Nothing like taking something that was a public utility, destroying it, making everyone pay, and then making those with the least ability to pay pay much more for the priviledge of being just like everyone else.

      Oh, and before you give me the whole "You should pay your bills/be a good citizen" screed, spend a year or so out of work. If only all you schmucks that never had a hard row to hoe could experience the gift of poverty once before mommy and daddy paid for things.

    6. Re:Wonderful. by palo0019 · · Score: 2

      First of all, it's not practical and frequently not possible to receive phone calls at a payphone. What do you do, arrange the call beforehand? And how do you do that, by calling them on the payphone?

      If it's 50c per call for a payphone, how do you figure it's $182 a year? You said 2 calls a day, you're not actually assuming one of those calls are received are you? Also, all the payphones around here are limited to 3 minutes.

      Almost all of your numbers are totally made-up. Unless you're getting some snooty picture phone shit your phone will be highly discounted with your service. I paid $60 with my pre-pay cellphone.

      So, let's assume 3 minutes a day. $365 a year with a payphone. I'm most familliar with my pre-pay, so lets do that. That's .25 per minute for the first 10 minutes of a day, .10 after (which is irrelevant in this case). I also get a $10 credit if I use more than $50 a month. At 6 minutes it'll be about $45 a month, but we'll assume I make sure I reach $50 for more important calls, which will reduce it to $40. So that's roughly $480 a year.

      Is the extra $115 worth it for not having to wander the streets for a phone? I think so. It also costs .10 to send a text message, and it's free to receive. Using that alone I could drastically cut my cost between others with cellphones. And keep in mind that pre-pay isn't usually as good for frequent users (which I'm not), a service plan could save you more money.

      And yeah I realize my numbers are just as bullshit as yours are.

  52. Re:Don't trash; upgrade! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're looking to pay for it... I mean they are getting rid of the current pay phones because they aren't making them money.

    Now think up a business plan for the WiFi hotspots to "4. Profit"

  53. Slashdotted and mods... by Xipe66 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe it's time for a new topic for mods to vote on "How appropriate, in the slashdot tradition, do you think this article/news item is?" Meaningless and/or uninteressting stuff are more and more frequent on the slashdot frontpage (or maybe I should change my profile to display less entries?).

    --
    Civilization is the process of setting man free from men.
  54. land: own or right? by jazperbg · · Score: 1

    Do the telcos own the land the payphones are on, or do they have some sort of special right/agreement on it? If they owned the land they could make some money from selling the land the payphones are on (possible buyer: advertisers), and use that money to dispose of the payphones in a safe manner. I'm probably completely wrong here, as no-one is likely to want a two-foot square piece of land, even if it is in a prime location.

    --
    jasp
    1. Re:land: own or right? by geek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In high school i worked at a Mail Boxes etc on a street corner in downtown Fremont CA. My boss used to complain about the pay phone in front of the store because the kids coming home from school hung around next to it for hours everyday to the disturbance of everyone around. We talked about it once and the gist of it was that the phone companies come to small businesses like liquor stores and offer a set amount of cash over a period of time to lease the store front spot for the phone. You sign a binding contract, usually 10 years, sometimes more. You can not back out of the contract no matter how badly you want it gone.

      So no they dont own the land, it's leased. At least here in CA that seems to be the case.

  55. anti terror by Spellbinder · · Score: 0

    this is bushs new policy against terrorism ...
    he thinks they will have to steal cellphones to stay anonymous
    because of this he hopes nobody will argue if he starts executing any suspects

    --


    stop supporting microsoft with pirating their software!!!!!
  56. But, for Verizon they don't need to be profitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They may be unprofitable if you actually pay $30 a month for it. Verizon doesn't have to do anything, except stop by once in a blue moon to make sure the thing works. Especially if they make no money, why bother collecting nothing ...

  57. wtf?! by countzer0interrupt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Many pay phones, ... are now used so infrequently that they cost money to operate.


    You mean I've been putting my money into them for all this time for nothing?!

    Seriously though, perhaps if phone companies want to perpetuate the phone booth they should do more stuff like this.

    Sure, it can't be that good for profit, but it's bound to increase the popularity. But if you want to increase profit, there was a scheme a few years back where people listened to an advertisement at the start of a call to increase telco revenue. I've never seen (or heard) this done. Why not?
  58. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by TheTomcat · · Score: 2

    Hmm. I've never seen a payphone equipped automobile. Is that part of GM's On* offering?

  59. Telcos should install WiFi in its place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look to Bell Canada, they're installing WiFi hotspots with a DSL backend off of the copper pair.

    Great way to evolve the tech.

  60. They shouldn't have raised the cost to $.35 by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    I'm still a little bitter that I can't pop in a quarter and call when I need to.
    Honestly the only time I really ever used payphones was from high school to call mom to pick me up after sporting events.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  61. Sorry -- your living in the 80's by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 3, Informative

    1. Terrorists and other street criminals don't use public telephones -- mostly they don't work, it's inconvenient and there's no privacy.

    2. Criminals use stolen cell phones to make their calls and throw them away every couple of days.

    --
    I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
  62. Use the wiring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time to use all of that wiring. POPs? Internet access? Wireless POP?

    Let's not let it go to waste! How about monitoring stations? There must be a good geographic distribution to those payphones.

  63. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by Tailhook · · Score: 1

    This is not a consequence of removing payphones. This is a consequence of using mobile phones in cars.

    I can't believe some moron actually modded this up to 3...

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  64. Who needs them? by GlamdringLFO · · Score: 1

    What about people who don't want/can't afford/totally despise cellphones? I'm sure people carrying them on the street don't want to be bothered and certainly won't let people use them to make a call. But if there are no payphones around, will there be an alternative? I understand the monetary problem, but some people rely on pay phones regularly. So what will they be forced to do?

    --
    Skal! AMS
  65. What, no emergency phone for kids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a kid (1980's) we carried a quarter in our shoe or in the pocket of our Roo's in case we needed to make an "emergency" call home.

    Then they made it $0.35 in the 1990's, and now you had to educate your children to carry a quarter *and* a dime.

    Now, it's $0.50, they don't take half dollar pieces, so you have to have your child take two quarters (one in each shoe?) and then hope that wherever they get lost or need to call home, the pay phone hasn't been ripped out of the wall.

    As for calling the operator or 911: operators don't often know how to handle a child's pleading phone call, and 911 is for life threatening emergencies. I'd sure educate MY kid to call 911, but do we really want every kid to know it's okay to dial 911 even if it's not a real emergency?

    Hooray for progress. What are we to do, buy every three year old a cell phone?

  66. PayPhones are good by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Interesting
    If, like me, you don't have a cell phone, payphones are a good thing.

    Payphones have all but disappeared around London, since so few calls are made on them and almost everyone has a cell phone. This trend started years ago. When I was last in London cellphones even worked down in the Tube.

    One thing disappearing payphones would mean: One more parking place available at finer gas stations and 7-11's everywhere.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:PayPhones are good by stephanruby · · Score: 2
      If, like me, you don't have a cell phone, payphones are a good thing.

      Modernize. Get a cell phone. Even if you hardly use it, cell phone service in the UK is much cheaper and much more reliable than in the US and last I checked cell phones in the UK are much more reliable than those damn BT broken down pay phones.

    2. Re:PayPhones are good by F452 · · Score: 1

      How much is cell phone service in the UK? I pay $15 a month in the US. That's for only 60 minutes during the week and 250 on weekends, but I never come close to using up my minutes. (And if you're talking about it as a replacement for payphone dependence, that should be more than enough.)

      Can't speak for reliability differences. My service is reliable enough for me, but I don't have any basis for comparison.

    3. Re:PayPhones are good by Zulfiya · · Score: 2

      Payphones are a bit rarer now.

      I do have a cell phone and I've occasionally wound up letting other commuters use mine. The people who ask nicely usually offer a dollar or so to offset the cost of the call, and since I am standing right there are unlikely to be calling Zimbabwe or anything.

      I occasionally wonder if I am a pushover, or if anyone else ever actually says yes when a stranger asks to borrow their phone.

      --
      -- I'm not evil, I'm ... differently motivated!
    4. Re:PayPhones are good by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Currently I reside in the US. I'm probably going to pick up one of those pre-paid phones at the electronics barn. Since I'll have to buy time it should temper my enthusiasm to use it. I will check out the terms, as my sister has indicated the time expires in 3 months. I feel that is a complete swindle, however the state (CA) I live in may have something to say on the matter.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:PayPhones are good by walkern · · Score: 2, Informative

      Payphones in the UK are required to be operated by BT, the ex-government-owned telecomms monopoly. This is part of their legacy as a former nationalised entity. I remember reading something a while ago about how BT are stuck with the whole payphone business regardless of the cost. I for one have not noticed any fewer payphones in London, except perhaps for ones that AREN'T vandalised.

      As for cellphones working on the London Underground - they work on the underground lines that are actually above ground - but I can guarantee that they don't work in any of the tunnels! The number of times I have been bored waiting for a tube and wanted to text message someone is testament to this!

      One of the mobile networks - formerly One to One, and now part of the TMobile name - was looking into supplying a cellphone service on the underground. I'm not sure where that project went. This is a license to print money - there are millions of people every day on the underground and while they are down there they can't spend money on their phones. That said, if they start letting cellphones ring on the underground, I can't imagine the statistics for Tube passenger violence will get any better :/

    6. Re:PayPhones are good by John+Sullivan · · Score: 1
      Payphones in the UK are required to be operated by BT

      BT may well have to operate payphones (it seems unlikely that that wouldn't be an operating condition) but payphones don't have to be run by BT. About 7-8 years ago I think, there was a surge in non-BT phones going up around city centres. Most have disappeared now though (presumably because they have become much less profitable in that time.)

      --
      This is my World Wide Web of Whatever
  67. . subject . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I say give them to 2600 magazine as payback time!

  68. NO Service Plan Required for Cellular 911 Calls by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 2

    Most ANY cellular phone that's properly charged and within range of a compatible tower may be used to call 911...NO service plan of any kind is required...none!

    There are even various organizations that collect old cell phones and distribute them for emergency 911 use.

    In fact it's against the law for a carrier to knowingly block any 911 cellular call regardless of the tower(s) (assuming it's compatible with the phone being used) it's routed through nor the phone its dialed from.

    Bottom line is that absolutely NO service plan of any kind is necessary for 911 access and thus the "we need to save pay phones for 911 use" is a mute argument...now in regards to Clark Kent/Superman...not sure what he'll do now :;

    1. Re:NO Service Plan Required for Cellular 911 Calls by buss_error · · Score: 2
      "we need to save pay phones for 911 use" is a mute argument"

      Hate to nit pick, but this one really grates on my nerves. The word you want here is moot, not mute. Mute means unable to speek, moot means without significance. My wife does this and it drives me stright up the wall.

      --
      Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
    2. Re:NO Service Plan Required for Cellular 911 Calls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, slick: it's "speak", not "speek".

    3. Re:NO Service Plan Required for Cellular 911 Calls by ward · · Score: 1

      I have two cellphones in front of me, both are no longer under service plans. NEITHER will complete a 911 call nor a 0 call. I was stranded once and my main cellphone's battery was dead. I had the other two in my car (was going to donate them, guess I really should get around to that) and tried to use them. No go.

      So, even though there was plenty of signal, no emergency call capability was there. Sorry.

  69. mailboxes are disappearing too by phr1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    San Jose Mercury story: hundreds of mailboxes removed from San Francisco bay area, due to low usage, garbage thrown in mailboxes, fear of more anthrax attacks, etc. etc. I can't help worrying about all anonymous means of communication shutting down.

    1. Re:mailboxes are disappearing too by bmetzler · · Score: 2, Troll
      I can't help worrying about all anonymous means of communication shutting down.

      I can't wait until *all* anonymous means of communication is shut down. What is the usefulness of anonymous communication? I can't see any. Only a way for troublemakers to cause trouble.

      -Brent
    2. Re:mailboxes are disappearing too by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      What is the usefulness of anonymous communication? I can't see any. Only a way for troublemakers to cause trouble.

      I'm quite sure that Hitler or Stalin, or the American British circa the 1770's would have agreed with you; it would be so much easier to crack down on dissidents that way. I guess you'd like to do away with anonymous voting, too; if 'troublemakers' need to have their every word scrutinized, why should their votes escape scrutiny?

    3. Re:mailboxes are disappearing too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whistleblowers?

  70. Environmental hazards by lawpoop · · Score: 1
    "I wonder what kind of environmental hazard is posed by junking thousands of pay phones?"

    How about the environmental hazards of thousands of discarded cell phones?

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
  71. Re:Superman by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 2

    That's really what was missing from that show "Lois and Clark".
    Not ONCE In a phone booth!

    I mean they went at it on the ceiling, in outer space, on clouds above the city, but not ONCE In a phone booth!

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  72. Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One word. That is all.

  73. not to worry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Many municipalities require that telcos provide payphones within the region they serve as an understood cost of having control of the local area. NYC is a good example of this; Verizon is required to provide a certain number of payphones within a certain area, etc.

    Additionally, the cost is offset greatly by the advertising revenue generated by payphones. The REAL issue isn't the telcos killing off Payphones, but putting up booths with no phones IN them for months at a time. Verizon got nailed for doing this in an NYT articlea while back.

    Either the WP post is totally off base, or other municipalities andthe baby bells that serve them are friggin' morons.

