No, as YOU keep saying, it will never be eradicated. You're the only poster who keeps noting that. A lot of other people have replied to your various posts, pointing out that while it's partly true on a technical level, it's actually wrong.
That's because big-L Libertarians are just Republicans in disguise. They don't want smaller government, they just want government spending shifted from social programs to police and military programs, while rolling back civil rights as much as they can in the meantime.
To me this only seems a step or two beyond running a book through a thesaurus and passing it off as your own. I think this is the first pro-copyright story I've ever agreed with. From wikipedia, on derivative works: "For copyright protection to attach to a later, allegedly derivative work, it must display some originality of its own. It cannot be a rote, uncreative variation on the earlier, underlying work. The latter work must contain sufficient new expression, over and above that embodied in the earlier work for the latter work to satisfy copyright law’s requirement of originality." That sounds like a reasonable rule to me.
This thing actually uses the original textbook as an input, and then produces an output that is as close as possible without being the same. How is that in any way original or adding new expression? "The Wind Done Gone" was banned (which I think was wrong), and it was far more creative than this process.
Porn has not damaged my marriage. But I guess it's just one of those transient unstable 12-year relationships in which we have a child.
Maybe you should look at how you wrote "addicted" and realize that the problem could have been literally anything. He could have been addicted to WoW, Harry Potter, whatever, and it would have still destroyed his family.
If I think I see a drug deal going down, I don't arm myself, go ask them what they're doing, and then get off the hook when I have to shoot and kill three people. That would be ridiculous, and pave the way for all sorts of vigilante murders.
If Zimmerman believed this kid was going to cause problems, he shouldn't have left his car or approached at all. He called the police already and they recommended he stay away.
It's hard to believe he's not at least charged with manslaughter. If he was actually out looking for a fight, I would easily call it murder.
Exactly. If I had the inclination (and access to child porn) I could probably put child porn on half the servers on the internet. It wouldn't be hard to write up something that automates it and uploads CP in every file field it crawls online, or even just post a base-64 encoded version in the comment fields of any site that doesn't allow file uploads. In fact, that would be even better, because in your typical CMS, text content is just marked as deleted but actually kept there forever.
I wouldn't be surprised if half the webservers on the internet didn't already have CP on them in exactly the same fashion. Even after moderating an image it's generally not deleted (in fact, isn't that technically illegal? You find someone uploaded CP to your server and delete it, you've just destroyed evidence in a crime).
So basically, any server at any time can be taken for claims of CP.
But then, that's pretty much exactly what prosecutors want.
And then, as has been mentioned in other threads, you probably ended up paying the same overpriced monthly cost as someone who got their phone for "free" from the same contract.
Ah, see, you've got it all wrong. "Autistic" these days means a child who is either shy or sometimes misbehaves. It also simultaneously means Rain Man, so that they can paint their child as a gifted indigo child on a higher plane of reality.
I feel an overwhelming urge to scream at anyone who says "I think I/my child might have a bit of autism/asperger's" because they clearly have no clue what it's actually like to have either one.
I think the reason so many people love the term "spectrum" now is that when they're called on their bullshit, they can still claim that they do have asperger's, just on the high-functioning end of the spectrum.
Yeah, but the problem is, most people don't even know (metaphorically) which pedal to push to make the car go faster, or if they do, they have no idea how fast the car is capable of going, how to refill the gas, change a flat tire, or how much any of the above or the car itself should even cost.
Anyone who is serious about advancing in their field should try to learn the basics of modern technology. They don't need to learn protocols or server architecture, but they should learn a bit ABOUT them.
As someone with a degree in CS doing web development, I agree completely. I got a job doing it during during high school and then shortly after graduating college I moved but went freelance rather than finding a real "CS job", because I already had the contacts and work coming in.
I have been seeing more and more of what the article is talking about, however, and I'm loving it. I no longer feel any guilt about having to bill my hourly rate for intern-level work, because most of the intern-level work (CSS, html, configuring a CMS) is now being handled by the clients themselves. So, instead of spending 80% of my time doing what feels like overpriced demeaning grunt work, I can refocus my energies on creating new interesting things for clients, things that actually flex my brain and make me feel good.
