Slashdot Mirror


China Embargos Rare Earth Exports To Japan

Hugh Pickens writes "The NY Times reports that the Chinese government has placed a trade embargo on all exports to Japan of a crucial category of minerals used in products like hybrid cars, wind turbines and guided missiles. China mines 93 percent of the world's rare earth minerals, and more than 99 percent of the world's supply of some of the most prized rare earths, which sell for several hundred dollars a pound. The embargo comes after a dispute over Japan's detention of a Chinese fishing trawler captain whose ship collided with two Japanese coast guard vessels as he tried to fish in waters controlled by Japan but long claimed by China. The Chinese embargo is likely to have immediate repercussions in Washington. The House Committee on Science and Technology is scheduled to review a detailed bill to subsidize the revival of the American rare earths industry and the House Armed Services Committee is scheduled to review the American military dependence on Chinese rare earth elements."

470 comments

  1. I can see the historians now by Cruciform · · Score: 5, Funny

    "And then World War 3 was fought over dirt."

    "Don't you mean land, Grandpa?"

    "No, dirt. But it was extra special expensive dirt. I shot me a lot of Chinese just to get a wheelbarrow full. It paid for your fancy university education. And your radiation pills."

    1. Re:I can see the historians now by MozeeToby · · Score: 4, Informative

      You'd be shocked over the amount of wars fought over 'special dirt', or shiny but worthless metal, or salt. In any case, if China and Japan duke it out, it won't be about dirt, it will be about a century long conflict (which incidentally has had Japan framed up as the villains more often than China) that was never properly resolved after the end of WWII. Kind of how WWII itself was caused by the never properly resolved conflict known as WWI.

    2. Re:I can see the historians now by Cruciform · · Score: 3, Informative

      Dirt, spice, poppies, slaves. We'll pretty much go to war over anything.

    3. Re:I can see the historians now by biobogonics · · Score: 4, Informative

      "And then World War 3 was fought over dirt."

      When the U.S. embargoed oil to Japan in July, 1941 it was almost a certainty that war would soon follow.

    4. Re:I can see the historians now by zero_out · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wow... you don't want to put a resource embargo on Japan. That has a tendency to cause problems, like Pearl Harbor. Most of Japan's exports require rare earths. Without them, their economy will likely tank. Are the Chinese really this nuts? This isn't war, yet, and Japan doesn't have much of a military, but still. It's like the two were turning up the heat, from 22 C to 23, then 24, and now China just cranks it up to 93. Maybe I'm overestimating the escalation here, but wow... Is this captain really as valuable as an Austrian Archduke?

    5. Re:I can see the historians now by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Them's fightin' words...

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    6. Re:I can see the historians now by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      New business plan:

      1. Set up shop in Hong Kong, Russia, or South Korea.
      2. Buy rare-earth elements from China.
      3. ???
      4. Profit!
      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    7. Re:I can see the historians now by sakdoctor · · Score: 3, Informative

      The magnets extend life. The magnets expand consciousness. The magnets are vital to space travel.

    8. Re:I can see the historians now by DIplomatic · · Score: 1

      See here in the States, we do our fighting over intellectual properties with nearly-identical features. HTML5 vs Flash, Blu-Ray vs HD-DVD.....

    9. Re:I can see the historians now by confused+one · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Japan doesn't have much of a military,"

      That's because it's constitutionally prevented from having more than a "defensive force" of small scale. Treaties signed with the U.S. post-WWII require the U.S. to assist in the defense of Japan if it is attacked. See Defense policy of Japan

    10. Re:I can see the historians now by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow... you don't want to put a resource embargo on Japan. That has a tendency to cause problems, like Pearl Harbor.

      Or Gundam suits.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    11. Re:I can see the historians now by geekoid · · Score: 1

      In this case, it's being fought over water.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:I can see the historians now by Kepesk · · Score: 1

      Awesome. Does this all mean those cool rare earth magnets are going to get super expensive? I'm going to miss those.

    13. Re:I can see the historians now by cf18 · · Score: 1

      False. Japan's navy is very technologically advanced only second to US.

    14. Re:I can see the historians now by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "like Pearl Harbor"... Yea that worked out so well for Japan.
      This is really going to push a lot of buttons. Good thing is that rare earths are not all that rare just hard to separate. There are large deposits in Mountian Pass California.
      The US and other nations stopped mining it because China produced it cheaper... Looks like the price has gone way up. Maybe it is time we stopped depending on China for anything.
      Oh and if China decided to wreck the US economy then it wrecks it own. Too much of their wealth is in US dollars.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    15. Re:I can see the historians now by cf18 · · Score: 1

      It was not properly resolved because at the end of WWII USA intentionally leave the issue with the island unresolved.

    16. Re:I can see the historians now by zrbyte · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes you are a bit overstating, but the point is still valid. This will most likely turn out to be a show of power by China on the lines of:

      "Oh come now Mr. Hatoyama, you don't really mean that. I have you by your balls."

      However, situations like this are a sign of bigger problems, namely that tensions over resources are mounting all over the World. We will have to be very careful to avoid (any more) real and bloody conflicts.

    17. Re:I can see the historians now by nomadic · · Score: 1

      and Japan doesn't have much of a military, but still

      Japan has a large, very well-equipped, very well-trained military.

    18. Re:I can see the historians now by interval1066 · · Score: 4, Informative

      "When the U.S. embargoed oil to Japan in July, 1941 it was almost a certainty that war would soon follow."

      Only because of Japanese expansionist imperial policy and the invasion of Manchuria made it clear what Japanese goals were in the pacific. And their attack on Pearl Harbor later that year didnt help.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    19. Re:I can see the historians now by maxume · · Score: 1

      Geekoid already won with his comment about water, but it is also worth pointing out that there is plenty of dirt around the rest of the world, just not very many people interested in competing with China when it comes to environmental carnage.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    20. Re:I can see the historians now by aurispector · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You guys are surprisingly lighthearted over this. The chinese control a significant percentage of various rare earth supplies. They're called "rare" for a reason. This embargo is just anther example of the strong arm tactics the chinese government so liberally employs in their bid to extend their power and influence over the world. Currency manipulation is another way they deliberately try to wreck western economies. They're succeeding, too.
      .
      They are not nice people. China is not "free" in any sense of the word.
      .
      As they continue to turn the screws, expect to spend more for just about everything, which will be extra hard since all the jobs are going to china...
      .
      Enjoy your coming third world lifestyle.

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    21. Re:I can see the historians now by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I say we drop the treaty and let Japan have a full military again. They should be footing the bill for this, not us. Besides, they can help keep the pressure on China too.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    22. Re:I can see the historians now by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Well-trained and Well-equipped, yes, large, not really. China's military is literally about ten times bigger. If a shooting war were to break out between Japan and China, the US military would be going to work.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    23. Re:I can see the historians now by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >Treaties signed with the U.S. post-WWII require the U.S. to assist in the defense of Japan if it is attacked.

      Such treaties are in the set of errors that led to the madness that was the First World War.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    24. Re:I can see the historians now by Antisyzygy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Part of the problem stems from something a bit different than what you say. For one, aggression is relative, i.e. History is written by the victors. Japan tried numerous times to fit in with the "imperialist" nations like Britain, France, ect. They never were really accepted by the western imperialist countries as an equal. The few times they militarily dominated parts of China, western powers swooped in and told them they couldn't create a colony there mostly because the western powers wanted Chinese goods. The Japanese felt screwed over whenever the western powers decided that they should not in fact be allowed to create colonies when the western powers themselves were in Africa and other places creating colonies. Long story short, the Japanese did not care for us westerners much and saw us as an adversary to their acquirement of parts of mainland Asia (Mostly in China). This is part of the motivation for Pearl Harbor as they felt if they tried to conquer Manchuria again they would be opposed by westerners. This being the case, they wanted to wipe out the US naval fleet so we couldnt react quick enough to their invasion. After WWII, imperialism is pretty much dead and I would venture to say the Japanese people are not interested in acquiring any part of China. I doubt the situation between Japan and China is the Japanese peoples' fault at this point. If anything the history between them is used by Chinese people as motivation to hate the Japanese.

      DISCLAIMER : There are other current economic reasons for the conflict between Japan and China, but I am addressing the "aggression" part of the parent statement.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    25. Re:I can see the historians now by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you don't know a lot of Chinese people of an older generation, you probably don't know just how important a part of their daily consciousness, the memory that the Japanese perpetrated genocidal acts against them, not so long ago. This is a cultural thread that is seldom discussed, yet is central to the social and political thought of many Chinese, with regard to Japan.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    26. Re:I can see the historians now by JordanL · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, but how do they fucking work?

    27. Re:I can see the historians now by GlobalEcho · · Score: 1

      Japan doesn't have much of a military

      Actually, Japan's military spending is the sixth most in the world, and not that far behind China's. Those constitutional clauses are observed mainly in the breach.

    28. Re:I can see the historians now by demonbug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Japan doesn't have much of a military,"

      That's because it's constitutionally prevented from having more than a "defensive force" of small scale. Treaties signed with the U.S. post-WWII require the U.S. to assist in the defense of Japan if it is attacked. See Defense policy of Japan

      Which brings into question what constitutes an attack. I think most would agree that a strike at Japan's economy constitutes an attack (albeit not a physical one); this is clearly an attack on Japan's economy - does this mean the US is obligated to defend Japan? Or does that clause only come into effect for physical, military conflicts (in which case all China would need to destroy Japan is restrain from actually attacking them militarily, if that is their goal)?

      I don't think this will actually come anywhere near that point, probably the Chinese captain will be put through a quick trial, found guilty, slapped with a fine and deported, and the whole thing will blow over, but we'll see. I'm not sure it is really possible for them to equitably divide the area in question, so this is likely to continue to blow up in the future (not least because Taiwan also has some claim, no way in hell China is going to let them have anything).

    29. Re:I can see the historians now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japan might not have much of an army today, but they do have Godzilla!

    30. Re:I can see the historians now by Antisyzygy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Spice?

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    31. Re:I can see the historians now by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      China wants Japanese business. Basically, if we all buy Chinese goods instead of Japanese then China wins. This is scary stuff since guess who gets to back Japan up (hint : US).

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    32. Re:I can see the historians now by the+linux+geek · · Score: 1

      Japan would win that one. Their Air Force is capable of holding their own and their Navy is probably the second most powerful in the world, despite being slightly smaller than PLAN. It would never come to a ground conflict.

    33. Re:I can see the historians now by Script+Cat · · Score: 1

      Yes, all this means is that they will just get their rare earths from other suppliers.
      "United States, Brazil, India, Sri Lanka and Australia" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neodymium#Occurrence_and_production)
      Mining activities will increase in those areas.

    34. Re:I can see the historians now by Bowling+Moses · · Score: 4, Informative

      Japan also has the second largest navy in Asia; China's is larger. There are some signs of Japan building up, including the not exactly constitutional Hyuga class "destroyers" which are in reality small (currently VTOL-only) aircraft carriers capable of carrying up to 11 aircraft. Larger ships capable of carrying more aircraft and 4,000 troops are supposed to start construction in 2011. They sound more like an amphibious assault ship half the size of a Tarawa class ship of the US Navy than a destroyer.

    35. Re:I can see the historians now by es330td · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am pretty sure one of the worst decisions that could ever possibly be made would be to get into a conventional war with a country with an overpopulation problem that is only a couple of hundred miles away by boat. The Chinese could just start sending ships full of civilians to Japan and overwhelm their infrastructure. The Japanese couldn't shoot unarmed civilians; they would have to arrest and detain them. China could collapse Japan without firing a shot.

    36. Re:I can see the historians now by wrook · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not about the captain. It's about the territory. China claims the islands, but Japan controls them. If China can effectively nullify the control then they can take the islands (and the resulting territorial waters). There is a lot of disputed territory in that area. It could get messy.

    37. Re:I can see the historians now by mqduck · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "When the U.S. embargoed oil to Japan in July, 1941 it was almost a certainty that war would soon follow."

      Only because of Japanese expansionist imperial policy and the invasion of Manchuria made it clear what Japanese goals were in the pacific. And their attack on Pearl Harbor later that year didnt help.

      Yes, it certainty-ed war because of Japanese expansionist policy. That doesn't make it any less factual, however. One lesson nobody seems to be taught, for some reason, is that history can only be understood when you stop asking the question "who's morally responsible?".

      --
      Property is theft.
    38. Re:I can see the historians now by Unkyjar · · Score: 3, Funny

      If we allow them to build a military, their giant robots will dominate the planet and fighting for the next 100 years. There must be another way!

    39. Re:I can see the historians now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When Japan threatened to conquer the entire Eastern Pacific rim (including Australia) it was almost a certainty that war would soon follow......oh, wait........

    40. Re:I can see the historians now by lanceran · · Score: 1

      No, magnets.

    41. Re:I can see the historians now by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      He read some really F#$%ed up version of Dune.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    42. Re:I can see the historians now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Only because of Japanese expansionist imperial policy

      And who was responsible for that policy? Japan had minded its own business for thousands of years. It didn't even consider the possibility that it might be desirable to expand its control outside the Japanese homeland until a certain other rather aggressively expansionistic country used direct military intervention to force a regime change.

    43. Re:I can see the historians now by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Informative

      They're called "rare" for a reason."

      You would think so but despite the name they are not rare.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    44. Re:I can see the historians now by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      for China's military to be 10 times bigger than Japan's, the Japanese military (including reserves) would have to be about 20 million - that's 10 times more than the United States can muster.
      But, well trained and well equipped count for a lot (vis. Germany vs Russia).

      China would probably have a hell of a job to invade Japan (no chance of air superiority - the Japanese have no small quantity of F-15s, and the US has F-22s there), but anyone attacking China sounds like an equally difficult proposition - the Chinese just have too large an army to make an Overlord-style landing. The only option would be to pack troops into friendly countries bordering China and roll over the border once they were there, or pack them into nearby friendly countries which have countries who could be rolled over between them and China (which is generally a diplomatic faux pas). i.e. Russia is the only possible country in the first category (though I suspect that they wouldn't be up for it), otherwise there's South Korea (and rolling across North Korea would not be easy), Thailand (rolling across any of Laos, Burma & Vietnam - yikes!), India (rolling across Burma - the India-China border just isn't realistic) or Pakistan (cutting a small bit of Tajikistan, or generally rolling across Tajikistan & Kazakhstan).

      In conclusion, no-one has any realistic prospect of successfully attacking China.

      Of course, China knows this; they also know that right now, no-one has the forces, finances or stomach to start world war 3. In maybe 5 years time, the forces and finances will be less of a problem, and they'd have to rely on merely the lack of stomach for starting a war which will make WW2 look like a playground scrap. Unsurprising, therefore, that they have done this now.
      Or it could just be diplomatic posturing (more likely).

      --
      FGD 135
    45. Re:I can see the historians now by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      If we allow them to build a military, their giant robots will dominate the planet

      So, a win-win!

    46. Re:I can see the historians now by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      Japan doesn't have much of a military

      You'd be surprised. Despite the constitutional limitations that were designed to make Japan militarily dependent on the US, Japan's Navy is a match for the Chinese Navy and Japan can have nuclear weapons in a flash if it needed them. If Japan had a full military buildup with the support of US and other western powers, I wouldn't want to pick sides in that war. South Korea and Taiwan also have nice modern navies and they are not particularly looking forward to Chinese domination of the pacific.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    47. Re:I can see the historians now by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

      Touche sir. I concede your point.

    48. Re:I can see the historians now by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      "properly resolved"? And what, exactly, does that mean? There's only one way to end a conflict while ensuring that the other side never bothers you again: it's called "genocide". I sure hope that's not your idea of a "proper resolution".

    49. Re:I can see the historians now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is part of the motivation for Pearl Harbor as they felt if they tried to conquer Manchuria again they would be opposed by westerners. This being the case, they wanted to wipe out the US naval fleet so we couldnt react quick enough to their invasion

      Except that they invaded Manchuria in 1931, 10 years before Pearl Harbor. The reason for the war against the US was the control of the Pacific, not Asia itself.

    50. Re:I can see the historians now by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 4, Funny

      Magnetic fields do no work.

    51. Re:I can see the historians now by clarkkent09 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's a pretty silly idea. In an actual war Japan would announce that any such ships that enter Japanese territorial waters would be sunk and if China is crazy enough to still send them it would be their fault, not Japan's.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    52. Re:I can see the historians now by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      Dachau, Bergen-Belsen, Auchswitz, should we have stopped asking after the 5th death camp was revealed? The 10th? The 20th? Where would you have stopped asking for a moral responsibility?

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    53. Re:I can see the historians now by nomadic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Japan would sink those ships with little hesitation. China couldn't even take Taiwan because of their naval deficiencies, let alone Japan.

    54. Re:I can see the historians now by turkeyfish · · Score: 1, Informative

      "They should be footing the bill for this, not us."

      They already are footing the bill. They pay virtually all the expenses for the US military presence in Japan. Why do you think the Japanese public is so upset about it? They also pay most of the expense for the fuel oil used by our Navy in its fleet in the Western Indian Ocean. There was quite a stir in US military circles, when a former government briefly said they weren't going to do it any more.

      Japanese are probably not going to re-militarize. They recognize they simply couldn't afford it nor do they have the raw materials necessary to do it (the last time they did this they used iron ore from Manchuria, and oil from Indonesia no longer available to them). They would just fall into the Chinese orbit of influence, with Korea probably soon to follow after that.

    55. Re:I can see the historians now by turkeyfish · · Score: 1

      Not so sure. The Chinese have deployed extensive highly maneuverable killer satellites capable of taking out US spy and geopositioning systems worldwide. If our Air Force would attack they almost certainly will be doing it without GPS or electronic guidance. The Chinese air defenses are propositioned on a strong EMP defense, which will fry most electronic components in modern military hardware. Given they have the rare-earth metals need to make new ones, its not at all clear that we have the upper hand in any kind of protracted conflict.

    56. Re:I can see the historians now by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      spice -> neodymium

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    57. Re:I can see the historians now by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      I meant to say I wouldn't want to pick a winner. I would definitely be on Japan's side.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    58. Re:I can see the historians now by angus77 · · Score: 1

      We didn't go to war over Auschwitz. In fact, the war started before Auschwitz.

    59. Re:I can see the historians now by confused+one · · Score: 1

      It was done that way because they used to have a very martial society. To quote Japan's constitution: "The Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as a means of settling international disputes." Since the U.S., Britain, et. al., post WWII, were trying to demilitarize Japan, we agreed to provide protection from outside invasion. They are, as someone else mentioned below, starting to build up their military in response to threats from N. Korea and China.

    60. Re:I can see the historians now by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Some would argue that with the unfair settlement of WWI, it was almost a certainty that war would soon follow. So what? In the buildup to war, typically both sides have many chances to avoid war. It's a matter of whether it's worth it to them or not.

      Had Japan been smart, they would have never started a war they couldn't win, they would have negotiated peace in exchange for lifting the embargo. But they didn't.

      --
      Qxe4
    61. Re:I can see the historians now by angus77 · · Score: 1
      They way you put it, it's as if the Japanese requested the US military to be stationed there.

      The US military is in Japan because it's in the US's best interest to have a military presence in the Far East.

    62. Re:I can see the historians now by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      You can just see ministers in South Africa, Russia, South America, Australia, Canada ect. calling in their experts.
      How much do we have, how expensive is it to extract, can we export soon :)
      http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/09/17/3014499.htm?section=business

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    63. Re:I can see the historians now by hhw · · Score: 1, Informative

      In any case, if China and Japan duke it out, it won't be about dirt, it will be about a century long conflict (which incidentally has had Japan framed up as the villains more often than China)

      Yeah, funny how a massacre with mass murder (in the 100,000's) and rape (in the 10,000's) kind of paints one side as more of a villain.

      --
      http://astutehosting.com/
    64. Re:I can see the historians now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "Pride in one's own race - and that does not imply contempt for other races - is also a normal and healthy sentiment. I have never regarded the Chinese or the Japanese as being inferior to ourselves. They belong to ancient civilizations, and I admit freely that their past history is superior to our own. They have the right to be proud of their past, just as we have the right to be proud of the civilization to which we belong. Indeed, I believe the more steadfast the Chinese and the Japanese remain in their pride of race, the easier I shall find it to get on with them." - Adolf Hitler (RIP, brother).

    65. Re:I can see the historians now by angus77 · · Score: 1

      "like Pearl Harbor"... Yea that worked out so well for Japan.

      It nearly did. Look how far they got despite having nothing much in the way of allies and fighting on jsut about all possible fronts.

      This time they have allies. The US is already positioned all over Japan.

    66. Re:I can see the historians now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " The Japanese couldn't shoot unarmed civilians; they would have to arrest and detain them. "

      Umm Japan has a pretty solid history of shooting LOTS of unarmed citizens, Chinese ones specifically.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_war_crimes

      In fact trusting any Goverment to NOT behave in a genocidal fashion for whatever reasons is pretty naive. What's that you say? Oh I didn't realize that it's all different now....

    67. Re:I can see the historians now by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 3, Informative

      For the Chinese the magic words are not "SS and Auschwitz" but "Unit 371 and Harbin". However, today the Chinese are being the aggressors - but only in an economic sense and it's not like they are the first to use the economic leverage they have. What is interesting is that fact that they're using those levers very early on in their ascendancy - which is making everyone else very nervous.

    68. Re:I can see the historians now by geekpowa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've tried to parse your post multiple times and it appears to me that you are playing apologist for Japan's actions during WW2 and implying that moral responsibility in part extends beyond Japan and to the west.

      Novel, yet dubious position to take. I think your theory will enjoy minimal support from the Chinese, Filipinos and Indonesians who lived through the Asia/Pacific war and its immediate aftermath.

      The trigger for Japan's declaration of war on the US was the oil embargo, which US put in place many, many, years after initial Manchuria invasion presumably in response to the escalating brutality of the invasion or at least so say the Americans. You say Japan did not care for westerners. Actually, Japan doesn't care much for anyone, as evidence by their behaviour in occupied territories during WW2.

    69. Re:I can see the historians now by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 1

      Yes, the Japanese military is arguably more powerful than the Chinese. The advantages of China are its manpower reserves and nuclear weapons. Japan has the advantage of better equipment and training and the US as its ally (arguably this also means the rest of the world are likely to favour or at least be neutral to the Japanese position). Japan could also easily match China in nuclear weapons if it felt so threatened. If Japan chose to embargo China by disrupting oil going to China (eg. naval detainment and inspections of all oil tankers destined for China) this could cause a lot of trouble for China and result in the worst outcome for everyone, which is social instability in China as workers would lose their jobs.

