I'm not arguing that 10 years isn't excessive. However, in New York(where this happened) 2nd degree murder is 15-25 years. First degree is 20-life. Aggravated murder is life. So, murder is a longer sentence in this case. As for that 7 year average, I'm not going to do all the math. However, only 10 states have a minimum under 10 years. A couple of those, only with mitigating circumstances. Most of the rest have one that is a fair bit higher. Thus, the average should still be above 10 years for minimum sentencing. That doesn't even get into average sentencing.
Just isn't true. First, rates would just go up on them to compensate. If the rates were too high, they wouldn't operate. Second, to keep rates the same, the fatality rate would only have to be on par with our current modes of transportation.
The problem comes in that being Oscar nominated or winning an Oscar is marketable, to the actors in the movies and to the studios for new movies with those actors in it. If a director/actor/etc is given a choice, they would likely want the option to be able to earn an Oscar for their work when it's Oscar worthy work. Following that trail, it then becomes harder for Netflix to make quality movies with major names because the actors don't get their rightful acclaim for the work. At that point, the Academy is supporting traditional studios to the exclusion of potential competition.
It's not like what I'm saying is a guaranteed to happen or anything, but the fact that it can happen means it's at least a concern. And since the Academy is run by the studios, they have a vested interest to prevent outsiders from gaining traction. As such, it would potentially fall under the Sherman Act like the summary mentions.
I think it's less about that, and more liability for what they do/don't allow. If FB doesn't make the rules, they can't(or at least less likely to) be held liable for following them. And I'm not just talking legal liability, but in the eyes of the users.
Just to clarify, I believe they're only talking about authentication for creating an account. I'm not about to verify that, wouldn't shock me if it's true. However, there is most definitely email authentication to log into an account. As for the lack of features and general quality of it, it definitely doesn't compete. I wouldn't expect Epic to have every feature that Steam does coming out the gate, but it's like they didn't even try to make a competitive service.
First, you cannot have 100% failure rate when it still exists. Second, and more important, no system run to the exclusion of all else will succeed indefinitely.
First, they're bragging about raytracing at 4k@30fps. The Vega 56 pushes around 30-40fps at 4k, without raytracing, depending on the game.
Second, in terms of USD the Vega 56 is around $310, not $450. The PS4 Pro is $400. An entire computer, with the gpu, could be built for around $700-800. Best part, it can also be used to do every day computer things.
Third, the Vega 56 is 50%+ faster in terms of gpu performance than a PS4 Pro. You're basically getting a better gaming experience, plus computer, for twice the price.
I'm not saying PC gaming is for everyone. But, I personally would rather spend $800 on a PC over $500 on PC plus $400 on PS4 Pro. I'll admit I'm biased. I've owned a number of consoles, including PS4 Pro, but they've never been my primary gaming system. I've been building my own computers for 23 years.
While there is contention among language professionals, "comprised of" is considered standard English usage by multiple well regarded sources. Further, it is commonplace in both writing and speech. As the general public is the intended audience, and not just language professionals, it would be more accurate for them to use it as they have.
Not only that, but opinions aren't exactly universal. While some of the design would not be my first choice, it definitely is not ugly in my eyes. I would even bet some people truly like the way it looks.
You're an AC, so I didn't see the response and wouldn't be shocked if you don't see mine. To clarify, I'm one of the idiots that believes we have a choice in what we purchase. Volvo has intentionally cultivated safety as part of their image and design philosophy. They're being open and public about this decision. If you don't like their decision, buy from someone else or buy used. You're not exactly lacking in options.
In this hypothetical case you chose to purchase a car that was speed capped at 112mph. Why would you expect it to go any faster? It's no different than buying a car that isn't capable of going faster.
I could see how you feel about it as it's presented here. My opinion is that it's unethical to not ask the question. Everyone will have their own answer, or be unable to come to one. But, people should be asking themselves these questions.
