Because the company can hire TWO 27-year-olds (or FOUR Indians) for what they have to pay you? Because of the "perception" that you're an old fart who's hopelessly unhip and not into the latest and greatest thing? Even though you're right, things should be done maintainably rather than fashionably?
Once you hit 45, you had better have moved into management, or be a white-bearded wizard with some kind of obscure language/system (MATLAB, SSA, SPSS, COBOL, DB2, etc.); otherwise, if all you know is stuff like Java/C/C++, you're going to be unhireable after the age of 50. This is the voice of experience speaking.
What utter nonsense. You're saying that wealthy Republicans weren't allowed to contribute before Citizens? Or that organizational contributions in general weren't restricted/limited? In a word, bullshit. What Citizens allows is unlimited, anonymous contributions by corporations under the legal fiction that they (as artificial persons) have MORE freedom of speech than natural persons. If the difference between that and what we had before escapes you, then I suggest you invest in a 7th-grade civics class.
You're forgetting about focus groups, which is where most politician's views/presentations are actually crafted. Polls are used as feedback for "how are we doing with 20 to 30 year-old Latino transvestites who self-identify as Republicans" to identify where (demographically) more advertising money needs to be spent.
Sorry, gotta disagree there. The "you typed it, you meant it" structure ADDS to the discussion. On "every comment other site" you see responses to comments that are NO LONGER as they were posted.
No, the "culprit" was admonished for shouting "You're lying" during a State Of The Union Address -- you know -- breaking decorum by acting like a drunken heckler at a comedy club.
Clearly, suggestions that she "should be taken out back and shot" or "fed into a wood chipper" are LITERAL threats that the posters are going to immediately drive cross country in a diaper to perform these acts. And statements like these clearly cross the line into "repugnant".
I seem to recall that the Framers Intent for free speech and freedom of the press were written by men who had actually *anonymously* printed TREASONOUS and SEDITIOUS pamphlets against their lawful government just a few years before.
Yeah, absolutely. If we're doing introductory inductees (say that 10 times fast) WoW doesn't really belong with Pong and Pac Man, especially in the abscence of Space Invaders and/or Galaga.
Slashdot Mirror
Because the company can hire TWO 27-year-olds (or FOUR Indians) for what they have to pay you? Because of the "perception" that you're an old fart who's hopelessly unhip and not into the latest and greatest thing? Even though you're right, things should be done maintainably rather than fashionably?
Once you hit 45, you had better have moved into management, or be a white-bearded wizard with some kind of obscure language/system (MATLAB, SSA, SPSS, COBOL, DB2, etc.); otherwise, if all you know is stuff like Java/C/C++, you're going to be unhireable after the age of 50. This is the voice of experience speaking.
Oh? How many native Hawaiians live on the summit of Mauna Kea?
"LaForge to bridge: Captain, the inertial dampeners are offline. Do NOT drop out of warp."
DIR :== PURGE/ERASE/NOCONFIRM/NOLOG
I knew the goddam lameness filter was going to interfere. I'm not shouting, it's the Vomit Making System!!!
I'm trying to calculate just how much Kool-Aid you have to drink until "the OS decided to reboot all on its own" becomes acceptable behavior.
Too funny.
Which distro are you using that isn't already infected by systemd? I'm SO glad Gentoo still allows me to use OpenRC...
What utter nonsense. You're saying that wealthy Republicans weren't allowed to contribute before Citizens? Or that organizational contributions in general weren't restricted/limited? In a word, bullshit. What Citizens allows is unlimited, anonymous contributions by corporations under the legal fiction that they (as artificial persons) have MORE freedom of speech than natural persons. If the difference between that and what we had before escapes you, then I suggest you invest in a 7th-grade civics class.
I guess you slept through that election if you think Romney outspent Obama.
You're forgetting about focus groups, which is where most politician's views/presentations are actually crafted. Polls are used as feedback for "how are we doing with 20 to 30 year-old Latino transvestites who self-identify as Republicans" to identify where (demographically) more advertising money needs to be spent.
Post Citizens United we're going to get the best government that money can buy.
Sorry, gotta disagree there. The "you typed it, you meant it" structure ADDS to the discussion. On "every comment other site" you see responses to comments that are NO LONGER as they were posted.
Random updates (downgrades) to the UI don't get you more readers (or clicks).
It's a small world after all
It's a small world after all
Oppose us and we will crush you
It's a small small small small world
So, a lot like their annual report, then?
Luckily, they don't make bubble memory anymore.
No, the "culprit" was admonished for shouting "You're lying" during a State Of The Union Address -- you know -- breaking decorum by acting like a drunken heckler at a comedy club.
Nope, just thanking you for paying attention and adding to the conversation.
I wish I'd said that - half an hour ago - in the post right above yours.
And that's when the prosecutor decides to do a half-assed job.
I think this case is a perfect example of the old saying that "a good prosecutor can get a Grand Jury to indict a ham sandwich".
Clearly, suggestions that she "should be taken out back and shot" or "fed into a wood chipper" are LITERAL threats that the posters are going to immediately drive cross country in a diaper to perform these acts. And statements like these clearly cross the line into "repugnant".
I seem to recall that the Framers Intent for free speech and freedom of the press were written by men who had actually *anonymously* printed TREASONOUS and SEDITIOUS pamphlets against their lawful government just a few years before.
Duke Nukem Forever!!!
Yeah, absolutely. If we're doing introductory inductees (say that 10 times fast) WoW doesn't really belong with Pong and Pac Man, especially in the abscence of Space Invaders and/or Galaga.