      If China's goal is to show Japan who is boss they seem to have played a bad hand on this one.

    70. Re:I can see the historians now by paedobear · · Score: 1

      You ARE John Major, and I claim my five pounds! Seriously though, Japan hadn't even minded it's own business for "hundreds" of years let alone "thousands" when the Black Ships arrived (it wasn't even a totally closed society - and would have ended up open without the Black Ships, eventually, as the ruling class were aware of how far behind they were being left)

    71. Re:I can see the historians now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > This is part of the motivation for Pearl Harbor as they felt if they tried to conquer Manchuria again they would be opposed by westerners

      You do realize Japan had already taken Beijing in 1937, right? It is Japan's invasion of China that led to the US embargo. You have a lot of your sequence of events reversed.

    72. Re:I can see the historians now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, today the Chinese are being the aggressors - but only in an economic sense.

      I suspect the people of Tibet would disagree we with, if they were allowed to.

    73. Re:I can see the historians now by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      They "couldn't" shoot civilians?

      Sure they could. It may be illegal under the laws of war, but laws are not actually able to enforce themselves.

    74. Re:I can see the historians now by Iron+Condor · · Score: 1

      My memory may be failing here, but I seem to recall that M3 had not just found water on the moon (which was widely reported in the press) but a whole bunch of Holmium, Neodymium, Europium - that kind of stuff (which was quite ignored in the press). If I'm remembering this right, then maybe China is handing us the economic lever arm for space colonization.

      Just thinking out loud here...

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
    75. Re:I can see the historians now by biobogonics · · Score: 1

      "When the U.S. embargoed oil to Japan in July, 1941 it was almost a certainty that war would soon follow."

      Only because of Japanese expansionist imperial policy and the invasion of Manchuria made it clear what Japanese goals were in the pacific. And their attack on Pearl Harbor later that year didnt help.

      I was not trying to justify the actions of the Japanese at all. I once studied the diplomatic history of the events leading up to Pearl Harbor in geat detail. My point is that the US could have been better prepared for war.

      My second point is that nations do go to war over such things, even if there are other factors involved.

    76. Re:I can see the historians now by Antisyzygy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Any nations actions are the responsibility of their government, so I am not saying the west is at fault. I am just highlighting the fact that the Japanese tried to play the Imperialist game and no-one would let them. The British, the French, the Spanish, ect. were pulling the same crap all over the world. What the Japanese did was just like what the British, Spanish and French did. I.e. they came to the Americas and either forced or killed Native Americans so they would relinquish their land. However, the Japanese did this in Manchuria. Not to mention, you fail to consider that Japanese people lived through the war as well. What happened to them? They had most of their major cities reduced to ash with incendiaries (see firebombing of Tokyo) and atomic bombs were tested on them for the first time. I say tested because the US military literally wanted to see what would happen if an atomic bomb was dropped since they still didn't fully understand what radiation does to a human being. Before you say "well, the Japanese performed unethical medical experiments on people so they were worse" why don't you look at the plutonium injections given to healthy people, radioactive iron given to pregnant women, and full body irradiation of US citizens in studies funded and sponsored by our very own government and the Atomic Energy Commission. War is not so simple as "one side is right, the other is wrong". Usually there is a dispute, and then all diplomatic relations break down to the point where force is used. The History of the event is written by the victors. This is why we view Japanese as "evil" and look at ourselves as a having a moral high ground. We have anything but that.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    77. Re:I can see the historians now by nicodoggie · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a Filipino, I know most of the country's been brainwashed thoroughly by American propaganda. The entire "We're the heroes" illusion is well received here. Until relatively recently, most people still think the Americans really demolished the Spanish in the local Spanish-American war, instead of an act to hide the Treaty of Paris.

      Japan's goal in WWII was basically a unification of Asia so it could be independent of Western "superiority". Also anecdotal evidence (mostly from my grandparents) says that the Japanese themselves weren't the ones raping and killing the captured population, just the Koreans who worked for them.

    78. Re:I can see the historians now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google "Japanese atrocities WW2" They make the Germans look tame in a lot of ways. They were a special kind of sadistic nasty.

    79. Re:I can see the historians now by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      M3 had not just found water on the moon (which was widely reported in the press) but a whole bunch of Holmium, Neodymium, Europium...

      Of course! The Japanese could launch robots to mine these minerals, pack them into large cargo ships for return to Earth, and then crash them into Beijing.

    80. Re:I can see the historians now by geekpowa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The "co prosperity sphere" angle sounded fair enough; pity it wasn't the reality. I understand that general mood of the Filipino is not nearly as embittered as the Chinese, particularly around the major cities. What I find interesting is that younger generation Filipinos are as ignorant of WW2 as the younger generation Japanese. My experience is different to yours though, in Leyte for example amongst older generations is that bitterness and animosity is still there.

      I am unsure of the aspersions you cast towards the Koreans, yet Japanese appalling behaviour towards civilian population and POWs during the war is well documented. It isn't mere propaganda as you imply.

      If you want to make a fair measure of Japan's attitude towards its neighbours, compare Japan's attitude towards OFW workforce and migrant immigration compared to other first world nations. Japan would sooner engage in absurd pursuits like building $300k per unit nursing robots then allow its society be 'watered-down' by Filipino caregivers.

      I am no lover of American activity in Philippines. I never comprehended complete and total openness that Philippine society embraced US, given US colonial aspirations and the ugliness of Subic and Angeles (never been to Angeles but its reputation precedes itself). But this is off topic: what is being discussed is the morality of Japan's actions upto and during WW2.

    81. Re:I can see the historians now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      F/q=vxB, faggot

    82. Re:I can see the historians now by DirtyCanuck · · Score: 3, Funny

      Obligatory Willie Quote:

      "It won't last; brothers and sisters are natural enemies. Like Englishmen and Scots, or Welshmen and Scots, or Japanese and Scots, or Scots and other Scots. Damn Scots! They ruined Scotland"

    83. Re:I can see the historians now by skids · · Score: 1

      History prediction:

      "The House Committee on Science and Technology scheduled a review of a detailed bill to subsidize the revival of the American rare earths industry and the House Armed Services Committee scheduled a review the American military dependence on Chinese rare earth elements"

      "After bringing the bill to the Senate floor twice, where was filibustered by the Minority (and Ben Nelson), Senate majority leader Harry Reid negotiated a deal with Joe Leiberman and John McCain calling for hiring Halliburton as a sole source vendor to mine the minerals from under several Afghani villages. Once this ammendment was included, the Minority and Ben Nelson, now joined by a gang of three Blue Dog colleages which offset Leiberman and McCain's votes, fillibustered the bill a third time. Only when the bill authorized Halliburton to conscript children from U.S. oprhanages to do the labor, was it finally able to pass."

      "The entire Republican slate of senate candidates then campaigned as though they had voted for the bill, and won handily as turnout among dumbasses reached a record level."

    84. Re:I can see the historians now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not so simple - I am fairly sure War between China & the land of the rising sun
      dates back to at least the 13th century. Long enough that neither side has any
      squatting rights on the "good guys" label. The Koreans on the other hand have
      always been in the middle getting hammered!

    85. Re:I can see the historians now by geekpowa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am aware that the Japanese suffered during the war and attacks on Tokyo and usage of the Bomb represent highly controversial issues which will probably never be satisfactorily resolved and I think it is good and important that the controversy of using weapons of mass destruction is aired and looked at from every possible angle even 60+ years later: which conflicts your claim that history is written by the victors because if it was then such dialog would not be occurring.

      But make no mistake, the Japanese were the aggressors here and they engaged in a programme of Total War underpinned with fundamentalist self righteous fervor. They could of brokered truce at any time. They could of chosen not to treat civilian populations and POWs with utter contempt. They, unlike the Germans, cannot claim that they were pushed into a corner in denied opportunity of economic prosperity or national self determination by Allied nations; they were completely in the wrong. Millions of people suffered terribly as a consequence of their actions, including themselves.

    86. Re:I can see the historians now by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      Think a little more closely about what the result of a cross product is perpendicular to and report back to us.

    87. Re:I can see the historians now by gullevek · · Score: 1

      Hatoyama isn't prime Minister anymore. It's Kan now.

      --
      "Freiheit ist immer auch die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" - Rosa Luxemburg, 1871 - 1919
    88. Re:I can see the historians now by Lotana · · Score: 1

      That is actually a very clever way to wage war providing your opponent is forced to follow international law.

      There bound to be some clause somewhere against such a use of civilian population. Forced deportation bound to raise issues and China wouldn't want to deal with the interference from UN or entirety of NATO.

    89. Re:I can see the historians now by Kagetsuki · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was just going to point that out but you did it for me. But upset or not the US bases in Japan are necessary - particularly in times like this, and if the residents near the base in Okinawa are so upset about noise they can fucking move somewhere else. Hatoyama is (was) an idiot and Kan isn't much better - despite the cost a favorable position with the US military is worth it and it's still less than it would take to develop and maintain a national military. Not to mention having a national military would just make Japan a target.

    90. Re:I can see the historians now by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      It is believed there is oil under and around the small islands where the boat collision occurred and it is suspected that if China had valid claim to those islands they would drill near them - but it's accepted by basically all nations other than China and Taiwan (who both periodically make claims to them) that the islands are Japanese territory.

    91. Re:I can see the historians now by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      Chinas army is probably much more than 10 times bigger.

    92. Re:I can see the historians now by hackerjoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're not supposed to feel sympathy for the Japanese of the 30s and 40s; they were guilty of terrible atrocities, but that war is over now. You're supposed to feel sympathy for the Japanese of 2010, who weren't in charge almost universally weren't even alive for World War II and are not acting particularly imperialist or aggressive.

      The point is that most white westerners have similarly barbaric atrocities of imperialism somewhere in their not-too-distant past. Go back far enough and everyone can find an ancestor that murdered a rival warlord's entire tribe; if you believe that what your grandparents' neighbours did should condemn you, we are all guilty!

      Eventually we have to forgive, or at least forget, if we're going to live together.

    93. Re:I can see the historians now by LurkerXXX · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ohhhh, they minded their own business for thousands of years before WWII? Really?

      You might want to inform the Koreans that they weren't really invaded by Japan in 1592 and part of their country wasn't under Japanese control for years subsequently.

    94. Re:I can see the historians now by geekpowa · · Score: 1

      I agree with your sentiment. I have few complaints with modern day Japan, and no more than the complaints I have with my own home nation, I have been to Japan many times and I enjoy the opportunity to spend time there as much as I can.

      The purpose of my comment was to challenge notions I hear from time to time trying to downplay the events of the Asia/Pacific war and attempt to reposition Japan as a beleaguered nation under suffrage from the west.

      I agree that many have much to answer for of which some have as yet not been held to full account and scrutiny for their actions, no less Western powers past (Spain) and present (US) for example.

      I also share your view of the need to move on and forgive, and to anyone who has lived through such pain and suffering but has learned to forgive has my upmost respect. Yet at the same time if people choose to carry bitterness of such events for the rest of their lives, that is their choice and I will not judge them on it : as I would not know how I would react if I suffered similar circumstances. But must never forget these things: the opposite: we must scrutinise them as much as possible, as many examples as possible, in order to deepen our individual understanding and come to terms with our inherent natures and how to manage our natural tribal and adversarial dispositions, which will never go away because it is a fundamental part of human behaviour.

    95. Re:I can see the historians now by Toze · · Score: 1

      Well, was it "the Nazis" or the people who voted them in? Those who held office? Those who held guns? Was it Hindenburg who gave Hitler power or the brownshirts in the streets who had street fights? Was it every German who had suspicions about the new regime but ignored them? Was it the generals? Was it the privates? Was in members of the Nazi party in 1935 who sought economic stability, or members of the Nazi party who had to join in order to get work in 1940? 14 year old boys defending their nation from invasion at the very end?

      The camps proved that horrible wrong had been done. They did not make it clear exactly who was and who was not to blame. Understanding the history of WWII requires that we put aside the question of who was responsible, so that we don't read for confirmation of our biases (Germans did it, or Nazis, Communists, Socialists, &c). It's impossible, but keeping in mind that we've got the bias helps us read more accurately.

      --
      No OS on the planet can protect itself from a user with the admin password. - Yvan256
    96. Re:I can see the historians now by smithmc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've tried to parse your post multiple times and it appears to me that you are playing apologist for Japan's actions during WW2 and implying that moral responsibility in part extends beyond Japan and to the west.

      I didn't read it that way. An attempt to explain Japan's motivations is not the same as justifying them, necessarily. Just as one might seek to explain, say, al-Qa'ida's motivations for 9/11 without suggesting that they were justified.

      Meanwhile, you may disagree with the explanation presented, but that's another matter.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    97. Re:I can see the historians now by smithmc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For the Chinese the magic words are not "SS and Auschwitz" but "Unit 371 and Harbin". However, today the Chinese are being the aggressors - but only in an economic sense and it's not like they are the first to use the economic leverage they have. What is interesting is that fact that they're using those levers very early on in their ascendancy - which is making everyone else very nervous.

      Well, it's not as though they haven't had plenty of examples to learn from, going back to the British Empire if not farther.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    98. Re:I can see the historians now by smithmc · · Score: 1

      I say we drop the treaty and let Japan have a full military again. They should be footing the bill for this, not us. Besides, they can help keep the pressure on China too.

      Indeed. I wonder how many F-22s, F-35s, and Patriot batteries we could sell them right now?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    99. Re:I can see the historians now by smithmc · · Score: 1

      "like Pearl Harbor"... Yea that worked out so well for Japan.

      It worked brilliantly for Japan. Their mistake was not in attacking Pearl Harbor, but in assuming that the US's response would be to stay out of the Pacific. If they were smart, they would have invaded Hawaii and left us with no power base in the Pacific from which to regroup and counterattack.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    100. Re:I can see the historians now by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      The chef grills them for like thirty seconds.

      If that isn't rare enough for you, you should order metals tartare.

    101. Re:I can see the historians now by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

      It's pretty academic, but I always wondered how Japan and Germany planned to divide the world if the Axis won.

      I mean, really planned. Not just what was in treaties. Did the Nazis expect to take on Japan after they were done with the rest of the world? Did Japan think that Germany would let them actually keep Asia?

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    102. Re:I can see the historians now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as 'rolling into China' is concerned, quite a few coutries you have mentioned there are Chinese bootlickers, e.g. Pakistan. They wouldn't allow any 'rolling over' into China from their territory.

      A better plan would be draw China's traditional rivals/enemies such as India and establish an alliance. The US and NATO along with Japan can bombard the Eastern urbanized part of China. Only ariel bombardment, no land invasion. But China must be made to feel, for all intents and purposes, that there is going to be a land invasion any moment.

      Simultaneously, India should attack with it's huge 1.1 million strong army, from the West. India should enter Tibet and Xinjiang while the Chinese are preoccupied fighting off bombardment and possible invasion on the east coast.

      Russia might not enter this war initially, but they can surely be convinced to make threatening moves such as moving more troops towards the Chinese border, and so on. Keep the Chinese guessing on the Northern front too.

      China will not survive even two weeks with this course of action. Nukes are a different matter, but China is not going to dare use nukes. Their country will probably cease to exist if they did.

    103. Re:I can see the historians now by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'm glad that my ancestor murdered a rival warlord's entire tribe. I much prefer that than the other way around.

      As for WWII Japan: sure, it was complicated. That's why the diplomats gave up. I'm just surprised that the Japanese maintain that being nuked was out of bounds of war, that it was somehow unfair. In war, nothing is out of bounds. It should be a reminder to the diplomats when they think they're done talking. Are they really ready to roll the dice on the imagination (and capability) for destruction by their opponents?

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    104. Re:I can see the historians now by swamp_ig · · Score: 1

      Actually the Japaneese *do* have a substantial miliatary!

      It's the second largest after the USA.

    105. Re:I can see the historians now by John+Saffran · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're supposed to feel sympathy for the Japanese of 2010, who weren't in charge almost universally weren't even alive for World War II and are not acting particularly imperialist or aggressive.

      No, just no .. japanese of 2010 may not have undertaken those acts themselves, but that's no excuse for the denialism of history that's taking place in present day japan. When Tojo's granddaughter goes around saying things like:

      "Japan did not fight a war of aggression. It fought in self-defense," she said. "Our children have been wrongly taught that their ancestors did evil things, that their country is evil. We need to give these children back their pride and confidence."

      without condemnation, that is the responsibility of the japanese of 2010 to correct. This they have not done, which is why the legacy of the years leading up to the end of WW2 continue to plague us. Forgiveness will come in time, but only once the appropriate measures have been taken to atone.

      The japanese of 2010 also have to take responsibility for the ongoing apartheid-like racism within their society. Numerous authors have, many of them japanese, have done much work to document this ongoing state and suffice to say that the evidence is quite damning. When the likes of David Suzuki (the well-known naturalist) goes out of his way to co-author of a book on the topic ("The Japan we never knew") then you know things are bad.

      The best author on the topic is Yasunori FUKUOKA of Saitama University and many of his papers are available at http://www.kyy.saitama-u.ac.jp/~fukuoka/index.html. His opinion is not particularly complementary when speaking of the widespread discrimination against those no considered "japanese"

      The Japanese government did not respect their rights as foreigners, instead they continued to oppress Korean human rights even after 1952, declaring "post-war democracy" whilst hiding the truth. The Japanese should recognize that not only the Japanese government, but also Japanese individuals should take responsibility for the difficulties imposed on Koreans in Japan.

      The largest victims are the Zainichi, but similar oppression was experienced by the likes of the Burakumin and other groups.

      Japan, both government and society, really needs to clean up their act before they claim to be victimised.

    106. Re:I can see the historians now by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Well,

      Japan made the political decision not to sign peace treaties with some of the allied powers after WW2. USA and Britain forced their treaties down their throat backed by their battleships main caliber. Russia and China did not have that leverage so the Japanese refused to sign it.

      As far as the Japanese are concerned WW2 is still not over and they have territorial pretences towards Russia, China, etc. Posturing about "never giving these away" is an essential part of Japanese domestic politics. There is a Russian saying: if you saw wind, do not complain when you harvest a storm.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    107. Re:I can see the historians now by 1u3hr · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I live in Hong Kong, which was occupied by Japan in 1941. Terrible as that was, massacres, rape, starvation; it was over 60 years ago. The "memory" of what happened is not simply recollection of the few remaining people who suffered, but the great mythology promoted by the Beijing government, demonising the Japanese. Admittedly, it's not hard with things like the Nanjing Massacre. But that didn't happen in a vacuum. The Chinese Communists and before them , Nationalists, churned the country into bloody mud for decades in their struggle for power, and killing untold millions. And Mao in the 50s and 60s in his insane Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution killed at least 50 million of his own people. That is something that is simply ignored and never spoken of in China, let alone taught in school history. Yet the memory of the Japanese atrocities much longer ago is referred to daily -- many suspect as a way to distract attention from current or past problems.

      And this current idiocy was triggered by a Chinese fishing boat that rammed a Japanese coastguard ship, and the captain was detained. The islands where this happened have been occupied by Japan for over a century and were never populated by anyone before that. After WWII Japan was forced to give back all the territory it had occupied in Korea and China, and none bothered at the time about these insignificant islands. But about 20 years ago Chinese started wrapping themselves in the flag and calling this a great violation of their sovereignty. An issue that should be settled by low level bureaucrats is over and over again used to tear open the scabs of a war that ended in 1945.

    108. Re:I can see the historians now by jandersen · · Score: 2, Informative

      I doubt the situation between Japan and China is the Japanese peoples' fault at this point

      Hmm, I see. Perhaps you are unaware of the events during the Japanese occupation of China - read up on it, Wikipedia has a several items on this, eg: The Nanjing massacre [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanjing_massacre]. As far as the Chinese goes, they have a lot of very painful memories from WWII, all connected with what Japanese soldiers did in China. The Japanese had a reputation during the war for extreme cruelty - one could almost think they enjoyed doing it. For comparison - German soldiers captured by Britain were treated with some decency in POW camps back in England, and British soldiers captured by the Germans were not too bad off either (as opposed to the Jews in the extermination camps), whereas US and British soldiers captured by the Japanese faced rather different conditions.

      The Chinese have many good reasons for hating Japan; it is not all to do with money. Can one blame the current generation of Japanese for what their grand parents did during the war? Perhaps not, but it is hardly any wonder that the Chinese find it distasteful when the Japanese government are totally unapologetic about what happened and still honour some of the war criminals as heroes. No doubt if China and Japan were friendly neighbors, they could easily find a compromise over the division of the water territories, but as you can see, that is exactly where something is missing.

    109. Re:I can see the historians now by tokul · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The point is that most white westerners have similarly barbaric atrocities of imperialism somewhere in their not-too-distant past. Go back far enough and everyone can find an ancestor that murdered a rival warlord's entire tribe; if you believe that what your grandparents' neighbours did should condemn you, we are all guilty!

      I suspect that people usually don't worship such ancestors in public, don't call them heroes and don't call military aggression "an incident".

    110. Re:I can see the historians now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Them magnetic coating joints are kinda necessary for the RX-78 in the OYW

    111. Re:I can see the historians now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are an American, your total lack of self awareness is outstanding. Oh and the irony of US corporation outsourcing the production of crucial rare magnet assemblies to China (as used in JDAMs for example) is so superbly amusing.

      Remember - China owns the US and Blowback is a Bitch.

    112. Re:I can see the historians now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can say that "I doubt the situation between Japan and China is the Japanese peoples' fault at this point." but you forget something important. The Japanese committed some awful atrocities that are still felt. My family was the victim of this. The Japanese do still to this day not really completely and wholeheartedly admit to what they did. That is the big difference with the Germans nobody hates them anymore because they really owned up to what they did. The Japanese never did.

    113. Re:I can see the historians now by AK+Marc · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      How'd that work for Israel's PR when armed militants tried to run a blockade and attacked the Israelis that boarded the ship to stop them? It doesn't matter if they announce or not, if they sink a ship or shoot someone in self defense, the Israelis are condemned. Or are you asserting that Japan doing it is ok, but Israel doing it is wrong?

    114. Re:I can see the historians now by master_p · · Score: 1

      (que Space Battleship Yamato music...)

