Slashdot Mirror


Las Vegas Hotel Vdara an Accidental Death Ray

evanism writes "A hotel in Las Vegas is accidentally designed to be a massive parabolic dish that focuses the suns rays into a death ray! Burns hair, plastic and causes pain." It apparently lasts for several minutes during afternoons of bright sunlight, but if you need to perform science on it, you better hurry since they plan to ruin/fix it.

218 comments

  1. Too much money to fix, thing outside the box by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    you better hurry since they plan to ruin/fix it.

    Rather than paying the incredible expense of re-engineering the hotel's windows they should just rename. Simply change the stationary and signage to "L'Hotel du Auschwitz".

    Hey, they could offer free tatoos, too. Tell people that they're lucky numbers.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Too much money to fix, thing outside the box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too soon :)

    2. Re:Too much money to fix, thing outside the box by jedidiah · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They should call out the Mythbusters. It looks like Archimede's death ray may have been vindicated.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:Too much money to fix, thing outside the box by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure causing pain and burning hair is exactly the same Archimede's death ray. At least not from the fables I remember reading. And melting plastic, well, I'm also not sure they had much plastic back then, let alone built boats out of it.

      Perhaps you could tell me more about this.

    4. Re:Too much money to fix, thing outside the box by modecx · · Score: 1

      Well, this is something of an accidental discomfort ray. If they wanted death ray power levels, I'm sure they could have done it.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    5. Re:Too much money to fix, thing outside the box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you RTFA they knew this could be a problem so they put a plastic film on the windows to make them 70% less reflective.

    6. Re:Too much money to fix, thing outside the box by pckl300 · · Score: 4, Funny

      They could take the Steve Jobs approach and just tell customers to avoid being in the hot zone

      --
      In the beginning, there was null.
    7. Re:Too much money to fix, thing outside the box by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      Well, this is something of an accidental discomfort ray. If they wanted death ray power levels, I'm sure they could have done it.

      --
      That's not a burning smell... That's the smell of freedom!

      Your signature is oddly appropriate.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    8. Re:Too much money to fix, thing outside the box by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Please, please don't let that thing out of the box...

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    9. Re:Too much money to fix, thing outside the box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      An elegant weapon, from a more civilized age

    10. Re:Too much money to fix, thing outside the box by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      1) The windows had already been coated with a material to reduce the glare by 70%.

      2) The boats weren't covered in plastic, but did use pitch, which was probably more volatile (I have not data to back that assumption).

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    11. Re:Too much money to fix, thing outside the box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Archimede's death ray

      The name is Archimedes. Its possessive is either Archimedes' or Archimedes's, depending on style.

    12. Re:Too much money to fix, thing outside the box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absence of proof is not the same as proof of absence-- i.e. just because two guys on TV could not get it to work, does not mean it can't be done.

      For example, if you want to debunk the myth that certain materials can be excited to produce phase coherent light that travels for miles, I'm sure you can get lots to people try and fail. Wouldn't be proof that lasers don't work however.

    13. Re:Too much money to fix, thing outside the box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should have went the other direction and made a self powered hotel. Put the pool on the other side.

    14. Re:Too much money to fix, thing outside the box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should call out the Mythbusters. It looks like Archimede's [sic] death ray may have been vindicated.

      It's in Vegas -- They should call in CSI.

    15. Re:Too much money to fix, thing outside the box by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      They also had some help from a bunch of MIT students.

      Of course Adam is no Archimedes and neither is Jamie. This is true of many of the things they try to replicate.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    16. Re:Too much money to fix, thing outside the box by trparky · · Score: 1

      This is a first! We invoked Godwin's Law on the first post! A world record!

    17. Re:Too much money to fix, thing outside the box by jazzmans · · Score: 1

      The more awesome thing is, they (the stupid designers) made a similar mistake with the PRADA store front in the mall called Crystal in City Center, it is a black wall with recessed lenses, and PARABOLIC REFLECTORS behind the lenses. Did I mention the walls face east and south? The parabolic reflectors were made of plastic, and it was discovered, quite rapidly, that they (the plastic reflectors) melt rapidly and/or catch items on fire upon being exposed to sunlight. I've got video of a dumpster full of them burning. I know this because I just finished spending a month replacing said plastic domes with metal ones. expect fires.

      jaz

      --
      Life is what happens to you while you are busy making other plans. No-one sees motorcycles
    18. Re:Too much money to fix, thing outside the box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you sound like an ass. Why don't you give it a try first?

    19. Re:Too much money to fix, thing outside the box by catmistake · · Score: 1

      They should call out the Mythbusters. It looks like Archimede's death ray may have been vindicated.

      lt is already silently vindicated. What is solar-thermal energy other than an applied Archimedies Death Ray?

    20. Re:Too much money to fix, thing outside the box by jayme0227 · · Score: 1

      The Mythbusters didn't test the idea of light being focused to start fires. What they tested was the probability that this phenomenon could have been weaponized 2200+ years ago. While it was certainly possible, it was highly improbable.

      --
      But then I realized the cable was blue, so I only gave it one star. I hate blue.
  2. Runs to Vegas by UnknowingFool · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    with large jar of mutant ants. Ooh crap. The jar is broken. The mutant ants are free! And I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re:Runs to Vegas by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      with large jar of mutant ants. Ooh crap. The jar is broken. The mutant ants are free! And I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords

      I TOLD you that ant farm keyboard idea wouldn't work!

    2. Re:Runs to Vegas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hurumph!

  3. It's a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    They just haven't gotten around to installing the Sterling motors and generators yet.

    1. Re:It's a feature by RDW · · Score: 1

      'They just haven't gotten around to installing the Sterling motors and generators yet.'

      However, other applications of the technology can already be tested in this technically accurate simulation:

      http://www.bossmonster.com/games/antcity.html

  4. Post a warning? by crow · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wouldn't the simplest solution be to post a warning? They could set up an infrared camera to monitor where the hot spot is, and have a monitor displaying it, so people could avoid it.

    1. Re:Post a warning? by red_dragon · · Score: 5, Funny

      They could set up an infrared camera...

      Damn engineers and their overcomplicated solutions. Why can't people just look for where the smoke and smell of charred human flesh is coming from?

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
    2. Re:Post a warning? by krnpimpsta · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wouldn't the simplest solution be to post a warning?

      "Do not look into hotel with remaining eye."

      --

      New webcomic updated on Sundays: HERE

    3. Re:Post a warning? by TheCRAIGGERS · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Since the building is basically parabolic, won't the spot stay mostly stationary? I mean, isn't that the whole point of parabolic focusers?

      I say install a solar station at the location and let people charge their gadgets off it.

    4. Re:Post a warning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This isn't a tiny pool or hotel, this is Vegas pool party territory, where there are thousands of people at each massive pool. The pools cost over $60m each, just to gain entrance is $50/person. It's basically a big, very loud, drunken party in the midday sun.