    -rt

  74. It's bad when they remove the needed phones by ashitaka · · Score: 2

    Like this one.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  75. soooo sad... by the_real_tigga · · Score: 2

    Does anyone here remenber Antitrack?
    And probably even his misery resulting from old-scool (but nonetheless impressive) phone phreaking?

    as for me, I bow for you, antitrack.

    --
    my .sig is better than yours.
  76. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by Chicks_Hate_Me · · Score: 1

    I disagree, as long as you're paying attention to two things at the same time, you're still at a greater risk of an accident. Maybe it's just me, but I can't multi-task when I'm driving. Then again, I'm the only American that drives a stick.

  77. In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cell phones are being removed due to citizens using payphones!

  78. How about trashing cellphones? by MacAndrew · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder what kind of environmental hazard is posed by junking thousands of pay phones?

    How about junking hundreds of thousands or millions of cellphones. Plus the batteries each unit may go through in a lifetime. There's no way those things last as long as a nice clunky pay phone. I know we have a couple of dead ones around here somewhere, and a lot of people upgrade simply for fashion or features.

    Yes, people are looking into recycling the phones. It's difficult because the materials are so heterogeneous, and though a few like tantalum are quite valuable, the labor to break up the phones can outweigh that. A nicer idea -- hand-me-downs to less wealthy developing countries, for sale or parts. Cellular phones have a disproportionate value in countries that never got the telephone line infrastructure in the first place.

  79. But then how do I jack out of the Matrix? by Tri0de · · Score: 2

    Can't get out of the Matrix with a cell phone, it has to be a land line or Tank can't get me out of here!

    --
    "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts."
  80. spammers? by pmsyyz · · Score: 1

    It now installs satellite dishes, sets up e-mail kiosks and sells e-mail marketing to restaurants to make up for lost revenue.

    What? Are they spammers now?

    --
    Phillip
  81. where do you live? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I mean, when was the last time you saw a working pay phone?

    I make an average of 1-3 calls a week on payphones (and have for the past couple of years). My entire life I have never come across a payphone that didn't work.

    1. Re:where do you live? by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      I make an average of 1-3 calls a week on payphones (and have for the past couple of years).

      What, are you a drug dealer or something?

  82. I Wonder Why Pay Phones Don't Make Any Money. by Effugas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pay phones would make more money if they, like, accepted lots of it, in large denominations, when being begged to.

    Oh, do I have a rant for y'all.

    ===

    Gather 'round the pixels, folks, and let a still green traveller relate a story from the olden days...

    End of September, actually. Toorcon -- I flew out to San Diego to join Hikari's bad ass hackfest. Was so excited that I'd actually gotten my degree three days previous (not -- but that's another story entirely) that I didn't even think to check *where* in San Diego I was going.

    Lesson #1: For f*ck's sake, know where you're going after the airport.

    Figured I'd just check the net when I got there. *laughs*

    Lesson #2: For f*ck's sake, KNOW you'll never get a net connection when you really, really need one. (Reference: "The Inverse Square Law vs. The Presence of Microsoft Powerpoint: May The Enemy Never Discover The Network Cloaking Power of Talking To People When Powerpoint Is On")

    So. Rumor has it San Diego's Airport got a new water fountain once...it's talked about in hushed whispers, the emergency budget excess of 1983 brought a quenched thirst upon every traveler since. According to legend, other plumbing amenities relating to the invention of running water shall someday visit themselves upon this fine structure.

    No friendly arrows, no Internet Cafe's -- and though the Starbucks served coffee, it came in Disass only. There wasn't even a poorly secured baggage handling network waiting to provide me with my next stop (not that I'd ever poke around an airport network; for God sakes lad, they have guns! And Latex Gloves! I plead Joey's Soverignty!)

    So what could I do? Went to call my apartment.

    On a Pay Phone.

    Lesson #3: For f*ck's sake, buy a cell phone. Seven Eleven has them. They're FREE(after many rebates you'll never recieve). There's a REASON they're so profitable -- because PAY PHONES NOW SUCK.

    Proof:

    You want proof? My previous ranting is insufficient to show that I indeed know large scale suckitude when I recognize it in my cold, not quite dead flesh?

    Got some overpriced food. Requested change in quarters -- I was off to the telephone to get fully ripped off, but there's a LOT of hotels in SD and I didn't much prefer to check each one.

    "Bzzzzzz. I'm sorry, this phone doesn't accept coins for long distance calls."

    Lesson #4: Remember how you heard that pay phones weren't making money? They mispelled "taking".

    After bitching and moaning, I remembered I could charge my card to my credit card. Yes! Maybe my legal tender, unconstitutional to refuse (but we'll ignore that) couldn't get me moving, but surely the mighty power of Visa -- it's everywhere I want to be, and I want to be in a nice bed, and in that bed...er, anyway.

    "Thank you for calling 1-800-CALL-ATT. For a credit card call, press this number or we'll sic Carrot Top on you."

    "Thank you for selecting a credit card call. If you have a Mastercard, press 1. If you have an American Express, press 2. If you have a Discover Card, press 3. If you have a Visa, get a very strange look on your face."

    "Thank you for getting a very strange look on your face. An operator will be with you shortly to further refuse payment for services."

    You have to understand. I just graduated, I've got a LONG trip ahead of me -- this is right before the Singapore trip -- of all the problems I imagined possible, not having enough to pay for a single phone call was rather disconcerting.

    I briefly considered my options for having myself placed under arrest. I hear those guys get a phone call. But then I realized their call is on a pay phone too. Oops.

    Ended up calling my mother's company on their 800 number, tail between my legs, begging for info off a single web page. You'd THINK it ends here...

    'cept the person I reach, despite the net connection on her desk, doesn't particularly know what to do with it. So she calls her husband. To access the net. For me.

    Ever browsed the web through a listener that doesn't know what she's hearing but has to translate it into something she's saying? You Will, and the company that will bring it to you...

    Anyway, no reason to rant further -- it was one heck of a trip, an absolute blast -- but indeed, no matter what country I ended up in, the pay phones were as spastic as an epiliptic monkey with a broken pacemaker.

    I did like the 90 second pay phones, that took 75 seconds to establish a call. talkfastdoesn'tevenbegintocoverit

    Needless to say, I am now vastly more knowledgable about that which is GSM.

    --Dan

    1. Re:I Wonder Why Pay Phones Don't Make Any Money. by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 2

      Yet another fine example of why the world so desperatly needs a website like GodFuckingDamnit.com.

    2. Re:I Wonder Why Pay Phones Don't Make Any Money. by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2

      Lesson #1: For f*ck's sake, know where you're going after the airport.
      Figured I'd just check the net when I got there. *laughs*


      Lessons learned:
      Buy a friggin' map.

  83. Sometimes, they can't be removed. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2

    Recently, the authorities forced Bell Canada to keep one lone payphone located in an isolated village, so to insure that someone stranded there could call for help. Doubtlessly, one will see this scenario repeat itself more and more.

  84. MOD PARENT UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoooooo! Now THAT was a great laugh.

    You, sir are a magnificent bastard! If you're not making money as a writer, try to. Your bitter tirade had me howling, and at the same time managed to perfectly express what you were feeling as you actually lived through this.

    Beautiful, just beautiful!

  85. A friend... by MeatMan · · Score: 0

    ...of mine owns his own "Communications" company. He installs, maintains, and manages payphones. He used to make a fortune on his phones and was so busy, I'd help him throw payphones up on the weekends in some of the highest class and some of the most ghetto neighborhoods all over the county (needless to say, he paid me well). He had a great life when he wasn't working and he probably would have been a millionaire within probably about 10 years.
    I say probably because he was making so much money 5 years ago he was on track to NET his first million within the next 5 years. He made huge money on long distance customers and calling cards, but being it's in San Diego, he made bank on international calls to Mexico. Unfortunately, cellular phones have reduced him to making his first million... never. He still makes good money but he has had to remove probably 100 of his 500+ payphones he had up and more will come down. It's sort of like monopoly. He bought and/or leased as many viable locations as he could, put up his phones, upgraded them, now he has to sell them off. He has no trouble selling his removed payphones to various people and businesses in the U.S. and abroad, so far, but cellular phones are now the bane of his existence.
    If it keeps up and keeps spreading, as we all know it will, he won't be self-employed much longer... at least not in the payphone business.

  86. So much BS, so little time. by Crag · · Score: 5, Insightful
    • People were irritating in theaters before they had cell phones. There have been people talking, having big hats, having big hair, being fat, having crying children, having body odor and everything else ever since we've gathered in groups to enjoy things together.
    • People have been bad drivers since long before cell phones existed. Don't blame the phone for the driver's irresponsibility. People shave, put on lipstick, argue with their children, get drunk, you name it. Cell phones are not the problem.
    • There is no conclusive link between cellphones and brain cancer. The wall-powered microwave ovens people use everywhere have far greater capacity to do real damage to people than the battery-powered 7-days-without-a-charge cell phones. We actually know what microwaves do to flesh. We do it to food and water all the time. There hasn't been a problem with microwave ovens, much less cellphones.
    • Sometimes one finds change in the couch. One rarely finds change in one's significant other. The comparison is meaningless.
    • Emergency calls on a cell phone are always free. If it's not an emergency, why are you calling collect? Are you just cheap? Or are you making an emergency out of something that could really wait?
    • Cell phones aren't actually obsolete in a year just because etc. Some people are sheep who will buy anything with a bigger number or cuter design. I've had my phone for two years, and I would have had my previous phone for five if I hadn't given it to a friend as a present. Computers are 'obsolete in a year' just as much as cell phones, but I bet you would rather have a two-year old computer than your very own payphone. Again the comparison is meaningless.
    • Yes, payphones ARE the safest option if you're up to no good. So what?
    • What's convienient about getting calls at payphones? Standing around waiting? The lack of privacy?
    • There are cell phones which can be had with no long-term commitment or credit check. They're not cheap, but they exist.
    • Cell phones don't have to come on vacations either. If you think they do, you need better friends. I like having a cell phone wherever I go for convienience, but it's a choice I make, not an obligation.
    • Yes, when the payphone doesn't work, you walk/bus/hitchike/taxi to the next one. YAY.
    • My cellphone has excellent reception. It's better than a lot of people's home land lines. If you've had bad experiences, it's probably because you or your friends are cheap, as mentioned above.

    I could go on and on too. I swear I could strangle the jackasses who confuse the tools people use with the stupid things they do with the tools. I could also strangle the jackasses who have cellphone envy and try to mask it as some kind of superiority.

    I work hard to make sure I have the resources to live the kind of life I want to live. I want the ability to stay in touch with people I go shopping with so we don't have to agree to meet at the food court. If my girlfriend is in a car accident again, I want her to be able to reach me as soon as possible. If there's an earthquake and I'm trapped in a building, I want to be able to call for help and tell them I'm alive but bleeding and running out of air. If I'm on an airplane and hostages take over with box cutters, I want to say goodbye to my girlfriend before the plane runs into a building.

    I'm tired of anti-cellphone BS. There are no legitimate complaints against the phones themselves, and the complaints about the users have nothing to do with the phones.

    Grow up, people.

    1. Re:So much BS, so little time. by iiioxx · · Score: 5, Funny

      People were irritating in theaters before they had cell phones. There have been people talking, having big hats, having big hair, being fat, having crying children, having body odor and everything else ever since we've gathered in groups to enjoy things together.

      I agree. It's not that the cellphones themselves are bad, they are just one more tool for people who tend to be rude and inconsiderate (the same type of people who talk, wear big hats, and don't bathe). Blaming the technology for the way it is used is total bullshit.

      I often carry my cell phone in movies and restaurants, but I put the ringer on vibrate. If it rings, you have to be right next to me to even hear it buzz. I check the caller ID, and if it's someone I absolutely need to speak with I answer it, and quietly tell them to hold while I step out of the theatre. If not, I let it go to voicemail and check it after the show.

      Are there a lot of phones that don't have vibrate? Or just a lot of people who don't care about irritating the people around them? I think it's less an issue of invasive technology, and more an issue of a culture of self-obsession.

      Case in point:

      I was in a theatre this past weekend. Outside the auditorium there was a bigass sign that said "Cellphone Free Zone". During the trailers, there was an announcement to turn off your cellphone. But sure enough, halfway through the movie, a cellphone rang in the row behind me, and the woman not only answered it, but sat there and carried on a conversation. No doubt, the woman felt she was above any petty social convention, and she was too important for the "rules" to apply to her.

      At this point, I lost my patience and decided to teach her a lesson about social convention. I stood up, turned around, and announced loudly, "turn off your phone or I will whip out my dick and piss on you!" I think she thought I was kidding until I reached for my fly. Then she told the caller "gotta go" and just hung up. I said, "thank you for your cooperation," sat back down, and tried hard not to ruin the moment by laughing my ass off...

    2. Re:So much BS, so little time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If I'm on an airplane and hostages take over with box cutters, I want to say goodbye to my girlfriend before the plane runs into a building.


      Those pesky hostages, they just keep taking planes over with box cutters...

    3. Re:So much BS, so little time. by Patik · · Score: 2, Troll
      If I'm on an airplane and hostages take over with box cutters...
      In Soviet Russia, the hostages hold you!
    4. Re:So much BS, so little time. by Bartmoss · · Score: 2

      100% agree. Especially about the cinema thing - I have never in the past two years had anybody had their phone ring when I saw a movie. I have however had a bucnh of teenagers yell because they were brainless.

    5. Re:So much BS, so little time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just that the irritating people who do all these things (shaving while driving, talking in theatre, etc) before are the same people who are more likely to use cellphones.

    6. Re:So much BS, so little time. by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2

      There is no conclusive link between cellphones and brain cancer.