      What i'd love to see is the Super Yamato class ships...18 inch guns, super wave motion gun and, of course, the indestructible third bridge... :-)

    115. Re:I can see the historians now by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Explaining is not excusing. Japan had a number of valid (at least to them) reasons to do what they did. There were a number of ways to have prevented it, from both sides. That doesn't excuse any particular action, but if we are unable to speak plainly about the causes and relationships, we will be caught unawares the next time it happens, which may be right now.

    116. Re:I can see the historians now by gtall · · Score: 1

      It may be making everyone else nervous, but I view it as a breath of fresh air. The Chinese government is finally showing their true colors and what they have in store for the rest of the world when they control enough raw materials and have a military to back it up. This won't be the last time the Chinese government pulls a stunt like this. Japan has already announced they are going to release the captain. China has just learned this sort of behavior works for them.

    117. Re:I can see the historians now by Evtim · · Score: 1

      They pay the bill for the American protection. And have paid it since the beginning. Never mind what you here officially. They do. Billions every year. Ask an honest Japanese (or at least well informed) one.

    118. Re:I can see the historians now by gtall · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The Israelis were condemned by the sort of people who always condemn Israel. And their action towards that ship seems to have stopped any other of Hama supporters from deciding they'd like to also become martyrs by provoking the Israelis.

    119. Re:I can see the historians now by AlecC · · Score: 1

      They may not have signed peace treaties, but their constitution requires their Self Defence forces to be used only defensively, and they have major political problems over something as aggressive as providing naval refuelling in the Indian Ocean in support of Afghanistan operations. Japan today really does not want war, whatever they may have done in the past. (Except, of course, the tiny number of far-right loonies that every country suffers from).

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    120. Re:I can see the historians now by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Not only did the war start before Auschwitz, we didn't really know what was going on in the concentration camps until shortly after the war ended. There were rumours, but it's not like the Germans were inviting diplomats or tourists to go on site-seeing tours.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    121. Re:I can see the historians now by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      If I wanted rare metals I would have ordered the sushi.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    122. Re:I can see the historians now by pegdhcp · · Score: 1

      His e-book has been near to a magnet...

    123. Re:I can see the historians now by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      So, you wanted free market, no? There you have, choke on it. You're China's bitch, now.

    124. Re:I can see the historians now by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Not only did the war start before Auschwitz, we didn't really know what was going on in the concentration camps until shortly after the war ended. There were rumours, but it's not like the Germans were inviting diplomats or tourists to go on site-seeing tours.

      The service contract to repair the IBM concentration camp management machines, which were built by IBM in Germany specifically for the purpose which could not have been done without support from IBM in the US, was served directly out of Armonk, NY. This is not the only way in which we knew what was going on in the concentration camps before the war ended, but it is one way. We knew precisely what was going on in those camps, stop telling yourself different. War has been for profit forever, and we are culpable. What makes you think WWII was any different? We waited even though we knew what was wrong specifically to put us into a position of economic power. The gates family fortune was indeed founded upon profiting from sending money to Hitler's SS. You are 100% wrong. We had no moral high ground; indeed, we were profiting from these occurrences.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    125. Re:I can see the historians now by GF678 · · Score: 1

      [quote]Wow... you don't want to put a resource embargo on Japan. That has a tendency to cause problems, like Pearl Harbor.[/quote]

      [quote]Or Gundam suits.[/quote]

    126. Re:I can see the historians now by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Wars my ass. If China wants to set a trade example, our constitution provides for the laying of tariffs on imports. We could drop income tax a bit, pay off debt to China and at the same time make Wal Mart hike prices enough that they will quit driving you and I out of business locally. Everybody good wins, everybody bad pays. Democrats will veto it as they prefer to live off the blood of the people.

               

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    127. Re:I can see the historians now by arivanov · · Score: 1

      You missed one subtle point.

      If you are already in a state of war the "selfdefence" definition automatically becomes very vague and stretched to the point where you can execute any offensive action of your liking. The sole reason why all these latent conflicts have never gone beyond posturing is not the Japanese constitution.

      It is the factor known as "Size Matters".

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    128. Re:I can see the historians now by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      But do the Japanese islands have uranium?

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    129. Re:I can see the historians now by nwmann · · Score: 1

      DUDE... the shortened version of et cetera is ETC not ECT please and thank you.

    130. Re:I can see the historians now by byersjus · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't you ask ICP?

    131. Re:I can see the historians now by eam · · Score: 1

      > the Japanese tried to play the Imperialist game and no-one would let them.

      They were allowed to play. Everyone was allowed to *play*. The Japanese just lost.

    132. Re:I can see the historians now by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1

      Just stay away from Buckyballs; they're poor quality.

    133. Re:I can see the historians now by Mr.Intel · · Score: 1

      You are discounting the fact that Chinese ASATs are not capable of killing a maneuvering satellite. Current Keyholes can change an entire orbit to avoid ASATS. Also, if the Chinese start shooting ASATs at our satellites, you better believe the super secret military shuttle with it's ASAT-killing laser will be deployed.

      --
      ASCII tastes bad dude.
      Binary it is then.
    134. Re:I can see the historians now by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Using a nuclear weapon is not out of bounds for a war when its necessary to use one. If you have evidence that its necessary to use nuclear weapons then post it. Keep in mind that two cities (Nagasaki and Hiroshima) were literally left alone by all military bombardment. No bombs were dropped on them save for Fat Man and Little Boy. Why? The majority of Japanese cities were smoldering piles of ash from our relentless fire-bombing. The fire-bombing itself was done in a way that made evacuation impossible (assuming the people didnt up and leave before the bombing started). Nagasaki and Hiroshima were left alone because the military wanted to see what an atom bomb would do to a "virgin" city and the AEC (at the time of the bomb dropping called the Manhattan Project) and others followed up for decades studying the long term affects of radiation on Japanese people who were near enough the explosion to get dosed with radiation. Now, I suppose an atom bomb detonating above your head is better than burning to death so maybe it was a mercy. Like I said before, war isnt so simple as we are right they are wrong. I am not a Japanese apologist nor am I trying to downplay their role, they did some horrible things (see vivisection experiments and japanese POW camps). I feel like both sides treated eachother very poorly.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    135. Re:I can see the historians now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your grammar is worse that the posters spelling.

    136. Re:I can see the historians now by angus77 · · Score: 1
      The link talks about the Bush family fortune, not Gates.

      Anyways, whether "we" (meaning you Americans) knew Auschwitz was happening is irrelevant to why everyone went to war.

      First came the war, next came the gas chambers.

    137. Re:I can see the historians now by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      But thank God we did.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    138. Re:I can see the historians now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be "could have" NOT "could of". Also, "suffrage" doesn't mean what you think it means.

    139. Re:I can see the historians now by hazah · · Score: 1

      Hitler saw both Japan and Italy as pawns in his own game. They were never going to have a share of power. For Hitler, the entire earth was for his taking.

    140. Re:I can see the historians now by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Japan couldn't have risked an invasion of Hawaii at that time.
      They where at the max range of their fleet. As it was they where very close to having to abandon their destroyers.
      And their was still Australia and NZ so not the US Still would have had a base to operate out of and Japan would have a terrible supply line to defend.
      At best they should have taken out the dry docks and the tank farm.

      At worst The US would have shifted it's focus. We would have kept England in the war but mainly would have tried to contain Germany. No invasion of Italy.
      Russia would have made do with a lot less Lend Lease so they might not have done as well.
      The end result would the have probably been Both Germany and Japan getting Nuked.
      Oh and with out the pressure from the US the ME-262 would have probably gotten even less support from Hitler.
      That is of course a guess but remember that the P-80 which was as good or better than the ME-262 was entering service in Europe at the end of WWII.
      So Germany might have faced B-29s and maybe B-36s ,with P-51s, P-47Ns, Meteors, Vampires, Furys, Honets , and P-80s.

      Nope Hitler's lack of nuclear weapons and the US's industral might pretty much sealed WWIIs fate.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    141. Re:I can see the historians now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He who controls the spice, controls the universe! Everyone knows that.

    142. Re:I can see the historians now by mqduck · · Score: 1

      I didn't say moral responsibility doesn't exist. I merely said that if you want to *understand history*, you have to put aside that question.

      --
      Property is theft.
    143. Re:I can see the historians now by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Er, crap. I hate Bill so much I aimed at him instead of Bush; The search terms I used to dig that article up included Bush and not Gates, but I had been shit upon by Windows XP only minutes prior to my comment.

      Indeed, it's relevant because the Bushes have been doing business with the so-called "bad guys" as long as they've been relevant. Beginning (at least under that name, and only as far as I know) with the whole S.S. thing, and then funneling money to Bin Laden in various ways including via our own government as a payment in exchange for temporarily suspending heroin production (one year, that is) and more recently via connections with (among others) Halliburton, which was selected as the only company ready and able to rebuild Iraq after we bombed it to pieces. Of course, the bombs (and other weapons, including soldiers) and the delivery mechanisms are built by a variety of defense contractors, blah blah blah.

      Anyway, sorry Bill. I still think you're working for the real axis of evil, but I don't think you're connected with Hitler. Although MS World Domination and the Marching Bill image are still both hilarious classics...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    144. Re:I can see the historians now by cusco · · Score: 1

      The noise isn't the big issue on Okinawa, it's the drugs, rapes, assaults, theft, prostitutes, bribery, and massive pollution that follows the US military where ever it goes. I'm sure the racism, arrogance, nationalism and inbred stupidity of the typical enlisted redneck doesn't help matters either.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    145. Re:I can see the historians now by cusco · · Score: 1

      Armed? So you think that having a stick is the same as having an A-4 assault rifle (which is what the Israelis boarded with)? Yeesh. The Israeli military 1) attacked an unarmed ship, 2) shot unarmed civilians, several of them in the back of the head, 3) kidnapped the crew and passengers, 4) stole thousands of dollars in cash and equipment, 5) forced the ship owners to pay a ransom for its return, 6) illegally detained the crew and passengers, beating many of them, and 7) did it in international waters where they couldn't even claim they were defending their own territory.

      If this had happened off the coast of Somalia you'd call it piracy, but since the thugs are a bunch of white guys with big bank accounts you call it 'self defense'. Hypocrite.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    146. Re:I can see the historians now by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      That's very true, and I'll add the "accidents" that occur to your list as well; you know, helicopter crashes, things exploding in places they shouldn't explode, military vehicles ramming into things. I see something like that at least once a year in the news. The American military base children are also notorious for treating Japanese people like animals or objects. I think a big part of that is how America has made it nearly impossible to try military personnel and their families under Japanese law when a crime is committed outside of a base. But regardless the American military presence in Japan is necessary for the continued safety of Japan and that really shows in times like this.

    147. Re:I can see the historians now by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Armed?

      I think any dumbfuck with a deadly weapon attacking trained military personnel with large guns deserves whatever they get. And yes, a large stick is a deadly weapon. If you don't believe me, then take a large stick and whack a police officer with it and if they don't shoot you, tell me what charges they file against you.

      Hypocrite.

      Whether it was Israelis off the coast there or the US enforcing a blockade against Cuba, or pirates off the coast of Somalia (presuming that the pirates were trained military personnel enforcing a known embargo against people who claimed, publicly, to be breaking that blockade) then yes, I'd say the same things. Oh, and Mr. Fuckdard, please note that I didn't say anything defending their actions. Just indicating that with the number of irrational idiots like you, blockades don't work. People with deadly weapons will attack trained military personnel and end up surprised when they are killed. That's not a justification of anything. That's just facts.

    148. Re:I can see the historians now by John+Saffran · · Score: 1

      Japan's goal in WWII was basically a unification of Asia so it could be independent of Western "superiority". Also anecdotal evidence (mostly from my grandparents) says that the Japanese themselves weren't the ones raping and killing the captured population, just the Koreans who worked for them.

      In regards to the "co-prosperity" sphere, suffice to say that the countries that were part of that during peacetime, namely korea and taiwan, came out of WW2 as some of the poorest in the world, even worse than african colonies and that's saying something.

      In korea's case, as it's the best example of the loot and pillage methodology of japan, the per capita GDP was around $70. Comparatively Thailand was at about $210 GDP per capita and only India was lower than that at the time, but only because of the huge population difference. This despite the fact that the japanese exported an average of more than 100 million Yen in gold alone (official figures, but they're likely to be higher) from korea during the colonial era.

      Given a japanese victory the only co-prosperity the philippines would've seen is the 'three-all' policies .. Loot all, kill all, destroy all. You and your grandparents should consider yourself lucky not to have experienced the tender mercies of the japanese for an extended period.

      In regards to the smearing about the koreans being responsible for attrocious acts, the colonials (koreans, chinese, and taiwanese) were ordered to do the dirty deeds precisely so that naive and ignorant people would believe them when they claimed to be "innocent".

      Even casual inspection shows that this is a load of steaming manure, I'll just quote two authors on the topic:

      To the Japanese, Koreans were only slightly better than the Allied prisoners. For their part, the Koreans would have felt little loyalty towards Japan, which had invaded and brutalised their country for decades. One Korean POW guard, Kasayama Yoshikichi, said of his feelings toward the Japanese:

      "After the first couple of years, we didn’t hide our feelings any longer ‘Do you think we’re going to let you shit on us till we die?’ The Japanese apologised and grovelled when they didn’t have their rifles."

      One doctor witnessed three Korean guards attack a Japanese captain in his sleep, and one of the guards repeatedly asked the doctor for poison to kill this officer

      from "More Complex than a Stereotype: Australian POW Doctors and the Japanese in Captivity, 1942–451", Rosalind Hearder

      UTSUMI Aiko of Keisen University, Japan, conducted extensive research on Korean POW guards and found that more than 3,000 young Korean men were "recruited" (that is "press-ganged" or otherwise forced to "volunteer") for the prison guard corps. Many of [them] feared they would be shipped to Japan as indentured servants if they did not join the corps. Others were perhaps attracted by the high pay rates offered - 50 yen a month, a large amount at that time. [They] were classified as civilian employees rather than members of the military, and many hoped this status would prevent their transfer to the front line and ... allow them to be demobilized after their two-year contract was concluded. However, on joining, the new recruits were issued with uniforms, and their basic training was very much military in character, including weapons training. Despite the difference between the promise and the reality of the guard corps, few deserted, possibly because deserters were threatened with court-martial.

      ...

      The Koreans were trained in Japanese and forbidden to use their native tongue. They were also given Japanese names in place of their Korean names. They were instructed to treat POWs as animals as a way of ensuring their fear and respect. They were trained primarily in the Japanese Field Service Code, and they were frequently beaten

    149. Re:I can see the historians now by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 1

      Works for them tactically. Is a failure strategically as it defeats their image long-term (just ask the Americans about short-term goals undermining their global strategic aims). The Chinese appear incredibly untactful and heavy handed with their response - and the Japanese, American policy wonks, and much of the decision-makers in the rest of the world will sit up and take notice - even if the Chinese feel it is a 'victory' they a heavy price will be extracted later for such an insignificant issue. It is a shame as before this I felt the Chinese government was much smarter than this, now they seem rather clumsy.

    150. Re:I can see the historians now by Entropy997 · · Score: 0

      Actually, the Japanese were horribly cruel to the Chinese.

    151. Re:I can see the historians now by shentino · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the allied victory back in WW2 didn't hurt to make Japan more willing to negotiate with/yield to american interests.

    152. Re:I can see the historians now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there is also this amazing thing. All of the people commenting before you are very quick to demonize the Western world, and fail to notice that China is not really the best either. China's one of the largest, if not the single largest polluter on Earth. China allows child labor and exploitation of workers in general. China has a history of human rights violations. On top of all of that, China censors nearly all information that travels in or out of her territory. Let's not forget to mention that China has brutalized Tibetans for quite some time too. For all this talk about "evil Japan" and the West "deserving" whatever... China is fucking evil sometimes.

    153. Re:I can see the historians now by angus77 · · Score: 1

      The point was that someone was saying the US should pull out of Japan, in order to teach them some kind of lesson. My point was the US wouldn't want to, because it's in their best interest to stay (regardless of what Japan wants or needs).

      What exactly was your point?

  2. Simple answer by Niris · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Just nuke China. I'm tired of waiting for the new Fallout game.

    1. Re:Simple answer by bsDaemon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      MacArthur said if we didn't bomb China during the Korean War, we'd just end up fighting in Indochina next. Guess what? Indochina was the French Colonial name for Vietnam. Guess he was right. But seriously though, while nuking China isn't really feasible or productive, outsourcing production and relying too heavily on foreign sources of raw materials are generally bad ideas. Plus, its not like nearly every war in history has been fought over natural resources (to include territory) or anything...

    2. Re:Simple answer by melikamp · · Score: 1

      I'm tired of waiting for the new Fallout game that does not suck and blow at the same time.

    3. Re:Simple answer by dintech · · Score: 1

      relying too heavily on foreign sources of raw materials

      And this is where Japan hits the rocks (pun intended). They don't have much in the way of useful goodies in the ground and have no choice but to be dependent on other countries.

    4. Re:Simple answer by Idiomatick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "relying too heavily on foreign sources of raw materials are generally bad ideas"

      Erm and do what? Japan has a reallly really high GDP for a country with such a small landmass that is not particularly rich. What would they base their economy on?

    5. Re:Simple answer by kuthkameen · · Score: 0

      Indochina is not just Vietnam - French Indochina comprised of Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos.

      --
      "Do not confuse the unusual with the impossible" - Psmith
    6. Re:Simple answer by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      The US bombed Cambodia, and it also bombed Laos.

    7. Re:Simple answer by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Do you realize that when he said bomb he was talking about using the atomic bombs on china and not Japan?

      Do you also realize he was using it to gain military power over when to use atomic weapons?

      Bomb China would have been a huge mistake. Leaving us to fight Japan on land AND china? Also, our allies where way to beat up an exhausted to aid us? And it would have meant our allies would have to be worried about both China, and the growing tensions from Russia?

      '

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:Simple answer by jpapon · · Score: 1

      Bomb China would have been a huge mistake. Leaving us to fight Japan on land AND china?

      Um. He said that at the end of the Korean war. We had no reason to bomb Japan during the Korean war. Japan had already been bombed into submission several years prior.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    9. Re:Simple answer by demonbug · · Score: 1

      relying too heavily on foreign sources of raw materials

      And this is where Japan hits the rocks (pun intended). They don't have much in the way of useful goodies in the ground and have no choice but to be dependent on other countries.

      Well, they should go out and acquire some more land then, maybe in Manchuria, French Indochina, etc. I hear the Philippines are ripe for the picking. Do I have to think of everything here?

      Yeah, Japan is screwed long-term. They've been very successful the last fifty years or so because everyone has been more than willing to sell raw materials to them; as the major developing nations work on developing their own economies and industry, this isn't going to be the case. That, and by their constitution they have no real recourse - they can enter an economic war and thereby cut their own throats, or they need to ditch their constitution which will scare the rest of east Asia into joining up against them. Either way they are in a lot of trouble.

    10. Re:Simple answer by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      ? Fallout 3 ruled.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    11. Re:Simple answer by couchslug · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      China isn't worth nuking nor Asia worth wasting US resources on a problem ASIANS should solve themselves.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    12. Re:Simple answer by oldhack · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wasabi.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    13. Re:Simple answer by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      what the hell are you talking about? Did you even read what I wrote?

    14. Re:Simple answer by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      Vietnam was mainly supported by the USSR. Even we in Hungary had Vietnamese shifts.

    15. Re:Simple answer by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Interesting that advocating the US NOT intervene in an Asian land war is considered Flamebait, or that Asians have responsibility to manage Asia!

      Since when did /. join the John Birch Society? The American fondness for neo-colonial wars in Asia hasn't worked out well, has pissed off the locals, consumed vast blood and treasure, and mostly been a waste of effort.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    16. Re:Simple answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last I heard, it was religion that caused all wars.

    17. Re:Simple answer by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      Tentacle porn and mail order brides? I don't know. Remember, their expansionism at the head of WWII was due to the quest for rubber and petrol. They wouldn't be trading now if we hadn't kicked their asses.

      However, the economic well being of Japan isn't honestly my concern. I was referring to the U.S. and how our steady decline in manufacturing power has lead to a shit ton of other problems.

    18. Re:Simple answer by kuthkameen · · Score: 1

      That was not my point. Indochina is a generic name for a region in South East Asia. The list of countries the US has bombed is a long one.

      --
      "Do not confuse the unusual with the impossible" - Psmith
    19. Re:Simple answer by dbIII · · Score: 1

      You forget that the war in Indochina was already going on when MacArthur said that and that a weasel excuse was later invented by some idiot that wanted to deploy US troops to a French colonial war to test relative strengths. The entire thing was along the lines of "we want to hurt China and the USSR while pretending we don't" - a weasel war planned by idiots that hurt the USA a great deal but did very little to China and the USSR.

    20. Re:Simple answer by CyberDragon777 · · Score: 1

      Catgirls.

      --
      We both said a lot of things that you are going to regret.
    21. Re:Simple answer by bball99 · · Score: 1

      the Japanese have an embargo on good wasabi - the rest of us mere mortals have to get by with lesser quality radish

  3. Knew it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew something like this was going to happen. China holds much more than a majority of rare earth production too. If this escalates, Japan is going to be hit hard.

    1. Re:Knew it by interkin3tic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Japan isn't self-sufficient in the food area either. I hear they get most of their food, especially rice, from China. I've heard some estimates that if the food they get from China were to disappear and weren't replaced, they'd be facing starvations in about a month (though I don't have a citation on that, so that may be wildly inaccurate). Not to mention that Japan is militarily defenseless against China, and even if China didn't feel like getting their hands dirty, they could always tell North Korea to start acting up at Japan. In other words, Japan doesn't really have a strong foothold to be poking China like this. I guess they have a lot of faith that China will agree to a diplomatic solution.

      More likely though, the bureaucratic head of the Japanese coast guard was pissed off at another part of the bureaucracy and wanted them to lose face. Or maybe he just decided that the last decade-long recession to hit Japan was pretty nice, so he should do his best to make sure the current one lasts that long too by sabotaging manufacturing dependent on those rare earth exports.

    2. Re:Knew it by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Given all that, it's also rather odd that Japan wants to get rid of American military bases in Japan.

      --
      Qxe4
    3. Re:Knew it by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've heard some estimates that if the food they get from China were to disappear and weren't replaced, they'd be facing starvations in about a month (though I don't have a citation on that, so that may be wildly inaccurate).

