It also mentions that the pot needs to be in a locked box fixed to the inside of the vehicle or trailer. That rule wouldn't mean much if it was a locked box attached to a bicycle.
You're anon, so I shouldn't expect much anyway. Technically, just about every android phone on the market right now is an option without this feature. There is literally no way to know which manufacturers are going to support it or not in the future. However, pretty much any device that comes with an unlocked bootloader would be a place to start. I would imagine the manufacturer's that embrace that market wouldn't use this feature. In the off chance they do, an unlocked bootloader means you still ultimately have some control.
You incorrectly(partially) compared the situation to Windows. My counterpoint was in regards to the actual topic, Android, and not Windows. However, there are options for laptops without Windows. They are limited, and generally found online. You'll also find that you're not likely to save much money getting one without Windows.
There are a number of options available, The choice isn't this or nothing. The choice is this, that, the other, or nothing. People aren't guaranteed there will be a phone that meets all of their wants. The best you can do is decide which are most important and choose one that meets those..
If it was an upgrade forced on an existing device, you have a point. For any device that is sold with the feature, you're knowingly purchasing a device that performs this check. That means you don't care enough to check, don't mind it, or want the feature. Regardless of which one, it isn't malware at that point.
In this case, they're obviously talking about the fact that Apple is relatively upfront about the fact that you're going to use the phone as they decide. A flip phone is going to be even more restricted in function than an iPhone. You're basically just picking which name you want the devil to go by.
Sure...and with that in mind please do try walking through Times Square with a shotgun across your back. Catch up with us in 5-15, 3 with good behavior.
That would all depend, is the gun loaded or are you a resident of NYC? If the answer is no to both, you're in the clear. You'll probably be stopped, at the least, but peaceable journey laws apply.
Not really countering any argument, just pointing it out.
But, where is your proof that it doesn't have a bias? How many left-handed trans-gender left-wing protestants with purple skin have fallen to their death?
Ultimately, there is very little difference between "God chose me to tell you what he said" and "God sent me to rule on his behalf". The rules are still backed by God.
My understanding of the code is mostly limited to brief internet searches. But, based on the preface of Hammurabi's code it is backed by religion. So, wouldn't it be more accurate to say it's the oldest known set of religious rules?
Based on their existence, I have to assume the religious rules were necessary at the time. People are entirely capable of being moral on the own, but even in current society religion is needed to keep some people in line. Whether it be for the instilled morals, or for the feeling that life and what you do with it matters.
Wouldn't making them feel empowered be the opposite of what they would want? That could incite a slave uprising... or at least a belief they could apply for a better job.
Per the article, the likes occurred before FB expanded the options. Liking was the only way to show any feeling at all about a comment... short of writing your own. While there isn't much in the way of specifics, and don't want to attribute intention,what if the guy thought the defamation was humorously extreme and wanted to draw attention to the stupidity of it? He isn't explicitly endorsing the comments by hitting a button. I mean, hell.. I've seen people like posts about tragic events. It isn't like people are endorsing bombings and storms.
The answer to all three is pretty much "I am altering the deal, pray I don’t alter it any further." Where their are no contracts with the customer, just change it. Where there are contracts, change it upon renewal. If the customers don't like it, they can go to a non-existent competitor.
Slashdot Mirror
It also mentions that the pot needs to be in a locked box fixed to the inside of the vehicle or trailer. That rule wouldn't mean much if it was a locked box attached to a bicycle.
You're anon, so I shouldn't expect much anyway. Technically, just about every android phone on the market right now is an option without this feature. There is literally no way to know which manufacturers are going to support it or not in the future. However, pretty much any device that comes with an unlocked bootloader would be a place to start. I would imagine the manufacturer's that embrace that market wouldn't use this feature. In the off chance they do, an unlocked bootloader means you still ultimately have some control.
You incorrectly(partially) compared the situation to Windows. My counterpoint was in regards to the actual topic, Android, and not Windows. However, there are options for laptops without Windows. They are limited, and generally found online. You'll also find that you're not likely to save much money getting one without Windows.
No need to lie to support your side of the argument. There are options w/o this feature.
There are a number of options available, The choice isn't this or nothing. The choice is this, that, the other, or nothing. People aren't guaranteed there will be a phone that meets all of their wants. The best you can do is decide which are most important and choose one that meets those..
If it was an upgrade forced on an existing device, you have a point. For any device that is sold with the feature, you're knowingly purchasing a device that performs this check. That means you don't care enough to check, don't mind it, or want the feature. Regardless of which one, it isn't malware at that point.
In this case, they're obviously talking about the fact that Apple is relatively upfront about the fact that you're going to use the phone as they decide. A flip phone is going to be even more restricted in function than an iPhone. You're basically just picking which name you want the devil to go by.
Just as a point, if there is a setting to enable/disable the security check.. you make the security check easier to bypass.
Sure...and with that in mind please do try walking through Times Square with a shotgun across your back. Catch up with us in 5-15, 3 with good behavior.
That would all depend, is the gun loaded or are you a resident of NYC? If the answer is no to both, you're in the clear. You'll probably be stopped, at the least, but peaceable journey laws apply.
Not really countering any argument, just pointing it out.
But, where is your proof that it doesn't have a bias? How many left-handed trans-gender left-wing protestants with purple skin have fallen to their death?
Ultimately, there is very little difference between "God chose me to tell you what he said" and "God sent me to rule on his behalf". The rules are still backed by God.
My understanding of the code is mostly limited to brief internet searches. But, based on the preface of Hammurabi's code it is backed by religion. So, wouldn't it be more accurate to say it's the oldest known set of religious rules?
Based on their existence, I have to assume the religious rules were necessary at the time. People are entirely capable of being moral on the own, but even in current society religion is needed to keep some people in line. Whether it be for the instilled morals, or for the feeling that life and what you do with it matters.
Maybe he just hates himself? I would, if I was him.
They're saying not compatible. What this likely means is a change in pin layout.
I'm not defending the ban or anything, but you can fit more comics into checked than you could carry-on. So, from a quantity aspect... Yes.
If running from a T-Rex was an actual concern, I would venture most people would be fit enough to pull it off.
It's not deceptive at all.. Quality = how much money they bring in. Service = what you get when they think the quality is high enough.
And the fact that the government is removing said protections just shows that most Americans are right not to trust them.
Wouldn't making them feel empowered be the opposite of what they would want? That could incite a slave uprising... or at least a belief they could apply for a better job.
While I wouldn't place her at the top of my list, she isn't ugly enough that I would assume nobody would be interested.
Per the article, the likes occurred before FB expanded the options. Liking was the only way to show any feeling at all about a comment... short of writing your own. While there isn't much in the way of specifics, and don't want to attribute intention,what if the guy thought the defamation was humorously extreme and wanted to draw attention to the stupidity of it? He isn't explicitly endorsing the comments by hitting a button. I mean, hell.. I've seen people like posts about tragic events. It isn't like people are endorsing bombings and storms.
Not without competition in the market, which is a luxury in the US when it comes to ISPs.
More often than not, when a major company doesn't bring legal action.. it's because they're not sure they can win.
The answer to all three is pretty much "I am altering the deal, pray I don’t alter it any further." Where their are no contracts with the customer, just change it. Where there are contracts, change it upon renewal. If the customers don't like it, they can go to a non-existent competitor.