It is a 64 Ia64 I2 running Windows that does about 606K transactions per minute which is a winner, a 32 IBM Power4 running AIX and DB2 (most likely with large pages, 128MB page size) gets about 600K so does the 32 IA62 running Linux. So it looks like windows suck in terms of transactions per minute.
If you want to use performance tools like the Performance Inspector on Mac OS X, get the CHUD tools from http://developer.apple.com/tools/performance/. They provide a GUI so you do not need to use the command line expect for amber, the instruction tracer. Shikari is a profiler that can use the CPU PMC(performance monitor counters), it can show you where your hot spot is in asm but gives line information if you compiled with -g.
Re:gcc 3.x compilers have serious C++ perfs issues
on
GCC 3.3 Released
·
· Score: 3, Informative
The changes that made C++ compiling slower were for correctness of the compiler so they are needed. I know 3.4 will be faster than 3.3 is(/was), and should be able to speed up even faster.
Correctness is more important than compile time that is why it is being pushed back, most of the compile time regressions have to do with the inliner and its limits.
Linux, the kernel, depends on old gcc extensions that are slowly being removed from gcc, extensions that were not documented. Also c++ compile time is a hard thing to fix if you want a full c++ compiler in a short period of time. 3.3 is very stable compiler, even 3.4 in the cvs is a stable compiler. The gcc team are all volunteers so why do you not help them and fix some problems, and/or report some problems to us (I am slowing helping out now).
They cannot sue them again, the suite against the BSD's between then AT&T and BSDco was settled out of court (by that time Novell took over UNIX) and the code was removed and also they agreed to not sue BSD any more. SCO took over UNIX from Novell. The rest is history as we know it.
Sounds like OpenDoc from Apple, IBM, and Novell, which failed because of Novell not doing the Windows port fast enough. Apple had their version for Mac OS, remember the Web Browser before Safari by Apple. IBM had their port of OS/2 done also. Even Microsoft was on board for the Mac version with Office for OpenDoc on the way.
Slashdot Mirror
I thought the Judge in the case of Bell Labs (Novell) vs BSD said that comments did not matter when it came to copyright terms dealing with code?
50 years, more like 100 years, it was called something different 100 years ago but still the same IBM. It made counting machines used for the census.
An even better than both of those two crapper products and older. Faster to build and faster to depoly.
It is a 64 Ia64 I2 running Windows that does about 606K transactions per minute which is a winner, a 32 IBM Power4 running AIX and DB2 (most likely with large pages, 128MB page size) gets about 600K so does the 32 IA62 running Linux. So it looks like windows suck in terms of transactions per minute.
That should have been Intel.
It is called VTune by Inte.
If you want to use performance tools like the Performance Inspector on Mac OS X, get the CHUD tools from http://developer.apple.com/tools/performance/. They provide a GUI so you do not need to use the command line expect for amber, the instruction tracer.
Shikari is a profiler that can use the CPU PMC(performance monitor counters), it can show you where your hot spot is in asm but gives line information if you compiled with -g.
actually have caused problems; 3 years late but still.
So is Apple's Chief software, Avie is also one of the ones who write the Mach microkernel, in fact Avie was the main guy in writing the kernel.
Now Xenix is OpenServer, also it was SCO UNIX at one point at a time: http://www.levenez.com/unix/history.html
Do people already forgot that an UNIX from M$ had happened called XENIX which became SCO OpenServer?
Sounds like the Vorager Episode with Que's child.
It is not on the standard track but the RFC is only `Informational'.
In the release notes for gcc 3.3, there is a note about accessing PR's.
Try this link instead: http://gcc.gnu.org/PR8610, it is smaller and easier to remember.
The changes that made C++ compiling slower were for correctness of the compiler so they are needed. I know 3.4 will be faster than 3.3 is(/was), and should be able to speed up even faster.
Correctness is more important than compile time that is why it is being pushed back, most of the compile time regressions have to do with the inliner and its limits.
Linux, the kernel, depends on old gcc extensions that are slowly being removed from gcc, extensions that were not documented. Also c++ compile time is a hard thing to fix if you want a full c++ compiler in a short period of time. 3.3 is very stable compiler, even 3.4 in the cvs is a stable compiler. The gcc team are all volunteers so why do you not help them and fix some problems, and/or report some problems to us (I am slowing helping out now).
They cannot sue them again, the suite against the BSD's between then AT&T and BSDco was settled out of court (by that time Novell took over UNIX) and the code was removed and also they agreed to not sue BSD any more. SCO took over UNIX from Novell. The rest is history as we know it.
The GUI of Windows 95 looks like the GUI of the NeXT OS by NeXT (aka Apple now), which is what Mac OS X is derived from.
Sounds like OpenDoc from Apple, IBM, and Novell, which failed because of Novell not doing the Windows port fast enough. Apple had their version for Mac OS, remember the Web Browser before Safari by Apple. IBM had their port of OS/2 done also. Even Microsoft was on board for the Mac version with Office for OpenDoc on the way.
Actually it was settled out of court aka Apple won.
If you do not have it set to UTF-8, then there is a problem with your browser since it is the standard for i8n (sp?).
é (aka option-e e).
à (aka option-` `).
î (aka option-i i).
use key caps (in utilities) for more information (hold down option).
Note this was the same as mac OS 7-9.
Apple made up till 7.0 (or was it 7.5) all their OS for free, then they made it free up till 7.6.1.