"But in any case, he's right: there are a huge group of Americans who simply pay no income taxes and instead live off government support. They will support Obama regardless of what Romney says because they want to continue leeching off the rest of society."
So that's why the preponderance of people who don't pay income tax live in states that vote for Democrats! Obviously, right?
I don't know what you mean, but a good Christian would indeed render unto Caesar what is Caesar's, and also realize that the things we do to the least of our brothers, we do to Christ.
Because that's the actual philosophy attributed to Jesus, and I don't really understand the problem with it.
Why would ATT give you a responsive network? You're paying for the crappy one now (so am I), but what are you going to do? Go to one of the other arms of the oligopoly?
"The ridiculous fiasco which attended the attempt at aerial navigation in the Langley flying machine was not unexpected⦠it might be assumed that the flying machine which will really fly might be evolved by the combined and continuous efforts of mathematicians and mechanicians in from one million to ten million years"
I'm gonna go ahead and defer to the people actually doing it, rather than the armchair quarterbacks saying how dumb those people are for not doing it their way.
The fact that you refer to more than one party as a "third party" is emblematic of the impossibility of third parties doing anything ever in the current structure of American representative democracy.
It's a pretty thing to think, but until the voting system changes, "third parties" will never get a seat at the table.
Guess what: I don't think that paying (or, more commonly, not paying) to clean stuff up is good enough. I want those disasters to be prevented, as much as possible.
...today. When those parts are available in volume. It wasn't very long ago that a "fairly powerful" desktop cost over a grand.
Sure, today's $500 PC is way more powerful than eight years' ago $1000 PC, but there's nothing to say that desktop components will continue to be cheap and available as they are today.
If the original investors sold their stock at $38, why do they care if it's now worth $25? They won, the institutional investors lostkinda like always?
Slashdot Mirror
I agree, but that's only a problem for the "Christian" Republicans.
"But in any case, he's right: there are a huge group of Americans who simply pay no income taxes and instead live off government support. They will support Obama regardless of what Romney says because they want to continue leeching off the rest of society."
So that's why the preponderance of people who don't pay income tax live in states that vote for Democrats! Obviously, right?
Well,
http://www.businessinsider.com/mitt-romney-47-percent-no-income-tax-map-red-republican-states-2012-9
not exactly.
If I were running to be the leader of the free world, you damn well should expect me to be good in adverse conditions.
I don't know what you mean, but a good Christian would indeed render unto Caesar what is Caesar's, and also realize that the things we do to the least of our brothers, we do to Christ.
Because that's the actual philosophy attributed to Jesus, and I don't really understand the problem with it.
"The powered segment of the flight will be powered by a glide..."
Surely you meant "The powered segment of the flight will be followed by a glide..."
Why would ATT give you a responsive network? You're paying for the crappy one now (so am I), but what are you going to do? Go to one of the other arms of the oligopoly?
Which are the cultures that do not go to war, that are not protected by warlike neighbors?
What is "human nature" apart from "the way that our culture has developed"?
New York Times, October 9, 1903:
"The ridiculous fiasco which attended the attempt at aerial navigation in the Langley flying machine was not unexpected⦠it might be assumed that the flying machine which will really fly might be evolved by the combined and continuous efforts of mathematicians and mechanicians in from one million to ten million years"
Orville Wright's diary, October 9, 1903:
"We began assembly today."
Your perspective is limited.
I'm gonna go ahead and defer to the people actually doing it, rather than the armchair quarterbacks saying how dumb those people are for not doing it their way.
It's almost like the conditions at mach 3 and mach 6 are pretty different or something.
The fact that you refer to more than one party as a "third party" is emblematic of the impossibility of third parties doing anything ever in the current structure of American representative democracy.
It's a pretty thing to think, but until the voting system changes, "third parties" will never get a seat at the table.
Bhopal?
BP's gulf spill?
Exxon Valdez?
Guess what: I don't think that paying (or, more commonly, not paying) to clean stuff up is good enough. I want those disasters to be prevented, as much as possible.
You're using an electronic device that can connect you, basically for free, to global audiences for free?
And you think there's no progress in the last 100 years?
You have a very strange brain.
Reverse what trend? Reverse the trend to lower and lower automotive fatalities?
Bad trend to reverse.
...today. When those parts are available in volume. It wasn't very long ago that a "fairly powerful" desktop cost over a grand.
Sure, today's $500 PC is way more powerful than eight years' ago $1000 PC, but there's nothing to say that desktop components will continue to be cheap and available as they are today.
Right now? Unity.
SUCK IT, HATER. Down and clear!
I'm sorry, yelling filter, this dumbass deserved it.
If the original investors sold their stock at $38, why do they care if it's now worth $25? They won, the institutional investors lostkinda like always?
Cool, thanks for clearing that up!
So, I'm confused. Whose decision are you shitting on, and why?
Should we check with you before we buy new hardware just to see if we're making decisions you approve of or not?
"wood-fired stove which is totally sustainable."
What's the CO2 output of that stove look like?
OK, let's get back to red in tooth and claw as fast as possible.
You first.
What exactly do you intend to hunt?
"but it's their money."
No it's not. The subsidies and tax breaks they get are my money. That's the point.
So the cops are entitled to beat me up if I don't make them happy?
If that's true (and I do not think it is), I'd rather take my chances with criminals.