      Urban Japan, at least. In the smaller towns it's still quite common to farm your own rice. The smallish (population around 23,000) town I stayed in was surrounded by rice paddies. Apparently there were a couple of weeks when everything else in the town stopped as everyone went out to either plant or harvest rice. Pretty much every family owned at least one (smallish) field, which grew the majority of the rice that they ate. I'm sure India would love to sell them a lot more food, if China wanted to stop...

      Not to mention that Japan is militarily defenseless against China, and even if China didn't feel like getting their hands dirty, they could always tell North Korea to start acting up at Japan

      The USA has treaty obligations towards Japan that make declaring war on Japan equivalent to declaring war on the USA. Even North Korea isn't that stupid.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:Knew it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Japan has a food self-sufficiency rate of about 40%, which, while one of the lowest amongst the advanced nations, is pretty damn good considering 70% of Japan is mountain/hills and much of the rest is occupied by cities.

      I would think Japan doesn't import that much rice from China, especially after the gyoza scare. An couple in my wife's hometown grow all their own food to avoid any Chinese products, sometimes giving us some 100% soba noodles they prepare by hand. Even around the boundaries of Tokyo, you can see lots with rice growing in them surrounded by buildings.

    5. Re:Knew it by demonbug · · Score: 1

      Not sure if it is still true, but for many years California was actually the source of a large portion of Japan's food. I believe we still supply roughly half of their imported rice. So they might go a bit hungry, but it is doubtful they would starve if China cut off their supplies.

    6. Re:Knew it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      China can't touch Japan. They don't have the navy for it. Basically, China couldn't defeat Japan before Japan nuked China. Japan is not currently a nuclear nation, but they have been a week away for thirty years. They've got nuclear power plants and a space agency. All they need to do is replace the astronauts with warheads and aim somewhat lower than the moon.

    7. Re:Knew it by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 4, Informative

      Japan isn't self-sufficient in the food area either. I hear they get most of their food, especially rice, from China. I've heard some estimates that if the food they get from China were to disappear and weren't replaced, they'd be facing starvations in about a month (though I don't have a citation on that, so that may be wildly inaccurate). Not to mention that Japan is militarily defenseless against China, and even if China didn't feel like getting their hands dirty, they could always tell North Korea to start acting up at Japan. In other words, Japan doesn't really have a strong foothold to be poking China like this. I guess they have a lot of faith that China will agree to a diplomatic solution.

      More likely though, the bureaucratic head of the Japanese coast guard was pissed off at another part of the bureaucracy and wanted them to lose face. Or maybe he just decided that the last decade-long recession to hit Japan was pretty nice, so he should do his best to make sure the current one lasts that long too by sabotaging manufacturing dependent on those rare earth exports.

      Japan grows about 10% more rice than it consumes. Read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rice#Production_and_export.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    8. Re:Knew it by wrook · · Score: 2, Informative

      All rice sold in Japan is domestic. Japan buys rice from the US (due to a trade agreement), but dumps it (also known as "stockpiling", but it is *never* used and is generally not allowed to be sold). Last year there was a shortage of rice in south east Asia, so the Japanese asked for and got permission to sell some of their stockpile in Asia. Supermarkets label the origin of almost all food in Japan, so I can tell you that Chinese imports make up a large volume of non-staple foods. The vast majority of food imported from China (based on reading labels in the supermarket) is frozen vegetables, mushrooms, pickles and seaweed. If the Chinese were to stop exportation of food to Japan tomorrow, it would definitely have an impact, but not starvation.

      Japan actually has a law on the books that disallows importation of staple foods into the country. It was put in place after WWII when many many people starved to death due to US blockades. Having said that, Japan is nowhere near self sufficient for food as lately they have relaxed their importation policies (due to heavy lobbying by the US).

    9. Re:Knew it by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      The fact that Japan is not self sufficient in the food area makes negative comments about their declining population seem pretty silly.

    10. Re:Knew it by vakuona · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Food self sufficiency is sometimes a misleading statistic. Sometimes it's just cheaper to import. I am sure Japan could get that figure closer to 100% if they had to. Heck, I am sure China wasn't exporting them food during WW2.

      If China embargoes food exports to Japan, I am sure many other countries would also willingly step into the breach. Argentina, Brazil, Russia, heck, USA are waiting in the wings.

      And not to forget that Japan probably consumes much more food than it really needs to. Developed countries are surprisingly wasteful when it comes to food consumption. I think in the UK, about 30-40% of food is actually thrown away. In a crisis situation, with food prices rising, people will be less likely to waste it.

    11. Re:Knew it by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 1

      "Not to mention that Japan is militarily defenseless against China" I suggest you check your facts (no really, please go and look up the JDF and reconsider your position). Japan has a reasonably large and strong military - although placed in a defensive posture. It is arguably far better trained, equipped, and led than the Chinese military. China could not simply walk-over Japan as you seem to think. It would be messy if they ever came to blows.

    12. Re:Knew it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Japan isn't self-sufficient in the food area either"

      Where did you hear that?

      That's an entire anime series about the farm production in Japan. The biggest threats are that farmer's kids are leaving the farm and the low birthrate in Japan (leading to depopulation), not because there is insufficient farmland. They are afraid of workforce drain and brain drain (farming knowledge). While it's tight and there isn't much farmland, the Japanese learned from their past and are very careful about keeping farmland around.

      In fact, with depopulation being a serious issue in Japan, so much so they are revisiting their immigrant policies, they aren't taking over their farmland for expansion. And their food issue improves, since there are less people to feed.

      "I've heard some estimates that if the food they get from China were to disappear and weren't replaced"

      Are you sure you don't have this backwards? China imports HUGE amounts of food to support their population. I think China is still self-sufficient, but their population wouldn't be too happy if imports stopped.

      Also, remember, Japan is a string of islands. With vast resources in shipping. You know what'll happen if China imports stopped? Japan would FISH MORE.

      OTOH, China imports a huge amount of food from surrounding countries. They are pretty self-sufficient, but I wouldn't want to be in China at the time they couldn't import food. I think maybe you confused Japan with China, or Singapore. Singapore is definitely not self-sufficient on the food front, and doesn't have the room to store much food either. Still, if China couldn't import a lot of their food, I wouldn't want to be around when their population starts finding food limitations.

    13. Re:Knew it by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Heck, I am sure China wasn't exporting them food during WW2."

      Not much after the US got done with the Jap merchant fleet. Choking Hirohito's Imperial ambitions required choking Japanese logistics, and those mostly moved by sea:

      http://www.anesi.com/ussbs01.htm#dotjmf

      "UNITED STATES STRATEGIC BOMBING SURVEY
      SUMMARY REPORT
      (Pacific War)

      WASHINGTON, D.C.
      1 JULY 1946

      DESTRUCTION OF THE JAPANESE MERCHANT FLEET
      Japan's merchant shipping fleet, was not only a key link in the logistical support of her armed forces in the field, but also a vital link in her economic structure. It was the sole element of this basic structure which was vulnerable to direct attack throughout a major portion of the war.

      Japan entered the war with some 6,000,000 tons of merchant shipping of over 500 tons gross weight. During the war an additional 4,100,000 tons were constructed, captured or requisitioned. Sufficient information was secured by the Survey in Japan concerning this 10,100,000 tons to tabulate ship by ship, (a) the name end tonnage, (b>) the date, location; and agent of sinking or damage, and (c) the present condition and location of such ships as survived. The sources from which evidence was obtained were in some respects conflicting. Where possible these conflicts have been resolved. The Joint Army and Navy Assessment Committee has tentatively arrived at similar results and is continuing its efforts further to refine the evidence. The Survey believes that the figures included in the following breakdown will not differ significantly from the final evaluation of the Joint Army and Navy Assessment Committee.

      Eight million nine hundred thousand tons of this shipping were sunk or so seriously damaged as to be out of action at the end of the war. Fifty-four and seven-tenths percent of this total was attributable to submarines, 16.3 percent to carrier based planes, 10.2 percent to Army land-based planes and 4.3 percent to Navy and Marine land-based planes, 9.3 percent to mines (largely dropped by B-29s), less than 1 percent to surface gunfire, and the balance of 4 percent to marine accidents. "

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    14. Re:Knew it by dbIII · · Score: 1

      China didn't feel like getting their hands dirty, they could always tell North Korea to start acting up at Japan

      The stupid master-slave view comes up again. They don't own the place, it's just another example of China selling stuff to anyone.

    15. Re:Knew it by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      That's an entire anime series about the farm production in Japan.

      Well then I really have no excuse for getting that wrong if there was an entire anime series about it.

    16. Re:Knew it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      wow. How can you write so many untruths in one post....
      Disclaimer: I lived in both countries.

      Japan may import some of its food, but never ever would want to rely on Chinese rice. Incidentally, rice is something sacred for most Japanese, it is treated like shit by many Chinese.

      Japan's navy is a bit smaller than the Chinese, but still the second largest of Asia. And more importantly, the US has an obligation to assist Japan in any serious conflict. Those soldiers on Okinawa are not there just because it is a nice sunny island... There are also US nukes around. You do not need a lot of fate if you keep friends with your big brother. At least, for now. Also, I seriously doubt China has so much friendship with the North Koreans. In fact, they seem to try to distance themselves a bit from that country recently. And with good reasons, the regime is at least somewhat erratic... Last time they refused economic help to NK, several Chinese soldiers on the border where accidentally shot down.

      Lastly, the captain is held by a court decision, not by the coastguard boss. There is (legally) nothing the government can do. Of course, most mainland Chinese have trouble understanding that courts are not part of the government everywhere...

      If the US had some balls, they should side with Japan on this. Not necessary because they are right (who owns those rocks is legally murky), but because you should play politics here. And backing off on this will have serious consequences for the explorations of massive oil and gas reserves in the territorial waters close to those rocks. Japan is nowhere near as dangerous a competer for world domination compared to China. It is simply in the rest of the worlds interest to not agree on this. Giving your opponent too much for free is a good way to get pushed out of the game.

      Do not get my wrong. I enjoy many things in China, and may probably agree with their government more compared to the average opinion here on slashdot. But it is not good for balance to give away these rocks.

    17. Re:Knew it by BangaIorean · · Score: 1

      Someone MOD PARENT UP.

  4. Zen Magnets by sexconker · · Score: 4, Funny

    So this is the reason Zen Magnets are out of stock?

    1. Re:Zen Magnets by pregister · · Score: 4, Funny

      I love this quote from the Zen Magnet website. "You'll never put them down for good. Zen Magnets are fun to play with, look good on cute people, go well with deep breaths, and may have health benefits. "

      They look good on cute people. The rest of us...sol.

    2. Re:Zen Magnets by NFN_NLN · · Score: 3, Informative

      Despite there name rare earth metals are necessarily rare. It's just that China's cheap labour and environmental laws makes mining them cheaper.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Elemental_abundances.svg

      According to this chart Nd (neodymium) is about as abundant as Pb (lead) and Zinc (Zn).

      When you consider the $'s and effort in northern Canada to mine natural diamonds even though you can create superior diamonds in a lab for cheaper, it puts things in perspective.

    3. Re:Zen Magnets by AJWM · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're correct that rare earth elements aren't rare in the cosmic abundance sense. The original name came about because they were first isolated from a mineral only found in a particular mine in Ytterby, Sweden (hence the names of many of them: scandium (from scandanavia), yttrium, terbium, ytterbium, erbium).

      The modern "rarity" issue comes in because they all have very similar chemical properties (mostly lanthanides, plus the rest of Group 3 (III-B oldstyle) of the periodic table). They tend to occur together, and because of the similar chemical properties, are difficult to separate. Not quite as difficult as, say, uranium isotopes, but not as trivial as separating lead or zinc from mixed sulfide ores.

      --
      -- Alastair
  5. Trade war? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will get ugly once Japan puts an embargo on China's sunrise.

    1. Re:Trade war? by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      Which would screw over Mexico, since Tequila, one of the main ingredients in a Sunrise, is basically their only legal export.

    2. Re:Trade war? by Niris · · Score: 1

      Never had a malibu sunrise? It's pretty damn good.

    3. Re:Trade war? by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Simpsons did it.

  6. For once I am glad... by tiksi · · Score: 1

    ... that all of our electronics are made in china. At first I was worried about what this would mean for electronics, then I remembered that nothing is actually made in Japan, just designed there, sometimes.

    1. Re:For once I am glad... by treeves · · Score: 2, Informative

      You should continue to be worried.
      There are a lot of things that *go into* electronics (components, among which ICs are the most profitable) or are used to *make* electronic components but you're right most of the *assembly* doesn't take place in Japan.
      Nikon (not just cameras), Hitachi, Fujitsu, Renesas, NEC, Canon (again, not just cameras), Shimadzu, (a few off the top off my head - and I'm tired so I'm leaving off a bunch) most of the companies listed here. And a lot of them make things *in Japan*.
      And then there's the specialty chemical companies.
      China does have some dependencies on Japan as well, although admittedly that has shifted a lot the other way.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  7. Not quite that clear cut, but important nonetheles by alexismadrigal · · Score: 5, Informative

    We should probably note here that the Wall Street Journal printed all kinds of denials from the Chinese. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704062804575509640345070222.html Me, I'm just annoyed that we can't get a real industrial policy together to support a rare earth metals industry in the US. Got annoyed enough to write a piece for The Atlantic about it: http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2010/09/worried-about-chinas-monopoly-on-rare-elements-restart-american-production/63444/ One thing to watch out for on the rare earth metal tip is that the Department of Defense is releasing a report on their use for military purposes in the beginning of October. Will be interesting to see what they say.

  8. what about hard drives? by v1 · · Score: 1

    every (non ssd) hard drive has four rare earth magnets in the arm positioning system... I wonder what this will do for hard drive production?

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:what about hard drives? by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      they'll be 5 dollars more expensive.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:what about hard drives? by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      I wonder what this will do for hard drive recycling. It can only help put emphasis on advancing SSD drives.

    3. Re:what about hard drives? by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Because SSDs are made out of farts and rainbows?

    4. Re:what about hard drives? by TheEyes · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because they're made out of silicon and gold, both of which are plentiful (we have enough gold already mined to last 100 years, if everyone would stop hoarding it in silly attempts to create yet another bubble.)

    5. Re:what about hard drives? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      No but not rare yearth metals. At least not a lot of them.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:what about hard drives? by treeves · · Score: 1

      If by "farts and rainbows" you mean electronic components not including rare earth magnets, then yes, farts and rainbows.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    7. Re:what about hard drives? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      No kidding. Gold is so cheap that people walk around with it dangling from their bodies. Heck, sometimes people put it on their food and eat it just because they think it looks cool.

    8. Re:what about hard drives? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      in their food? i've seen gold in liquor before, but if you consider liquor to be food, you probably need to go to some group sessions

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    9. Re:what about hard drives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. Hoarding rare earth metals is a much better idea.

    10. Re:what about hard drives? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      isn't tantalum (used a lot for capacitors) also a rare earth...

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    11. Re:what about hard drives? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Gold leaf is quite common on desserts in pretentious restaurants (good restaurants put the money into the ingredients that actually taste of something). You're right that it's also found in some drinks, for example there's a German sparking white wine that contains flecks of gold leaf.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    12. Re:what about hard drives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... which can be manufactured fairly cheaply. All you need is a can of beans and a lawn sprinkler ;)

    13. Re:what about hard drives? by treeves · · Score: 1

      Not by the usual definition. Tantalum is a transition metal that happens to lie between hafnium and tungsten on the periodic table.
      Rare earths generally means lanthanides: Lanthanum through Lutetium, and including Neodymium, Europium, Gadolinium and Samarium among others (Samarium-Cobalt is a common type of rare earth magnet.)

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  9. Darn - need to stock up on rare earth magnets at.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  10. Lead into Gold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's possible to use a nuclear reactor to generate these rare metals. But, it's so expensive that nobody does. How much would neodymium have to cost, per kilogram, before it would be economical to use reactors to synthesize the element?

    1. Re:Lead into Gold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      $428.32

  11. Japan is a dead rock by L3370 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In terms of natural resources, Japan is practically void of anything valuable. Lucky for the Japanese, China is still pissed over that whole "Rape of Nanking" deal.

    1. Re:Japan is a dead rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they still havent apologized, i believe, and their texbooks (afaik) are in denial.

    2. Re:Japan is a dead rock by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      And the USA is running dry on oil. What's your point?

    3. Re:Japan is a dead rock by L3370 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My point is--it's not surprising. Japan has always been vulnerable to this. Only this time around, thanks to WWII surrender conditions, they have no hand to play against China (Not allowed to have an offensive capable military.) In the good 'ol days Japan would have just gone to war with them if they pulled this. (They did it to the USA, because we wouldn't trade resources.)

      Just pointing out the interesting role reversal here. That is all.

    4. Re:Japan is a dead rock by DesScorp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In terms of natural resources, Japan is practically void of anything valuable. Lucky for the Japanese, China is still pissed over that whole "Rape of Nanking" deal.

      China is one of the oldest civilizations on Earth, and at one time had perhaps the most powerful. And yet, after their golden age, they withered and spent the rest of history being what we would call a Third World Country. Only now are they finally ready for world power status again.

      Contrast them against Japan, who only a little more than a century ago, was a dirt poor, backwards country that had to be literally forced at the barrel of a gun to open their doors to the world. By the 1930's... scant decades away... they became one of the most powerful industrialized countries in the world, creating a war machine that conquered a huge part of the globe in just a few years.

      And then we nuked them. They went from world power, to shambles, a conquered country with two radioactive wastes where cities had been. And in less than three decades after that, they became one of the wealthiest and most technologically advanced countries on the planet... again... arguably more powerful economically than they were at the hight of their military might.

      They did all this... twice... in the span of a single century, with no natural resources to speak of, save one: the Japanese people themselves.

      I wouldn't count Japan out just yet.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    5. Re:Japan is a dead rock by anss123 · · Score: 1

      contrast them against Japan, who only a little more than a century ago, was a dirt poor, backwards country that had to be literally forced at the barrel of a gun to open their doors to the world.

      I wouldn't call them backwards. Before the industrial revolution they had greater GDP PPP than Great Brittan (or whatever they were called back then), and was considered an advanced enviable culture. They fell a bit behind, yes, but had a fairly advanced economy, culture, school system, and so on. They even had cannons, guns and pirates! Yarh.

      They weren't totally isolationistic either, just sulking a bit over a bloody nose the Koreans gave them in some war over there and stamping out Christianity before it could take root.

    6. Re:Japan is a dead rock by L3370 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One more needs to mod this post up.

      This is exactly why I think Japan's greatest export isn't DVD players, Lexus IS350's or video games--It's the culture's desire for "Perfection." Everything they make can be done by others...and for far cheaper. The Japanese, however, seek to do it perfectly.

    7. Re:Japan is a dead rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In terms of natural resources, Japan is practically void of anything valuable.

      Teenage girls in miniskirt piloting mechs.

    8. Re:Japan is a dead rock by jack2000 · · Score: 1

      We love them for it. Wish more countries did that as well.

    9. Re:Japan is a dead rock by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Lucky for the Japanese, China is still pissed over that whole "Rape of Nanking" deal."

      There are plenty of living Chinese who experienced that and much more. Hirohito's BW unit for example:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_731

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    10. Re:Japan is a dead rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nitpick: a little over a hundred years ago in 1905 Japan fought the Russians in the battle of Tsushima. The Russian navy was annihilated and the battle pretty much ended the Russo-Japanese war and was a major contributor to the Russian Revolution of 1905. The Japanese were practically unscathed and then had the sixth largest navy in the world. Matthew Perry's first expedition was in 1853, 157 years ago.

    11. Re:Japan is a dead rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet, after their golden age, they withered and spent the rest of history being what we would call a Third World Country.

      Well clearly they should have gone ahead and spent the Great Artist they had laying around to start another Golden Age. It's double the gold and hammers for 9 turns!

    12. Re:Japan is a dead rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Japan has apologized many, many times for the atrocities they perpetrated in that period. What does China want? Individual apologies issued to the surviving relatives of every victim? Even Israel does not hold such a grudge against Germany as the Chinese insist on holding against Japan.

      Next question: when will the Communist Party of China apologise to its own people for the millions of innocents it murdered during the Cultural Revolution? Funny how the Chinese don't seem so eager to hold mass demonstrations about that.

    13. Re:Japan is a dead rock by careysub · · Score: 3, Informative

      ...

      China is one of the oldest civilizations on Earth, and at one time had perhaps the most powerful. And yet, after their golden age, they withered and spent the rest of history being what we would call a Third World Country.

      Only now are they finally ready for world power status again.

      Contrast them against Japan, who only a little more than a century ago, was a dirt poor, backwards country that had to be literally forced at the barrel of a gun to open their doors to the world.

      Not quite. China was as advanced an wealthy a country as any in the world up to about 1800 (and far more advanced than most) - that is until the start of the Industrial Revolution. China did not "wither" until well into the 1800s when direct competition with - an invasion by - the industrializing west destroyed its economy and governmental effectiveness.

      Similarly Japan was a wealthy pre-industrial society, and successfully adapted to forced trade with the West (unlike China), shifting to become a successful industrial nation in one generation. Never were they "dirt poor".

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    14. Re:Japan is a dead rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did all this... twice... in the span of a single century, with no natural resources to speak of, save one: the Japanese people themselves.

      One problem: there aren't a lot of Japanese people and they appear to like having kids only slightly more than pandas do. They're building robots to take care of their elderly for chrissakes.

    15. Re:Japan is a dead rock by couchslug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "They did all this... twice... in the span of a single century, with no natural resources to speak of, save one: the Japanese people themselves."

      http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/53050/milton-ezrati/japans-aging-economics

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    16. Re:Japan is a dead rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> And then we nuked them.

      Don't be proud if it.

      It'll come back to you - in ways more challenging than you'll ever imagine..

    17. Re:Japan is a dead rock by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      The Japanese still try to act like victims, with regard to Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They conveniently forget that Japan was working on atomic weapons and how many more Japanese and American would have died in a land invasion.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    18. Re:Japan is a dead rock by gullevek · · Score: 1

      They were not backwards, not at all. They had a very high literate rate compared to other countries at that time and a pretty good road system.

      They only difference was that they completely shut themselves out of any outside influence (besides some ports where some countries where allowed to trade).