      Actually I never said there was. Maybe I didn't make that clear. All I said was that with payphones, it was obvious to everybody that this is not something to worry about at all. So we didn't even have to suffer any debate about it.

      Cell phones aren't actually obsolete in a year just because etc. Some people are sheep who will buy anything with a bigger number or cuter design.

      I've also had my phone for a long time (since 1999) and it still works fine. Although people with smaller phones make fun of it because it's as big as my fist. Most people I know personally go through one every year.

      Yes, payphones ARE the safest option if you're up to no good. So what?

      This is actually a variant of: "If you're not doing anything wrong then you have nothing to worry about". Were you asleep when they passed the PATRIOT Act? Do you know what a pen register is? Once payphones are gone, you can't make anonymous phone calls anymore. They're always traceable back to you. From a privacy perspective the disappearance of the payphone is a nontrivial issue.

      There are cell phones which can be had with no long-term commitment or credit check. They're not cheap, but they exist.

      Payphones still win in this regard. All you need is a couple quarters.

      Cell phones don't have to come on vacations either. If you think they do, you need better friends. I like having a cell phone wherever I go for convienience, but it's a choice I make, not an obligation.

      It isn't just friends. Many employers will implicitly assume that you're reachable 24/7 if they see you have a cellphone. A lot of people resent their cellphones because they don't like being imposed upon. Some people even take lack of cellphone coverage into account when passive-aggressively planning their vacations. This isn't a problem for me because I make it clear that mine is for emergencies and I don't give out the number. (In fact I tend to forget the number.)

      My cellphone has excellent reception. It's better than a lot of people's home land lines. If you've had bad experiences, it's probably because you or your friends are cheap, as mentioned above.

      Yes, I see- you've got it all figured out. Poor service is the customer's fault.

      I could go on and on too. I swear I could strangle the jackasses who confuse the tools people use with the stupid things they do with the tools. I could also strangle the jackasses who have cellphone envy and try to mask it as some kind of superiority.

      Man, what a killjoy you are! The post was facetious. People like to hate cellphones because so many varieties of bad habits tend to crystallize around them. As far as envy- I reserve that for people who have houses. Cellphones... nah, I don't envy cellphones.

      I'm tired of anti-cellphone BS. There are no legitimate complaints against the phones themselves, and the complaints about the users have nothing to do with the phones.

      Oh quit pretending the devices are perfect. Boneheaded users aside, there are legitimate complaints against the phones themselves. From the cell phone owner's own perspective there are drawbacks associated with cell phones: spotty coverage, poor service, and lack of anonymity. None of these are issues with payphones.

    7. Re:So much BS, so little time. by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

      >I could go on and on too. I swear I could strangle the jackasses who confuse the tools people use with the stupid things they do with the tools.

      The tool isn't completely safe from criticism just because a person is using it. If the tool lends itself to certain behavior then the manfucaturer is liable also - to a certain degree. Think Microsoft's security. Think easy to swallow kid's toys.

      Why don't cell phones have functions that would fix all these little social problems? It would be trivial to install a signal that theaters and other venues that don't want to deal with ringers could send to set ALL phones in the area to vibrate.

      Or detect the doppler shift so the person can set their phone to "don't ring when I'm driving."

      Report cell phone tower to parents who give their kids cell phones in case they want to see where they're at?

      Oh course it would only be fair for the owner of the cell phone to disable these features, but the industry sure isn't helping. You can put your head in the sand and pretend this purely a social problem, but its really a technological problem mixed with a social problem.

      Simply put, the tools should be a lot better considering typical human behavior.

    8. Re:So much BS, so little time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People were irritating in theaters before they had cell phones. There have been people talking, having big hats, having big hair, being fat, having crying children, having body odor and everything else ever since we've gathered in groups to enjoy things together.

      People are the problem.

      People have been bad drivers since long before cell phones existed. Don't blame the phone for the driver's irresponsibility. People shave, put on lipstick, argue with their children, get drunk, you name it. Cell phones are not the problem.

      Cars are the problem.

      There is no conclusive link between cellphones and brain cancer. The wall-powered microwave ovens people use everywhere have far greater capacity to do real damage to people than the battery-powered 7-days-without-a-charge cell phones. We actually know what microwaves do to flesh. We do it to food and water all the time. There hasn't been a problem with microwave ovens, much less cellphones.

      Microwaves are the problem.

      Sometimes one finds change in the couch. One rarely finds change in one's significant other. The comparison is meaningless.
      Emergency calls on a cell phone are always free. If it's not an emergency, why are you calling collect? Are you just cheap? Or are you making an emergency out of something that could really wait?

      I found a Liberty silver dollar in your old lady's box.

      Cell phones aren't actually obsolete in a year just because etc. Some people are sheep who will buy anything with a bigger number or cuter design. I've had my phone for two years, and I would have had my previous phone for five if I hadn't given it to a friend as a present. Computers are 'obsolete in a year' just as much as cell phones, but I bet you would rather have a two-year old computer than your very own payphone. Again the comparison is meaningless.

      I have my cellphone from '92. I can call in napalm attacks on Pork Chop Hill with it.

      Yes, payphones ARE the safest option if you're up to no good. So what?

      I'm pulling quarters out of your old lady and shoving them in the payphone I'm posting from. But so what.

      What's convienient about getting calls at payphones? Standing around waiting? The lack of privacy?

      Payphones smell different.

      There are cell phones which can be had with no long-term commitment or credit check. They're not cheap, but they exist.

      Payphones have no upfront costs.

      Cell phones don't have to come on vacations either. If you think they do, you need better friends. I like having a cell phone wherever I go for convienience, but it's a choice I make, not an obligation.

      Friends, good....

      Yes, when the payphone doesn't work, you walk/bus/hitchike/taxi to the next one. YAY.
      My cellphone has excellent reception. It's better than a lot of people's home land lines. If you've had bad experiences, it's probably because you or your friends are cheap, as mentioned above.

      I'm not cheap. I spend every dime I pull from your old lady's box. I don't need box cutters to do it either.

    9. Re:So much BS, so little time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, the hostages hold you!

      In post-Soviet Russia, terrorists try to save hostages while police are gassing them to death!

    10. Re:So much BS, so little time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hrm. Didn't have much sleep last nite?

      U do realise the post you got so riled up about is being humorous?

      I'm sure any one of us here could show you how BS your arguments are.

      I was hoping you were trying to be funny, but you're way to bitter.

    11. Re:So much BS, so little time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "OOh, listen to me. I'm soo much better than you. I'm smart and your just ignorant since you have cell phone envy"

      Jackass.

    12. Re:So much BS, so little time. by schwanerhill · · Score: 2

      >Are there a lot of phones that don't have vibrate?

      Yes. Including mine. I've looked into getting one, but you have to buy a vibrating battery for $35-40. Not terribly expensive, but I'd rather save the money and silence my phone in the theater. Also, for my phone, you can only get a Ni-MH vibrating batter (not Li-ion).

      Some people don't seem to realize that missing a call is not the end of the world--that's why we have caller ID logs and voicemail.

    13. Re:So much BS, so little time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus. I was probably 8 years old when I realized that my Mom was lying when she said that the bullies who picked on other kids were "just jealous." Yet you, presumably an adult, still think that cellphone bashing has something to do with envy. Grow up.

    14. Re:So much BS, so little time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At this point, I lost my patience and decided to teach her a lesson about social convention. I stood up, turned around, and announced loudly, "turn off your phone or I will whip out my dick and piss on you!" I think she thought I was kidding until I reached for my fly. Then she told the caller "gotta go" and just hung up. I said, "thank you for your cooperation," sat back down, and tried hard not to ruin the moment by laughing my ass off...

      OK... Does anyone believe this actually happened? I'm positive this is made up BS. It isn't particularly clever, at any rate.

      Why do people need to make up cockamamie stories about public heroics? The guy sat there and suffered through the phone call, later fantasized about what he wish had happened, then decided to tell people it did to make him feel better. How pathetic.

    15. Re:So much BS, so little time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's hilarious. In those pre-trailer bits in the theatre, this is what the soda cup should do instead of just 'shusshing' the audience.

    16. Re:So much BS, so little time. by Halloween+Jack · · Score: 2
      You make some good points, but like the person that you're responding to, you go over the top in a couple of places.


      People have been bad drivers since long before cell phones existed. Don't blame the phone for the driver's irresponsibility. People shave, put on lipstick, argue with their children, get drunk, you name it. Cell phones are not the problem.



      Ah, the "guns don't kill people" argument. Before cell phones became widespread, you just didn't have the sheer number of people who felt that they had an excuse not to pay attention to their driving. I'm not talking about accidents, even; I'm just talking about people who slow the flow of traffic down because they're yakking and ignoring the line of cars building up behind them. I have yet to see someone do this because they're grooming or yelling at the kids, and drunks usually have the opposite problem. Unless their vehicle has a flashing red or blue light on top, drivers don't need to be on the horn to anyone. If the call is that important, they can pull over to the side of the road.



      My cellphone has excellent reception. It's better than a lot of people's home land lines. If you've had bad experiences, it's probably because you or your friends are cheap, as mentioned above.


      That has more to do with where you happen to be at the moment. My cell phone reception was great when I lived on the fourth floor of an apartment building with a direct line of sight to a cell tower, not so good when I moved to a basement apartment. This was with an expensive phone and a provider with excellent coverage.


      Relax. No one's going to take your cell phone away because a few people forget to switch their phone off when they go to the opera. But, if you think that certain technologies don't lend themselves to abuse, you're only fooling yourself.

      --
      I looked into the abyss, and the abyss looked into me--and we both winked.
    17. Re:So much BS, so little time. by iiioxx · · Score: 2

      OK... Does anyone believe this actually happened?

      Well I do, since I was there at the time. And my wife does, since she was there also and tried to crawl under her seat after I did it. Of course, it's only my word. I don't have videotape of the event or a police report or anything. So feel free to believe it or not. If you knew me, you wouldn't have a hard time believing it at all. I have a "history"...

      It isn't particularly clever, at any rate.

      Sorry, I didn't have a lot of time when it happened to come up with something truly creative. My thought process was something like, "you're pissing on me by using your cellphone in a movie, so I'll piss on you..."

      I'm sure you would have come up with something far more creative on a moment's notice. Or maybe you would have just sat there and taken it, because you couldn't say something to the offender anonymously.

      Why do people need to make up cockamamie stories about public heroics? The guy sat there and suffered through the phone call, later fantasized about what he wish had happened, then decided to tell people it did to make him feel better. How pathetic.

      I don't know, why do people need to anonymously refute other people's stories in order to feel good about themselves?

      I think the real issue here is that this sort of thing has happened to you, and YOU just sat there an did nothing. Later on, you wished you had said something bold or witty. Now you feel like less of a man because I actually had the balls to say something and you didn't. So in order to regain your self-esteen you have to believe that my story is a fabrication, and that everyone else is a meek little mouse just like you.

      Sorry to disappoint you.

    18. Re:So much BS, so little time. by iiioxx · · Score: 2

      I like it. The cup could whip out his straw and hold it suggestively...

    19. Re:So much BS, so little time. by SuperPedro · · Score: 1

      People shave, put on lipstick, argue with their children, get drunk, you name it.

      I once saw a woman reading a book at the wheel.

      --
      Most sigs are dumb. This is one of them.
    20. Re:So much BS, so little time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I do, since I was there at the time. And my wife does, since she was there also and tried to crawl under her seat after I did it. Of course, it's only my word. I don't have videotape of the event or a police report or anything. So feel free to believe it or not. If you knew me, you wouldn't have a hard time believing it at all. I have a "history"...

      Ooohhh... You're dangerous.

      Sorry, I didn't have a lot of time when it happened to come up with something truly creative. My thought process was something like, "you're pissing on me by using your cellphone in a movie, so I'll piss on you..."

      It's no crime not to have thought of something witty on the spot. That's not the point.

      I'm sure you would have come up with something far more creative on a moment's notice.

      No, I would have foregone the whole process of trying to be stunningly witty and said something like, "Would you please shut up and hang up the phone?"

      Or maybe you would have just sat there and taken it, because you couldn't say something to the offender anonymously.

      On the one hand you dismiss me because I posted as an AC, yet you almost immediately replied to my post in an incredibly defensive tone. Methinks thou dost protest too much...

      I don't know, why do people need to anonymously refute other people's stories in order to feel good about themselves?

      Thank you for admitting I refuted your story.

      I think the real issue here is that this sort of thing has happened to you, and YOU just sat there an did nothing. Later on, you wished you had said something bold or witty. Now you feel like less of a man because I actually had the balls to say something and you didn't. So in order to regain your self-esteen you have to believe that my story is a fabrication, and that everyone else is a meek little mouse just like you.

      Well, at least your cleverness level remains constant. I bet if someone calls you stupid, you shoot back with, "Nu-uh, YOU'RE stupid!" and then pat yourself on the back for having "balls."

      Sorry to disappoint you.

      Oh, you didn't. Your knee-jerk, ultra-defensive reply to this mere AC nicely illustrated the implausibility of your story. If you'd really done what you said you did, you'd have ignored me. Instead, you flipped out, wanting sooo badly to prove you're the sort of bad-boy desperado you tried to pass yourself off as earlier. Now I KNOW you were lying. So thanks for the help.

      I eagerly await your reply, which should sound something like, "I did do it, and you're anonymous and don't have the balls I do and I know you are but what am I???" I'm sure it'll be swift, since you're probably sitting there with this thread open hitting "refresh" every 30 seconds.

