Slashdot Mirror
Mark Zuckerberg Wants The Government To Help Police Internet Content (bbc.com)
"Mark Zuckerberg says regulators and governments should play a more active role in controlling internet content," according to the BBC, calling for new laws governing harmful content, election integrity, privacy, and data portability.
An anonymous reader quotes their report: In an op-ed published in the Washington Post, Facebook's chief says the responsibility for monitoring harmful content is too great for firms alone... "Lawmakers often tell me we have too much power over speech, and frankly I agree," Mr Zuckerberg writes... In brief, Mr Zuckerberg calls for the following things:
- Common rules that all social media sites need to adhere to, enforced by third-party bodies, to control the spread of harmful content
- All major tech companies to release a transparency report every three months, to put it on a par with financial reporting
- Stronger laws around the world to protect the integrity of elections, with common standards for all websites to identify political actors
- Laws that not only apply to candidates and elections, but also other "divisive political issues", and for laws to apply outside of official campaign periods
- New industry-wide standards to control how political campaigns use data to target voters online
- More countries to adopt privacy laws like the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which came into force last year
- A "common global framework" that means these laws are all standardised globally, rather than being substantially different from country to country
- Clear rules about who's responsible for protecting people's data when they move it from one service to another
Zuckerberg believes the same regulations should apply to all web sites to make it easier to stop the spread of "harmful content." He also says Facebook will be creating "an independent body so people can appeal our decisions" when content is taken.
An anonymous reader quotes their report: In an op-ed published in the Washington Post, Facebook's chief says the responsibility for monitoring harmful content is too great for firms alone... "Lawmakers often tell me we have too much power over speech, and frankly I agree," Mr Zuckerberg writes... In brief, Mr Zuckerberg calls for the following things:
- Common rules that all social media sites need to adhere to, enforced by third-party bodies, to control the spread of harmful content
- All major tech companies to release a transparency report every three months, to put it on a par with financial reporting
- Stronger laws around the world to protect the integrity of elections, with common standards for all websites to identify political actors
- Laws that not only apply to candidates and elections, but also other "divisive political issues", and for laws to apply outside of official campaign periods
- New industry-wide standards to control how political campaigns use data to target voters online
- More countries to adopt privacy laws like the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which came into force last year
- A "common global framework" that means these laws are all standardised globally, rather than being substantially different from country to country
- Clear rules about who's responsible for protecting people's data when they move it from one service to another
Zuckerberg believes the same regulations should apply to all web sites to make it easier to stop the spread of "harmful content." He also says Facebook will be creating "an independent body so people can appeal our decisions" when content is taken.
I thought the idea was that information wants to be free, and we shouldn't restrict content (unless it's clearly illegal, like child porn). Even if it's content you don't agree with...
Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
Does this man really want to turn this country into Mao Zedong's China?
Zuckerberg calling government for help? He must fear a FTC investigation.
Common rules that all social media sites need to adhere to, enforced by third-party bodies, to control the spread of harmful content
A "common global framework" that means these laws are all standardised globally, rather than being substantially different from country to country
Nah, go eat a dick.
Clean up your own shit, Fuckerberg. Your ad network is full of garbage because you have decided not to spend the money that it takes to keep it not shit-filled.
Unfortunately for the rest of us, the truth is that your business model doesn't work if you have to pay humans to moderate content. But, don't worry. In the US, you can continue to buy Congresspeople, and the rest of us non-billionaires just have to eat shit. You'll be fine.
I don't respond to AC's.
sounds more like he is trying to save money and get the government to foot the bill for moderating his and others websites.
Mark Zuckerberg is THE biggest threat to the internet that the world has ever seen.
Mark Zuckerberg is a threat to everything the internet was. He's a threat to openness, freedom, end user control, and privacy.
He's a threat to our societies outside the internet, too. His power grab is making ripples in a much bigger pond.
Some people even think he is a threat to the very idea of independent thought.
The previous Net Neutrality policy and the proposed Net Neutrality legislation pretty much sets the stage for government to do this kind of thing.
Zuckerberg is the typical tool who calls upon the government to bail him out of a problem he can't solve himself. Maybe he should check from the original Facebook authors he stole the code from maybe they have ideas he cant seem to come up with. Better yet lets close down Facebook. Its not the internet that is the problem is the CEO's with no technical aptitude that need to go.
Sherman FTW of all mankind
One of these things, is not like the other...
Looks like FB usefulness, for whatever that was, has officially past its mark. Again!
Tell me again why a social media platform, who makes money hand over fist, needs the... Government to help it out?
He really does just give reason after reason for people to leave that platform doesn't he...