      --
      "Freiheit ist immer auch die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" - Rosa Luxemburg, 1871 - 1919
    19. Re:Japan is a dead rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japan, who only a little more than a century ago, was a dirt poor, backwards country

      What.

      I'm sorry, what. Japan was fine a century ago. They might have been comparatively poor compared to other nations at the time because they didn't trade, but within their own borders they were still doing fine.

      If we want to talk about a dirt poor east Asian country becoming an economic power, that's Korea. From China's bitch to Japan's bitch to the US's bitch to finally being something of their own within the 50 years since the end of the Korean War.

    20. Re:Japan is a dead rock by dido · · Score: 1

      They did all this... twice... in the span of a single century, with no natural resources to speak of, save one: the Japanese people themselves.

      The only problem is they're losing even this edge. Their population has been stagnant at about 100 million since the late 1960's, and the only reason why they haven't seen a massive population decline is that their life expectancy is the highest in the world. They have over 21% of their population over the age of 65. Too many old Japanese, not enough young blood that has the same energy that was able to do everything which you described so eloquently.

      --
      Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
    21. Re:Japan is a dead rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pfft. They were not even invaded proper.
      Signed,
      A German
      (Two lost land wars in 30 years. Split in two countries for 40 years. No abundant natural resources. Still managed to be arguably the economic, scientific and political leader in Europe for the last 100 years...)

    22. Re:Japan is a dead rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China never had a "golden age" in the sense of the Roman or British Empires, largely because China was never interested in conquering foreign lands as a way of expanding wealth. In fact, you could say that right now is China's golden age, as there's probably no other period in its history where the average citizen had a standard of living as high as it is now, and is no small factor in the population's overall satisfaction with the communist government.

      You say "only now are they ready for world power status again..." so then I ask you, at what point in China's history was the country ever a world power? Tibet is about as far as they've ever gone outside their ancestral homelands.

      The contrast to Japan is that Japan is far more like western nations -- that is to say, they saw military force as a means to conquer nations that lacked it. Japan adapted quickly to the use of modernized weapons because they saw it as a need and an opportunity. They conquered their part of the globe in a few years because that part of the globe was completely unprepared for the modern weapons that were about to be used against them. They were less like the Germans storming across Europe, more like the settlers in the New World taking advantage of undeveloped nations.

      The point that you seem to miss in all of this is that the Chinese have such a long history, despite the nation's poverty and despite the foreign invasions and occupations, because their people are indomitable. The fact that you acknowledge the longevity of the Chinese civilization and then reduce your analysis to the last century merely shows a lack of understanding. A flash in the pan is not what gave China its staying power, nor it will grant any such power to Japan or any other nation. A single catastrophic event, like being conquered and subsequently pillaged, tends to result in the complete dissolution of a civilization, like the Roman Empire for example. China, however, has survived through multiple long-term foreign occupations -- the Mongols, the Manchus, the Japanese. You want to know why the country has been so low-key this past century? How about the end of their millennia-old imperial system of government? The founding of a new republic? A crippling war with an invading army? And then the civil war between the nationalists and the communists? Followed by the upheaval and chaos brought about by not one, but two communist revolutions? Any one of these things could have destroyed a lesser nation, and China went through them all "in a single century". What did Japan do in that century? Trade for technology and build it? Twice? But all it took was the destruction of two Japanese cities and they surrendered their nation, their people, and their sovereignty in all but name. Do you know how many Chinese were massacred? How many Chinese cities pillaged and burned? Each one only made the Chinese more determined to win, and so they did. That's how it happened thousands of years ago too. Other people, when something like that happens, they just curl up and die. They don't know how to live through real adversity, much less thrive in it.

      And now the nation, as a global player, is stronger than it's ever been. And here's the other thing that you're missing. The only reason Japan still exists is because they surrendered to the US and became its protectorate. If not for that fact, it would probably have become a Special Administrative Region of China by now. All of the accomplishments of postwar Japan are essentially built on the economic gifts and science given to them by the US, and the fact that for the past 65 years, starting a fight with them meant starting a fight with the wealthiest nation in the world. What the US gets out of this deal is that Japan today is a puppet state serving America's interests in Asia, and China knows that better than anyone.

      Underestimate Japan? I don't think so. Japan is a nation of people who are content to live under the heels of wealthy foreigners. They have money and knowledge inherited from their masters and that'

    23. Re:Japan is a dead rock by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The Japanese still try to act like victims, with regard to Hiroshima and Nagasaki

      So? They were. That's the thing about war - both sides end up being victims pretty quickly. There were three objectives in dropping the bomb:

      • Making Japan's surrender unconditional (they'd already offered a conditional surrender).
      • Making Japan surrender to the USA (they'd already offered to surrender to Russia).
      • Providing a demonstration of American military superiority to the USSR, to ensure that their troops in East Germany stayed there or went home.
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    24. Re:Japan is a dead rock by sgtrock · · Score: 1

      China never had a "golden age" in the sense of the Roman or British Empires, largely because China was never interested in conquering foreign lands as a way of expanding wealth./blockquote

      Excuse me? I suggest you do a little reading about Ghengis Khan and his ancestors. At the time of his grandson's death, they controlled one fifth of the entire landmass of this planet, including all of China. Or go back further and read about the Han Dynasty's expansion policies. Before that, the Warring States.

    25. Re:Japan is a dead rock by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      (Not allowed to have an offensive capable military.)

      ...uh, yeah... you should probably have a look at their current military and rethink that statement.

      It's true that, on paper, they're not allowed to have any sort of military for any function. The letter of that law was broken almost immediately. And the spirit of that law has been relaxed of late.

    26. Re:Japan is a dead rock by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were industrial centers. They were providing material support for the Japanese war machine. I grew up in Pittsburgh. If the Axis could have done it, they would have bombed Pittsburgh back to the stone age. It would have been a perfectly valid target. Without the raw materials of war, the enemy can't proceed.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    27. Re:Japan is a dead rock by cusco · · Score: 1

      Actually, in the 14th and 15th centuries the Chinese traded as far away as Timbuktu. They controlled trade throughout the Indian Ocean, and when the Forbidden City was inaugurated in 1421 ambassadors came from throughout the known world. The ambassador from (IIRC) Zimbabwe brought a giraffe as a gift. Then the eunuchs took over the government and turned the country inward for the next several centuries.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  12. Re:Not quite that clear cut, but important nonethe by russotto · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Me, I'm just annoyed that we can't get a real industrial policy together to support a rare earth metals industry in the US.

    Environmentalists would stop it dead. It involves mining and extraction.

  13. No worries by arcite · · Score: 2, Insightful

    pseudo capitalism is in the process of destroying China from within. As inflation increases, natural resources deplete, environmental catastrophes take their toll, grain shortages increase, and the water continues to run out, well, things will just progress in a predictable fashion. The US need only contain China, which they are successfully doing by forcing them to buy their debt by the billions. It's a stroke of genius actually.

    1. Re: No worries by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      pseudo capitalism is in the process of destroying China from within. As inflation increases, natural resources deplete, environmental catastrophes take their toll, grain shortages increase, and the water continues to run out, well, things will just progress in a predictable fashion. The US need only contain China, which they are successfully doing by forcing them to buy their debt by the billions. It's a stroke of genius actually.

      And when China becomes disfunctional you won't be able to buy anthing anymore, because every frikkin thing you buy these days is made in China.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:No worries by Bob-taro · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd like to ask a specific question about what you said, but I'm pretty much lost from beginning to end. What is "psuedo capitalism" and how does it lead to inflation, depletion of resources, etc.? In what fashion do you predict things will progress? How is the U.S. forcing China to buy it's debt and in what way is that "containing" China? Presumably, if I can understand all that, I'll see how it's a stroke of genius.

      --
      Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
    3. Re: No worries by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      And then Wal-Mart collapses.

      They have been slowly raising their prices after killing off local stores ( competition ) anyways. If their main supplier of goods gets too expensive who knows where they will buy from?

      Hopefully it means the return of local departments stores and rekindles downtown districts.

      This embargo could be just what the US needs.

      - Dan.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    4. Re: No worries by maxume · · Score: 1

      You should complain that machines are the ones doing all the work in the U.S., not that nothing is made here.

      Actually, I don't think that is a good thing to complain about either.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re: No worries by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >And when China becomes disfunctional you won't be able to buy anthing anymore

      I already buy almost nothing... and in a real sense I'm "wealthier" as a result.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    6. Re:No worries by Belial6 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Whether you agree with the parent or not, if you don't understand what he is saying, you likely never will. Right or wrong, he was clear on what he wrote.

    7. Re: No worries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      there will always be another poor country willing to be america's factory and toxic waste dumping ground. it's funny really that america's "libruhl leftist traitor enviro-commie-faggot" laws will be giving the US it's greatest advantage over time, we don't despoil our land and water while china and russia and india do, as a result there will be eventual food price inflation for edible raw material. they ship us a ton of processed industrial material for every ton of grain we ship them. we use the material and wealth they send us to construct arcology cities and towns here, freeing up more space and cleaning what pollution we do have for ever expanding farms, the US feeds the world and in return they send us all their material resources, they can choose to stop at any time, or even attack us, as long as they don't mind eating solar bioreactor algea based foods.

    8. Re:No worries by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      As inflation increases

      China works pretty hard at preventing inflation. Which it can do... managed economy and all.

      The US need only contain China, which they are successfully doing by forcing them to buy their debt by the billions. It's a stroke of genius actually.

      Seriously wrong. That debt is given to African countries for 20 year leases on oil. Stuff like that. China's been very good about not keeping too much debt on hand.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    9. Re:No worries by wanax · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I assume what the original poster means by pseudo-capitalism is that there is state control over certain sectors of the economy, and intervention in others (often at the whim of party officials with greased palms). In particular, this means that China has systematically undervalued their currency by ~20-40% against the dollar. This has several effects, the most obvious being that it substantially increases the competitiveness of China's exports (and cost of imports). This benefits a specific group of well connected industries in China, which among others are the mining and dirty manufacturing industries that are depleting China's natural resources and exporting them as quickly as they can. The trade-off domestically however, is that it decreases the buying power of the average worker considerably and leads to inflation. It leads to inflation because to maintain the undervaluation, China's central bank has to intervene in the currency markets and buy dollars to prevent the Yuan from appreciating, which increases the domestic money supply. By having to buy dollars (ie: US treasuries) China is essentially stuck buying huge amounts of US debt as long as it wants to maintain the export edge from having an undervalued currency (which is causing huge domestic pressures within China, there have been quite a few labor riots and urban-rural tension in the past few years). This has two effects on the US: one is that it keeps interest rates low and our debt cheap, the other is that it makes our exports 20-40% more expensive, costing the US at least a million jobs (most estimates are about 1.2m) at present.

      So China is stuck with a dilemma: they can't become a first world country until they let their currency float, because their average citizens have reduced buying power. But they can't let their currency float until they have an economy that is sufficiently robust that it doesn't require a 20-40% import tariff/export subsidy (which is what the currency manipulation is doing), which means developing a domestic market under conditions of high inflation (currently ~8%) and high interest rates (currently 5.3%). And they have to do it before resource pressure (particularly food, water and pollution) overcomes economic growth, while funding a large chunk of the US current account deficit in the mean time. If China doesn't manage that, then both the current government and the economy collapses, and China goes through another cycle of regionalism and stagnation (and if China does manage it, we're probably looking at a world war over scarce resources).

    10. Re:No worries by mqduck · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Pseudo capitalism", as used here, is apparently a concept based on the fanciful notion that China is somehow still socialist/communist. It assumes that "big government" is somehow opposed to "free market", and therefor assumes that the combination of the two is some kind of voodoo monstrosity or something.

      Artcite's post is basically sound, but it suffers from that ideological prejudice.

      --
      Property is theft.
    11. Re:No worries by corbettw · · Score: 1

      This is the single most Insightful comment I've seen on Slashdot since, well, ever. Well done.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    12. Re: No worries by turkeyfish · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to consider that China owns about 35% of the US debt. If they go belly up, they will be calling in their IOU's. You might need to find a second and third job just to pay them back, particularly since US billionaires will never give up their tax breaks that the US is borrowing from the Chinese to pay for.

    13. Re:No worries by turkeyfish · · Score: 1

      You're right, most Americans haven't a clue what is going to happen when Obama cuts out US foreign aide and allows China to pick up the slack. Prices here are going to start to climb mercilessly as other nations will get creative on access to their raw materials and labor markets to the Chinese, who have our debt to pay for it with. They will just jack up interest rates and we will never recover. It won't be just home mortgages going under but entire swaths of our economy that is lagging in manufacturing.

    14. Re: No worries by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "And when China becomes disfunctional you won't be able to buy anthing anymore, because every frikkin thing you buy these days is made in China."

      Nonsense. It would just create new opportunity for other countries with cheap labor and a diverse industrial base such as India.

      There is nothing special about China its competitors couldn't replace, and they are already trying.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    15. Re:No worries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The intent of China's trade policy is to obtain for China the West's technology and advanced means of production. This is seen by both Marxism and Germanic / Japanese economic theory as the key to the "wealth of nations," as it was as well by England and the US through the early 1900's, before the merchant and financial classes adopted Adam Smith's consumerist theories, driving the anglo saxon world into its severe industrial decline.

      Finance is not the real economy, production and distribution are, and China's great financial wealth in exchange reserves is a byproduct of their industrial and trade policies, in effect an extra perk. So China is in no way "stuck with" the consequences of their great wealth, or constricted by its potential devaluation, as the goal of their policy has not been financial accrual but industral development. While we coveted cheaper golden eggs, China pursues and obtains the geese that lay them.

    16. Re: No worries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHEN China becomes dysfunctional? Seems to me, that they have BEEN dysfunctional since the 1800's. Any and all changes are simply flavors of dysfunctional over the last 200+ years.

      Not that the rest of the world has been any better, of course.

    17. Re:No worries by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      It leads to inflation because to maintain the undervaluation, China's central bank has to intervene in the currency markets and buy dollars to prevent the Yuan from appreciating, which increases the domestic money supply. By having to buy dollars (ie: US treasuries) China is essentially stuck buying huge amounts of US debt as long as it wants to maintain the export edge from having an undervalued currency (which is causing huge domestic pressures within China, there have been quite a few labor riots and urban-rural tension in the past few years).

      This bit here is complete nonsense. China owns a grand total of 7% of US foreign debt, and keeps its currency low by fiat, in other words it flatly refuses to allow it to be traded freely - it is not a participant in the free market. This is barely tolerated by international money markets because the advanges of cheap goods marginally outweigh the damage being caused to western labour markets, and even now rumblings are increasing to force it to unpeg its currency from the USD. They'll cling on like grim death to it as long as possible however. Union action is the natural result of the widening and clear gap between the ultra rich and the very poor in China.

    18. Re:No worries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Capitalisim It just works - War? it's not personal it's just business.

    19. Re: No worries by adwarf · · Score: 1

      They don't have any IOUs to call in, they own bonds paying a predictable interest rate at predictable time periods. The only thing they could do would sell their debt to others and flood the market with US bonds. This would make it so that we would either not be able to get more debt (because no one is buying) or we would have to pay extremely high interest rates to create more demand. This would not be good, but if we balanced the budget we would be alright, we would not have to try and pay it all back right away.

    20. Re: No worries by Kattspya · · Score: 1

      Poor people put less of a premium on a good environment than rich people do.

      There are countless examples in western countries of toxic waste dumping. Much of it about as informed as what's going on in China. It would appear that pollution is a stepping stone to wealth.

      American examples:
      Valley of the drums
      Love Canal
      Alkali lake chemical waste dump
      Iron Mountain Mine

  14. All this over a fishing boat by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This has just been the product of one of the stupidest cases of over-reactions of all time on all sides.

    Japan's holding a Chinese fishing captain who was fishing off of waters claimed by both Japan and China. Japan refuses to release the captain, so China asks for an informal ban on rare earth exports to Japan for the rest of the month. Both sides are being driven to some completely meaningless conflict by hardliners. China's hardliners see no reason to back down because they want to flex their muscles. Japan's hardliners see no reason to back down because they think they can benefit politically in future elections. And all of this because they can't agree how to settle a case about a fishing boat.

    --
    My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
    1. Re:All this over a fishing boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you know a thing about history it's not just about a fishing boat.

    2. Re:All this over a fishing boat by atfrase · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you think this is really just about a fishing boat, you haven't studied enough history or global politics.

    3. Re:All this over a fishing boat by TheEyes · · Score: 3, Informative

      To be fair, the fishing boat rammed the Japanese military boat (there is speculation that elements within China have been putting fishing boat captains up to this in the hope of provoking Japan), so the crime isn't really that the guy was fishing in disputed waters.

    4. Re:All this over a fishing boat by plover · · Score: 1

      It's just diplomatic-standard saber-rattling. Someone's just reminding the other side that "we are not to be ignored." In a few weeks sales will return and businesses will make profits again.

      China made their point, and they did it without "testing missiles". I'd say this might turn out to be better than ordinary saber rattling, as only one pawn is getting hurt, and nobody's talking about escalating it further.

      --
      John
    5. Re:All this over a fishing boat by plover · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the fishing boat rammed the Japanese military boat.

      Are you sure you aren't confusing them with the Sea Shepherds? :-)

      --
      John
    6. Re:All this over a fishing boat by jburroug · · Score: 4, Informative

      You forgot the part where the captain of the fishing boat rammed a pair of Japanese coast guard vessels during the altercation which is what led to his arrest. Note that the boat itself and the crew were released promptly. The Japanese currently have the boat captain held while they determine whether or not to formerly charge him in the ramming. IIRC Japanese law gives them ten days to hold him while charges are pending and if they charge him he will be put on trial and run through their justice system just like anyone charged with a crime pretty much anywhere.

      China wants Japan to ignore their laws and release the captain. Not so much I think because they care about the captain though. Japan is holding the captain for violating their domestic laws for an act committed in their territorial waters. China is throwing a hissy fit because they also claim the islands near where this occurred and if they concede to Japan's right to try the captain in their courts they are assenting to Japan's claims of sovereignty over the islands in question. Of course it would really be a lot easier to just file an official protest with Japan, the UN and I don't know maybe the ICC protesting blah blah blah Japan's actions and then just carrying on as usual. They can still maintain their claim over the islands and instead of looking childish and irresponsible to the international community they look like a responsible grown up nation.

      Personally I'm glad to see China playing their hand so early in the game with this and other recent outbursts as it really gives lie to their whole Peaceful Rise message they try to sell to the rest of the world. Their neighbors and west are finally getting the message that China needs to be taken seriously as a rising power and a rising threat to our interests and not just a cheap place to order walmart crap from.

      Cheers,

      Josh

      --
      "Listen: We are here on Earth to fart around. Don't let anybody tell you any different!" - Kurt Vonnegut
    7. Re:All this over a fishing boat by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Its a little more complicated than that. Do a little goolging. China is trying to economically ruin Japan. Japan also fucked with China alot in the past. Its just another iteration of the same old bullshit.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    8. Re:All this over a fishing boat by Audacious · · Score: 1

      This has a lot to do with loosing face. Whoever backs down first looses not only face but the integrity to demand certain things as well. Like the island Japan is claiming. If they back down on the fishing captain they will probably lose the island because China's next move is to demand that Japan recognize China's right to the island. Most likely China would use the same tactics it is employing now.

      Here are some other things to think about in this conflict:

      1. While it is true Japan does not have a large land mass with extensive resources, Japan is a master at trading with other countries. Japan also has extensive investments in other countries (such as the US) and they own and operate companies in those other countries. Thus, by doing what China has done, it could backfire on China because other countries (such as the US) will be prodded by the Japanese to intervene.

      2. Japan has a very large extension to their land into the ocean on the eastern side of the island. As far as I know, Japan has never tried to harvest minerals from the ocean. This is because it is harder to do this than to buy the minerals from a country that can mine it readily. However, if the Japanese are driven to it - I believe they will begin making investments in mining minerals directly from the ocean's floor.

      3. Africa holds many exotic minerals in its land and within the past few years, Japan has been buying in to the mineral rights in Africa (as has China). So I believe that although China's blockade will hurt Japan, I do not think it will hurt it as much as many think it will.

      As for the "Nukem til they glow!" mentality - A chinese friend of mine told me, back in the 1970s, that one of the major the Chinese prophecies states that the US (the eagle from the west) attacks China and there is a tremendous war that ensues which decimates the US. Whether or not this is true (as the Bible also states that the great nations are all at war [bear, eagle, and many headed dragon]) remains to be seen.

      The truth, as far as I can see it, is that China and Japan need to sit down, at a table, across from each other, and talk things out. China itself is a massive country and a few small islands really are not worth their time or effort. The life of the fishing captain is. Japan should also have released the fishing captain and his boat. Possibly after taking all of the fish (since they would spoil anyway) and giving the captain a percentage of the money gained through their sale. China is still lving with World War II in mind where the Japanese killed millions of Chinese. The Chinese need to remember that they have killed millions of Japanese in the past also. Like the countries in the Middle East, where hatreds go all the way back to when the Egyptians were building their pyramids, the world needs to grow up, become adults, and stop acting like bratty children. But then - you'd also have to stop some of those brats from continuing to push the other children's buttons. Like the Iraelis continuing to build on land that was never given to them in the original treaty. Of course, then you'd have to also recognize that Israel was founded without the consent of the people who were living in the Middle East at the time it was created. The land was just taken away from them and given to the Israelis. But enough of that. The mantra should be "Grow-up, play-nice, and stop acting like you are SO offended." We only have one sandbox to play in - let's try to get along.

      --
      Someone put a black hole in my pocket and now I'm broke. :-)
    9. Re:All this over a fishing boat by khallow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      China itself is a massive country and a few small islands really are not worth their time or effort. The life of the fishing captain is.

      The two hundred mile exclusive economic zone is worth more than the life of a fishing captain to the Chinese government. The precedent of getting Japan and its allies to back down on a territorial claim may be even more valuable than that.

    10. Re:All this over a fishing boat by DavMz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Japan's holding a Chinese fishing captain who was fishing off of waters claimed by both Japan and China.

      Let me fix that for you: Japan's holding a Chinese fishing captain whose boat has rammed a Japanese military ship in Japanese waters.

