I know this guy, its actually a rented home, and no insurance. So the house isn't his problem, but just trying to get the smoke outta everything is. He wants suggestions and the thought maybe he might get luckly on the begging part too. He was VERY suprised that this got posted at all, but I guess getting smoke outta stuff may be something everyone should know.
Yea, my credit union does fun things to, (currently trying to fid another) If I use my debit card for 5 things in 1 day, and the last one causes it to go negative they charge you a 30 dollar fee for each of those.
The point is, that if UMG found a song being traded on gnutella, and examined it, they could theoretically (if they applied the watermarks well enough) find out who leaked it. So of course you can put it on your ipod, you can even load mp3s of it to your friends, but you'd have to trust your friends not to share them. Of course UMG is likly not going to bust most, but they definatly will bust someone who is a mass trader.
Well they do have a good point, that RF is not compatible with the GPL. From there most slashdotters would form their own opinions, but I take that compatiblity part to be fact and not opinion, so this is important.
Zion Audio pronunciation of zion ( P ) Pronunciation Key (zn) also Sion (sn) n.
1.
1. The historic land of Israel as a symbol of the Jewish people.
2. The Jewish people; Israel.
2. A place or religious community regarded as sacredly devoted to God.
3. An idealized, harmonious community; utopia.
This is windows XP (and higher) only. Windows XP already comes with a VNC client server setup that works quite nicely. I can log in as any user and it operates at pretty decent speeds. Just wish multiple logons were possible. Either way, this is what they are using I'm sure. Infact if you bought a tablet PC with wifi you could probably do this right now, but hopefully as these will be dedicated towards VNC they will be significantly cheaper.
Its not clear exactly which is being blocked though. Extended Stay America is a hotel (or motel or whatever). The question I have is, is extended stay blocking its guest who are connecting to the internet while in the hotel from using gator. As long as this fact is disclosed to the guest it sounds resonable. The other question, is if they are blocking gator from working on peoples computers who are just visiting their website from elsewhere. Its simply not obvious which is happening honestly.
Your computer contacts your ISPs DNS server asking where www.slashdot.org is. That computer if it knows the answer (which it often does as it keeps stores request for a few hours) Tells you the answer, if it doesn't or it only knows the partial answer (it might know the DNS server for slashdot.org in which it would go straight there and ask where www.slashdot.org is. Anyways your ISPs DNs server will assuming it didn't know the answer and immediently tell you, do one of two things, depending upon how its programmed, very small isps or most company intranet DNS servers, will ask its ISPs DNS server. Or assuming its a normal ISP with randomly pick one of X number of servers. (by my list, (not updated sence 1997) 14 different servers A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET to M.ROOT-SERVERS.NET) Of course the IP address of these servers are more important than the names. This server tells me that slashdot.org's domain name records are stored at ns1.osdn.com (and ns2 and ns3 as backups) and gives these ip addresses of ns1.osdn.org and the backups, then tells my local dns to keep this info on hand for just short of 2 days. My DNs server then asks ns1.osdn.org just where I can find www.slashdot.org, this server will answer me.
HEHE my father is a retired locksmith, that was his general advice to anyone who stated that their car was frequently broken into and or stolen. The responce was always in the line of that they were too good for a cheap looking car.
Assuming how difficult it is doubles with every bit you add (how it generally works) It only needs to double 54 times, 15714 days =~ 43 years we will have the power to be able to compute this in the same 4 year time frame. Of course the funny thing is that if we start right now, using only current tech throughout the entire project it would obviously take about 216 years, and if we used progresivly better technology we'd probably only beat the team that started 43 years from now by a few months, but I personally don't care to try to do the math for that now.
Almost all sightes are "geared" towards IE, but most of these luckly use generic enough code that it doesn't break on IE only browsers. And some even test on other browsers. But 99% of sites are made for IE first, then some of them are fixed to work on other browser.
Sorry I didn't but he was referring to the type that was a monitor and tracked the eyes, sending a unique image to each eye. In such a method it would be virutally impossible to have multiple viewers. Obviously the artice was taking about holograms on general which could potentially have mutliple viewers if done using a different method.
Believe it or not many people have that kinda hardware. And several people got their hands on the beta. So no I don't find it unlikly that its either, just an average person, or someone lying. Or a bit of both.
Well how about in the case of the warcraft3 beta. I thought it rocked hardcore. But they kept changing it and tweaking it to make it more and more like old warcraft, (selling to the masses and all) And eventually I hated it an never bought it. Is it fair to say that I stole from them?
I don't think they are actually teflon coated, I read something somewhere about pants covered in microscopic hairs that repell liquids. But I'm not positive that is what the dockers are. Anyways
Basically it boiles down to the fact that mallicious users sending false data would completly destroy this project. In Seti, if some mallicious user sends a I have found ET packet, it can easily be checked and confermed (which I believe is automated even) same with all the other distributed systems so far, a user sending back important info is rare enough that it can be checked. While in weather predictions each user will probably be solving a piece of a puzzle so each users will be sending back significant amounts of info not just occasiall rare users. So each user can't be checked. So the checking mechanism has to be done client side, a virtual impossibility if you ask me.
If its all internal, or inside a different encypted channel. Especially if there is a need for very high speed, no reason to slow it down, even if slightly, if the encryption isn't needed.
I know this guy, its actually a rented home, and no insurance. So the house isn't his problem, but just trying to get the smoke outta everything is. He wants suggestions and the thought maybe he might get luckly on the begging part too. He was VERY suprised that this got posted at all, but I guess getting smoke outta stuff may be something everyone should know.
Yea, my credit union does fun things to, (currently trying to fid another) If I use my debit card for 5 things in 1 day, and the last one causes it to go negative they charge you a 30 dollar fee for each of those.
