Slashdot Mirror


Doom 3 Alpha Leaked

Alex_Ionescu writes "The Doom 3 E3 Demo Alpha has leaked to the public. It looks promising, altough I'm only getting 12FPS on a Radeon 7500. Did anyone else have the chance to play it and could post their FPS? Here are some sites with more information and screenshots: here , here, here, and finally here. "

628 comments

  1. what do you mean by leaked? by IoQuaTiX · · Score: 5, Interesting

    is this a 'bad' leak? or was it done on purpose or what?

    1. Re:what do you mean by leaked? by Magila · · Score: 5, Informative

      It was most definatly not on purpose. It is the demo that was shown at e3 and it most likely was leaked by someone at ATI. Id seems to have gone the silent route with it, they will probably never publicly discuss this incident.

    2. Re:what do you mean by leaked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, signs are pointing to AMD, not ATI or NVidia.

      http://www.rage3d.com/board/showthread.php?s=f9e be 7e44ec6784f09b1c5c5694b1dcb&threadid=33645384&perp age=30&pagenumber=2

    3. Re:what do you mean by leaked? by CoolVibe · · Score: 2

      Nothing yet on the idsoftware finger servers... I'm curious to see the reactions of JohnC et al. in their .plan files.

    4. Re:what do you mean by leaked? by HellKrisp · · Score: 1

      You might be interested in this log someone managed to find.

    5. Re:what do you mean by leaked? by einer · · Score: 4, Informative

      The leak wasn't a very serious leak, despite the Drudge Report's alarmist headline, which reads "The most anticipated game in history: Doom III by ID Software has been compromised after an Alpha version was leaked... " [The link on their page actually points to this thread.]

      Basically, an alpha version containing 3 levels, got out. This is far from the whole game, and the game certainly wasn't 'compromised.' Now, on to my point... ;) I think this leak is a 'good' leak that was not done on purpose. It serves as a great demo and is certainly no more harmful than the full blown warezed copies that are sure to follow.

    6. Re:what do you mean by leaked? by octalc0de · · Score: 1

      Please use a working link:

      and the guy that said that has been known to bullshit on that forum, so people are doubting him.

    7. Re:what do you mean by leaked? by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 2

      Its verry harmful.
      This is unoptimized pre-release code. it isnt intended to be used or judged upon, but there will be many who download it and get crappy FPS and just think the game sucks. Thats why it was shown at e3 -- it was a closed enviroment, so they knew it would work fine.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    8. Re:what do you mean by leaked? by skybuck · · Score: 0

      I tried playing doom III on pentium III 450 MHZ and a TNT2 32 MB video card :)

      I got 2 to 4 FPS not bad for such an old system :)

      The graphics looked crap though with black lines here and there but it still gave a good impression :)

      And the sound was repeating itself etc...

      In short unplayable but still fun to see it :)

    9. Re:what do you mean by leaked? by Hardwaregeeks · · Score: 1

      I saw some doom 3 screenies here http://www.hardwaregeeks.com/board/showthread.php? s=&threadid=2513

    10. Re:what do you mean by leaked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i have the leaked version. i get 60 fps when it's static but only 5fps when firing at monsters. i have a P4 2.4GHZ with 1024MB DDR PC 2700 Ram and an ATI 8500LE 128MB graphics card.
      It is primitive but good

    11. Re:what do you mean by leaked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Preyyt Much this leaks just lets everyone know ID can make a good game but everone will have to upgrade there pcs to play it maybe they will give a free stick of rdram with this game

  2. SWEET!!!! by tadheckaman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This looks really nice... but will there be any hardware avalible that can play it?
    *ducks*

    --
    My potato gun was confiscated by the United Nations. They said I wasn't allowed to have weapons of mash destruction.
    1. Re:SWEET!!!! by furballphat · · Score: 3, Funny

      What do you think distributed computing is for?

    2. Re:SWEET!!!! by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 2, Informative

      A while ago I emailed Carmack and asked him what current hardware would play it (Doom 3) at a good rate. (My idea was 1024x768x32 @ 85Hz more than 30FPS). His response was that there was currently no hardware in existance (and this was just before E3) that would play Doom 3 at the specs I mentioned and that they were shooting for an 800x600 stock resolution. So, basically, if you do not have top of the line hardware when Doom 3 comes out, you are in big trouble if you want to run this at a good rez and speed.

      Moral: save your money kids, you'll be getting those 3Ghz P4s soon (along with the NV30 or Radeon 9700).

    3. Re:SWEET!!!! by packeteer · · Score: 2

      I dont see this as a bad thing. Personally i dont plan on buying Doom 3 immediatly after it comes out anyway. The game will only get better as there is a need for more power. Imagine being able to do see honestly better graphics and framerates that change the experiance years after it comes out. The best part is it probably wont be a BAD game at 20 fps.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    4. Re:SWEET!!!! by DetrimentalFiend · · Score: 1

      It may seem obvious, but Quake 3 was the same way. When it first came out, nothing ran it well at all. Within a year, decent frame-rates were possible even with higher quality levels. Now Quake 3 is just like Quake 2 when Quake 3 first came out: any hardware on the market can run it at the highest detail level with no problems at all. John C. does this very much on purpose for two reasons. One: he can. And because he can, he makes games that look better, which increases his reputation, which makes it so that he can push the envelope even more. Two: hardware manufacturers love him (for obvious reasons) and make his job easier. I would also guess that leading the industry was fun for a while too (though I wonder if he's grown tired of it). At any rate, EVERYTHING id has ever done pushed technology to the limit, so I'm not quite sure why anyone is surprised.

    5. Re:SWEET!!!! by Murdock037 · · Score: 2

      You're right on-- and beyond all that, it improves the game's shelf life.

      When the game is first released, only the enthusiasts are going to be able to run it well. But, say, a year later, your average consumer-level Dell system is going to be sporting the card that the enthusiasts were using a year ago. Id wants their games to last long enough to ensure that the company always has a presence on the shelves between games.

      Making the engine work on today's mid-level graphics cards would leave you with graphics that will look dated before long. And those developers that pay $250,000 for an id engine for a game that'll be out in six months don't want to look like everybody else.

    6. Re:SWEET!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "At any rate, EVERYTHING id has ever done pushed technology to the limit, so I'm not quite sure why anyone is surprised. "

      I'm not so sure that is true about Commander keen ;)

    7. Re:SWEET!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apparently, you never played that in its original EGA glory on my 8086 with a math-coprocessor installed. :)

      push left, wait, wait, Keen moves. Keen falls on spikes. Restart.

  3. 150FPS on ASCII White by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This computer truly is a monster

    1. Re:150FPS on ASCII White by packeteer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actualyl i doubt ASCII White could go over 50 fps. Doom 3 requires video card power NOT CPU/RAM bandwidth. Super computers are mad for crunching large numbers quickly but are not designed for real-time creation of frames for a game. Maybe if you had one machine with a Radeon 9K it would work but even tthen still probably not because the latency to get the calculations back from the other comps would be too much.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    2. Re:150FPS on ASCII White by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Doom 3 requires video card power NOT CPU/RAM bandwidth.

      Um, so what's the point of having an AGP video card? Well, you've already proven that you don't know the answer so I'll just correct you. You do need RAM bandwidth. An AGP card can access RAM contents directly so you need the RAM bandwidth.

      Alas, if you stopped playing games you might pick up on a little of this technical knowledge.

    3. Re:150FPS on ASCII White by packeteer · · Score: 2

      So your AGP card in one node can directly access the RAM fo computers across the network? WTF r u talking about. Your thinking of the 1x/2x/4x/8x measurement. What that tells us is the amount fo bandwidth the the system ram. And if you look at some benchmarks its not as big of a factor as internal RAMDAC. I dont play games i code them in OpenGL. Maybe if you would do more than skim Tom's and Anand you could find this stuff out.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    4. Re:150FPS on ASCII White by jericho4.0 · · Score: 2
      IIRC, ASCII White and other uber-machines have a flat memory model, and data is just shuffled real fast behind the scenes. So, in effect, your card can access memory on other machines.

      In reality though, one node would have more than enough RAM to hold all the scene info, RAM that could be written to by many nodes, freeing your disply node to simply render. You're right though, I'll take a faster RAMDAC over AGP 16x anytime (for the next few years at least).

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    5. Re:150FPS on ASCII White by packeteer · · Score: 2

      Im not saying you cant get it to run on ASCII White computers. I dont know if you can or not but i woudl believe it if someone did. I am saying that you would recieve no benefit from running it on the single node and no single node can get 150 fps on Doom 3.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    6. Re:150FPS on ASCII White by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      Not sure, but I'm sure that could work. I just don't know if it's been coded yet. Why, though, do you want such a faster RAMDAC? That lets you play at higher resolutions with higher color. It has nothing to do with speed. Take a 9700 and halve it's RAMDAC, if I remember how this works correctly, then both would render an 800x600 scene at the same framerate. It just means the original (IE the one with full speed RAMDAC) can display this info at higher res. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but that's how I understand it, since a RAMDAC is only needed for CRT monitors, not digital ones.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    7. Re:150FPS on ASCII White by Whyrph · · Score: 1

      Um, so what's the point of having an AGP video card? There is no point. AGP is shittacularly unneccessary. It probably won't be really used effectively until they develop multiple-AGP slot motherboards and start using it for RAM drives.

    8. Re:150FPS on ASCII White by jericho4.0 · · Score: 2

      You appear to be correct (Random Access Memory Digital-to-Analog Converter). I guess I meant faster RAM and faster clockspeeds as compared to faster system-to-card bandwidth.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    9. Re:150FPS on ASCII White by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut the hell up !

    10. Re:150FPS on ASCII White by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actualyl i doubt ASCII White could go over 50 fps

      That's ASCI White, genius.

    11. Re:150FPS on ASCII White by Have+Blue · · Score: 3, Informative

      What Doom 3 really requires is what 3D cards give it: Very, very fast basic operations like matrix multiply and floating-point table interpolation, memory fast enough to move the textures and various color, Z, stencil, etc buffers around, the relatively simple shader execution engine, and a bit of general-purpose CPU for running the game logic and GL control code.

      ASCI White is good at none of those things. It is a massively parallel computer designed for tasks that require very large amounts of general-purpose CPU. Running a single program thread on a single node is not very impressive; running a few thousand threads on all of its nodes at once makes it the fastest computer in the world.

      I suppose that if someone bothered to make a version of Doom 3 that replicated itself across all of White's processors, rendered 3072 16x16 tiles at once, and recombined them into a 1024x768 frame, it would run pretty fast. But there still probably wouldn't be enough memory bandwidth between the nodes to run much faster than a decent desktop CPU connected to a Radeon 9700 over AGP 8x.

    12. Re:150FPS on ASCII White by castlan · · Score: 2

      *ahem*

      ASCI Blue Mountain would likely do the trick.

      If I had 3 phase power handy, I'd take a handful of post Infinite Reality pipelines over an ATI/nVidia anyday. Now as for fitting that onto my desk.... hrmmm....

      maybe it would fit into a CAVE.

  4. The Matrix by dknj · · Score: 1

    Wow a screenshot of the cvarlist

    -dk

  5. Slashdot... by Chester+K · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...News for Nerds, 0-Day Warez!

    --

    NO CARRIER
    1. Re:Slashdot... by Cyn · · Score: 0

      actually it's at least 1-day.

      sorry to burst your bubble

      --
      cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
    2. Re:Slashdot... by isorox · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...News for Nerds, 0-Day Warez!

      Nah, more like: News for Nerds, 3-Day Warez

    3. Re:Slashdot... by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      7-14d dupe warez.

      seriously though, i'd like to see isonews/nforce news on the frontpage.. that would be handy

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Slashdot... by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 0, Funny

      Well, if you're sorry that you burst his bubble, why did you?

      What is it about good jokes that makes insecure people like yourself feel the need to retalliate with bubble bursting? Can't you accept the fact that someone else said something clever?

      Did you just want to be the first slashbot to point that out? Does it somehow validate you to get that oh-so coveted +1, Informative? You, sir, are a loser. A complete and utter loser. I pity you and your family.

      You may want to look into seppuku as a means of avoiding further dishonor.

      Thank you for your time, and have a pleasant day.

      Your Lord and Saviour,
      SweetAndSourJesus

      --

      --
      the strongest word is still the word "free"
    5. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if it's a leak of an alpha, wouldn't that make it -1 day warez? :)

    6. Re:Slashdot... by Brandeissansoo · · Score: 1

      I guess I'm not up to date, what exactly is the difference?

    7. Re:Slashdot... by Espressoman · · Score: 2

      Yes Slashdot, what the heck!? This is theft, plain and simple. What are you doing linking to this stolen software? Get a fricking clue!

    8. Re:Slashdot... by timeOday · · Score: 2

      What link?

    9. Re:Slashdot... by Tokerat · · Score: 2

      Actually Doom 3 isn't released yet. 0-Day = before release date. Sorry to burst your bubble.

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    10. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not selling it. They're not marketing it. They haven't lost anything.

      It's not theft.

      Besides, where's the link you think is theft? Hmm?

    11. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What... this one? Doom III

    12. Re:Slashdot... by azaroth42 · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...News for Nerds, 0-Day Warez!

      Nah, more like: News for Nerds, 3-Day Warez


      Nah, more like: News for Nerds, 3-Day Warez, 5-Day Warez and 8-Day Warez.
      with all those repeat stories...

      --Azaroth

    13. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have P4 GF Ti 4600 and 1 gig of rambus1066 D3 ran good for me

  6. Oh my god. by pommaq · · Score: 1

    The second site actually has the alpha up for download. Someone's in for a HEFTY bill, methinks.

    1. Re:Oh my god. by Bobulusman · · Score: 1
      Looks like it's already been taken down, judging by the message I get on all the links:
      Lehekülge ei leitud !

      Palun kontrolli sisestatud aadressi (URLi) õigsust.

      Tee endale kodulehekülg Hotis ja osale kaks korda aastas korraldataval kodulehekülgede konkursil !

      Registreeri kasutajaks
      --
      Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
  7. Check it for spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The preview of UT2003 I saw came with a nice piece of spyware that tracked everything burned to CDR and then periodically emailed that info to an address on the net. Best check out D3 to make sure.

    1. Re:Check it for spyware by Satanboy · · Score: 1

      when I got it, we ran norton 2002 with latest patches on it, we got no viruses, of course I did not get it off any of the slashdot links, I got it on friday through usenet

  8. Leaked by ATI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    According to this site, the demo was leaked by an ATI employee.

    Shame on them...

    1. Re:Leaked by ATI? by phoebe · · Score: 1
      correction:

      According to this site site, the demo was leaked by a former ATI employee.

    2. Re:Leaked by ATI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can they prosecute him?

  9. QUAID by D4Vr4nt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Start the reactor!

    Um.. Crap, I can't play it, I only have a Matrox G400. :P

    Maybe they leaked the alpha on purpose because they knew practically no one can play it. Well unless of course you just stare at the ground the entire game.

    Looks really cool though, do we get a chainsaw again?

    --
    R4NT.com - A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices.
    1. Re:QUAID by batkiwi · · Score: 2

      It's going to require a HW T&L card (like ut2k3 and bf1942 and others).

      That means geforce1 or higher, or radeon or higher. Nothing by matrox before the para-whatsit has T&L AFAIK.

    2. Re:QUAID by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Informative

      it's pretty playable(as what comes to speed) .. and very non-dukenukemware. that is, it looks like they'll get it done quite fast. and it's scary as fuck.

      besides, part of the horror of the doom1 was for me that when too many moonsters came i couldnt possibly shoot em all because my comp slowed down

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:QUAID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is a chainsaw in the alpha. give weapon_chainsaw give the player what appears to be the chainfist thingy from Q3, but it has no sound or animation and bizarrely see through. Also present are the plasma gun (give weapon_plasmagun) and rocket launcher (give weapon_rocketlauncher) from Q3. It runs fine on any recent machine i.e. Athlon XP or P4 with Geforce 3 or 4 or Radeon. There are some frame rate issues, but then it is an alpha.

    4. Re:QUAID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the parent post strike anyone else as having a bit of inside knowledge? "Athlon XP or P4 with Geforce 3 or 4 or Radeon" -- How many people do you know that A) have access to Doom 3 and B) have access to that kind of equipment and C) have had time to test Doom3 on it. Fess up Carmack, we know it was you. :)

    5. Re:QUAID by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      How did you get around that slowdown? I still can't finish doom 1 until i can get this thing to stop lagging when it sees a monster. :(

    6. Re:QUAID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it could just have been me with my Athlon XP and Geforce 4 with the leaked alpha.

    7. Re:QUAID by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not many people have that kinda hardware. And several people got their hands on the beta. So no I don't find it unlikly that its either, just an average person, or someone lying. Or a bit of both.

    8. Re:QUAID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe their newest card was the Matrox Paraplegic. Bask in their overhyped disability processing power.

      Or it could be called Parhelia. But the first one is funnier.

    9. Re:QUAID by Satanboy · · Score: 1

      yep, actually me and my buddies got to check it out on a radion 9700, geforce 4 ti 4200, 4400 and a 4600

      all the systems were running athlon XPs 1600 - 2400 +s
      I unfortunately have a celery 1.2 oced to 1.4 and a geforce 4 ti 4200 oced to 4400 specs

      it did actually work though, and runs decent considering.

      so yes lots of folks have this kind of hardware, in fact ALL of my friends do

      I can't wait til this comes out, I wanna buy my copy NOWWWW :-)

    10. Re:QUAID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh? I play UT2k3 [demo] quite happily with my TNT2M64. Mind you, I have an XP1800+ to take up the slack. :P

      Unfortunately the OpenGL renderer requires texture compression, which means no Linux UT2k3 for me until I upgrade...

      -MD (only mildly curious)

  10. Pretty old, really... by sailor420 · · Score: 1

    This happened earlier this week. I have had it on my machine for several days now.

    1. Re:Pretty old, really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good job guy!

    2. Re:Pretty old, really... by Moofie · · Score: 1, Funny

      And that means...what? That you have a really big penis?

      Methinks not.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    3. Re:Pretty old, really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, aren't you fucking special.

    4. Re:Pretty old, really... by moonbender · · Score: 2

      No, it just means that Slashdot took a really long time reporting this. Even some German news site I visit to get up-to-date information about ISPs listed the story earlier. Oh well.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    5. Re:Pretty old, really... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Again, so what? I'm pretty sure that there were at least one or two people who hadn't heard about this, until they read about it on Slashdot. How exactly does it hurt you that /. posts it? Or are you one of those people who think things are cool only if you know about them, and everybody else is in the dark?

      In other words, what EXACTLY motivated you to share with the universe that you had this a few days ago? Why do you think anybody cares? Or were you just being an ass?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    6. Re:Pretty old, really... by moonbender · · Score: 2

      Me? I didn't share anything with anyone, I'm a different person than the original poster. :)

      But anyway, the point is probably that Slashdot is supposed to be fast about posting news, and that in this case it was quite slow. That doesn't hurt anybody per se, it does "hurt" people who rely on Slashdot as their only source of "News for Nerds", or at least if would if this was some kind of highly relevant story.
      I don't really see why you're making such a big thing out of it, nobody ever said the fact that Slashdot isn't always the first site ro report things was some kind of earth shattering insight. *shrug*

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    7. Re:Pretty old, really... by Moofie · · Score: 1, Troll

      If I didn't know it, and I read it, it's news. Just because it's not news to YOU doesn't make a damn bit of difference to anybody who's NOT YOU.

      The obsessoin with scooping the competition is a legacy feature of print journalism, and to my mind, a very detrimental one. /. is not designed to be just a news site...it's also a place to DISCUSS news. That means, in order to have a discussion, they have to post the story. If that /. post happens a few days after the story breaks, you STILL get the utility of the discussion.

      So /. isn't always first with the story. What difference does that make? How does that decrease /.'s utility? I mean, I read a lot of poeple pissing and moaning about how bad this site sucks...But those same people are still reading, so obviously the site is doing something right.

      As far as why I'm making such a big thing about it, this thread just tripped on my pet peeve, so I ranted about it. That's what happens around here.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    8. Re:Pretty old, really... by invader_allan · · Score: 1

      Wow, your dick is huge. I only got it fri night. I don't feel like a man anymore

    9. Re:Pretty old, really... by moonbender · · Score: 2
      What difference does that make? How does that decrease /.'s utility?
      Neither me nor the original poster said it did. Your definition of news is only one of several, by the way, I wouldn't say the stuff I learn in tomorrows lecture on hardware design is news, although it'll probably be news to me. On the other hand, this story about Doom 3 wasn't new to me, but it's still a news story even to me.
      Anyway, I do like to know about stuff as early as possible, which is one of the reasons why I visit Slashdot. The other being I enjoy (sometimes) the discussion of news stories on Slashdot. At the same time I realise Slashdot makes a poor single source of news, among lots of other things because it's not always very fast to report stuff. If speed isn't of any importance to you, that's your prerogative, of course, but I doubt it really isn't.

      Note that I don't see the whole issue with the kind of ... fervor ... you apparently do.
      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    10. Re:Pretty old, really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CAN I BEE UR FRIEND!£$E>?

    11. Re:Pretty old, really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was new, so I'd like to thank the original poster for informing me that it wasn't the case. I think that you should grow up.

    12. Re:Pretty old, really... by nomadic · · Score: 2

      If I didn't know it, and I read it, it's news. Just because it's not news to YOU doesn't make a damn bit of difference to anybody who's NOT YOU.

      Nonsense.

    13. Re:Pretty old, really... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Your rhetoric is nothing short of dazzling.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    14. Re:Pretty old, really... by nomadic · · Score: 2

      Your rhetoric is nothing short of dazzling.

      Thank you.

    15. Re:Pretty old, really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Wow. I bow to your silly sailor schlong.

  11. I got a copy by Aztek · · Score: 5, Informative

    I got a copy from other places and trust me you guys arnt missing much. When id says 'alpha' they mean it.

    --
    AZTEK
    1. Re:I got a copy by junkgrep · · Score: 2

      Does this guy have an automatic +5 bonus, or did actualy human beings really mod this up as "informative?" A one line post that says exactly nothing of any interest to anyone other than anthropologists interested in the video-game opinions of the ancient Aztec peoples?

  12. download it hete by Squeezer · · Score: 0, Informative

    go to http://dcplusplus.sorgeforge.net and download it and then use it to connect to wes.homelinux.com. Search for doomiii.rar

    --
    Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
    1. Re:download it hete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the tip, downloading as we speak.

    2. Re:download it hete by _Spirit · · Score: 2

      LOL

      U getting a % on the bandwidth sold to these guys ?

      --

      beauty is only a light switch away

    3. Re:download it hete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:download it hete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      linux RUkES!

    5. Re:download it hete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well to those peeps that complain about doom3 alpha not being available.. its a direct connect client, there is a hub for sure where doom3 alpha is shared by someone, look around.

      what i dont get is.. direct connect is a windows programm, why make a open source client for windows again, i mean this is slashdot.. its supposed to be a gtk/console/gpl`ed client.
      booh, mod parent down :p

    6. Re:download it hete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it is a tool for juarez d00ds and no one else gives a fuck?

    7. Re:download it hete by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Hmm nice program, but most of the decent hubs expect you to have 15-30 GB shared (and can check for this) Damn a bit high expectations.

    8. Re:download it hete by unixbob · · Score: 1

      quoted from the chat room on wes.homelinux.com

      squeezer is gay and was lying.. its not on this hub
      One of your guys?
      used to be
      banned him cause he's ghey


      rotflmao

      --
      The Romans didn't find algebra very challenging, because X was always 10
  13. You have to love ad placement by Speedy8 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if this story has anything to do with the ad at the top of it for a Radeon 9700...