      If you want a bit of history about the Daioyu / senkaku islands, here is an an article in the French newspaper "Le Monde" (through google translate

    11. Re:All this over a fishing boat by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes. China has recently claimed a large part of the South China Sea right up to the Exclusive Economic Zones of many of its neighbours (Taiwan, Japan, Vietnam, Philipines). Such claims are contra to the established territories and make those countries very nervous. The fishing boat was considered to be in Japanese territory (at least according to international rulings on the area). The Chinese may feel they have had a bad deal hstorically when the rulings were made, but unilaterally claiming territory currently internationally belonging to others doesn't make you many friends (eg. witness Russia annexing Abkhazia, which made sense to them but was massively counter-productive in the global scheme of things).

    12. Re:All this over a fishing boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well at least they haven't invaded some hapless country claiming they have OMG WMDs. They have a long way to go!

      Also, USA! USA! USA!

    13. Re:All this over a fishing boat by hackingbear · · Score: 1, Interesting

      And you don't realize all you have said may have been based off claims of Western media who are playing populist cards at home because of all the envies toward China in the western society. No, China does not want "Japan to ignore their laws." They claim Japan have no legal rights to do so at all because the island, which is also claimed by Taiwan which you may consider the enemy of China, does not belong to Japan. Think what would happen if Chinese claims Guam belong to them, sent a vessels to guam, captured an American boat and charged the captain for entering the water illegally.

      And if you can read some Chinese, you can find out that the Chinese "hard-liners" are the ones stopping the Chinese people from protesting and that some of those protesting are Hong Kong pro-Democracy activists who have been against the Chinese government most other times. And you can guess why the activists are doing that.

      And for this particular RE claim, nobody here seems to notice that it has been immediately denied by the Chinese government.

      Learn more about history, media,and politics, and don't just rely on your mainstream media reports.

    14. Re:All this over a fishing boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... Makes me wonder if the Sea Shepard team should seriously start a recruiting campaign in China. New Zealand and Australia are nice and all, but seem to lack the balls to back up and enforce the no whaling policy setup many years ago. Now a country with a somewhat active navy and resources to hold ransom, that might give a bit of a boost. Imagine the results if a few Chinese citizens were deployed in the Antarctic and pulled some non-violent passive aggressive boarding tactics ala Peter Bethune.

      Interestingly enough, a quick google found this.

      It's not that I don't like Japan. They do some great and wonderful things with technology, entertainment, and general cultural weirdness. But in regards to some other things (like overfishing, whaling, and dumping trash out at sea), they really should consider the bigger picture and whether or not their actions are really worth it.

    15. Re:All this over a fishing boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not as straight forward as it looks.

      The timing tells a lot, and many fishermen from China have been fishing in that region for a very long time. For them to be kidnapped at this time is a reflection of political play in Japan. My bets are either with the high-powered civil servants or the LDP trying to capture the initiatives and obstruct the new government in their initiatives.

      Imperialism was not extinguished in Japan, unlike in German. On the contrary, they were very much in power but was forced not to show it out in the public. If you visit the deeper part of many shrines in Japan, you shall see their dead soldiers were being worshiped for trying to bring economic goods back to the motherland. It is still an honor for the family that had sons that were killed this way. That parts of shrine still bring in many donors and worshipers year after year. Many in the West were either ignorant of the trouble seeds were intentionally planted like those in the middle east. This is to keep other regions in check (in trouble) - if you are busy with all these fighting, you can't be growing effectively and competing.

    16. Re:All this over a fishing boat by MechaStreisand · · Score: 1

      So if it's been denied by the Chinese government, it can't be true?

      Anyone who would believe that is not worth trying to convince.

      --
      Disclaimer: IANAL. This post is, however, legal advice, and creates an attorney-client relationship.
    17. Re:All this over a fishing boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go suck a Cheney

    18. Re:All this over a fishing boat by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      They chased the guy down after he refused to respond to radio hailing and started to run. Had he simply responded they would have just told him to stay out of the area and let him go, but instead he ran so they decided to see what was up. While trying to chorale him he made a handling error and bumped in to them. Note the damage on the coast guard ship - it's at the back. But besides it's hardly about who hit who right now.

    19. Re:All this over a fishing boat by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      I'll bet 500CNY you're Chinese.

    20. Re:All this over a fishing boat by tangelogee · · Score: 1

      The precedent of getting Japan and its allies to back down on a territorial claim may be even more valuable than that.

      Isn't this how WWII started?

    21. Re:All this over a fishing boat by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it is true or not. I said "nobody here noticed."

      Though I would bet it is not true, just because things like that can be easily verified and official announcements don't make obvious lies. If you want to play this game, you would use something unprovable.

    22. Re:All this over a fishing boat by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      I'll bet 74.62USD you're not Chinese.

    23. Re:All this over a fishing boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Falklands/Malvinas War started over a Scrap Metal Boat owned by British and Argentinian entrepeneurs...

    24. Re:All this over a fishing boat by Audacious · · Score: 1

      That may be - but you noticed that Japan did release the captain and his ship. I think you will shortly see China reduce or remove the export restrictions.

      --
      Someone put a black hole in my pocket and now I'm broke. :-)
    25. Re:All this over a fishing boat by Audacious · · Score: 1

      For the Japanese? It is one factor. But WWII started with Germany invading Poland. Japan had re-invented itself from a feudal country without any real punch to its power into a force to be reckoned with. Unlike China, which got a later start in converting from swords, bows & arrows, and other such items - Japan embraced western technology once they saw just how effective it really was. China was playing catch-up to Japan when Hitler began WWII. Japan saw this as a way to justify their extermination of the people of China, and began an all-out war against China. Germany, for its part, pleaded with Japan not to attack America (the so-called Sleeping Giant) but Japan wanted the Hawaiian islands because they felt the islands belonged to them. Thus Pearl Harbor. The irony of it all is that Russia and China were actually thinking about joining Hitler in his bid to take over the world. However, Hitler (or the Nazis) knew that there were huge Jewish sects in Russia and the Chinese - Japan hatred made Hitler have to choose between the two. He chose Japan but regretted it later when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor because it brought America into the war. Since America had been fed a diet of rapist, murders, druggies, and insane people for years by the Europeans (and everyone else in the world) - we were feared not only because of how powerful we were as a nation, but because they had no idea exactly what we were like except that we were brutal or barbaric in battle. We were (and still are) the crazy nation of the world. Further, since the "Wild West" was still pretty young, America enlisted the aid of American Indians. My father was grouped with some commanches in WWII and they were under direct orders to teach the rest of the guys commanche war cries. The blood curdling cries would, on their own, cause the Germans to run away (or become demoralized) because according to the movies - the Indians scalped everyone and the Germans were very much afraid that they would be scalped. Further, once things got to going it was the American Indians who would talk over the walkie-talkies because they were talking in their own language and no one except the other American Indians knew what they were saying. This is because it wasn't like code breaking. The entire language would have to be learned in order to know what was being said.

      --
      Someone put a black hole in my pocket and now I'm broke. :-)
  15. Re:Not quite that clear cut, but important nonethe by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ya we need to look in to this. Despite the name, Rare Earths aren't. There are plenty of them. Of course they have to be mined, refined, and all that shit. That is largely left to China simply because China pays people shit and has no safety or environmental standards. However as you accurately note, they are important, we need to be supplying ourselves.

  16. Re:Not quite that clear cut, but important nonethe by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1) Get investors
    2) Buy the land in the US with REMs below
    3) Start mining

    Depending on who you know, step 2.5 should be asking the US gov for tariffs on rare earth metals coming from China, to help prop up the price in the US (otherwise, China will manipulate the export price to make it economically infeasible to mine in the US, and then raise prices once mining has stopped).

  17. The Chinese are notorious for these tactics by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Helps when your government has total control over your ostensibly "capitalist" system. They recently levied some random bullshit charges against Toyota as well, a not so thinly veiled swipe at the Japanese government. Then there is Rio Tinot case where China made sure Rio Tinto didn't compete against a Chinese company by jailing their executives on a bullshit charge. They are also the same market that abhors protectionism and then is protectionist every chance they get. Even during the heyday of Japanese protectionism there were no where NEAR as bad as the Chinese. But of course, protectionism is bad, unless it benefits the Chinese, then its good.

    Japan the US and the EU really should team up to take China to task for all the bullshit its pulling.

    1. Re:The Chinese are notorious for these tactics by microbee · · Score: 1

      They recently levied some random bullshit charges against Toyota as well

      The first government that comes to mind isn't China.

      Don't even mention who is the No.1 in waving embargo at countries it doesn't like.

      US and Japan already teamed up. So I don't get what you think they can do.

    2. Re:The Chinese are notorious for these tactics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japan and the EU and the US will not team and take CHina to task over this. These tactics are annoying but not nearly worth the value of cheap Chinese labor (yet).

    3. Re:The Chinese are notorious for these tactics by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the Chinese keep their currency pegged and manipulate the world markets in other non-capitalist ways. It boils down to China doing anything in its power to benefit itself, and it just thumbs its nose at everyone else saying "you think we can do whatever we want? look at this shiny nuclear weapon". There is no doubt in my mind that there wont be a war some day between China and someone else.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    4. Re:The Chinese are notorious for these tactics by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      cant^ do whatever we want

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    5. Re:The Chinese are notorious for these tactics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly what I was thinking....

      Tell me again... how is the US embargo on Cuba any different? Oh I remember... is practically a COMPLETE EMBARGO and has been running for over 40 years.

    6. Re:The Chinese are notorious for these tactics by fnj · · Score: 1

      The Chinese government and industry are in bed together. Exactly which has "control" over the other is as pointless a question as it is in a marriage. It is a union intended to dominate the people and it is as corrupt as hell.

      Anyway, big duh. The government and industry are in bed together, and it is a domineering and corrupt union. Sounds just like ... let's see ... the U.S. ... EU ... Russia ... Japan ... ad nauseum. The entire world is run this way.

  18. Ah huh... by arcite · · Score: 0

    But the Japanese have one thing. ROBOTS!

    1. Re:Ah huh... by Jeng · · Score: 1

      I imagine the robots are heavily dependent on those rare earth metals.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  19. Not really over a fisherman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The fisherman story is a big piece of this story, but not all or even half of it. The real issue at stake has to do with some little tiny rock in the East China Sea. It was recognized as an island and part of Japan's soveriegn land by treaties with the US in WW2, but historically has been used by both China and Japan. The fact is, it doesn't really qualify as an island by the international legal definition; it's just a dead volcano with no active life or anything. Just a big rock.

    However, if the Japanese can claim it as their territorial grounds, then what comes along with that is the 200 mile exclusive economic zone, and apparently that area has some of the best commercial fishing in East Asia as well as being suspected of having substantial undiscovered mineral and gas deposits. So while the talk about a fisherman is noteworthy, he's just a pawn, like this rare earth metals embargo is also a pawn, in this game over access to exploit those resources.

    1. Re:Not really over a fisherman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like Dokdo (Japanese call it Takeshima, and in English it's Liancourt Rocks), the same issue the Japanese and Koreans have been fighting over; control of a tiny, barren speck of rock poking out of the ocean.

    2. Re:Not really over a fisherman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a big deal. Most people who don't understand maritime law think "Why all the fuss over some speck of rock?" What comes along with that speck of rock is underwater oil and mineral deposits in huge quantities, often to the edge of the continental shelf. When you can expand your EEZ and crowd out your neighbors, it gives you a huge economic advantage. That's really what this is about, as is the Dokdo island dispute you mentioned.

      I missed it in my earlier post; the islands in dispute are the Senkaku Islands (Japanese, Chinese name is Diaoyu Islands).

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senkaku_Islands

    3. Re:Not really over a fisherman by GlobalEcho · · Score: 1

      some of the best commercial fishing in East Asia .... So while the talk about a fisherman is noteworthy, he's just a pawn

      A pawn for prawn, as it were.

    4. Re:Not really over a fisherman by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      IMO, the 200 mile exclusive zone is stupid when applied to tiny islets. They should have originally defined the exclusive zone as something like the *lesser* of 200 miles or 10 times the distance from the center of any landmass to the shore. That would make arbitrary little rocks that stick up out of the ocean much less likely to generate conflict.

    5. Re:Not really over a fisherman by DavMz · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was recognized as an island and part of Japan's soveriegn land by treaties with the US in WW2, but historically has been used by both China and Japan.

      Please check your facts

      The island has never been used. It is claimed by the PRC only since 1971, though it is true that it was known to them for a looooong time.

    6. Re:Not really over a fisherman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While the reason PRC's claim is over the island, her claim over the island is completely insincere (The government must allow people free to express or not express the claim, when it make a claim). The government (even Hong Kong government) do not allow any ship (even fishery ship) to go to the water nearby the island.

      It is simply a matter that PRC wanted to show her muscle.

      Any people who can read Chinese can verify this link:
      http://www.sinchew.com.my/node/176611?tid=2
      http://hk.news.yahoo.com/article/100922/3/kcyi.html

    7. Re:Not really over a fisherman by varmittang · · Score: 1

      And China only claimed it after oil was found.

      --
      -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
      12345
      -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
  20. Summary and Article Misleading... by coolmoose25 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... But not intentionally so... if you RTFA, and I did, you'll find that rare earths actually aren't really rare. So while China MINES 93 percent of the world's rare earths, and thus supplies 99% of it, most countries COULD also do this if they wanted to. In fact, the last mine in the US closed in 2002 because, according to the article, of a radiation leak... seems these rare earth's are usually found with radioactive thorium and uranium. So what has happened is that China positioned itself as a reliable supplier of rare earths, and did so cheaply. Although the article doesn't say this, my guess is that China probably doesn't take the same safety precautions with mines and the thorium, which the article did say was costly to dispose of.

    What has happened here is that China, again, produces things in an environmentally unfriendly way (since they apparently don't care much about the cost of crapping on their own country), and thus does so with cheap labor, thus becoming the most economically viable producer. Only now do they start to flex that muscle they have built...

    So the world has a few choices - they can continue to rely on China, and deal with politically induced supply disruptions, find other countries that are willing to cheaply crap on their own environments and buy from them, or produce such materials locally but at much higher cost.

    --
    Brawndo: It's what plants crave!
    1. Re:Summary and Article Misleading... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      And when the flex, we will use out resources. With any luck, it's only after they have depleted most of theirs.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Summary and Article Misleading... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      This is exactly why anytime I hear people talk about "peak oil", I know that they have no clue. The amount of a resource that is pulled out of the ground tells you almost nothing about how much is in the ground. The only thing that it tells you is that there USED to be AT LEAST that much in the ground.

    3. Re:Summary and Article Misleading... by AJWM · · Score: 1

      seems these rare earth's are usually found with radioactive thorium and uranium.

      Yes, the actinides (which include thorium and uranium, and a bunch of not naturally occuring transuranics) are chemically in the same Group as the rare earth elements, so would tend to be concentrated by the same geochemical processes.

      China probably doesn't take the same safety precautions with mines and the thorium, which the article did say was costly to dispose of.

      Or they put the thorium to some other use. There used to be more of a market for thorium; it was used in the mantles of gas lamps, even (in camping lanterns) up until a decade or so ago. The "atomic boy scout" extracted the thorium from thousands of such for his experiments. Government regs these days put a lot more limits on the availability of the stuff, so American mines that may once have been profitable selling both REEs and thorium are no longer if they can't sell the thorium.

      Now, if we had a good breeder reactor program....

      --
      -- Alastair
    4. Re:Summary and Article Misleading... by AfroTrance · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What has happened here is that China, again, produces things in an environmentally unfriendly way (since they apparently don't care much about the cost of crapping on their own country), and thus does so with cheap labor, thus becoming the most economically viable producer.

      China doesn't care about being "economically viable" with things like this. I'm sure that when they flooded the market with REE, therefore reducing the price, therefore causing other mines to become uneconomic, that they were operating at a loss.

      After all, most of the businesses within China are state owned. State owned enterprise does not need to return a profit to the share holders.

    5. Re:Summary and Article Misleading... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      It's worth noting that the equipment used in mining relies on oil to run them. Unless you can build portable on-site nuclear reactors, the cost of ANYTHING mined will scale laterally with the price of oil.

      Oil is the bottom of our economic food chain. Without cheap oil, civilization as we know it (both in material possession and culture) will cease to exist as we know it. Western nations are built and optimized to run off this great hydrocarbon. But the party is about to be over, and we better get used to a -forced- exit policy. Some say technology will replace oil. Other say we will have to change our way of living entirely. The truth is somewhere in between.

      If China was smart, they would be building nuclear reactors like crazy. They're just now building a 1st world infrastructure. They might as well do this while there's still cheap oil left to build the reactors. America and Europe are already built up. We have a much longer way to go with regards to retrofitting our infrastructure as opposed to building one from the ground up like they are now.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    6. Re:Summary and Article Misleading... by us7892 · · Score: 1

      find other countries that are willing to cheaply crap on their own environments
      I need a job. I'll start mining the backwoods of West Virginia again.

  21. I can see the viagra now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dirt, spice, poppies, slaves. We'll pretty much go to war over anything.

    No one's fought a war over sex yet.

    1. Re:I can see the viagra now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've obviously never had a girlfriend. Relationships are just a war over sex and dinner.

    2. Re:I can see the viagra now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    3. Re:I can see the viagra now by fyngyrz · · Score: 3, Funny

      No one's fought a war over sex yet.

      Speak for yourself.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    4. Re:I can see the viagra now by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      You mean recently?

      You ever heard of Troy?

    5. Re:I can see the viagra now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Indeed, a thousand ships were launched when King Menelaus discovered that he had run out of condoms.

      The greatest warrior on either side was Achilles, who was completely invulnerable everywhere except his heel. According to Homer, he slew Hector in a single blow with his unsheathed manhood.

      We can thank the Trojan War for incredible advances in chemistry. Many important new developments were made in latex technology, due to the Greeks' need to properly protect the Trojan Horse.

      Helen of Troy, ironically, and anachronistically, had syphilis.

    6. Re:I can see the viagra now by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's not true... I'm constantly at war with myself.

      --
      "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
    7. Re:I can see the viagra now by kanto · · Score: 1

      The trojan war was a double entendre; sure it started of as an expedition to retrieve Helen, but inexplicably a horse was involved in a way which can only be described as a Freudian slip.

    8. Re:I can see the viagra now by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      Not yet. China has a shortage of females due to the one child policy though ....

    9. Re:I can see the viagra now by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      This may have been a better link.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    10. Re:I can see the viagra now by JustABlitheringIdiot · · Score: 1

      That's not true... I'm constantly at war with myself.

      Fighting with yourself and beating yourself up about something is definitely not the same as beating yourself off about something. Be careful to separate the actions.

  22. Subsidize mining industry? by jmichaelg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is so damn typical. Congress passes a law that has negative consequences so they pass another law to try to fix the consequences. Congress is responsible for the decline of rare earth mines in the first place. For example, a good junk of the Mojave was home to several rare-earth mines that were put out of business when Senator Feinstein pushed through the Desert Wilderness Protection act.

      Solar farms are out of luck when they try to site in the Mojave for the same reason - Feinstein has blocked off huge chunks of land.

    Instead of subsidizing mining, perhaps repealing Senator Feinstein's handiwork would be a good place to start.

    1. Re:Subsidize mining industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Laws and regulations are added. Almost never removed.

      Good luck with that repealing...

    2. Re:Subsidize mining industry? by ISoldat53 · · Score: 1

      Damn. Shoulda bought some precious metal futures.

    3. Re:Subsidize mining industry? by AfroTrance · · Score: 1

      Precious metals are not a rare earth elements/metals/minerals.

  23. Future production by AfroTrance · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Mt Weld mine in Australia is under construction. They claim to be able to supply 20% of global production. The Mountain Pass mine is to re-open next year as well.

    1. Re:Future production by compro01 · · Score: 1

      There's also a rare earth mine at Lake Thor in NWT, Canada getting set up.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  24. Go Fe16N2! by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'll sure be happy when the figure out how to grow mass quantities of Fe16N2 crystals to make even stronger magnets so we can forget about rare-earth.

    --
    That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
    1. Re:Go Fe16N2! by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

      Flat panel displays, thin film solar voltaics, hydrogen storage materials and many others also depend rare earth metals.

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    2. Re:Go Fe16N2! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe some day some alloy made from rare-earth will be stronger than Fe16N2, who knows.....
      If something is rare, it has its value....

  25. US sources coming back on line by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This was covered in the Economist last week.

    The US has some of the largest deposits of rare earths in the world. One big location is Mountain Pass, California. The mine there was closed in 2002, because it wasn't competitive with the China price. (Or with China's mining with a complete lack of environmental controls.)

    The Mountain Pass mine is being reopened under new management. In a few years, this problem will be over.

    The problem with rare-earth mining is that, since the materials are rare, the waste problem is huge. The early stages of extractoin are messy. Big acid lakes, things like that.

    1. Re:US sources coming back on line by klui · · Score: 1

      Will this new management extract with a complete lack of environmental controls?

    2. Re:US sources coming back on line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with rare-earth mining is that, since the materials are rare, ...

      Except that they are not

      The term "rare earth" arises from the rare earth minerals from which they were first isolated, which were uncommon oxide-type minerals (earths) found in Gadolinite extracted from one mine in the village of Ytterby, Sweden. However, with the exception of the highly-unstable promethium, rare earth elements are found in relatively high concentrations in the earth's crust, with cerium being the 25th most abundant element in the Earth's crust at 68 parts per million.

      (from wikipedia)

    3. Re:US sources coming back on line by turkeyfish · · Score: 1

      The slag shouldn't be a problem. CA doesn't want it but red states couldn't care less about their environment, so it can be shipped to Utah, Idaho and Arizona.

    4. Re:US sources coming back on line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I learned a couple weeks ago that Mountain Pass doesn't contain all of the important rare earth metals. Even with MP providing the US with most of their RE needs, there will still be a critical need for imports.

  26. Mining is inherently boom or bust by mschaffer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, they're looking to subsidize the revival of the American rare earths industry?
    It's not like it will evaporate out of the ground if we aren't mining it. There's no need to destroy the environment with unnecessary mining and waste money for digging's sake.
    If the price goes up, we'll just start digging again. Just like every other mining cycle.

    1. Re:Mining is inherently boom or bust by tehdaemon · · Score: 1
      --
      Laws are horrible moral guides, moral guides make even worse laws.
  27. Oh Captain My Captain by Kagato · · Score: 1

    It's nice to see the Chinese are advancing. In the past they would just trump up some charges on a random Japanese Businessman that had the ire of the local party chair. Now it's a two part grab. 1) Make your point on the captain. 2) Force highly skilled manufacturing to China so you can steal the intellectual property!