    5. Re:Post a warning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WARNING: The hotel staff is dedicated to providing its patrons a safe and hospitable experience. In case of a situation where we cannot provide a safe and hospitable experience, we will warn our patrons of a possible hazardous condition. Standing here for to long will kill you; please try to avoid it.

      Or maybe they can keep it as a more passive-aggressive way of dealing with people who win too much money (like that ever happens):

      We would like to congratulate you on your enormous success at the roulette table. We are very, very, pleased with your success. Please stand here so we can start your victory candescence.

      Hey, only a few short months until Portal 2 comes out!

    6. Re:Post a warning? by vlm · · Score: 3, Informative

      Since the building is basically parabolic, won't the spot stay mostly stationary? I mean, isn't that the whole point of parabolic focusers?

      Try it some time and be surprised. Moving the sun with respect to the parabola is equivalent to moving the parabola with respect to the sun. And there is a strong microwave analogy. So, if the spot never moved, that would make radar systems rather hard to build (you'd have to use 80s era phased arrays instead of 40s era rotating dishes)

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    7. Re:Post a warning? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Since the building is basically parabolic, won't the spot stay mostly stationary?

      Obviously neither you nor the mod who gave you insightful read the article because had either of you done so, you would have read the following:

      Fixing the problem isn't going to be easy. As the Earth spins, the sun moves across the horizon. But as the seasons change, the angle of the Earth to the sun changes too, meaning shadows - and in this case the hot spot - move in a different way. Putting in one row of thick umbrellas won't solve the problem because each day they would have to be a few feet back or a few feet forward from their prior day's position.

      One doesn't even need a parabolic reflector to experience this. Go to any city during a clear, sunny day and you will find hot spots being created from the nice, shiny windows on the flat (non-curved) buildings. While not focused like the rays from this building, you will feel substantially warmer.

      However, stand still for a few minutes, and as the Earth rotates and moves about the sun, the hot spot will move with it.

      I'm not the most brilliant person when it comes to science, but even I know what you said is wrong!

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    8. Re:Post a warning? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Sounds like hell.

      (I hate heat.) (And I've been to Vegas in June - felt like I was in a giant concrete oven.)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    9. Re:Post a warning? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      P.S.

      However the TV show that's attached to the The Article looks pretty darn good. Can't complain about beautiful men and women, dancing around almost naked...... so long as I'm watching it from an air conditioned spot
      .

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    10. Re:Post a warning? by curunir · · Score: 1

      The simplest thing is to dull the reflective surfaces of the offending parts of the building. This problem isn't unique, it's happened before elsewhere.

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    11. Re:Post a warning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "won't the spot stay mostly stationary?"

      "Mostly" being the key word, but not enough where a charging station would be practical. The focus point would still drift.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coma_(optics)

    12. Re:Post a warning? by commodore64_love · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Here's a warning:

      Don't RTFA. Websites that force you to load videos are obnoxious, especially for those of us who have slow connections (or are downloading in the background).

      At the very least, have an automated question asking, "Would you like to load this video?" so I and others can click "no"

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    13. Re:Post a warning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      He's closer to being right than you might think.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parabolic_reflector

      It's mostly because the building isn't angled at the sun and isn't a perfect parabolic curve that the hotspot moves around.

    14. Re:Post a warning? by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      Death ray? More like a thermal discouragement beam!

    15. Re:Post a warning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See spot run. See spot burn.

    16. Re:Post a warning? by TheCRAIGGERS · · Score: 1

      He's closer to being right than you might think.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parabolic_reflector

      It's mostly because the building isn't angled at the sun and isn't a perfect parabolic curve that the hotspot moves around.

      Guess I didn't think about it not being a perfect curve and how it would effect the focus from a ways away.

      Thanks for being informative. =)

    17. Re:Post a warning? by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Depends on your definition of beauty.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    18. Re:Post a warning? by HereIAmJH · · Score: 2, Informative

      And the video I got, all 20m of it, was about Las Vegas pool parties being the new trend. It didn't even mention the Death Ray.

      --
      Another day, another update to a Google android app.
    19. Re:Post a warning? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      It didn't download a video for me. But then, I've got NoScript and RequestPolicy installed.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    20. Re:Post a warning? by laejoh · · Score: 1

      A warning such as "don't look at the hotel with the remaining eye?"

    21. Re:Post a warning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why can't people just look for where the smoke and smell of charred human flesh is coming from?

      That's just the tourist group from Berlin.

    22. Re:Post a warning? by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      Depends on your definition of beauty.

      That thread's 'bout three articles over.

    23. Re:Post a warning? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      They could set up an infrared camera to monitor where the hot spot is, and have a monitor displaying it, so people could avoid it.

      Exactly, that way everyone in the hotel will know where it is. That doesn't help the girl who's sunbathing very much, though.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    24. Re:Post a warning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone really give a shit that you're running stuff that just so happens to block content? No. This is slashdot. Get over yourself.

    25. Re:Post a warning? by Facegarden · · Score: 3, Informative

      The simplest thing is to dull the reflective surfaces of the offending parts of the building. This problem isn't unique, it's happened before elsewhere.

      They did that. When they designed it, they thought of this and added a film over the windows that reduces reflected energy by 70%, according to TFA.

      It still manages to raise temperatures by 20-30 degrees in the affected zone, and on a 110 degree day thats enough to melt plastics and people.
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    26. Re:Post a warning? by Altus · · Score: 1

      No, Ive been to that party and it was nothing like Vegas.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    27. Re:Post a warning? by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

      This isn't a tiny pool or hotel, this is Vegas pool party territory, where there are thousands of people at each massive pool. The pools cost over $60m each, just to gain entrance is $50/person. It's basically a big, very loud, drunken party in the midday sun.

      They missed a fantastic opportunity here, they could have used the ray to heat the pool !

      --
      music lover since 1969
    28. Re:Post a warning? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Ummm...I see where you are coming from, but I don't think your analogy is quite accurate. Moving the sun with respect to the parabola is equivalent to moving the parabola with respect to the sun if you are talking about whether or not you will still have a focal point regardless of where your radiant source is. Moving the sun with respect to the parabola is NOT equivalent to moving the parabola with respect to the sun when you are talking about where the afore-mentioned focal point will be located in reference to the parabola.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    29. Re:Post a warning? by khallow · · Score: 1

      It's mostly because the building isn't angled at the sun and isn't a perfect parabolic curve that the hotspot moves around.

      Sorry, the building is stationary and the Sun moves, hence, the hotspot moves around. It's irrelevant whether the building is a perfect parabolic surface or not.

    30. Re:Post a warning? by hackerjoe · · Score: 1

      GP is actually partly correct though, the spot is staying relatively still side-to-side, so with respect to the direction that the building is parabolically shaped it's stationary; the article is just saying the spot is moving back and forth because the building is vertically flat.

