They should have made it from stone. Stone is much more aesthetically pleasing. Plus, if you crash-land on some planet, you can fashion your ship into an army of hot young petrified girls!
Imagine. An alien world. Hot young statues.
I'm going now, I've got a little business to take care of in the bathroom...
Let's just say I took a bitchslapping for statuephiles everywhere.
The posts in question aren't there since -1 posts weren't archived until very recently.
I don't regret any of it. The slashdot sexualists need to take a long, hard look at their discusting ways and wake up. I still cannot believe that people actually -- gasp -- desire to dip their penises in the germ-infested mucous-filled orifices of another human being. It's so barbaric and unclean. And sexualists spend their entire lives working for this total depravity!
Any piece of software, to provide benifit to the author, needs the following:
4) Freedom to decide if you want your project to be subjected to all of the petty politiks of open-source software
5) Freedom to make money off of it and tell people not to pirate it
If you don't want to lose either of these freedoms, then I'd suggest not using the GPL, LGPL, or BSD. The open-source concept of "freedom" is extremely Orwellian if you are not an end-user getting to play with other people's hard work for free.
802.11b, huh? Fun. Disney gets suckered by the "open standards" bandwagon, leaving them open to attack.
Yet another win for the closed, secure networks. Soo, they will switch to a "solution" after losing terabytes of bandwidth to the l33t hax0rs that steal wireless network access with tools like NetStumbler.
You want to be a kind, caring, software hippie and let everyone use your codec? Open source it.
Want to make money? Close it up.
It's proven at this point that it is virtually impossible to make money off of GPLed software. The only people making money are the GNOME guys and the RedHat guys from their IBM and SUN contracts. Don't make the same mistake VA Linux, er, VA Software did.
This is NOT NEWS FOR NERDS!!!! This is NOT STUFF THAT MATTERS!!!
I want to know about the new lunix kernel! I want to hear about how some dirty hacker is trying to get on the "Elf" open desktop board! I want! I want! I need! I need!
However, petrification is a real and attractive alternative, and if you look in my user history, you will see that I've been moderated down many times for my opinions! How fair is that? Plus, I've had people respond with links to a picture of someone's discusting, slimy anus! Eeeew!
I'm sorry, but you sexualists discust me. You're so closed minded.
Slashdot Mirror
We are we are!
The trools of the nation!
We are we are!
The trools of the nation!
Well there's your problem!
They should have made it from stone. Stone is much more aesthetically pleasing. Plus, if you crash-land on some planet, you can fashion your ship into an army of hot young petrified girls!
Imagine. An alien world. Hot young statues.
I'm going now, I've got a little business to take care of in the bathroom...
Let's just say I took a bitchslapping for statuephiles everywhere.
The posts in question aren't there since -1 posts weren't archived until very recently.
I don't regret any of it. The slashdot sexualists need to take a long, hard look at their discusting ways and wake up. I still cannot believe that people actually -- gasp -- desire to dip their penises in the germ-infested mucous-filled orifices of another human being. It's so barbaric and unclean. And sexualists spend their entire lives working for this total depravity!
I'm a statuephile and proud, damnit.
WE'RE ON SLASHDOT, WE LIKE STONE, GET USED TO IT!
Nope.
I get this:
Karma: Terrible (mostly affected by moderation done to your comments)
Obviously there's a bug in the system. -13 karma isn't terrible, it's a badge of honor.
Any piece of software, to provide benifit to the author, needs the following:
4) Freedom to decide if you want your project to be subjected to all of the petty politiks of open-source software
5) Freedom to make money off of it and tell people not to pirate it
If you don't want to lose either of these freedoms, then I'd suggest not using the GPL, LGPL, or BSD. The open-source concept of "freedom" is extremely Orwellian if you are not an end-user getting to play with other people's hard work for free.
Hopefully, you think this through.
802.11b, huh? Fun. Disney gets suckered by the "open standards" bandwagon, leaving them open to attack.
Yet another win for the closed, secure networks. Soo, they will switch to a "solution" after losing terabytes of bandwidth to the l33t hax0rs that steal wireless network access with tools like NetStumbler.
Help! Help! I'm being repressed!
...to get excited about robots over the "real thing".
My pickle skanks regularily.
I know of one larger vehicle that's slung underneath...
Who the fuck would want to run a port of a ten year old game?
Oh. Wait. The same people who would want to run a thirty year old operating system.
Nevermind.
You want to be a kind, caring, software hippie and let everyone use your codec? Open source it.
Want to make money? Close it up.
It's proven at this point that it is virtually impossible to make money off of GPLed software. The only people making money are the GNOME guys and the RedHat guys from their IBM and SUN contracts. Don't make the same mistake VA Linux, er, VA Software did.
I heard that!
Of course, I was also very drunk at the time.
Could milions of trolls and Nimda spreaders be taken off line?
Nah. I use Qwest/MSN DSL.
This is NOT NEWS FOR NERDS!!!! This is NOT STUFF THAT MATTERS!!!
I want to know about the new lunix kernel! I want to hear about how some dirty hacker is trying to get on the "Elf" open desktop board! I want! I want! I need! I need!
Mommy! CmdrTaco made me cry!
The whole "Invalid form key" thing is really really really annoying.
Post more, please! Put something on the front page that goes against the slashdot party line, 'k? Just for old times sake?
______
______
______
______
______
Look past your own vendettas for once.
Yeah yeah, I know, (Score: -1, Offtopic). Fuck off.
______
(Score: -1, Statuephile)
as you continue your little cleansing tirade against us peoples of a differing opinion on sexuality. I tell you, it's sexaulist discrimination.
Or possibly flamebate, or insiteful.
______
Quick, burn him!
______
However, petrification is a real and attractive alternative, and if you look in my user history, you will see that I've been moderated down many times for my opinions! How fair is that? Plus, I've had people respond with links to a picture of someone's discusting, slimy anus! Eeeew!
I'm sorry, but you sexualists discust me. You're so closed minded.
______
Wouldn't it be a better option to focus more of our resources on petrification technology? Please do, the hot teen girls of tomorrow will thank you!
______