    1. Re:You have to love ad placement by aussersterne · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why is this modded as funny? It's insightful and informative, if anything.

      It's also so obvious as to be unseemly, even for Slashdot.

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    2. Re:You have to love ad placement by damiam · · Score: 1

      When will people realize that slashdot ads (including the MS Visual Studio ads) are completely random, not fixed to any one story, and have nothing to do with the content? If such an ad is shown for this story it is pure coincidence.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    3. Re:You have to love ad placement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some coincidence i have to say.. i've reloaded the page 3 times.. and even on this reply.. THE RADEON 9700 BEYOND GRAPHICS..
      so what? does it make coffee too? sing?

      shame on slashdot. i think this shite was leaked on purpose. the old "talk about anything, most importantly, about me.".

    4. Re:You have to love ad placement by Kupek · · Score: 2

      Troll? WTF?

    5. Re:You have to love ad placement by ActiveSX · · Score: 1

      Well, there are targeted ads on Slashdot now. Look at the "Ad: PriceCompare" link in the "Related Links" box. It's linked to whatever section of PriceGrabber.com is relevant to the current story. In this case, for example, it's games.

    6. Re:You have to love ad placement by kaworu-sama · · Score: 1

      Actually, there IS product placement in these demos! On level 2, if you go in the room with the computers, you'll see Coca-Cola(tm) cans on the desk. Two of them I believe. I wonder if The Master is getting paid for this? *goes back to pining away at for a full version*

  14. Re:FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree. What's the point of giving us a really pretty survival horror on mars video game? Take away the 'on mars' and what have you got? Resident Evil for the Gamecube.

    This is a fascinating study in what can be done with pixel shaders etc. but I want some good old-fashioned gameplay with my eye candy, please.

  15. newsgroup downloads by MoceanWorker · · Score: 4, Informative

    for those who don't want to bother with the mirror site and just download from newsgroups..

    alt.binaries.games.worms is offering the Doom III Alpha copy..

    there will be plenty of reposts.. so take your time :-)

    --


    "The ones who dont do anything are always the ones who try to pull you down" -- Henry Rollins
    1. Re:newsgroup downloads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damnit. It was going slow to begin with, then fucking slashdot finds out about it. Couldn't you have waited til after I was done downloading? :)

    2. Re:newsgroup downloads by Phasedshift · · Score: 1

      Heh.

      Its always great when we have posts that directly support software piracy.. NOT.

      The worst part is, as far as I know there isn't even a semi-convincing moral argument for pirating Id software's games. Id Software has (in the past) released a demo, or a test version of the software previous to release of their retail product, so you can 'try before you buy'. In addition, they have 'given' past releases (doom, quake, quake 2..)'s source code to the public. There are very few major commercial gaming software companies who do this, and I think this earns Id a lot of respect.

      Sure, there are probably some people out there who will warez the alpha version of doom 3, and then go out and buy it, but its probably going to give quite a few the wrong impression of the game, as it is quite an early version of it.

      Anyway, I hope the ATI employee who leaked the game (if thats infact true) gets fired. I also hope that most people on slashdot don't go out and pirate the game, and simply wait for Id's 'test' or demo release.

    3. Re:newsgroup downloads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah because copyright law is so fair and just these days. Bullshit.

    4. Re:newsgroup downloads by shird · · Score: 2

      Its my understanding the leaked alpha version is the demo. So really its just a pre-release of something which is going to be free to download anyway. So theres not much harm done, other than the usual problems of people running beta software.

      --
      I.O.U One Sig.
    5. Re:newsgroup downloads by kaworu-sama · · Score: 1

      Really, most of the people who are hardcore id fans enough to go out and get this game (or resist it enough and keep themselves chaste until mid next year) are the ones who are probably gonna end up buying the game (excluding the 3% of people who are just plain warez monkeys :)

    6. Re:newsgroup downloads by junkgrep · · Score: 2

      Funny how people will "understand" anything that justifies their desires.

    7. Re:newsgroup downloads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how people will whine about anything just to make themselves feel important.

    8. Re:newsgroup downloads by Moloch666 · · Score: 1

      I would have to disagree. This leaked copy may seem somewhat unethical to download, since the developers may not want to be in the publics hands yet. But as the previous post stated, this is really a pre-release to a freely downloadable demo that will be released soon. The people that are downloading this are the ones that have been drooling over the screen shots, and plan on pre-ordering as soon as it is possible. They will probably end up downloading the demo on top of that. I really see no harm done. Yes you got your warez kiddies that brag about having 1 Terabyte of Moviez, ISOz, Virii[sic], they download everything and anything.

      --
      Understanding is a three-edged sword. -- Kosh Naranek
  16. Adds. by tomcio.s · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Hmm, strange, the only add I see is for the Radeon9700...
    How convinient.

  17. My FPS... by sailor420 · · Score: 5, Informative

    My machine is a p4 2.4 w/ a 64mb Radeon 8500. I have 512 megs DDR. Running at 800x600, medium detail, with bumpmapping enable, I am averaging around 20-25 FPS.

    Try killing any and all non essential processes running in the background. Also, try killing and multiple monitors (just unclick the "extend my desktop...", you dont have to pull other cards out).

    1. Re:My FPS... by Espectr0 · · Score: 2

      right click on the game icon and properties, then disable visual themes. 10 frames more. woot

    2. Re:My FPS... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Good gods.. what hardware does it take to hit a really smooth framerate?

      Hey, since you've got it running, a question: can you bind the WinKeys as control keys?

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  18. FPS by whiteguy013 · · Score: 1

    My friend has a GeForce4 4200 and he only got 12 fps no matter what resolution he used.

    1. Re:FPS by malevolence · · Score: 1

      I get around 20 - 25 fps. The more ram you have, the better it seems to run. It will occaisonally drop down to very low frame rates (5 fps). Especially when you are getting mauled by an imp =). I've had a few crashes, mostly from missing models or when I try to launch the editor's.

      Specs: Athlon 1700+, 768 MB ram, ti4200, Win2k

    2. Re:FPS by Emexies · · Score: 1

      If you are going to be a bad person, you should at least do it quietly, without confessing in full view of anyone/everyone.

      So, to recap the moral of the story: Don't do bad things, unless you know you won't get caught.

    3. Re:FPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you made it even easier for people who wanted to know who malevolence was. You must be a riot at parties. Do you advertise on the street when people are smoking weed there? Can I be your friend?

    4. Re:FPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... So dl'ing an ALPHA COPY OF A FUCKING VIDEO GAME IS GOING TO EARN YOU JAIL TIME. Get real. Any judge would throw it out of court. "Yes Sir, we arrested this man for illegally playing video games." Judge: "Let's lock him up and throw away the key."

      Nobody CARES! NOBODY! If you think that copied versions of software is bad, just visit a college dorm. TO TOP IT OFF, NOBODY GIVES A SHIT BECAUSE THE COPS ARE TOO BUSY CATCHING THE REAL CROOKS WHO ARE JACKING YOUR CAR, AND ID IS PROBABLY TOO BUSY MAKING THE FRICKING GAME TO ACTIVELY PURSUE A LEGAL CASE AGAINST JOE BLO IN FUCKING IDAHO WHICH IS A WASTE OF TIME AND MONEY BECAUSE IT WON'T ACCOMPLISH A SINGLE FUCKING THING, BECAUSE THERE ARE 10,000,000 MORE PEOPLE JUST LIKE HIM!

      Sheesh.

  19. Re:FP by LordKaT · · Score: 5, Insightful
    How the heck can you complain about poor FPS on a leaked program that is only in its Alpha stages?

    Some fo you /.ers make no sence at all.

    --LordKaT

  20. Re:download it here by Squeezer · · Score: 2, Informative

    I should add that that is where I read it could be downloaded. I haven't tried it for myself.

    --
    Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
  21. It's Too Bad by MBCook · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I don't like these software "leaks". They mess things up, IMHO. Let's take this program for example (I'll point out I haven't played it, I have a GeForce 2 Go and I'm not a masochist).

    One possibility of what will happen is what seems common to me when things are leaked. People play it, and they like/dislike a certain feature. Then when it's taken out/changed, they complain, when they never would have seen it (or missed it) otherwise. When people get to play something like this, they seem to think that it's their game.

    Another possibility is that people play it and think it's the best game ever (and when it changes, complain, as above). If this doesn't happen, then the other extreme does, and that one seems a bit common to me. People play it, it's got lots of problems (it's an internal alpha, what do you expect) and so they say it's terrible, etc when the work on it is no where near complete. So when it DOES come out, alot of these people have already made up their minds.

    I do think that this is news, and I'm glad it made it onto slashdot, but I DON'T think that slashdot should be posting mirrors to the leaked alpha (I know they'd show up in the comments but still...)

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:It's Too Bad by isorox · · Score: 5, Funny

      I DON'T think that slashdot should be posting mirrors to the leaked alpha

      iD was worried about the leak, so they submitted to slashdot to stop people downloading. If a server cant take a 50kb page being slashdotted, what about an xxxMB file?

    2. Re:It's Too Bad by MBCook · · Score: 2

      Never thought about that. "Son, you must only use the Slashdot effect for good, never for evil. You may also use it on friday nights as long as you fill up the gas tank and bring it back in one piece." Oh wait.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    3. Re:It's Too Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      note that this applies equally to any sort of leaked product (including windows).

    4. Re:It's Too Bad by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Well how about in the case of the warcraft3 beta. I thought it rocked hardcore. But they kept changing it and tweaking it to make it more and more like old warcraft, (selling to the masses and all) And eventually I hated it an never bought it. Is it fair to say that I stole from them?

    5. Re:It's Too Bad by miscellaneous_havoc · · Score: 1

      LOL... All I will say is that I agree, totally. Well, time to get on my file sharing program to find some... MP3's...

      --

      -----
      Make Love not [Browser] War!
    6. Re:It's Too Bad by bernardos70 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the people smart enough to find the demo know perfectly well it isn't complete, optimized, finalized. So don't freak out. There's some stuff that I don't like on this demo, like the control scheme, yet I know I'll be able to change it when the game comes out. If anything, this leak just made me want to buy the game even more when it comes out.

    7. Re:It's Too Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh don't worry only the hard core fans will download it, and there gonna be the ones cueing up on the street on launch day to get there copy :)

    8. Re:It's Too Bad by Animixer · · Score: 1
      I'll point out I haven't played it, I have a GeForce 2 Go and I'm not a masochist.

      I am. In case anyone's interested, the framerate on a pII 233mhz/256mb 60ns sdram/TnT-1 approaches zero.

      --
      man tunefs | grep fish
    9. Re:It's Too Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to be picky, but more of an fyi, there isn't and never was a capital D in id. They usually have their logo both lowercase as in "id".

  22. And in other news.. by wahgnube · · Score: 5, Funny

    And in other news (TOTALLY UNRELATED) today, sales of high end Nvidia and ATI cards goes up by 1000%.

  23. No! It's a fake! by thisisatest · · Score: 0, Troll

    Look at those screenshots -

    The antialiasing is all wrong.
    In two screenshots, it says Doom III Alpha. In the rest it says Doom III Codename Alpha. Who calls 'alpha' a code name?
    There are obvious photoshop artifacts all over the place.

    Anyway, ID's got to be one of the companies the least worried about leaked alphas at this moment, since the only people who can run it are the weirdos who buy $400 video cards every four months, suggesting that they have the cash to happily buy the game when it comes out.. Not like all those warez kiddies who photoshop screenshots on the computers their parents buy for them.

    --
    You'd almost think a 'net company would know
    1. Re:No! It's a fake! by sailor420 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No! It's a fake!

      Except I have it on my machine, and was playing it earlier...

      the only people who can run it are the weirdos who buy $400 video cards every four months

      I can run it up to 40 FPS on my radeon 8500 if I drop all the detail and resolution. At 800x600, on medium detail with bump mapping enabled, I am getting 20-25. Not good, but playable.

    2. Re:No! It's a fake! by Guspaz · · Score: 2

      If it's so fake, could you kindly explain to me why I have a copy of it on my hard-drive and have played it? If it's fake, what was I experiencing when I was trying it out? Was my brain put into some sort of hallucination?

      Get it through your obviously thick skull; if so many people have it (myself included), then it's obviously not fake.

    3. Re:No! It's a fake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody ever said that a gamer was a rocket scientist, did they?

      20-25 fps is playable?

      I'm sorry, I'd rather play the older version even if its speed makes my reaction time look glacial.

    4. Re:No! It's a fake! by thisisatest · · Score: 1

      Dear sir:

      You are a fucking moron.

      A conclusive study which surveyed roughly seven people by asking them to read my post followed by your own, revealed that 100% of the survey sample believe that you are a pathetic numbskull in dire need of a clue.

      While I am willing to cut you some slack - you are obviously a gaming monomaniac who would benefit greatly by devoting five minutes of each day to personal hygiene - you seriously need to develop your reading comprehension skills. Speaking as a Canadian, you (and the terrible spelling featured prominently in your posting history) do our nation a disservice. By being a gamer, you also do your parents' wallet a disservice, but we shall set that aside as a granted point, as you did not contest it in the post to which I am replying.

      While I am not entirely sure how, some time ago, an AC determined that you were rejected from McGill, the possibility is quite shocking to me - I had you pegged as a pimply-faced fourteen year old. I suppose that there do exist pimply-faced eighteeen year olds as well, but they've generally learned (from experience) better than to expose their idiocy, that is to say 'thoughtlessly posting the first thing that comes to mind' under their primary aliases.

      In any event, to forestall any further misapprehension on your part, I shall now answer your questions in the order you asked them.

      • You have a copy of it on your hard drive because you are a warez kiddy.
      • You have played said copy because you have nothing better to do with your time than play an alpha-quality game at less than a third of the speed which most people consider the lower bound of playable.
      • If it were fake, you would be experiencing the same sort of delusion you harbour when you tell yourself that you won't be a virgin forever.
        • However, I did not for an instant believe it was fake.
        • This does not make your virginity any less of a permanent problem.
      • What were you experiencing at the time? You no doubt were fighting the lingering effects of your latest experience with the 'demon weed' which is oh-so-close to being legalised.
        • If you weren't a pothead, you wouldn't have had your university application rejected.

      Get it through your head, my friend - masturbating to porn movies on your computer (See parent's DivX expertise here, here, and here) all day is not good for you. Get a job, you hoser.

      --
      You'd almost think a 'net company would know
    5. Re:No! It's a fake! by Guspaz · · Score: 2

      Maybe I can clear up a few points and refute some others.

      1) I also don't know how the AC came up with that idea, since I never applied to McGill. I applied to John Abbott College and was accepted.

      2) I do make spelling mistakes, but I doubt they are as frequent as you seem to think they are, nor do I care as I don't really think they matter in such an environment.

      3) I puchased my computer and all games myself using money I earned myself. I fail to see how my choice of entertainment is a burden on my parent since I pay for it myself.

      Now for some responses to your questions:

      1) I have a copy on my hard drive because I am interested in new technology in 3D gaming. I care little about the game or how fast it runs at this point, in fact it is certainly much worse than simply unplayable on my machine. This would also probably explain why I actively follow Tenebrae's progress even though I find Quake 1 quite boring.

      2) See response #1

      3) You obviously thought it was a fake, you even tried to justify your conclusion with dubious claims. Denying it after you're proven wrong is just lame.

      4) Yes, I do suppose I'd have to be on some kind of hallucinogen to experience such things, though I aluded to that in my original post.

      As for my interest in DivX, I am quite interested in video compression technology. I try to keep up with the latest new developments, and my primary use of DivX is to do the occasional encode, for example I'm set up to encode a short-film bein produced by a friend. However, I must admit that, lacking a DVD player, DivX is certainly handy for storing copies of movies that I enjoy. I've even been known to purchase the odd DVD to have someone encode it for me, though I really ought to buy a DVD drive. As for a job, I currently have one, but being a full time student I don't work more than a few hours a week. It does produce some spending money however. It mostly provides funds to purchase new hardware and games, as I stated above.

      You sir, are a flamer. But I'll give you this; you write an excellent flame, certainly much better than I am capable of, and I got quite a laugh from reading your post. Keep up the good work.

  24. for the future by Scaebor · · Score: 1

    my fps was incredibly slow even with my g4 4400, and didn't really even approach the 12 fps stated in the post. This leak is really good for the graphics card makers, as the slow play rate lends itself nicely to buying a new graphics card to make this highly anticipated game playable. Obviously they will improve performance later on in production, but things still don't look promising for my current system...

    --
    "Hey brother Christian with your high and mighty errand / your actions speak so loud I can't hear a word you're saying"
    1. Re:for the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the rest of your system is rather underperforming?! (CPU, RAM, BUS SPEED, BIOS options etc)

  25. I played it last night by crovax · · Score: 1

    I have a GF4 MX on a duron 800 and I was getting 7 FPS. looked as good as the hype though.

  26. Plz dont be like other gaming websites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Nuke every thread w/o warning

    1. Re:Plz dont be like other gaming websites by MeenMunky · · Score: 1

      ironic that there is a link to their forums in the article

  27. my fps by prell · · Score: 1

    Im running a gf3 on an athlon 950 with 384mb of ram (non-ddr), and I'd estimate I got about 5-10fps max.. once the motion blur starts, that number drops considerably, to probably about 2-3. It's almost as if its software rendering. This is the e3 demo, which was compiled, at the latest, about 5 months ago. So who knows where it is now.

    From the videos I've seen, and from what I've played, it just seems like doom with pretty graphics, which isn't very interesting at all. These are just demos, however, and what's really in the game could be hidden.

    Incidentally.. I didnt check for a cfg file for the controls, but here are the defaults:

    a: backward
    s: strafe left
    d: strafe right
    mouse secondary: forward
    mouse primary : fire weapon
    mouse scroll : weapon change

    1. Re:my fps by malevolence · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can rebind the keys with standard quake 3 commands. Try this:

      bind w _forward
      bind s _back
      bind a _moveleft
      bind d _moveright

      There's also a flashlight in the game that is missing a texture. You can copy flashlight2.tga to flashlight3.tga and it will work. Framerate drops significantly when you use it.

      bind e flashlight

    2. Re:my fps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it just seems like doom with pretty graphics, which isn't very interesting at all.

      You're insane... that's what I've been wanting since the possibility of a DOOM 3 being developed was announced. Then I find out they are using the same story with just more detail as the first DOOM that's even better! All hail the DOOM with pretty graphics!

    3. Re:my fps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those aren't the default bindings, if you look at the various cfg files laying around in your doom\system dir you'd see those are Tim Willits key bindings.

  28. Re:FP by martyn+s · · Score: 1

    Umm, resident evil for the gamecube? Sorry, pre-rendered backgrounds don't count. Next you'll be saying that Myst has the greatest graphics ever.

  29. leaked on purpose? by thopo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    since this alpha seems to be heavily optimized for the R300 aka ATI9700 (or more precisely: not optimized AT ALL for any other card) it might have been leaked on purpose so the FramesPerSecond-Whores (hello Kyle Bennett) out there run to the shops to get theit 9700 to play the shiny new Doom3.

    or maybe it was leaked just in time for the NV30 to demonstrate that it does kick the 9700's butt in Doom3. sure it was leaked by an ATI employee?

    --
    keep it simple.
    1. Re:leaked on purpose? by saldek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since they only planned to use the alpha for a few demonstrations at E3, it's not really surprising that they optimized it to run as fast as possible on their test setup only.

    2. Re:leaked on purpose? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The doomconfig.cfg file includes special flags for the NV20/25 and NV30 series and the Parhelia but not the Radeon family. There's also a flag to use OpenGL 2.0 which is possilby a reference to Creative/3D Labs's P10 chip. The 9700 is the only card it doesn't seem to have optmizations for.

    3. Re:leaked on purpose? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seems to be heavily optimized for the R300 aka ATI9700

      Ironic that at the top of this story there happens to be an ad for this very same card. ATI is taking a *big* chance, if id decides to shoot back by not supporting the card, or worse not supporting any ATI cards for their next generation of products ATI will burn for this. And don't tell me this was an accident, these sorts of things don't happen by accident unless people are careless.

    4. Re:leaked on purpose? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      give me a break.. it's an alpha, of course it's not optimized. And do you really expect older cards to perform in the same league as the 9700?

  30. get this out on ptp by paradesign · · Score: 1, Troll

    this is what peer to peer is for, get it of of the news groups and out on limewire and kazaa. please, or give me a good link to what to DL

    --
    I want 2D games back.
    1. Re:get this out on ptp by magnum3065 · · Score: 1

      Try eDonkey if you're serious about P2P. Not as good for music, but much better for pretty much everything else. Sites like Sharereactor catalogue links to good downloads like Doom3: http://www.sharereactor.com/release.php?id=2946

      Personally I'd recommend the eMule client ( http://www.emule-project.net ) for eDonkey though, rather than the normal one.

  31. toilets in the game by npongratz · · Score: 5, Funny

    http://www.thegameclans.com/doom3pics/high%20res/s hot0054.jpg

    Do those urinals have CAMERAS strategically attached to them????? Creepy...

    1. Re:toilets in the game by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      Do those urinals have CAMERAS strategically attached to them????? Creepy...

      Well yeah, for security, duh! I mean, look at the teeth on that thing...

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    2. Re:toilets in the game by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      I wonder if there will be a "George Michael" key that you can press while in the toilets

    3. Re:toilets in the game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think those are motion detectors that signal the urinal to flush when you move away, a la airports. Maybe they even work in the game! Yay!

  32. Re:FP by slashdot_bites · · Score: 1

    I believe the problem was with the fact that gameplay is the exact same as say, resident evil. Missed the point didnt u. Basically, people are just fed up with eye candy for the sake of eye candy only. See, most eye candy games do NOT have great gameplay now do they? They simply "look" good...

    To use an old cliché, she aint pretty, she just looks that way.

  33. Surprised by Richard5mith · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised that Slashdot are posting links to places with information about this, reporting it is one thing, pointing people to places they can probably get it is another.

    Saying that though, I did get it yesterday. 30fps easy when walking around, drops to 1 or 2 when in any kind of firefight. But even though it's unoptimised, uncomplete and even contains a bug that stopped id from showing it at full quality during E3 - it's fabulous. I look forward to plonking down my £35 as soon as it's available next year for real.

    1. Re:Surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New vocabulary word for the day: Hypocrisy.

      See above for textbook definition.

    2. Re:Surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why dont you stop your crying

  34. Um... by Have+Blue · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Has anyone noticed that the links in this article are ILLEGAL? And not just controversial, civil-disobedience, megacoprs-bought-the-law-to-oppress-us "illegal", but violation-of-NDA and warez-illegal? I thought at least the Slashdot editors were smarter and more ethical than this.

    1. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ethics is as ethics does.

      Information to the people!

      Down with the US!

      Give me my doom.

    2. Re:Um... by fintler · · Score: 1

      So I guess that means the link from google to k5 to slashdot to the alpha is also "illegal". That makes every page that links to google "illegal". Do you really think anyone cares?

    3. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel that this can only boost hype, and thus sales. I'm not worryingabout it, in the same way that I don't worry when I go 71mph on the motorway. Nobody's losing anything.

    4. Re:Um... by inkswamp · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Has anyone noticed that the links in this article are ILLEGAL?

      I don't totally agree with your point, but I do agree that it is very poor judgment on the part of Slashdot's editors to post those links. Linking to leaked software is very close to linking to warez, IMO.

      I wonder if the same thing would have been done with a leaked pre-release version of Photoshop or MS Office? Probably not.

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    5. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I know, slashdot NEVER SIGNED AN NDA. So how could they possibly be in violation of it? Second of all, the fact that slashdot reported on what happened doesn't constitute any wrong dueing. Slashdot never actively linked to leaked doom3 file(s). If Slashdot provided the downloads themselves, that's one thing, but they didn't.