    31. Re:Post a warning? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Or have a spotting laser slaved to the hot spot so folks could see where it was.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    32. Re:Post a warning? by imrec · · Score: 1

      Took me 5 minutes to gain control long enough to post this. *sniff* You made my week.

      --
      Note: This sig contains nine S's, nine I's and five O's which... means absolutely nothing.
    33. Re:Post a warning? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      The hotel is both a solar oven and a sundial. They should redevelop the field of fire (so to speak) to show the date and time when the focus will be on certain areas. Should be quite educational.

    34. Re:Post a warning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not the most brilliant person when it comes to science, but even I know what you said is wrong!

      Actually, you're missing the point. A parabolic reflector has the special property that no matter what angle of light you shine at it, the light ALWAYS comes out along a trajectory parallel to the axis of the dish and ALWAYS passes through a special point known as the focus of the parabola. This is part of how satellite dishes work--because they are parabolic (in the mathematically precise sense of the word), the signal from the satellite is guaranteed to be funelled into the collector at the focus of the parabola. If it didn't work this way, then you couldn't get satellite TV since the chance that your dish is pointed EXACTLY at a satellite 100 miles away is essentially 0.

      If the building were in fact a perfect parabola, then the OP would be correct--the hottest spot of all (the focus of the parabola) would be independent of the angle of light hitting the dish. In practice, however, the building is certainly not a mathematically precise parabola and thus the focus will indeed move with angle of incidence (ie, with the sun).

    35. Re:Post a warning? by rbayer · · Score: 1

      Moving the sun with respect to the parabola is equivalent to moving the parabola with respect to the sun.

      No, it's not. Moving the sun with respect to the parabola and surrounding sidewalks is the same as moving the parabola AND SURROUNDING SIDEWALKS with respect to the sun. One of the beautiful things about parabolic reflectors is that regardless of what angle of light you shine at them, the light ALWAYS comes out parallel to the axis of the parabola. Always.

    36. Re:Post a warning? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Actually, after reviewing it a bit, I think I may have been wrong when I posted earlier.

      A parabola will concentrate rays that arrive *nearly parallel and normal to the directrix* on the focus. Alternatively, any light/heat/sound/whatever source that is shining from the focus will be reflected off the parabola into nearly parallel (and normal to the directrix) rays. However, rays coming in at extreme angles will *not* be concentrated at the focus. Consequently, I think that as the sun moves above the hotel, the hot spot would move as well. My apologies to vlm; he was right.

      I think you are right, too...it would be quite interesting to see how the suns rays are focused on different areas of the pool and courtyard. Not to mention, I'd be rather unhappy if the hotel knew that this was happening, but never bothered to alert me to the fact and I was burned as a result.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    37. Re:Post a warning? by pimproot · · Score: 1

      Since the only case where a parabola fixes the focus is when the incoming rays are parallel to its axis (meaning the sun could only move toward and away from the face of the building), this makes the original poster's distance from being right more in the range of "hardly at all".

      In fact, rays that are not parallel to the axis don't even converge into a focal point:

      http://users.dickinson.edu/~richesod/focalpoint/

      Sheesh, around here it seems like people think "parabolic dish" means "magic focus-maker".

    38. Re:Post a warning? by pimproot · · Score: 1

      So mind-numbingly wrong. Why do you think satellite dishes must be painstakingly aimed in the proper direction? Try listening through a parabolic amplifier (those dishes spies use) and see how quickly the volume drops off if you point it off the mark. You'd think more parabolas would show up in nature if they had the magical focus-making properties you think they do. I somewhat suspect you also meant your two ALWAYS assertions in a way that's mutually contradictory.

      So, please meditate on this applet:
      http://users.dickinson.edu/~richesod/focalpoint/

    39. Re:Post a warning? by phoenixwade · · Score: 1

      Why can't people just look for where the smoke and smell of charred human flesh is coming from?

      That's just the tourist group from Berlin.

      Or the traveling performance artists from India.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    40. Re:Post a warning? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Beauty (physical)

        - thin
      - younger than 30 (although there are exceptions)
      - female

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    41. Re:Post a warning? by jefe7777 · · Score: 1

      If we're talking about a parabolic dish designed with a single focus point, and the shape of the dish can't be changed/morphed, then no, the focus point will not move relative to the dish. And as the energy source and/or dish move relative to each other, the amount of energy being focused on that single point will fall off from it's peak.

      If the the reflector has multiple focus points, these multiple focus points will also not move relative to the surface (again assuming the reflector's surface cannot be changed/morphed/warped). But as the energy source and reflector move relative to each other, then the peak focused energy could move from focus point to focus point.

      The focus point(s) can be sharp or diffuse.

      They can't move relative to the reflector, unless the surface shape can distort or change.

      j

    42. Re:Post a warning? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      One of the beautiful things about parabolic reflectors is that regardless of what angle of light you shine at them, the light ALWAYS comes out parallel to the axis of the parabola. Always.

      What is this I see in your future? Is it possibly a re-sit of your 16+geometry exam? Or Optics 1.0.2?

      Parabolas have some interesting properties, but that's not one of them.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    43. Re:Post a warning? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      They could set up an infrared camera to monitor where the hot spot is,

      Thermochromic paint on the pavement.

      and have a monitor displaying it, so people could avoid it.

      ^W^W play "chicken" by walking through the hot spot increasingly slowly, covered in black paint, etc, etc.

      I know this is SlashDot, so not understanding basic human nature is to be expected and applauded to a degree, but you're maybe just a little more ignorant of human nature than is good for you.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    44. Re:Post a warning? by vlm · · Score: 1

      Ummm...I see where you are coming from, but I don't think your analogy is quite accurate.

      How bout the standard slashdot car analogy... if the original (wrong) interpretation were correct, then the cop would not need to "point" the radar gun at your car, since everything that hits the dish would come into the focus.

      Now with my luck someone will point out that cops radar guns use high gain horn antennas. So use an airport radar tower vs the airplane situation. Which unfortunately is not a car analogy.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    45. Re:Post a warning? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      I figured it out a little later, and posted a reply to someone else's reply to my post. You were right; my understanding of parabolas needed to be refreshed :)

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    46. Re:Post a warning? by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      ... When they designed it, they thought of this and added a film over the windows that reduces reflected energy by 70%, according to TFA.

      It still manages to raise temperatures by 20-30 degrees in the affected zone, and on a 110 degree day thats enough to melt plastics and people.
      -Taylor

      So imagine what happens when some fool replaces the windows, and leaves out the film to save cost! 3 times as hot??

  5. Images by cosm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Interesting story. Dumbass images. Besides the burned newspaper bag and perhaps one obscure image of the parabolic hotel in question, every other image is just scenery or people partying in a pool. The fact that there are so many of them on the ABC website touts the true journalistic intent (or perhaps marketing, scantily clad women abound).

