please be aware that very soon the use of encryption may end up being cause for suspicion . If you have nothing to hide, you wouldnt be hiding anything.
which has this permissions screen.... System Tools Change network connectivity, change Wi-Fi state , read system log files, prevent phone from sleeping Network Communication Full Internet access Phone Calls Read phone state and identity Storage Modify/delete SD card contents
So, not a whole lot of difference. The arguments on which radio app to use needs to be on the merits of the app/song selection, not on the treatment of your privacy.
exactly. Everyone needs to remember that there is a base percentage chance of cancer already, around 20% i think, and these exposures are upping this percentage to 21%. Even if my statement is oversimplified and incorrect, it is not as incorrect as those saying that 100mSv / hr will kill you in exactly one hour.
The other confusion I keep hearing is that this will increase existing chances... I have a family history of colon cancer, so I watch it closely. Radiation exposure is an independent risk, it doesnt take my chances and double the likelihood.
maybe the niche can be avoided if the tablets get big enough to view from a greater distance. Of course, then you wouldnt necessarily want the multi-touch features, maybe just a magic stick that could remotely direct you through options.
Dieing younger isnt necessarily dieing faster. The real number is that people spend the vast majority of their health care costs in the last 5 years of their lives. Now , if those five years start at 50 or at 75 , the costs are still 5 five years of end of life care. If you want to consider that money later will be worth less, therefore the cost will be higher, then that is a tenuous argument at best. The overall cost to a fully socialist society will be less as the amount of time that a person is on the planet has been reduced by smoking. This is independent of the cost of their health care, especially end of life care. It is nearly all the same.
The costs of ongoing non-end of life care is the topic at hand. That could be reduced by a healthier lifestyle. Of course, I try to stay healthy riding a bike and my medical costs associated with that can be extreme, and I havent been run over by a van yet. YMMV
Dont many CEOs at the top of their games make $1 a year. The benefits that the company provides makes up for the lack of cash outlay. The free trips, free mail, junkets, and other nonsense of a politician should , by your argument, be plenty for them... along with the dollar.
hmmm, a decade in computers can be a real long time. this is a fun challenge off the top of my head... The first consumer 1 Ghz cpu , AGP ports were new , the shock of Steve Jobs removing floppies , and that long ass slot were all happening ten years back. SCSI cards and the multitude of cables kept me busy. 5 cable video connections using BNC were the best, I am not sure if DVI was in place yet. Monitors weighed a frikking ton, and pixel quantity was actually better then HD if you spent the cash. Jazz drives, zip drives . I cant even remember the RAM type that I used. I think I had a pentium II and a thunderbird overclocked, and teh AMD required that horrible bit of hackery with actually writing on the chip with a pencil to bridge some contacts.
ok, you are correct. I hate talking to cowards, but I have to give credit to you. The main basis of my point, which would stand better if i had my facts straight, is that the idea of expiration wasnt a devious plan by Bush, but a condition forced by the structure of our government. The basic concept still stands, just that reconciliation to get through the filibuster was the requirement, not an opposition controlled congress.
This skill is a little less amazing than you say. The congress ( both houses ) was controlled by Democrats who did not want to go along. The compromise was the expiration. Bush would have much preferred permanence. You are saying that those in control of writing the actual bills were willing to take a chance of wearing all of the egg. If this is true, then the Dems of the time were just plain stupid, and Bush should get no credit for picking on people dumber than him.
please be aware that very soon the use of encryption may end up being cause for suspicion . If you have nothing to hide, you wouldnt be hiding anything.
nope. which is why when you search for the phrase " once in a blue moon" , the answer comes back in Hz ...
well played. You forgot man bash after man complain
I thought you were my last boss, until you said subtly. He straight out told me i was getting screwed, and offered to be a reference.
getting married is plenty popular as a concept. There just isnt a clear man page on how to start the process.
what ? 65536 ports should be enough for anybody?
just like the metric system
-- != ...
good thing he wasnt attempting to meet your expectations!
which has this permissions screen ....