      "If it could be, it would. But as it isn't, it aint. That's logic."

    6. Re:Um... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Uh, call me nutty, but I don't remember signing an NDA. So...what's the problem again?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:Um... by Sludge · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      I agree. I don't know why in hell slashdot/cmdrtaco would post this. If slashdot got slapped for pulling this stunt, I wouldn't feel one bit of remorse, nor would I support any sort of defense.

      This shows a serious lack of respect. For the first time, my opinion of slashdot/taco has dropped severely.

    8. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. This isn't a complete software, it's a three level demo
      2. Slashdot didn't post any links to the files.

    9. Re:Um... by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 5, Funny

      This shows a serious lack of respect. For the first time, my opinion of slashdot/taco has dropped severely.

      So... you're new here, then?

      --

      I write in my journal
    10. Re:Um... by Sludge · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I'm the one with the four digit user id.

    11. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet you still can't get a date? Jeez, what is the world coming to. You're probably not letting the ladies know about your Slasdot 4 digit user id, are you? You really should get right on that.

    12. Re:Um... by mseeger · · Score: 2
      I thought at least the Slashdot editors were smarter and more ethical than this.

      Removing those links would not serve any usefull purpose but would set an indecent precedent. Anyone able to handle eDonkey or relatives already finds the file in plenty. But i think, postings with links to it should be moderated down not up.

      Yours, Martin

    13. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Linking to leaked software is very close to linking to warez, IMO.

      Close? I have one question: Has the copyright holder given anyone permission to distribute this piece of software? If not, this exactly the same thing as linking to warez. Sure you can argue it doesn't hurt Id as much as 0-day isoz, but it doesn't make it any more legal.

    14. Re:Um... by jcsehak · · Score: 2

      Linking to leaked software is very close to linking to warez, IMO.

      Yeah, why should I buy the full version of Doom III now, when I have a bug-ridden alpha demo that runs at a crappy frame rate?

      The big difference here is that linking to warez theoretically hurts sales of the software. No sane person could believe that this does.

      --

      c-hack.com |
    15. Re:Um... by BlowChunx · · Score: 1

      Okay.... NUTTY!

      There, for some reason I felt compelled.

    16. Re:Um... by drakkinor · · Score: 1

      Well, I wouldn't call it illegal really. They aren't making you dowload and play the leaked file, that's really up to you. They don't mention that they support it. They're just reporting that it happened in the intrest of news. And besdies, they don't have an NDA about anouncing that the leak happened do they? I think anyone reading /. who has interest in that sort of thing probably would have found out about it anyway regardless of /. saying anything about it. Just my 2 cents. If I'm completely wrong, just say so.

    17. Re:Um... by MechCow · · Score: 1
      The big difference here is that linking to warez theoretically hurts sales of the software. No sane person could believe that this does.
      The issue is that it is taking away from their control over their IP. Id should be able to release their product under the circumstances they see appropriate. This biases consumers in a way that they have no control over.

      I never show people half finished versions of anything I work on and Id should have the same right. Slashdot should mention this because it is news but let the links appear in the comments only.

      --

      --
      On Slashdot I'm a lawyer.
    18. Re:Um... by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 2

      Nope, this is free advertising, it will benefit Id. The touch of the forbidden will arouse even more interest. Things like this will push the hype, people will talk about it with their friends, at work, etc. Even the last hermit in northern Alaska will have heard about this game by the time it gets out. IMHO it was leaked intentionally.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    19. Re:Um... by jericho4.0 · · Score: 2
      First you get modded 'redundant' for posting your opinion. Then you get modded 'troll' for pointing out that, no, in fact you've been here longer than any of us.

      Keep on keeping on man, and send Taco an email telling him to get rid of the negitive mods.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    20. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMHO it was leaked intentionally.

      No, you're completely wrong. The leak-guy was trying to give everyone a copy of DoomBunnIIIes, and got his CD's mixed up. Could happen to anyone.

    21. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, maybe this is just me, but it seems that saying "get-it-while-it's-hot" may be a bit more than just reporting the news.

      I don't think this is illegal, but it is clearly unethical. If Jon Carmack decided to use his .plan file to tell people where to go for nude pictures of CmdrTaco's wife, that would also be legal but unethical. Of course, Carmack at least is a respectable fellow. CmdrTaco... well, let's just say his sense of judgement has become rather questionable lately.

    22. Re:Um... by HohlerMann · · Score: 1

      1. This isn't a complete software, it's a three level alpha demo.
      2. Slashdot didn't post any links to the files, they only stated that they were available.

    23. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps because his original comment *is* redundant. There are quite a few other posts complaining about the same thing. "/. shouldn't be linking this!"

      While the troll moderation for the second post may be seen as unfair to some, what does having a 4 digit user ID have to do with anything? Someone has been a member of slashdot longer? Nice. That doesn't mean you're smarter than the newest user.

      In my opinion, flaunting that you are high and mighty because you have a low UID *is* in fact trolling.

    24. Re:Um... by jericho4.0 · · Score: 2
      Because it was in response to 'you're new here', of course.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    25. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about illegal, but posting a direct link to leaked software (especially software as lucrative as Doom) is incredibly irresponsible. Although I'm aware of Slashdot, I'm not computer literate enough to be a regular reader. I got here from a link from the Drudge Report. If I just sauntered in here from one of the most popular sites on the Internet, this leak is reaching more than just the elite who know what all the parts that are being bragged about actually do. Aside from doing damage to id, you guys are opening yourselves up to all kinds of trouble from mainstream media and from lawyers who would love to file a suit on behalf of anybody who feels that their intellectual property rights are being violated.

    26. Re:Um... by |<amikaze · · Score: 3, Interesting

      violation-of-NDA and warez-illegal

      OK, so what NDA did CmdrTaco et al sign that prevents them from spreading this around? What EULA did they agree to? They aren't breaking a contract, since they didn't SIGN a contract.

    27. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So since when did you choose what people are allowed to say?

    28. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "IP" is an evil capitalist construction. Down with the capitalists! Down with the US!

    29. Re:Um... by inkswamp · · Score: 2
      Nope, this is free advertising, it will benefit Id.

      The only way this would be a justification (and barely one at that) is if id actually needed the free advertising. Is there any gamer on the planet who doesn't already know about Doom 3 in one form or another? I doubt it.

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    30. Re:Um... by inkswamp · · Score: 3, Insightful
      From a couple different posts:

      Yeah, why should I buy the full version of Doom III now, when I have a bug-ridden alpha demo that runs at a crappy frame rate?

      1. This isn't a complete software, it's a three level demo

      Oh I see. So stealing someone's work and distributing on the Internet is okay as long as it's not completely functional. I know Slashdot is really heavily slanted toward the open source/free software crowd, but one shouldn't take lightly the fact that this is someone's property and work and that it was distributed without that person's permission. In this case, one of those people is John Carmack, someone whose work has given me countless hours of fun, so it seems slightly worse to me. I don't see any justification for stealing his work and distributing it before he says it's time. I find it even worse that Slashdot editors (who supposedly run a place filled with those who understand and respect this kind of work) don't see the problem with pointing its readership toward this stuff.

      Justify your own lack of ethics however you see fit, but I think it's wrong to distribute it as well as point others in the direction of it. Slashdot is wrong to have done so and should be embarrassed.

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    31. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, since the inception of the user moderated forum?

    32. Re:Um... by maelstrom · · Score: 2

      yawn.

      --
      The more you know, the less you understand.
    33. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not illegal or irresponsible. Most of my geek friends already had it installed and deleted before slashdot even made the post. If it were the finished game I could see how some people might be pissed, but this is just a small teaser that hardly even runs. What's the big deal? Lighten up yall. peace.

    34. Re:Um... by poMONKey · · Score: 1

      I heard about the leaked version of doom3 from newsgroups. NOT SLASHDOT. I KNEW this would be leaked months and months ago. I have 2 leaked versions of UT2003. I found that by searching newsgroups. NOT THROUGH SLASHDOT. I went out and bought the game the fuggin day it came out. Bought it with money!!!! ITS A FUGGIN ALPHA OF A GAME THAT WONT COME OUT FOR A YEAR OR SO.... IT HAS 3 LEVELS. ITS NOT DONE YET. Most of people dont even have a computer that can handle this yet. I, along with most other people on the PLANET, will BUY this game as soon as it becomes available. THERE ARE NO "ETHICS" TO LINKING TO A LEAKED ALPHA RELEASE OF ANYTHING!!! Why not play the sh*t out of these chunky, 3 FPS doom3 leaks until they finish the whole thing. Then you can WHINE about all the evil doers that habitate warez sites....

  35. 12 FPS??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm getting about 60-80FPS on 1600x1200.

    Ohhhhhh, I forgot to mention that I'm using an GForce 5 18500MX that leaked off some guy after I had hit him on the head with steel pipe last night.

  36. Re:FP by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 5, Funny

    What? Run. Run. Run. Shoot. Shoot. Shoot. Shoot. Kill. Kill. Grab ammo. Grab ammo. Change weapons. Shoot. Shoot. Feel Asshole go from O to . after going down a dark and lonely hall way to find a million imps waiting on the other side.

    This isn't good gameplay?

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  37. Possible reaction posted by id software ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Possible reaction posted by id software:

    Xian> ATI leaked it
    Xian> oh we will. We are hoping our rep gets fired.
    Xian> John sent them a flame mail yesterday basically saying "This has hurt our relationship"
    Xian> haha, no
    Xian> not really
    Xian> they sent us a development laptop with a full build of Unreal Warfare on it
    Xian> yep
    Xian> Well, we deleted it
    Xian> that's a whole can of worms we don't want to get into
    Xian> yeah, well, ATI has clearly violated our NDA
    Xian> we thought about that.
    Xian> but, no
    Xian> ATI is on our shitlist righ tnow
    Xian> we are not dealing with them until further notice
    Xian> no, it's not public chiQ
    Xian> We know ATI leaked it. We watermark all releases
    Xian> Squiggle: ATI has a relaxed policy about pre-release software. Remeber, they ave us a laptop that had Unreal Warfare loaded on it 3 months ago
    Xian> They don't seem to care about strict enforcement of NDA's
    Xian> on a positive note, people seem to *REALLY LIKE* the leaked shit

    posted anon cos i dont need stinkin karma
    s(TM)

    1. Re:Possible reaction posted by id software ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possible? How boring! Where's the real reaction?

  38. that irc log is fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    This was faked

    1. Re:that irc log is fake by grammar+fascist · · Score: 2

      The parent post was faked.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
  39. Re:FP by LordKaT · · Score: 1
    No, actually, you missed my point, which was: You are complaining about a game that is in it's alpha stages.

    Plus, the poster I replied to made no mention of resident evil, so Im willing to bet your dumbass replied to the wrong post. "Didn't u?"

    Fucking 'tard.

    --LordKaT

  40. Don't bother unless you have a top end system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh and you seriously need about 1Gb of ram. Even if you have a normal system with 512MB you'll get to watch your page file hit the 1GB mark. I personally think your better off waiting for the a real demo, but I hardly think that's going to disuade anyone from downloading it.

  41. or via P2P download on Ed2K network by jdkane · · Score: 1
    For those of you using EDonkey2000 or Overnet P2P clients, the Doom III demo is widely available on the ED2K network. Here's a good download point with info.

    Failing that, the more direct approach is to copy and paste the following links into your edonkey or overnet client's console (aka message) window:
    dllink ed2k://|file|doom3.e3-demo.README.ShareReactor.txt |302|01c39f4c97aae55beab8f9517aed8740|
    (.. for the README instruction file)
    and
    dllink ed2k://|file|doom3.e3-demo.ShareReactor.rar|381781 972|1d67104ded376842d34827573abcdc64|
    (.. for the actual EXE demo for PC).

    The demo file is in RAR format. You will need the WinRAR utility installed to decompress it. The download is a trial version that is time-limited, but it will work for you.

  42. Possible response from iD by zaffir · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Taken from HTGK, no word on it's validity, but still interesting:

    "Xian> ATI leaked it
    Xian> oh we will. We are hoping our rep gets fired.
    Xian> John sent them a flame mail yesterday basically saying "This has hurt our relationship"
    Xian> haha, no
    Xian> not really
    Xian> they sent us a development laptop with a full build of Unreal Warfare on it
    Xian> yep
    Xian> Well, we deleted it
    Xian> that's a whole can of worms we don't want to get into
    Xian> yeah, well, ATI has clearly violated our NDA
    Xian> we thought about that.
    Xian> but, no
    Xian> ATI is on our shitlist right now
    Xian> we are not dealing with them until further notice
    Xian> no, it's not public chiQ
    Xian> We know ATI leaked it. We watermark all releases
    Xian> Squiggle: ATI has a relaxed policy about pre-release software. Remeber, they gave us a laptop that had Unreal Warfare loaded on it 3 months ago
    Xian> They don't seem to care about strict enforcement of NDA's
    Xian> on a positive note, people seem to *REALLY LIKE* the leaked shit"

    --
    "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    1. Re:Possible response from iD by Daleks · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Xian> They don't seem to care about strict enforcement of NDA's

      ATI does seem to habitually violate NDA, or at least confidentiality agreements. A year ago at MWNY ATI made a press release about how their new graphics chip would be used in the yet to be released new iMac. This PR came out two days before Steve Jobs was supposed to officially announce the machines. He got so pissed off he cancelled all ATI demonstrations for his keynote speech and even had ATI's built-to-order options removed on all of the new machines. This probably made NVidia very happy.

    2. Re:Possible response from iD by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Funny
      Xian> on a positive note, people seem to *REALLY LIKE* the leaked shit"

      This reminds me of when I was talking about reaganomics and I said "trickle down? trickle down my ass. uh, wait."

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Possible response from iD by Galvatron · · Score: 2

      The reference is here.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    4. Re:Possible response from iD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This wouldn't have anything to do with your slashdot username, would it? :-)

    5. Re:Possible response from iD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to be picky, but more of any fyi, there isn't and never was a capital D in id. Their logo is usually seen with both lowercase letters.

    6. Re:Possible response from iD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, do yourself a favor and find Commander Keen.

      I'm sure Wolf3D and Doom had the same logo, but just to make sure.

      *new school gamers, ugh*

  43. Next generation game engines by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

    The next generation of game engines looks really good. Real light sources with real cast shadow are cool. Bump and specular mapping is cooler. Now if only someone would leak the developer tools for the new engine...

    --
    Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    1. Re:Next generation game engines by malevolence · · Score: 1

      The editor is included in the game executable. Just bring down the console and type: editor. It will try to start the map editor. It crashes for me because there isn't a project file to open, but I haven't looked that hard. There is also a built in sound and light editor.

    2. Re:Next generation game engines by malevolence · · Score: 2, Informative

      I got the editor to work after messing around with it for a bit. I had to use GTKRadient to create an empty project, then I copied the project file into the doom/base/scripts dir. Now it starts up and loads and I can play around with it. Only problem is that it is difficult to edit when your resolution is at 640x480 =(

    3. Re:Next generation game engines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      go into windowed (alt+entre or r_fullscreen 0 then vid_restart to be cool) mode before typing editor in the console.
      why cant people figure this out for themselves.

  44. How? by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    How can a link be illegal? It is just a pointer to information.

    1. Re:How? by NineNine · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're right. A link is a link, right? Maybe I should consider some links to kiddie porn on my site. After all, they'd just be links, right?

      Nope, this is wrong. There's no way Slashdot should be linking to warez.

    2. Re:How? by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Well, considering that your site is more than likely in violation of several Fed/State obscenity laws...

    3. Re:How? by mondoterrifico · · Score: 0

      Its quite funny reading all this moral outrage over linking to something that is freely available over the net. And yes I think you should be able to link to a kiddie porn site if you so choose to. Doesn't mean I have to click it nor look at it.

    4. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, people such as yourself annoy me to no end. "Oh, won't somebody PLEASE think of the children." Kiddie porn and Nazis have been used for decades to argue a poor, tired point. Please be just a tad more original.

    5. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ever here of 6 degrees of separation?

      the idea is that everyone is within 6 people of knowing everyone else in the world.

      is it illegal to link to a site that links to these downloads? what if we add another degree of separation? at what point does it not become illegal?

      i am sure you could find this on google...does this mean google is illegaly linking? i bet many of your site link to google...so then isn't your site also illegal for linking to a site which links to a site which links to a site with illegal content?

    6. Re:How? by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2

      Slashdot did not link to any warez. It is Slashdot's policy that all posts are owned by their posters. Slashdot cannot and should not stop you from posting a link to kiddie porn in your next comment. But, since you own the comment, you might expect a knock on your door if you do.

      A link is a link. Period. It's a shame some judges can't understand that. If you post a link to something on someone else's site, you can't stop them from putting kiddie porn in that location. You would think that a person such as yourself, who's website is what it is would understand that. All it would take for you go to go to jail is one little slip up right? Just post one illegal thing that someone doesn't like and your done.
      BEGIN RANT
      Law about links are idiotic. Yeah you could check every link on your site once every five minutes to make sure they don't point to anything illegal, but that's just stupid.
      This is why the current kiddie porn laws are stupid in the first place. All you need is a little bit of kiddie porn, email it to someone, and call the cops. Them having downloaded those images to their PC even if they put them right in their trash folder is enough to convict them. They still have the images on their pc and tha's all the law requires. It's ridiculous.
      END RANT

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    7. Re:How? by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      The judge's opinion on the whole 2600 thing seemed quite logical to me, even though I was on 2600's side initially. If someone is distributing a link with the intention of distributing copyrighted materials illegally, then they are breaking the law. The issue with HTML and program code is not that it can't be considered speech (and be protected by the first amendment), it's that it isn't just speech: it has a functional role. The fact that its expression does have a functional role means that that functional role can have more stringent rules applied to it.

      They may not be hosting the copyrighted works, but on the Interweb, the act of distribution involves not just hosting, but communicating that address to those seeking it.

      Just because you're quoting a link someone else gave you does not mean you're in the clear here. The Slashdot editors made the conscious decision to make that quote and provide that link to users. If I were to make my own site and just "quote" 2600 and its links to DeCSS software, should I be treated any differently from 2600? That's silly.

    8. Re:How? by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2

      All the computers that data goes through to get to you on the internet have a "functional role" is publishing everything you read. Not a huge one but it's there. It's just my opinion that the buck should stop with the person who is actually hosting the data. Google will give me links to the DeCSS code if I want them, but it would be ridiculous and very bad for the internet to hold them responsible for it. It would as be trivial for me to trick Google into linking to my site when it didn't have the DeCSS code and the adding it after it gets indexed. I could even just block their ip range from accessing that file, so they couldn't tell if they were linking to something illegal or not. You can see how quickly it would become nearly impossible to make sure you were following the law.

      I am also very sad to tell you that different people get treated differently, so chances are you would get a diffrent treatment than 2600 did. You might care to note that this site : http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/DeCSS/Gallery/ is still up.

      As far as intent goes, I don't like the idea of a "thought crime" at all. If the guys at 2600 don't like copyright law, that should be their choice. They have to follow copyright law, but they should be able to speak out against it, as well as point out its idiocy in certain cases.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    9. Re:How? by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      Google will give me links to the DeCSS code if I want them, but it would be ridiculous and very bad for the internet to hold them responsible for it.

      What you have failed to see from my previous post is that intent does matter. Google is a search engine. It indexes what it sees without regard to content. It does not "intend" to facilitate copyright infringement. Those posting DeCSS links, or deliberately compiling links to warez, on the other hand, cannot claim ignorance. They know what they're doing, and this is why the law applies differently to them.

    10. Re:How? by theLOUDroom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree that the intent is different. It's just my opinion that intent shouldn't matter. (obviusly not the judge's in the decss case)
      Take the google example, chances are someone there has though at the fact that their search engine indexes some things that are illegal. one might even be able to find an internal email on the subject. With that email, one could allege that since they know some of the things they index are illegal and didn't do anything about it, they willfully aided copyright infringement. One could make this argument, but I don't think one could win. But it gives and example of why I think intent should not matter.
      I think arguing over intent is silly. It should be either okay to link to something or illegal. Anything else leaves too much ambiguity.
      I understand the state the law is in currently, I just think it's a lousy state to be in.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    11. Re:How? by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      they willfully aided copyright infringement

      This is precisely why intent does and should matter!

      It is up to the prosecution to prove that not only did the user facilitate copyright infringement, but they did so knowing that there was copyright infringement going on. If they did not know that (as in your example), then they are doing nothing wrong!

      This is also why we, in the US, have "Cease and Desist" orders. These are carefully worded letters that are intended to inform parties that they are indeed breaking the law. If someone then ignores this letter and continues in their actions, it can then be argued in court that they did it knowing they were breaking the law. If they respect the letter, and stop what they're doing, the copyright holder (or whatever) has no case against them, unless they want to try and push for damages anyway.

      Intent makes a huge difference, and rightly so.

    12. Re:How? by An+Ominous+Coward · · Score: 2

      So if you're ever charged with manslaughter, do you want them to automatically bump it up to first degree murder because "intent shoudln't matter"?

      Determining intent is not the same as monitoring 'thoughtcrime', and has been a critical part of our legal systems since English common law.

  45. do not buy a geforce 4mx for doom by sfraggle · · Score: 5, Informative

    > I have a GF4 MX on a duron 800 and I was getting 7 FPS

    I'm not surprised. Carmack has already stated that you should not buy a GeForce 4MX for doom.

    --
    were you expecting to see a sig here? perhaps you'd rather see the inside of an ambulance!
    1. Re:do not buy a geforce 4mx for doom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I advocate abstaining from purchasing any video card for the sole reason of playing one game.

    2. Re:do not buy a geforce 4mx for doom by 95_gst_al · · Score: 1
      Personally, I advocate abstaining from purchasing any video card for the sole reason of playing one game.
      It's not just an excuse to buy the new 9700 for just this game. Future games will also need the support of more powerful video cards. It's really more a reason to go out and buy the the card you look at everytime you go into the store. I have picked up that box and read the specs on that card a few times now. There is nothing wrong buying the latest equipment even if the ads are whored around everywhere. I mean people lease cars just to have the latest cars, but they lose all the money they pay in monthly on the lease vehicle that they give up for the next model. It's not like you can't sale your old car to somebody else.
      --
      When all else fails, piss on it. At least you will feel better in some kind of way.
  46. Uh, this is SO wrong by dw3ll · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't believe slashdot posted this. Isn't it considered piracy in the worst form? Now EVERYONE on the planet will be after a copy (as ever 1/2 the world was not after it already). Sucked that JC's labor of love is exposed to the world in such an incomplete state.

    I will get off my moral high horse now and look for a copy :)

    1. Re:Uh, this is SO wrong by R-2-RO · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call it piracy.. Lame yes. Piracy no. Maybe 'technically it is' , but being a raw, far from finished game, people are still going to have to get a hold of the full game when its released, *shrugs*

      --
      Thank you. Drive through. (:wq)
    2. Re:Uh, this is SO wrong by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      more like idSoftware's labor of love. If I remember correctly JC wasn't too fond of the idea when it was originally proposed but then a bunch of the team threatened to leave or something stupid like that to get him to consider it.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    3. Re:Uh, this is SO wrong by EricTheMad · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe John Carmack led the group that threatened to quit. In the end they were able to make the game, but someone was fired in retaliation.

      --
      -- Remember, we're not happy until you're not happy. -- Local FAA Inspector --
    4. Re:Uh, this is SO wrong by plone · · Score: 2

      No, Adrian Carmack was against the idea of making Doom III and Paul Steed was fired in retaliation.

    5. Re:Uh, this is SO wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, see, "piracy" is considered a violent crime committed on or near the ocean.

