Let me get it straight -- you want to keep NSA away from your personal data? NSA spends billions of dollars to snoop your data while Chinese government spend billions of dollars sending people to space trying to mine the resources from outer space. Which is more stupid?
When my kids are fighting for the same toy, I would take the toy away from both of them. If they don't learn how to play nice, neither of them get the toy.
The solution is obvious to me, if both parties couldn't play nice living on the same piece of land, nuke it. No one get it:-) The world will be peace again. No?
You think US would allow their most sophisticated weapon design to be stolen by kids in China? No. I think what's really happening behind the scene are:
a) the designs are faked -- it wants to drain Chinese resources on building something that never works
b) US government wants to introduce a legislature to curb on internet activity. They put out this type of news to support their intent.
c) all the above
Currently though the telco in Brazil is likely charging Rogers/Bell/Telus $1.50 for the $50G of data and Rogers/Bell/Telus turns around to charge the customer $50,000. Joking aside, the code does not say the telco couldn't cut you off after you incur so much roaming fees.
We need a class action law suit against google for not paying his "employees". I am sure a lot of us have used GOOG-411 before. Google may have used the data/result generated in goog411 to develop Majel. They need to pay each of us $0.07 for every call we made to goog-411.
Let me get it straight -- you want to keep NSA away from your personal data? NSA spends billions of dollars to snoop your data while Chinese government spend billions of dollars sending people to space trying to mine the resources from outer space. Which is more stupid?
.... I did my survey on 2 people, the one who answer they love NSA phone tracking get a carrot from me.
I think a linux presence on new smart phone hardware is long overdue. What's up for debate is -- ubuntu.
Of course Apple can do things like that because the iphone you're holding is a loaner. It will be yours once it is dead.
The India population is 1.241 billion according to google. It would be hard press to find a cheaper alternative other than human soldier.
If we start questioning the legality of this type of privacy intrusion, the government will accuse us with on terrorist's or child molester's side.
Hire a fresh grad as a network admin ....!? This only happens on MS shop.
When my kids are fighting for the same toy, I would take the toy away from both of them. If they don't learn how to play nice, neither of them get the toy. The solution is obvious to me, if both parties couldn't play nice living on the same piece of land, nuke it. No one get it :-) The world will be peace again. No?
You think US would allow their most sophisticated weapon design to be stolen by kids in China? No. I think what's really happening behind the scene are: a) the designs are faked -- it wants to drain Chinese resources on building something that never works b) US government wants to introduce a legislature to curb on internet activity. They put out this type of news to support their intent. c) all the above
Currently though the telco in Brazil is likely charging Rogers/Bell/Telus $1.50 for the $50G of data and Rogers/Bell/Telus turns around to charge the customer $50,000. Joking aside, the code does not say the telco couldn't cut you off after you incur so much roaming fees.
Anytime a new i-device is released, it will be sold millions ... oh wait, that was so 2009.
We need a class action law suit against google for not paying his "employees". I am sure a lot of us have used GOOG-411 before. Google may have used the data/result generated in goog411 to develop Majel. They need to pay each of us $0.07 for every call we made to goog-411.
This got to be Obama's fault. Didn't he meet Canadian prime minister just last week.
Since when we share the resources equally? I say winner takes all -- that's inline with our current system
That's just great. What else are on the table?