That's simply not true. The reason it's there is because the menu is infinitely tall. You don't have to hit a small box in two dimensions, you only have to get your mouse between the left and right boundaries of the menu item. This is an explicit design feature of Mac OS. The MacOS designers understood that the edges of the screen are, for purposes of the mouse pointer, infinitely broad.
Every time you have to move your mouse back down to the menu after overshooting slightly is wasted motion. That doesn't occur on MacOS.
Why does every window need its own menu bar? You can only really interact with one at a time. You've only got one mouse cursor.
If it's that valuable and useful, then there would be no reason to do any software updates in the future. Treat it as mission-critical hardware and don't use it for non-mission-critical purposes.
"If a student is forced to accept what is told to him without question" then the student is not in a science classroom.
However, if when the question is answered with facts and data, the student persists in the Truth of an untenable hypothesis which is not supported by facts and data, the student ought not presume to get a good grade in a science class.
Science is not a religion. I say this as both a scientist, and a religious person.
Seems like all the people who are saying "yeah, that's creepy" is the community expressing that the prevailing attitude is "stop being creepy. You might not THINK it's creepy, but we all think it's creepy, so you might want to consider not doing that."
And if they shut the door in your face, the community around you would let you know that continuing to pursue that person is Not Cool, and they would tell you in various ways.
Slashdot Mirror
When did it become my responsibility to make cops happy?
Team? There are teams?
"Hell, semi reputable idiots on the AGW team actually say we should be outlawed or otherwised silenced."
Uh, can I have a cite please?
"Are you prepared to defend that position and its implications?"
Sure.
That's not true at all. The shareholders can sell their shares. They cannot write checks on the company's books.
When was this better world?
What lack of recoil? The gun moved the boat. That's recoil.
This is a better comparison:
http://www.stratolaunch.com/
That's simply not true. The reason it's there is because the menu is infinitely tall. You don't have to hit a small box in two dimensions, you only have to get your mouse between the left and right boundaries of the menu item. This is an explicit design feature of Mac OS. The MacOS designers understood that the edges of the screen are, for purposes of the mouse pointer, infinitely broad.
Every time you have to move your mouse back down to the menu after overshooting slightly is wasted motion. That doesn't occur on MacOS.
Why does every window need its own menu bar? You can only really interact with one at a time. You've only got one mouse cursor.
If it's that valuable and useful, then there would be no reason to do any software updates in the future. Treat it as mission-critical hardware and don't use it for non-mission-critical purposes.
Working by traditional, rote methods and happy accidents is not the same as having an understanding of organic chemistry.
That's not to say it's not useful, but the structure you dismiss is what we are talking about.
In the dark ages, to a good approximation, nobody did organic chemistry.
"And this danger becomes apparent when you see statements that a student should fail because of their beliefs"
Did you think that was what I was saying? Because if it was, you were arguing with somebody different.
"Student ought not presume to succeed" is not congruent with "Student should fail."
"If a student is forced to accept what is told to him without question" then the student is not in a science classroom.
However, if when the question is answered with facts and data, the student persists in the Truth of an untenable hypothesis which is not supported by facts and data, the student ought not presume to get a good grade in a science class.
Science is not a religion. I say this as both a scientist, and a religious person.
"No TRUE Scotsman..."
OK. Tried step 1 for Season 2. It's not available in the United States.
What now?
"The idea was that the F-35 would take its place. "
That was not the idea. That idea does not make any sense.
I read it to mean that it would be against the rules to contact your son's friends via your personal account.
Definitely stop paying for K-12 education. Those kids won't be entering the job market for, like, a decade! Who needs 'em?
What you describe is called a "race to the bottom", and it's generally Bad for the citizenry.
Simple. It's not punishment.
I'm not wealthy enough to spend $50k on the joys of an abstract education. I need a job to pay for my loans.
Some people are rich, and don't have to care about that. That's great. The rest of us just gotta do what we gotta do.
Yes. Science and engineering are often advanced by never doing anything you are not absolutely certain will work perfectly.
Many of the cultures in Asia are not particularly germane to the American body phobia being discussed.
But hey, feed your rage beast!
Seems like all the people who are saying "yeah, that's creepy" is the community expressing that the prevailing attitude is "stop being creepy. You might not THINK it's creepy, but we all think it's creepy, so you might want to consider not doing that."
And if they shut the door in your face, the community around you would let you know that continuing to pursue that person is Not Cool, and they would tell you in various ways.
Doesn't give you the right to breathe, either.
It's almost like some rights are, what's the word? Oh yeah. Inalienable.