It is possible. It wouldn't be the first time a wealthy individual spent a ton of cash to lash out at his governments he felt offended by. Just look at Bin Laden.
This isn't much of a limitation for dwarf fortress logic. As long as you have sufficient power an axle can transmit state to any distance on the map. water flow has evaporation and flow rate issues that make it best to use in small units actively pumped from an aquifer. The big thing holding back DF CPU complexity is the massive amount of stuff going on at any one time in a fortress of significant size that will bring the simulation to a crawl.
It is ~20 quadrillion calories of heat. (assuming 20 megatons = 20 million metric tons).
On a large scale, there is almost no difference between a 20 megaton impact and a 20 megaton chemical explosion. For a nuclear explosion, the only difference will be that part of the energy is lost to high energy radiation like gamma rays.
If you wait for there to be a present danger, you drastically reduce your options for preventative action. Even a 50 meter asteroid is MASSIVE compared to anything we have in orbit and it could take decades to design and implement a response capable of deflecting such an orbit.
Moral equivalence? I was pointing out numerical equivalence.
In Mexico, both sides are armed as well. Most of the killings are between rival cartels or against the politicians, police and military.
In Afghanistan, ~half of the dead are civilians, killed by both US and Taliban forces. I don't have any statistics for the distribution of the dead in Mexico, so I can only make assumptions, but it wouldn't surprise me if it was a similar ratio.
10 times? The going rate for copyright infringement is a few thousand times the value of the information. The British government isn't some college student you know, they actually might have that kind of money.
wrong. You do not understand the concept of natural rights. They can not be granted and they can only be taken away by physical force. They can be suppressed by fear of punishment or by removing the tools used in exercising the right. Your rights can not be enforced, because one of your natural rights is the right to choose to not exercise them.
Laws defending your rights are to some extent a requirement of society, not the other way around.
The problem with that argument is that killing someone deprives another person of their rights while copying does not. There is no right to natural right to profit.
Oh, and it is actually widely known as "might makes right".
Slashdot Mirror
Damn you, now I am going to have to read the article.
AV only protects against known threats.
It is possible. It wouldn't be the first time a wealthy individual spent a ton of cash to lash out at his governments he felt offended by. Just look at Bin Laden.
Yes. It uses OpenGL accelerated graphics tiles. The most common tileset is mayday.
http://df.magmawiki.com/index.php/Graphics
http://afteractionreporter.com/2010/04/02/new-version-of-dwarf-fortress-with-mayday-tileset/
This isn't much of a limitation for dwarf fortress logic. As long as you have sufficient power an axle can transmit state to any distance on the map. water flow has evaporation and flow rate issues that make it best to use in small units actively pumped from an aquifer. The big thing holding back DF CPU complexity is the massive amount of stuff going on at any one time in a fortress of significant size that will bring the simulation to a crawl.
It is true. Massive block constructions and fluid flow logic were there first.
heat != temperature.
It is ~20 quadrillion calories of heat. (assuming 20 megatons = 20 million metric tons).
On a large scale, there is almost no difference between a 20 megaton impact and a 20 megaton chemical explosion. For a nuclear explosion, the only difference will be that part of the energy is lost to high energy radiation like gamma rays.
Heat is kinetic energy.
Or just a journalist that doesn't know anything about orbits and misunderstood the information he was given.
If you wait for there to be a present danger, you drastically reduce your options for preventative action. Even a 50 meter asteroid is MASSIVE compared to anything we have in orbit and it could take decades to design and implement a response capable of deflecting such an orbit.
Youu don say?
That question mark at the end of a statement has the same meaning as a quizzical, puzzled or incredulous tone of voice and facial expression.
Basically, the statement counters or conflicts with the other persons statements or arguments and the other person should explain himself.
Rebuilding?
What do drug gangs build?
Profit.
but he said rebelling
Moral equivalence? I was pointing out numerical equivalence.
In Mexico, both sides are armed as well. Most of the killings are between rival cartels or against the politicians, police and military.
In Afghanistan, ~half of the dead are civilians, killed by both US and Taliban forces. I don't have any statistics for the distribution of the dead in Mexico, so I can only make assumptions, but it wouldn't surprise me if it was a similar ratio.
hmm... I can't seem to find the select or start button on my keyboard either, what the hell.
I don't often agree with you... But this is absolutely true.
The Mexican drug cartels have killed ~28k in the 4 years.
The Taliban and US military has killed ~67k in the last 9 years in Afghanistan.
That means the Mexican cartels have a daily kill rate almost equal to the combed kill rate of the US military and Taliban at war in Afghanistan.
I hear that drinking pineapple juice helps with the taste.
That is exactly what he typed. unfortunate arrow keys don't display all that well.
10 times? The going rate for copyright infringement is a few thousand times the value of the information. The British government isn't some college student you know, they actually might have that kind of money.
Uhh, The Finnish may as well be Russians, Norway is that other country up there nobody cares about and WTF is Denmark? (Im joking everyone)
Denmark? Well Horatio, it smells kinda rotten.
I actually kinda like the idea of Swedish women marrying American Women...
wrong. You do not understand the concept of natural rights. They can not be granted and they can only be taken away by physical force. They can be suppressed by fear of punishment or by removing the tools used in exercising the right. Your rights can not be enforced, because one of your natural rights is the right to choose to not exercise them.
Laws defending your rights are to some extent a requirement of society, not the other way around.
The problem with that argument is that killing someone deprives another person of their rights while copying does not. There is no right to natural right to profit.
Oh, and it is actually widely known as "might makes right".
You mean recently?
You ever heard of Troy?