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    1. Re:Images by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      This looks like a good one:

      http://www.cherlasvegas.net/images/las-vegas-hotels-vdara.jpg

      Shows the curvature of the hotel along with the location of the pool.

    2. Re:Images by webminer · · Score: 1

      Hey, what do you have against scantily clad women? They are part of what makes life fun!

    3. Re:Images by Brucelet · · Score: 1

      link returns a 404 for me

    4. Re:Images by RDW · · Score: 5, Informative

      The article they probably got this story from is a bit more informative - complete with diagram!:

      http://www.lvrj.com/news/vdara-visitor---death-ray--scorched-hair-103777559.html

    5. Re:Images by afidel · · Score: 1

      Because they have a webmaster that knows how to use .htaccess, go to the main page then paste the image URL so your referrer is their site instead of slashdot.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    6. Re:Images by Nadaka · · Score: 2, Funny

      Damn you, now I am going to have to read the article.

    7. Re:Images by oldmac31310 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indeed. The embedded video had nothing to do with the story and made no mention whatsoever of the 'death ray' phenomenon supposedly exhibited by the hotel. And they didn't even have a NSFW tag anywhere. There I was waiting for something about the death ray hotel and all I got was a flood of images of drunken assholes jumping up and down in hotel pools. Crap story.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    8. Re:Images by PRMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nice job. Now Slashdot is going to get sued by Righthaven media for linking to the LVRJ.

      http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100928/16212911200/eff-comes-out-guns-blazing-in-countersuit-against-righthaven-stepens-media.shtml

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    9. Re:Images by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, what do you have against scantily clad women? They are part of what makes life fun!

      The part that the fun they're having is not with me. Ever. I'm a giant walking bag of awkward when it comes to scantily clad women.

    10. Re:Images by JourneymanMereel · · Score: 1

      Don't even have to do that... just paste it instead of click on it. Or click on it and then go up to the address bar and hit enter.

      --
      Life has many choices. Eternity has two. What's yours?
    11. Re:Images by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      go to the main page then paste the image URL so your referrer is their site instead of slashdot

      Actually, its a blank referrer.

      Usually sites don’t block requests that have blank referrers, though. Only third-party referrers...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    12. Re:Images by ZaskarX · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute...laser death rays AND scantily clad women? Vegas might be worth visiting after all.

  6. They anticipated it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What makes it unnerving is that they anticipated the problem and coated the windows with a layer which is supposed to reduce the effect by 70%, but they still built a concentrator mirror...

  7. Map view by eamonman · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://goo.gl/maps/ZpTd

    So it looks like if the sun is high up in the sky, from probably a S or SSE angle, you'd get some good ant burning action..

    So how would they fix that? Put up one of those porous billboard/shade deals that Flamingo does?

    --
    0- Eamonman Proud member of DNRC
    1. Re:Map view by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      The easiest way would be to dull the surfaces so they don't reflect as much light. Paint of a different color, perhaps some sort of UV screen shade, perhaps some sort of POV panel film and of course texturing the surface with something like this(which qualifies as PVO film) or anything else would break it up too.

        All you need to do is absorb some of the light or reflect is elsewhere before it focuses.

    2. Re:Map view by HereIAmJH · · Score: 1

      The easiest way would be to dull the surfaces so they don't reflect as much light.

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't that energy have to go some place? They mentioned using low-e glass in the building, I would think that would increase the reflection on the pool. And dulling the surface or using a darker color would transfer more heat into the building. Something you really don't want in Vegas.

      Other than moving the pool or changing the shape of the building, it seems that their only real option is putting something between the pool and the building. Thus the larger, heavier umbrellas.

      --
      Another day, another update to a Google android app.
    3. Re:Map view by thwack328 · · Score: 1

      Just re-mount most of the windows slightly shimmed to a random angle. Besides scattering the reflected sunlight, the building's reflection of the neighborhood would look sweet!

    4. Re:Map view by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Paint of a different color, perhaps some sort of UV screen shade, perhaps some sort of POV panel film and of course texturing the surface

      You know, I'm not sure if painting or texturing the windows is going to have the effect this luxury hotel desires. They already have a film that absorbs or scatters 70% of the light, so they need something better than that. Maybe they could angle all of the window panes a couple degrees to different directions. I'm sure that would be cheap, right? .. right?

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    5. Re:Map view by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Your right in that the heat would have to go somewhere. But moving the heat to a confined area has the benefit of being able to do something with it. In other words, while it wouldn't be ideal to move the heat into the building, they could pump it back out to a safer location with increased air conditioning. For the life span of buildings in Vegas (20-50 years as they are often tore down and replaced for the sake of appearances), it might be cheaper/cost effective to absorb the extra energy costs then replace the building or mare the view from the rooms.

    6. Re:Map view by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      A textured surface would somewhat scatter the reflecting light and not bring it to as sharp of a focus as it is currently. This would allow the heat to dissipate somewhat while not building up in the same spot as it interacts with more surface area. Changing the angle of the windows would have a simular effect.

      As for painting, it would need to be a dark color to absorb most of the light. Their scattering effect on the film is probably defeated with the parabolic shape of the building. It would eventually either dissipate on it's path or end up in the same focal space if the refraction or reflection is scattered to another point in the building. Think of texture that basically inverts the parabolic shape that can defeat the actual shape of the building. Perhaps some ledges that protrude between the windows blocking some of the reflection from hitting other parts of the building.

    7. Re:Map view by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      A textured surface would somewhat scatter the reflecting light and not bring it to as sharp of a focus as it is currently.

      As for painting, it would need to be a dark color to absorb most of the light.

      How many luxury hotels have you stayed in that had sandblasted or blacked-out windows? This is a hotel we're talking about, you still need to be able to see out of the glass. It's your window. Onto the world, as it were.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    8. Re:Map view by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      I'd just close the pool during the brief period of the day that it's a problem.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    9. Re:Map view by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      You don't have to black out the windows completely. and the windows are taller then the person inside so texturing or painting just the top halves could likely do the job and still leave you with a pool side view.

  8. The fix is by topham · · Score: 1

    The fix is to rotate the windows a few degrees to remove any convergence. The possible damage from this phenomenon is significant: increased chance of skin cancer; burned retinas; severe skin burns; fire; etc.

    1. Re:The fix is by sconeu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You forgot what is the most important thing from the hotel's POV.

      Significantly increased chance of lawsuit.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  9. Or rent it out by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Funny
    They could rent it out to a couple of boys to raise cattle.

    After all, your beginners science class taught that "focus" is where the sons raise meat.

    1. Re:Or rent it out by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That was a very mature pun, I can tell because it was fully groan.

      --
      Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
    2. Re:Or rent it out by ffreeloader · · Score: 1

      Since when do puns get modded insightful? Are /. mods such poor spellers that they don't know the difference between groan and grown?