    21. Re:So much BS, so little time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Or detect the doppler shift so the person can set their phone to "don't ring when I'm driving."

      This is a good idea, because it would also shut people up on buses and trains. There's nothing quite like being trapped on a train and having to listen to someone yakking on a cell phone.

      (Funny how "yakking" has become the commonly accepted verb for talking on a cell phone in public.)

    22. Re:So much BS, so little time. by mgblst · · Score: 2

      People were irritating in theaters before they had cell phones. There have been people talking, having big hats, having big hair, being fat, having crying children, having body odor and everything else ever since we've gathered in groups to enjoy things together.

      Great point... wonderful. And people killed other people before the widespread ownership of guns, but almost 12,000 deaths a year it was not. I suppose it is just a matter of degree.

    23. Re:So much BS, so little time. by mgblst · · Score: 2

      If she is sitting next to you, why don't you just grab her phone, and throw it. Seems like a much better solution, and one she is more likely to remember than some crude threat(which I thought was funny.)

    24. Re:So much BS, so little time. by iiioxx · · Score: 2

      If she is sitting next to you, why don't you just grab her phone, and throw it. Seems like a much better solution, and one she is more likely to remember than some crude threat(which I thought was funny.)

      Because once you make physical contact with a person, you enter into a whole new arena of legality. If I had reached out and grabbed her cellphone, then chucked it across the theatre, I could find myself facing a slew of criminal charges (assault, theft, and destruction of private property to name a few). Besides, why resort to violence? Public embarrassment worked just fine in that case.

  87. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Payphones use YOU!

  88. 2600.org - payphones of the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  89. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by tada_mac · · Score: 1

    for some strange reason people have a hard time concentrating on driving when using any kind of phone while driving, handset or hands free. They make more poor decisions and take more risks while engaged in a phone conversation. Same effect doesn't happen when conv. partner is in the car.

  90. Phone Phun by The+Tyro · · Score: 2

    I remember some of the monkey-wrenching articles you could find back in the BBS days.

    There was one in particular I remember called "Phone Phun", written by an individual named "Mr. Death" who lived in NYC. The article gave ruthless and detailed instructions on all kinds of things to do with pay phones... ripping them off, blowing them up, etc.

    It was an amusing read, despite the incredibly antisocial behavior it espoused. Still... I sometimes wonder what cellblock "Mr Death" might be inhabiting today.

    Heh... It's a wonder any of us survive to adulthood.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  91. Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to say it, but I'm on the board of directors for a 501(c)(3) tax exempt organization... we have a clubhouse downtown that members have the use of (and we have functions there on a regular basis). To keep us from having to pay a significant phone bill (we barely scrape every year), we put a pay phone in...

    We have to *pay* the phone company $25/month to have a payphone... and *they* keep all the money the phone makes. Still cheaper than forking over money for long-distance phone calls to Florida (from CT), but it seems insane.

  92. Re:Practical use for the remaining telephone lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about pay-per-use DSL?
    "Please deposit 75 cents for another 5 megabytes."

  93. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The environmental aspect of payphones is a stupid thing to consider. They are out there now in the 'environment' and we aren't all dying.

  94. I needed a pay phone the other day... by cballowe · · Score: 1

    I have a cell phone that serves me rather well, but it doesn't do much good if i forget it at home. I needed to get in touch with somebody while I was wandering around downtown Chicago and was looking for a payphone. After trying several L stations and finding the payphones there either behind the revolving gates (and not wanting to pay $1.50 just to use the phone) or not working, I ended up wandering to the one place that I knew had phones.


    Would have been nice to find one on a street corner or something

  95. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by hitzroth · · Score: 2

    Just because a cat has four legs doesn't mean that all four-legged animals are cats.

    The environmental hazard assoicated with payphone removal is that which results from the disposal of the payphones. The prolific use of cell phones are what's causing the revenue drought for the payphone companies. Decreased revenue equalls decreased reason to keep the phones in service. Thus some of the payphones are taken out of service.

    To reiterate: People will not be obliged to use cell phones instead of the now non-existent payphones. They already are using the cell phones. That's why the companies are digging up the payphones.

    --
    In mathematics, one does not understand things, one merely gets used to them.
    --VonNeumann
  96. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by hendridm · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    > the accidents caused by people using their cell phones while driving...

    You anti-cell phone activists make me laugh. There are two types of people in the world: those who enjoy the convenience of a cell phone, and those who bitch about how dangerous they are in traffic.

    It's the same with anything: those who like hunting, and those who preech about gun control. Those who like cigarettes and those who can't fathom why someone would want to pay to kill themselves (it's an entertainment expense, just like anything else).

    It seems the only thing that makes a person for or against something is whether they use it or not. How about just being neutral and allowing those who enjoy it use their phone.

    Ok, now bring on the sob stories about how your relative was killed by a drunk, rabid cell-phone user but the evil cell-phone user lived and your relative (who, incidentally, was 3 months away from graduation and pregnant with her 6th child) did not.

  97. Re:Obscure Futurama Joke by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

    ahhh, yeah. I'd like to make a collect call?

    --
    Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
  98. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by kevcol · · Score: 2

    Does that mean you wouldnt have use for these fine products? ;-)

    Based on your statement, is it fair to assume you have a sign like on a Greyhound bus that says not to talk to the driver while the vehicle is in motion? ;-) Hehehe..

    Seriously though, of course, paying attention to anything in addition to your driving when you are moving is hazardous. But you know that occasionally, you *will* have something else you are giving some attention to- talking to passenger, turning off Rush Limbaugh, scratching itchy balls, swatting an errant bee, whatever. You can't always have 100% attention to your driving no matter how much you try. I think laws trying to totally ban cell phone use in a car are way overboard. Ban CB and 2-way radios in cars then. "Must cleanse ourselves- save us from ourselves!"

  99. Phuck You, Asshole-ingitis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    let moo-ahh teacheth you a lessont.

    take a korter and swallow it. do lay same evuh-wee hour. when you need to shit, you will have enough moo-lah to make a fone call. after veceiving ecoli foisoning, stop usink lay fone. Yah?

  100. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by I+Am+The+Owl · · Score: 2
    Oh, fuck off. I own a cell phone and know damn well that I'd better use it while I'm not driving. All the major assholes on the road, the kind who cut you off, tailgate, or start moving just as a green light is about to go back to red, are all distracted and out there in lala land with a fucking cellphone pressed against their ear.

    People who smoke damn well better not do so in my presence, because I value my health. And people who feel compelled to chat with their significant other on their cellphones at any given time can stay the fuck off the road when I'm trying to get from point A to point B.

    --

    --sdem
  101. Prove it. Stop your speculation. by AnonymousCowheard · · Score: 1

    a drunk driver...runs off the street and smashes the payphone.

    a wet road under speeding traffic...a car runs off the road and smashes the payphone (or respective callbox).

    a robbery...the crooks hide inside the payphone and direct to the police what the get-away car and robbers looked like and lead the police away from them for a clean get-away.

    a building on fire...the fire-department must shutdown electricity and gas in the surrounding area and that includes payphones because the common modern payphone requires power for all of its "features" and will not operate with mere line voltage.

    a tornado...payphones are first to be ripped out of the ground and crushed under chickens, eggs, and toaster ovens.

    a flood...phone circuits are shorted and no longer work.

    a lightning storm...phone circuit operators must hide in a special room or else the lightning will run through their patch pannel and zap anyone who has fillings in their teeth (everyone).

    a hurricane...there is no payphone.

    the matrix...only good for a secure phone call less than 10 seconds, else some guy in a tuxedo drives a cement truck into the same booth you are occupying.

    Can you hear me now? Ahhhhhh!

    CONCLUSION: PAYPHONES ARE DANGEROUS AND CONTRIBUTE TO DANGER AROUND THEM. THEY SHOULD BE REMOVED!

    (this post sponsored by dialpad.co !@#$ Ahhhhhhh!)

    --

    But I'm sure you already Gnu that.
  102. Why not free? by iamacat · · Score: 1
    Put one in Safeway that lets you make a free 10 minute local call after you listen to a 30 second ad on whatever they want you to buy. For a little viral effect, also make the other end listen to the ad.

    Perhaps base phone service is so cheap this days it has to be subsidized by or sold together with something else. Good quality video payphones that can call each other or a DSL-connected PC: priceless.

    1. Re:Why not free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      go eat a bag of hell

    2. Re:Why not free? by W32.Klez.H · · Score: 0

      because advertising based services are ineffective, if you haven't noticed this whole dotcom fallout thing.

    3. Re:Why not free? by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? Then how come those over-the-air TV stations are still in business? It's just ineffective advertisement that is going under. Passing a supermarker isle stocked with stuff that you just heard about is as effective as it gets.

  103. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

    Actually, there's a third type: the people like you who will loudly defend their right to use a cell phone wherever and whenever - in a theater, in their car, etc.

    Some people can multitask safely with a phone and a car. Many others can't. I, for one, get quite annoyed when someone sits in a green light, not moving, 'cause they're yakking on their phone.

  104. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
    I have to agree. I read the story header and all was well and then there was that stupid sentence about the environment? Who gives a f*ck? It's kind of like whenever an article doesn't have enough "meat" to make it interesting, throw in an environmental angle to see if THAT will generate some discussion.

    There were three tornados in some town in Idaho instead of two, are we destroying the environment? A piece of ice fell off the south pole, is it global warming? Oh my God, people are buying new computers, are we contaminating China with our old ones?

    Fake concern for enviroment = lack of any other real argument. Throwing in an environmental angle is just Slashdot's way of being in the "in crowd." It's silly.

  105. Re:Again, back to the basics by fantastic · · Score: 1

    check out virgin mobile US for pay as you go....

  106. It is all about total cost of ownership. by AnonymousCowheard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let us face the facts...the Line-driven phone system is surprisingly obsolete.

    In Poland, and many other countries I don't remember, the Phone system consists of a cellular network! Many people disagree with cellular systems, out of fear of medical influences; that is reasonable. Yet ther is no other ethical wireless alternative to microwave other than what? Pick somthing that doesn't need to be ran through a medium; fiber optice need not apply, infrared could imply somthing good, wire is back to stage1. The total cost of ownership of modern phone booths on an out-dated phone system is the problem. They take too much space, too much maintenance, and are generally not reliable in all situations of elemental emergency (vehicles that smash into them, storms, vandelism,etc). What they need is a more ethical data-networked system. Future phone booths may as well be a service provided by a local internet cafe, that is the technology I think will reserect the layed-off .com people back into a profitable battle. A phone booth today gives me no reason to visit it...unless I can download the latest linux kernel in less than 100 seconds for $1.00. With such a more efficient data network, membership would be based on unlimited use, bandwidth/quality that you desire, congestion status of the network, and/or a random non-member use that is payable at the node (aka receptacle/phone).

    Total cost of ownership of computer hardware is much lower than qualified line installers running around an area creating ground loops and phucking with a phreaking system of accousticly line-driven phones. Can you imagine, maybe membership of your internet service provider could provide access to such a future communication booth. That is worth the clustered effort for such as wireless system!

    --

    But I'm sure you already Gnu that.
  107. BEEPBEEPBEEP by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

    Payfones arent quite dead yet, i have a cell fone, but i still carry around a keychain recorder with red-box tones on it. A free fone call is cheaper than my pre-payed cellular. ^_^

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:BEEPBEEPBEEP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have your eMail address and we will be initiating your membership to PayPal in a few minutes to initiate a financial transaction.

      Thanks for your patronage,
      -Verizon Technician

  108. Why would they be junked? by ONOIML8 · · Score: 2

    I realize that it's all the rage to worry about the environment everytime someone sneezes. But......

    Why would these things be a threat. I thought the would contain all sorts of valuable metal that would be recycled. I guess my thought was that would make sense for financial reasons (recover some $$$) if not for feel good enviro whacko reasons.

    Am I missing something here?

    .

    --
    . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
  109. Big Deal! by iamacat · · Score: 1
    I saw Two Towers yesterday and heard a couple of ring tones. No big deal. I just kept watching, didn't even look and check who it was. If it did bother me, I would just ask them politely to turn it off or go outside.

    Small annoyances like cell phones or crying children do not bother me. It's much worse to have a bozo making a big deal of those things. Like a neighbor who threatens to talk to my manager because I use a dance pad at 8pm.

    It's no fun to live if you have to be polite and considerate all the time, in every aspect. I do set my phone to vibrate, but sometimes have to explain some scene in the movie to my english-challenged girlfriend. Sometimes needs of a few or one outweigh the needs of the many.

    1. Re:Big Deal! by op00to · · Score: 1

      Any loser who plays DDR at any time anywhere other than designated arcades and laundromats should be ridiculed and persecuted as much as possible. When will people learn that DDR isn't cool, and talking about DDR is even more uncool?

    2. Re:Big Deal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, yuo got it all wrong. Any loser who plays DDR at any time anywhere should be ridiculed and persecuted as much as possible.

      Thank yuo for yuor co-operation.

    3. Re:Big Deal! by iiioxx · · Score: 2

      Small annoyances like cell phones or crying children do not bother me.

      That depends on how small an annoyance it is. A short ringing of a phone followed by a muffled "oh, shit" from the owner as he rushes to stifle it is a small annoyance (and not worth making an issue of). The person who gets a call in a theatre, lets it ring long enough to read the caller ID, then answers it and proceeds to carry on a conversation during the movie is more than a small annoyance. They are a nuisance.

