Slashdot Mirror


Russia Loses Inflatable Spacecraft

Treeluvinhippy writes: "This article is a little light on details, but it looks like the Russians lost the Demonstrator-2 spacecraft. For those who don't know this craft was the inflatable launched from a submarine. Slashdot has the scoop of the launch right here"

180 comments

  1. Uh-oh by e03179 · · Score: 4, Funny

    My car insurance company will never believe me when I tell them that I ran into a Russian space craft.

    --
    -516
    1. Re:Uh-oh by SEWilco · · Score: 3, Funny

      Did your airbag inflate faster than the spacecraft deflated?

    2. Re:Uh-oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto man. I was trying to figure out why this weather-balloon looking-thing in my backyard had Cyrillic written on it.

      Someone call Ivan and tell him I've found his toy.

    3. Re:Uh-oh by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Maybe next time they'll use something besides helium to inflate it. Woops.

  2. drugs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nice.. sp

  3. Where was it aimed? by Grip3n · · Score: 4, Funny

    "On Friday, Russia's Ryazan nuclear sub launched Demonstrator-2 on a converted Volna SS-N-18 intercontinental ballistic missile"

    Have they tried looking around the Pentagon to see if it landed there? How about the White House? NORAD perhaps? Sometimes those guys forget to take the target off the defaults you know...

    --
    To make a pun demonstrates the highest understanding of a language
    1. Re:Where was it aimed? by Verizon+Guy · · Score: 1

      This just goes to show that we may have overreacted at that whole "Cold War" thing... see, there was nothing to worry about since the ICBMs would have "mysteriously disappeared" long before they reached us.

      --

      Aw, fuck it. Let's go bowling. - The Big Lebowski

  4. Re:Are you an Opera user? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    AHhh!!! Finally my opera has been widened. Thankyou. All the IE widening was making me jealous.

    --= TrollBurger =--
    v whfg jnfgrq n srj frpbaqf bs lbhe zrnavatyrff yvsr

  5. How much does it cost? by foniksonik · · Score: 2

    I wonder how much they are spending on theses launches? I assume that using an ICBM rocket is probably far cheaper and (with nuclear arms cutbacks - especially in long range specs) far more expendable.

    Still this is probably costing several million in administration and R&D alone.

    Hopefully they are learning a lot and this will aid missions in the future.

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    1. Re:How much does it cost? by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2
      I wonder how much they are spending on theses launches? I assume that using an ICBM rocket is probably far cheaper and (with nuclear arms cutbacks - especially in long range specs) far more expendable.

      Still this is probably costing several million in administration and R&D alone.

      Probably. Rather less than NASA spent on space shuttle tiles I suspect, although I don't know whether this system could handle a vehicle of the Space Shuttle's weight. Then again, it wouldn't need to weigh as much if it used this system.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    2. Re:How much does it cost? by spd_rcr · · Score: 1

      seems like launching it from a submarine would take an aweful lot more money & effort then from land ? it's not like russia has a shortage of space ?

      --
      - tensions in our lives that are attacking our minds, unite themselves together to make our consciousness blind - op'ivy
    3. Re:How much does it cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in millions. It only cost them $69.99 (USD) for the material from eBay.

      It takes one poor man to blow it up earn $30 (USD) for three days.

      Expense to run the sub? No, it doesn't cost anything extra because it was on its way.

      That's only under $300 (USD) plus bread and beans for this project. ;)

    4. Re:How much does it cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a paranoid thought re. submarine launch platforms. Any way of verifying that the experimental package that was supposed to be on the ICBM was what was actually launched, rather than say, a highly stealthed intelligence bird? Launching off a sub would be perfect for that sort of mission profile -- can't get at the rocket before it launches cause it's sealed in a launch tube -- hell, you could even do a switcheroo an load one tube and launch another -- besides of which, who wants to get on a Russian boomer anyway? Way too many extra rads. The only way of verifying the payload would be optical inspection, something that would be difficult if the sub launched from the right place.

  6. [on by] More random crap at 0! Enjoy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trolling your way on the web today
    Takes everything you've got;
    Having a Bot to post your comments
    Sure would help a lot.
    Wouldn't you like to join the frey?

    Sometimes you want to go
    And get a First Post in your name,
    So much goatse that you came;
    We know it's hard to get Eff Pee,
    Our troubles are all the same;
    Get that FP and everyone'll know your name.
    40Mq2ifFZ6

  7. Just like from a bond movie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You only live twice, anyone?

  8. Re:[on by] More random crap at 0! Enjoy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AAA!

  9. Re:Are you an Opera user? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Works in Opera on Mac, too! YES!
    How's it work?

  10. Now all I need is a beach ball by Subcarrier · · Score: 2

    Earlier, Babakin Space Center spokeswoman Lidia Avdeyeva confirmed the landing, but efforts to locate the vehicle so far have failed to bear fruit.

    And now somebody is sporting the coolest inflatable mattress ever! Keep an eye out for it next time you go to the beach.