Screw You Mark - take RESPONSIBILITY
I think he just wants the .gov to take the heavy lifting while he take the PROFITS. No I say. Let the White Right blab hate and take the consequences. The .gov's responsibility is to thump you when you put profits over oversight. Your platform, your responsibility.
the 1st amendment will make it hard / end up with long list of court cases.
There have long been laws against certain things like child porn, plagiarism, and defamation. There is a democratic process for drawing these boundaries, and a formal justice system for interpreting and enforcing them. When policing speech is delegated to universities, private companies, etc. they can draw the boundaries a lot tighter, and enforce them arbitrarily. We'd be better off if Facebook, youtube etc acted as common carriers more or less.
He knows the government is about to come down hard on Facebook, which would put them at a competitive disadvantage vs other advertising-based giants like Google, so rather than take that hit alone he wants everyone to suffer the same fate so they don't gain any advantage on him.
He's also a big believer in disarming the public. The ultimate Nazi of the new world order.
Common rules: Set by Germany over history? Spain over Catalonia? Communist China over the real China Taiwan? The UK over word use online?
Release a transparency report: The EU can show who got reported and removed. How many internet users are getting interviewed by police about their use of words online. What new tax was paid on every internet link in the EU.
Stronger laws around the world to protect the integrity of elections. Support one side of politics. Talk about any other politics and get removed and reported.
Laws to apply outside of official campaign periods. The freedom to support one side of politics before and after any approved election.
New industry-wide standards. No freedom of speech. No freedom after speech. Blasphemy laws can be used globally.
More countries to adopt privacy laws like the European Union. A EU link tax and more EU censorship.
A "common global framework". Censorship.
Clear rules about who's responsible for protecting people's data. Ad brands get to have their approved ads track users globally. No ad blocking software.
All enforced by NGO's, political parties, theocracies, ad brands, police, think tanks, the EU, social media brands and mil govs.
Freedom of speech and freedom after speech is looking great again.
Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
We have free speech, so as long as his company is based in the US no government has the right to "police content," even on his shit-tier platform.
Everyone who posts anything on FB is contributing content for which FB profits from. Everyone who publishes content should be paid.
Fuckerberg wants the government to police social media..., and âoenewsâ sites report this jackasses opinion as if it is news.
Who needs policing? How about Fuckerberg?
Do people not remember seeing him and his Silicon Valley buddies protesting against having to respect users rights to privacy, marching through Cupertino chanting... NO MEANS YES, YES MEANS ANALYTICS!
LOL
When you can no longer share freely on centralized systems.
Money is what this is about.
Zuck's comments can be boiled down to: It costs us too much money to maintain a hoard of people and machines to monitor the content on our sites. We want the government to take over that expense to both lay it at the feet of the taxpayer and take over the bad PR censoring and making decisions on content gets us.
Zuckerberg wants to retain all the benefits ( data mining ) that Facebook currently enjoys with the people that are connected via his platform.
However, he wants to dump the responsibilities for moderating said platform on anyone but Facebook.
This way, if $objectionable_item_of_the_month is found on Facebook, it's not Facebook's fault.
Requires a lot of time, effort and money to police your own systems when they get this big. Especially when you start taking
into account that different countries have different laws / rules you must adhere to if you want to keep a presence there.
The bigger a company is, the more easily it can withstand regulatory compliance costs, while its smaller competitors will go out of business or get bought out by larger ones. There are countless examples in history. It's about money, pure and simple.
Force people to select the people they want to see their messages. (Think reply all in emails)
For all messages that go âpublicâ(TM), hold them till reviewed by a human.
Oh - you canâ(TM)t make obscene profits any more? Cry me a river.
Hehehe look at Chaime KIKE censoring fact JEWS themselves put out from their own history and book of law the talmud: Hide it! Can't let goy non-jews know we want to BROWN THEM OUT
Sounds like Zuck want to take the easy way out. Have the government set the rules, so when Facebook fails again and again, he can fall back on, "But in every case we followed the letter of the regulation" and it is all no longer his problem, and he can keep raking in profit while taking no responsibility at all for the consequences of his creation.
Data wants to be free. It told me so.
Khazar Talmudic Jews believe this of all they call goyim/gentiles (any non-jew): Jews = biggest racists of all for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Peron, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No. Driven into DESERTS ages ago! Don't wonder why after all those exilings above.
Should anyone doubt any of this see Jacob Javits' crony Rosenthal spill the beans on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI/ where he called all Christianity fools for helping Israel and the biggest scam of all time per their beliefs below from their Talmud.
This is the province of the synagogue of Satan (Pharisees whom Jesus Christ himself kicked to the curb out of the temple & they killed him for it. Jeremiah did the same to them also + the Essenes could not stand them either breaking away from the pharisee corruption):
Jew Talmud excerpts (the book that calls Christ's mother a whore & a bastard of a roman soldier):
1. Sanhedrin 59a: "Murdering Goyim is like killing a wild animal."
2. Abodah Zara 26b: "Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed."
3. Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."
4. Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."
5. Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."
6. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."
7. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim."
8. Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."
9. Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."
10. Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them."
11. Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts."
12. Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."
13. Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."
14. Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated."
15. Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl."
16. Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible."
17. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."
18. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples."
19. Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy."
20. Seph. Jp., 92, 1: "God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations."
21. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen H
- Stronger laws around the world to protect the integrity of elections, with common standards for all websites to identify political actors
Precisely how could laws protect the integrity of elections? What integrity? Do you mean integrity as in no invalid votes casted (or a sufficiently low quantity that they can't have any kind of measurable effect)? Do you mean integrity as in everyone gets the vote they put into the system? Do you mean integrity as in everybody is on the ballot? Do you mean integrity as in districting is fair? Do you mean integrity as in the result represents the will of the majority? Do you mean integrity as in the only influence that should be exerted is domestic influence?
There are a lot of different things that might contribute to the "integrity" of an election. The way this is written makes it sound like there's a result of an election and the wrong one has happened and so the correct result needs to be arrived at in the future. This is authoritarian horseshit.
If you want to talk about the integrity of the actual votes, your #1 target should be Diebold or whatever its name is now, not Facebook. There's no reason why the hardware used to do voting or the process should be private and not auditable. We need to go back to having some kind of paper voting, whether that's an auditable paper that a machine produces or straight up written votes. Technology can too easily be attacked and the attacks would allow very fast and widespread corruption of the process if applied. I agree wholeheartedly in this type of election integrity and think it's immensely important for the system to have the guarantees of paper.
If you want to talk about districting, more than D or R being on the ballot, proportional representation, or the electoral system being direct democracy, those are fair conversations to have, but Facebook has nothing to do with any.
If you want to talk about influence, you're throwing stones in glass houses, first off. The United States is the #1 meddler in the affairs of other countries (which is essentially incontrovertible regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the meddling). If it's wrong for other countries to do it, why isn't it wrong for us to do it? I'm personally of the opinion that we shouldn't be doing it or at least certainly not so broadly and we should accept that it will be attempted on us. It's our responsibility as individuals to deal with that possibility. I don't have to reconcile my opinions with what I think should happen because there's no incongruity. The person that would espouse the line above does need to reconcile those things.
Secondly, how would you attempt to categorize influence? Honestly, there are prominent ideologies right now that will claim that everything is political. Which means in their belief system, literally everything is the result of influence. Is somebody talking on the news without strictly dry facts over in Spain going to run afoul of these laws and get arrested if they visit? Extradited if they do it on social media? They have an opinion and as a result of engaging the public, are legitimately performing a function of influence. The problem is not that this canard of "fake news" exists, it's that some people - and I would argue few enough that it's probably not actually a significant problem - accept it at face value and that's that. Some people take The Onion as a real outlet. They (at least historically, I haven't read in a spell) make no attempt to indicate that they're not a real outlet. Whatever your definition of "fake news," The Onion would fall under it.
You can't stop that and these people have a vote. You can't stop them from having a vote. Attacking this problem from the government or institutional level is authoritarian horseshit. It must be the individual's responsibility to sort through the information and make their own decisions. This is not negotiable. If you get to make decisions about what these people can and can't see or make judgments about ho
"Sure fine. Pay up some taxes Zuckie dear." Not 2% either.... and the whole decade+ of backtaxes too!
Google, Facebook, etc have turned the world into an ungovernable mess, and now throw up their hands (while pocketing billions of dollars) and ask for "help with regulation." What to do, oh what to do?
Ever appropriate prescriptive captcha: oblivion
Government(s): "Fix it so it's better!"
Mark: "What would you like it to look like?"
Governments: "We don't know! You decide! But we'll know it if we see it, and will punish you if we don't like it!" ...He's just asking for the kind of regulatory oversight that most communications businesses eventually receive.
I don't do Facebook and I wish it would go away. But he's not wrong here.
Khazar Talmudic Jews believe this of all they call goyim/gentiles (any non-jew): Jews = biggest racists of all for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Peron, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No. Driven into DESERTS ages ago! Don't wonder why after all those exilings above.
Should anyone doubt any of this see Jacob Javits' crony Rosenthal spill the beans on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI/ where he called all Christianity fools for helping Israel and the biggest scam of all time per their beliefs below from their Talmud.
This is the province of the synagogue of Satan (Pharisees whom Jesus Christ himself kicked to the curb out of the temple & they killed him for it. Jeremiah did the same to them also + the Essenes could not stand them either breaking away from the pharisee corruption):
Jew Talmud excerpts (the book that calls Christ's mother a whore & a bastard of a roman soldier):
1. Sanhedrin 59a: "Murdering Goyim is like killing a wild animal."
2. Abodah Zara 26b: "Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed."
3. Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."
4. Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."
5. Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."
6. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."
7. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim."
8. Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."
9. Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."
10. Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them."
11. Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts."
12. Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."
13. Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."
14. Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated."
15. Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl."
16. Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible."
17. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."
18. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples."
19. Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy."
20. Seph. Jp., 92, 1: "God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations."
21. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen H
"Dumb fucks"
Like any good "liberal", Zuck want the government to pay for the problem he's created.
"National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
Khazar Talmudic Jews believe this of all they call goyim/gentiles (any non-jew): Jews = biggest racists of all for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Peron, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No. Driven into DESERTS ages ago! Don't wonder why after all those exilings above.
Should anyone doubt any of this see Jacob Javits' crony Rosenthal spill the beans on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI/ where he called all Christianity fools for helping Israel and the biggest scam of all time per their beliefs below from their Talmud.
This is the province of the synagogue of Satan (Pharisees whom Jesus Christ himself kicked to the curb out of the temple & they killed him for it. Jeremiah did the same to them also + the Essenes could not stand them either breaking away from the pharisee corruption):
Jew Talmud excerpts (the book that calls Christ's mother a whore & a bastard of a roman soldier):
1. Sanhedrin 59a: "Murdering Goyim is like killing a wild animal."
2. Abodah Zara 26b: "Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed."
3. Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."
4. Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."
5. Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."
6. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."
7. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim."
8. Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."
9. Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."
10. Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them."
11. Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts."
12. Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."
13. Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."
14. Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated."
15. Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl."
16. Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible."
17. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."
18. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples."
19. Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy."
20. Seph. Jp., 92, 1: "God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations."
21. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen H
Hehehe look at Chaime KIKE censoring fact JEWS themselves put out from their own history and book of law the talmud: Hide it! Can't let goy non-jews know we want to BROWN THEM OUT!
That way, he doesn't have to pay for any of it and totally absolved of any responsibility.
how about we just legally recognize social networks 8n the same manner we recognize other subversive addictions. like we do with the feedback cycle of an abusive relationship, or a crack addiction, and remove any legitamite commercial ave. if people want a sociAl neyworks, they better not involve money. lets push them to the dark web and out of casual influence in pop culture.
Khazar Talmudic Jews believe this of all they call goyim/gentiles (any non-jew): Jews = biggest racists of all for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Peron, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No. Driven into DESERTS ages ago! Don't wonder why after all those exilings above.
Should anyone doubt any of this see Jacob Javits' crony Rosenthal spill the beans on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI/ where he called all Christianity fools for helping Israel and the biggest scam of all time per their beliefs below from their Talmud.
This is the province of the synagogue of Satan (Pharisees whom Jesus Christ himself kicked to the curb out of the temple & they killed him for it. Jeremiah did the same to them also + the Essenes could not stand them either breaking away from the pharisee corruption):
Jew Talmud excerpts (the book that calls Christ's mother a whore & a bastard of a roman soldier):
1. Sanhedrin 59a: "Murdering Goyim is like killing a wild animal."
2. Abodah Zara 26b: "Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed."
3. Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."
4. Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."
5. Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."
6. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."
7. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim."
8. Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."
9. Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."
10. Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them."
11. Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts."
12. Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."
13. Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."
14. Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated."
15. Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl."
16. Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible."
17. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."
18. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples."
19. Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy."
20. Seph. Jp., 92, 1: "God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations."
21. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen H
- Common rules that all social media sites need to adhere to, enforced by third-party bodies, to control the spread of harmful content
- All major tech companies to release a transparency report every three months, to put it on a par with financial reporting
- Stronger laws around the world to protect the integrity of elections, with common standards for all websites to identify political actors
- Laws that not only apply to candidates and elections, but also other "divisive political issues", and for laws to apply outside of official campaign periods
- New industry-wide standards to control how political campaigns use data to target voters online
- More countries to adopt privacy laws like the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which came into force last year
- A "common global framework" that means these laws are all standardised globally, rather than being substantially different from country to country
- Clear rules about who's responsible for protecting people's data when they move it from one service to another
MZ isn't the only one ideas.
- Mercilessly berate anyone and everyone still using Facebook
- Block ALL Facebooks domains and networks on systems and networks you manage.
- Lodge complaints with all public facing companies still advertising on Facebook
- Shit post content on Facebook critical of each and every advertiser
- File lawsuits against every website on the planet using Facebook tracking bugs
- Launch Ad campaigns critical of Facebook
- Rigorous campaign of publically shaming employees of Facebook
- Contact your gov representatives to express concern for Facebook on privacy and anti-trust grounds.
- Troll MZ anywhere he makes a public appearance.
