place them so close to the screen that I have 6 projectors between me and my display, or just far enough away that I am in between my projectors and their destination ?
he is also sitting back 8 or 10 feet from the screens. If the idea is for immersion and peripheral vision, then you need to be up close and surrounded. Sitting back there just means you have very high resolution with shit in the way, and you cant really see the resolution at that distance anyhow... or at least you wouldnt notice lower res.
I am still running the goofy distro that came with the box. It is amazingly tender to change. I can add repositories to apt, but every update that pulls from a new repo has to be closely watched to make certain that only new files are added. If anything is changed and updated, the system is highly likely to give strange results.
A newer Ubuntu would be the correct path, but my SSD died, and a laptop with less than 3G of storage (total) is not good for very much no matter what OS is running.
I agree with you completely, but there are outliers that occur on a fairly frequent basis that result in long slashdot discussions. I am proud that our process usually results in the right decisions when the fights are appealed through all of the steps, if the steps can be afforded. I dont know if Italy provides useful appeals that can correct this obviously bad ruling. I just do not feel obligated to feel better, when we may only be fairly even.
I find it really funny that you are modded flamebait and I am a troll.
yup, my eeepc 901 is as updated as the base distro will let me be, and youtube is about to drop support for that also. If I cared I would put a different linux on it, but loss of youtube access just isnt going to kill me. Many current flash sites wont work at all, without a big declaration of non-support, the boxes just dont do anything.
The relativism of not having that exact instance of stupidity in our system, while having many other instances that I do think of as quite ridiculous, does not make me feel obligated to feel more patriotic.
apparently you don't even have to visit there to be convicted of their laws. They're apparently able to find you guilty of allowing other people to post to the internet.
any grammar nazis notice what i just did ??? you cant complain all the time if you dont give credit!
While I am not sure how Canada works out co-pays, prescriptions, vision and dental, I am certain that around 15000 for me, my wife, and my son was spent last year on our combined needs. Not many serious issues, but we did managed to max out some deductibles. I felt that the care was good, and fast. If the price isnt actually going down or the service getting drastically better, then I am not sure where the benefit to change is on the dollar for dollar argument.
Now when the issue is coverage being dropped unexpectedly, or premiums shooting through the roof because you got sick, the fix is to simply hold the insurance companies feet to the fire... they sold a product that was basically a bet or a gamble, you win some , you lose some. If the citizens played by these rules, then we would get to take our premiums back if we didnt use the coverage... that would get some attention.
Would you really be willing to go in front of a judge to argue that the information that you posted for the entire world to see was relayed by this site to, well, the entire world?
Just because you did it at twitter.com and they displayed it at pleaserobme, the outcome is the same. If there site was called idiotsadvertisedumbthings.com , would they be less intrusive to your home. I dont think that they are really helping robbers, but calling attention to what information is there.
It is not like they are running a fencing service for cat burglars.
From the obviously imperfect information that I have read, we have... day 1 ) not doping day 2 ) doping! day 3 ) not doping
Now, from what I have read, the levels do not auto-correct this quickly. Having an American lab find traces of something in the day 2 test is not a shock... the easy conclusion is tampering or mis-handling. If no other labs can show a human scale decline in the markers being observed (days 3,4,5) then there is an issue that should call question into the process that destroys a persons career.
yes. A large reason that the French have not been able to compete from the late 90's until recently is that they actually implemented strong doping controls on their own team members. This doesnt mean that some other riders didnt have greater skill, but it does give reason beyond French jealousy for their attacks on riders from other countries. Now that almost all riders are getting clean or getting caught, we have seen French riders give exciting days and even GC performances for the past few years... most likely at a statistical equivalent of riders from other countries
That said, I still believe Landis as innocent. The removal of the steroids from his system down to normal the next day is too much for me to swallow. The lab has to be impervious to error, or all tests are thrown out. The lab seems to be as accurate as the police who investigated OJ Simpson.
It was named al0ha.trojan.jpg.exe and it was also sent to thousands of unsuspecting hotmail users at the same time as it was sent to threatexpert and virustotal ( they only got it as a secondary action) .
reading the article is definitely cheating. If you cant divine the information from the summary , at least try to infer it. The low uid guys only read the first three letters of the headline.
There are just enough people in some places that see things they dont like and declare "there should be a law against that" , instead of just ignoring what they dont like. When a critical mass of these people get together we end up with crazy laws.
Whenever I hear someone say " there should be a law against that " , I want to punch them in the face, but there is a law against that...
Slashdot Mirror
place them so close to the screen that I have 6 projectors between me and my display, or just far enough away that I am in between my projectors and their destination ?
he is also sitting back 8 or 10 feet from the screens. If the idea is for immersion and peripheral vision, then you need to be up close and surrounded. Sitting back there just means you have very high resolution with shit in the way, and you cant really see the resolution at that distance anyhow ... or at least you wouldnt notice lower res.