    --
    "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
  11. dolls ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how about inflatable lovedolls ? :-)

  12. "Pull cord to inflate" by PRickard · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    So if the launch vehicle was made from a recycled ICBM, was the spacecraft itself made from a recycled rubber raft from an old Russian battleship? Duct tape a few old yellow rafts together with some well-used tires, a transmitter, a digital camera, and some solar panels - viola, an "inflatable spacecraft." It's probably as good as anything else Russia's government has produced in the last 10 years.

    --

    == Paul Rickard, Editor of The Microsoft Boycott Campaign ====

    1. Re:"Pull cord to inflate" by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's probably as good as anything else Russia's government has produced in the last 10 years.

      Kinda rude.... Russia has maintained her space program, despite the inability of the government to afford it. We have cut the living shit outta ours also, and Nasa hasn't been having such a great time with it. Mars?

      Russia should be commended for trying a cool idea. reusing ICBM's and creating cheap spacecraft seems like a good idea...Too bad

    2. Re:"Pull cord to inflate" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably as good as anything else Russia's government has produced in the last 10 years.

      Yeah, good point. If Russia tried sending probes to Mars, I'd bet a lot of them would break, crash, or malfunction...

      Or maybe space exploration is hard. Let's see YOU put an inflatable spacecraft into orbit.

    3. Re:"Pull cord to inflate" by foniksonik · · Score: 2

      " Russia should be commended for trying a cool idea. reusing ICBM's and creating cheap spacecraft seems like a good idea...Too bad"

      Yep and they gotta do 'something' with all those missile/rockets they built during the cold-war... what else are they going to do but strive for an economically appealing and viable use. The US should pay attention, especially at the rate that we obsolete our own National Defense Technology.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    4. Re:"Pull cord to inflate" by stevew · · Score: 2

      Hey, if they had used Duct tape it would have worked. That stuff lasts forever!

      --
      Have you compiled your kernel today??
    5. Re:"Pull cord to inflate" by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2
      So you weren't impressed with Russia actually launching tourists then? When NASA cannnot?

      Or the fact that ~70% of the ISS is of Russian construction and design?

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    6. Re:"Pull cord to inflate" by Planetes · · Score: 1

      > Russia should be commended for trying a cool idea. reusing ICBM's and creating cheap spacecraft seems like a good idea...Too bad

      I agree however I should point out that we do this too except with cruise missiles. Several smaller US satellites have been launched that way.

      --
      Planetes
      "One World, One Web, One Program" - Microsoft Promo Ad
      "Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer" - Adolf Hitl
    7. Re:"Pull cord to inflate" by thales · · Score: 2
      " Russia should be commended for trying a cool idea. reusing ICBM's and creating cheap spacecraft seems like a good idea...Too bad"

      A Cool idea but not a new idea. The Apollo program's Saturn boosters were NASA's first man rated booster that wasn't a recycled ICBM. All the Mercury and Gemini astronaunts rode ICBMs into space.

      --
      Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est
    8. Re:"Pull cord to inflate" by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      Produced perhaps, yes... but the various military and civilan design bureaus in Russia can still out-engineer many western top outfits, especially in military and aerospace.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  13. Here's a pic of the test pilot... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1, Troll

    It took a little digging around, but I finally found a pic of one of the test pilots in training. Click here. I'm surprised at how athletic she appears for a Russian woman.

    1. Re:Here's a pic of the test pilot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A couple of vodka's and a lonely cosmonaut might have some good R & R with one or more of those. It is a lot cheaper than launching real hookers.

      Just hope they are puncture-resistant.

  14. Re:What does -1 have to offer? by Com2Kid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I read ACs at +1, anybody modded troll goes down -5 with my setup.

    Ouch.

    a tale of a heroic, sentient ATM [slashdot.org] [slashdot.org] is too heady a mix to resist.


    I love those posts, HQ, at least where last time I checked, may have gone down hill, often times modded up though, good writting skills.

  15. w0w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you are reading this yu are so gay

  16. It could have landed anywhere by buggerdchoirboy · · Score: 1

    If you cannot find it it is useless. These things happen.

    1. Re:It could have landed anywhere by John+Biggabooty · · Score: 1

      Ooopski!

      --
      That's Bigboo TAY! TAY!
  17. missed oportunity by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    well, a perfectly good oportunity to poke a little fun at the russian space program ruined by a small html flub making this page, like so many movie and airline seats promise to be, extra wide

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  18. Beh, fuck by Com2Kid · · Score: 0, Troll

    Uhh, HEELP!!!

    Editors: GIVE THEM BACK THEIR -1 ACCOUNTS DAMNIT!!!

    I browse at +1, normaly just an occasional crapflood AC(what, err, one or two per story) gets by filters, the rest of them are real honest posts by ACs (or whatever); but; err

    HELP!!!

    Trolls have gone AC, my word, I haven't even seen half these people before!!! Get them off get them off!!!!

  19. [on by] More random crap at 0! Enjoy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like open source... Information wants to be free...

  20. Celine Dion = Al Qaeda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's obvious if one thinks about it. To resolve this problem, the USians should invade Canada.