  28. Typical bad policy by SecurityGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the rare earth supply dries up, the open market price will rise and mining these domestically will happen because it's economically sensible to do so. There's no reason to subsidize anything, Congress. Just get out of the way and let the market work.

    1. Re:Typical bad policy by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

      That depends on how fast supply dries up compared to how fast those mines can get producing. The economic cost of a temporary shortage might prove greater than the cost of that subsidy. That said, Congress shouldn't be tossing subsidies around without good reason to expect that scenario.

    2. Re:Typical bad policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, mod parent up! If China decides to embargo us, we'll just start mining the stuff ourselves, and our minerals will be in our military components within the next five to ten years.

      God knows we have enough nuclear weapons to hold off an invasion for that long.

    3. Re:Typical bad policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very True.
      The Down side? Rationing of products using them. Huge Price increases. And non availability.

      And a degraded Defence capability. That means the government needs to stockpile for the military at least.

        The free market can fix a lot of supply issues. But it does not promise it will be pain free.

    4. Re:Typical bad policy by Seth+Kriticos · · Score: 1

      I'm generally against subsidies too, and hope there is another solution.

      The problem that needs to be solved, is that most of the processing chain is done in China too (they don't really allow to export the raw ore), so you are looking at a process of kick-starting an entire industry supply chain from ore to alloy. That takes decades.

      Normally free market would still work if the supply would reduce slowly, but if China one day says: "Ok, that's it guys, no more rare earths, get of our lawn..", we'd be in very deep shit.

    5. Re:Typical bad policy by shentino · · Score: 1

      Too bad politicians are considered a good in this so called "free market"

  29. Easy fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get Molycorps U.S. mines operating again.

    1. Re:Easy fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      352813N 1153242W
      Mountain Pass, California
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_Pass,_California

  30. Here's the formerly obligatory... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    "All your rare earths are belong to us."

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  31. review the American military dependence by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Its about time.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  32. Can they do it? by blind+biker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I thought this kind of embargo would cause all sorts of sanctions from WTO members, and that China wasn't supposed to do this as a signatory of various WTO trade agreements.

    I'm getting a bit annoyed at China's constant attempts at having their pie and eating it. But I guess they can get away with this - after all, way too many countries have their balls squeezed by China.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:Can they do it? by microbee · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, most of Chinese think the government has not enough balls when it comes to diplomacy.

      I imagine what would happen if some country came to US-claimed territory, grabbed one of its citizens and sent him to court.

    2. Re:Can they do it? by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Earlier in the decade economic retaliation against China would have been pointless, but at this point their is already social upheaval with even slight drops in the economic growth rates. If the US was willing to shoot the US economy dead and impose sanctions against China there is a fairly good chance the communist party would get strung up by the populace. Sure the people might look the other way when they rolled tanks over freedom protesters but they won't look the other way when they don't get paid. China's populace and economy has moved beyond a critical point where the people care very much about employment and a collapse in the export economy driven by their undervaluing the yuan against the dollar would cause some very serious social upheaval. Were it to happen I wouldn't be surprised if we saw French revolution levels of violence against the party.

      The US, Europe and Japan all need to work together and show China a hard line on the Yuan, were we all to cooperate in a currency manipulation complaint we could force the Chinese to make changes with the threat of their own necks on the line if they don't comply. The key to such a complaint working is for the EU, the US and Japan to all work together on the complaint. Sadly I don't think it will happen.

    3. Re:Can they do it? by AfroTrance · · Score: 1

      It probably will. They will probably keep the embargo going until the WTO threatens to issue a sanction. China is flexing their muscle. They are saying to Japan that they have power over them. Their goal isn't to permanently block supply to Japan.

      FYI, the US has does the exact same thing. IE creating a tariff that is against WTO rules, then only removing the tariff 1-2 years later when the WTO finally reacts. You can get away with it if you are a powerful economy.

    4. Re:Can they do it? by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm afraid the analogy you gave is wrong. The territory is "claimed by China" but "internationally recognized as belong to Japan". This is not the same situation you attempted to outline (seizing citizens on their sovereign territory is not the same as seizing someone else's citizens that are on your sovereign territory). That is why the Japanese had the legal power to do what they did. "Claiming" something is meaningless and doesn't make it yours until all the countries in the world agree with you.

    5. Re:Can they do it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm getting a bit annoyed at China's constant attempts at having their pie and eating it

      You should go over and beat them up then. Once you've gather enough of China's magnets to make enough weapons to kill 1.2 billion people ... declare war and you can blast the largest nation on earth back to the stone age. Of course ... then there wouldn't be any more rare earth materials, but hey.. if you want to make an omelet.

      I'm getting a bit annoyed at armchair politicians voting for self-endowing morons who spend most of their time dreaming up ways to keep their voter base fat, lazy and apathetic.

    6. Re:Can they do it? by sadboyzz · · Score: 1

      "Claiming" something is meaningless and doesn't make it yours until all the countries in the world agree with you.

      Well, apparently as this case shows it also means that there will be "strong reactions" from the Chinese government if you seize one of its citizen in the "claimed" territory, though I must say it's not even half as "strong" as what a great majority of Chinese people were calling for.

      On the other hand, I don't think there really exists anything that "all the countries in the world" agree on...

  33. Cold War Titanium by SirDrinksAlot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The bulk of the USA's titanium during the cold war came from Russia. They bought it through fake companies and then used it on the very spy planes that they used to spy on them. I always rather enjoyed that little bit of information.

  34. This just in... by Script+Cat · · Score: 1

    Japan blocks the import of cheep manga figurines from China crippling China's economy.

    1. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and laying waste to Japan's otakus. In other news, school-girl rape is on the rise.

  35. Take that by nerdin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The world should simply accepte that there's a new Master and no longer is called USA.

    1. Re:Take that by thestudio_bob · · Score: 1

      The world should simply accepte that there's a new Master and no longer is called USA.

      Accepte? Our new Master are the French?

      --
      The real Sig captains the Northwestern. This one captains /.
    2. Re:Take that by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Dude. LOL.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    3. Re:Take that by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      We'll see about that. I would just like to remind that both economically and militarily, the combined strength of Western countries (which will set up a united front if clearly threatened by China) dwarf anyone else.

      Personally, I like it that way. For all the flaws US may have, as a society, it's far, far better than China.

  36. Next Media Animation (NMA)'s video. by antdude · · Score: 1

    Watch it on YouTube. It has a ninja and panda! :D

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  37. "rare earths"? by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

    "rare earths"?

    I'll say. There's only one in existence.

  38. It's PANDAmonium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pretty well explained here

  39. USA cancels imports of cheap Chinese toys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's next? USA cancels imports of cheap Chinese toys, tools, and other things.

    1. Re:USA cancels imports of cheap Chinese toys! by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      But think of the children!

  40. Re:Not quite that clear cut, but important nonethe by Nerdfest · · Score: 2, Funny

    3 is supposed to be "profit!!" and you have no question marks. Are you a business major or something?

  41. This is a lesson for China's trading partners... by dtjohnson · · Score: 1

    Politics is much more important to the Chinese than your business. That is the takeaway here. The Chinese governemnt is willing to plunge most of the industrial west into chaos over fishing rights to a patch of ocean around uninhabitated islands that the Japanese have controlled since at least 1895. The rare earth issue is a blessing in disguise. Until 1984, the United States was by far the biggest producer of rare earths from it Mountain Pass Mine in California. After the mine was closed, the field was left to China and this is the result...they have become a political tool to compel obedience to Beijing. The Mountain Pass mine will be reopened in 2011 and US production will eventually restore balance to the world economic production...but the memory of what the Chinese will do as your trading partner should never be forgotten.

  42. Just a silly game. by jpapon · · Score: 1

    Industry officials said that mainland China’s customs agency had notified companies that they were not allowed to ship to Japan any rare earth oxides, rare earth salts or pure rare earth metals, although these shipments are still allowed to go to Hong Kong, Singapore and other destinations.

    So all your ship has to do is make a stop in Hong Kong, and then it can go to Japan. Oh noes!

    --
    -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
  43. Re:Not quite that clear cut, but important nonethe by compro01 · · Score: 1

    There are rare earth mines in the US, they're just inactive due to China being able to do it cheaper.

    But this recent trade conflict has people getting local mines going again. Two rare earth mines in California are reopening and there's a new one in progress up in the northwest territories here in Canada.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  44. Re:Not quite that clear cut, but important nonethe by Nethead · · Score: 1

    Good article Alexis. Thanks for helping to bring this to the fore-front.

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  45. No problem... by jasno · · Score: 1

    I see no problem with the Chinese supplying all of our rare-earth needs. If they're willing to sacrifice their environment for short-term gains then so be it. We're in the process of collecting their rare-earth elements in our landfills, which one day will serve as a valuable strategic resource.

    Similarly, I think the US should hold off on oil extraction until the other nations have started to exhaust their supplies. Once the prices start to rise, only then should we tap our reserves.

    --

    http://www.masturbateforpeace.com/
    1. Re:No problem... by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      Similarly, I think the US should hold off on oil extraction until the other nations have started to exhaust their supplies. Once the prices start to rise, only then should we tap our reserves.

      Unfortunately "once the prices start to rise" will be the very second your retarded plan is put into action, you fucking Yankee cretin.

  46. Prediction by TopSpin · · Score: 1

    Within a week the Obama administration will take some dramatic and highly public step against Chinese imports to the US. The pretense will be that Japan is an important ally. The actual reason will be Democrats desperate need to find an issue, any issue, that will rally the working class voter to the election five weeks from now. The left has been looking for a justification to attack Chinese imports but has not been willing to initiate a trade war. China just handed them a campaign platform.

    No, the fact that China buys lots of treasuries won't prevent this; the Fed is buying treasuries with printed money now. No, the fact that China will probably react by embargoing US trade won't stop it either; the left doesn't care about the US farmer or his agriculture exports to China. No, the vanishingly small amount of exports that isn't agriculture won't stop them either.

    The left is starting to realize that letting working class prosperity evacuate to China makes for an unreliable constituency. The right is about to discover that China is rapidly transitioning from cheap-labor-r-us to international belligerent.

    --
    Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
    1. Re:Prediction by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 1

      Never underestimate the Democrat's ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

  47. BUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that is ore. Now you have to separate it. Right now, only CHina has that capability. The west needs a minimum of two different nations to do the separation. US rep Coffman is pushing for the 1 billion to get the US started on this (though like everything else, the party of no as well as the party of no clue are fighting that ). Another western nation needs to start this. My thinking is that Australia or EU needs to do this.
    Windbourne.

  48. misleading headline? by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

    "China Embargos Rare Earth Exports To Japan"

    In response, Japan is restricting their exports of Spirit, Cactus, and the Small Faces to China. "We will not be bullied by such blatant violations of international law" said Hiro Tashakawa the Japanese minister of under appreciated supergroups and late 60's rock bands. Representives from Blind Faith, Derek and the Dominos, and Mountain were unavailable for comment.

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  49. Re:Not quite that clear cut, but important nonethe by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

    Ya we need to look in to this. Despite the name, Rare Earths aren't. There are plenty of them. Of course they have to be mined, refined, and all that shit. That is largely left to China simply because China pays people shit and has no safety or environmental standards. However as you accurately note, they are important, we need to be supplying ourselves.

    And China's escalation here, if it's real, may directly lead to the end of their monopoly on world supply. That would be a huge economic and strategic loss.

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  50. Re:Not quite that clear cut, but important nonethe by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    nah, as long as we keep up the tech with effectively engineering sample levels of production so we can expand if needed, it's better to let china despoil themselves and keep our land and water clean

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  51. Re:Not quite that clear cut, but important nonethe by zeropointburn · · Score: 1

    Mods: the truth by definition is not a troll. Whether justified or not, environmental groups will take steps to control or completely block actions that involve new mining and refining operations in the US. I may even agree with and support their arguments in this case, but opposition is inevitable. Stating this particular truth in no way implies that environmental preservation is good or bad or that such statements should be modded as troll. Stick to the facts and follow the rules.

      This action by China (if it is not a bluff) represents only a temporary shortfall in supply. Prices will rise, fingers will point, other mining operations will start up and China will lose both business and goodwill. All it takes is Japan's willingness to give China the finger and refuse to negotiate trade agreements in parallel with territory and sovereignty issues. On the flip side, Japan might not have the stones to hold out for an international resolution. In that case, China hikes prices and Japan takes the economic hit in part and the rest of the technological world takes up the remaining slack. All this while China gets richer.

      Because of this, I find it unlikely that China will actually uphold such an embargo. It would be a threat used as a lever, and a weak one at that. This fits with the reported trigger event, a Chinese national held in Japan. China isn't exactly well-known for caring about their people, but it does give them an opportunity to wave the swagger stick a little. Too much and they risk international repercussions, but just a little bit and nobody other than Japan will remember it next week.

    --
    -1 raving lunatic; +6 subGenius... Things even out...
  52. Restricting Exports ineffective by Aaron+Denney · · Score: 2, Informative

    This shouldn't be called an "embargo". They're not preventing anyone else from trading with Japan, only their own nationals, and only rare earths. It's a very very narrowly targetted export ban. The problem is, it can't be effective. Someone else buys a little more in China, sells it to someone else who sells it to someone else who sells it to someone in Japan. It's fungible.

  53. Can they squeeze it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I guess they can get away with this - after all, way too many countries have their balls squeezed by China.

    Who knew politics could be so kinky?

  54. Japan disappoints once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on. The guy was fishing in disputed waters (it's neither yours nor his).
    How would Japan feel if China grabbed some Japanese fisherman in the same waters.
    Just because you can't keep up with your neighbors doesn't give you the rights to disrupt his activities.
    It's like if the Russians grabbed some Alaskan crab fisherman at the Bering straits.

    I wouldn't be so optimistic about Japan in a hot war either.
    It's easy to kick somebody when they are down.
    But most times when Japan had to fight somebody who can fight back they didn't fair real well.
    6 months after Pearl harbor they were in full retreat.
    Got their nose bloodied in Siberia and became a silent partner to the Germans in WW2 (with friends like that..).

    1. Re:Japan disappoints once again by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

      Just you wait till they start building war robots....

      We will all be speaking japanese, watching anime, and eating ramen while washing ti down with a bottle of ramune....

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    2. Re:Japan disappoints once again by tekrat · · Score: 1

      That is mostly due to Japan being a small nation with few resources. They simply don't have the infrastructure to fight a prolonged battle. It has nothing to do with their desire to fight, in WWII, those guys just didn't give up, which played a huge role in the decision to drop the A-bomb versus having a D-Day type invasion of the homeland.

      WWII, if you really think about it, was the triumph of quantity over quality. The Germans were 20 years ahead of us technologically, but they couldn't build enough weapons fast enough. For every Panzer tank they had, we had 20 or 30 Shermans, which were terrible tanks, but we had a lot of them. What America had was lots of infrastructure, lots of resources, and lots of manufacturing capability. Our tech was low-end compared to the Germans, but when they blew up our shit, we just kept cranking out more, and eventually wore them down.

      The Japanese had few resources. After we knocked out their navy, there wasn't much left. And yet, it took us longer to defeat the Japanese than the Germans. They were more spread out, and they were more intractable. And, like I said earlier, they did not give up. They fought to the death, and that resulted in a greater causaulty count in the Pacific than in the European theater.

      The point is: Don't discount Japan's ability to really show some teeth when they want. To this day, their TV Samurai dramas emphasize noble honor in dying while destroying your enemy. That makes them, to put this in geek terms, more like the Klingons -- and therefore, you should consider them dangerous when provoked.

      --
      If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    3. Re:Japan disappoints once again by AltairDusk · · Score: 1

      Just you wait till they start building war robots....

      We will all be speaking japanese, watching anime, and eating ramen while washing ti down with a bottle of ramune....

      I think close to half the students at the engineering school I went to did that already... albeit most could only speak certain phrases learned from the anime.

  55. Re:This is a lesson for China's trading partners.. by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wouldn't be too sure of that mine reopening. If China's state run economy has proved one thing it's that the free-market unmanaged economies of the West will time and again fail to even comprehend the forces arrayed against them. Narrow minded "Market Based" thinking is exactly what got us into this single supplier problem and naively thinking it will get us out is well... naive.

    Whatever you think the "free-market" will do to get us out of this mess, the Chinese economic mega-complex has already considered three moves in advance and is working to counter it. People don't seem to understand that China-Inc is essentially the world greatest ever hyper-corporation: millions of companies, thousands of major corporations, and hundreds of banks all working under one overall direction and policy. Just about every trick you'd expect a major-corporation to pull can and has been considered, strategised and implemented by the this acutely self aware market entity.

    Before anyone begins, this isn't some kind of bigoted post. What's really going on here is that the Chinese Communist Party has developed(invented really) a state controlled, capitalism driven, centrally managed and wholly unified economy; and it's as powerful an apparatus as you'd expect. It's one of the biggest civil and economic developments in world history. And if you expect this electric dragon--a vast, powerful and above all self aware economy under the control of a central brain--to act like your traditionally lauded free market fungus-like economies--efficient, large or small, but hopelessly undirected and prone to bottom feeding-- you are mistaken from the very outset. The Communist Party does not wait for startups, demand, financiers, or any other "market forces" to act. They order entire economic sectors to be created, dismantled and transformed overnight. And it has made them the richest country in the world.

    That's what the Japanese are facing here, and that's what the rest of the world is going to have to face up to as well. If you think a little mine in a mountain pass is going to change things, then you're just another free market crazy barking at the invisible hand of the moon.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  56. Not a dispute over a fisherman by turkeyfish · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is not a dispute over a fisherman. It is a territorial dispute over a very large chunk of water around a disputed island. It is also an opportunity for China to put pressure on Japan and indirectly on the US (which relies on Japanese to manufacture many critical industrial components, many military in nature that can no longer be manufactured in the US because the US is no longer economically competitive in many high-tech industrial technologies. China sees this as an opportunity to exert its growing economic influence at a time that the West is not economically or politically able to respond because it is bogged down in two land wars in Central Asia. They are sending a signal that they are now the dominant power in Asia and the rest of the world can expect them to be the dominant economy in the world in just 10-15 years time at current rates of growth. This will almost certainly happen sooner as the republicans who look as if they are about to come into power are determined to shrink the US government, which will almost certainly speed up the difference in infrastructure and military preparedness. If we get into it with Iran, expect the Chinese who rely heavily on Iranian oil to come into more direct conflict with the US, probably by igniting inflation in the US by pulling their underwriting of US debt instruments that are all that is propping up the US financial system presently.

    If the China Japan situation escalates our treaty obligations will draw us into it. Its unclear how the US will fare being so dependent on middle eastern oil, which can be easily shut off at the Straits of Hormuz by the Iranians and its military highly dependent on satellites for its battlefield and tactical awareness. The strategic petroleum reserve won't last long in an all out draw down. To make matters worse, just a few well coordinated EMP generating blasts in space and the US military will be largely blind. No wonder DARPA is scrambling to counter the new maneuverable Chinese killer satellites with high altitude solar aircraft. My guess is the republicans will let Japan fall to the Chinese and go into a more conciliatory mode to keep the Chinese money needed for tax breaks for billionaires safe.

    1. Re:Not a dispute over a fisherman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you are saying is interesting, but leave your partisanship at the door. You complain that republicans are looking to decrease the size of government, but in the context it doesn't make any sense. It is not like democrats run on a platform of military preparedness.
      If you believe your scenario is plausible, the last thing the country would need is for the federal government to upkeep trillions in liabilities and expansionist programs, like health reform and the like.

      Even if the current republican policy is unfavorable, please tell me how the democrats would address this issue.
      Screw you and your partisan politics.

    2. Re:Not a dispute over a fisherman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warmongering too much in Civ again, have you?

    3. Re:Not a dispute over a fisherman by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      This will almost certainly happen sooner as the republicans who look as if they are about to come into power are determined to shrink the US government, which will almost certainly speed up the difference in infrastructure and military preparedness.

      Where are these magical government shrinking Republicans? In all my years of voting, I must have missed something, as that's something I'd vote for. Instead, we had Bush and Bush Jr (and Reagan) who ballooned the debt and the size of the government. Not that the Democratic party is any better, but these mythical small-government Republicans are nowhere to be found the day after election day.

    4. Re:Not a dispute over a fisherman by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      In practice, "small government" means slower growth of the federal budget, which always grows.

      Sure, it grew quite a bit under Bush Jr for the short period where republicans had all 3 branches locked up, but look what happened when the Democrats got that same unchallenged power: They literally put the pedal to the metal with regards to budget increases. It has never grown at this rate in my lifetime, and in fact, I could probably argue that its grown more in the past 2 years than it did in the previous 12 combined.

      We need competing forces making and challenging spending decisions, so we are far better off if the Republicans take over a branch of government as soon as possible. That doesnt mean that things will suddenly be "OK" again, but right now we are paving a highway to hell with overtime crews working nights and weekends. I'd much prefer that that highway to be paved at the Reagan/Bush Sr/Clinton/Bush Jr rates.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    5. Re:Not a dispute over a fisherman by Compaqt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bringing oil from Iran to China involves going through the Straits of Hormuz (with US ships wandering around), past India to the Straits of Malacca (also patrolled by the US) and some other countries like Vietnam with which China is having a dispute regarding islands.

      That's why they are interested in extending a gas pipeline from Iran to Pakistan to China

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    6. Re:Not a dispute over a fisherman by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, the reason why China is responsible for such a high proportion of the world's production of such Rare Earths is not because they cannot be found anywhere else, but because mining them is messy with poisonous and nature destroying side-effects, so it has been stopped in other places (which are pretty much all over the world).

      All they (the Chinese) will achieve with this is a renaissance of mining operations for Rare Earths all over the world, with the Japanese government investing the money and the Japanese companies the engineering know-how. If the Japanese do put their mind into developing new methods for mining Rare Earths which are more nature friendly, expect that eventually there will be a lot of sources for Rare Earths all over the world.

    7. Re:Not a dispute over a fisherman by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Go find a graph of government spending under all the different presidents since 1980. Tell me who out-spent who.

      I'm not a Democrat or a Republican. I believe both are wrong. And, from where I sit, they are exactly the same for growing the government as big as possible. The only difference is in where the growth of government happens, not how much.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Revenue_and_Expense_to_GDP_Chart_1993_-_2008.png Do you really see a difference in spending that correlates well with the party in power? If there's any, it's the opposite of what you assert.
      http://rondam.blogspot.com/2006/10/why-i-bash-republicans.html
      http://www.kowaldesign.com/budget/
      Both of those are debt-only, and they show who has grown the debt, and it wasn't Democrats. So show me, with numbers, not your personal feelings, why I should believe Republicans are the small government party.