I'm not sure what your initial intent was by saying reverse the question. At least, nothing came to mind that made any more sense than what I did. But, then.. this isn't just some easy question with an easy answer. It's also a deeper question than just "made in china". At what point are you(or are you no longer) ethically responsible for the supply chain of the products you purchase?
Indeed, but 4k is still a very small subset of gamers. You can easily game on half that price (or less) at 1080p. I know the choice to go 16gb vram was because the the manufacturing was already there for it, and not because they wanted to sell to the 4k crowd. But as you mentioned, the 1080ti is getting harder to find and the only real alternative is the 2080ti. It places the Radeon VII in a sweet spot for newer games at 4k, even at it's current price.
It definitely feels like a pseudo marketing campaign. But, there is still the very real fact that newer games are requiring more and more vram for 4k. 8gb isn't always enough. The obvious example would be The Division 2 recommending 11gbps of vram for 4k 60fps. 4k is still a small market, but it's growing.
I'm not saying the rules aren't different in your state. But, those rules are the federal guidelines. DOL site says that there are 7 states that require the regular minimum wage be paid, and then tips are on top of it. I don't fully trust my counting, but about 27 states have set a minimum wage for tipped employees that is higher than the federal minimum for them, but lower than the normal minimum. The rest follow federal guidelines.
Which is exactly how waitstaff are paid, as the AC mentioned. Instacart(restaurant) pays a minimum wage, Instacard(restaurant) then adds the earned tips, and then finally if that doesn't reach the floor(federal minimum wage) Instacart(restaurant) pays the difference.
Slashdot Mirror
I'm not arguing that 10 years isn't excessive. However, in New York(where this happened) 2nd degree murder is 15-25 years. First degree is 20-life. Aggravated murder is life. So, murder is a longer sentence in this case. As for that 7 year average, I'm not going to do all the math. However, only 10 states have a minimum under 10 years. A couple of those, only with mitigating circumstances. Most of the rest have one that is a fair bit higher. Thus, the average should still be above 10 years for minimum sentencing. That doesn't even get into average sentencing.
Just isn't true. First, rates would just go up on them to compensate. If the rates were too high, they wouldn't operate. Second, to keep rates the same, the fatality rate would only have to be on par with our current modes of transportation.
The problem comes in that being Oscar nominated or winning an Oscar is marketable, to the actors in the movies and to the studios for new movies with those actors in it. If a director/actor/etc is given a choice, they would likely want the option to be able to earn an Oscar for their work when it's Oscar worthy work. Following that trail, it then becomes harder for Netflix to make quality movies with major names because the actors don't get their rightful acclaim for the work. At that point, the Academy is supporting traditional studios to the exclusion of potential competition.
It's not like what I'm saying is a guaranteed to happen or anything, but the fact that it can happen means it's at least a concern. And since the Academy is run by the studios, they have a vested interest to prevent outsiders from gaining traction. As such, it would potentially fall under the Sherman Act like the summary mentions.
I think it's less about that, and more liability for what they do/don't allow. If FB doesn't make the rules, they can't(or at least less likely to) be held liable for following them. And I'm not just talking legal liability, but in the eyes of the users.
Just to clarify, I believe they're only talking about authentication for creating an account. I'm not about to verify that, wouldn't shock me if it's true. However, there is most definitely email authentication to log into an account. As for the lack of features and general quality of it, it definitely doesn't compete. I wouldn't expect Epic to have every feature that Steam does coming out the gate, but it's like they didn't even try to make a competitive service.
First, you cannot have 100% failure rate when it still exists. Second, and more important, no system run to the exclusion of all else will succeed indefinitely.
First, they're bragging about raytracing at 4k@30fps. The Vega 56 pushes around 30-40fps at 4k, without raytracing, depending on the game.
Second, in terms of USD the Vega 56 is around $310, not $450. The PS4 Pro is $400. An entire computer, with the gpu, could be built for around $700-800. Best part, it can also be used to do every day computer things.