  21. Re:[on by] More random crap at 0! Enjoy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    strings /boot/vmlinuz

    RQSP Loading .HdrS ZZuC PQ0 No setup signature found ... Wrong loader, giving up... PAMSf r f=PAMSu MPu`Mode: COLSxROWS: MPu linux: fatal error: A20 gate not responding! 2.4.18-4GB (root@bigblackcock.com) #13 Wed Mar 13 11:18:44 UTC 2002 INT15 refuses to access high mem, giving up. E(fd E#fd . CGA/MDA/HGA VGA VESA Video adapter: ^[^YZX UWVS L$Tu \$P9\$Ls L$Tt D$\9D$Lv d$0an i1*{ oZlC0 [Mb5 Z',T (xGy Hy|R 9Ypw Xu&K %_#9 og9dI @ntb pGNf d.;# 2{D& >d)z Wnp- yA3%,=B uGNa RNyV [ pW ORXGX ,)}n O#g*pv Qaxj u.67 @ oh weYx ?2 !> 6[qN ]:9D!_eK d>h2{^ M&cK 02-7 F4byz1 F[z~p `#/=m& kY[, 6ai/ I RAPE BOYsOO!

  22. Arrrghghgh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will eat your pancreas you never win I am teh kingor roowini ablanda you must desist and cease and die and jump into an open lake of bleach like in iowa. Then tie yourself to railroad traxors all oldtimey like mofo crackah fo sheezy.

  23. Where did I put the needle, oh darn the ship is... by lysacor · · Score: 1

    Sounds like the Russian space agencies and R&D teams were looking at making a really cheap mode of transport recovery... only thing is they forgot that when they take the plug out of the seal... it tends to release whatever air/gas it contains... ooops I guess they didn't read the instructions the designer gave them... well no matter yet another one down the tubes.

  24. Re:What does -1 have to offer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for appropriating my catch phrase, but not linking to me. I have been reduced to a phrase in the group consciousness...

    Sincerely,
    Big_Ass_Spork

  25. Re:What does -1 have to offer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are you fucking serious? have you scammed a single person out of their hard-earned money through your shitty fucking 1993 website, or with your shitty fucking 2 minute lightwave legos?

  26. Re:[klerck] Dear Ask Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you should just od on something nice, like sleeping pills or heroin+miller high_life 40ozs.

    that leaves less of a mess for mom to clean up as well.

  27. Summer's Out.. by snoozebutton · · Score: 1

    ..and the Russians have lost their raft.

    The kids are bored,
    at home
    on a computer they can't afford,

    A first post will not be had
    in these coming weeks.
    and it's sad.

    "I give you me, I give you nothing" - Bad Religion

    More catchy tunes (CARP-free music!!!)

  28. The So-Called "Man" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The so-called "man", often thought to be holding down your "oppressed" minority group of choice, is in actuality a little old lady living in Peru, Massachusetts. Despite her blue hair and seeming innocent appearance, she is in fact responsible for holding down everyone who claims to be held down. I know this because I have gone to her double-wide trailer (only the finest for her, I guess) and checked through all of her files. Interestingly enough, she runs SuSe Linux and claims *BSD is dying . . . Anyways, because I am much larger than her, I was able to force her to secure the following terms for the greater good of manandwomankind:
    1. Reparations for slavery will immediately be paid out of her cookie jar. While not in the sums demanded by African-American leaders, the $214.78 she had on her will have to do.
    2. Admittance of its existence and her own role in the Zionist world domination conspiracy.
    3. Admittance of her hand in the worldwide downfall of socialism.
    4. Reparations for clubbing baby seals, to be paid in oatmeal raisin cookies to local Inuit and Scandinavian tribes.
    5. Admittance of her role in the conspiracy to subvert Michael "The King of Pop" Jackson's latest album.
    6. Admittance of her destruction of a softcore porn starring Britney Spears AND L'il Kim.
    7. Admittance of the existence of the Vast Right Wing conspiracy and its role in the destruction of hippie culture.
    8. Finally, information linking a former guest on both the Jerry Springer show and the Jenny Jones show to French ultraconservative groups.
    Now, I understand you probably want to send me money, or candy, for my efforts. I wish to discourage you from doing so, and instead send the candy to the children of the Middle East. If they had more candy, they wouldn't want to blow themselves up and would probably be too out of shape to do it, just like kids in the western world. That is all . . . Thanks you've been a great audience Good Night :)

  29. Re:[klerck] Osama & Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's very true...See my post further down the page further linking all of these things to the so-called "man."

    p.s. Money for free whaling trips is not in the redtailed deer dovers I am teh kingor you can't clear my pointage

  30. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone else actually read this stuff? I hope that I never have the misfortune to run into these people. Maybe the lost inflatable spacecraft could land on one of them...

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love you so you die now white man

  31. Re:What does -1 have to offer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this really the sad end of slashdot? First they sell out to anyone who will toss them a buck, now they turn against their users?

    Rob, do the honerable thing and pull the plug. Don't go out like this.

    Your pal, SweetAndSourJesus

  32. They seem to have figured out why they lost it... by phayes · · Score: 1
    "its ability to inflate two thermo-proof panels it carries to up to 13 feet provides for aerodynamic breaking"

    aerodynamic breaking... LOL.