Just ask your neighbors to cover the side of their house in white plywood for the right screen size
Promise them money for their district. It isn't like their actions aren't easily bought.
I am still running the goofy distro that came with the box. It is amazingly tender to change. I can add repositories to apt, but every update that pulls from a new repo has to be closely watched to make certain that only new files are added. If anything is changed and updated, the system is highly likely to give strange results.
A newer Ubuntu would be the correct path, but my SSD died, and a laptop with less than 3G of storage (total) is not good for very much no matter what OS is running.
I agree with you completely, but there are outliers that occur on a fairly frequent basis that result in long slashdot discussions. I am proud that our process usually results in the right decisions when the fights are appealed through all of the steps, if the steps can be afforded. I dont know if Italy provides useful appeals that can correct this obviously bad ruling. I just do not feel obligated to feel better, when we may only be fairly even.
I find it really funny that you are modded flamebait and I am a troll.
yup, my eeepc 901 is as updated as the base distro will let me be, and youtube is about to drop support for that also. If I cared I would put a different linux on it, but loss of youtube access just isnt going to kill me. Many current flash sites wont work at all, without a big declaration of non-support, the boxes just dont do anything.
The relativism of not having that exact instance of stupidity in our system, while having many other instances that I do think of as quite ridiculous, does not make me feel obligated to feel more patriotic.
apparently you don't even have to visit there to be convicted of their laws. They're apparently able to find you guilty of allowing other people to post to the internet.
any grammar nazis notice what i just did ??? you cant complain all the time if you dont give credit!
sounds like the non-recruiting recruiting strategy ... " Im not trying to recruit you , but the benefits are pretty good if you join"
While I am not sure how Canada works out co-pays, prescriptions, vision and dental, I am certain that around 15000 for me, my wife, and my son was spent last year on our combined needs. Not many serious issues, but we did managed to max out some deductibles. I felt that the care was good, and fast. If the price isnt actually going down or the service getting drastically better, then I am not sure where the benefit to change is on the dollar for dollar argument.
Now when the issue is coverage being dropped unexpectedly, or premiums shooting through the roof because you got sick, the fix is to simply hold the insurance companies feet to the fire... they sold a product that was basically a bet or a gamble, you win some , you lose some. If the citizens played by these rules, then we would get to take our premiums back if we didnt use the coverage... that would get some attention.
Would you really be willing to go in front of a judge to argue that the information that you posted for the entire world to see was relayed by this site to, well, the entire world?
Just because you did it at twitter.com and they displayed it at pleaserobme, the outcome is the same. If there site was called idiotsadvertisedumbthings.com , would they be less intrusive to your home. I dont think that they are really helping robbers, but calling attention to what information is there.
It is not like they are running a fencing service for cat burglars.
drop you phone off a cliff ? There is an app for that !
From the obviously imperfect information that I have read, we have ...
day 1 ) not doping
day 2 ) doping!
day 3 ) not doping
Now, from what I have read, the levels do not auto-correct this quickly. Having an American lab find traces of something in the day 2 test is not a shock... the easy conclusion is tampering or mis-handling. If no other labs can show a human scale decline in the markers being observed (days 3,4,5) then there is an issue that should call question into the process that destroys a persons career.
yes. A large reason that the French have not been able to compete from the late 90's until recently is that they actually implemented strong doping controls on their own team members. This doesnt mean that some other riders didnt have greater skill, but it does give reason beyond French jealousy for their attacks on riders from other countries. Now that almost all riders are getting clean or getting caught, we have seen French riders give exciting days and even GC performances for the past few years... most likely at a statistical equivalent of riders from other countries
That said, I still believe Landis as innocent. The removal of the steroids from his system down to normal the next day is too much for me to swallow. The lab has to be impervious to error, or all tests are thrown out. The lab seems to be as accurate as the police who investigated OJ Simpson.
so this is another attempt of a distribution channel trying to become a vertically integrated content provider.
It was named al0ha.trojan.jpg.exe and it was also sent to thousands of unsuspecting hotmail users at the same time as it was sent to threatexpert and virustotal ( they only got it as a secondary action) .
reading the article is definitely cheating. If you cant divine the information from the summary , at least try to infer it. The low uid guys only read the first three letters of the headline.
Does Bill Gates look like a bitch to you?
So if I register as a lawyer in Washington state, then I will automatically start getting paid to never sue microsoft ?
exactly , this is why I am still using my trusted analog rabbit ears ...
I am fairly certain that my mother-in-law is not friends with any elected officials.
There are just enough people in some places that see things they dont like and declare "there should be a law against that" , instead of just ignoring what they dont like. When a critical mass of these people get together we end up with crazy laws.
Whenever I hear someone say " there should be a law against that " , I want to punch them in the face, but there is a law against that ...
Your toaster doesn't retrieve your email ????
no wonder you had to post as an AC.
I am certain that most of the debaters of quantum thermodynamics fail also.