    6. Re:Uh, this is SO wrong by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2

      Has anyone considered this may have been a "planned leak" to build hype? It gets MUCH more publicity this way than a regular demo release (which will no-doubt follow shortly).

      A leaked release is much more tantilizing and cool to have than a regular demo. Will build hype too.

      I look at it this way - I've already spent $650 (cdn) buying the top of the line graphics card based on their alpha demo. I'm sure as hell going to BUY (yes BUY) the full version when it comes out. I'll pre-order it the second it becomes available (in a store other than EB).

      I can't wait... :)

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    7. Re:Uh, this is SO wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... Ass Piracy would be that committed on the Goat Sea?

  47. Not interested... by NineNine · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I'm not sure if this is some kind of ploy working with various hardware manufacturers, but I ain't falling for it. Any game that's so ridiculously poorly written that you need a $2000 machine to run it on isn't worth getting. Hell, Warcraft 3 runs great on my P 1.2 laptop with who knows what kind of graphics card. Why is this so ridiculously hardware intensive? Hell, a $200 PS2 offers better performance at a fraction of the price.

    1. Re:Not interested... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Fact 1: calculating shadows, bumpmapping etc. is very hardware intensive.
      Fact 2: you're a moron.

    2. Re:Not interested... by Richard5mith · · Score: 1

      "Why is this so ridiculously hardware intensive?"

      Well it's an alpha, it's unoptimised, it's a leak... do you want me to go on?

      And of course there's the fact that it looks better than every single other game either out on the marketplace or coming out in the next 12 months on any platform (that screenshots have been released of anyway). Comparing it to Warcraft 3 seems a bit dumb as well, since the two are very different games with very different engines.

    3. Re:Not interested... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason its so ridiculously hardware intensive is because the engine is a hell of a lot more powerful than any current 3d engines. Its not an evolutionary step, like from quake 2 to quake 3, but a revolutionary step. This engine will be pushing up to 250,000 polygons in one frame. Quake 3 only pushed around 10,000 in a frame. If you don't want to play the game, thats your choice, but it certainly is not fair to compare this to a PS2 game. If you haven't seen the screenshots or movies of this game yet, you should go see what I'm talking about

    4. Re:Not interested... by t0qer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you smokin? Poorly written game? You fucking twit.

      ID *IS* the company that pushes FPS technology to it's fullest. Carmack is a fucking Genius. Unreal is nothing more than a DoomMeToo. Ever since wolfenstien3d (i'm talkin 286 here, not RTCW) People wanting to play ID games have been buying, upgrading their home pc's for years. It's a completely new scene (6-7 year old scene?)

      aS FAR A ps2 being beefier than a top of the line PC, don't make me chuckle. Shit's gonna be emulated soon nuff. NV30 will run circles around the PS2 graphics stuff without even breaking a sweat.

      Your crappy NTSC Tv at the most can display at a resolution of 720x480, while any PC can do resolutions way beyond that. Also to note, your TV refreshes at 60hz, so at the most it could only spit out 60 FPS on a tv.

      Computers with monitors will go beyond the resolution, and beyond the framerate of the PS2. Modern SGI monitors can refresh at 150, so as long as the video card can keep up with the refresh rate, it can spit out 150fps.

      Use "comment sense" before you make stupid comments like that and I wont have to kill you.

    5. Re:Not interested... by Montag2k · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, I always get confused about this frames per second stuff. I have heard that the human eye can only detect things at ~30 frames per second - so why all this push to make things run at 150 fps? Can you really notice the difference above a certain amount? Or is this just the kind of thing that "videophiles" can see but nobody else has a clue?

      That being said, this game looks like it will be amazing.

      -Montag

    6. Re:Not interested... by Ultraken · · Score: 2, Informative
      First, high frame rate improves the responsiveness of the controls. The loop from monitor to eye to brain to hand to mouse to input to simulation to rendering to monitor should be as short as possible. The image on the screen is always just a bit behind--it's just a matter of how much behind. For a fast action game, you want the response to be as close to instantaneous as possible.

      Second, high frame rateproduces a realistic sense of motion. Even though the integration time of your retina isn't particularly fast, higher update rates give an more convincing illusion of continuous time. Movies and television can get away with 24 fps and 60 fps (fields) respectively because the images displayed have motion blur built into them. Games don't have that advantage, so they have to "fill in the gaps" with high frame rate.

      (And yes, I work in the game industry so I know these things. At Activision, the difference between Battlezone running in software at 30 fps versus Battlezone running with hardware acceleration at 60+ fps was astonishing.)

    7. Re:Not interested... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

      > I have heard that the human eye can only detect things at ~30 frames per second
      > - so why all this push to make things run at 150 fps?
      > Can you really notice the difference above a certain amount?

      It's an expontential fall-off.
      Doubling the frame rate does not make the video look twice as smooth.
      i.e.
      10 -> 20, very noticable
      20 -> 40, smooth, but getting hard to tell.
      30 -> 60, you will be hard pressed to notice the difference (but it IS possible)

      That said, there is a reason you want the game to run a high frame rate. If you're game runs at rock-solid 30 fps, and then 12 guys show up on screen tanking your frame rate by 20, you'll really notice the visual lag. However, if you're frame rate is 150+, with the 12 guys on screen, you won't even notice the frame rate decrease.

      Cheers

      --
      Philosophy is a game with objectives but no rules.
      Mathematics is a game with rules but no objectives.

    8. Re:Not interested... by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      PS2 limited to 720x480?

      Uhm. My friend's got an HD TV that can display ATLEAST 1024x768... And hello? HD Component cables for PS2?

      And so what if it can? it's also 4 year old tech that was ment to be mass produced. It's also still relatively untapped. The rendering pipeline was either designed by someone who was a genius, madman, crack head or a combo of the previous three.

      But that aside...

      The consoles also have one up on PCs. Hardware uniformity.

      Let's take Grand Theft Auto 3.

      Runs flawlessly on a PS2.

      I'm required for an upgrade or two to make it work past 640 x 480 and i've got a radeon.

      And it looks just as pretty through my Radeon All-in-wonder's SVideo connection as it does actually being rendered BY my Radeon.

      sure it's not bleeding edge, but atleast it -works-...

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    9. Re:Not interested... by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      Fact 3: idsoftware is the only company with enough balls to actually develop novel technologies in their games
      Fact 4: PS2 is cheap because sony gets supplemental royalties from game sales.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    10. Re:Not interested... by AGTiny · · Score: 1

      PS2 doesn't support HD resolutions. The Xbox does though and some newer games are supporting 720p (1280x720 at 30 or 60fps). I don't believe it can do 1080i (1920x1080) though due to video memory issues.

    11. Re:Not interested... by NineNine · · Score: 1

      You silly, silly little bitch. I didn't say anything about the PS2 being beefier. All I'm saying is that I get games that are just as good for $200 vs a $2000 PC I'd have to buy, and keep buying every 6 months. And, there are only a few companies now that nmake high end graphics cards for PC's. The upgrade curve for this shit makes the Windows upgrade curve look tame by comparison. And for those of us who don't get allowances from mommy and daddy any more, that shit gets real expensive, real fast.

      And as far as FPS, I honestly couldn't care less. Does it look good? Is it fun? I'm not sitting in front of the TV with a fucking strobelight counting framerate. I play games that are fun and look good.

      If you wanna talk about fast games, just go out and buy a few Sun boxes and cluster 'em. I'm sure you could get a 100+ FPS rate. Of course, you'd also have to be an idiot, so.... enjoy your Sun boxes!

    12. Re:Not interested... by ProfanityHead · · Score: 0

      Poorly written? Software in an alpha state and you've already made judgement about the code quality?

      You are an idiot. Make your judgement on the product you get off the store shelf.

    13. Re:Not interested... by ez76 · · Score: 2
      (And yes, I work in the game industry so I know these things. At Activision, the difference between Battlezone running in software at 30 fps versus Battlezone running with hardware acceleration at 60+ fps was astonishing.)
      I'm dying to know what it did for Kaboom!??
    14. Re:Not interested... by Ultraken · · Score: 1
      30 -> 60, you will be hard pressed to notice the difference (but it IS possible)
      I would disagree with this assertion, though it does depend on the application. With any sort of action game, the difference is very noticeable. You can get by with 30... until you see 60. I'm particularly aware of this because the PS2 game I'm working on tends to run at 30 fps in the game shell, but occasionally hits 60. There's such a profound qualitative change that we might have to clamp the rate at 30 to prevent the bursts of 60 from making 30 look bad. :)

      I'd say 60 is the frame rate above which the changes become less obvious, but they're still perceptible as increasing smoothness. If you're talking motion-blurred images, it gets almost impossible to tell, but that doesn't really apply to games yet (you'd be better off hitting your monitor's maximum refresh rate before trying to go that route).

      (Incidentally, I can tell the difference between a 60Hz refresh rate and a 70Hz refresh rate, though between a 70Hz refresh rate and an 80Hz refresh rate. 60Hz seems to flicker for me, especially in my peripheral vision.)

    15. Re:Not interested... by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

      Motion blur is certainly a big part of this. Although even in film there are though that think doubled frame rate is almost as influential as a doubled resolution. IMAX does both, not only is it a huge frame, (70mm sideways, I think that is around 4x the resolution of 35mm, maybe more, I forget) but it also runs at 60fps. Another issue being bandied about is the importance of the space between frames. When you watch a film you are actually staring at a blank frame half the time, your brain films in the blanks to give the illusion of motion. This comes up because digtally projected films are progressivly displayed, there is no blank frame. So there is much talk that this may have a pyschological effect on the perceived realism of film. Of course, this all talk at the moment, but it would be neat if someone experimented with this a little...

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    16. Re:Not interested... by t0qer · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Framerate=life

      Haven't you ever seen the alien pc motto?

      As someone else pointed out, high framerate also makes the controls more responsive. The more responsive you are (epsecially in a FPS like doom) the better your accuracy, everything.

      It doesn't stop at just the responsiveness of the controls either, playing any FPS on a tv over the net blows. I know this from trying CS on my 52" wega via the SVHS out on my video card, and playing halo for the Xbox.

      I guess if you don't really want to take playing doom3, or any other FPS seriously, then yeah, go ahead and play on your crappy little PS2.

      But understand this, I snapped at your initial comment because you talked shit about doom3 like it was garbage code produced by an idiot, and that just wasn't the case. You sound like a man who's jealous of carmack (and who wouldn't be with the fine mamma he has by his side :)

      Your comment lacked comment sense, deal with it.

    17. Re:Not interested... by t0qer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Hey nine nine, one more thing...

      Before u go saying I got shit from mommy and daddy, go read my journal, and fuck off. I doubt you've had to work as hard as I have. See now you're steppin over the line. I just stuck to comments about your comment in relation to the story, but now you're talkin shit about my upbringing?

      Are you sitting here on sunday drinking yourself beligerently talking shit to someone you don't even know on slashdot because,

      A. Talkin this way to real people scares you
      B. You're just bored and trying to fill up digital space?
      C. You're just a big freeking loser.

      I'd opt for c, I dunno. Maybe some other /.ers would care to drop some insight on this.

      Maybe you're not drinking and thats the problem. Chill out, stay ontopic, and don't talk out your ass ok? It'll make slashdot more fun for you.

    18. Re:Not interested... by DrJAKing · · Score: 1

      Peripheral vision is more sensitive to movement, and therefore flicker. Ecologically this is to do with detecting change in the part of the scene you're not attending - eg an approaching predator. There is a very old system that reorients your vision to peripheral targets, birds and lizards have it too. The human flicker threshold is generally more than 60Hz but less than 100Hz. In a game though, the frame rate is not purely a visual concern - it *may* reflect the temporal resolution of the simulation (in some engines), ie the time between consecutive calculations of the position of a projectile. This can have "physical effects" which is why hardcore gamers like to go for high framerates. But noone should care if their monitor can go much higher than 100Hz or so. You simply can't tell.

    19. Re:Not interested... by Tom · · Score: 2

      ID *IS* the company that pushes FPS technology to it's fullest.

      Right, their technology has always been top of the line. Now when it comes to storyline, gameplay, replayability, creativity and the other elements of a great game, that varies a lot and is usually in the medium segment.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    20. Re:Not interested... by Sex_On_The_Beach · · Score: 0

      You sound like you take it personal mate! Lighten up! Life is not all about FPS and numbers u pimply faced geek.

      U need sex on the beach.

    21. Re:Not interested... by guidemaker · · Score: 2

      IMAX does both, not only is it a huge frame, (70mm sideways, I think that is around 4x the resolution of 35mm, maybe more, I forget) but it also runs at 60fps.

      Don't think so. IMAX is 24fps. You're probably thinking of Douglas Trumbull's process, Showscan, which does run at 60fps and as a result is supposed to be almost indistinguishable from reality. Not that I've ever seen it, though...

    22. Re:Not interested... by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

      What do you know....I always thought....That'll be the first time I've ever been wrong.

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    23. Re:Not interested... by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      What i ment ot say was that the televeisionw as no longer a low rez idiot box

      It is now a high rez idiot box it AC3 decoding

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    24. Re:Not interested... by NineNine · · Score: 1

      "Take it seriously?" It's a game we're talking about right? A game, which, by definition is completely useless for anything other than fun?

    25. Re:Not interested... by t0qer · · Score: 2

      Uhhm no...

      Thresh won carmacks ferrarri years ago. A fully decked out ferrari is worth more than you or I make in a year combined.

      I played with him at the first major lan event called fragfest, held by dennis racine and dave allision, this was like years and years ago. Check out http://fragfest.com for more info.
      I played him there, and also on the only doom online service at the time, called dwango (acronym for doom wide area network gaming online or something like that. Thresh was also buds with Usurper, who did the whole spaceorb sponsership scene (fuck u spaceorb) and slayer, we got free time on his dwango, which was based out of santa clara I think.

      Anyways, go to any gamehouse, there's cash prizes and tournaments all the time. It's sad that you're one of those people who see video games as "just for fun" when the skill it takes to play some of them can be so competitive leagues, ladders and matches need to be created to see who's best.

      Yeah dude, and you're trying to insinuate that i'm delusional. Why don't you roll a fat blunt and chill homie. Sheeit.

    26. Re:Not interested... by Zathrus · · Score: 2

      Come on NineNine... you're smarter than that.

      First off, this "alpha" is 6 months old now... a helluva lot of coding and optimization can happen in 6 months. And the game isn't due out for another year still. By that time a PC that can run it will be extremely reasonable.

      Besides, a $2k PC isn't required. I could build a PC that could handle it for under $1000 (no monitor). Most of that cost is in the video card, because the video card is now considerably more complex than the CPU. But an ATI Radeon 9700 will be selling for at or under $100 by the time this comes out - which cuts 20-30% of the price right there.

      The PS2 can't handle a game of the graphical complexity that Doom3 will be. D3 is written for graphics chips that are two generations beyond what the PS2 is. Try doing dynamic lighting, bump mapping, curved surfaces, and high poly counts on a PS2... you can't. It's not made to handle it. Oh... and then do that at 1024x768 with 4x anti-aliasing and ansiotropic filtering... no, you don't need that kind of thing on the PS2 because the resolution is so damn poor (somewhat less than 640x480 and interlaced at that). And you're wondering why it's hardware intensive? WC3 is pretty, but it's not designed to push the limits of the hardware - Doom3 is.

      Finally, remember that id software is only partially a game company nowadays. I suspect they make a rather sizeable portion of their profit from licensing - $1M + royalties for the latest and greatest engine and support. Doom3 may not be everyone's FPS cup of tea, but it's likely that one of the games based off the engine will do exceptionally well, as Half-Life did with Q1, CS with Q2, and RtCW with Q3.

    27. Re:Not interested... by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 2

      Can you tell the difference between a monitor refresh rate of 60Hz and a monitor refresh rate of 100Hz?

      I thought so.

    28. Re:Not interested... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I remember reading your whiny little 'Fired from Metrocom' post that I see you have in your journal.

      You've got issues, buddy. These include both a persecution complex and delusions of grandeur.

      (See thread here)

    29. Re:Not interested... by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Dude, that's like saying that people playing basketball in the park "should take it seriously" because Michael Jordan made hundreds of millions of dollars a year. A. The chances that you'll ever get paid a dime for playing a video game are slim to none and B. It's still just a game (like basketball).

    30. Re:Not interested... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

      US> 30 -> 60, you will be hard pressed to notice the difference (but it IS possible)
      U>I would disagree with this assertion, though it does depend on the application.

      For people who have been trained to look for it, yes, they will be able to notice it. I was talking about the general populous. ;-)

      U> I'm particularly aware of this because the PS2 game I'm working on tends to run at 30 fps in the game shell, but occasionally hits 60. There's such a profound qualitative change that we might have to clamp the rate at 30 to prevent the bursts of 60 from making 30 look bad. :)

      Yeap, as a fellow PS2 developer I fully agree. I first noticed the 30 vs 60 difference back on the PS1.

      Sounds like you've also discovered that it's better to minimize the difference between the lowest and highest frame rate as it will appear smoother. I believe Carmack mentioned that was his findings as well in one of his Quake plans. i.e. minimize the frame rate drops.

      > Incidentally, I can tell the difference between a 60Hz refresh rate and a 70Hz refresh rate, 60Hz seems to flicker for me, especially in my peripheral vision.
      For CRTs, I also concur. 60 Hz flickers way too much! I don't have your visual perception quality (lucky b@$tard ;-) so I had to crank my CRT up to 100 Hz before I stopped noticing the flicker. Interestingly enough my LCD is only at 60 Hz and is rock solid (especially for text.)

      Cheers

      --
      Mathematics is queen of the sciences, but
      Number Theory is the queen of mathematics
      - Gauss - "Prince of Mathematics"

  48. Ti4200.. by Fweeky · · Score: 1

    1.4GHz Athlon, 512MB SDR, 128MB Ti4200 with 500MHz memory clock.

    I get about 20FPS in 640*480, with interesting parts happily going into jerk-o-vision (~10FPS). It takes an age to load, eats memory, and isn't very stable.

    1. Re:Ti4200.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bah. i'm on an athlon xp 1900+ w/256mbs PC-133 + 128mb gf3ti200 clocked at 210/460 and I get about 30fps with fights dropping to 15 or so.

      as for the load times, pay no attention to the instructions that tell you to exec runact.cfg and just type "map e3/e3_x" with "x" being the map number (1,2,3) and you'll find the levels load in about a minute or less.

      also if you look at the cvars in your config file you can disable specular lighting, shadows, change your z-buffer to 16bit and your color as well.... it easily boosts performance on my machine by 30% or more. still, the best fps i get is about 70fps in the "intro" id logo (map e3/intro)

    2. Re:Ti4200.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What part of "alpha" do you fail to understand?

  49. Slow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ~1fps on a dual p3/800, 1gb ram, radeon 7500. Gee, think I'll need a new pc?

  50. Re:FP by Anonymous+Cowrad · · Score: 1

    Not compared to run jump slide flip run jump jump jump slide jump fly shoot jump fly shoot jump fly shoot. Feel smile broaden after beating an amazingly cool puzzle.

    Super Mario Sunshine rocks your socks when it comes to gameplay.

    --

    --
    pants ahoy
  51. Taking bets by sielwolf · · Score: 2

    What are the odds on /. taking this story down by 8am tomorrow morning? I mean, really, did they check to see if Id intentionally leaked this?

    --
    What is music when you despise all sound?
    1. Re:Taking bets by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      /. takes stories down ?

    2. Re:Taking bets by damiam · · Score: 1

      Occasionally there have been some really wacko non-news stories that have appeared and then disappeared (stuff like "Cowboyneal please read this"). I don't think /. has ever removed a news story.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  52. Wow, doom3 looks so original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    A game where... you run around and shoot everything you see. Everything tries to kill you. Man I hope there are some mindless enemies that go "GRRRRRRR" a lot, that would make it perfect!

    tip: 120 fps of junk game is still a junk game.

  53. Unreal alpha by Dexter77 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Unreal alpha also leaked before it was released. It also required twice as much memory and processor power than the final version.

    I wouldn't draw any conclusions about the 3D-engine efficiency before the final version is released.

    1. Re:Unreal alpha by atari2600 · · Score: 1

      Its not Unreal - the game that was leaked in alpha is UnrealTournament 2003 demo and then then full version of UTK2003. Get your facts straight.

    2. Re:Unreal alpha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, Unreal was leaked to. It was a really crappy version, but it had parts of the UT and the Warfare code with it. And it was leaked by....
      ATI

    3. Re:Unreal alpha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So was Quake3's IHV (independent hardware vendor) test. There were Quake3 net games going on 3 months before the demo came out.

    4. Re:Unreal alpha by demonbug · · Score: 1
      Unreal alpha also leaked before it was released. It also required twice as much memory and processor power than the final version.


      Same with the Quake alpha, if anyone else can remember that far back.

    5. Re:Unreal alpha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, call me thick (patiently waits), but isn't this why its called an alpha?

    6. Re:Unreal alpha by Datafage · · Score: 1

      Oh no, I remember when the UT2k3 alpha was leaked almost a year ago, with gorgeous graphics for the whole 1 model I could get to load in an empty room...

      --

      Nicotine free Amish .sig.

    7. Re:Unreal alpha by re-Verse · · Score: 1

      Actually, years ago, Unreal Alpha was leaked, from a lan party in toronto where it was given its first official showing. God the trillof hooking up a network cable and watching that massive directory flow through, with hundreds of maps - most highly unfinished - many not enve in the final version of unreal. Those were they days.. when it was all too new to worry about piracy.. I did buy unreal the Day it came out - drove 100km to do so.

      Not to mention there was that unreal pre-alpha that was leaked... one map i beleive.. 4 rooms, and you could shoot floating eye prites out of your self by right clicking - to demonstrate the dynamic lighting. It had some sort of message in it,, it don't remember.. like "good luck guys on the new game!" or something off like that.

      Anyway, too much unreal history. Just wanted to state that technically, he could be right.

    8. Re:Unreal alpha by tortap-0 · · Score: 1

      Considering the fact that JC has been mostly done with the engine for a long time I wouldn't bet on any huge improvements. Some optimized drivers (like ATI and Q3A) and a few tweeks, other settings perhaps, but the leaked build should be indicative of performance.

  54. hell... by Ishkibble · · Score: 1
    i got an XP 2200, 512DDR PC2700, and a GeForcec 2 TI (ocerclocked from 250/400 to 275/445, and i can run it the game @ 800X600 medium detail and I have not gottan and FPS lower than 20

    i guess i just have my maching configured right or something

    it takes 43 muscles to smile and 3 to pull the trigger of a gun that is next to the head of a troll.

    1. Re:hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>i guess i just have my maching configured right or something

      Looking at your entire post I'd suggest you spend some time configuring a spell checker. Once we sort your spelling out we'll move onto your grammar.

  55. See Yesterday's Post! by simetra · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Why Do Games and Game Studios Fail?


    Yesterday we cried because games and game studios fail. Today we rejoice because an up-coming game has been leaked. We want to have our cake and eat it too. This mentality is a good part of the reason our types aren't taken seriously.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    1. Re:See Yesterday's Post! by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh get real. This is an unstable alpha with only 3 maps. It's not like anyone is going to keep playing this instead of buying the real version when it (finally) comes out!

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    2. Re:See Yesterday's Post! by pVoid · · Score: 1

      'Our types' wrote the games... it's not like we're dealing with congressmen here.

      Besides, the leak is just a leak, nobody is going to *not* buy the game because they have found their copy of an unstable 5 FPS build...

      if anything, they'll redownload the warez version of the Beta... at which point they really will hurt the game.

      But let's face it, right now, this leak is only going to spin the gossip mill... that's it.