Nevermind, it sounds like they've spent $200 million on this system since its inception and the site goes down due to traffic every year... that's some extreme incompetence at work.
They have a population of less than 5 million, so limiting to 300000 concurrent logins (6% of the total population) doesn't sound too crazy. Worst case, everyone wakes up on tax morning and goes to check online, and not everybody gets in until the end of the day.
They probably had a fixed budget, with limited hardware, and/or didn't have the time to make it scalable.
Others have pointed out that the $100 shipping is also from France to the US. I can't even ship 18 pounds of food from the US to Europe for under $100, so considering this is a breakable and insured server, that sounds like a great price to me.
The grumpy old man in me is just bitter about the direction in which it's evolving. Most of its changes (such as this one) are driven entirely by marketing-speak bullshit from ad executives who never really learned English in the first place. When they create new words, they tend to replace perfectly fine existing words, sound terrible (seriously, "impactful"?), and are irregular forms in regards to the rest of the language.
False positives aside, the real fun is going to start when DNA becomes the only tool police know how to use (because everyone is in the DNA database). Then, all you have to do to frame someone is borrow their hairbrush.
You know, it's probably a good thing the US has a medieval health care system, because fear of insurance costs going up is pretty much the only objection I ever hear for DNA tracking.
Most of the people I know who voted for Obama (myself included) now despise the man.
The public hasn't spoken in favor of bailouts, TSA, and war. The problem is, the two major political parties are pretty much on the exact same side (their own), and the public has been convinced voting for a third party is useless.
Slashdot Mirror
That's a really good way of putting it, I agree completely. Just wanted to let you know, since I have no mod points :)
But then what's the point of being rich if it doesn't mean that you're above the law?
Actually, yeah, we do. We need to quit trying to make research provide immediate monetary value and let research just be research.
No, as YOU keep saying, it will never be eradicated. You're the only poster who keeps noting that. A lot of other people have replied to your various posts, pointing out that while it's partly true on a technical level, it's actually wrong.
You're not evil, I just hope your kids end up smarter than you.
That's because big-L Libertarians are just Republicans in disguise. They don't want smaller government, they just want government spending shifted from social programs to police and military programs, while rolling back civil rights as much as they can in the meantime.
To me this only seems a step or two beyond running a book through a thesaurus and passing it off as your own. I think this is the first pro-copyright story I've ever agreed with. From wikipedia, on derivative works: "For copyright protection to attach to a later, allegedly derivative work, it must display some originality of its own. It cannot be a rote, uncreative variation on the earlier, underlying work. The latter work must contain sufficient new expression, over and above that embodied in the earlier work for the latter work to satisfy copyright law’s requirement of originality." That sounds like a reasonable rule to me.
This thing actually uses the original textbook as an input, and then produces an output that is as close as possible without being the same. How is that in any way original or adding new expression? "The Wind Done Gone" was banned (which I think was wrong), and it was far more creative than this process.
Porn has not damaged my marriage. But I guess it's just one of those transient unstable 12-year relationships in which we have a child.
Maybe you should look at how you wrote "addicted" and realize that the problem could have been literally anything. He could have been addicted to WoW, Harry Potter, whatever, and it would have still destroyed his family.
Having been married for plenty of years, I've concluded pretty much the opposite as you.
I'm sorry you aren't able to handle porn, but even suggesting it might be harmful to "most marriages" is ridiculous.
If I think I see a drug deal going down, I don't arm myself, go ask them what they're doing, and then get off the hook when I have to shoot and kill three people. That would be ridiculous, and pave the way for all sorts of vigilante murders.
If Zimmerman believed this kid was going to cause problems, he shouldn't have left his car or approached at all. He called the police already and they recommended he stay away.
It's hard to believe he's not at least charged with manslaughter. If he was actually out looking for a fight, I would easily call it murder.