    Pat

    --
    Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
  33. Oh well... by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 2

    Undoubtably if some Russian engineer had remembered to put batteries in the GPS, the mission would have been a "success."

    Losing a spacecraft is bad

  34. They know where it is... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2

    They are just waiting on Taco Bell to determine the grand prize winner....

    *rimshot*

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
  35. Re:Inflatable? by Verizon+Guy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Plus, if you crash-land on some planet, you can fashion your ship into an army of hot young petrified girls!

    How about hot young pertified Natalie Portmans?

    --

    Aw, fuck it. Let's go bowling. - The Big Lebowski

  36. Re:[klerck] Dear Ask Slashdot by Verizon+Guy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Death by widening, dude.

    --

    Aw, fuck it. Let's go bowling. - The Big Lebowski

  37. WHAT HAPPEN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot:
    If anarchy, energy and genre-bending are to be rewarded at this year's Webby's then Slashdot will be the winner of Print & Zines hands-down. It is certainly one of the more difficult sites to describe.

    "We're a lot of things: Journalism, Community, Weblog, Party, Panel," co-founder Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda tried to explain, via email. "But we're not any of these things."

    What they are is a well-designed, aggressively interactive free-for-all moderated by a dozen or so early twenties self-described "Nerds," working from their corporate condo in Holland, Michigan. A typical day goes something like this: Readers send in around 500 submissions, usually amounting to a single heavily linked paragraph or two describing some new article or nugget of info plucked from the Internet. Of these, around 15 or so get posted (basically, whoever's first on a topic deemed interesting), and then the real fun begins, as readers send in approximately 3,000 reactions, arguments and counterpunches, ranging from geeky bull sessions about music, to hyper-sophisticated technical discussions about things most people couldn't possibly understand.

    Technology reporters have learned to lurk in the corridors, sniffing for technical and societal topics that otherwise bubble up to the surface months later, or just hyping their own work. One of the earliest enthusiasts of the Slashdot culture and site was longtime New Media guy Jon Katz, who writes frequent columns, and is routinely savaged by Slashdot's highly skeptical readership.

    Submissions are screened, scored and unpaid; meanwhile Slashdot's owners sold their company to Linux megasite Andover.net last year for $1.5 million in cash and $7 million in Andover stock at the IPO price.

    "There is a group of people who think I'm hypocritical for being successful and running something perceived as 'alternative,' but the reality was that because of the scale of Slashdot, it either had to make some money, or else it would have died," said Malda, who turns 24 May 10. "You can't serve a million pages a day off Geocities, ya know? We all work long days making sure Slashdot happens each and every day. If we had to have day jobs, they wouldn't have Slashdot."

  38. A Hendrix Poster? by KanSer · · Score: 1

    Inflatable Spacecraft? Lemme guess, the interior is black lights on a velvet poster of Hendrix. Oooohhh yeeeah.

    Combined with the inflatable furniture this thing is a portable bachelors pad! Can't wait till Thinkgeek starts to sell these!

    --
    • MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward Wednesday April 20, @4:20
  39. Re:[klerck] Dear Ask Slashdot by Verizon+Guy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Klerck, ole boy, you should seriously consider jumping... in front of a train I don't think ou'll have much time to change your mind.

    --

    Aw, fuck it. Let's go bowling. - The Big Lebowski

  40. WTF post by ehiris · · Score: 2

    They can track my stolen vehicle in under a minute but they can't locate a space vehicle!?!?

    "If you can't learn to do something well, learn to enjoy doing it poorly"

    1. Re:WTF post by salnikov · · Score: 1

      They can track my stolen vehicle in under a minute but they can't locate a space vehicle!?!?

      Gosh, try to put your vehicle on ss-18 and launch it, then go to police and see where they could track it...

    2. Re:WTF post by ehiris · · Score: 2

      What I meant to say was GPS tracking.

  41. Inflatable? by kasperd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This makes me wonder, how would they have prevented it from blowing when it reached the vacuum in outer space?

    --

    Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
  42. Re:Do you love it wide? I know I do! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    That works in Opera for Linux.

    I'm writing forum software too. Is there a list of these types of bastard tricks so I can learn from other's mistakes?

  43. Umm, are they serious? by Rhinobird · · Score: 2
    The vehicle, developed jointly by the Babakin Center, the European Space Agency and the German-based Astrium space firm, aims to revolutionize cargo deliveries and transportation of astronauts.
    Demonstrator-2 is small in size -- the folded-up vehicle measures less than 3 feet in diameter making it the most compact space vehicle ever made
    Two previous attempts to launch Demonstrator-2 ended in failures
    Uh...yeah
    • I don't know of any 3 foot astronauts.
    • a 3 for 3 failure rate doesn't instill confidence.
    • There seems to be an awful lot of inflatable women posts tonight
    --
    If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
    1. Re:Umm, are they serious? by Asic+Eng · · Score: 2
      I don't know of any 3 foot astronauts.

