Slashdot Mirror


User: nitehawk214

nitehawk214's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4,108
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4,108

  1. Re:Our first act on the moon on The Mystery of the 'Only Camera To Come Back From the Moon' · · Score: 1

    Failed link, that was supposed to be "There are bags of shit on the moon."

  2. Re:Our first act on the moon on The Mystery of the 'Only Camera To Come Back From the Moon' · · Score: 1

    You are worried about cameras?

    There are on the moon.

  3. Re:You know what they call alternative medicine... on Jimmy Wales To 'Holistic Healers': Prove Your Claims the Old-Fashioned Way · · Score: 1

    Mmm, breaded mussels.

  4. Re:Today; my bank! on Big Data Breaches Give Credit Monitoring Services a Boost · · Score: 1

    From the bayesian avoidance text in your spam:

    We can kill you if you try to run when we attack you

    Spammers are getting serious these days.

  5. Re:Redefine hunting. on Drone-Assisted Hunting To Be Illegal In Alaska · · Score: 1

    Hunting for "sport".

    Why is it against the rules to take a cab to skip over the boring middle part of a marathon?
    Why is it against the rules to use a golf cart on the PGA tour?
    Why can't we use a snowmobile during cross-country skiing races?

    If all you care about is getting the kill without any effort at all... go to a butcher's shop.

  6. Re: Rent-seeking? on Apple Reportedly In Talks With Comcast For Separate Apple Streaming Path · · Score: 2

    If not it would look like monopoly abuse, using their dominant position to cut margins to levels others couldn't sustain and paying for exclusive access to customers.

    Response 1: What monopoly?
    Response 2: You mean how Google uses it's monopoly on search to fund Android and give it away for free - reducing the margin to 0?

    Response 1: What monopoly?

  7. Re:Rent-seeking? on Apple Reportedly In Talks With Comcast For Separate Apple Streaming Path · · Score: 1

    It will be interesting to see if Apple are forced to charge a higher price because of this. If not it would look like monopoly abuse, using their dominant position to cut margins to levels others couldn't sustain and paying for exclusive access to customers.

    It does seem rather un-Apple like though. Normally they just tell service providers they should be privileged to have Apple products on their network and must provide a minimum level of service to them, like the did with the iPhone. Maybe it's due to Jobs not being around any more, maybe Comcast learned from the mobile carrier's mistakes.

    Apple already charges higher prices. The extra "ability to stream" will probably be easily absorbed into their fees. But the prices is miniscule compared to the ability to get google and microsoft devices locked out of the internet.

  8. Re:Mutants on Why US Gov't Retirement Involves a Hole in the Ground Near Pittsburgh · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mutants living below New New York? That is New Pittsburgh...

    Actually that is the regular Pittsburgh. We call them "yinzers".

  9. Re:Peering and Bandwidth Symmetry on Level 3 Wants To Make Peering a Net Neutrality Issue · · Score: 1

    you have to pay me for the traffic you are giving to me to deliver to my customers

    Your customers already paid you. If you don't deliver, they will be happy to pay someone else.

    Of course the providers will either legislate themselves into a monopoly or oligarchy and the customers get screwed.

  10. Re:Two Words on Level 3 Wants To Make Peering a Net Neutrality Issue · · Score: 1

    A class action lawsuit will get you a t-shirt, ball cap, and a bag of peanuts (airline size, which holds about three peanuts). The proper solution is to turn the pipes into public infrastructure, like water, lights, and sewage, and allow service managers, not providers to sell time share.

    No, a class action lawsuit gets you coupons for 20% off your next purchase at the corporation you sued. And since you were suing a corporation, you were probably not going to patronize it; so they win.

    Well, the lawyers get paid in cash, so they are the actual winners.

  11. Re:Choosing where to live on Level 3 Wants To Make Peering a Net Neutrality Issue · · Score: 1

    The only internet provider I have available to me is Comcast.

    Available to you, or available where you happen to live at the moment? I know it's not a feasible option for everyone, but some people report having taken Internet access into account when choosing where to live.

    So your response to a monopoly is to run away and not fight the abuse?

  12. Easy on MtGox Finds 200,000 Bitcoins In Old Wallet · · Score: 0

    When they realized there was no way they would ever get away with stealing so many bitcoins and having a huge debt, MtGox "found" enough to cover their debts.