    8. Re:Not a dispute over a fisherman by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      During the Clinton years, it was the Republicans that would not pass a budget that was too big. Lead by Newt Gingrich, the Republicans castrated the Democrat spending plans in 96 and 96. Historical fact not changed by Newt's later ethics violation. Clinton claims credit for greatly reduced deficits, but everyone who was paying attention then knows that it wasn't Clinton, who called the move to block his budget "A Contract On America."

      Now, as for your first graph. Looks to me like things were pretty much getting better from 1980 until 2000 (Reagan, Bush Sr, Clinton), and then went up slightly in early Bush Jr (just like I said, when the republicans had unchallenged power holding House, Senate, and Whitehouse) and then leveled off until 2008, when the democrats took unchallenged power and spending went through the roof.

      ....exactly as I fucking said....
      Perhaps you can't see through the bullshit that is your Love for Democrats to see that I described that fucking graph exactly?

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    9. Re:Not a dispute over a fisherman by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I'm not a Democrat. I never said any party was better than the other. I stated that the Republicans are not a small government party, and you have agreed with me in everything since, but done so as a complete fuckwit.

    10. Re:Not a dispute over a fisherman by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      I'm not a Democrat. I never said any party was better than the other. I stated that the Republicans are not a small government party...

      Look at the graph. End of story. If you dont like the evidence in the graph you provided, then maybe you shouldn't have provided it. Hell, I dont even consider the relation between GDP and federal budget as valid for most arguments, but you obviously do. There is no reason for these two things to be tied to each other, but you obviously think otherwise, but you dont want to swallow the conclusions that can be reached from the graph.

      I am now convinced that you thought that only the president matters, because obviously you had thought that under Reagan that the republicans were in control, and that under Bush Sr the Republicans were in control, and that under Clinton the democrats were in control. Your thinking was wrong every single time. In that 20 year period, nobody ever had a monopoly, yet here you are putting up graphs trying to show that Republicans were bad during the Reagan and Bush Sr periods when it was in fact the Democrats that had House *and* Senate through most of it.

      Obviously you arent educated enough in HOW AMERICA WORKS to make valid arguments. Come back after you read the constitution and understand the roles of each branch of government.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    11. Re:Not a dispute over a fisherman by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Look at the graph.

      I did. You are wrong. The president with the greatest drop, the only one with a consistent drop, was a Democrat. The Republicans, overall, grew the government. You are 100% wrong on all counts.

      Obviously you arent educated enough in HOW AMERICA WORKS to make valid arguments.

      The president must sign the budget. Period. When that changes, give me a call. My number is 1-800-fuck-off.

  57. Re:Not quite that clear cut, but important nonethe by corbettw · · Score: 1

    Screw 'em. It's cheaper to let China dig theirs up until their gone, then we can go after our own. By the time those are used up, we should be able to start mining them from the moon or asteroids.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  58. more evidence to the contrary by 0ptix · · Score: 1

    Indeed the post is one of the few big news sites i could find that even mentions the story. And as pointed out in the parent post they quote all kinds of denials.

    Reuters and BBC for example do not even mention the embargo one way or another.

    Does anyone involved have any evidence one way or another? some one working for a japanese company expecting deliveries for example? It would be nice to get some clarity on this...

  59. Pseudo-capitalism is by turkeyfish · · Score: 1

    Pseudo-capitalism is just another name for socialism republican style. The rich and their corporations use the government to subsidize their businesses through tax write-offs and no-bid contracts, and absorb any losses, while the poor and middle-class consumers can work harder to pay for it.

    In China its pretty much the same thing, only the rich capitalists are high ranking party officials and the military. The only real difference is that the Chinese have cut out the middlemen, politicians that are bought by the rich to foster the pretense of a truly capitalist system, where markets operate fairly. Without the middlemen, the Chinese are able to invest heavily in infrastructure, education, and health-care that it propelling their economy on 4-8% growth for the past 30 years.

  60. Food by DavMz · · Score: 1

    It's true that Japan isn't self-sufficient in food (coverage ~43%), and the only product where they are self-sufficient is rice, thanks partially to high tariffs on rice import.
    If I go to the closest supermarket and look at fresh products, I got: milk from Nagano / Hokkaido prefecture, lettuce from Miike prefecture, salmon from Chile, beef from Australia, pork from the US, chicken from Aichi prefecture. Of course, bananas are from the Philippines, oranges from California, onions from China, and for transformed products the origin is not mentioned.

  61. didn't happen by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    you actually believe that myth?

    there was a Troy, but no such war

  62. History is written by the writers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "History is written by the victors" is a canard and it's a pet peeve of mine. History is not written by the victors. It is written by the writers. Our records of the decline of the Roman Empire don't come from the German barbarians.

  63. Re:This is a lesson for China's trading partners.. by turkeyfish · · Score: 1

    "over fishing rights"

    Keep in mind those fishing rights keep millions of people fed.

  64. Yet another reason why "made in the usa" is a good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always wonder how people don't consider the possibility that economies of scale work best with friendly nations with very low likelihoods of confrontation. Say the the USA and Japan or Europe. Communist nations which consider our culture alien and incorrect will always use such tactics on us, we have rare earth minerals here, we have contacts in Africa to get others yet we'd rather buy from an aggressive xenophobic nation who has shown over and over when business is not in their favor that they will take their ball and glove and go play elsewhere. See currency manipulation for examples. Why we ever gave them favored trade status never made any sense to me; they clearly never gave it back to us.

  65. Which are all of us by DCFusor · · Score: 1

    Well, you might be correct, temporarily. As pointed out above, when things are right, Japan has done pretty well too -- and with a similar plan MITI used to strike fear into us here for example, but no more. Could it be something more basic, like demographics? Japan is sinking as their population ages, similar to the USA. China, due to the one child policy will soon face the same thing themselves, not enough young to support the old. Japan is developing robots to help their older folks survive, and maybe we should be looking into that ourselves, as our demographic curves aren't all that different. There are makers and takers (no, not the old saw, exactly). Only in the middle of life is one a net contribution to their society, if even then. The young are supported, as are the old. Our baby boomers are all hitting retirement, hence various effects on entitlement programs (gawd how I hate that word and what it implies), the investment markets, and it's as predictable as the earth's rotation, but no one wants to see the the light at the end of the tunnel is a train and think about what to do about it. GoodLuckWithThat, as we say here, it's not rocket science to predict the broad sweep of the future from this kind of information. Exactly when things hit a tipping point is hard to predict, but not IF they will. We are living in what's about to be really interesting times, and yes, I mean that in the Chinese sense.

    --
    Why guess when you can know? Measure!
  66. Re:Not quite that clear cut, but important nonethe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Actually, the lack of question marks and a profit step betray him as a non-business major.

  67. Re:This is a lesson for China's trading partners.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not exactly a little mine in a mountain pass. It's got 20 megatons of known ore reserves, which contain about 1.78 megatons of REE oxides. This mine supplied most of the world's REE consumption until ~ 1995. It was shut down due to environmental restrictions and the reduction in REE price from China's ramp-up. It's being re-opened with a $500M investment by Molycorp Minerals LLC. The supply choke in China will only accelerate development of alternative REE from known extra-China reserves.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_Pass_rare_earth_mine

  68. Re:This is a lesson for China's trading partners.. by RobinEggs · · Score: 1

    And it has made them the richest country in the world.

    If I could quibble a bit here, I'm not sure they're actually the most wealthy nation in the world as measured by total assets, and I'm almost certain they're still on the lower half in terms of assets per person. Just because they're getting trillions in export sales and US debt payments doesn't mean they're particularly wealthy in any socially meaningful sense; there's 1.2 freaking billion of them to split that pie, and it's split even more unevenly than in the US. Only the upper class, as in top 20% or less, live as well as or better than Americans with the median income.

    They may have a ridiculous pile of cash and a huge industrial machine, but it's not doing all that much for them so far.

  69. Re:Not quite that clear cut, but important nonethe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1.5 get environmental laws changed

  70. Re:This is a lesson for China's trading partners.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tend to agree with you but I think that you discount the startups and free markets in the other countries. Those drive inovation, China sees it, maneuvers, works to counter it, absorbs it, and makes it its own. The ultimate "Borg" economy if you will... I just wonder if China's centrally controlled economy could ever come up with something new on its own.

  71. Re:This is a lesson for China's trading partners.. by z-j-y · · Score: 1

    Even among Chinese people, only few could be so delusional about China's true economy power. There is really very little to brag about at the high end. The reform has been in progress for 30 years, the result isn't anywhere close to what other countries achieved in 30 years after WWII.

    Isn't it interesting that American left loves dictatorship? They adored Hitler. Then Soviet. Now China. The idea of forced labor is so dear to them, just like the Democrat in the 19th century.

    People who complain about the ineffectiveness of American capitalism should explain why USA has been the lead for so many years. The mightiest centrally planned economy, Soviet Union, what happened to it? What has it contributed to human advancement in its lifetime?

  72. Re:Yet another reason why "made in the usa" is a g by jonwil · · Score: 1

    The US needs to throw a bunch of money subsidizing manufacturing of stuff (toys, clothing, shoes, household goods etc) in Mexico.

    Has several benifits:
    1.More stuff being made in Mexico means more people are needed to make it which means more jobs for Mexicans and less Mexicans who want to cross the border into the US
    2.Less dependance on China as a source for stuff
    3.Less risk of "third shift" and IP violations (unlike China where the Chinese government and Chinese companies routienly use trade secrets, proprietary information, patented technology, copyrighted materials, trademarks etc with impunity either to produce bootleg products or to make the home-grown products better, those things dont happen in Mexico as far as I know)
    4.The ability for retailers like Wal-Mart to play Chinese and Mexican manufacturers off against each other on pricing (i.e. they can use the price quoted to them from one factory in one country as a bargaining chip against another manufacturer in the other country)
    5.Easy access to the US with faster shipping times and lower shipping costs.

  73. We have more than enough- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have more than enough- we throw everything in the trash, so someday we will start mining the landfills and find more than enough rare earths, precious metals, etc. Sadly some has been dumped in the ocean- that will be more difficult to retrieve.

  74. and furthermore by nten · · Score: 1

    He who can destroy the magnets, controls the magnets, and he who controls the magnets, controls the universe.

    Stupid control freaks, I for one... lets just say I would have fought on the "other" side of the Butlerian Jihad.

    --
    refactor the law, its bloated, confusing and unmaintainable.
  75. Re:Yet another reason why "made in the usa" is a g by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

    What about all of those jobs Americans refuse to, maybe we can import our unskilled labor from India, I like curry better than tacos, win-win.

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  76. Thorium reactors for electric power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thorium can be considered "expensive to dispose of" or it can be used as valuable nuclear fuel in electricity production. Thorium is common, easily accessable, and a much better and safer fuel than uranium, with the disadvantage that it cannot be used to create nuclear weapons. Thorium reactors do not "melt down" because the radioactive core is in liquid form, pumped through the system continuously, and are thus much safer to run than solid fuel reactors. Thorium reactor research was shut down by the Reagan administration, in yet another stupidity of politics and "finance" over useful science. Developing rare earth resources would be much cheaper if the thorium that is produced as a natural byproduct were used as a fuel.

  77. Not confirmed by sydneyfong · · Score: 3, Informative

    As of now, the Chinese government is denying that there is an embargo over Rare Earth exports.

    http://english.cri.cn/6826/2010/09/24/1821s596078.htm
    http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTKB00705420100924

    There might still be some element of truth to it, but all the reports are getting confusing.

    --
    Don't quote me on this.
    1. Re:Not confirmed by rtega · · Score: 1

      Please mod this up as this report clearly is not true!

  78. Re:This is a lesson for China's trading partners.. by dbIII · · Score: 1

    People don't seem to understand that China-Inc is essentially the world greatest ever hyper-corporation: millions of companies, thousands of major corporations, and hundreds of banks all working under one overall direction and policy.

    That's just a weird misunderstanding to grow your own conspiracy theory. It is nowhere near being organised. The state ownership is really just another way to tax.

  79. It is but what are you going to do? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    To change it, you have to get a whole new international treaty. All this shit is from old treaties hashed out long ago to try and solve the problem of what is mine and what is yours.

    Not saying they can't be changed, but it isn't trivial You have to get all the countries together for a big round of negotiations and of course people aren't going to want to change and so on and so forth.

    International law is complicated and rather difficult to change.

  80. China is a threat to world peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China is trying to flex its muscles way too much these days. Someone needs to remind them that they are a shitty third world country, and keep them within their limits. Seriously, China needs to have its wings clipped. An international coalition of intelligence agencies - from the USA, UK, France, Germany, Japan, India, Australia, etc. - they should all get together and put that shitty country China in its place.

  81. And by mahadiga · · Score: 1

    Every nation should be self-sufficient in production of their food grains.
    Hope WTO regulates accordingly.

    --
    I'd like to buy homeland for our 10 million people. http://twitter.com/mahadiga
    1. Re:And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And:

      You should stop providing a subject line of 'And' for all your posts. It makes you sound like a retard if it's done too often.

    2. Re:And by mahadiga · · Score: 1

      And:

      You should stop posting unsolicited suggestions. It makes you sound like a retard if it's done too often.

      --
      I'd like to buy homeland for our 10 million people. http://twitter.com/mahadiga
  82. Rare Exports? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    In other news, Finland embargos Rare Exports to the rest of the world...

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  83. Re:This is a lesson for China's trading partners.. by Seth+Kriticos · · Score: 1

    I don't think that the parent measured their wealth by the living standards of the majority population. I think he was summing up the cash pile that the country has altogether, most of it in the hands of very few, politically engaged individuals, companies and the political party.

    And yes, he is probably right. China owns most of the United States debt (they are not buying more though, too volatile), they are building up a big pile of gold, invest in raw material producing industries abroad, they have an immense market production capacity for electronics and consumer goods and well established production chains backed by local mining / resource supply sources.

    They also engage in R&D abroad and at home very actively, and they also study the products that are produced in their factories contracted by foreign companies. And they are starting to apply the knowledge.

    The political leadership there does not give a flying fuck about the average Chinese Joe though, who lives in a horribly polluted environment (part of the reason why nobody can compete with them) on a very tight budget (another reason) and can only buy crap in shops (merchandise in China is often very sub-par to our standards).

    Please don't confuse social wealth / a somewhat evenly distributed wealth system with a huge pile of assets, even if it is only owned by very few.

  84. alright back to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BBC

    Looks like the Japs have decided to release the fisherman after Chinks grabbed some Jap tourists.
    Way to show them who's boss Tojo (they do make some nice cameras though).

  85. The answer is partnership by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The problem with rare-earth mining is that, since the materials are rare, the waste problem is huge. The early stages of extractoin are messy. Big acid lakes, things like that.

    Aha! Then who has a lot of money, and a need for large acid lakes?

    The answer: Mafia!

    Therefore if the mines simply partner with the Mafia, they will have enough subsidy and capital to get going, while the cost of running the witness protection program is also reduced at the same time. It's a Win-Win-Win!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  86. Japan and South America getting closer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The current major rare earth metal exporter is China due to not caring about the environment in the mining and refining/smelting of the metals, and a complete lack of worker safety.

    The former major US rare earth metal suppliers (who had mines with substantial reserves left) basically got undercut and were forced out of the market, plus to meet new demand they would have had to pool money to create a new shared refining plant in the US, due to the costs to be compliant with environmental pollution laws and worker chemical/metal exposure laws. Various south american countries also had mines with big reserves, but they cared a little more about employee health and safety than the chinese, so they basically are in the minority of the market.

    I would assume that considering the foreign aid relations with south american countries, those countries could ramp up to meet japanese demand. The US could also ramp up to meet demand if the new refining facility were built, but they would charge too much for the japanese. There is always the weird situation of US mined ore being refined in south america too. I imagine the stocks for various rare earth metal mining and refining companies in the US just went up...

  87. l33tspock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    scares me a bit, but not because I am afraid of the human races destruction, it frightens me for the all too inevitable end of the individual. We cannot manage ourselves, when we depend on personal insights to direct us to effective or profitless ends.

    Perhaps China's got things right, they are certainly more effective and driven in their focus, even if in some ways more narrow. On the whole they are outproducing, outsourcing, and out-thinking many of their western counterparts, "it will be fine" you say. You are all pathetic, many of you cannot think beyond the next drug to take, be it coffee or cocaine, a good morning sexing or a tired day of work.

    You are drones yourself, waiting and willing to lose your independence because you choose not to use it, or have no idea how, you should just hand it over to someone who can manage, and you will, because you have nothing better to do with your life. You know it, and will doubtless prove me right.

  88. SELYB's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They shouldn't have fucking started it then, should they? When you go looking for trouble you can't cry foul when you find it - or it finds you - big time.

  89. TFA wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TFA is wrong, China didn't set any embargo:
    http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2010-09/24/content_11340909.htm

    in other news, Japan released the Captain.
    http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/2010-09/24/content_11341304.htm

  90. US debt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what do you think will happen if US debt becomes expensive? I'm pretty sure you don't want to live through that if you're in the USA....

  91. What about water? by pablo_max · · Score: 1

    China has a very serious water problem. It has now reached the critical level. China relies on the west for water treatment tech. Why not just put an embargo on all water treatment tech and chemicals. Most folks would rather have water than metals.
    I know they have lots of rivers, but the water is too polluted. In fact, in many places the water is so polluted that it can't even be used for agro.

  92. Thank you China! by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...because, you see, a lot of people have become tired of the United States. It's very fashionable right now to hate the US and highlight everything that's wrong with the American agenda. Even in the relatively short span since the end of the Cold War, and due to some relatively severe foreign-policy bungling by the last administration, much of world opinion has focused gleefully on the failings of the US as the sole remaining superpower. Much is true.

    However, any reasonable examination of a situation can only be assessed fairly when one considers the realistic alternative possibilities.

    Now, with the growth of China, Asian powers may start to recognize that perhaps the (relatively) benign incompetence of the US isn't quite so bad. Every time China throws its weight around, one might be reminded that China doesn't really have much of a history of plurality, openness, liberality, or empathy. In fact, the only times that they haven't been expansive (within their understood natural frontiers), brutal, corrupt, and oppressive is when they've been too incompetent to manage their own massive domestic failings.

    Perhaps the grass on the other side of the Pax Americana fence may not be that shimmering green that some seemed to think it was. Thanks China for doing your best to remind everyone.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:Thank you China! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD PARENT UP.

      China sucks. The world will be a sad and sorry place if thuggish and brutal countries like China get really powerful. This is the situation when they are still a third world country with a relatively modest military. Imagine what they would do if they ever become as powerful as the US? Already almost all their neighbours are pissed off with them - Vietnam, India, Japan... China sucks.

  93. Re:This is a lesson for China's trading partners.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China's system only works as long as it's the only one doing it. It's a classic prisoner dilemma.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoner_dilemma

  94. Re:This is a lesson for China's trading partners.. by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

    And yes, he is probably right. China owns most of the United States debt

    Seven percent of foreign debt. That is all.

  95. no thanks by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure I want friends that are only around when they need our help.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  96. Asteroids mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time for a new Apollo program to reach the technological level to mining asteriods at industrial scale.
    Some asteroids are (supposed to be) very rich on this scarce elements.
    And asteroids are so abundant that this won't be a problem on very long time.

  97. Re:This is a lesson for China's trading partners.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't it interesting that American left loves dictatorship? They adored Hitler. Then Soviet. Now China. The idea of forced labor is so dear to them, just like the Democrat in the 19th century.

    This is so insane and vacuous, I don't even know how to begin responding to it.

  98. Re:Not quite that clear cut, but important nonethe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Rare-Earth-Metal Bottleneck mentions that another major source will come from Europe in 2012. China supplies more than 95% of the rare earth metals. One solution is to have Japan buy their rare earth metals from, for example, Indonesia. Indonesia may still get rare earth metals from China. Indonesia gets a small profit as a middleman/broker in the transaction. Your touch screen device now costs a couple extra bucks.

  99. Re:This is a lesson for China's trading partners.. by Peeteriz · · Score: 1

    Who cares about the individual wealth? When power is measured, then the nice houses, cars and electronics owned by american suburbians and clay huts 'owned' by chinese countryside rice farmers are completely irrelevant, what matters is the cash used by the country or the elite for strategic means of control.

    China cash piles are used to buy strategic assets like mineral mines in Africa. USA private millionaire cash piles would move away to switzerland or anywhere else as soon as any trouble starts, and still will be used for consumption.

  100. It could be worse... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    I am pretty sure when the English and French were duking it out in Canada it was about Beavers and Fish. At least metal is shiny, and rare earths can do interesting things not just filthy water rat fur and stinky fish. Eh? :)

  101. Re:This is a lesson for China's trading partners.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please don't confuse social wealth / a somewhat evenly distributed wealth system with a huge pile of assets, even if it is only owned by very few.

    I think I very clearly distinguished between total assets and what I called "a socially meaningful" sense of being wealthy; I'm not confusing anything.

  102. Re:This is a lesson for China's trading partners.. by dtjohnson · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't be too sure of that mine reopening.

    Why not? The mine is owned by Molycorp which was a subsidiary of Unocal Corp and then of Chevron after Chevron's acquisition of Unocal in 2005. China attempted to purchase Unocal in 2005 but was overruled by the Bush Adminisration. Molycorp is now a privately-owned spinoff of Chevron and began processing stockpiled rare earth ore last year. As they work down their inventory of ore, they will obtain more from their mine. The mine obtained a new 30-year operating permit in 2004. Unless you're planning on sabotage or military strikes, there seems to be no reason why Molycorp will not remove more ore from the mine beginning in 2011. Do you have any information to the contrary or are you just giving voice to vague worries and fears?

  103. Re:Not quite that clear cut, but important nonethe by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

    Business majors look for profits. Engineers look for solutions.

  104. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real eye open here is that green energy (wind turbines) and green transportation (hybrid cars) are dependent on rare earth minerals primarily provided by China. Why be dependent on the middle east for our technology when we could be wholly dependent on China?!

  105. No problem! by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 1

    Japan just has to order some children's toys.

    If it's on the periodic table, you can find it in there.