      Also, I've never once complained to a parent about a crying baby if the show was a kid's movie. If you go to see Ice Age, you'd better expect to see children there, and to accept the social effects that children create. Now, the parent who brings a baby to a 9pm show of Two Towers is just an inconsiderate piece of human shit. Especially when the baby starts howling during the battle at Helm's Deep and the parents refuse to take the baby out (because THEY don't want to miss anything). Can you tell I've been there..?

      It's much worse to have a bozo making a big deal of those things.

      I think it is because NOT ENOUGH people make a big deal about these things that rudeness and discourtesy are allowed to flourish. Our societal structure works on about 10% legislation and 90% peer pressure. You can't legislate courtesy and police rude behavior. You can only use peer pressure to correct the behavior. Often, verbal censure is enough to do that. In general, people want to be thought well of. If they suddenly realize that their behavior has caused them to be cast in an ill light, they will alter their behavior to fit into society's boundaries of polite behavior. I think there are a lot of people who simply don't realize their behavior is inappropriate, because no one has ever said anything to them.

      Like a neighbor who threatens to talk to my manager because I use a dance pad at 8pm.

      Here's a perfect example. Your neighbor is a bozo because you think YOU should be able to DDR anytime you like. Take a minute to put yourself in your neighbor's position: you work all day, come home, eat dinner, get the kids off working on their homework, sit down in your comfy chair to watch a little ESPN before you pass out from exhaustion, and your neighbor starts jumping up and down on the floor above. Don't you think your neighbor is entitled to watch ESPN in relative peace whenever they want?

      If you want to be able to DDR whenever you feel like it, simply get an apartment on the ground floor (I assume you are second story plus, because a concrete slab doesn't reverberate). You can put on headphones and DDR at 3am and no one will complain. All it takes is a little awareness of how your behavior impacts those around you, and a small amount of accomodation. If you happen to be the Lord of the Dance, well then (DUH!) don't get an apartment on the second floor! It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out.

      It's no fun to live if you have to be polite and considerate all the time, in every aspect.

      I don't think that's true. I think you can be very happy and have a lot of fun while still being considerate of those around you. Unless you simply can't have fun without jumping up and screaming "Yeeehaaww!!" in the middle of a crowded restaurant because you just beat your friend at that peg game thing. Maybe your mommy never taught you this, but we have "indoor voices" and "outdoor voices"...

      If you want to be regarded by society as an adult, you have to act like an adult. Unfortunately, there are a lot of 21+ children running around in our society today.

      Sometimes needs of a few or one outweigh the needs of the many.

      That's never true. Just ask any Vulcan.

    4. Re:Big Deal! by iamacat · · Score: 1
      Don't you think your neighbor is entitled to watch ESPN in relative peace whenever they want? Well, a point can be made that I am "entitled" to play DDR whenever I want. Or that I should go complain to the manager whenever I don't like the smell of his ethnic cousin coming from downstairs before he retires to his ESPN. Or that parents of small children should be able to watch two towers.

      I think a big part of freedom in US is that we can all annoy each other - with noises, smells, dress styles, and public displays of affection - in order to live as we like. If you take it away, you are left with polite but very regimented society. Those who give up freedom for quite...

    5. Re:Big Deal! by iiioxx · · Score: 2

      I think a big part of freedom in US is that we can all annoy each other ... Those who give up freedom for quite...

      Freedom taken to it's ultimate extreme is anarchy. There's an old saying that goes well in this topic:

      "Your right to swing your fist ends at my nose."

  110. Is this just a reaction to market oversaturation? by ggroth · · Score: 1

    After Ameritech opened up the market to other providers of pay phones in Chicago, there was an epidemic of pay phones installed in the city. Most of them from out of state companies, and there was a lot of confusion on how to obtain refunds when problems occured. There was also a question of whether or not the phones were being targeted to low-rent districts, and being used for drug operations. In response to this, Chicago created a crew that drove around and ripped out these fly-by-night payphones. Perhaps the market is adjusting to the influx, although this would seem to have happened in prior years.

    Another thought is that after Ameritech released it's stranglehold on the payphone business, the quality of the phones themselves seems to have suffered greatly. I remember a store I worked for back in the 80's had two Ameritech payphones out front. The manager decided to pull them, and replace them with phones from another vendor, to make more money. The phones would need service on a monthly basis for repairs due to vandalism, where the Ameritech phones worked for years without a problem. Needless to say the new phones that were supposed to make money didn't, in fact they cost money. The payphones were removed permanently a year later.

    Watching the community around me, I can't help but wonder if people decided to quit using payphones simply because of their unreliability. It seems that payphones have become a target for aggression for every person looking to settle a domestic dispute in public. Anytime I see someone using a payphone around my house, half the time the person is on the phone screaming at someone, and ends the call by trying to break off the claw that hold the receiver by slamming the phone down. Perhaps if the phones had been made better over the years, people would actually use one when necessary. I don't like Ameritech, but their payphones were bombproof in comparison to the stuff you find hanging on the walls nowadays.

  111. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by ramzak2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i disagree. When you have the occupants sitting inside the car its easier for both of you to adjust your conversation level depending on how tight the traffic is or how much of attention level is required. It would be difficult to expect the person on the other end of the phone to have similar understanding.

    Besides that the difference between using a headset and talking to someone beside you is same as that between listening to your favourite song using a headphone and listening to it on a stereo. Which of the two do you think has a easier chance of having you preoccupied ?

    --

    Siggy Say, Siggy Do
  112. Environmental Hazzard?? by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 2

    "I wonder what kind of environmental hazard is posed by junking thousands of pay phones?"

    That's a truly stupid question, because all those payphones would hardly be a drop in the bucket compared to everything else in terms of the environment.

  113. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by rela · · Score: 1

    Good luck implementing all that.

  114. Pardon me if I'm inexcusably ignorant. by MulluskO · · Score: 2
    That is true for the two pay phones at the gazebo-style bus stop at Potomac Place Shopping Center. Those still ring in $120 to $130 every several weeks, mostly because that is the route the hired help take on the way to their clients' palatial houses nearby.


    Is the hired a thinly veiled euphemism for prostitutes?

    That's a choice demographic for payphone operators, I guess.
    --

    Too busy staying alive... ~ R.A.
  115. AT&T and MCI spend millions to get you to use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If pay phones don't make money for anyone, why do AT&T and MCI both spend millions and millions of dollars on those horrible TV commercials for 1-800-CALLATT and 1-800-COLLECT? Every one of those commercials features a pay phone.

    Like others here, I assumed that the cell phone industry was killing the pay phone, but AT&T and MCI are fighting hard to get the long distance business for these dinosaurs. They seem to spend far more on advertising those services than advertising their regular long distance services.

    Obviously, these companies have identified significant amounts of profit to be made here and they are willing to spend mammath amounts of money to get a piece of it.

    I have a feeling that it is the local phone companies that are taking a bath here. It looks like the long distance companies still see serious money from pay phones.

  116. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually it's very different. People inside the car can shut up if they see you're getting into a difficult situation on the road, but people on the phone can't and will keep on talking like nothing's happening. This is a big added distraction... Maybe video phones would work, but not dash-mounted TV screens... Like a fisheye view of traffic around the car... And you and me both know that's never going to catch on :-)

  117. "junking thousands of pay phones" by jesser · · Score: 1

    I wonder what kind of environmental hazard is posed by junking thousands of pay phones?

    Umm, discontinuing to build pay phones decreases the total number of pay phones junked over a sufficiently long period of time, because all pay phones will eventually die.

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  118. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by lazlo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is another big difference between talking to a passenger and talking to someone on the phone. If I'm talking to a passenger, there is some chance that they will cause me to look at them, to make eye contact. My wife often complains that I don't look at her when I talk to her enough, but even once while driving is too many times.

    I also have often wondered about how the laws about cellphones are written such that they cover cell phones but not cb's. And for some reason it really bothers me that there is almost certainly an explicit or implicit exclusion for police.

    But, in a vain effort to swerve this post from its current tangent back towards on-topicness, the one thing that seems to bother me the most about the disappearance of payphones is that they're often very usefull in emergencies. Not everyone has a cellphone, and there are often circumstances which render them useless (bad signal reception, low battery, etc...) It's nice to have a hardline here and there where 911 can be dialed with ease, if you happen to see an accident or a fire, or a lynch mob, or perhaps if you're experiencing a heart attack or just went into labor. Granted, these are not common occurences, and the telco's certainly shouldn't be forced to maintain costly infrastructure at a loss, but at the same time that payphones are being pulled down, local and state governments are erecting emergency call boxes. Would it be all that hard to have the government agencies that are erecting the call boxes just use that money to pay the telco's to maintain their payphones? It seems like there should be a middle ground here....

    --
    Pound! Bang! Bin! Bash! is this a shell script or a Batman comic?
  119. THERMITE! by cswiii · · Score: 2

    Oh c'mon, is the Slashdot crowd so young that it doesn't know the Jolly Roger or Anarchist cookbooks? The more "well read" of us all know what thermite is said to be capable of, regarding payphones... plenty of good use, there!;)

  120. On-topic cartoon by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1
    --
    If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  121. Good timing for this article by bobcat7677 · · Score: 1

    A guy showed up at my work the day after christmas and ripped the pay phone out of the lunch room. Said we weren't generating enough revenue for it anymore. So I gotta wonder: how is it that revenue was a problem? The company paid for the line and it's inside the building so only our relatively responsible employees used it (IE it didn't get broken.) So I figure whatever little usage was on it was profit for the carrier. Granted everyone uses their cell phones pretty much now but a few people would still use the pay phone. It may not have been much but it was in theory pure profit. I am starting to suspect that the carriers are viewing the whole thing as a lost cause and are systematically taking them all out reguardless of if they are still generating a little revenue or not...

  122. Low-income communication... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Payphones are crucial infrastructure in low-income neighborhoods, where often people can't afford landlines in their homes, let alone mobile phones.

    There's one down the street from me in front of a little autoshop; it gets pretty much constant use throughout the day. Yes, I know the stereotype that you are all going to bring to this, and no, it's not about drug dealing or whatever. These are normal neighborhood folks who have no other option at the moment.



  123. Discarded batteries harmful? by pclminion · · Score: 2

    If you work on some sort of project requiring a power source, you could use your old phone and battery as a power source. The phone becomes a very fancy charger. The cell battery itself is pretty nifty, and it's basically free since you were going to throw it out anyway.

  124. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by kevcol · · Score: 2

    Ok, you guys have some good points. I will send the subject back to brain for further tests. :-)

  125. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by zcat_NZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here's my theory;

    When talking to a passenger, the passenger is actually there with you. They know when you're not paying attention because you need to focus elsewhere. When you're on a cellphone the other person will keep talking at times when a passenger would know to stop. They'll ask "are you still there?" when you're trying to concentrate on something else and don't reply to them.

    Handsfree phones don't solve this problem. After a while you learn to just ignore the phone when you need to focus elsewhere; some people never learn; some people have a few accidents in the process.

    --
    455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
  126. Woah. de ja vu. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I work hard to make sure I have the resources to live the kind of life I want to live. I want the ability to stay in touch with people I go shopping with so we don't have to agree to meet at the food court. If my girlfriend is in a car accident again, I want her to be able to reach me as soon as possible. If there's an earthquake and I'm trapped in a building, I want to be able to call for help and tell them I'm alive but bleeding and running out of air. If I'm on an airplane and hostages take over with box cutters, I want to say goodbye to my girlfriend before the plane runs into a building.



    That's what the guy at sprint so rudely interrupted me with and crammed down my neck. I kept saying "HA...I know...HA...yes let me say...HAM FUCKING RADIO"

    Most cell phones are not usable in airplanes that are 20,000+ feet in the air, due to the lack of available high-speed switching cell towers. From what I heard, the people in the hijacked jets of 9-11 were allowed to make phone calls from the jet-phones. One guy was able to sneak into the toilette and make a cell phone call; maybe because the plane's altitude was optimal for skipping through the cells or simply excellent cell service coverage...we can only speculate, especially when the lower the plane goes the geographical features can skew the signal. As for earthquakes, a bad earthquake puts everything out of service...communication towers are damaged, the loop is disconnected, and the power that allowed operation to all the utilities usually has its ground lines severed in a major earthquake; I'm talking about the elusive Californian 8.0+, not a common Alaskan 12.0+, but a simple 4.0 to 5.0 magnitude earthquake in a given area. Most Communication lines that go near a fault in the ground are kept well above ground, yet how did I get to this subject? Oh yeah, anything can happen and a swiss-army-knife of Cell Phone technology is just as prone to defect durring an emergency as toilette paper in a bathroom at a mexican restaurant durring the refried bean festival.

    The only tool that is self-sufficient in operation is a *drum roll please* HAM Radio. CB Radio is no good because the signal is too low of frequency to spread through dense walls and buildings at ground level of a city, then again same happens a bit with the average amateur's No-Code qualified priviliges. Also, CB Radio is near-never monitored in a city by emergency/enforcment personel due to the dis-organized and vulgar state of its users; count me in! There is no public service communication technology that is self-sufficient other than personal tranceivers such as Ham. The Communication Skills the average Amateur Radio operator provides durring the event of an emergency is priceless and is why it is always successful; they are educated. I am not licensed by the FCC, so don't make any assumptions about my knowledge :-). You can own a tranceiver and listen to it, yet when you Push To Transmit, the next alphabet nazi of the gang, the FCC, attempts to include you into their jurisdiction of controlling mother nature's radiation of electro-magnetic waves. United States is the state of its people...let me puke alone.