      Btw, if anyone is stupid enough to go buy a new card based on a leaked version of a game... ahh.. sigh. whatever.

    3. Re:See Yesterday's Post! by Rew190 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, this is a test of a gaming engine, not a full-fledged game.

      This is by far not a finished product, and shouldn't be treated as such. The folks who are downloading this are mostly interested in getting a rough idea of how the finished product is going to run on their computer and what this engine is capable of doing.

      All this does is pique interest in the finished product. This is not it. Make the distinction.

    4. Re:See Yesterday's Post! by timeOday · · Score: 2
      I guess you will have a point, IF Doom 3 fails because of this.

      I.e. you have no point.

    5. Re:See Yesterday's Post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People should make the distinction yet are already criticizing it -- see author's whinging about being disappointed with the low framerate. Yes, even though this is a leaked alpha probably only meant to be played on the highest-spec of machines! So great, now people are saying "Wow, Doom 3 runs slooooow" based on this leaked alpha version.

    6. Re:See Yesterday's Post! by arbitrary+nickname · · Score: 1

      But there's a good chance that less informed gamers will play it, see how slow and unstable it is, and not bother with the full game.

      Personally, I'm not interested in the game. It really looks like it's sacrificed the classic Doom gameplay (large swarms of enemies) for fancy graphics, and probably never more than 3-4 enemies at a time...

    7. Re:See Yesterday's Post! by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      I can't believe this got modded up to a 4! Note to moderators: flaming is usually not insightful.

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    8. Re:See Yesterday's Post! by unixbob · · Score: 1

      But surely the people who are tech savvy enough to be able to find this "alpha" are the sort of people who will understand it's an alpha demo.

      --
      The Romans didn't find algebra very challenging, because X was always 10
    9. Re:See Yesterday's Post! by DetrimentalFiend · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that id has a reputation second to none. I make it a point to buy anything that id puts out because I know that it will be worth it and I believe I am not alone.

    10. Re:See Yesterday's Post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh good grief, I'm getting sick of all the losers that want to take the moral high ground and look down their noses at others... Guys, face it, it was leaked... How many of id's games haven't been leaked? I mean, come on... it should be obvious by now...

    11. Re:See Yesterday's Post! by Moofie · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      That's funny. I don't buy anything id puts out, because I know it won't be anything other than an engine technology demonstrator with deathmatch built in, and oh yeah maybe a couple single player levels thrown in as an afterthought.

      I make it a point to buy games that people who are not id make with id's engines.

      I believe I'm not alone, too. But I'm not sure you guys will count my invisible rabbit.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    12. Re:See Yesterday's Post! by junkgrep · · Score: 2

      Regardless of how likely or realistic YOU think the potential bad effects of the leak are, it was id's decision as to whether to take those risks. You have a right to scoff at what they want: but that doesn't change the fact that it was supposed to be their decision.

    13. Re:See Yesterday's Post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, everybody has known that alpha versions of -everything- run like crap. It's not to test to see how well the game can run for them, it's to test to see how pretty it is and some of the neat features.

      This is one of the -most- stable alphas I've seen, in that what I haven't seen is many reposts of crashes (And those are all for 2-3 bugs that are easily fixed).

      I can tell you now that I'm definately going to buy this game, so John Carmack, would it be wrong for me to get a copy of the alpha too see what it's like givin that it can -NOT- affect my decision?

  56. Well, the obvious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone gotten it working in any of the wine releases?

  57. WTF ? by Pahroza · · Score: 1

    I'm certainly not an innocent when it comes to downloading software, but this most certainly doesn't belong on /.

    If you want to pirate software, go somewhere else. This shouldn't be a forum for a bunch of links on where to download this pre-release game. Send a damn private message if you have to. It's not like the people with a will can't find it on their own, now that they know it's out there.

    1. Re:WTF ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? Since when DEMO has become a complete GAME?

    2. Re:WTF ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when ENGLISH has become your primary language?

    3. Re:WTF ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since be child....ask you why?

  58. Is this significant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a lot younger I watched a lot of horror movies. Giant ants, space aliens, zombies, you name it, getting splattered all over the screen. Nowadays I cringe so much at the outlandish rubbish in these movies that I can't stand to watch them for more than 10 minutes or so. I guess I grew old.

    Anyway from that perspective I understand why (mostly younger) people might like these games. They are basically just souped-up horror movies. What I don't understand, however, is why these games are being hailed as some kind of magnificent achievement on the part of Id software. After all it's just pulp, and I never considered the horror movies I watched in my youth to be ground-breaking or otherwise significant.

    The only reason I can think of why these games would warrant the kind of dedication I see you guys put into it (very expensive graphics cards, hours upon hours of playing to gain skill) is when they well, basically define your universe. Which leads me to wonder, do you guys ever do anything besides playing games, reading /. and watching porn?

  59. Just Wondering by denisonbigred · · Score: 1

    I Considered submitting this story 2 days ago when I first got the Alpha build, but was afraid of possible legal repercussions. Was I wrong to be afraid, is there not a reasonable chance of getting in trouble for admitting in a VASTLY public forum that I am in possesion of such contraband?
    Running a P4 1.9ghz with a Gforce3 64mb videocard and 512megs of RDRAM im getting about 15-20 fps. What I find most interesting is the ability to add your own lights, but whenever I do so, I get about 5fps if im lucky.

    --

    "There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals."
    1. Re:Just Wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the ability to add your own lights is only there for developers. lots of key binds are for (presumably) Tim Willits to test the levels.

  60. Get Better FPS by The+Joe+Kewl · · Score: 2, Informative

    To get the leaked doom alpha running a little smoother or your POS system. Open the "doomconfig.cfg" in wordpad (not notepad, as it can screw things up sometimes). Scroll to the bottom of the file, and work your way up changing the following settings:

    seta r_ext_compress_textures "1" seta r_colorbits "16" seta r_depthbits "16" seta r_mode "3" seta r_fullscreen "1" seta r_shadows "0" seta r_useStandardGL "1"

    This should get your fps up a little bit, but you will lose some very nice eye candy!

  61. what I wanna know by abe+ferlman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Will winex run it?

    Or am I going to have to install that leaked version of Longhorn after all?

    --
    microsoftword.mp3 - it doesn't care that they're not words...
    1. Re:what I wanna know by robson · · Score: 2

      Will winex run it?

      Just wait for the final version next Spring. There'll be a Linux release, I'm sure.

    2. Re:what I wanna know by kpansky · · Score: 1

      Inquiring minds want to know. Will someone with the alpha report on its usability inside WINE/X?

      --

      --Kevin
    3. Re:what I wanna know by Guspaz · · Score: 2

      What with the framerate hit WineX gives you, and DooM Alpha being unplayable on most systems today (GeForce 3 on AthlonXP 1900+ here, and when I fire I'm waiting 20-30 seconds for the next frame to render), it will be even worse on WineX. There have been linux ports of every Id game so far. Just be patient and wait for the DooM 3 linux port.

    4. Re:what I wanna know by kpansky · · Score: 1

      I have extreme patience :)... still waiting for Neverwinter. Im just curious to see if other people have gotten it working in wine while its downloading for me.

      And _I've_ already put my money where my mouth is and bought my copy from tuxgames :).

      --

      --Kevin
    5. Re:what I wanna know by xercist · · Score: 2

      [21:36:33] [xercist@xernet] [doom3]% winex doom.exe
      [21:36:37] [xercist@xernet] [doom3]%

      Apparently not. Not even an error message or something. Perhaps we can ask ATI to leak a linux binary while they're at it.

      --

      --
      grep "xercist" /dev/random ...you'll find me in there someday
    6. Re:what I wanna know by bodan · · Score: 1

      Is there any real PC emulator for linux that might do this? I mean, something that creates a true virtual PC, not just like VMWare or winex stuff. That way, I figure we could install windows with software OpenGL on it, run the emulator distributed over about 20 computers and maybe get 60fps at a decent resolution, even with monsters on screen (I get 1fps in the machinery room after the keypad when the zombies attack, on a GF3). Really now, what is distributed computing for except SETI and H-Bombs?

      --
      "I think I am a fallen star. I should wish on myself."
    7. Re:what I wanna know by Guspaz · · Score: 2

      You're lucky, patience is something I wish I had more of ;-)

  62. Just say no... by JensR · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a shame that Slashdot actually links to this software. Id software and John Carmack have been very supportive of the community, ignoring reverse engineering even though their licenses don't allow it and giving a lot of information about the technologies. All you should NEED until the game is released are screenshots and the movies. So don't spoil it for you and others.

    1. Re:Just say no... by Bartmoss · · Score: 2

      Whoever wants the leaked beta will get it anyway. At least this way, slashdot can overload their servers. ;-)

  63. Alpha Test != actual game by Cornelius+the+Great · · Score: 3, Informative

    Keep in mind that this version is the same version used at the E3 presentation, which means it was optimized for a Radeon 9700, which has been boasting some pretty impressive fps scores. I get only about 20 fps on my Geforce4ti/4200 (128mb version), and my framerate drops below 5 when more than 1 monster is on the screen.

    If you want the demo, don't use filesharing apps...they've been too unreliable for the file. Try doin a search on packetnews for IRC channels that host the file (I got mine at addictz.net #datavault).

    --
    Sigs are for losers
    1. Re:Alpha Test != actual game by Peyna · · Score: 2

      Yeah, sort of like when people test the speed of a computer using an application specifically optimized for it, you're going to get unrealistic results in some cases.

      Besides, I'd rather not waste my time trying to get this and play something that is only going to run at 20 fps and not impress me. I'll wait until there is a formal demo released, or have the opportunity to see it on a friend's machine. That way I'll actually be playing with the final product.

      If you test drove a lot of 'alpha' versions of the cars on the road today you might not want to drive the final version at all. =]

      --
      What?
  64. Yeah, and... by Luminair · · Score: 1

    There is just as much evidence to support that "log" as being the truth as there is to support this "log" which I just retrieved from IRC:

    I am the QUEEEEEN OF FRANCE!!!!

    Translation: both are probably fake.

    1. Re:Yeah, and... by TotallyUseless · · Score: 1

      You are a consumer whore!

      --

      Time for some tasty Shiner Bock!
  65. Ignorance...... by Viewsonic · · Score: 2

    The graphical jump on Doom3 from ANYTHING out right now is 10 fold. You can go play your Warcraft 3 all you want, but it doesnt look ANYTHING like Doom3. This is as real as we've gotten so far, and you better upgrade because it's going to set the bar for every new game on the market like Doom and Quake both did. If you dont like games, best stay away from whats going to happen in the next year.

  66. My framerates and impressions. by dnaumov · · Score: 3, Interesting

    System:

    AMD T-Bird 1400, 512 mb ddr, Creative GF4 Ti4200.
    Windows 2000 with Service Pack 3.
    30.82 NVIDIA Detonator Drivers.

    Running at 640x480x32, I average at 30 fps when using low quality settings. When there's heavy action on screen, the framerates drop below 5. The intro "map e3\intro" is absolutely jaw dropping, albeit beit pretty slow on my machine. After watching the intro and playing around with the 3 included maps, I have no wonders that people at E3 were complaining that "Stop showing us the pre-rendered stuff, show us the engine" to which ID employees responded with something along the lines of "Well, this *IS* the engine". My knowledge of English is not good enough to be able to express how impressive this thing is. The scary atmosphere, lighting, shadows, creepy noises. ID did it all right. This is far from the "real thing", as it's only an Alpha of the engine that was shown months ago and the full game is still months off. Still. Two Words: My GOD.

    P.S: I hear that this thing also has Multiplayer and the Editor included as well, but you have to hack around to get them to work.

    1. Re:My framerates and impressions. by vranash · · Score: 1

      While I somehow doubt I'd be able to get the alpha running on my lovable old Celeron 333 with a Radeon PCI, I just thought of how well this leaked alpha COULD help Doom3/Id if it's got the Editor built in, since that means the development community can have a six+ month head start on the games release to get used to the tools (no dbout likely to change, but hey people still use MS products despite near constant changes to the ui with every revision)

      All I can say is GO ID!

  67. Re:The losers who downloaded it... by symbolic · · Score: 1, Redundant

    ... are every bit as much to blame. Sheesh...can't people freaking wait until it's released? Is it really THAT important that they warez an alpha version of the game? Get a grip, people. If you really appreciate a good game, show some respect already.

  68. fps and sys info by Satanboy · · Score: 1

    well I got it to see how my system will run the game when it comes out. I know its not optimized yet, and is buggy, so remember that these are extremely preliminary numbers.

    I am running:

    asus TUSL2-C
    celeron 1.2 OCed to 1.4 (tualatin)
    PNY geforce 4 ti 4200 OCed to 4400
    512 MB Crucial PC 133 RAM

    results:

    I average 10-20 FPS in most instances, when multiple zombies or imps come at me, the FPS can slow down to 2 or even 0

    the game is beautiful and I will buy it when it comes out, once I get the beta and the demo of course, and optimize my system for the games release ;-)

    I am rather pleased though, I figured my system would just choke on it since its not a god box, but it was able to at least run the game.

    I have tried other alphas in the past and my experience has always been that performance was about 1/3 of real gameplay. So once the real game comes out, I expect to get a huge boost in performance.

    I'm sure all the guys at ID aren't too happy, but they should understand that us folks that like to tweak systems, are more or less not getting this to play the game, but to get our systems ready for when the game actually hits the shelves. :-)

  69. Re:The losers who downloaded it... by moonbender · · Score: 0, Troll

    Huh? What the fuck is wrong with downloading the alpha? You might be disillusioned or something if you don't remember it's an early built, but hell, nobody is losing any money. I have no idea why you think playing the alpha is disrespectful, of all things. (For the record, I haven't ... yet.)

    --
    Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
  70. I'll buy Doom III to support innovation ... by fleppir · · Score: 1

    ... but I WANT to be spoiled :)

    --
    I am the Barber of Seville.
  71. troll by snol · · Score: 1

    There's too many things wrong with what you just said; you can't possibly be for real.

  72. Re:download link----warning by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 1

    !!!WARNING!!!!!
    Above is goatse link.
    Just tryin to keep the public informed.

    -D

  73. This is disgusting. Slashdot you suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have lost what little respect I had left for you.

    Just when I thought Slashdot couldn't get any worse you guys had to go and pull this shit.

    Advocating WAREZ now, eh? Wonderful.

    How many of your readers do you suppose are software developers? Did you stop and consider how they would feel about SLASHDOT ADVOCATING the stealing of software?

    You guys bitch and whine about possible GPL violations by comercial companies yet post links to download STOLEN software? So what if its ALPHA software and not commerically viable, You guys are accomplices in stealling proprietary software.

    The editor that posted this story should be FIRED IMMEDIATLY!

    Had you removed the links to download the software I wouldn't have a beef. The story is news worthy BUT by including the links to download the software you are no longer reporting news you are now ADVOCATING the stealing of software.

    Hey, it may or may not be illegal to post the links but you know what, it's not RIGHT.

    Fucking Idiots!

    I would suspect this stunt has landed Slashdot on ID software's shit list.

    Good luck getting any future interviews with J.Carmack.

    1. Re:This is disgusting. Slashdot you suck. by PhreakinPenguin · · Score: 1

      Somehow I don't see Taco getting fired.

      --


      My sig of choice is Marlboro
    2. Re:This is disgusting. Slashdot you suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy tiger....

      the real reason your so mad it the linux port is 2 years away! haha

      Linux sux

  74. Have some respect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe Slashdot is just claiming to act like the Press and spread the news, but this is illegal software, chaps. Heck, even Carmack posts here and CmdrTaco feels it necessary to "break" the story and also link to a site that claims to host RAR files of the actual leaked alpha?

    Great job.

  75. A Bad Thing Made Worse For Me, Personally by R-2-RO · · Score: 1

    I was hoping to avoid ANY contact with Doom III until it was released (linux version of course) One of the things that made the original Doom so awesome and scary to me was that I had only heard of it at the time. No screenshots, no video's no nothing. I played it with a pretty clean slate. Figuring the name Doom III itself was hype enough, I emailed John Carmack pleading for no ScreenShots, no nothing until after the game was released. No luck there. well ok, I can avoid them. Then the video's came. BAH! damn u! It was getting hard to avoid it, NOW the damn thing is leaked, No it isnt 'the' game, but its pretty much a good look at whats coming. Shit. All the surprise has been spoiled, because Everywhere I go, there is a screenshot posted FRONTPAGE, Bah.. Damn u ATI (or whoever leaked it) Damn u all!

    --
    Thank you. Drive through. (:wq)
    1. Re:A Bad Thing Made Worse For Me, Personally by Old+Wolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here's a hint. Why don't you not click on the links to the screenshots and videos, or not download the leaked version. Sheesh.

    2. Re:A Bad Thing Made Worse For Me, Personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you just a moron, or are you physically incapable of setting your browser options to not download images automagically?

      Inquiring minds want to know.

    3. Re:A Bad Thing Made Worse For Me, Personally by R-2-RO · · Score: 1

      ... and one for you.. Read the whole comment before you post a reply. I didn't click on the screenshot links..

      Quote: "... because Everywhere I go, there is a screenshot posted FRONTPAGE"

      --
      Thank you. Drive through. (:wq)
    4. Re:A Bad Thing Made Worse For Me, Personally by R-2-RO · · Score: 1

      Being able to disable image downloads does not exclude me from being a moron. I am very much a moron AND very capable of disabling image downloads. But umm. Who wants to browse the web that way you mor.. err DickHead

      --
      Thank you. Drive through. (:wq)
    5. Re:A Bad Thing Made Worse For Me, Personally by damiam · · Score: 1

      I have never seen a Doon III screenshot posted on the front page on any web site. If you browse the sort of sites that would show such a thing, and if it's really a big deal for you, then perhaps you should talk to them instead of bitching on slashdot. Even better, you could just disable images for those sites.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    6. Re:A Bad Thing Made Worse For Me, Personally by Xenex · · Score: 1

      That still doesn't explain your "Then the video's came. BAH! damn u!" comment.

      You had choice about watching those.

  76. ALPHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Remember its only in alpha stage, and in no way is the code even closed to being optimized.

  77. re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    runs pretty nicely for me: athlon 1600, 512 ram, geforce 3 wimp version. playable, which is rather cool for such tech.

  78. Re:download link----warning by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

    Dammit, now I have to reload at -1 to see what you are talking about

  79. My resutls with Radeon 9700 by avatar382 · · Score: 0

    I have a Radeon 9700 with AXP @ 1620MHz, 512 MB RAM, nForce motherboard

    Ran alpha demo @ 1024x768 and framerates run 30-50 on default settings (all eye candy :-)), probably 35 average.

    Remarkable I think considering that when Quake came out, Voodoo 1 cards were running that at 30 fps tops!

    I am still recovering....

  80. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at the "information wants to be free" people carping about the warezed Doom demo.

    Oh, it's only ok to steal stuff if it isn't from Id, right?

  81. Re:download it hete ---useless, parent cant spell by t0qer · · Score: 2

    DON'T DO IT!!

    Hey i'm on it right now with 150 other people all saying the same thing...

    The parent doesn't deserve mod points because there IS no doom 3 here. Completely useless utter nonsense dog dick crap. SO MOD THE PARENT DOWN

    kthnx bye.

  82. I saw it on kazaa for over 2 weeks now by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1, Troll
    I figured its a fraud and never downloaded it. Now I think I will do so.

    1. Re:I saw it on kazaa for over 2 weeks now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a fraud.

      the "Doom 3" file on kazaa is Sim Theme Park Gold Edition.

      my friend told me so...

  83. Linux version of the leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I refuse to play Doom ]I[ until they leak the version ported to linux.

  84. Re:FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A game that is an exception to this is Rez--a game full of visual and audio beauty, and some of the best gameplay I've enountered on a console. Who cares if it's only an hour long? It's so wonderful I could play it for hours on end...

  85. Think before downloading | MD5s? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every skript kiddie in sundry is going to be trying to put out trojanised editions of this leaked version.
    Keep this in mind if you plan on downloading it.
    Actually, how do we know that original leak didn't have a custom-built trojan in it? Even ID might've put some phone-home code in it to keep tracks on whether the NDA is being obeyed.

    1. Re:Think before downloading | MD5s? by sethstorm · · Score: 0

      I dunno about script kiddies, but I'd say that it'd be good idea for anyone who slaps the trojans on it to be summarily executed.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  86. Re:The losers who downloaded it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh please, get off your high horse already.

    "show some respect already. "

    Cough, umm ok. I'll show respect when the game industry starts repecting me first.

    They can start by finishing games before they release them and not doing the 25MB patch a month later.

  87. Re:FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next you'll be saying that Myst has the greatest graphics ever.

    I love an FPS much as the next guy but there has been little true innovation in the field for way too long. Doom was released in, what, '94? Look at UT2003 and, well, Doom 3. Pretty, sure, but not much more than a new 3D-rendering engine and different ways of blowing the crap out of your opponent, be they AI or human.

    And like I said, the Survival Horror thing has been done! I don't particularly care if Doom 3's stuff is real-time and RE for the Gamecube isn't. In the end we're paying for the same thing: more and more expensive hardware for the shallow feel of saying "ooh pretty". I'm not saying Doom 3 won't have good gameplay (logically I can't not having dl-ed the alpha) but everything Carmack says about it (weak LAN-play, no secondary fire modes, etc.) makes it sound like it will be a very pretty, very boring game.

    Maybe it will all be in the presentation. The ugly monster jumps out from behind a pillar and yells "boo!". That's been done, too. I just don't like the idea of plunking down $1000 for the ATI 20000 just so I can play my $50 game with half-ass gameplay. It reeks of the video game industry following hollywood's business model.

  88. its a trap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when u turn down all of the graphics settings, doom 3 looks worse and runs slower than quake 3! nice job, john dumbass!

  89. Re:download it hete ---useless, parent cant spell by Directrix1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I second this, the parent (of the parent) has no friggin' clue what he is talking about. No doom3 here, tried it. Its a hit and miss and a big waste of time, designed only to get you to dload dc++, which is a project that he is a member of. Mod the parent (of the parent) down.

    --
    Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
  90. Re:download it hete ---useless, parent cant spell by someonehasmyname · · Score: 1

    Yup. He's right... What a joke. Mod parent's parent down.

    --
    Common sense is not so common.
  91. What a coincidence by LordOfYourPants · · Score: 2, Troll

    I click in to read this article and I see a banner ad at the top from ATI for a Radeon 9700.

    1. Re:What a coincidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I click in to read this article and I see a banner ad at the top from ATI for a Radeon 9700.

      Which is why I always use ad blocking software. I mean, Taco wouldn't want me to think that he has a conflict of interest here right?

  92. Re:download it hete ---useless, parent cant spell by Spytap · · Score: 1

    Smae as above, nothing here, move along now.

  93. Is this that bad for Id? by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Yeah, I hear a lot of complaining, but riddle me this: Is Id actually gonna lose money because this was leaked? Is there anyone who would go to all the trouble of downloading an ALPHA VERSION, and then not get the full version later?

    Isn't it possible that all of the publicity might even help Id with free advertising?

    I mean hell, they've even gotten a free slashdot story out of it. A million geeks seeing your upcoming game--that's advertising.

    1. Re:Is this that bad for Id? by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      It might give their competition some idea of what they're going to have to compete with. If ID had some secret killer feature it's not a secret anymore.

    2. Re:Is this that bad for Id? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That post isn't trolling. Henry V .009 is raising a valid point.

    3. Re:Is this that bad for Id? by Satanboy · · Score: 1

      logical reason, just remember they already let their competition see all of this at e3, even though they didn't have the code to reverse engineer. . ..

    4. Re:Is this that bad for Id? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have got to be kidding me.

      Is there anyone who would go to all the trouble of downloading an ALPHA VERSION, and then not get the full version later?