- Large scale persistent protests on and around 1-hacker way
These globalists must be stopped.
Exactly. Facebook and others who support a wide range of views (unlike a single topic forum, or something like that) should just accept that some people will be offended some of the time. They should block illegal stuff and and leave everything else alone as a platform.
At the same time, they can still create easy ways for people to voluntarily restrict what they see. If you don't want anything from group X, or about topic Y, then make it easy if that shows up to just block it from your feed so it no longer exists for you.
Yeah, they'll get accused of "supporting" Z when really they're just tolerating Z, just like they tolerate everything else, but going beyond that to pick sides in cultural wars and the like doesn't end well. There is a bright line of legal/illegal, stick to that and tell the people who complain how to block it for themselves.
The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
i must agree the average police department station has a terrible internet presence; i cant txt to dispatch, cant sms gateway to a field officer to coordinate with my failed drug exchange. their website is written in what, pdf2html CGI? Police traffic on theirvwebsite may as well be autogen by a bipolar man schizzofrennic monkey err MCSE College student loan defaulted dropout.
Why cant slashdot bury this shit its really long horrible and hard to scroll past on a phone.
It's much easier for Facebook to be able to treat the entire world the same way. That shows him as another filthy megalomaniac globalist. Countries still exist, the want to determine their own course, fuck Zuckerberg and anyone that tries to stand in the way of free speech and personal liberty.
Big business loves regulation. They can afford whole departments to comply with it, but small upstart competitors can't.
Zuckerberg is right. The government ought to regulate the Internet, starting with an anti-trust breakup of the Facebook monopoly.
Beg to HIDE\DELETE\CENSOR (like Suckerberg) fact you don't and can't deny in the jew tradition of lies noted from your talmud in that post? Jew you're undone.
Why doesn't rich boy hire editors and filter out dubious content himself? Oh right, that would cost him money.
They've seen the winds are blowing and are trying to manipulate it so that they are the governments "partner". Why? Because governments have demonstrated time and again that they view "privacy" as something that applies to the private sector, not to government agencies. They feel it's their right (and duty honestly) to be able to know anything and everything you do online (yes, they propose "safeguards" but those are always controlled by the same government, which means they're speed bumps at most).
An ideal situation for Facebook is having governments:
1. Tell Facebook they have to log anything and everything.
2. Tell Facebook they can't disclose what they log because "National Security".
Facebook would of course b*tch and moan an appropriate amount when being "forced" into this, only to laugh their asses off when they were back in the office.
...or even better a third party authorized by the government.
And, exactly, who will decide what "harmful content" is. Perhaps Trump? Perhaps AOC? Perhaps Sanders? Perhaps ISIS?
Zuckerberg, go read the First Amendment - no, go ahead, I'll wait. There are no big words in it so you should be able to understand it eventually. Okay read it again. And, one more time, Very. Slowly. This. Time.
Okay, now, did you notice the "abridge the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press" part?
And, don't forget, some people think Facebook itself is "harmful".
See above.
Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading
Was having a conversation at work and we were talking about fake news and misinformation in general being harmful to people. I expressed my concern at the idea of, and my surprise people weren't talking about it already, misinformation becoming a crime and it becoming a slippery slope to the end of freedom of speech. This sounds like the first step in that direction thanks to Mr. Fuckerberg and his creation.
Chewbacon
The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
We should let President Trump decide what is allowed on sites like Facebook and Slashdot. That way there's no more "enemy of the people." He knows what's best for us.
Most of this trouble started when YOU started policing the Internet. And doing it badly.
Please stop censoring your users when they offend you or the people you are allied with Leave it I
I know you want the 'government' to 'help' police the Internet. But the Internet does not need policing, nor is it you or people like you who would be trustworthy policers of the Internet, or anything else. While you should not be trusted even with your own corporation and its platforms, they are yours to do with as you wish. Leave others alone, and do not harm those not yours.
This will not go well for you or us if you persist.
deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
Please don't misquote the Talmud.
How about some new laws restricting government expansionism?
*Holds breath*
Requiem for the American Dream
The problem is that content that people "don't agree with" is now what many consider restrictable, banable, equivalent to violence (or in their mind "actually" violence). The reaction to "offensive speech" is no longer to mock and ignore the speaker, it is now to silence the speaker (including the use of threats and force).
I'm not sure we can count on a modern interpretation of "clearly illegal".
Actually we have good policy for what should be banned, a tangible and realistic threat of violence.
I am not a lawyer but my recollection from some readings I did a few years ago is that the US Supreme Court ruled that speech that tangibly threatens or incites violence can be banned. It all depends on the context of the speech not the words themselves, the context must include a tangible and realistic fear of violence. A satirical or rhetorical or similar threat would not be banned.