  127. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by Yo+Grark · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd agree with this EXCEPT that a person talking to the driver knows when the driver has to concentrate on something coming up and instinctively SHUTS UP.

    Concentrating on Talking while driving actually distracts people from driving well. Bad drivers can often be seen doing all the talking while driving. Basic natural instinct, you cannot devote concentration power to upcoming events (getting cut off and allowing the extra space) and hold a full blown 2 way all out conversation.

    Drivers do their best thinking/working shit out because the mind is alive with activity while driving, just don't ask them to concentrate on a conversation with someone else.

    Think about it the next time you're driving :)

    Yo Grark
    Canadian Bred with American Buttering.

    --
    Canadian Bred with American Buttering
  128. Where pay phones won't vanish by shamir_k · · Score: 1

    Places:

    1. Large parts of the world where there is no cell-phone coverage, and where people live and travel
    2. Places where a particular cell-phone may not work, even though there is coverage. Like when you take a CDMA phone to a GSM only area or vice-versa. Or when you don't have roaming. (eg. Airports)
    3. Places where people make long calls, don't have land-lines of their own, and pay-phones are significantly cheaper than cell-phones. ( eg. University towns in the developing world)
    4. Places where most people don't have cell-phones.
    5. Places where most people don't have phones.

    This sounds like a large part of the earth to me. Guess pay-phones will be around for a long time, even if they are not on every street-corner in the developed world.

  129. class war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what about us folk who cant afford a cell phone?

    1. Re:class war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about us folk who can't afford a pay phone?

  130. Columbine Highschool? You asshole! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When they were both shooting people, I was trying to make a phone call...deciding whether I should dare to attempt to use the feces-covered phone. I was afraid of disease afterwards. Why would you do such a thing? Immoral and illogical. You are evil!

    I'm just the guy that installs the needle in the coin return slot just for that cheap bastard to stick his anti-AT&T probe into the slot and receive HIV courteous of me. I'm logical...survival of the fittest...yet I'm immoral. That makes me what, the Anti-Christ? Ecoli would make a nice subject. :)

  131. Superheroes will be obsolete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oooh - autonomous ground vehicles! Who needs Superman?

    DARPA intends to conduct a race of autonomous ground vehicles from the vicinity of Los Angeles to Las Vegas in 2004. A cash prize will be awarded to the winner. The purpose of the race is to encourage the accelerated development of autonomous vehicle technologies that could be applied to military requirements. Many of the details of the race are being developed. New details will be posted to this web site as soon as possible.

  132. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by op00to · · Score: 2

    The main reason why CB's and Ham radio users are exempt from this is mainly because they lobby a lot so their interests are reflected in the legislation. Really. I am a member of the ARRL (National Ham Radio Organization) and they have people in Washington who prevent legislation like the cell phone bans applying to them. Another reason is that most Ham users are involved in one sort of community service utilizing their radio and their vehicle, so it would be pretty detrimental to prevent that. Also, if you ban two way radios, what will the cops do?

  133. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by Corgha · · Score: 1

    "Must cleanse ourselves- save us from ourselves!"

    I think the idea is more like "save us from the distracted driver in the vehicle barreling towards us at 80 MPH."

  134. payphone bodging by dj_virto · · Score: 1


    Here in Texas junkyard fortress phones sell for about $50, which is mostly for the aluminium. At one scrapyard I frequent, the pile is truly enormous.

    I bodged up a phreaky mailbox to dissuade my neighbours from stealing my mail every other day. It's actually not that hard to do, just add a door, a lock, and a mailslot. You can't beat it for style... a mailbox Captain Crunch would be proud to call his own.

    In my case I chose an old psuedo-victorian pedestal phone booth and set the thing in 400 lbs of black dyed concrete, even covering the bolts. It looks very cool, and nobody steals my mail anymore.

  135. Web Auctions, Third World, Recycling by leandrod · · Score: 2
    > I wonder what kind of environmental hazard is posed by junking thousands of pay phones?

    None. Just auction them online, and whatever is left send to Third World countries. When even them have no use for them, junkyard and recycling. After all, what's bad about iron?

    --
    Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
    DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
    GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
  136. Who the hell says we love the XBOX???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who the hell says we love the XBOX????

    It's a piece of crap.. buy a Playstation 2 if you're going to blow that kinda money on games ;-)

  137. sarcasm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look it up.

    And no, I'm not the original poster.

  138. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I think the idea is more like "save us from the distracted driver in the vehicle barreling towards us at 80 MPH."

    Both distracted driving and driving 80 are both already illegal in most states, so there's clearly no need for an anti-phone law.

    Talking on a phone has been proven to be no more distracting than talking to a passenger. When doing either, you should be careful to keep your eyes on the road, avoid getting too worked up, and always disengage the conversation in dicey situations.

  139. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by Golias · · Score: 1
    CB radios are exempt from proposed anti-phone laws for one simple reason above all: The CB inspires no sweet, vote-getting class envy. Nobody has ever said "that fucking yuppie with his fucking CB." Get the idea?

    As for the loss of pay phones making things tough for emergencies, I would be all for the idea of putting up emergency call boxes, like they used to have in England... as long as it was done by local municipalities, so people could vote in local referrenda whether they wanted them. Some neighborhoods should probably have one on nearly every corner, IMHO.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  140. IMO, the cause is obvious... by tlambert · · Score: 2

    IMO, the cause is obvious: most pay phones these days do not permit incoming calls.

    This is to stop drug trafficing. Looks like it's really working... ...about as well as the airport security being raised made it so the armed officers didn't need to come onto American Airlines flight 1731 out of Dallas/Forth Worth last Saturday, and yank people off the plane after it returned to the gate. Yeah, those rights we've given up have really bought us something, haven't they?

    It seems to me that the only thing it has done is make pay phones less useful to legitimate callers (for example, I needed to call someone from a pay phone recently, and talk to them for an extended period, but the inability to give them the payphone number so I could call them, give the number, and be called back, made it impossible).

    -- Terry

  141. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'd agree with this EXCEPT that a person talking to the driver knows when the driver has to concentrate on something coming up and instinctively SHUTS UP.

    Like hell they do. Every woman who I have ever let ride shotgun with me just goes right on no matter how important watching the road gets. I even had one girl decide it would be really sexy to whip out my crank while I was negotiating a winding narrow highway. Now, most guys fantasize about getting a blowjob or handjob from his date while driving on the open road, but only a sick freak who gets off on near-death experiences would have let a situation like mine continue.

    (BTW: Ettiquite demands only one solution to my dilemma. I pulled over and let her know that we could continue driving after we got our rocks off. Safty first. You would think that this cautious attitude would turn her off, but it actually give you a chance to be the firm, resolute Alpha Male, which most chicks seem to dig, as long as you are not a perpetual asshole.)

  142. pay phones might get more use if-Disposable Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Not only were people able to buy cell phones that were now competitive with pay phones, but lower income people only had come up with around $50 or so to get a phone. "

    If so? Then why haven't disposable cellphones taken off?

  143. Re:Practical use for the remaining telephone lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I'd be happy if they just put a phone jack there, and required you to use a calling card on whatever you plugged in.

    Camping in Yellowstone, I bought an acoustic coupler thinking I could use it to get email for the 2 weeks I was gone. While the coupler worked fine (about 14.4) on any modern phone, the microphone on the payphones is only clear enough for about 2400bps. This means that in order to dial my ISP, I had to dial my house first, and then out from my house, as my ISP rejects connections that slow. If I'd had a direct jack to plug into, I probably would have been able to get reasonable speeds.

  144. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2

    "I own a cell phone and know damn well that I'd better use it while I'm not driving"
    Wow - okay okay, you can use your phone while not driving. Will you use it while you are driving tho?

  145. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by Golias · · Score: 1
    Throwing in an environmental angle is just Slashdot's way of being in the "in crowd." It's silly.

    I've noticed this trend too, and I'm beginning to suspect that it's the latest Editor Troll of choice.

    Complaining about Apple computers having only one mouse button is the old busted. The new hotness is expressing vague concerns about environmental impact.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  146. Re:Pretty soon-Obsolete communications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A lot of the young kids here on /. will be saying - 'I'm old enough to remember payphones'..."

    Pffftt! I'm old enough to remember the two tin cans and a string.

  147. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by Corgha · · Score: 1

    My point was that the primary motivation behind laws regulating motor vehicle use is not so much saving us from ourselves as it is saving innocent bystanders from us.

    Nowhere did I attempt to say that the anti-cell-phone laws are a good way to fulfill that motivation or that I think cell phone use is dangerous. If I have meant to say either of those things, I would have.

  148. Payphones would get more use if... by psyconaut · · Score: 2

    ....they made blue boxing work again! Infact, I guarantee payphone use will dramatically rise! ;-)

    -psy

  149. They have them in California by greggman · · Score: 1

    They are called Call Boxes. They are lined up down the freeway in bright yellow boxes with a sign. They are for emergency use only. Maybe that's all we need anymore.

  150. begs to be asked... by Vaughn+Anderson · · Score: 1

    Many pay phones, which used to generate hundreds of dollars per month in revenue, are now used so infrequently that they cost money to operate

    As opposed to the phones in the past that were free to operate?

    -v

    1. Re:begs to be asked... by Qender · · Score: 1

      I assume that they mean the phones cost the operators money despite people paying for the calls.

    2. Re:begs to be asked... by Doug+Lim · · Score: 1

      As opposed to phones in the past that brought in more revenue than it cost to keep them maintained.

    3. Re:begs to be asked... by Vaughn+Anderson · · Score: 1

      hehe, yes perhaps that is what was "meant" but that is not what was written. I am not one that likes to assume meanings.

      I just think it is funny that just because people writing to or posting on an electronic medium that proper grammar and attention to correct communication is easily set aside for speed of delivery.

      Hence you get confusing and almost meaningless statements, often in the story headlines, that the authors choosed to leave the readers to decode instead of spending an extra 30 seconds to 1 minute to edit themselves.

      Just cause it's amateur journalism doesn't mean we can't keep up to the grade school levels of writing quality.

      Now granted, I myself have falen into many times not clear, so that why I mentiond this hole think in a humourous light. :)

      -v

    4. Re:begs to be asked... by Vaughn+Anderson · · Score: 1

      hehe, considering this is news, I like to think I can trust the writer. If I have to guess what he's writing this adds a complexity to the whole news reporting concept that I'd prefer to leave up to the editors.

      Considering there seems to be no editors I will attempt to edit the story for everyone else's benefit.

      *clears throat*

      StarEmperor writes "This Washington Post story of grandeur reinterates the seemingly constant, but approvable, disappearance of the modern day pay phones, well known now as"rip off phones", mainly due to a small number of walkie-talkie like devices called "SELL Phones" being dumped into the mass market by the truck loads.

      Many of these public phone unit devices, which history records ever so accurately as this is imporatant information to society, used to suck massive amounts of revenue from unwitting users by the dimes, often times piling up hoards of dollars called "hundreds" every 30 day cycle of the Roman calendar, which the operating company ran their pick-up cycle from.

      But sadly we now have compassion on the loss of these blessings to society as there are more rich people now, or poor people willing to go into dept to aquire a mobile talkie thing, with mobile talkie things and the value and use of the permanent talkie booths has dropped to the point where they actually cost money to operate, where as before they were free to operate cause they actually made money, but now they don't so they cost money to operate. Ultimately the question begs to be asked, what's the value for the environment for junking hundreds and even multiple hundreds of non-mobile talkie things?"

      -v

  151. What are tourists gona use???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mobile phone roaming is 2 to 5 dollars a minute, and i know more and more people that prefer to use phone cards for 3c per min on public phone cards, well at least in australia and europe there are PP everywhere.

  152. The reason I switched to the 'dark side' (mobile) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, increasing to 35, then 50 cents. That sucked, a lot. But every pay-as-you-go wireless plan I've seen was an insult. They're even more convoluted and expensive. I imagine they're designed more for people with poor credit than infrequent users.

    But this month (Dec) Virgin Mobile was selling their pay-as-you-go phone for only $60 (afaik it's going back up to $100 in Jan.).

    The plan is really simple and pretty affoardable. $.25 the first 10 minutes of the day (cheaper than a payphone right there), $.10 after the first 10 minutes. $.10 to send a text message, free to receive. You have to add money to the phone 90 days from the last time you added money (which kinda sucks, but all the other companies have even stricter limits).

    It's just too bad that they almost exclusively market it to teens. The Internet browser goes to VH1 and MTV branded features (I dig the Spongebob Squarepants wake-up call though). Even the TOS has cheesy language. Under the area where it says you can't make unsolicited phone calls it quips, "Spam is bad!"

    Speaking of spam, sorry that this is sounding like one, but AT&T, Verizon, et. all are committing highway robbery compared to VM's pre-pay. Hopefully they'll get more competitive.

  153. Re:pay phones might get more use if-Disposable Pho by jez9999 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because they're the most idiotic idea ever dreampt up. Why buy a NEW phone each time you need more credit when you can keep a higher quality phone, and merely buy credit at the store?? Can you think of the waste caused by 'disposable cellphones'?

  154. Cool thing to do with them anyway ;-) by Vintermann · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What do you do with the huge adress book in your cell phone? I fill it with pay phone numbers. See, sometimes I want to dial a person. Other times I want to dial a place, and the person is not important.
    I have collected about a hundred or so I suppose. Shared them with my friends of course. We sometimes dial them to ask some stranger what the weather is like there, whether the bakery has some nice offers etc. Sometimes we play music at them.

    Responses have been entirely positive (it's not harassement, after all, if you actually take a pay phone that's ringing, you're expecting to be suprised).