Exactly. If I had the inclination (and access to child porn) I could probably put child porn on half the servers on the internet. It wouldn't be hard to write up something that automates it and uploads CP in every file field it crawls online, or even just post a base-64 encoded version in the comment fields of any site that doesn't allow file uploads. In fact, that would be even better, because in your typical CMS, text content is just marked as deleted but actually kept there forever.
I wouldn't be surprised if half the webservers on the internet didn't already have CP on them in exactly the same fashion. Even after moderating an image it's generally not deleted (in fact, isn't that technically illegal? You find someone uploaded CP to your server and delete it, you've just destroyed evidence in a crime).
So basically, any server at any time can be taken for claims of CP.
But then, that's pretty much exactly what prosecutors want.
And then, as has been mentioned in other threads, you probably ended up paying the same overpriced monthly cost as someone who got their phone for "free" from the same contract.
Ah, see, you've got it all wrong. "Autistic" these days means a child who is either shy or sometimes misbehaves. It also simultaneously means Rain Man, so that they can paint their child as a gifted indigo child on a higher plane of reality.
I feel an overwhelming urge to scream at anyone who says "I think I/my child might have a bit of autism/asperger's" because they clearly have no clue what it's actually like to have either one.
I think the reason so many people love the term "spectrum" now is that when they're called on their bullshit, they can still claim that they do have asperger's, just on the high-functioning end of the spectrum.
Yeah, but the problem is, most people don't even know (metaphorically) which pedal to push to make the car go faster, or if they do, they have no idea how fast the car is capable of going, how to refill the gas, change a flat tire, or how much any of the above or the car itself should even cost.
Anyone who is serious about advancing in their field should try to learn the basics of modern technology. They don't need to learn protocols or server architecture, but they should learn a bit ABOUT them.
As someone with a degree in CS doing web development, I agree completely. I got a job doing it during during high school and then shortly after graduating college I moved but went freelance rather than finding a real "CS job", because I already had the contacts and work coming in.
I have been seeing more and more of what the article is talking about, however, and I'm loving it. I no longer feel any guilt about having to bill my hourly rate for intern-level work, because most of the intern-level work (CSS, html, configuring a CMS) is now being handled by the clients themselves. So, instead of spending 80% of my time doing what feels like overpriced demeaning grunt work, I can refocus my energies on creating new interesting things for clients, things that actually flex my brain and make me feel good.
If you're on the plane, chances are it's safe to fly.
Nevermind, it sounds like they've spent $200 million on this system since its inception and the site goes down due to traffic every year... that's some extreme incompetence at work.
They have a population of less than 5 million, so limiting to 300000 concurrent logins (6% of the total population) doesn't sound too crazy. Worst case, everyone wakes up on tax morning and goes to check online, and not everybody gets in until the end of the day.
They probably had a fixed budget, with limited hardware, and/or didn't have the time to make it scalable.
Unless they're being used as money shelters in some way, passing debt on to descendants is barbaric.
Others have pointed out that the $100 shipping is also from France to the US. I can't even ship 18 pounds of food from the US to Europe for under $100, so considering this is a breakable and insured server, that sounds like a great price to me.
How often do you think lab rats are released into the wild when they're no longer being tested on?
The grumpy old man in me is just bitter about the direction in which it's evolving. Most of its changes (such as this one) are driven entirely by marketing-speak bullshit from ad executives who never really learned English in the first place. When they create new words, they tend to replace perfectly fine existing words, sound terrible (seriously, "impactful"?), and are irregular forms in regards to the rest of the language.
False positives aside, the real fun is going to start when DNA becomes the only tool police know how to use (because everyone is in the DNA database). Then, all you have to do to frame someone is borrow their hairbrush.
You know, it's probably a good thing the US has a medieval health care system, because fear of insurance costs going up is pretty much the only objection I ever hear for DNA tracking.
Most of the people I know who voted for Obama (myself included) now despise the man.
The public hasn't spoken in favor of bailouts, TSA, and war. The problem is, the two major political parties are pretty much on the exact same side (their own), and the public has been convinced voting for a third party is useless.