    The account holders are still fucked, though. Why anyone would use bitcoin at this point is beyond me.

  13. Re:Pleeeeeeeease? on Interviews: Ask J. Michael Straczynski What You Will · · Score: 1

    If JMS had control over it. Talk to Warner Bros if you don't want to see this stuff get buried.

  14. Re:Don't get it on XKCD Author's Unpublished Book Has Already Become a Best-Seller · · Score: 1

    It looks terrible either way.

  15. Your choice of manager speak: on CEO Says One Laptop Per Child Project Has Achieved Its Goals · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. "Has Achieved Its Goals" == "on track to being fully realized"
    2. "Mission Accomplished" Redefine goals to state what has already been done, declare victory, forget about the rest. (banner and photo-op on aircraft carrier optional)

  16. Re:If you believe in full disclosure on Full-Disclosure Security List Suspended Indefinitely · · Score: 1

    And if turns out that the real reason is... "We are tired of fighting trolls and don't want to do it anymore." Fine. That is their right, nobody is forcing them to do it.

    The only thing that makes sense here is they have already been served some legal gag order thing, but I would expect that to come out somehow.

  17. Re:A tragedy on Full-Disclosure Security List Suspended Indefinitely · · Score: 1

    Additional thought: responsible disclosure only works because of the threat of full disclosure.

    No, often it works because if one person outside your organisation discovers something then when you get that issue raised with you it is pretty easy to take that to management and show them why the bug needs fixing. If one person can find it so can someone else who is less honest and hence might use it for fraud.

    So responsible disclosure works because even if the threat is never disclosed fully by the person who found it, it might be discovered by some one else independently.

    This just encourages management to cover it up. Only the thread of the vulnerability becoming public incentivises management to fix it.

  18. Re:A tragedy on Full-Disclosure Security List Suspended Indefinitely · · Score: 1

    Additional thought: responsible disclosure only works because of the threat of full disclosure.

    And completely fails if the definition of "responsible" is defined by the party that would have to suffer the consequences.

  19. Re:Who? on Full-Disclosure Security List Suspended Indefinitely · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Come on then, let's have full disclosure. WHO made the threats?

    Why would the World Health Organisation do this?

  20. Re:Wrong target on Federal Student Aid Requirements At For-Profit Colleges Overhauled · · Score: 1

    If you go to a community college you can get an associates degree, and then you can typically find a 4 year that will accept you, even for online classes.

    And an associate degree is just as vaulable from a community college as a major school, and costs 1/10 as much. In most areas, if you are a working adult that lives in the city the college is in, you go practically for free. Once there you can transfer to a 4-year school for a bachelors and effectively save half your cost on education.

  21. Re:Don't get it on XKCD Author's Unpublished Book Has Already Become a Best-Seller · · Score: 5, Funny

    If only Slashdot's comment form allowed input of stick-figures, it might be the case that we wouldn't need Xkcd...


    ------->O
    |Fuck| \|/
    | You | |
    ------ / \

  22. Re:Dancing on the head of a pin on IAU To Uwingu: You Can't Name That Martian Crater Either · · Score: 1

    Way ahead of you. I have my own list, everything is named after me. I'm working on a Firefox plugin to preface all nouns with the appropriate possessives, but I'm having a bit of work making it respond properly to the tangled mess of names people use.

    Now, play nice on my Slashdot. and think of me when you look up at my moon and stars tonight.

    Everything is named Anonymous?

    Well, that is fitting...

  23. Re:Dwarfed? yeah right on Japan Marks 3rd Anniversary of Tsunami Disaster · · Score: 1

    Maybe both?

  24. Re:Why can't this shit happen to North Korea? on Japan Marks 3rd Anniversary of Tsunami Disaster · · Score: 1

    Why do you hate the Japanese? The A-bombs likely saved a million+ Japanese lives. Invasion or starving them out, would have cost much more.

    No they weren't ready to surrender. That's pure bullshit.

    He didn't say he didn't hate them.

    He did say he hates Koreans a lot more.

  25. Re:Dwarfed? yeah right on Japan Marks 3rd Anniversary of Tsunami Disaster · · Score: 1

    One must not generalize.

    Always? Or just in this specific case?