    Wardriving sounds fun, and a lot more useful than this, but hey, not everyone can afford a wireless card...

    Want to try? I'll share some of my numbers with you. They're in norway. so it's expensive for most of you, but... just remeber to put 047 in front of them to get out of your own country.

    Some boxes near Bislett stadium in Oslo:
    22565586
    22607202

    Box near (a duious) pub in my hometown. Call it at midnight on a friday for an interesting chat.
    70132334

    A mall in Oslo, Byporten:
    22171821

    Airports are full of bored travelers. Here are some numbers for Gardermoen, Oslo:
    63975924
    63983701
    63982832
    63983706 ...And some more...
    63983703
    63982831 ..and some from the airport in my hometown, Vigra
    70183623
    70183622

    Karl Johan is the main street in Oslo, always a busy place:
    22834080
    22834978
    22835775
    22835777

    A subway station in Oslo, Grønland:
    22174166
    22175106
    22175563
    22175567

    The school where I'm trying to become a software engineer (phone boxes outside the toilets):
    70126928
    70128975

    OK, that's it for now. I can't guarantee no typos, or that some boxes may have been taken down. If someone could post numbers for boxes in their surroundings, I'd be grateful (preferrably in a more relevant/permanent forum than this slashdot thread)

    --
    xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    1. Re:Cool thing to do with them anyway ;-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just called the last one (near the toilets):

      Me: Hello, is someone pooping there right now?
      Guy: Eh?
      Me: Pooping? Is someone pooping right now?
      Guy: (Norwegian accent) You are American? Are you pooping?
      Me: No, no, are YOU pooping?
      Guy: Pooping?
      Me: POOPING
      Guy: *click*

  155. Payphones are an eyesore by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 2

    US payphones, European payphones and UK payphones.

    Good riddance.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  156. What kind of environmental hazard? by alfaiomega · · Score: 2

    "I wonder what kind of environmental hazard is posed by junking thousands of pay phones?"

    I don't know about other things in pay phones, but I've heard that quite a few kinds of birds can easily choke while eating quarters.

    --

    root@aio:~# nmap -sX -iR -p1- # Ho, ho, ho! Merry Xmas, everyone!

  157. Unlimited Free Calls - Background Advertisements by jcasey · · Score: 1

    How about offering unlimited free calls? The catch would be that you play advertisements in the background as the two parties talk. As long as they are on the phone they are exposed to advertisements playing in the background.

    This is the same idea behind those annoying banner ads that we have all learned to block out :) - Hell, it seems to be working for netzero - why not?

    --
    X
  158. Sleeping Booth by TrippyZ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    And where am I supposed to sleep when I get drunk and can't find my way home?

  159. Sux for us non cell phone people by nurb432 · · Score: 2

    I had mine turned off after wanting to be LESS accessable.. No PDA, no PAGER, nothin..

    So if i need a WORKING booth, they are hard to find..

    A lot that are still out there are in dis-repair.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Sux for us non cell phone people by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 2

      So get another cell phone. Tell the phone company to block your phone number from caller ID. Never give out your phone number and tell folks your calling from a pay phone. You could also leave it off when you are not using it to make a call.

      Bada bing

      Bada b00m

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  160. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by zora · · Score: 1
    Dude, you need to calm down...

    First, I believe that humans (in general) are capable of multitasking, and can do a couple of things at the same time. Personally I can eat a Big Mac, Drink a Coke, Smoke, and drive a stick all at the same time. Haven't killed anyone yet, or even come close..

    Driving a car is not terribly difficult. Shit, I bet they could teach monkeys to do it. I was a master at Pole Position when I was six.

    Third, shit happens!!! Sometimes accidents just happen and someone happens to be on a cell phone, Can you say 'coincidence'. Or maybe you prefer to believe that the sun sets every evening because the street lights come on...

    --
    In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet, and say to us, "Make us your slaves, but feed us." - Dostoevsky
  161. intelligence by littleghoti · · Score: 1

    You get a nice correlation between money and intelligence. Whether this is due to growing p in a crap neighbourhood with crap schools, or social darwinism (the dumb end up with crap jobs, earning nothing) is a point I leave for discussion elsewhere.

    1. Re:intelligence by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2

      I'd like something more than guessing when you say that there is a correlation :)

  162. Oh brother by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    How pathetic is it that the first thought the original poster had was what kind of environmental impact this would have. He assumes they were not recycled (I scanned the article, didn't see that). This is non-impacting for me. I suffer from OCD, so frankly using pay phones were always a source of anxiety. >

  163. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by 1DarkZen · · Score: 1

    And ban stereos in cars also. Don't know how people can pay attention to the road when listening to the radio. And CD players. Don't get me started.... And Big thumping bass. Them damn young kids.

    Oh yea while you are at it, little kids in cars should be banned. The little brats asking questions while I am trying to drive.

    How about we just start holding people responsible?

    --

    "If Diet Coke did not exist it would have been neccessary to invent it." -- Karl Lehenbauer
  164. Environmental Hazards? by Maeryk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would imagine not nearly the environmental hazard posed by all the cell-phone people who upgrade their phones each time a new plan comes out with a free phone. Pay phones do not, that I know of, have batteries in them, and are fairly recyclable. (Aluminum, or in older cases, cast iron cases, which translate nicely to melting down). The plastics are recyclable as well.

    The fact that large companies (like phone companies or even large corporations) are now being watched closely when disposing of potentially dangerous materials (including computers) means they will probably be stripped, recycled, or waste-reclaimed in China somewhere.

    Not many of these phones would hit landfills as "phones" at any rate, unlike the thousands of Cell Phones that people tend to toss out like household garbage, complete with batteries, etc.

    Maeryk

    --
    Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
  165. Funny Tidbits by cascadefx · · Score: 2
    While studying Information and Communication Sciences I came across a number of interesting Telecom tidbits in one of the manuals we used for classes.

    The design specs for payphones are histerically funny to read. If I remember correctly, the coin boxes need to be able to withstand repeated blows from a Louisville Slugger baseball bat. Many that are used in "high risk" areas also have the ET function. They "phone home" when jostled too much or when they have been damaged (failing certain diagnostics) and alert the company that they are in need of service.

    My aunt was a switch technician for a while back in the early nineties and the red light district of her town generated a ton of calls for service from "customers." It seems when a payphone was having problems, it affected business and people needed it fixed pronto. They were also some of the most abused phones around. The stuff they would hear during a line test would melt your ears, supposedly.

  166. When there are no more Pay Phones....A GOOD THING by Figz · · Score: 1

    Then we won't have to sit through any more terrible commercials like 10-10-220 and the most heinous of all: Carrot-Top's 1-800-CALL-ATT ads. The Al Bundy ones sucked really badly too.

    Not that it matters anymore since I just skip through all my commercials anyway with ReplayTV. :-)

    --
    [figz@figz figz]$ kill -9 `ps -ef | awk '$1=="figz" { print $2 }'`
  167. Same problem in Germany... by DarkDust · · Score: 1

    We used to have lots of pay phones everywhere, in cabins. Very convenient when it's raining or snowing and you'd like to ask someone to pick you up from the train station ;-) For some time now (I guess two years) they have completely disappeared and were sometimes (if you're lucky) replaced with what I call "phones-on-a-stick"... and try to find one that accepts coins instead of pre-paid phone cards. Very annoying if you refuse to buy a handy ;-)

  168. Re:When there are no more Pay Phones....CORRECTION by Figz · · Score: 1

    I just remembered that 10-10-220 is probably just for home lines. But they really suck too. So there.

    --
    [figz@figz figz]$ kill -9 `ps -ef | awk '$1=="figz" { print $2 }'`
  169. Where it will all end by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 2

    This is the logical endpoint.

    --
    It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
  170. Why not modernize the supply for the demands? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, am I missing something here? A bunch of phonelines sitting in high traffic areas...How much could a powersupply, a DSL modem, and a cheap web appliance cost?

    well, I know I'd pay 50 cents...hell sometimes a lot more than that, for a few minutes of web access. I've found myself in situations where I *need* access to the web and my cell phone doesn't have that kind of access. What other goodies could they put in these booths to make them more useful and get their revenue back?

  171. Cell phones DO impair driving performance by ChrisCampbell47 · · Score: 2
    People have been bad drivers since long before cell phones existed. Don't blame the phone for the driver's irresponsibility. People shave, put on lipstick, argue with their children, get drunk, you name it. Cell phones are not the problem.

    Actually, they are the problem, according to carefully designed scientific* studies:

    http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/08/16/cell.phone.drivin g/index.html

    I see your point, that rude, stupid people wil continue to do rude, stupid things with or without cell phones, but to say that cell phones are not a problem is simply wrong.

    * - Oh, I'm sorry, are you one of those conservatives who circumvents science when it doesn't support your personal opinions and the political process has failed you?

    To quote Jenny Holzer, "the future is stupid".

  172. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 2

    Why does this class envy exist when cell phones are cheap enough for even homeless people to afford?

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  173. WAPs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Resell the phones, and use the existing housings to create (install) WAPs.. there have to be enough 7-11's and gas stations that all have phones to make most Metropolitan areas almost entirely wireless

  174. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People are responsible, but holding music in esteem with an actual conversation is a bit off the mark. Music tends to be passive listening; we do it but it doesn't require concentration. Talking to someone on the otherhand requires some sort of thought. And it might be that one instant that you're paying more attention to the conversation than the road when you get into an accident.

  175. This Sucks! How am I gonna demand my RAN$OM? by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

    How am I gonna call in my bomb threats and how am I gonna make anonymous tips to the police about crimes I committed? How am I gonna be a criminal mastermind when I grow up without a staple like the friendly payphone!

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  176. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by jafiwam · · Score: 1

    [I cannot say about any research, but can only report what is in my own mind.]

    Along a similar vein, I find speaking on a cell phone to be a very bad influence in my driving. (To the point that my wife thought I am pissed at her the first few times she spoke to me while I was driving, "yes, no, get to the point.") I do not like doing it at all.

    Speaking on a phone to a distant person requires holding two contexts in one's head; one for the conversation on the phone and one for the driving environment. Speaking to someone sitting in the car requires a single context to be held in the mind, and appears to be easier to do (and therefore safer) because the person sitting in the care is part of one big context, not two separate ones.

    It is the dual context that causes the problem, where the driver has to build the "meatspace" to manipulate ideas in two places at once. I even find that if someone is sitting in the back seat (requiring a bigger context) that my driving gets worse, even if there is no-one in the front seat at the time.

    I found that a very similar thing happens when I do online presentations, with audio on phone, on-screen presentation (local and remote), as well as controls to manipulate the environment. It is VERY tricky to set up the parallel threads in my brain to focus on all of it at once, it took several months to do it well. Some of my co-workers have never gotten the hang of it, and still cannot present well with online learning tools because they cannot run both contexts in parallel without making mistakes or forgetting to speak.

    I believe the cell phones are similar, the average person just is not wired to deal with the context of driving and the context of the conversation at the same time. (Though I bet people would get less dangerous if they set out to learn how to drive and speak on a cell phone safely.)

    Unfortunately, this means that the "hands-free" stuff will not make driving while talking any safer. (I remember some research that said that hands-free and handheld cell conversations had about the same distraction level.)

    Though I think the average person will not get good at speaking on a cell phone and will remain a road hazard, bans are likely to get ignored or repealed. I'd probably try something like doubling the fine or penalty for any road violation that occurs while the driver is on a phone, something to make people weigh the risks involved more carefully. (I see my neighbors use driving time as "talk time", always making calls as soon as they get in the car. Why not talk on the front porch for a minute?)

    Anyway, enough rambling about my brain.

  177. Re: Visa/MasterCard by nstenz · · Score: 1
    You do know that Visa and Mastercard use the same network, right?

    The MC option probably would have worked just fine.

    The damn thing still should have taken quarters, though, but we'll assume it didn't because you would've needed $20 worth of them or some crap like that.

  178. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In addition, a passenger might actually PREFER that you don't pay attention to them. I know more than a couple people who are really poor at talking and driving. More often than not I just try to avoid talking and end up saying "just watch the F*ing road" more than conversing anyway. Many people also tend to miss the point that a passenger is often an additional pair of eyes to warn the driver of some sort of danger.

  179. Money and Intelligence by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 2

    Keep in mind that not all people who have money are intelligent. And by this I mean more than just a few.

    There are 5 ways to come into money/wealth.

    1. Earn it by working for it. This includes starting your own business, or inventing something that sells well. Good money management is necessary here.
    2. Inherit it. Nuff said.
    3. Marry into it. Nuff said.
    4. Win it. Either from a lottery or a court settlement.
    5. Steal it or gain it via fraud.

    If there are any other ways please let me know. In my opinion which is in no way professional I would say that the bulk of rich folks are in categories 1, 3 and 5 with intelligence being a big factor in those categories. Number 2 would come in second but requires no intelligence and number 4 would come in last requiring very little intelligence.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:Money and Intelligence by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2

      But if you weren't too smart you could lose the money a lot faster. Hmm, although this is probably a factor of being educated as much as smartness. (I wouldn't have a clue how to properly look after large amounts of money)

    2. Re:Money and Intelligence by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 2

      Its not that hard. A sum of money is a sum of money, no matter the size. Put yourself on a budget and you'll be fine. Invest your money in low yield but high safety investments such as real estate, money market funds, fast food franchiszes...etc and it will grow with you.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    3. Re:Money and Intelligence by Dan+Crash · · Score: 2

      Well, the one way of earning money that's obviously missing from your list is investing, which how most of the rich earn theirs. This is not to say many of them don't work hard, too -- but their salaries pale in comparison to their investments.