      --
      "while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude." de Tocqueville
    3. Re:Or rent it out by AkkarAnadyr · · Score: 1

      No, they just appreciate puns differently than wouche bags do.

      --

      I bought this house and you know I'm boss
      Ain't no h'aint gonna run me off

    4. Re:Or rent it out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't want to hear about young boys' meat raising

  10. tan now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least you can get your tan on fast. Cancer even faster!

  11. Death Ray.. {sigh} by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "Death Ray" title is a bit dramatic. Ok it gets hot. Ok, you shouldn't stand under focused light in the middle of the desert. By the title, it sounds like it will vaporize you. It doesn't even get hot enough to make the pool water boil.

        Just wait til we set up the metallized boPET reflectors. That'll make for a good death ray!

       

  12. Fix it? That's not what I read... by jandrese · · Score: 1

    The end of the article basically has an employee going "maybe we could get some plants to put in there or something", that doesn't sound like fixing it to me.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  13. Not much of a death ray... by Ender+Wiggin+77 · · Score: 1

    frag count is still zero.

  14. Disney Concert Hall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The Disney Concert Hall in LA used to have a similar problem. Part of the building was covered in mirror finish stainless steel panels (most of the surface had rough surfaced panels). At certain times, the curved surface would focus the sun onto a building across the street, raising the temperature in some rooms. The fix was to roughen up the mirror finish.

  15. Same thing in the old Lucent building at Chicago by Magnus+Pym · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The architect thought it would be cool to have a massive dish-like glass structure on the side of the building, shaped like an enormous microwave antenna. Unfortunately, the thing focused the suns rays like a magnifying glass. The insides got really hot, especially near the security desk! Dont' know if anyone got burned, though.

  16. Re:PLEASE GO AWAY IDLE by Ultra64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because it's just soooo hard to scroll past it without clicking on it. Right?

  17. Death Ray in Hotel Vader ? by martyw · · Score: 1

    It's a codeword! Everybody knows dark siders run Vegas.

  18. Walt Disney Concert Hall by Chris_Stankowitz · · Score: 1

    Walt Disney Concert Hall had a very similar problem and was solved by sandblasting the the side to dull the reflection...

    Search for: Microclimatic Impact: Glare around the Walt Disney Concert Hall

  19. One pun over the edge by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Alright... that's it, that pun has to be paid for in blood...everybody dies.... I mean "Come on everyone, I'm taking you all to Vegas"

  20. This happened in CA by geekoid · · Score: 1

    The focal area would get hot enough to melt traffic cones an the free way.

    I drove through it once, and temperature in my car became uncomfortable. I don't know what would happen had I beens stopped in traffic.

    They eventualy brushed the surface.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  21. Re:PLEASE GO AWAY IDLE by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

    Yeah, because you know whining in a random idle story is going to accomplish so much. If there is a site bug, why don't, you know, report it? Instead of being a total whiny douchebag?

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  22. Re:Death ray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's not a euphemism, it describes exactly what it is. 'Death ray' on the other hand is a dysphemism, coined by bad journalism.

  23. I've heard of this before. by zero_out · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There was a news story several years ago about a fire that destroyed a family's patio, and damaged their house. The fire department couldn't figure out how it started, but then they discovered the dog's glass water bowl about ten feet from where the fire started. They tested their theory, and sure enough, the owners were filling the glass bowl with water at just the right time, and putting it in just the right place, that it magnified the afternoon sunlight into a spot that set fire to weather-treated wood boards.

    1. Re:I've heard of this before. by Pointy_Hair · · Score: 1

      This has happened in the Atlanta, GA. area. Apparently a builder of cluster homes had oriented a few just the right way so that the sun would reflect and focus off the windows of one house and melt the vinyl siding on the adjacent one. There were about 4-5 homes like this in the subdivision IIRC. Big debate with the stupid builder doing many warranty repairs on the siding of house B but refusing to do anything with the windows on house A. What a maroon.

    2. Re:I've heard of this before. by Threni · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I've been to Atlanta, and let me tell you - burning's too good for it! What do people do there? It's just roads and shopping malls. Downtown is too scary - it seems to be entirely peopled with black drug addicts and crazy people. This was after we'd been told to avoid the area by literally everyone we met. "It can't be that bad", we thought. It took less than 1 minute before we rolled up the windows and checked the doors of our car were locked, and less than 10 more before we decided to leave, never to return.

    3. Re:I've heard of this before. by dcam · · Score: 1

      My mother has a glass hedgehog on her desk, basically a clear glass ball.

      There are little burn marks all over the desk from where the sun has hit it.

      --
      meh
    4. Re:I've heard of this before. by aug24 · · Score: 1

      There was a fire here (UK) some time ago that was eventually traced to a crystal ball on a windowsill. Curtains caught fire when the sun was out at just the right height that spring.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  24. Same thing happened at Walt Disney Concert Hall by default+luser · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is hardly a unique event. If you let an architect go nuts trying to make a "modern" and "unique" building, he will inevitably build a magnifying glass.

    Architects are rarely versed in function, and are almost always about the form.

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.

    1. Re:Same thing happened at Walt Disney Concert Hall by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      Architects are rarely versed in function, and are almost always about the form.

      My sample size is small, but all three architects I know were required to take a statics class and do load calculations before they got their degrees. This wasn't sufficient for doing engineering for building design, and wasn't intended as such, but they were required to know enough to not hand engineers unbuildable designs.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    2. Re:Same thing happened at Walt Disney Concert Hall by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      And it's not limited to buildings. Along a nearby highway, glass screens were placed as a sound barrier. The angle of the screens is such that at certain times of day, the sun is reflected right into the motorists' eyes.

    3. Re:Same thing happened at Walt Disney Concert Hall by blair1q · · Score: 1

      but they were required to know enough to not hand engineers a raft of shit for kicking back their unbuildable designs.

      i made that better for you.

    4. Re:Same thing happened at Walt Disney Concert Hall by default+luser · · Score: 1

      they were required to know enough to not hand engineers unbuildable designs.

      Unbuildable designs and designs that sacrifice function for form are two entirely different problems. The former will get you fired, while the latter can be spun as "art," depending on who you are and what you're building.

      Architects make all these buildings with strange forms without taking into consideration things like solar effects, the climate around the building, and cost of maintenance. Cities flock to these idiots because they're guaranteed media attention every time the architect's name is dropped, so the system feeds on itself.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    5. Re:Same thing happened at Walt Disney Concert Hall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I took that class too. It's the one where nothing moves, or if it does move you ignore friction, ignore wind resistance, all joints are perfectly rigid, all materials are completely uniform. It's pretty much the programming equivalent of writing hello world in Visual Basic, and then claiming you are an embedded software engineer.

    6. Re:Same thing happened at Walt Disney Concert Hall by theIsovist · · Score: 4, Informative

      You've given one example, which is a building by Frank Gehry. He's an architect who made his millions by converting software made to develop jet fighters into "architecture". Is it any wonder his buildings attack people?