The point is, that if UMG found a song being traded on gnutella, and examined it, they could theoretically (if they applied the watermarks well enough) find out who leaked it. So of course you can put it on your ipod, you can even load mp3s of it to your friends, but you'd have to trust your friends not to share them. Of course UMG is likly not going to bust most, but they definatly will bust someone who is a mass trader.
Well they do have a good point, that RF is not compatible with the GPL. From there most slashdotters would form their own opinions, but I take that compatiblity part to be fact and not opinion, so this is important.
HU? You mean we have to wait till 2095 for linux chicago? DAMN!
Zion Audio pronunciation of zion ( P ) Pronunciation Key (zn) also Sion (sn)
n.
1.
1. The historic land of Israel as a symbol of the Jewish people.
2. The Jewish people; Israel.
2. A place or religious community regarded as sacredly devoted to God.
3. An idealized, harmonious community; utopia.
But honestly, it may not be called VNC, but it produces the same effect and fits the basic definition.
Well Free Market does include government to set rules fairly and enforce them fairly. The problem is, that simply isn't happening.
This is windows XP (and higher) only. Windows XP already comes with a VNC client server setup that works quite nicely. I can log in as any user and it operates at pretty decent speeds. Just wish multiple logons were possible. Either way, this is what they are using I'm sure. Infact if you bought a tablet PC with wifi you could probably do this right now, but hopefully as these will be dedicated towards VNC they will be significantly cheaper.
No just that walnut creek is holy thats all. (Why is it that walnut creek has a very old internet history, but I still don't know where it is?)
yes, wc3.org
walnut creek church of christ
Its not clear exactly which is being blocked though. Extended Stay America is a hotel (or motel or whatever). The question I have is, is extended stay blocking its guest who are connecting to the internet while in the hotel from using gator. As long as this fact is disclosed to the guest it sounds resonable. The other question, is if they are blocking gator from working on peoples computers who are just visiting their website from elsewhere. Its simply not obvious which is happening honestly.
Competly wrong.
Here is how it actually works.
Your computer contacts your ISPs DNS server asking where www.slashdot.org is. That computer if it knows the answer (which it often does as it keeps stores request for a few hours) Tells you the answer, if it doesn't or it only knows the partial answer (it might know the DNS server for slashdot.org in which it would go straight there and ask where www.slashdot.org is. Anyways your ISPs DNs server will assuming it didn't know the answer and immediently tell you, do one of two things, depending upon how its programmed, very small isps or most company intranet DNS servers, will ask its ISPs DNS server. Or assuming its a normal ISP with randomly pick one of X number of servers. (by my list, (not updated sence 1997) 14 different servers A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET to M.ROOT-SERVERS.NET) Of course the IP address of these servers are more important than the names. This server tells me that slashdot.org's domain name records are stored at ns1.osdn.com (and ns2 and ns3 as backups) and gives these ip addresses of ns1.osdn.org and the backups, then tells my local dns to keep this info on hand for just short of 2 days. My DNs server then asks ns1.osdn.org just where I can find www.slashdot.org, this server will answer me.
HEHE my father is a retired locksmith, that was his general advice to anyone who stated that their car was frequently broken into and or stolen. The responce was always in the line of that they were too good for a cheap looking car.
Assuming how difficult it is doubles with every bit you add (how it generally works) It only needs to double 54 times, 15714 days =~ 43 years we will have the power to be able to compute this in the same 4 year time frame. Of course the funny thing is that if we start right now, using only current tech throughout the entire project it would obviously take about 216 years, and if we used progresivly better technology we'd probably only beat the team that started 43 years from now by a few months, but I personally don't care to try to do the math for that now.
Well in America SSN plus a picture ID is generally the accepted ID, though this guy would need a way to confirm SSNs which I doupt he has.
Almost all sightes are "geared" towards IE, but most of these luckly use generic enough code that it doesn't break on IE only browsers. And some even test on other browsers. But 99% of sites are made for IE first, then some of them are fixed to work on other browser.
Sorry I didn't but he was referring to the type that was a monitor and tracked the eyes, sending a unique image to each eye. In such a method it would be virutally impossible to have multiple viewers. Obviously the artice was taking about holograms on general which could potentially have mutliple viewers if done using a different method.
as how is it going to handle multiple people
It can't, its that simpele. This is not for presentation to others.
Hmm nice program, but most of the decent hubs expect you to have 15-30 GB shared (and can check for this) Damn a bit high expectations.
Believe it or not many people have that kinda hardware. And several people got their hands on the beta. So no I don't find it unlikly that its either, just an average person, or someone lying. Or a bit of both.
Well how about in the case of the warcraft3 beta. I thought it rocked hardcore. But they kept changing it and tweaking it to make it more and more like old warcraft, (selling to the masses and all) And eventually I hated it an never bought it. Is it fair to say that I stole from them?
I don't think they are actually teflon coated, I read something somewhere about pants covered in microscopic hairs that repell liquids. But I'm not positive that is what the dockers are. Anyways
Basically it boiles down to the fact that mallicious users sending false data would completly destroy this project. In Seti, if some mallicious user sends a I have found ET packet, it can easily be checked and confermed (which I believe is automated even) same with all the other distributed systems so far, a user sending back important info is rare enough that it can be checked. While in weather predictions each user will probably be solving a piece of a puzzle so each users will be sending back significant amounts of info not just occasiall rare users. So each user can't be checked. So the checking mechanism has to be done client side, a virtual impossibility if you ask me.
If its all internal, or inside a different encypted channel. Especially if there is a need for very high speed, no reason to slow it down, even if slightly, if the encryption isn't needed.