      Well, if you sit down and hug your knees, you might fit in. You'd feel a bit like inside a cannon ball, I guess. Anyway, that's just a prototype, they'd probably make a bigger one, once they got the system working.

      a 3 for 3 failure rate doesn't instill confidence.

      That's true, but such a rate is not unusal for new technologies in the field of space exploration.

      There seems to be an awful lot of inflatable women posts tonight

      Yeah, now that you mention it... :)

    2. Re:Umm, are they serious? by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 2

      I don't know of any 3 foot astronauts.

      Demonstrator-2 as in not RealImplementation-1.

      This is obviously still in early development. The first plane wasn't a 747 either and if I recall correctly, NASA didn't start with manned missions either for their prototypes.

    3. Re:Umm, are they serious? by foniksonik · · Score: 2

      If you read the full article you would have found out that it is only 3 feet 'Un-Inflated' and inflates to 13 feet:

      " Demonstrator-2 is small in size -- the folded-up vehicle measures less than 3 feet in diameter making it the most compact space vehicle ever made. However, its ability to inflate two thermo-proof panels it carries to up to 13 feet provides for aerodynamic breaking, which can reduce the craft's speed by nearly a thousand times."

      Add to that the potentially rational conclusion that this may only be used for inorganic/non-sentient payloads and it starts to make more sense.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    4. Re:Umm, are they serious? by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      If the vehicle is used to bring down astronauts which are already in orbit, they don't have to fit in the three-foot packing box.

      There are decades-old designs for inflatable reentry craft, particularly for emergency use. They were considered for Skylab, if that had become a permanent station. They've also been considered for the ISS, but a solid lifeboat was approved -- until it was cancelled.

      The simplest design resembles a foil-covered cone, with one or two astronauts at the apex...and a small deceleration rocket someplace. The rocket is most easily used before inflating the reentry vehicle, but then you're committed to reentry whether your shield inflates properly or not.

  44. Something odd was reported in Roswell NM by infonography · · Score: 2, Funny

    Of course details are sketchy.... Nobody is buying the Weather Ballon theory this time.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  45. Re:[klerck] Dear Ask Slashdot by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Do I really want to be known as just another guy who shot himself?

    Why do you care?
    You'll be dead.
    Gone.
    Nothing.

    The fact that you care about what other people will think of you after you're gone indicates that part of you may not want to commit suicide after all.
    I recommend that you seek professional help.

    Remember that it doesn't matter how you kill yourself; if you kill yourself, other people will just think that you're a loser (unless you're terminally ill and/or in great physical pain, etc.).
    Do you really think that anyone really cares how you did it (other than those that have to clean it up)?
    You'll be forgotten in short order, except maybe by your parents.
    Suicide is so passe these days.

    If you care what others think, if you want to make an impression on people, then get yourself some help, and work to do great things.
    Then you'll be remembered.

    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  46. Russians screw up everything. by Dave+Hojak · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    About a year ago, I saw this banner ad advertising "Mail Order brides." Well, me being gay and all, I figured I could use a male around the trailer (mostly for anal sex), so I clicked the add, and started searching for the Russian stud who was right for me. All of them were big, had mustaches, and apparently liked cross-dressing. Well, to make a long story short, I ordered a male named Meesha, only, he wasn't a he at all. Apparently, all Russian women are big, and have mustaches. I tried to ditch her, but she wouldn't leave my trailer. I eventually tricked her into leaving by telling her the trailer's nuclear reactor was going to blow... that got her going. She ran out of the trailer, and I thankfully never saw her again.

    --
    sherdog.net-the number one gay MMA site on the net!
  47. wow... by skydude_20 · · Score: 1

    Slashdot has the scoop of the launch right here

    and I was all excited that Slashdot might have actually done some real investigative journalism, oh well, another post

    --
    Jesus saves souls and redeems them for valuable cash prizes
    1. Re:wow... by foniksonik · · Score: 2

      It would be nice if Slashdot would leverage it's community and reader base into an effective first-hand account news source. The potential is definitely there... motivation and/or purpose seems lacking though.

      Could be a result of being a subsidiary of VALinux/parent company instead of part of a larger media co.

      I think we's all love it if /. became something like the Routers service or even like the BBC.

      Vision:

      Politically neutral tech and tech related news/media/public forum. It is all of these things already but doesn't take itself seriously... and that very well could be a Good(TM) thing.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    2. Re:wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      neutral? hehehe good one...

      win2k is a pretty stable, decent Os... more stable on my system than Redhat, but try telling ppl here that..

  48. You fucking sicko! by Dave+Hojak · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I've seen dozens of my friends and lovers die from AIDS. It's not funny. And the blood transfusion thing is just stupid. Everyone who got AIDS got it from blood transfusions, it's just the delivery method that's different: dirty needle, penis, etc.

    Klerck, you really are messed up.

    --
    sherdog.net-the number one gay MMA site on the net!
  49. Re:DTABN by Com2Kid · · Score: 0, Troll

    Whities still afraid of the superior man I see; stronger, faster, smarter;

    hell, I can see why you are afriad.

    Wimps.