      I am a practicing architect, so please, let me fill you in. Architects take classes on sun angles and reflected light. Understanding how to make use of and control natural sunlight is a major part of modern architecture. I counter your example with a modern building designed by Steven Holl (a much more impressive architect IMHO). If you note on one of the diagrams, the building has been designed to strategicly filter light into different areas of the school based on certain landmark days. No death rays here.

    7. Re:Same thing happened at Walt Disney Concert Hall by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It's a start anyway so long as they are made aware that other factors exist. It reminds me of something said in a Finite Element Analysis textbook or lecture I encountered some time ago:
      "Assume that you have a smooth massless spherical elephant but keep in mind that real elephants are big, heavy, hairy and a complex shape. Sometimes you'll need to adjust your model."

  25. Science, yo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you need to perform science on it, you better hurry

    Quick!Can anyone here perform science? We need some science ASAP!

    1. Re:Science, yo! by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Have Adam Savage deliver those lines and I think you would have an awesome viral video...

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  26. Re:Death ray by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is not Orwellian. It in no way implies the opposite effect. It is the more correct term. It in no way is destructive to the welfare of anyone. If it was killing dozens of people, you might have a point.well, you wouldn't then either. Unless they where removing all references to the deaths of others from all media.

    That said, the Hotel is missing a golden opportunity.

    Every knows it's no actually a death ray, but they could hype it up and do a tongue and cheek promotion.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  27. What Happens In Vegas by mattwrock · · Score: 2, Funny

    apparently leaves a mark!

    --
    "Ones and zeros were everywhere. I even think I saw a two!" - Bender
  28. Architecture fail by pckl300 · · Score: 1

    Why would they design a parabolic concave building? This is a huge architecture fail.

    --
    In the beginning, there was null.
    1. Re:Architecture fail by vlm · · Score: 1

      Why would they design a parabolic concave building? This is a huge architecture fail.

      Well, convex ones are invariably going to be compared to female body parts, which probably embarrasses architects, so...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Architecture fail by PatPending · · Score: 1

      Why would they design a parabolic concave building? This is a huge architecture fail.

      (Emphasis added.)

      Heh. Almost as bad as your tautology fail.

      --
      What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
    3. Re:Architecture fail by pckl300 · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, but they should at least do the math to make sure their giant lens doesn't converge the sun anywhere on their own property.

      --
      In the beginning, there was null.
    4. Re:Architecture fail by pckl300 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I realized that shortly after hitting 'submit'

      --
      In the beginning, there was null.
    5. Re:Architecture fail by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      He did indeed fail at tautologies, because he neglected to include one.

      A parabola is a just a mathematical curve. Whether it's concave or not largely depends on where you're standing.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:Architecture fail by PatPending · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I realized that shortly after hitting 'submit'

      He did indeed fail at tautologies, because he neglected to include one. A parabola is a just a mathematical curve. Whether it's concave or not largely depends on where you're standing.

      Yeah, I realized that shortly after hitting 'submit

      --
      What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
  29. This is not the first time.. by pablo_max · · Score: 1

    Actually the Walt Disney Concert hall had a similar issue when they built it. It would direct the heat into cars at the stop lights and cause the people to get way too hot. Of course, it didnt melt plastic, but still!
    They needed to scuff the finish a bit to kill the effect .

  30. I accidentally a Death Ray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that dangerous?

  31. Publicity Stunt? by djdevon3 · · Score: 1

    Pics or it didn't happen. I can't find any images or video of this so-called hotspot. ABC has some video but it might as well be a 5 minute long promotion of the hotel with no mention of the event written in the article next to it. In the video a party promoter says something like "anything to get revenue into the hotel". I'm thinking this might just be a publicity stunt.

    1. Re:Publicity Stunt? by MDMurphy · · Score: 1

      The hotel seems to still be under construction:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:DeathStar2.jpg

  32. Truth is stranger than fiction by Veritech_Ace · · Score: 1

    In the upcoming game Fallout: New Vegas, I believe that a heliostat-like death ray is available to the player. Who knew that Real Life: Now Vegas already had this?

  33. Not My Job by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

    That reminds me of the Wait Wait... Don't Tell Me! "Not My Job" interview/quiz with the Magliozzi brothers (AKA "Click & Clack", AKA "The Car Talk guys"). One of the questions they answered was of a similar mirror sculpture in Britain that some meteorologists warned would kill birds by focusing sunlight on them. The Vegas hotel could draw upon the subsequent banter and rename the place "Click & Clack's Place of Whatever Flies By".

    <plug type="gratuitous">Just one more reason to listen to public radio.</plug>

    --
    "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
  34. Similarly by dorpus · · Score: 1

    Fish bowls or glass vases placed next to windows can spontaneously start fires.

    1. Re:Similarly by laejoh · · Score: 1

      Drummers as well I gather from a Spinal Tap rockumentary.

  35. Make focus point a moving sidewalk by markdowling · · Score: 1

    If you're stupid enough to want to be there, you're going to have to put some effort into it.

  36. Double fail by formfeed · · Score: 1

    For once there are direct consequences for modern Architectures obsession with full glass facades. But the other fail is of course putting a glass box in the desert

  37. why do you think the builder is a maroon? (sic) by Chirs · · Score: 1

    I'm curious why you think the builder should be doing anything to the windows? Arguably this is either a problem with the manufacturer of the windows (deforming and causing a focussing effect) or else with the vinyl siding (being unable to handle reflections).

    The only real solutions are to replace the windows with ones that don't cause the focussing effect, or else to use siding that's more durable (but more expensive) than vinyl.

    1. Re:why do you think the builder is a maroon? (sic) by oldmac31310 · · Score: 0

      I'm sure that should they read them, Maroons will resent your remarks. Morons on the other hand will probably not understand them.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
  38. Hooray! by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 3, Funny

    S'mores for everyone!

    1. Re:Hooray! by RebootKid · · Score: 1

      Oh for mod points.

    2. Re:Hooray! by Silent+Objection · · Score: 1

      Didn't your parents ever teach you not to play in the death ray?

  39. The BP building in Anchorage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The BP building in Anchorage had the same problem in the mid-1970s. Or maybe it was the ARCO building. Anyway, reflective glass in a multi-story building with a curved facade. Seemed to focus on the sidewalk across the street - where it got way too warm on sunny days.

  40. Disney Theater Redux by Flector · · Score: 0

    The exact thing same happened when the Disney Theater opened in LA, which is nothing but a series of shiny curves.

  41. Numb3rs? by rjejr · · Score: 1

    I think the smart brother on Numb3rs already solved this a few seasons back.

  42. The Bacon Bakin' Beacon by djdanlib · · Score: 1

    Sounds like they found an environmentally friendly way to cook bacon. Just stick it on the pool deck and wait! Side effects may include cooking the chef.