      Investing isn't limited to the rich, either. Everyone who buys a house in investing in it. Where I live, most homeowners are earning $20,000 in equity each year, the equivalent of an entry level full time salary.

      I think one of the roots of poverty is that investing isn't really understood very well by poor people. The most valuable thing you have when you graduate high school is your unblemished credit rating -- keep it sterling, and you'll have the ability to get loans down the road when a good investment (like starting your own business, or buying a house) comes your way. Tarnish your credit rating with late payments or destroy it by overborrowing on credit cards, and you'll chain yourself to poverty for years -- maybe the rest of your life. The simple act of buying an expensive sweater you know you can't afford can create an incredible disaster down the road.

      If it were up to me, I'd require some knowledge of real world investing and small business planning to graduate from high school. We'd all be a lot better off if we did.

      --
      He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
  180. Payphones are history by MojoRilla · · Score: 1

    To me, the biggest problem with payphones was a bad user interface.

    To use them you need change. If payphones had a credit card slot on them, I think they would be a lot more useful. Of course the industry trys to convince me that prepaid calling cards are the answer, but then I have to juggle multiple incompatible cards, each one with some time on them.

    If payphones could accept some form of credit or rechargeable debit card, it would eliminate another expense of running them, the cost of removing the change from them. Of course, I'm sure that repairing them is also a major expense.

    Similarly, who still uses the outragously priced phones in hotels (other than to call 800 numbers)? The hotels priced the "service" out of usefullness with their 500% mark up. In fact, running phone lines to each room, having a phone in each room, and having a computerized switchboard is probably much less expensive than providing television and cable services to each room, yet those services are almost always free.

    Cell phones solve both problems quite nicely.

    1. Re:Payphones are history by 40000 · · Score: 1

      The credit card phones in the UK have a minimum charge of 50p. I can call a land line at weekends from my cellphone for 2p a minute (minimum charge 2p, no line rental). It costs more to phone a cellphone from a payphone than it does from another cellphone - it's about 40p a minute to call a cellphone from a payphone.
      Payphones aren't much use for making calls from, they are better for receiving calls on (instead of taking a long and expensive call on your cellphone you can go to a payphone, make a short cellphone call and then wait for them to ring back).

  181. Re:Again, back to the basics by vegetablespork · · Score: 1
    Thanks for the pointer--it looks from their FAQ like they only expire balances every 90 days, as opposed to Verizon, which expires smaller "replenishments" (on the order of $20) every 30 days, and larger ones (on the order of $50) every 60 days, which still amounts to at least my current monthly fee.

    It looks like Virgin Mobile's plan is available to the very occasional user (i.e. me) for about $7 per month. Thanks for the pointer!

    --

    Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

  182. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by Hal-9001 · · Score: 1
    Talking on a phone has been proven to be no more distracting than talking to a passenger.
    That is not true. There was a paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine proving pretty conclusively that the increased risk of an accident while talking on a cell phone is about the same to the increased risk of getting in an accident while driving drunk. This risk increase is independent of whether or not the cell phone is hands-free. Intuitively, talking with a passenger should be safer than talking with someone on a cell phone because the passenger is also in the vehicle and is aware of the driver's situation, so he or she can halt the conversation or call the driver's attention to the road in case of emergency. A person on a cell phone is oblivious to the conditions the driver is facing and has no such safety factor.
    --
    "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
  183. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by Gutzalpus · · Score: 1

    I'll talk on the phone in the car while I'm driving, but I tell people "hold on" when I need to do anything requiring full concentration (change lanes, turn, etc)...

  184. let them be art by shqippy · · Score: 1

    We could do with the payphone boxes what the Albanians have done with the hundreds of concrete-and-steel bunkers that former dictator Enver Hoxha littered all over the countryside (including the beaches). Make them works of art. People have painted flowers, murals, etc. on them, and have converted them from laughingstock outhouses into artworks. Payphone boxes, protecting their own insides from the elements, could be filled with art, murals, essays, community events, ads, etc. Maybe even an old-fashioned "speaker's corner," where free speech is encouraged on issues of the day. Post your paper.

    1. Re:let them be art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last thing I want is old payphones being a magnet for hippie trash. Move to Albania if you like that crap. I'd like the payphones to work, and if not, they should be removed and at least kept clean of graffiti if left in place.

  185. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by Recluse · · Score: 1

    Empirically, it seems to me that the majority of those who use cell phones while driving are -not- using headsets, hands free dialing, et al. they use the same tiny little crappy phone they also use in restaurants, movie theaters, and other public venues.

    All hail pay phones.

    --

    --
    Look ma, I'm a .sig
  186. How can anonymous calls be made? by sacrilicious · · Score: 2

    Without payphones, is there any way an anonymous call can be made?

    .

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  187. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by Hal-9001 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hands-free sets do not make driving while talking on a cell-phone any safer. See this paper from the New England Journal of Medicine for details. Basically, they cross-correlated traffic accident reports with cell phone logs and found that talking on a cell phone while driving quadruples the risk of getting in an accident, regardless of whether or not the phone is hands-free. This increased risk of accident is comparable to the increased risk of accident while driving drunk.

    The difference between talking on a cell phone and talking with a passenger is that the passenger is aware of the driving situation and can halt the conversation and/or call the driver's attention to the road in case of emergency.

    --
    "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
  188. Dr. WHO by ctimes2 · · Score: 2

    has been stealing them...

    --
    My cube. My friend. My solace. My prison.
  189. Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wait! How will Keanu Reeves get out of the Matrix if he can't get to a pay phone????

  190. What about Obscure Past and Present Rama Jokes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And who is this Rama person, anyway?

  191. Phone booth stuffing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I guess since it's a new era, it'd be how many college students can you stuff into the server room.

    I'm only posting as an AC cuz I'm too lazy to fill out webforms.

  192. Bell Canada: Payphones + 802.11b Access by Chris+Tyler · · Score: 1

    I think (gasp) Bell Canada is Getting It... use payphone locations for 802.11b access points. We talked about this a while ago but didn't focus on the payphone-subsidizing aspect...

    http://www.bell.ca/accesszone

  193. the article is not totally right. by abolith · · Score: 2
    My best friend runs about 25 pay phones in and around the local area and he still makes a few hundred a month off of each (somemore than others)and thats in an area that is considered "Saturated" by cell phone companies.

    --
    if you want "No More Hiroshimas" then I say "You First. No More Pearl Harbors."
  194. Ghetto by AlgUSF · · Score: 1

    If you want to see payphones, go to a convienience store in the ghetto. Some have like 4 or 5 payphones right next to each other. I wouldn't suggest using them though. :-)

    --


    I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
  195. its not free by nurb432 · · Score: 2

    sooo i pay 30 bucks a month to have something in my car that is turned off, and doesnt get used for months on end.. ya.. im made of money.. good idea... I think ill keep looking for to occasional phonebooth.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:its not free by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 2

      There are pre-paid plans you know

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  196. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by Golias · · Score: 1

    Because stereotypes are hard to break. I know a lot of people who would never consider buying a mobile phone at any price, simply because they want to avoid the stigma of becoming one of those cell phone owners they hate so much.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  197. Good riddence to the damned things... by TaleSpinner · · Score: 1

    *I* can remember the last time I used a pay phone.
    Or TRIED to, that is. Unless you are dragging
    around deep pockets full of change they are totally
    useless. The chances of finding one that would
    honor your call card is miniscule, the operators
    are unhelpful, the connection quality is lousy,
    the service totally non-existent. That last
    miserable, unsuccessful, money and time-wasting
    experience drove me to cell phones, and I'm not
    looking back. Let them join the other Bad Things
    of ancient history like bubonic plague and
    President Clinton.

  198. Re:So much BS, so many double standards by Lord+John+Whorfin · · Score: 1

    I guarantee that more people than those "right next" to you are aware when your phone vibrates (say, during a meaningful quiet point in any movie), let alone when you pull it out to check the caller ID. Conservatively, I'd say five seats in any direction are bloody well aware when you do that - you do the math and tell me how many people you just distracted from their $8 ($10 in NY/LA) movie.

    But you go further, depending on the call's "importance" (to you and the caller only) and, by your own admission, answer some calls. Odds are you're not a heart surgeon or in an equivalent emergency response/life-saving profession, though you clearly believe you are important enough to take certain calls during a movie. If you were actually considerate, instead of merely under the impression that you are, EVERY call would go to voicemail, because your phone would be off. It's two friggin' hours without a phone; if you're that busy/needed how do you have time for movies?

    You condemn the woman for being "above any petty social convention", but then proceed act virtually identically, ignoring the "Cellphone Free Zone" sign yourself, to answer a call if you "absolutely need to speak" to that caller. Wha...? What part of "No Cellphones" did you not understand?

    --
    "... insert the Windows NT Workstation 4.0 compact disc with your computer turned off." - NT installation manual
  199. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, eating fast food in cars is actually more dangerous than talking on a cell phone, and no one is talking about banning *that*.

  200. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    I wonder what kind of environmental hazard is posed by junking thousands of pay phones?

    Not to be a troll or anything, but what a piggish, excessive, truly American thing to say. What about the environmental impact of building thousands of pay phones?

    We don't worry about cool stuff when we're making it, we worry about cleaning it up later. Or we let the next generation worry about it.

  201. Another example of why by theCat · · Score: 2

    social engineering is stupid:

    Years ago they started taking pay phones out of poor neighborhoods. Why? Because drug dealers were using them to take orders and sell drugs. Advocates for the poor said removing pay phones would not stop drug dealing and would only hurt poor folk who could not afford phones in their homes and used pay phones instead.

    Now everyone uses cell phones to buy and sell drugs. And the poor folk STILL don't have pay phones because now there is not money in maintaining them.

    Oh wait...this just in...local governments are now taking down cell towers in and around poor neighborhoods so drug dealers cannot use cell phones to take orders and sell drugs. Advocates for the poor are claiming this will only hurt poor people, who cannot afford phones in their home and instead buy prepaid throw away cell phones.

    --
    =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
  202. fa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder what environmental hazard is posed by your existence? Suggest you go hang yourself and donate your remains for feeding endangered California condors.

  203. Re:So much BS, so many double standards by iiioxx · · Score: 2

    I guarantee that more people than those "right next" to you are aware when your phone vibrates (say, during a meaningful quiet point in any movie), let alone when you pull it out to check the caller ID.

    No, it really is very quiet. I've been standing around having a conversation with someone before and the phone rang, and they looked surprised when I pulled it out to answer it, because they never heard it go off. Now, there was one time when I happened to be leaning against a plate glass window when it went off, and a lot of people heard that. In fact, that's a real difficult noise to explain...

    Now, the backlit LCD might be a distraction, but it's pretty dim, and sometimes a little hard to read in the dark. I can't imagine anyone except those to my immediate left or right even noticing it if I pulled it out of my jacket pocket.

    But you go further, depending on the call's "importance" (to you and the caller only) and, by your own admission, answer some calls.

    It would have to be a pretty important call from someone I was expecting a call from (ie my doctor with lab results or something). I've had a cellphone for about 8 or 9 years, and I think the total number of times I have answered the phone in a theatre was two. One was to hear whether a relative 1000 miles away made it through surgery okay, and the other was from a client who was calling to tell me whether or not I got a big contract. And my idea of "answering a call" is to pick up the phone, quietly say, "Hi. Hold on just a second, okay.." and then step out of the theatre to take the call. That is no more disturbing than quietly saying to your wife, "I'll be right back" and then stepping out to use the restroom.

    You condemn the woman for being "above any petty social convention", but then proceed act virtually identically, ignoring the "Cellphone Free Zone" sign yourself, to answer a call if you "absolutely need to speak" to that caller. Wha...? What part of "No Cellphones" did you not understand?

    Actually, I said I "often" carry my cellphone at a theatre, but I don't always do it. That time, I DID turn off my cellphone and even reminded my wife to turn off hers, BECAUSE they had actually posted a sign (and that's the first time I've ever seen a sign like that at a theatre, although I expect they'll probably become a lot more common). If they hadn't had a sign, I probably would have left it on vibrate, if I had even brought it in to the theatre in the first place.

  204. payphones are for crack whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you go to the rundown section of my city, they have special payphones there, which cost three times more to make a call, dont have free directory listings, and are bright yellow in color and usually covered in puke

  205. call 2600! by cyberdog6 · · Score: 1

    advertise in 2600. those guys would love to take one of these apart, or just have it for decoration. they have payphones displayed like centerfolds in that mag.

    god knows what they'll do with one if they get it alone.

    --
    Evil is the money of all root....
  206. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by 1DarkZen · · Score: 1

    I was being a bit of a smartass, but I was thinking of people playing with their radios. Searching for stations, playing with the bass, looking for and switching CDs. Not to mention listening to music so loud that you can't hear what's going on around you.

    --

    "If Diet Coke did not exist it would have been neccessary to invent it." -- Karl Lehenbauer
  207. Re:mailboxes are disappearing too Scientologists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try setting up a webpage that carries information about the cult of scientology, of course, with YOUR name proudly displayed, and count the minutes until a firestorm of legal activity shuts YOU down.

  208. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    Charles Briscoe-Smith :
    After all, the gzip package is called `gzip', not `libz-bin'...

    James Troup :
    Uh, probably because the gzip binary doesn't come from the
    non-existent libz package or the existent zlib package.
    -- debian-bugs-dist

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...