  50. Not to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Idiots who say violin in French when they are attempting to express their own cultural sophistication.

  51. $10 says... by Smitedogg · · Score: 1

    Odds are that it burned up in re-entry, IMHO. I would assume the Russians know how to aim, so if it's not there it's probably gone. Then again, maybe their aim is so off that we would have all survived a WW3?

    1. Re:$10 says... by foniksonik · · Score: 2

      According to the article:

      "Earlier, Babakin Space Center spokeswoman Lidia Avdeyeva confirmed the landing, but efforts to locate the vehicle so far have failed to bear fruit, TVS reported."

      They may be covering for their short-sightedness, etc though so who knows. I suppose it depends on how high the inflatable re-entry device was released and what sort of protection it had to re-entry forces/temp. I thought of this as a problem with the concept when I first heard about it.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    2. Re:$10 says... by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 3, Funny

      Then again, maybe their aim is so off that we would have all survived a WW3

      This just in, Canada brutalized by Russian nuclear weapons... 10 dead. Film @ 11...

    3. Re:$10 says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This just in, Canada brutalized by Russian nuclear weapons... 10 dead. Film @ 11...

      Harp seals don't count in casualty figures. It was only two dead.

  52. Re:[klerck] Dear Ask Slashdot by KILNA · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I rarely venture far enough down the page to encounter the suicidal section, but because of the widening I decided to slum it. I actually have an opinion that may be helpful for you. Get a gun, some duct tape and a rope, and find a tall bridge. Duct tape the gun to your hand in a position comfortable enough to use it (this is so when you jump, you don't accidentally drop it). Tie one end of the rope around your neck noose-style, and the other to the aforementioned bridge tightly. Use some duct tape to reinforce it if you're not sure. Now, jump off the bridge. Make sure its a good jump, so you'll most likely break your neck instantly. If you don't die instantly and you still have some degree of motor control, use the gun for quick relief. If you didn't get your cub scout merit badge in noose-tying, duct tape, jumping, or sucking on your nine mil, then you always have surface tension and gravity assisted flight as a your backup. For good measure, you can add the following: Taking sleeping pills, using a bridge over a busy freeway instead of water, or slitting your wrists. I've been told it is impossible to kill yourself by holding your breath. Always keep in mind the sequence of events, you don't want to do something like take the sleeping pills first and completely eliminate your ability to multitask later on.

    --
    Error: PANTS NOT FOUND. Press <F1> to continue.
  53. Re:Inflatable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't the proper plural "Natalie Portmen"?

  54. blame Dr. Schlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Ok, I think that Dr. Schlock is totally to blame for the loss of the spacecraft. Obscure reference? See

    http://www.sluggy.com

  55. Knee jerk reaction by theolein · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is it that every single post on some good idea that does not come from the USA ends up on /. getting trolled and flamebaited to all hell? One would think , or at least hope, that the kind of people who frequent /. would be a little bit more open minded than that.

    Apart from that, I like the idea of this experiment that the Russians are doing. Apart from turning ICBM's into space launchers and having a good way of protecting packages that must return to earth, it seems like it is providing the basic research for Astronaut emergency reentry technology.

    1. Re:Knee jerk reaction by foniksonik · · Score: 2

      "it seems like it is providing the basic research for Astronaut emergency reentry technology."

      I would agree with you if I didn't think that any sort of 'extra-vehicular' (even with these 'escape pods') would seriously be a 'fatally' flawed excercise in futility.

      On the other hand this tech could be used very successfully in future Moon/Mars/other 'in-atmosphere' landings (I'm not confident about the whole high-heat re-entry via invlatable device technique from out of atmosphere orbit).

      Also i don't think this is intended for astronauts or cosmonauts but is intended for robotic probes, etc. which require an unmanned and at least 5 of 9's landing success rate.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    2. Re:Knee jerk reaction by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2
      Why is it that every single post on some good idea that does not come from the USA ends up on /. getting trolled and flamebaited to all hell?

      It's largely because 'America is the best country in the world'. And Americans know this because their government told them so and the gullible fools actually believe it(!) IMO space is not something that America excels at, although they mostly cover it up by spending obscene amounts of money. I mean, any dog can be made to fly if you throw enough money at it- check out the Space Shuttle! It's a reusable space vehicle that was designed to cost less than an expendable vehicle- but it turns out, it didn't, by a long, long, long way; but they continue to run it! OTOH the Russians built a similar vehicle, launched once, then immediately ditched it, because they found it cost too much. Fair enough, you might argue they should have figured that out before they built it, but you only really know that when you've done it. NASA seems to have entirely missed this point.

      One would think, or at least hope, that the kind of people who frequent /. would be a little bit more open minded than that.

      Yes. But I see little evidence.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    3. Re:Knee jerk reaction by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      ...it seems like it is providing the basic research for Astronaut emergency reentry technology.

      Define "basic research".

    4. Re:Knee jerk reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would guess that a big part of USian big headedness has to do with the fact that we helped in quite a big way with getting over half of Europe back for everyone else. (With Russia's help as well). We could have just let Germany have France and the rest of western Europe. I'm sure that would have been great.