    Seriously though, this was probably done deliberately by some architect, who is now cackling with glee over the massive parabolic dish. This would be rather difficult to call an accidental design flaw.

  43. Do they keep by SnarfQuest · · Score: 0

    Do they keep sharks in the pool?

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  44. You expect me to talk? by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

    No, mister Bond, I expect you to die!

  45. Rejected marketing slogan... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2, Funny

    What lies in Vegas, fries in Vegas.

    1. Re:Rejected marketing slogan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When people lay together in Vegas, they have a good chance of developing an uncomfortable burning sensation.

  46. Tattoo You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get your solar imprinted Tramp Stamps here while you relax by the pool and sip your cocktail.

  47. It's not a bug, it's a feature by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

    Their stated plan of getting plants and umbrellas will just result in burned dead plants and flaming umbrellas with holes. I suspect the only practical way to deal with this will be to install metal screens on posts to block the focused rays. Of course, anyone walking between the rays and (near) the blocking screen will get zapped. Alternatively, the hotel should charge extra and say "This is not a bug! It's a feature! We offer SuperQuickTan tm, the only place you can get tanned in 0.1 second! However, if you're already tanned or you're an ethnic minority, DO NOT USE this service."

    1. Re:It's not a bug, it's a feature by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      If they could afford the water (I know supply is short in Nevada) they could build a fountain to project water into the path of the beam. The effect should be spectacular, and a lot of the light would be either diffused or absorbed.

  48. Mythbusters by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    Someone tell the Mythbusters, they tried to build something like that once.

  49. My House by AmericanInKiev · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I have melted vinyl siding on my own house from the sliding glass door.
    it turns out that two panes of glass with a "vacuum" between makes a kind of curved mirror.

    Architects should know this stuff.

  50. Fishbowls, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One afternoon while working from home I noticed a weird haze near one of our bookshelves. As I walked over to investigate I smelled smoke, which I discovered was emanating from a well-focused image of the sun reflecting from the wood shelf holding a fishbowl. I'm not sure if it would have gotten hot enough to fully ignite; experiments starting fires with a magnifying glass as a Boy Scout taught me that singeing wood is far easier than igniting it. Needless to say, though, the fishbowl was relocated immediately, and I was happy that someone was working from home that day.

    I suspect we'd never noticed this effect before because the fishbowl was placed on the shelf during the summer, when the sun is much higher in the sky. The fishbowl incident occurred in early October, when the sun's apparent mid-day altitude changes almost noticeably from day to day.

  51. Hotels in Space by Cyclloid · · Score: 3, Funny

    In order to circumvent the treaty to not weaponize space, the USA plans to build "Hotels" in space.

  52. WTF is with Google Earth plugin installer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unrelated to the story here...

    When I went to the link above I received a message that I needed to install Google Earth Plugin to view 3D maps. I was OK with installing it but what surprised me was that when I clicked the button thinking I would get either a firefox dialog asking if I want to install the plugin or a standard file download dialog asking if I wanted to open, save, run etc. it immediately started a windows installer app! Is there someone that could help me understand how that was possible? I'd really like to disable functionality that runs windows installers from a web page button with no confirmation.

  53. Whoa by punapea · · Score: 1

    Imagine the amazing tan...

    --
    Death comes to those who wait.
  54. Sharks with lasers by dhyanesh · · Score: 1

    Now they just need sharks with lasers in the pool ...

  55. Magic by Pro923 · · Score: 1

    Damn, I thought it was just the magic of Vegas that was lighting my cigarettes spontaneously

  56. What a rediculous name, Vdara by laejoh · · Score: 1

    They should rename the hotel into Hotel Trogdor!

    1. Re:What a rediculous name, Vdara by laejoh · · Score: 0, Redundant

      On a dark desert highway, cool wind in my hair

      Warm smell of Thatched-roof cottages, rising up through the air

      Thatched-roof cottages!

      Thatched-roof cottages!

  57. They did exactly that!! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Read the whole article - the "solution" is to put in a small forest of very thick umbrellas! No joke, they are not touching the windows at all!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:They did exactly that!! by plover · · Score: 2, Funny

      Read the whole article - the "solution" is to put in a small forest of very thick umbrellas! No joke, they are not touching the windows at all!

      Well, this certainly isn't the first time someone has tried to fix architectural flaws in windows with a patch that's nothing more than a coverup.

      --
      John
  58. not really fixing it by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    According to the last paragraph of TFA, the "fix" is to put additional umbrellas and plants in the area to provide shade. So the effect should still be demonstrable, but executive's toupes will be less likely to burst into flames.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  59. Related, possibly a solution by TheHawke · · Score: 1

    At a bank, they put in gold-tinted reflective panels as exterior decoration. Shortly afterward they realized that the reflection was roasting their vehicles. So they called in a contractor and they lightly blasted the panels, making them opaque. I forgot what material they used, probably something soft to keep from knocking too much of the gold coating off, just to soften the mirror finish.

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  60. Mr Obvious by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    FTA: "It was as bright as outside," said Pintas, a Chicago lawyer

    Does that count as a thing that make you go "hmmm?"

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  61. Pool side BBQ? by NetNed · · Score: 1

    Couldn't they just pinpoint the area, put some sort of device that concentrates it to cook some steaks?

    "Come and enjoy our aged kobe beef, seared to perfection by the deadly rays of our parabolic hotel in a pool side setting."

  62. Magnifying Glass & Paper on sidewalk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems to be much like what many boys learned about igniting papers with a magnifying glass. Doesn't even have to be a hot summer day, just good bright sunshine in the midday.

  63. afternoons of bright sunlight by xrayspx · · Score: 1

    Luckily in Vega$, that's almost never going to be a problem.

  64. Aldar Headquarters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although it doesn't actually cause a problem, I think someone had a sense of humor when they designed the Aldar Headquarters building. A glass building shaped like a giant convex lens in the desert. What could possibly go wrong?

  65. This was the subject of an old sci fi short story by pjwhite · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember reading a story many years ago which was probably published in the late 1950s or 1960s. It was about an architect who murdered a rival by designing and having built a skyscraper with reflective widows controlled by a computer, ostensibly to maintain the interior environment of the building, but in reality as a way to focus the light of the sun on the rival's house, some miles away. The rival and his house were destroyed by a "mysterious" fire.
    I wish I could remember the name of the author and the the story title.

  66. Blasted minions! by Translation+Error · · Score: 1

    They mixed up the hotel plans and the death ray plans again!

    --
    When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
  67. video by ChienAndalu · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who clicked the video and realized that it wasn't about the death ray two minutes into it?

  68. Re:Fix it? That's not what I read... by ebuck · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a good fix to me. Plants have been absorbing the sun's rays for millennium, and they take up sufficient space that a patron won't be able to displace the plant. Of course, you might need to plant quite a few plants to handle migration of the focal point, but that's a lot cheaper than attempting to redesign / retrofit the building.