      Is there anyone who would go to all the trouble of downloading an ALPHA VERSION, and then not download the full version later?

    5. Re:Is this that bad for Id? by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 2

      Those people, it can be assumed, will download the full version whether or not the alpha is released. Which means that the alpha release is irrelevant to piracy for those folks.

      So again, my statement that Id doesn't lose out on this still stands.

    6. Re:Is this that bad for Id? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad that they're all using iD's engines anyway, except Epic Megagames. However, they just released UT2K3 and UT2K3 does not come close as far as technology to this.

  94. Re:download link----warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hahaha. browse at -1. that's where all the good shit is.

  95. Re:Speed by roguerez · · Score: 2

    I get 150 fps in 1600x1200x32 with detail high on my Commodore VIC 20. Glad they also support older machines.

  96. Re:Not interested... (Frame rate of TV) by voxel · · Score: 0

    Actually, television is 60 fields per second, not frames per second.

    The difference is it is 60 interlaced fields. When the video signal is comming from a game console, this usually means each field is simply doubled resulting in a true 30 flat frames per second. So, just to make your somewhat rude post more valid, a NTSC television will give you the end effect of a frame rate cap of 30 frames per second, which is fairly poor.

    - Voxel

    --
    Modesty is one of life's greatest attributes
  97. more like 4-day :P by dirtsurfer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was wondering when this was finally gunna show up on slashdot.
    Doom 2 is probably my favorite game EVER in terms of hours spent enjoying it, and I've been looking forward to Doom 3 ever since John Carmack mentioned the idea in his .plan. Like A lot of people, I even forked over the money for a total system upgrade just so I'll be able to get decent framerates (Althon2000, Geforce4 Ti4400, 512mb ddr2700)

    Anyway, of course I was really excited when people on efnet started mentioning an alpha being leaked, and I managed to get ahold of it that night. So I loaded it up, and played it for a few minutes.. and closed it and deleted it. Yes, it looks great. Very promising. But really, it's not worth the download. There are only 3 levels, and you can tell that even those aren't polished yet. From playing it, I learned that it's a beautiful game and awesome engine, and it's going to be fun as hell. But anyone can see that just by looking at the screenshots that have been around forever. This alpha is more of a spoiler than anything else. Instead of going out and trying to get your hands on it, you'd be better off to just wait for the real game to come out.

    1. Re:more like 4-day :P by Herkum01 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can just see the John Carmack and his stock broker meeting,

      Stock Broker: John, you stocks have been tanking lately, and the whole IT has been hit hard. Your portfolio is starting to get a little weak.

      John Carmack: (jumps in a telephone booth, ripes off his shirt to reveal his costume, with an "IT" on his chest) The computer industry is hurting, must get it to rebound. I will create a new game, Doom 3 to save the Industry! They will all have to buy new computers to play it! That will improve my portfolio right?

      Stock Broker: Yes!

      John Carmack I am on it(leaps out the window flying to his Cubicle of Productivity)!

    2. Re:more like 4-day :P by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 3, Funny

      Let me put it like this...

      I got ahold of the alpha demo at around 10am on Friday.

      I played it on my GeForce2GTS at around 10:05am on Friday.

      I picked up an ATI Radeon 9700 at 5pm on Friday. Thank dawg for leaked Alphas on payday :P :)

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    3. Re:more like 4-day :P by andang · · Score: 1

      *drools*

    4. Re:more like 4-day :P by LafinJack · · Score: 1

      I picked up an ATI Radeon 9700 at 5pm on Friday. Thank dawg for leaked Alphas on payday :P :)

      And by the time it's released you're gonna need a Radeon 10700. :P

      --
      we are building a religion
      a limited edition
      we are now accepting callers
      for these pendant key chains
  98. I think its just plain weird by macaries · · Score: 1

    I understand the thrill of game play but why does everyone seem to except bloody, violent games with out question? Makes me feel like we are bunch of unenlightened idiots. I am not some extreme peace advocate just a normal person. I've been the first person on the scene of some major car accidents, Blood flowing out of the car, skin peeled back etc... Those images have never left me. I am not squeemish about it but it certainly is a sobering site that I would never want to relive in a game for pleasure. Sorry if I am preaching its just really lame in my opinion. Do something creative with your Mac.

    1. Re:I think its just plain weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had ever seen an anvil fall on someone would you say the same thing about looney tunes?

    2. Re:I think its just plain weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree
      Me kisses my gamecube

    3. Re:I think its just plain weird by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      wy shoodent wee except bluddy vilent vidio gams if wee liek thehm? Im sory yu didnot liek seing peples skines peled bak but jeez thet wes jest the site you saew. Im naught uninlitened. Mebbe in yer nex hippicriticl supereor post yue can clerify yer pisition mer clerly. gud speling and yusing the propr werds wen yue speke wil help qite a bit. personly I liek tooo sit don an play watevr I liek with ot some lam as condesending hippo crit critisising mye evry moev. And the hoarse you road in on bucko.

    4. Re:I think its just plain weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You postem truth.

  99. Hey, it's an ATI advertisement campaign! by snofla · · Score: 1

    When reading this article I noticed it had the ATI Radeon 9700 ad banner

    --
    i don't like style guides
  100. Re:download it hete ---useless, parent cant spell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, it's available on most DC hubs right now. I won't tell you where I am now, but I can tell you that a whole bunch of people are trying to download it on the mentioned hub right now. Hop around, and search for "doom" with file size 364 MB or larger. You'll find it, guaranteed. I'm downloading it at 56 KB/s right now, and have 129 MB of it.

    It's also on eDonkey/Overnet, so you can go to www.edonkey2000.com, www.emule-project.net, http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/mldonkey/ or www.overnet.com to download a client, and then http://www.sharereactor.com/release.php?id=2946 to add it to your download list. eDonkey/Overnet is usually slow as heck, though, so I recommend DC++.

  101. ATI leak by smallstepforman · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can imagine the atmosphere at iD headquarters near Dallas right now;
    John - "Damn bastards, the ATI folk. They leaked the alpha."
    Xian - "We've got to punish ATI somehow for this."
    John - "I know, I'll cripple performance on ATI cards. I'll just insert a sleep() function call here and half the framerate when I detect an ATI card. That will teach them."
    Xian - "Excellent."

    --
    Revolution = Evolution
    1. Re:ATI leak by peterpi · · Score: 1
      I don't know why the parent is modded troll.

      Graphics card manufacturers need ID games (i.e. Doom3) to run well on their cards. If the latest card sucks running Doom3, it will hurt sales.

      ATI could really have shot themselves in the foot if Carmack and co give competing hardware more attention.

    2. Re:ATI leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw that. I have a 9700 Pro arriving in about a week. If the framerates are lower than competing/last generation's cards then I won't be buying id's latest game. Nuff Said

    3. Re:ATI leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Screw that. I have a 9700 Pro arriving in about a week. If the framerates are lower than competing/last generation's cards then I won't be buying id's latest game. Nuff Said"

      Translation:
      I'm a big fuckin' baby. Nuff Said.

  102. It's a habit... by colaboy · · Score: 1

    ATI seems to be making a habit of this... In July 2000 they issued press releases a couple of days before MacWorld giving information on yet-to-be announced mac systems, and got themselves into an uncomfortable situation with Apple. See http://www.idg.net/idgns/2000/07/24/ATITakesBlameF orAppleLeak.shtml for a summary.

  103. The real reason this made it to the front page by Diclophis · · Score: 1

    hmmm radeon ad on the same page as the doom 3 newspost... conspiracy?

  104. Oh yea.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm downloading it as I type this, even though I was extemely disappointed with Doom II. For some reason I have the feeling that this will be just like every single first person shooter game since Wolfenstein 3D... Bah. Unimaginative game.

  105. It is a Debug Build by Paladine97 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I checked it out and it is easily a debug build. There debug symbols are intact as well as linking to OutputDebugString. Therefore, it is HIGHLY unoptimized, so don't even count on getting any decent FPS.

    1. Re:It is a Debug Build by DaCool42 · · Score: 1

      So strip it. Performance now boosted.

      --

      ----
      All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
    2. Re:It is a Debug Build by PissedOffGuy · · Score: 1

      strip doesnt do anything to optimize the unoptimized debug code.

    3. Re:It is a Debug Build by forgoil · · Score: 2

      oooh, hidden source software. Wouldn't this mean that you could get a lot more information about the code? ;))

  106. Some performance tweaks..... by Chicane-UK · · Score: 5, Informative

    These are linked on some of the many different threads relating to this story, but for those of you in a rush and not wanting to look around.

    Admittedly this will make the game look nowhere as amazing as it currently does, but these two tweaks (which you can enter on the console) worked wonders for me...

    r_useStandardGL 1 - the default is set to '0' - using this toggle will disable the bump mapping.

    r_shadows 0 - the default is set to '1' - using this toggle will disable the dynamic shadows which, whilst looking amazing, melt your computer.

    Some other things worth noting that I have discovered... if you edit the 'runact.cfg' (which if you have downloaded this leaked copy, you will know you have to exec - and it takes about 5 minutes loading up textures and stuff) - if you comment out the bottom three of the top 4 'exec' statements to read like :


    exec activate_demo1
    #exec activate_demo2
    #exec activate_demo3
    #exec activate_intro


    That 'exec runact.cfg' takes a hella lot less time and the game seems to run as normal.

    One last thing.. should we even be talking about this? I know that John Carmack reads /. - I am sure it must be reassuring for him and the id team to see how much people are wanting (and enjoying) this game but he must be pretty pissed about the whole affair!

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    1. Re:Some performance tweaks..... by epukinsk · · Score: 3, Funny

      I found the r_enableDoomIII 0 command worked wonders on my machine. Of course, the game looks a lot like a Windows desktop with that setting disabled. Still, I got like 80 fps on my Neomagic 128 card on my laptop. Can't beat that.

      Erik

  107. OMG. Terrorists. by wo1verin3 · · Score: 2
    They've been quiet for a long time, but not quiet enough. It looks like the Doom III leak was a plot. Click below for a shot that our crack spy team managed to take:

    Source Of The Leak

  108. Re:The losers who downloaded it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, they can start by not demanding that I put my $50+ CD in the drive every time I want to play the game.

    "Please prove you are not a criminal, we think you probably are".

  109. a few minutes later..... by nebenfun · · Score: 4, Funny

    John- "One more thing..."
    Xian- "Yes?"
    John- "I've got missles."
    Xian- "Oh really...."
    John- "The aerospace tests are going
    better than planned."
    Xian- "Excellent! I'll get ATI's address."

  110. Right mouse button as 'forward' by wackybrit · · Score: 2

    Wow. That's pretty kickass.

    Since Quake 1 I've always used the right mouse button as 'forward' since it was the most popular method at the time.. but nowadays people tend to use W as forwards, and right mouse as secondary weapon.

    I'm guessing Doom 3 won't have secondary weapons, so the right mouse forward thing can come back.

    Good, cuz I tried playing Quake 3 using W as forwards and I couldn't get it.

    1. Re:Right mouse button as 'forward' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for q3 (and q2, and q1) i use:

      forward: right mouse #2
      backward: mouse button #4 (thumb button)
      fire: left mouse #1
      weap next: mousewheel up
      weap prev: mousewheel down

      and i kick most peoples ass. WSAD... pfft!

      Sludgehead

      http://www.theclq.com/asp/find.asp?pid=38489254

  111. Whether or not by JayFlatland · · Score: 3, Insightful

    posting this story was a moral thing for slashdot to do, it's still the biggest news event in gaming for quite a while. Can't expect the press to not spread the news.

    --
    Badgers? Badgers! We don't need no stinkin' Badgers!
    1. Re:Whether or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slahdot is the press, they have to report these things. Its not like they said "here it is, go download it."

      As far as my impressions, its AMAZING. I'm working on a UT2003 mod right now and myself and the project leader are seriously considering switching over to Doom3. Our only concern is whether the engine can handle fairly large outdoor environments. Seems like this alpha highlights the gameplay a lot. I can see them optimizing the engine more for indoor levels since it fits their "scifi horror" theme a bit more.

  112. i'm sure it's just a coincidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Must be just a coincidence, from what I've seen ATI seems to have upped their internet advertising alot recently. They have a huge obtrusive popup on gamedev.net, and of course there's that banner right up at the top of the page I'm viewing right now.

    If I wasn't so trusty this would definitely smell like some marketing chicanery.

    (OK I'm not that trusty, here's my conspiracy theory: ATI's next gen cards are out now but doom 3 isn't out yet. They leak the doom3 alpha to get high end consumers thinking about doom3 cards at a time when they still have the lead against NVidia. Throw in some 9700 ads all over the web to make sure people know where to get their high end cards.)

    Nah, couldn't be.

  113. Re:download it here by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 2

    Pavlov?

    Reminds me of a dog...

    --
    "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
  114. "Can of worms" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That's funny, another poster mentioned the game was leaked to alt.binaries.games.worms...

  115. Re:Speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cool - i'm trying to install it on my Atari 2600 but i keep breaking the fuc**ng CD trying to insert it into the cartridge slot...

  116. Re:download link----warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wurd

  117. Come on Cohagen, you got vhat you vant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Ahahahaha! You think this is the real Quaid? It is!

  118. get it right by Tom · · Score: 2

    Next time, at least leak the Linux version and only that. Bet that'd get the "most-people-converted-to-Linux-in-one-day" record?

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  119. Will iD ever interview again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if we'll ever see any of the guys at iD taking slashdot interviews again. After all, Taco just told several million of the most connected people on the planet to get it from servers that aren't even under US jurisdiction.

  120. Hmmm by tunabomber · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe, before he leaked it, he patched the game so that it was artificially crippled to only run at 12 FPS so that it will spur demand for ridiculously fast video cards.

    Hey, I can wear my tinfoil conspiracy hat once in a while, can't I?

    --

    pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
    1. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no mulder....

      i think ati leaked it so that people would realize their ti4400 were not cutting it.

      9700 anyone?

    2. Re:Hmmm by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 2

      An IHV test limited to 12FPS?

      This is the same thing that happened with the Q3A IHV test.... Who cares, the alpha is probably so shrouded in debugging and lack of content it's not worth the time to download.

      The really, really sad thing about the Q3A IHV test was that people actually DESIGNED MAPS for it. I wonder if the same is going to happen for DOOM 3?

    3. Re:Hmmm by Squalish · · Score: 1

      They leaked it because it was optimized solely for ATI. That is why the best scores that people are getting are around 40-50fps on 9700s and 8-12 on ti4600s. On other benchmarks, the largest amount the 9700 won by was around 40%. The game will not run like ass on geforce 4's when it comes out, this was just a special preview that was made to render a non-interactive movie(so that they could say it was "realtime")

      --
      People in Soviet Russia, however, appear to be afflicted with amusing juxtapositions of the aforementioned situation
  121. It happened to Quake 3. by abdulla · · Score: 1

    This happened to Quake 3 too, its rather disappointed especially because you realise its a bare bones tech demo and it will only spoil things for you.

  122. Everything is brown by mystran · · Score: 1
    Looking at the screenshots it seems that id has once more went for "everything is brown" of Quake1. Only that this time there shouldn't be limitation to 256 colors. Who knows..

    Not that it's bad. One of the reasons I liked Quake1, was because the athmosphere that the palette created. Just a bit funny =)

    --
    Software should be free as in speech, but if we also get some free beer, all the better.
    1. Re:Everything is brown by Skip666Kent · · Score: 2

      I agree, in that I enjoyed the 'brown' atmosphere in Quake 1 as well. The cartoony 'popsicle' look of Quake 2 was a disappointment to say the least, along with the loss of the 'Gothic' look and feel. The sounds in Quake 1 are still some of the best as well. Just an all-around, all-time great freakin' game!

      --
      **>>BELCH
  123. linked on drudgereport.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    being linked on /. and drudge , newest form of DOS attack?

  124. Slashdot's about to be Drudged by mtec · · Score: 1

    Drudgereport just linked to this article on /.

    Good test for the new config....

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  125. Innovations in Violence by Cheesewhiz · · Score: 1
    Am I the only one that is noticing the fact that id, in being on the forefront of pretty much every major 3D PC gaming advance in history, has consistently used their abilities to portray extremely violent, gruesome, and increasingly nauseating subject matter?

    I'm looking at these screen shots, and for the first time in years, I'm actually genuinely impressed at the advances they've made in their rendering. But at the same time, I'm thinking "sheesh, how could people play this game without getting genuinely ill?" Photorealistic, dismembered bodies, blood and gore spread everywhere...it's becoming so texturally realistic so as to seemingly only be missing smell and taste.

    How realistic does slaughter, grotesque gore, and violence have to become before people finally realize how nasty what they're doing really is?

    Previous to this time, I considered the concept of violent video games being to blame for real-world acts of attrocity quite ridiculous. But at what point do the video games become so realistic, and simultaneous -- as in the case of id's latest -- irresponsible in the areas of how they use it, that video games actually DO become a catalyst for violent behavior?

    One could argue that video games can only become as literal as, say, a photorealistic film. And violent films aren't proved to sponsor violent behavior, so what's the problem? The problem is that in video games, you're actually performing the act of killing. Your finger is thinking less of being on a mouse, and more of being on a trigger. How much of a jump is it between photorealistic fantasy -- identical in everyway in terms of how it represents light, shadow, physics, etc -- to a literal physical reality which isn't seemingly any different to the person now holding the gun instead of the mouse.

    No media can possibly be blamed as being the sole cause of any kind of violence. That's a fear-driven, whipping-boy conclusion of the inexperienced masses. On the other hand, when "reality" isn't necessarily physical anymore, where do you draw the line?

    --

    -----
    "Cogito Eggo Sum: I think, therefore, waffle."
    1. Re:Innovations in Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I share your concern. I believe these games are less and less about playing a game -pitting your strength, reflexes and wit against somebody (or something)- and more and more about evoking feelings of anxiety and horror. The environment is made as engrossing as possible in order to leave the player helpless to his instincts.

    2. Re:Innovations in Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just testing the intelligence of its players, are you stupid and unintelligent enough to doubt your abilities to prevent yourself from mass murdering millions of people with a plasma rifle? are you? ARE YOU?!

  126. 2600 Magazine & DECSS... by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

    ...is an example of how a link can be illegal.

    Not that the MPAA was really right about their claims, but courts have decided more than once that providing a link to something unauthorized is illegal.

    In this case, the code to the game was STOLEN. This isn't d3test. It's not shareware. It's iD's property. Property that ws intened to be viewed at a show, not played on every little asshole's machine.

    Nuff said.

    --
    Huh?
  127. best ... line... ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    best... line... evar:
    my dad is watching me play, and i shoot one of the monsters with the shotgun... and dood looks dead... and my dad goes:

    "SHOOT HIS ASS IN THE HEAD, AND IN THE CHEST!!! --- I BET HE HAS DUAL PROCESSORS!!!" .omg. i almost died.

  128. The Doom 3 demo makes baby Geforce cry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well it does. :-)

  129. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  130. Re:The losers who downloaded it... by SoLoatWork · · Score: 1

    So, you can't find it to download, huh?

  131. how long will a link to the actual file last on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Theres already sites out there that are being asked by activision to remove ***screenshots*** of the leaked alpha. Hey, we all kiss id's ass here. Doesn't bother me as long as activision prosecutes the person that leaked it, but no one else.

  132. Your advice will fall on deaf ears... by falser · · Score: 2

    Really you expect anyone who's vagely interested in Doom3 isn't going to try it out? Yes, it's not an official demo like the Quake3 demo that I played for almost a year before the retail hit the stores. But it's pretty darned impressive (graphics, detail, and sounds), and well worth the download. From playing this alpha version, I've realized that my system is woefully inadequate to play this game smoothly (is anyone's?). Looks like I need to budget a complete new system within 1 year.

    1. Re:Your advice will fall on deaf ears... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Looks like I need to budget a complete new system within 1 year."

      You are going to spend $10k+ just to play a freaking game!? Get a life.

    2. Re:Your advice will fall on deaf ears... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that is why consoles games are better then pc games. Not to mention the lack of crashing, patches. More variation, better control, a larger screen...

      AND THE GAMES ACTUALLY WORK OUT OF THE BOX.

      begin flamewar now.

  133. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  134. P2P in late 2002 by Antity · · Score: 2

    Not providing a link and just out of curiosity I wanted to have a look at how wide-spread this leaked Doom already is.

    Result: eMule found 156(!) sources for it on the 'net in less than 8 minutes.

    Seems it's really leaked..

    --
    42. Easy. What is 32 + 8 + 2?
  135. system specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if any of you read anything about this game you would know it's not going to run properly on anything less than what it was running on at e3, which i think was a 2 or 3 gigahertz and 9700. i have a 750 and won't try anything with this game till it's released and I will then probably just buy a new system that meets the requirements. trying anything with my current system is futile.

  136. Slashdot slashdotted? by ThesQuid · · Score: 3, Informative

    This just in! Slashdot has made the Drudgereport! I wonder if the barrage of new traffic will be too much for the new servers to bear....

  137. Re:It's Too Bad-OSS development. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a shame game development can't follow the OSS development model at least partially. The games would get developed quicker. Issues like speed and size could be conquered quicker.Feedback would more accurate. Company would make money off the parts that people really want. The models (art) and story.

    And as a bonus, no more "/." stories on why the games (and industry) suck.

  138. Good Framerates by ionpro · · Score: 1

    Doom III will come with the ability to disable much of the stuff that makes it run so damn slow. This game is one of the first to really use dynamic shadows to their full extent; disabling them increases the framerate by 10-15 fps (yes, that much). A Radeon 9700 Pro on a decent system (512MB of DDR is basically a must) should be able to offer the game playably at maximum detail at 800x600 (>60fps) or (MAYBE) 1024x786. These prerelease versions aren't completely tuned.

  139. Just to clear things up by Alex_Ionescu · · Score: 1

    A lot of people are complaning about the links.
    First of all, NONE of the links contain the game itself, except the second site, whose links have been taken down, and I triple-checked before posting, I'm not stupid.
    Nowhere does it say I've even downloaded the game, and the truth is I haven't, simply beacause I heard the shitty FPS.
    There's nothing illegal about posting a link to a screenshot or cvar list, AFAIK, many big fan sites have done the same.

    1. Re:Just to clear things up by Alex_Ionescu · · Score: 1

      And yes, "I'm getting 12FPS on a Radeon 7500" doesn't refer to my computer. I *have* played the game (all the nerds at school have the alpha).

    2. Re:Just to clear things up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      smooth up alex, and damn straight

      linking to screenshots and write-ups is not a crime. and if someone wants to roll 3(?) levels of a bare bones alpha i see no harm done.

      at all

      and thanks for the submission. the game looks great and i look forward to buying it in 2005 when i have the loot for a new rig. seriously though, thanks for the cool post.

  140. Games showing too much? by yorgasor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Now I enjoy FPS as much as the next guy. I was hooked on Doom I/II more than anyone else I knew at the time. And when I first looked at the screenshots of this game I was shocked at the quality of the rendering, how much more realistic the scenes were than other 3D FPS games I've seen. It looked like it would be a fantastic game. But then I saw a few other screenshots of guys getting blown away, with their intestines hanging out, the various bullet wounds and blood splatter on the wall, and I felt a little uncomfortable. Everyone wants to see their games look more realistic, but where do we draw the line? Do we want to see every bullet hole? Every organ? Fingers, partial heads, various limbs and appendagest all being blown off? There seems like there's a point where this begins to be unhealthy.

    Now I'm not saying everyone playing this game will turn into serial killers, or anything like that. I'm not saying it's going to be the downfall of our generation. Blowing up monsters, aliens, various creatures, 'bad guys' etc has been a big part of my life, and those games have all been fun without needing highly detailed portions of their remains scattered around the level.