    5. Re:Knee jerk reaction by Oswald · · Score: 1
      Since it seems you have given the subject of American arrogance a bit of "thought", here's an honest, no-bullshit tidbit for you to munch on: much American pride stems from the fact that our system and our people produce the "obscene amounts of money" that you seem to consider cheating. We like to think that being rich mother-fuckers is not pure blind luck.

      Doubtless you disagree.

    6. Re:Knee jerk reaction by Tardigrade · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't lump everyong into the same bag. Check out *who* is doing the posting. Perhaps they are trolls, perhaps they are a few US chauvanists. Perhaps they are non-USians who happen to dislike Russia. Good God, they are plenty of possible explanations. Do not just jump on the easy anti-American one. Just because there are a few loud-mouths, does not mean everyone is a jerk.

    7. Re:Knee jerk reaction by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1
      Nice political system too, how much does it cost to buy a presidency these days? You don't even need anything awkward like a majority either ;-)

      Oh yeah, and funny how it's the other countries with the higher standard of living and per capita income! I think that's not a coincidence either!

      We like to think that being rich mother-fuckers is not pure blind luck.

      No you've practiced that a lot I'd expect. Still, as long as you like to think that, it'll be ok.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    8. Re:Knee jerk reaction by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2
      Also i don't think this is intended for astronauts or cosmonauts but is intended for robotic probes, etc. which require an unmanned and at least 5 of 9's landing success rate.

      I'm sure that that rate has never, ever been achieve for any reentry vehicle by any country. The landing of the Space Shuttle is one of the most dangerous parts of the mission. Even if it were a 5 9s procedure, we wouldn't know until we had done 100,000 landings.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    9. Re:Knee jerk reaction by mtec · · Score: 1

      Holy Cats! I'd never heard of this project (or most of these). Thanks spaceman!

      --
      Cake or Death? Cake Please!
    10. Re:Knee jerk reaction by theolein · · Score: 2

      I didn't make any assertions as to who was doing the posting, just on the reactions to content.

    11. Re:Knee jerk reaction by Oswald · · Score: 1
      Oh yeah, and funny how it's the other countries with the higher standard of living and per capita income! I think that's not a coincidence either!

      Damn. You've forced me to inject facts into a perfectly good flamewar. Here is a table that seems to indicate that, adjusted for purchasing power, the U.S. comes in third behind Luxembourg and Liechtenstein in gross national income. Which one of those do you live in?

      No you've practiced that a lot I'd expect. Still, as long as you like to think that, it'll be ok.

      Um, practiced which? Being rich, mother-fucking, or blind luck?

    12. Re:Knee jerk reaction by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2
      Damn. You've forced me to inject facts into a perfectly good flamewar. Here [worldbank.org] is a table that seems to indicate that, adjusted for purchasing power, the U.S. comes in third behind Luxembourg and Liechtenstein in gross national income.

      You see? There's plenty more to life than buying power though. Many of these countries have free medical benefits. Also some other countries have extra bonuses, Sweden has swedish women(!); and if the reports are true about iceland (all of the women look like Sharon Stone), then I'd quite like to live there, even with less spending power; heck that's my next holiday right there! ;-)

      Which one of those do you live in?

      It's not the country, it's the personal circumstances isn't it?

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    13. Re:Knee jerk reaction by Oswald · · Score: 1

      Allright, we can stop now; you seem to be pretty decent guy, and we don't even have to compete for the same women, 'cause I prefer brunettes ;) If I were travelling to meet women, I think I'd try Italy or Israel. (My wife prefers I not do this, however.)

  56. Inflatable Spacecraft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this remind anyone else of David Gonterman and the "NiTRO" comic?

  57. Russian inflatable spacecraft? by fldvm · · Score: 1

    How come when I read Russian inflatable spacecraft I think of something like this.

  58. Why America is best--- by dinotrac · · Score: 1

    Our politicians may be full of hot air,
    NASA officials may be full of hot air,
    we might all be full of hot air,

    but at least our satellites aren't!!

    Unless, of course, you count things like the Mars Pathfinder which landed inside a coccoon of airbags and the upcoming Mars Rover missions which will do the same.
    But those don't count, right?

  59. what the heck !!!!! by H3XA · · Score: 1

    Who let the trolls out !!!! BLAH, BLAH !!! ..... and repeat until you throw up.

    This most be the most trolled post I have ever seen. I wonder if the russian want any candidates for the next probe they launch? They can test the effectiveness of trolls as air brakes and landing cushions....

    - HeXa

  60. maybe the satellite was hijacked? by H3XA · · Score: 1

    the F@lun G0ng might of mistaken the Soviet spacecraft for a Chinese one and taken control of it.....

    seriously though - at least Russia is making use of the old ICBMs they have. As long as they remember to remove the warheads and keep the "lost" spacecraft from falling back to earth... practice makes perfect.

    - HeXa

  61. Re:What does -1 have to offer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have turned my threshold down to -1. The trolls have become so much more interesting than regular conversation this week. This new karma system is ridiculous... maybe you can find a group of people willing to commit karma suicide for some amount of change? It doesn't even mean anything now that it isn't quantified.