  69. Re:PLEASE GO AWAY IDLE by Leebert · · Score: 1

    I just want the comments section to actually WORK in idle. Like, actually expand a comment when I click it instead of reloading the page with only that comment.

  70. Re:PLEASE GO AWAY IDLE by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    Take “idle.” out of the URL and reload the page. It’s a pain in the ass but it works.

    I also occasionally use that trick on other subsections of Slashdot whose colour schemes I don’t like (too hard to tell the difference between read and unread posts).

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  71. Re:PLEASE GO AWAY IDLE by Leebert · · Score: 1

    Take “idle.” out of the URL and reload the page. It’s a pain in the ass but it works.

    That used to work for me, but now it always redirects to idle.

    This may be a little crazy, but it's almost as if the /. "editors" don't actually *read* the site. !!!

  72. Re:PLEASE GO AWAY IDLE by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    Really? It still works for me.

    http://slashdot.org/story/10/09/29/1622250/Las-Vegas-Hotel-Vdara-an-Accidental-Death-Ray

    If that still doesn’t work, try reloading with ctrl-F5 or clearing your cache.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  73. Re:Death ray by russotto · · Score: 1

    Every knows it's no actually a death ray, but they could hype it up and do a tongue and cheek promotion.

    The article says the windows have some film to reduce the effect by 70%, but that wasn't enough. Perhaps they should just remove the film and make a real death ray. Or put a barbecue pit where the pool is and have environmentally friendly barbecues.

  74. "Couldn't imagine what it could be" by KingOfTheMoon · · Score: 1

    So here's this lawyer burning up, rubbing his head and shifting every which way, watching his newspaper melting, and saying that he "couldn't imagine what it could be." How about the huge building that looks like the eye of freakin' Sauron? Oh wait:

    "At the bar, he explained..."

    Indeed, lol.

  75. Why don't they just install a generator... by Palpatine_li · · Score: 1

    at the damn focus, and build a solar power station like in Fallout:Las Vegas? Where are all the self dubbed environmentalists? Shouldn't they be pushing for it now?

    1. Re:Why don't they just install a generator... by RoboRay · · Score: 1

      Computer modelling found that the generator would produce almost enough power to rotate the entire building to keep the collector at the focus of the beam.

  76. Re:PLEASE GO AWAY IDLE by Leebert · · Score: 1

    Funny, it's working again. I hadn't tried it in a while. Thanks!

  77. My wife's make up mirror has the same power by Ted+Stoner · · Score: 1

    One day I smelled something burning and scrambled frantically, as I thought I had an electrical fire starting within the walls of my house. Turns out it was my wife's make up mirror sitting innocently on the edge of the bathtub. The sun hit the mirror just right and beamed a focused light onto a plastic container. The lid of the container was half-melted and smoking badly.

  78. Re:Death ray by geekoid · · Score: 1

    The BBQ idea is awesome. Unfortunately it would need to be move a little every day. Still doable.

    OR a mini portable steam generator all kind of chrome and Brass parts moving from the power of the sun. You could put it on a track and have it move lightly under it's own power.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  79. Simpler solution to death ray add a second robotic by foolish_to_be_here · · Score: 1

    As it stand it probably will not kill anyone. OTOH add a second mirror driven by a very simple robotic car to capture to rays at the focal point and reflect them back to a central focal point where the energy could be harnessed. Now THAT would result in a DEATH RAY!

    --
    Please mod me 1 or troll. It's where the truth is these days, even on Slashdot. Beware the power of moderators everywh
  80. Just Call It Green Engineering... by ChaoticPup · · Score: 1

    On the "bright" side, they might qualify for alternative energy tax credits...

  81. Poolside brunch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mmm, Carne Asada - please consult your Farmer's Almanac for specific windows where 'medium well' may be ordered.

  82. 1..2..3... Profit by richardoz · · Score: 1

    Ah.. I have an idea a simple 7 step plan for profit:
    1. Build crazy concave building with highly reflective glass
    2. Insure building has an acute focal point for sunlight in the afternoon
    3. Build pool deck at focal point to insure maximum people density
    4. Sell bathers and “sun worshipers” some “protective” solar cells
    5. Wire ‘em up to the utility grid
    6. Sell the electricity
    7. Profit. $$$

    --
    All the worlds indeed a .sig, and we are mearly players..
  83. Re:This was the subject of an old sci fi short sto by muphin · · Score: 1

    it was on, "the out limits" ooooooh!!!!!

    --
    It's not a typo if you understood the meaning!
  84. High Tech by Gofyerself · · Score: 1

    Right now, the hotel is looking at getting some larger, thicker umbrellas, maybe some large plants and a few other more high-tech options,

    Plants and umbrellas are "high tech" options?

  85. Re:PLEASE GO AWAY IDLE by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

    It was a posting about death rays! How could you possibly NOT click on it!

    --
    bickerdyke
  86. Re:Fix it? That's not what I read... by jandrese · · Score: 1

    I'm suspecting that said plants would need to be replaced on a very regular basis, as they get baked to death by the intense sunlight every day.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  87. You keep saying that word by codeButcher · · Score: 1
    Man with laptop at counter: "Where do I find the hotspot?"

    (OK, so these days hotels in Vegas might probably be immersed in Wifi. Wouldn't know, haven't stayed in a hotel for years and will do my best to continue on that path, have never been in a hotel on either of the American continents.)

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
  88. Who wants to bet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that we'll see this on CSI by the end of this season? It's only September, TV production is in full swing right now...

  89. Re:This was the subject of an old sci fi short sto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like "A Series of Unfortunate Events", but then .. I might be wrong ...

  90. Noes... by ZeRu · · Score: 1

    It accidentally the whole death ray!

    --
    If you post as an AC, don't expect me to spend a mod point on you.
  91. As Predicted in 2008 by Wanado · · Score: 0
    From a preview article showing the building/pool design in 2008, the author said:

    I'm extremely worried that the synergy of the energy reflection is going to turn this pool deck into a frying pan. Think ants + magnifying glass. [...] Perhaps CityCenter's crack team of architects have done enough mathematics and simulation tests to have figured out a solution. Perhaps they haven't. We'll find out August 2010.

    --
    Somehow along the way I made a bad choice in life and now must live with 0 Karma.
  92. Re:PLEASE GO AWAY IDLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually yes. I use Google Reader for my RSS feeds. The RSS feed for Slashdot does not tell you if its "idle" or "politics" or what have you. You just get the main page stories. Sometimes more than once (depends if they come back to the main page). I think you'll find most people complaining about Idle are getting surprised by it.

    Personally I don't mind.

  93. Green Energy Solution For Vegas! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean this wasn't an intentional green energy project? They could generate power for a few minutes each day!