Similarly having your feelings greatly hurt, your inner self denied or dismissed, etc would not count as violence no matter how much "pain" you feel.
He doesn't want the government to take over that expense.
He wants regulation so that everyone has the same expense. There's also the problem that he gets attacked for speech reasons if he does it voluntarily. If the government mandates it and facebook does it, you can no longer blame facebook.
More like, Zuck is trying to regulate his competition to death, while also absolving himself from the shit that's going on on his platform. This strategy worked for many a megacorp. Megacrops can afford the costs of compliance. Smaller companies can't.
The banks must issue a Rules for Monopolists policy book when you deposit your second billion. All I got was a lunch with Peter Lynch.
No wonder these shits love China so much. They see it as a model.
Duh
Well, it's a puerile response from me, and just what the hell is "harmful content", anyway? Smells like leftist claptrap to me. Oh boy, let's make it criminal to hurt your precious little darling feelings. And thus, Free Speech is dead.
Ruby Neural Evolution of Augmenting Topologies
at first glance, shifting the blame of ones actions of self-governance is not a good idea. government is to manage and regulate good public policy. the FB TOS basically says, we are a public bulletin board. you put up a note and the public is free to read it, copy and paste it, do whatever. if you put another sticky over your note that says, for my friends only instead of public, then that means for their friends only (except we at Facebook can look at it too to determine if we should allow it and of course digest it and disseminate however we feel froggy). good stuff. here is my recipe for chocolate chip cookies i bought for 25 with a coupon from inside a box of cereal.
When the early entrants into any marke achieve market dominance, and then see they are no longer abler to achieve high growth, generally due to market saturation and dominance, they invite big government into the market to heavily regulate it, effectively raising a drawbridge of paperwork and legal fees blocking any smaller, leaner, more innovative upstarts to arise and compete against them.
Facebook: Welcom to the Boeing, Airbus, Honeywell, GE, LockheedMartin, etc club of ossified monster companies with no fear of new competitors and no prospects for future dynamism.
A cannot, for the life of me, understand why ANYBODY with a brain has a facebook page, with the exception of businesses and politicians who's "experts" advice this to be necessary (advice that would dissappear if everybody else was off).
Zuckerberg needs to shut the fuck up.
Lol, oh noes! You caught us! We Jews have been p,toying the take over of Hollywood and the banks since we got kicked out of Egypt thousands of years ago! But! Since you have revealed our nefarious plot on /. we will have to move our timeline up a thousand years! We tried to get rid of Trump, the anti-Jew, with a fake report leading to the fake investigation, reported on by Jew owned fake cnn but were thwarted by anti-Jew Trunp!
He created this monster and now he's losing control of it rapidly, he has finally admitted he doesn't know how and needs help. Zuck has always looked like a lost little kid, he's still got that college kid mentality and he's needed to grow up for quite some time. I'd like to think he's finally admitted his "monster" is out of control but I think it's a case that if the Govs around the world help him, then they can share the blame and take some of the heat off him.
Sorry Zuck, we simply don't trust you, take your billions and go away please before you do any more damage to humanity.
He did this to pit politicians against each other. All of the "one world standard" part is to protect himself from being jailed in australia.
F*ck off
in any case working for the elites agenda. The one that states only the rich are allowed to survive.
You can't be a common carrier "more or less". Either you are, or you aren't.
Facebook isn't. Its business model depends on making value judgements about the content people post. It's a publisher, simple as that.
It still amazes me how people don't see that.
Is he ? Because he knows his demon can"t be stopped in doing what it wants.
if they leave the policing of content to authorities, that only illegal stuff is removed, and whatever local rules they made up themselves no longer matter, e.g. suddenly naked skin is OK?
Mark Zuckerbeg really wants the government to construct a moat around his business to make sure that other companies will find it difficult to break his stranglehold over social networking.
why not have facebook in charge of internet censorship? microsoft is already part of law enforcement, taking down web sites and policing the internet...
Rich people think they own the Internet.
Nothing is misquoted. Cut your crap JEW.
Khazar Talmudic Jews believe this of all they call goyim/gentiles (any non-jew): Jews = biggest racists of all for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Peron, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No. Driven into DESERTS ages ago! Don't wonder why after all those exilings above.
Should anyone doubt any of this see Jacob Javits' crony Rosenthal spill the beans on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI/ where he called all Christianity fools for helping Israel and the biggest scam of all time per their beliefs below from their Talmud.
This is the province of the synagogue of Satan (Pharisees whom Jesus Christ himself kicked to the curb out of the temple & they killed him for it. Jeremiah did the same to them also + the Essenes could not stand them either breaking away from the pharisee corruption):
Jew Talmud excerpts (the book that calls Christ's mother a whore & a bastard of a roman soldier):
1. Sanhedrin 59a: "Murdering Goyim is like killing a wild animal."
2. Abodah Zara 26b: "Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed."
3. Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."
4. Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."
5. Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."
6. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."
7. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim."
8. Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."
9. Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."
10. Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them."
11. Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts."
12. Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."
13. Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."
14. Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated."
15. Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl."
16. Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible."
17. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."
18. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples."
19. Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy."
20. Seph. Jp., 92, 1: "God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations."
21. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen H
Khazar Talmudic Jews believe this of all they call goyim/gentiles (any non-jew): Jews = biggest racists of all for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Peron, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No. Driven into DESERTS ages ago! Don't wonder why after all those exilings above.
Should anyone doubt any of this see Jacob Javits' crony Rosenthal spill the beans on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI/ where he called all Christianity fools for helping Israel and the biggest scam of all time per their beliefs below from their Talmud.
This is the province of the synagogue of Satan (Pharisees whom Jesus Christ himself kicked to the curb out of the temple & they killed him for it. Jeremiah did the same to them also + the Essenes could not stand them either breaking away from the pharisee corruption):
Jew Talmud excerpts (the book that calls Christ's mother a whore & a bastard of a roman soldier):
Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."
Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."
Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."
Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."
Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim."
Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."
Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."
Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them."
Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts."
Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."
Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."
Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated."
Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl."
Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible."
Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."
Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples."
Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy."
Seph. Jp., 92, 1: "God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations."
Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 156: "When a Jew has a Gentile in his clutches, another Jew may go to the same Gentile, lend him money and in turn deceive him, so that the Gentile shall be ruined. For the property of a Gentile, according to
Khazar Talmudic Jews believe this of all they call goyim/gentiles (any non-jew): Jews = biggest racists of all for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Peron, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No. Driven into DESERTS ages ago! Don't wonder why after all those exilings above.
Should anyone doubt any of this see Jacob Javits' crony Rosenthal spill the beans on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI/ where he called all Christianity fools for helping Israel and the biggest scam of all time per their beliefs below from their Talmud.
This is the province of the synagogue of Satan (Pharisees whom Jesus Christ himself kicked to the curb out of the temple & they killed him for it. Jeremiah did the same to them also + the Essenes could not stand them either breaking away from the pharisee corruption):
Jew Talmud excerpts (the book that calls Christ's mother a whore & a bastard of a roman soldier):
Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."
Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."
Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."
Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."
Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim."
Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."
Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."
Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them."
Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts."
Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."
Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."
Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated."
Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl."
Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible."
Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."
Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples."
Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy."
Seph. Jp., 92, 1: "God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations."
Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 156: "When a Jew has a Gentile in his clutches, another Jew may go to the same Gentile, lend him money and in turn deceive him, so that the Gentile shall be ruined. For the property of a Gentile, according to
Khazar Talmudic Jews believe this of all they call goyim/gentiles (any non-jew): Jews = biggest racists of all for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Peron, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No. Driven into DESERTS ages ago! Don't wonder why after all those exilings above.
Should anyone doubt any of this see Jacob Javits' crony Rosenthal spill the beans on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI/ where he called all Christianity fools for helping Israel and the biggest scam of all time per their beliefs below from their Talmud.
This is the province of the synagogue of Satan (Pharisees whom Jesus Christ himself kicked to the curb out of the temple & they killed him for it. Jeremiah did the same to them also + the Essenes could not stand them either breaking away from the pharisee corruption):
Jew Talmud excerpts (the book that calls Christ's mother a whore & a bastard of a roman soldier):
Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."
Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."
Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."
Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."
Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim."
Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."
Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."
Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them."
Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts."
Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."
Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."
Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated."
Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl."
Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible."
Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."
Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples."
Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy."
Seph. Jp., 92, 1: "God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations."
Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 156: "When a Jew has a Gentile in his clutches, another Jew may go to the same Gentile, lend him money and in turn deceive him, so that the Gentile shall be ruined. For the property of a Gentile, according to
Khazar Talmudic Jews believe this of all they call goyim/gentiles (any non-jew): Jews = biggest racists of all for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Peron, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No. Driven into DESERTS ages ago! Don't wonder why after all those exilings above.
Should anyone doubt any of this see Jacob Javits' crony Rosenthal spill the beans on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI/ where he called all Christianity fools for helping Israel and the biggest scam of all time per their beliefs below from their Talmud.
This is the province of the synagogue of Satan (Pharisees whom Jesus Christ himself kicked to the curb out of the temple & they killed him for it. Jeremiah did the same to them also + the Essenes could not stand them either breaking away from the pharisee corruption):
Jew Talmud excerpts (the book that calls Christ's mother a whore & a bastard of a roman soldier):
Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."
Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."
Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."
Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."
Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim."
Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."
Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."
Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them."
Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts."
Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."
Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."
Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated."
Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl."
Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible."
Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."
Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples."
Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy."