System Tools
Change network connectivity, change Wi-Fi state , read system log files, prevent phone from sleeping
Network Communication
Full Internet access
Phone Calls
Read phone state and identity
Storage
Modify/delete SD card contents
So, not a whole lot of difference. The arguments on which radio app to use needs to be on the merits of the app/song selection, not on the treatment of your privacy.
yup , the stalkers employed by pandora can send Barry White tunes to any stranger that they need to get in the mood.
It would be like a television, but a flat one!
wait, what??? the helium goes to the moon? that is why balloons float? what attracts this He? is the moon a big magnet for this stuff ? :)
exactly. Everyone needs to remember that there is a base percentage chance of cancer already, around 20% i think, and these exposures are upping this percentage to 21%. Even if my statement is oversimplified and incorrect, it is not as incorrect as those saying that 100mSv / hr will kill you in exactly one hour.
The other confusion I keep hearing is that this will increase existing chances ... I have a family history of colon cancer, so I watch it closely. Radiation exposure is an independent risk, it doesnt take my chances and double the likelihood.
maybe the niche can be avoided if the tablets get big enough to view from a greater distance. Of course, then you wouldnt necessarily want the multi-touch features, maybe just a magic stick that could remotely direct you through options.
sounds like fun , lets find out what happens... I have an ant, you get the catapult!
the healthy person. The fatty is waiting on an elevator
Dieing younger isnt necessarily dieing faster. The real number is that people spend the vast majority of their health care costs in the last 5 years of their lives. Now , if those five years start at 50 or at 75 , the costs are still 5 five years of end of life care. If you want to consider that money later will be worth less, therefore the cost will be higher, then that is a tenuous argument at best. The overall cost to a fully socialist society will be less as the amount of time that a person is on the planet has been reduced by smoking. This is independent of the cost of their health care, especially end of life care. It is nearly all the same.
The costs of ongoing non-end of life care is the topic at hand. That could be reduced by a healthier lifestyle. Of course, I try to stay healthy riding a bike and my medical costs associated with that can be extreme, and I havent been run over by a van yet. YMMV
sure thing.
Dont many CEOs at the top of their games make $1 a year. The benefits that the company provides makes up for the lack of cash outlay. The free trips, free mail, junkets, and other nonsense of a politician should , by your argument, be plenty for them... along with the dollar.
hmmm, a decade in computers can be a real long time. this is a fun challenge off the top of my head ... The first consumer 1 Ghz cpu , AGP ports were new , the shock of Steve Jobs removing floppies , and that long ass slot were all happening ten years back. SCSI cards and the multitude of cables kept me busy. 5 cable video connections using BNC were the best, I am not sure if DVI was in place yet. Monitors weighed a frikking ton, and pixel quantity was actually better then HD if you spent the cash. Jazz drives, zip drives . I cant even remember the RAM type that I used. I think I had a pentium II and a thunderbird overclocked, and teh AMD required that horrible bit of hackery with actually writing on the chip with a pencil to bridge some contacts.
ok, you are correct. I hate talking to cowards, but I have to give credit to you. The main basis of my point, which would stand better if i had my facts straight, is that the idea of expiration wasnt a devious plan by Bush, but a condition forced by the structure of our government. The basic concept still stands, just that reconciliation to get through the filibuster was the requirement, not an opposition controlled congress.
This skill is a little less amazing than you say. The congress ( both houses ) was controlled by Democrats who did not want to go along. The compromise was the expiration. Bush would have much preferred permanence. You are saying that those in control of writing the actual bills were willing to take a chance of wearing all of the egg. If this is true, then the Dems of the time were just plain stupid, and Bush should get no credit for picking on people dumber than him.
but if they were armed properly, they could just blast their way in!
ewww.. C3PO was meant to be a companion???
Are you sure. I thought that they both got what they wanted out of the deal , a ton of good press and free publicity.