    I guess my question is, are other people turned off by more realistic, graphic gore? Will FPS games quest for more realistic games turn to be their downfall, or will they start to modify them so, although the texture & enemies look more realistic, the actual shooting will be less intense? Or will they include an option where the user can choose to play ultra-graphic violent mode, or a more toned down version appropriate for younger players?

    --
    Looking for a computer support specialist for your small business? Check out
    1. Re:Games showing too much? by pizpot · · Score: 1

      kindly ignore the previous post.

    2. Re:Games showing too much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here are some good screenies link

  141. Doom III leak GPL violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Funny, isn't it?

    Microsoft does something illegal or questionable, that any other business would do (after all those running a public corporation have 1 job, make as much profit as possible-its up to the government to install "morals" about monopolies or environmental damage) and /. posters are all over MS.

    A company violates the GPL or comes up with an "Open Source" license that isn't and again /. posts are filled with rage.

    Somebody steals a video from id, what should be the #1 company to geeks (John Carmack's use of OpenGL is the only reason it is a viable platform on Windows and even exists on Mac, the guy donated his own time to writing Matrox OpenGL drivers, released code to his older games under the GPL, and finally is spending millions of his own money to build a rocket to go into space! How can he not be every /.er's favourite person?), and rather than talking about how bad this illegal action was everybody is giving instructions on how to download it!

    I guess its ok for a /. reader to be in the illegal warez scene, but rambus is evil for breaking the law...

    I'm disappointed in the community's reaction :(

  142. Drudge Report Linked here by CathedralRulz · · Score: 1

    Nice work. Drudge Report.

  143. 130 fps by LordShryku · · Score: 1

    I managed to get 130 FPS on a GForce 4 TI 4600. Looks like a good game. Stiff competition for UT2k3...

    --
    ...I, who thus coded, should be somewhat; and as I observed that this truth, I Code, therefore I am,
    1. Re:130 fps by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      As a fellow Ti 4600 owner, I hope you didn't miss a decimal point and read 13.0 as 130.
      What were the rest of your system specs?

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    2. Re:130 fps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you must get about 350 or so in UT2k3 eh?

  144. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  145. Screenshot links by zacheryh · · Score: 0

    :-/ i like that when i click the links pointed out as "SCREENSHOTS and other information", there are no screenshots what so ever on any of the 4 links posted.

    if anyone would possible know where i could download it to try it out, that would be a godsend ;) thanks anyway, guess i'll search google for the screenshots now.

  146. This is a joke, guys by coding_ape · · Score: 1

    Refering to the earlier windows longhorn post.

  147. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  148. Damnit. by John+Carmack · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, this was not leaked on purpose.

    Yes, we are upset about it, and it will have some impact on how we deal with some companies in the future, but nothing drastic is going to change in terms of what support is going to be available.

    Making any judgements from a snapshot intended for a non-interactive demo is ill advised.

    John Carmack

    1. Re:Damnit. by traskjd · · Score: 1

      I think it's a damn shame that this has happened. I for one won't be downloading it. You must be gutted. I mean I feel bad that this has happened and I have nothing to do with the product so I can only imagine how you must feel. The screen shots I have seen look great. Keep up the good work and don't let this bother you too much. I look forward to the actual release and hope I have enough money for an upgrade by then :)

    2. re: Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why don't you guys act positively then in this situation?

      The leak is out, and known about it. Instead of having websites that are desperate to cater to id's wish (eg, Shacknews.com) by buying their heads in the sand and pretending this doesn't exist, or sending Christian around like a good little stormtrooper to cease and desist sites hosting pictures....

      Why not officially release some pictures? Why not just make an official announcement thats somethings been leaked?

    3. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Sycophant.

    4. Re:Damnit. by traskjd · · Score: 1

      Get a life. Sure I respect his work and think that what has happened is a shame but that is my honest opinion. Of course I shouldn't have biten at this since you don't even have the decency to log in to make such an unfounded remark.

      Grow up.

    5. Re:Damnit. by Comen · · Score: 0

      I for one, will find it hard not to look for this, I am sorry I have much respect for John and id, But its like crack or something.
      I have to do it.
      Didnt this happen with Q1 and then id releases something official after the leak?
      I think I downloaded that also :(

    6. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoops.

      Rockets, JC. Rockets.

      Less stress and it's more fun to watch when things go wrong

    7. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha

    8. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you've got the most DYNAMIC account number I've EVER SEEN! It's jumped, like, 500,000 in 30 minutes or so!

    9. Re:Damnit. by shadowofdarkness · · Score: 1

      Do you really think anyone is going to believe you are John Carmack plus to the real one keep up the good work. I have loved Doom ever since I played Doom 1 and I plan on buying Doom 3 for PC AND Xbox

    10. Re:Damnit. by shadowofdarkness · · Score: 1

      Reason I want both version PC version: I prefer it **getting fast computer** XboX version: When I go to friends I don't want to cart my pc over since it is to big plus on the portability point I can move the xbox easily to the tv in my room so I can play till I can't move and just go to bed

    11. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its still brown...

    12. Re:Damnit. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2
      John Carmack has posted here on slashdot in the past. I am %99 sure it is really him since the other legitimate posts were under the same name.

      Well since the cat is already out of the bag I suppose this early build could be used to help debug the doom3 engine from user input. I loved the early pre-release quake3 demo that was released just for this purpose. Anyway if Carmack is reading this, perhaps www.idsoftware.com could provide an email address to submit bug reports like you did in quake II and quakeIII. I figured you could make lemonade out of lemons for this situation.

    13. Re:Damnit. by ShooterNeo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Maybe this is begging the question, but WHY are you mad? It seems rather unlikely that this leak will hurt you in the slightest way in terms of sales of the future game. The people who have the hardware capable of trying it and are savvy enough to download it mostly know what "alpha" means. Anyway, if you were really worried about fans losing interest because of buggy demos, why release tech demos? I recall some of the Quake tech demos were extremely buggy and almost unplayable on some computers, yet it didn't seem to dampen fan enthusiasm.

      The only thing I see that might be irritating is that ATI seems to have broken trust with you.

    14. Re:Damnit. by shadowofdarkness · · Score: 1

      The original creator of "Damnit" is the real one I am talking about the guy with the user name "John Carmac." who has misteriously only had 10 posts and the first one was today

    15. Re:Damnit. by junkgrep · · Score: 2

      Hey, I would be mad if someone decided that they could take something I'd worked very hard on and do any damn thing they pleased with it: and then a bunch of whiny brats would make up all sorts of ridiculous excuses as to why it's okay. Hey look: something I want! Time to invent a morality that'll justify me taking it!

    16. Re: Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not have existance pander to you? Nice worldview.

    17. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Evidently you have never personally created anything in your life that took longer then a week to make. Then you might understand how somone would feel if thier beloved work in progress is stolen, and displayed to world in an unfinished state and open to vastly inaccurate judgement.

    18. Re:Damnit. by DeathPenguin · · Score: 1

      >>Making any judgements from a snapshot intended for a non-interactive demo is ill advised.

      I certainly agree with this point, but many people are going to judge it and start spreading FUD anyway. You're gonna think I'm a loon for saying this, but I think it would be wise for id to release an official demo with the E3 maps rather than having people turn to piracy groups to satisfy their curiosity.

    19. Re:Damnit. by junkgrep · · Score: 2

      ---displayed to world in an unfinished state and open to vastly inaccurate judgement.---

      Not to mention a bunch of retarded kids who'll climb all over each other to piss on everything in sight just to prove how cool they are.

    20. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would entail wasting development time to optimize a worthless build of the game just to silence a group of those all too common internet-idiots. I don't think anyone would seriously consider that a good idea.

    21. Re:Damnit. by duran.goodyear · · Score: 0

      John. I'm going to echo a lot of remarks here.

      I know its alpha, and I respect that, but seriously, I think I stained my pants when I got past the first few zombies.

      Excellent work, I've bought everything since Spear of Destiny, (wolf 3d was a gift), and have loved all your work.

      Keep it up.

    22. Re:Damnit. by Simulant · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. We'll still all buy it. Looks great. Can't wait!

    23. Re:Damnit. by josegenerico · · Score: 1

      Why does this post have a "." at the end of your name? and the post above does not? is this the "real" John Carmac.?

    24. Re:Damnit. by Downtym · · Score: 1

      > Making any judgements from a snapshot intended for a non-interactive demo is ill advised.

      I haven't downloaded the demo, nor do I intend to, but I did cheat and look at some screencaps posted on any one of the thousands of websites out there. I have to say that the judgement I'm making on Doom III so far is favorable. Much more so than when I first saw the alpha screencaps of Quake II. It looks like a great game and I can't wait to get it into my hands to play for real.

    25. Re:Damnit. by Naikrovek · · Score: 2

      He didn't say he was mad, the said they were upset. Mad != upset.

      I'd be upset too. Are you not upset when someone breaks their promise to you? I sure as hell am.

    26. Re:Damnit. by junkgrep · · Score: 2, Troll

      ---Maybe this is begging the question---

      Could people PLEASE stop misusing the term "begging the question"? It has nothing to do with "raising interesting or relevant questions" or "answering my own dumb question." It's a logical fallacy having to do with assuming the conclusion of an argument in its premises.

    27. Re:Damnit. by Derleth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mr. Carmack, I think I'm going to buy the next Quake for Linux. I'm not a big gamer. I, in fact, rarely game. But I do enjoy supporting certain kinds of companies. Companies that give active support to Linux to the point of accepting and responding to the Linux community deserve my money.

      Sitting, as I am, behind a slow modem connection, I'm not going to download an alpha pre-release. I would download it from the official venues, and I'm surely not going to download it from possibly disreputable ones. Even if I was sitting at the end of a fat T1 or DSL, I wouldn't want to: I like surprises. I like not knowing precisely what is going to be there. I haven't kept up with gaming since Duke Nukem 3D, so the next Quake should be a pleasant surprise.

      --
      How can you use my intestines as a gift? -Actual Hong Kong subtitle.
    28. Re:Damnit. by Maul · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is the real deal. He's been posting on Slashdot for quite a while.

      --

      "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

    29. Re:Damnit. by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

      Like many others reading this thread, I too find it hard to see how this could possibly hurt the game in any way (I can tell you, it ensured that I'LL be in line for a copy, or two.), I can understand your being upset with those who leaked it, but people have been waiting for something, anything, substantial about this game. Unless you were AT E3, about the best you could do was that ATI promo vid for the radeon 9700, and it only had a few seconds of footage. Unfortunately, 'something substantial' came from someone else before it came officially from id.

      I must say however, even in it's earliest stages of development this is the coolest (Not to mention graphically amazing) thing I've ever seen, and it's going to blow away every other game out there come release day.

      Keep up the good work, and try not to dwell on this little incident too much. Hell, it's not like many of us even have systems that CAN play it. ;)

      --

      Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
    30. Re:Damnit. by tcc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > Maybe this is begging the question, but WHY are you mad?

      You're working on a project for over a year

      You want gamers and other end-people to see and experience the FINAL result, maybe create some noise by having CONTROLLED (i.e. being very precise about what you want and don't want to show yet) demos.

      You do some deals with some Hardware companies because hardware/drivers development is getting more and more complex and at some point in the development, it's easier to send an alpha build for the hardware company to do the QA on their drivers or reproduce specific bugs that you don't want to explain or make a little application to reproduce it (especially when it's getting to a point where it's a pile of little bugs left and right).

      This is a good thing for the Game dev team and a good thing for the hardware team: they get to demo their technology in closed doors and the Game dev team gets better feedback and optimizations from the vendors where it can get optimized at the driver level. Also having more people on the QA testing of the engine doesn't hurt.

      Naturally, all of this is confined with NDAs and closed environment, and I am sure the Vendors are in the obligation to make any investors or customers viewing anything more than what was shown publicly at E3 or any other demos to sign NDAs.

      Now, every users can download UNFINISHED work, probably a RUSHED build so that they could make the demo on time, and have first hand EXPERIENCE with this build, while having first hand experience with a final build would be even better, now it will be only an "evolution" instead of a bigger bang that what people experienced with this leaked build.

      While everyone here LOVES John's work, I don't want to speak for him, but personally I'd be seriously pissed at the person/company ruining the momentum I wanted to bring with a FINAL POLISHED product, in such a fashion. Of course the final will rock and people will love it, but until then, this shouldn't have happened and some head will fall for this. The people responsible for this leak will obviously have their head chopped off and better be looking for a job outside the graphics/game industry.

      Anyways, we'll probably never know the whole truth on this but early reports seems to point at ATI... I'll wait for the official confirmation but if it would be them, as a (small) shareholder of ATI in my RSPs, I sure would be VERY disapointed at them.

      I wouldn't be surprised for this to come from a hardware vendor, expecially after seeing some Drivers QA labs, When you hire "kids" to play games and do a bit of work, pay them a "kid" salary, and have more or less supervision, you can't ask them for being highly professionnal people and act like if they were CEOs with the same responsiblities and engagement, like one of my friend says (working at another company), you get what you pay for. Still, it's a shame if it would be ATI.

      --
      --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
    31. Re:Damnit. by spoco2 · · Score: 1

      Look at the user history, look at how low his user number is, look at his user name, think about whether the Slashdot guys would let someone continue to use that name for so long and pose as John... look also at the official stories that have had comments by John, from that user id...

      Man... you've just stuck your foot in it. :)

    32. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Come on people - Perhaps id being 'upset' has little to do with their concern over the sales of the game. You and I both know, the game is not going to have any problems with sales or popularity. Have you ever thought for just one moment, that they're a bit upset that their baby got out too early? It's their artwork, I surely wouldn't want mine out, regardless of if people loved it or not, before I wanted it out.

    33. Re:Damnit. by DragonMagic · · Score: 2

      The biggest reason is that the companies who had the alpha, or the individuals, most likely were under NDAs, non-disclosure agreements. Therefore, by giving away the software, or leaking it out on the internet, they're breaking those NDAs, and possibly further trust from id, in the process.

      You may see it as free advertising, or that people should understand that it's an alpha, but if id wanted it public, they would have released it. The fact that someone else leaked it without permission, and probably breaking a contract, leaves id with very little recourse, since they can't put the genie back in the bottle at this point. It's everywhere.

      Perhaps next time, when you want to ask about why one business is upset at another business for releasing secret software or information, you'll better understand before you ask? Hopefully?

      --

      Human nature is the same everywhere; the modes only are different. -- Earl of Chesterfield
    34. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The meanings of words and phrases change over time. Get over it and be gay.

    35. Re:Damnit. by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2

      I've seen lots of posts saying that it came from ATI...

      Everyone should get a clue...

      It's not like ATI put the alpha on their website for download and said "Go get it".

      At the very most, the evidence we have so far is poor english in a chatroom log. Not exactly the most reliable source.

      In the event that it did originate from somewhere insite ATI, it's more likely that some summer intern copied it while they were working there, and took it home to post. I find it incredibly unlikely that a member of ANY reputable company would take the chance on posting something like this.

      Maybe it's a disgruntled former-employee, maybe it's a member of the cleaning staff, who knows. Maybe it's completely unrelated and someone is just trying to stir up the crap (successfully it seems) for ATI.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    36. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When are you going to stop pleasuring yourself to furry porn?

    37. Re:Damnit. by alseia · · Score: 1

      john it shouldn't come to you, all this wasn't going o happen it was just when. having a onon-interactive demo out on the web. will not hurt the game in any way. Yes we all know the one that is out isn not a complete in any way. Think of it this way yes everyone is waiting for just a tech demo from Id software. to see where they stand, with there current system. To make any nessary upgrades. If you wanted everyone no one to have a chanse to get there hands on a leaked demo. then you should have never ever to no companies show that you guys where working on the game.

    38. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well what do you expect you guys aren't exactly the CIA and just about every game out there gets leaked. And its always the same thing this isn't indictive of the final product... yeah yeah yeah. No kidding its not, its not the release version but I'm sure it lends some light into what the final product is going to be. I swear game companies are like OMG the game is leaked now the Chinese will no all our secrets! People are still going to buy your game.

    39. Re:Damnit. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

      Thank you thank you thank you, for proving to me that I am not a voice in the wilderness. You're right, and I'm right, and they're all wrong.

      Thank you. : )

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    40. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it isn't John Carmack. It's some geek pleasuring himself. The real John Carmack posts with the username "John Carmack" and generally sounds quite professional whenever he posts.

    41. Re:Damnit. by Moofie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Stolen, huh? Stolen, like Mr. Carmack no longer has the code on his hard drive? Stolen, like somebody has removed the capacity from somebody else to use the product?

      Stolen how, exactly? What was removed from somebody's ownership? What does the owner no longer have the full and unfettered use of?

      Copying!=stealing, and anybody who thinks that this alpha leak is going to dampen enthusiasm for D3 is silly.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    42. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you haven't kept up with gaming since DN3D, you might wanna look at an upgrade.. or 20 :)

    43. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      see the post by greyjack dumbass... that's the reason their pissed... think about it... oh wait you're probably 16 and wouldn't understand...

    44. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I am not convinced it was ATi's fault, but it could be. Remember when ATi dissed Apple a year or two ago by releasing a statement before MacWorld? Pissed off Steve Jobs quite a bit!

      Anyway, John Carmack will only shoot himself in the foot if he tries to punish ATi by making DIII playable on nVidia cards only or something to that effect. There are some of us out there who believe ATi offers a superior product, hardware wise, and won't be switching just for his latest game.

    45. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but i was just wondering who is judging the alpha negatively? I mean, its an alpha.. its not finished.. any technical complaints are basically moot.. Also a chance for glaring incompatibilities to come crawling out of the woodwork.. How can anyone have a legitimate negative view of the alpha? I've played it, and i can only think of things i like about it.. then i remember how much better the ut2k3 full version was over the leaked alpha and i get giggly like a school girl ;)

      Yea, its pretty messed up that some unscrupulous person leaked the alpha.. but its certainly not the worst thing that could have happened.

      -mixy

    46. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I find it incredibly unlikely that a member of ANY reputable company would take the chance on posting something like this.


      Yeah, its not like ATI munged the drivers to artifically inflate Quake3 framerate, or... um...
      well it's not like they leak Apple's surprise info, umm, well...


      Are you sure ATI is that reliable?

    47. Re:Damnit. by Spytap · · Score: 1

      "Maybe this is begging the question, but WHY are you mad?" I can't answer this from a programming standpoint, but I'll do my best from a filmmaking standpoint and hope that the relevance is understood. As an artist as well as an entertainer, there is inherently a judgemental phase of your work, where the general public gets to see the results of your work. Up to the point where you decide to show the general public, it's usually just close friends and maybe one or two outsiders. Once you get to the point where you're happy enough with a work to show it to the populace, it's absolutely nerve-wracking. You've worked long hours, sleepless nights and you're placing your baby up on a pedistal for all to see and judge. Now imagine this same work without the polish of those long hours or sleepless nights. IMagine the public barging into your editing room and demanding to see a cut three months early; when the effects aren't done, the scenes are choppy, there are no transitions, and you still have the take where your main actor's pants fell down. It has to be horrifying to be under that kind of stress and see an unfinished product put out there for everyone to judge and tear apart. When you make an artistic piece, you're trying for a certain kind of reaction andit takes a lot of fine tuning to get that reaction. You don't get the same kind of feeling when the tuning isn't there, and you feel like your six months to a year of work are null and void because no one seems to understand what you were getting at. It's much the same here. Let it be, wait for the polish and final product. It'll be a longer wait, but the effect you'll get will make it all worth it.

    48. Re:Damnit. by rikkards · · Score: 1

      You may be right that this isn't directly ATI's fault but remember that this is the second time that ATI has been blamed for breaking NDAs (Apple's new Imac) in some way or another.

    49. Re:Damnit. by Synic · · Score: 1

      fyi, Quake 4 is being made by *RAVEN SOFTWARE* not id Software so it isn't exactly in the same hands. John Carmack doesn't have much control over what goes on over at a different company, but that being said he did write the Doom3 engine which will power Quake4.

      So, maybe you should rephrase that as saying you will try Doom 3? Or redirect it to whoever is lead programmer at Raven?

    50. Re:Damnit. by Synic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Copying bits illegally is still stealing. Just because it doesn't erase the original copy, does not make it legal to have a copy. Another example: if you get an advance copy of a book from a publisher and decide to make exact duplicate copies on printing presses and distribute them. Well, I think you'd be in a world of trouble. Still stealing. Didn't burn the original pressing typeset.

    51. Re:Damnit. by JebusIsLord · · Score: 2

      Let me guess, you have used this argument before to rationalize software piracy right? Some people sure spend alot of time deluding themselves.

      --
      Jeremy
    52. Re:Damnit. by Synic · · Score: 1

      What makes you think it was ATI? Because of some log file I coulda made up myself? You ever hear of "flak machines"? Do a google search. It's the tactic of spreading misinformation under supposed anonymous or community sources in order to misdirect attention or confuse conceptions. When people talk about Microsoft, they talk about them using FUD tactics-- hiring "focus groups," or "independent research companies" to prove their software is "secure" or "faster." If anything this looks like an enemy of ATI released the supposed chat log (nvidia, matrox, whatever other companies stand to gain from ATI's loss of mind/market share).

      Also, someone else suggested it could be a temporary employee, an intern, or non-technical outsourced workers (such as janitorial staff) who may have thought it cool to release it. Hell, people who set up the demos at E3 (or any other event or meeting where the demo was shown) may have copied to their favorite internet dump site when nobody was looking.

    53. Re:Damnit. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      And some people spend a lot of time trying to place notions of property on things that are infinitely reproducible.

      Time will tell who's right.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    54. Re:Damnit. by Apotsy · · Score: 1

      When programmers are starving because it's no longer economically viable to write software for a living, I'm sure you'll have another excuse ready.

    55. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should know better than to correct a slashbot. "Troll," indeed.

    56. Re:Damnit. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      *wrist to forehead* Think of the programmers' children!

      Right.

      Programmers are smart. Most humans are. They'll adapt.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    57. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *coughs* CEO's sometimes act like kids too... You never know.

    58. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well It's too late here for me or I would register, so therefore I'm an anonymous coward. Now that that is out of the way.

      How ignorant to suggest that there exists some scheme by nVidia or any other company for that matter to point the finger at ATI. I'm sure you also believe that "Big Brother" is in place and George W is the ring master. Please stop watching so many movies.

    59. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're all morons. John Carmac. is not the same person as John Carmack. Jesus you guys need to get your eyes tested.

    60. Re: Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why not officially release some pictures? Why not just make an official announcement thats somethings been leaked?"
      And what good would that do? Even though the alpha has been leaked, one would think they'd want to suppress its effects as much as possible. Your 2 suggestions for ways of "acting positively" seem pretty irrelevant.

    61. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cant wait to see if it will run on my AMD 2000XP with Geforce 4...
      Hope to see this jewel in german shelves soon ;)

      Greetings from a Werecat

    62. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stolen? fahk .. you PEOPLE PAID FOR ITS DEVELOPMENT WITH ALL the purchases of ID CRAP for the last 10 years.. get a helmet karmack and BTW you aint nothing without the people who made ID what it is today..

    63. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet u allread downloaded it

    64. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Programmers are smart. Most humans are. They'll adapt."

      Which planet are you from?

    65. Re:Damnit. by swv3752 · · Score: 2

      err, no. It is called copyright infringement. It is not theft, so stop calling it that.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    66. Re:Damnit. by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Please, go read this. Definition of theft

      Then tell me copying bits is stealing.

      As for the release, i can understand that a company may have broken thier trust. That sucks. But thats all the damage here; everyone that cares probably knows what Alpha means. From what i've seen, its really fucking sweet.