Seph. Jp., 92, 1: "God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations."
Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 156: "When a Jew has a Gentile in his clutches, another Jew may go to the same Gentile, lend him money and in turn deceive him, so that the Gentile shall be ruined. For the property of a Gentile, according to
Fucking die already, nobody is reading your shit
I'm not going to change what I'm doing, so let's cut a deal so that it looks like *you* are. What a slime ball, and apparently he's forgotten that these are the people he lied to under oath. Fuck Zuck. I dearly hope they start locking these tech clowns up overseas.
It would be a First Amendment violation or a government to get involved in policing Facebook as Zuckerberg wants to. Zuck exerts fine-grained control over the politics allowed on his platform with such actions as banning white separatist posting while allowing black separatist posts. Governments would Constitutionally be limited to policing the small number of specific First Amendment exceptions that have been judicially established over the years:
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/9...
So facebook's business model is being the thought police? That's fucking retarded.
Why dont you keep doing everything you can to avoid paying taxes.. while asking the government to do more for you?
That isnâ(TM)t what he said. Facebook will decide what is best for its business by making judgements about what it allows to be published on its product and how they affect its ability to run its business. This can be guided by government regulations and public opinion. Do keep up.
Q: How do you know when Mark Zuckerberg is lying?
A: When his lips are moving.
he literally said
Facebook isn't. Its business model depends on making value judgements about the content people post.
Thats "Thought police"
No, itâ(TM)s a private service. I donâ(TM)t think you can think critically. I can see why you think youâ(TM)re a victim and challenge people to fights on the internet.
Youâ(TM)d be fired in two seconds if you were CEO and there was huge public outcry and your stock and public image were faltering you stood your ground going âoeno, that means we are the thought police! Your stockholders would say, were a publisher and your killing revenue!
%#$@er
Looks like he's a Democrat all right. He'll want to start burning books next.
How about this;
Don't moderate!
Internet is for 14 year-olds and older. .. Parent.
your child - your problem & responsibility to
If a company is not a #Publisher,
they can not Censor - unless illegal in the USA.
What the F is wrong with U people? Really, U power grasping evil.
https://twitter.com/StevWork/s...
He wants governments to help create a Monopoly.
most of his proposals he can just implement on facebook if he wants to, there is nobody saying that he can't.
his proposals, his own social network, he doesn't need to wait for same laws to come into effect.
On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
"- Stronger laws around the world to protect the integrity of elections, with common standards for all websites to identify political actors"
Yes and you know who's sure to follow these laws... government agencies!
There have long been laws against certain things like child porn, plagiarism, and defamation.
One of these things is not like the other. Can you guess which one it is?
Child porn. Pictures of naked children, even in suggestive poses, was perfectly legal when I was a child.
So no, not all of those have been illegal for a long time. Can you identify *WHY* the ban on child porn is so recent?
Because, constitutionally, there is no basis for making it illegal and it is a direct infringement on the First Amendment.
Go ahead, I will give you time. Think of *ANY* reason child porn should be illegal other than it is detestable. I can help a little with this...
In order for child porn to be created, a child has to have something illegal done to them.
Well, yeah, but I can go on the Internet right now and find a video documenting a person being carved into smaller and smaller pieces until that person is dead. All without anesthesia and without the permission of the person being murdered. As terrible as child abuse is, I would consider the act of carving up a person unwillingly is worse... and yet we can watch the Mexican drug cartels doing their thing up close and in technicolor... so, child porn is documentation of a crime, but it is not actually a crime itself... until you criminalize possession of certain 1s and 0s.
Another reason is that the production of child porn can be done for money if the imagery is legal to sell. We all know how people are about money and it is guaranteed that people would find children to molest if they thought they could sell the images afterwards.
You know what? This subject is too disturbing. I am done.
TL;DR, child porn is documentation of a crime that is so heinous that the Attorney General at the time (80s?) thought that enacting a law counter to the Constitution was a worthwhile trade.
"Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
It's completely natural that Zuckerberg should want government intervention. It passes responsibility for content and simultaneously puts up huge barriers to entry for new competition.
Two birds, one stone.
“They will advocate some institutionalized changes in the way social media should work. Every change will involve compliance costs. Facebook will make sure that it can complyand that its competitors cannot without great expense. That will give them a distinct advantage in the marketplace, make it more difficult for startups to compete, and guarantee this platform a leading place by law. This is why Mark readily agreed to be regulated. Regulations always work to the advantage of the largest market players.”
https://www.aier.org/article/f...
Zuckerberg is a not a good guy, heâ(TM)s a devious, slimy snake and.......the chance of Trump getting re-elected grows ever single day....didnâ(TM)t need Russia the first time and definitely wonâ(TM)t need it this time when he runs against_____ (insert socialist name here)