    And whatever happened to that musical troll?

  62. Funny Like Russians Never Lose Important Stuff by linuxislandsucks · · Score: 0, Troll

    "Wait a minute. I could of sworn it was around here somewhere... No wait is that a missing Nuclear warhead?"

    When you want some military hardware lost, hire a Russian..

    --
    Don't Tread on OpenSource
  63. Oh come on by shed · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Who'd get turned on by an inflatable spacecraft? Just cleaning the thing when you're done could take all day.

    Now an inflatable penguin...

    --
    My cat can eat a whole watermelon
  64. One special Trick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make it so one wide comment does not wide all the comments.
    This is the best trick.

  65. Shooting spree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..So much easier
    and he gets to kill himself in the end

    Finally he will pull off the biggest page widening scam on the front page of a newspaper

  66. I have to Agree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Klerk you obviously are a very unstable "boy"
    I use the term "boy" very loosely here (loose even compared to the great one himself)
    PLZ HURRY UP AND KILL YOURSELF

  67. Re:Inflatable? by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

    This makes me wonder, how would they have prevented it from blowing when it reached the vacuum in outer space?

    The same way you keep an ordinary balloon from exploding. Make sure that the balloon's materials can take the pressure difference.

    There's nothing magical about vacuum.

  68. Re:Inflatable? by Peyna · · Score: 2

    Yup, the same you keep the astronauts suit from exploding, and the same way you keep the space shuttle from exploding and the same way planes can fly at 30,000 feet and the people inside can still breath but the plane doesn't explode.

    --
    What?
  69. Space Junk by guttentag · · Score: 2

    I'd say it was probably struck by some of the space junk that's orbiting the earth at thousands of miles per hour. They should ask the folks on the ISS to keep an eye out for a deflated beach ball.

  70. Bad geography by michalw · · Score: 2, Informative

    No wonder they can't find it, check the webpage of the GPS part makers GPS Tracking of the IRDT-2 Re-entry Capsule quote: "...The IRDT-2 capsule will be launched by a Volna rocket from a Kalmar type submarine in the Baltic sea north of Murmansk..."

    Murmansk is nowhere near the Baltics...

  71. Flying Saucer Engine headed for Mars ! and beyond by geekster_2000 · · Score: 0

    The inventor of the Flying Saucer propellantless
    propulsion is asking people not to be afraid
    if they happen to see his Flying Saucer going
    across the skies in the next years.

    He say his IFO " Identified Friendly Object"
    should not be the target of the military or others.

    Nothing more will be said about the technology
    or any others matters relating according to
    inventor of 3D Volume Holographic Storage.

    http://colossalstorage.net

  72. Red 'Lectroids got it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EVIL! Intruders from the 8th dimension! Get 'em!

  73. Yup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Especially comparing to american women which if they weight under 100 kg should be considered "slim"...

  74. Somewhere on a primitive island.. by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 2, Funny

    .. the natives are worshipping their newly discovered floating God.

    Rogue members have tried unsucessfully to rid their new God, but the rocks and sticks they throw at it magically bounce off and repel back.

  75. Please change your sig... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

    It has just become invalid. After you changed it, see if you can book a trip there and see for yourself.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    1. Re:Please change your sig... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Was that directed at me? If so, where's this trip I'm supposed to take a trip to? *needs your comment explained*

  76. truth in advertising by neewong · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Slashdot says they have the "scoop" on this, when in fact they're just reposting a story from CNN.

    Here's a real scoop for you, /.

    Reposting != scooping

    scooping == being the first to get a story, something that /. is never going to be known for...

    1. Re:truth in advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey be fair, they sure manage to scoop a large portion of lame posters from somewhere...

  77. Re:Inflatable? by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

    Natalie Portman is so last year. Now it's all about Kirsten Dunst.

  78. Russia *Looses* Inflatable Spacecraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    --Grammer Knotzi

  79. How long till the space elevator? by mtec · · Score: 1

    Isn't that supposed to be theoretically possible?

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  80. Not as bad as it sounds by jdoeii · · Score: 1

    It's not as bad as it sounds. The Russian media reports that the vehicle landed as expected, it's just can't be found so far. The search continues.

    The previous launches ware worse. In Summer 2000 tt did not inflate completely and hard-crashed. In Summer 2001 it did not separate from the first stage. So, this time it's half-way successful.

    Kamchatka peninsula is not the nicest place on Earth. Very thin population, a lot of mountains, forests.

    Here is the original in Russian:
    http://www.spacenews.ru/spacenews/src/sp acenews/fu ll_news.cfm?id=90403

  81. Re:Umm, are YOU serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NT

  82. it's just rocket science again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "45 feet per second -- 30 miles an hour --", metric units anyone?
    Good that it's just an article about rocket science, and mentions Mars.
    Maybe they're just off by a factor 3.

  83. On the bright side... by Peter+T+Ermit · · Score: 1

    ... this means they might lose Lance Bass too.