    67. Re:Damnit. by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Oh please. You obviously don't program or you wouldn't be worried about this.

      Most software shops right custom software for clients. Software that isn't very helpful to anyone else. Microsoft and others that build apps to sell to a general public might be in trouble, but most of us will be fine.

  149. How to up your frame rate on a console game by yerricde · · Score: 2

    I'm particularly aware of this because the PS2 game I'm working on tends to run at 30 fps in the game shell, but occasionally hits 60.

    If your game engine is fill-rate bound and running at a solid 40 to 50 fps, and it's being displayed on an interlaced display (such as a standard television set), you can go 60 fps real easy: just render the odd scanlines in odd frames and the even scanlines in even frames. That's what Tobal No. 1 (PSX virtua fighter clone) and Ehrgeiz (Tobal with textures) do. But it still won't help if your engine is T&L bound.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:How to up your frame rate on a console game by Ultraken · · Score: 1
      In the shell, I'm pretty sure it's T&L bound as there's not much overdraw going on, but lots of vertices. In the game, it's actually simulation bound, as PS2 memory doesn't like random access (which the physics and collision system do a lot). That's what happens when you start with a PC background and move to consoles... :)

      I've heard about that half-frame trick before from several sources, and it's a big win if you can pull it off. Not only does it halve your fill-rate requirement, it halves the size of your back buffer, front buffer, and z buffer, so you have more space for textures. Unfortunately, it doesn't handle dropped frames very well.

  150. Draw each field as a separate frame by yerricde · · Score: 1

    a NTSC television will give you the end effect of a frame rate cap of 30 frames per second

    Not if you play to the interlacing, as I mentioned in my other comment.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  151. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the MOST insightful post in the story alone.

    More people should be like the above guy. Kudos.

  152. Re:The losers who downloaded it... by Cloud+9 · · Score: 2
    If you really appreciate a good game, show some respect already.

    ...

    Games are made so people buy them and play them. People find a free copy of an unreleased, highly anticipated, much hyped game. You expect people to not download it out of respect? You think people, after playing those 3 levels in the leaked alpha, aren't going to go out and buy the game?

    I think you're the one that needs to get a grip.

    --
    Karma: Dyn-o-mite!(mostly affected by Jimmy Walker reading your comments)
  153. The real one by Dave_bsr · · Score: 2

    look at his posting history. it's the guy.

    --


    Who is this Anonymous Coward character, how does he post so much, and why is he always such a whore?
  154. Re:Not interested...Dual CPU's? by Zzootnik · · Score: 1

    Well...this seems an appropriate place to ask about framerate...
    I Haven't downloaded the alpha, and I really don't intend to unless ID comes out and says "okay, guys- might as well give it a shot...",(I'll wait for the official demo and the release party) but I AM curious as to whether or not SMP is enabled (and effective) in the game...Multithread an app, and it can get so damn smooth.

    Q3's smp support really didn't seem to help much, and actually seemed to lock up my computer a bit harder when it would lock--- w/o smp, I could recover gracefully---

    So...any dual-cpu warex kiddies out there try it yet?

    --
    Sig currently under construction. Mind the gap....
  155. Re:FP by martyn+s · · Score: 1

    If you said that there hasn't been much innovation since Half-Life, I'd whole-heartedly agree with you. But if you're actually saying to me, with a straight face, that there hasn't been much innovation since Doom, I'd have to conclude that you really don't actually play videogames. There are a lot of those types on Slashdot lately, I've noticed. They like to blab about their opinions about video games, but they don't actually even play them.

  156. Re:FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK you anonymous fucking shithead... If the same old game can't be played over and over again and STILL be enjoyable, then tell me exactly what game you think r0xorz? You can't can you? That's because FPS games are pure enjoyment. They keep you going for hours. The only thing they DO need, is a little change of scenery every once in a while. If they can make the scenery more realistic, that's even cooler. Don't you ever get that feeling after playing an FPS for hours and then stopping, that you just got back home from being out somewhere? That's what gaming is all about... more real than real... Who the fuck cares about puzzles? The only other game that has ever given me that same feeling is something like Myst, Riven or Exile. So blow it out your canker infested asshole!!!!

  157. Different Perspective by fyzix · · Score: 0, Troll

    First off, I'd like to say being a student on a limited budget I buy very few games. My collection of modern games includes Starcraft, Quake 2, Red Alert 2, Quake 3 and Warcraft 3 and recently added Need For Speed Hot Pursuit 2. I still play all these games actively. Before I purchased any of these games, I download an illegal warez copy and examined the game inside and out. If I wasn't bored within two weeks, I purchased the game. This leaked release, which I have downloaded and played, has ensured id at least one buyer. Being an avid Quake fan (Unreal sucks) I know I will play this game for hours upon hours. I am extremely excited for the final product, I will fight tooth and nail for a copy on the release date.

    1. Re:Different Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those games have demos you could have played for free and that were provided by the software makers. You had no right whatsoever to "examine" (steal) the full versions before you decided to purchase them. Don't invent a ethical code just because its cheapest for you personally. Since when was a product required to entertain you for at least two weeks to get any sort of value? Thats just plain silly. Either buy them or don't play them at all. You may argue its pragmatically better for the manufacturers that at least you are buying some software in the end, but that doesnt change the fact that your ethics are terrible.

    2. Re:Different Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no..I doubt it. There are gamer markers that will continuous devote their time in attempt to bring hype to pathetic games out there. Bug riddened and often fustrating to play, these games are only there to cash in for money, not for the consumer. Now, I'm not blaming the coders, the markers or such, but the more we purchase these "crappy" games, the more the industry will realize, "Wow, I never knew people love games that are never playable." I don't blame people who d/l games/appz/isoz just to test or examine them as long as there are some legitimate purpose to it. But I do have a hard time with people who dl for keep sake.

    3. Re:Different Perspective by fault0 · · Score: 2

      > Those games have demos you could have played for free and that were provided by the software makers.

      Except that in many cases, the demos are old and not representive of gameplay. The Quake3 demo, for example, was based on Quake3 1.11 (I beleive). The current build of Quake3 is 1.32, and has had many tweaks over the ages.

    4. Re:Different Perspective by Synic · · Score: 1

      Agreed... you may think you are being "utilitarian," but that philosophy only works when the happiness of *everyone* is considered, not just your own selfish desires. Two weeks is a lot of gameplay for some of the titles that come out these days. If you are short of cash use your brain instead of pirating games. Play demos, read reviews, and above all else listen to what people say about the game. All of which are perfectly legal. Hell, there's nothing wrong with just waiting a few weeks after a game is *officially* released to see what saps who blew their money on the game think of the pile of code.

    5. Re:Different Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      boo. hoo. hoo. And don't play moral superior, and reinvent the meaning of the word "steal." There are lots of games that had working demos and completely fucked up retail versions. I hope you only buy games from places with really nice return policies. :-p

    6. Re:Different Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um. You've posted a rather pointless and useless argument. The fact is that most demos are very representative of the gameplay. Specifically your example of the Q3 demo v. the latest patch of Q3. Yes, there are differences, but the idea is to give you a feel for what the game is, not as a free test bed to determine if the game is going to meet your stringent progamer sense of gameplay. It's not relevant to the concept expressed by the demo if the machine gun does 9 pts/sec of 10 pts/sec of damage or if the rocket has a splash radius of 100 units or 110 units. Not to mention that at least one of the patche releases was to fix a map problem on a map that isn't in the demo. The same thing applies to games like Star Craft... it's just not important if a zerling can move 50 units/sec or 45 units/sec.

      Actually the coolest thing about demos and patches is that you can take the q2 demo and apply the most recent full q2 patch and, except for one texture, you can play all of the DM maps online against actual buyers of the game. Whee.

    7. Re:Different Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A little too close to the truth for you, hmm?

  158. DOOMED! - Videogames Turn Deadly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  159. Re:The losers who downloaded it... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

    www.daemon-tools.com

    It's not exactly official, but it's a very useful tool I use to ensure that I don't have to worry about destroying my CDs. :)

    --
    It's been a long time.
  160. Or this? by junkgrep · · Score: 2

    Or perhaps interested in these brilliant gems of wit and wisdom?:

    you are very bright
    Shut up
    Quiet tards

  161. Re: Damnit, I can't writ good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to the world of English, new speaker!

    But seriously, have you seen the size of the X-Box? You can drive that thing around town if you put wheels on it. Seriously. Cart your PC around. You'll be happier. Vroom!

  162. HELLO JOHN CARMACK, WILL YOU PLEASE SIGN MY NAKED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BUTT?

  163. Re:fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eat my fuck you little bukkake slurping faggot. First Post trolls r0x0rz over all other trolls. The only people whodon't like them are f4g0rtz.

    fuck off looser.

  164. heh by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 0, Troll

    Making any judgements from a snapshot intended for a non-interactive demo is ill advised.

    So we can still keep buying all that HYPE about it and keep believing that it's somehow revolutionary, and not a cheesy Resident Evil / Half-Life ripoff?

    And keep believing that all those pixel shaders and stencil shadows actually make anything besides the models look better, and that running at 20fps on a brand new machine is actually worth using all the poorly designed new graphics features?

    Right...

    1. Re:heh by Rothron+the+Wise · · Score: 2

      What's eatin' you, pal? Who's twisting your arm to buy Doom3? "Poorly desgined new graphics features", and I suppose you can do better?

      I'm pretty confident that Id will release something before the game is out, as they always have in the past. You'll be able to test the finished thing and then decide if you want to buy the game or not. I cannot envision why it should bother you the least that people have high hopes for Doom3 and are eager to try it out, unless you're upset because your hardware can't keep up.

      Something a wise man once told me: No matter how smart you are, never make fun of people who are happier than you are. They must be doing something right.

      --
      A witty .sig proves nothing
    2. Re:heh by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

      You ass... why is it so many people keep making this same comment.

      No, it DOESNT run at 20fps on a brand new machine - on a modest GeForce4 Ti4400 & Athlon XP2000+ the game runs perfectly (40fps+) with 4x antialias. This is not a 'new' machine by any stretch of the imagination, but it still works just fine.

      I dont see how you are trying to make judgements based on this leaked code... the game is still alpha - it is NOT FINISHED YET. SO ITS HARDLY GOING TO RUN LIKE A FINAL RELEASED GAME! Optimisations have not been added - the code was designed to run on a fast platform, built specifically for E3.

      Sheesh... >:|

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    3. Re:heh by Mac+Degger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And that is exactly the reason why iD is pissed at a leak. Alpha software, even beta software, is just that: it's not finished, it's not polished, it's not optimised. It's not even feature rich, let alone feature complete.

      Normal people, who have even a passing interest in software, any kind of software, know that. You on the other hand are just a troll who has no clue. You're complaining about low frame rates for a game which hasn't been optimised yet. The guys at iD are just happy to have stuff show up on screen and not crash most of the time at this point (well, they're further than that, but the point stands). It'll get fixed, but that takes time. This is exactly the reason why iD is "upset"; morons like you making a presumption that framerates are low now, so they'll be low when the game comes out (in more than half a years time, which also means a new generation of gfx hardware, btw).
      You're complaing about gameplay for something which has not half of the features, weapons and AI (which is always tackled last, as it needs to be designed with every feature and more importantly the implementation of those features in mind).

      "keep believing that all those pixel shaders and stencil shadows actually make anything besides the models look better"

      No, they make the environment around the model look pretty too. You don't even seem to know what those things do...I'm impressed by your overall lack of knowledge, insight and your mastery of stupidity.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    4. Re:heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well put.

    5. Re:heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      speaking that the doom series was started way beofre halflife or resident evil were ever a thought you could say halflife and resident evil are a rip off of doom. dont be a stupid dush bag trying to say shit they dont even know or understand.

  165. Re: john carmack pretender by jean-guy69 · · Score: 1


    this guy is pretending to be john carmac but he's not...

    the real one is user #101025:
    http://slashdot.org/~John%20Carmack/

  166. Re:FP by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    I don't know about id, but I generally thought "Alpha" meant a game was complete (all levels, full frame rate) and just had a few bugs to fix and the incorrect legals text (publishers are physically incapable of supplying the correct legals text until the game is at least in beta), possibly had some tricky networking bugs and possibly too much memory usage... this release sounds less complete that that (fortunately).

  167. Re: john carmack pretender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duh! We kindda figured...

  168. Re: john carmack pretender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't bother with him.. he's french !

  169. whoa dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you ever get that feeling after playing an FPS for hours and then stopping, that you just got back home from being out somewhere?

    You seriously need to get out more if you think that.

    You were on a trip, alright.

  170. Re:Yeah dig that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    w0rd 2 ya m0ther u ignant f00li0!

  171. MOD THIS UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is some funny s.

  172. CIA by Snardly+Dinkerton · · Score: 2, Funny

    If the CIA were in charge of this the source code would be posted on telephone poles by now, with a "Have you seen me?" headline.

  173. Coincidence? by zbuffered · · Score: 2

    1. ATI leaks Doom 3 demo
    2. ATI currently has fastest video card, that demo was demo'd on. Game runs ass-slow on your GF2 MX.
    3. You buy a Radeon
    4. Profit! (for ATI, not you)

    Sounds like a good business decision for ATI, possibly at the cost of their relationship with ID.
    Maybe ID will get pissed off and take their revenge by optimizing for nVidia cards in the final release...

    --
    Synergy is your friend
    1. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention a few weeks before NV30 is announced. Just enought time to saturate the market before their topped out by Nvidia again. Hmmm Food for thought.

  174. Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe I just clicked a headline on the drudge report and ended up at a slashdot. Don't know if I'm horrified or glad.

  175. Should I play it or just sit back and stare in awe by nexusone · · Score: 1

    Look's like watching Final Fantasy!!!!
    Without the DVD....

    --
    Wise men speak because they have something to say, Fools because they have to say something!!!!
  176. Uh-oh, looks like i have to get a nVIDIA card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, looks as if ATI screwed id over, and now i have to get an nVIDIA card to get more than 3 fps.

    By the way, great game carmack, incredible work.

  177. Speed patch avaliable on sharereactor (edonkey)... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 0

    Seems like someone has made a little patch to change the values from resource-eating test mode to a playable mode...

    Get it at ShareReactor via eDonkey.

    At least it could help you tune the thing ab bit. :)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  178. Damnit, and a Greetings. by FranklinYu · · Score: 1

    Well, aside from saying 'Hi!', I'd also like to say that from what I've seen of the alpha (before the poor guy's computer crashed and burned), I already know I'm gonna need a HUGE ASS graphics card next year. Now, can we expect any OTHER games that look this good?

    --
    There are three kinds of people in this world, those who can count, and those who can't.
  179. Kazaa sucks by cygnus-a · · Score: 1

    But I get all the FPS I want on Sim Park.

  180. stealing the game by tulmid · · Score: 1

    I remember halo (remember that lie) I remember waiting two years to see a lie. We were promised lots of things in halo 10 000 km of level free gaming etc. After I finished halo in 6 hours, I realized that I got ripped "stealing a game is not unethical" lying to your clients is, I will never get a game again without trying it out first. the coin has two sides. if one side is rotten then both are. peace man

    1. Re:stealing the game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6 Hours? To finish Halo? Bullshit. You must have just ran through it without have 1 single battle. Moron!
      Even if it did take 6 hours, they are 6 ROCKIN' hours.

    2. Re:stealing the game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought for some strange reason apparently that the community formed by those who frequent SlashDot was supposed to be in some way above the mindless mass of idiots which pervade the net. Not much to my surprise I've now discovered that you, like 99% of those in regular society, are a complete waste of air. To the other 1%, yes there is at least one other person out here who feels like you.

      Cheers

    3. Re:stealing the game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10,000 km dude i think you had you head in the clouds.. .there were 2 games both comming out on the PC "Halo" and "Planetside" ... planetside was to have 10,000km and it still will be huge except halo got ported and seems like it is never comming ( but hopefully it will sometime probably when no fucker wants it) but i think you are an ass ... thanks

  181. Doom 3 by sixvoltsystem · · Score: 1

    I don't know I got it off the newsgroups and I have to say just having this little tid-bit made me want the game that much more. I have a GeForce TI 4600 and it ran it halfway decent...along with the edited .cfg patch that the newsgroup posted...The game rocks....plus just the amount of detail in the graphics and sound...need I say Trent is god. Once that monster smashed through the wall I almost shit myself...its amazing..the rendering is great...and Trents sound design sets the mood...maybe its just me but I think it'll be the game of the year easy...along with setting a new standard.

  182. Bullshit by BurKaZoiD · · Score: 1

    I don't buy hardware to play one damn game. And anyone who does either has too much money, or not enough life. Flame away.

  183. Most programmers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most programmers will never own the rights to their code...

    But rather the company or corporation they work for...

    Only the lucky few... *sighs*

  184. hmmmm by Manya · · Score: 1

    Don't be too hard on them....they're canadian ;)

    anyway, hope the whole thing doesn't get to out of hand. Many of the comments here are over the top with the Nvidia vs ATI smell in them. I mean, without ATI, nvidia cards would cost twice as much, and vise verser.

    And from what i've heard about the leak, it's pretty dodgy.

  185. Re:The losers who downloaded it... by Blkdeath · · Score: 2
    Sheesh...can't people freaking wait until it's released? Is it really THAT important that they warez an alpha version of the game?
    I probably wouldn't ever run an Alpha/Beta copy of a game anyways, but not out of 'respect' - out of fear that it'll make my Athlon XP1800 system look like a 486 due to, well, whatever reasons developers have for doing that. ;)

    The last Beta I tried was Warcraft III which ran so dog-slow I decided that I probably wouldn't ever be interested in purchasing it, since I'd just sunk $700 into my computer and wasn't prepared to do it again just yet. As it turns out, of course, it runs perfectly well on my system now that I'm running the official release.

    But I'd sooner not be turned off a game before I can see it at its full potential. My opinion, and I'm sticking to it. :)

    --
    BD Phone Home!

    Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

  186. You give NTSC too much credit. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    NTSC refreshes at 30 Hz... INTERLACED.

    Not sure, it might be a 60 Hz update rate, but each update is only have the screen.

    A 60Hz non-interlaced monitor is at LEAST twice as good as NTSC refresh-wise.

    Interlacing is ugly, which is why software such as DScaler (http://deinterlace.sourceforge.net/ I believe) exists.

    Unrelated note: DScaler rocks. It does with your TV tuner card things that home theater enthusiasts used to buy thousands of dollars worth of hardware to do.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  187. DOOM III Alpha Release/Leak by Agnt101 · · Score: 1

    You know, it's a real shame that if the word is true and ATI did leak the Alpha, it doesn't say a lot for a company trying so hard to be #1... Personally, I don't blame the entire company, yet the man who is responsible for the actual leak. ATI is a reputable company with many strengths and like everyone else, many weaknesses... I will stay true to ATI regardless and lend my sympathies for John :0) It's misfortunate that this extremely buggy, alpha was leaked and has fallen into the hans of ppl who it was not intended... I just can't wait until the actual release is out which HAS optimizations... lol... I don't have much to say about the alpha. Anyways, thats just my opinion.

    --
    //Strictly hardcore baby...
  188. Ello! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1600XP, Ti4600 OC'd, 386DDR, 7200rpm drive.. runs "ok" . Although, coding is not there and i can't wait for the final man! Keep it up.
    All i can say is -- "UT What??"

    i.d. is the only software company i support.. everything els is under the GPL

    HEHE

  189. Doom III by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i have the alpha and i get around 25 fps with radeon 8500 64 meg...

  190. Another way ATI sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, ATI cards are powerful, but if I was a developer, I would look at a few things:
    1) Past history of bad drivers
    2) Leaks - Doom III and others
    I would not use ATI stuff at all if I was a game developer, due to this crap. The driver issue has been addressed for the most part, but I would stick with nVidia. Of course, I am just a student of computer science, so what do I know?

  191. Anyone investigate...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone tried to view the "doomkey" file yet? I think it's apparent enough ID didn't want this one out the door.....:) "// Do not give t// Do not give this file to ANYONE. // id Software and Activision will NOT ask you to send this file to them."

  192. Re:Slashdot Responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot would most likely be liable if ordered to remove the links and subsequently failed to comply.

    Otherwise, the views expressed by our users do not necessarily represent the yada yada yada blah blah blah...

  193. You think it's a marketing strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think about this. When the game is demo'd, Radeon has the best product available. id latches on to get the most viable market card showing their product. Then "leaks" the demo (remaining hush hush about the whole thing) and uses that as an excuse to compromise their ATI relationship, effectively "jumping ship" and latching on to nVidia and their soon to be released NV30. Nvidia has always put out exceptional cards and this is the perfect way for id to ride the wave of economic prosperity through utilization of the best rendering hardware publicly available. Could be a load of garbage, but then maybe not! Food for thought

  194. Doom3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The leak doesnt even have complete levels
    only bits o them for show
    Scripting was at an early stage and no one should judge the final by this early alpha.
    With pure Nv20 settings i get a stable 20 to 30fps
    high settings on a p4 2ghz geforce3/ using standard opengl i get a lot higher around 40 to 50fps really slow u might say but no.Its far more a movie like experience and u dont run about a 80kmph like in quake3.
    I for one will definetly be buying this, it hasnt put me off but only wet my appetite more.I was just glad to know that even with this early alpha
    all i gotta replace in my machine is my old geforce3.Roll on geforce5 :)

  195. Good stuff happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me tell you the details about my computer
    AMD Palomino 1800+, Geforce 3 Ti 200, 256 DDR RAM
    It ran choppy most of the time but I was impressed by the atmosphere the game displayed. I praise whoever did the sounds, I haven't heard sounds so clean and releastic from the pistol shooting and the echo that tuned ears can define since.... Well, actually this make beats any other game to sounds. But enough of the sound, Graphics are intense in my computer I was able to make it full screen, I heard some had problems doing that. Staying still had a frame rate of 30 fps. Average frame rate for my computer is 21. When I encounter action or shooting my computer drops to around 7-15 not all the time, but the first time I load the map. Once I die and replay it since the textures have been loaded somewhat its a bit smoother. I have to say that this game looks and is so very good at its current status that when the final version comes out that shall be the king of all First Person shooters (even bigger than its grandfather), hopefully by then everyone will have computers around the gigahertz and a Radeon 9700 pro and above. A new video card from nvidia the NV30 or something like that is may run the game very smooth. I conclude that even though this alpha not only very glitchy which I really understand since we are not suppose to have it in our possession has intrigue me to keep playing fps even though UT2003 is as bad as renegade which I will not go into that garbage any further.

  196. NM: Gore is not my thing either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gore is not my thing either

  197. Graphics Cards by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 1

    The real thing isnt due for release for a long time. Odds are that you could get a nice new R400 or NV40 along with your retail gold Doom 3

    --
    Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
  198. Why Dont it Work? by Viper12580 · · Score: 1

    I got the Alpha and when the lvl starts to load it crashes, now i heard there is something i have to do to get it to work? is this true or am i just missin sumthin, any help is appreciated

  199. Ya know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I produce music for a living, but I'll often give
    it out before mastering and final edits to get
    some ideas as to what needs to be brought up, what
    is or isn't wrong with it, etc...

    I wouldn't be pissed if someone "leaked" a loop
    of a track I was working on. If it got the kind
    of positive feedback the D3Aplha was getting, I'd
    be jumping for joy. We all know the finished is
    going to rock, and it won't damped anyone's
    enthusiasm I'm quite sure...

    So chill out.

  200. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    I know. Unless htere is a cookie monster somewhere between us tat muches the amil.
    amil/mail
    muches/munches tat/that htere/there
    heheh
    problems? :)
    * Myxie needs an ircii addon that pipes teh command line through ispell :)
    -- Seen on #Debian

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...