Third, the Vega 56 is 50%+ faster in terms of gpu performance than a PS4 Pro. You're basically getting a better gaming experience, plus computer, for twice the price.
I'm not saying PC gaming is for everyone. But, I personally would rather spend $800 on a PC over $500 on PC plus $400 on PS4 Pro. I'll admit I'm biased. I've owned a number of consoles, including PS4 Pro, but they've never been my primary gaming system. I've been building my own computers for 23 years.
I work support for a local telecom. I had a customer call because she kept getting spam calls from her own number.
Someone is always paying for it. Just because there aren't any per minute charges, doesn't mean it doesn't get factored into the cost of the service.
While there is contention among language professionals, "comprised of" is considered standard English usage by multiple well regarded sources. Further, it is commonplace in both writing and speech. As the general public is the intended audience, and not just language professionals, it would be more accurate for them to use it as they have.
Not only that, but opinions aren't exactly universal. While some of the design would not be my first choice, it definitely is not ugly in my eyes. I would even bet some people truly like the way it looks.
You're an AC, so I didn't see the response and wouldn't be shocked if you don't see mine. To clarify, I'm one of the idiots that believes we have a choice in what we purchase. Volvo has intentionally cultivated safety as part of their image and design philosophy. They're being open and public about this decision. If you don't like their decision, buy from someone else or buy used. You're not exactly lacking in options.
In this hypothetical case you chose to purchase a car that was speed capped at 112mph. Why would you expect it to go any faster? It's no different than buying a car that isn't capable of going faster.
Because people like getting paid. Or at least, being able to provide for themselves and their families.
I dunno. 16% of adults(23% for 18-34) in the US doesn't seem like an insignificant number of users.
I could see how you feel about it as it's presented here. My opinion is that it's unethical to not ask the question. Everyone will have their own answer, or be unable to come to one. But, people should be asking themselves these questions.
The answer is that there isn't one. At least, not one universal answer.
I'm not sure what your initial intent was by saying reverse the question. At least, nothing came to mind that made any more sense than what I did. But, then.. this isn't just some easy question with an easy answer. It's also a deeper question than just "made in china". At what point are you(or are you no longer) ethically responsible for the supply chain of the products you purchase?
... for the answer.
?anihC nI edaM stcudorP scinortcelE esahcruP oT lacihtE tI sI
Doesn't seem to clear it up for me.
Minimum wage is far from a livable wage for a lot of people. I'm not saying it's too low everywhere, but it's definitely too low in places.
Indeed, but 4k is still a very small subset of gamers. You can easily game on half that price (or less) at 1080p. I know the choice to go 16gb vram was because the the manufacturing was already there for it, and not because they wanted to sell to the 4k crowd. But as you mentioned, the 1080ti is getting harder to find and the only real alternative is the 2080ti. It places the Radeon VII in a sweet spot for newer games at 4k, even at it's current price.
It definitely feels like a pseudo marketing campaign. But, there is still the very real fact that newer games are requiring more and more vram for 4k. 8gb isn't always enough. The obvious example would be The Division 2 recommending 11gbps of vram for 4k 60fps. 4k is still a small market, but it's growing.
I'm not saying the rules aren't different in your state. But, those rules are the federal guidelines. DOL site says that there are 7 states that require the regular minimum wage be paid, and then tips are on top of it. I don't fully trust my counting, but about 27 states have set a minimum wage for tipped employees that is higher than the federal minimum for them, but lower than the normal minimum. The rest follow federal guidelines.
Which is exactly how waitstaff are paid, as the AC mentioned. Instacart(restaurant) pays a minimum wage, Instacard(restaurant) then adds the earned tips, and then finally if that doesn't reach the floor(federal minimum wage) Instacart(restaurant) pays the difference.
You still need to come up with the right "tobacco pipe" reason to sell the kits legally.